Showing posts with label legal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legal. Show all posts

Thursday, March 13, 2014

House GOP passes bill to force Obama to crack down on legal weed in states that allow it

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



House GOP passes bill to force Obama to crack down on legal weed in states that allow it

Thursday, March 6, 2014

CNN Legal Analyst Rips Mall"s Hoodie Ban: "Akin...to Stop and Frisk"; "Racial Profiling"


Matthew Balan

Sunny Hostin blasted an Indiana mall’s ban of people wearing raised hoodies on Thursday’s New Day: “This is…akin, in my viewto ‘stop and frisk’ – to the pretext of ‘stop and frisk’ – and I think many courts have found that this type of behavior is unacceptable, and downright unconstitutional.”


The CNN legal analyst also contended that “‘hoodie’ is code for ‘thug’ in many places,” and later claimed that “to identify just hoodies in my view…it’s very, very clear what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about racial profiling. It’s code for racial profiling.” [video below the jump]


Anchor Chris Cuomo took on the role of Hostin’s sparring partner during the segment. Cuomo first noted, in defense of the commercial complex, that “the mall says, we’ve had it in place since 2004, so don’t hit me with the Trayvon Martin stick…[and] had it in place because the local police like it, and they like it because they feel it makes it easier to fight crime because it allows people to not conceal themselves. Wear your hoodie – just don’t have it concealing your face, so I can identify you in case anything happens.”


Hostin wasted little time before using her “‘hoodie’ is code for ‘thug,” and continued with her “stop and frisk” claim:


SUNNY HOSTIN: I think the bottom line is, we know what this is about. This is about the pretext for being able to stop young African-American males. ‘Hoodie’ is code for ‘thug’ in many – in many places, and I think businesses shouldn’t be in the business of telling people what to wear. The 14th Amendment protects us from this. And this is, sort of, akin, in my view, Chris, to ‘stop and frisk’ – to the pretext of ‘stop and frisk’ – and I think many courts have found that this type of behavior is unacceptable, and downright unconstitutional.


Remember the saggy pants ban…that a lot of places tried to enforce, and that again was code for black men – please don’t wear this. And so, I suspect that this will be found unconstitutional because, quite frankly, it is. And when do we get to a place in our society where we stop doing this kind of thing; where we stop targeting young black men? So, that there’s a pretext for it being allowed to stop them to escort them out of a mall simply by what they’re wearing.


The CNN anchor followed up by trying to cast doubt on the legal analyst’s racial bias assertions:


CHRIS CUOMO: The other side is, why do you assume that only blacks wear hoodies? That is not true. That is not provable. So, you are making a cultural distinction yourself. Also, the local police like it, which means they see a cross-section between crimes they investigate and – you know, the kind of concealing of one’s identity using a hoodie. And you don’t want to own part of the problem in the first place, which is if there are a lot of black kids, by your own designation, who wind up wearing hoodies and getting in trouble, why don’t you deal with the fact you have a disproportionate number of black kids, wearing hoodies, getting in trouble and fix that? Don’t fix me for having to deal with them?


In reply, Hostin stood by her likening of the ban to “stop and frisk,” which led to a back-and-forth between her and Cuomo:


HOSTIN: …I think, actually, that argument is suspect because we know that – you know, a lot of young black men in ‘stop and frisk’ programs are targeted for offenses that white kids aren’t targeted for-


CUOMO: This is not stop and frisk-


HOSTIN: But it is-


CUOMO: It’s just don’t pull up the hood-
                                           
HOSTIN: But it is – it’s ‘stop and frisk.’ Why are hoodies inherently unsafe? Why are-


CUOMO: Not a hoodie – covering your face.


HOSTIN: Well then, why aren’t caps – in this instance, why aren’t they outlawed-


CUOMO: Because it doesn’t cover your face-


HOSTIN: Of course, they do; of course, they do.


CUOMO: No, it isn’t. It’s on top of your head. This is something you pull over that masks your identity.


The CNN legal analyst used her “racial profiling” labeling of the mall’s policy near the end of the segment:



Story Continues Below Ad ↓



HOSTIN: Look, I think the bottom line is, if you’re going to outlaw hoodies in this mall, then you should outlaw baseball caps – any kind of head gear – ski masks, and just anything. And so, to identify just hoodies in my view, is – it’s very, very clear what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about racial profiling. It’s code for racial profiling. And I think when you look at the sign –  and the sign says, ‘for the safety and well-being of everyone, please lower your hoodie.’ Are hoodies – do they make you unwell? Do they – are they inherently unsafe? And, of course, they are not.


This isn’t the first time that Hostin has made an eyebrow-raising argument on CNN. Back in September 2011, she asserted that the sex abuse cases involving Catholic priest could be considered war crimes, and could plausibly be prosecuted by the International Criminal Court, after the Survivors Networks of those Abused by Priests group filed a complaint with the global body: “I don’t think it’s a frivolous lawsuit by any stretch of the imagination or a frivolous complaint.”




NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias



CNN Legal Analyst Rips Mall"s Hoodie Ban: "Akin...to Stop and Frisk"; "Racial Profiling"

Sunday, January 26, 2014

China sentences legal activist to 4 years




By Louise Watt, AP
January 27, 2014, 12:26 am TWN





BEIJING–A Beijing court on Sunday sentenced a legal scholar and founder of a social movement to four years in prison for disrupting order in public places, a case that the U.S. government and other critics say is retribution for his push to fight corruption and create equal educational opportunities.

Amid tight security, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court handed down the verdict against Xu Zhiyong, founder of the loosely knit New Citizens movement, in a blow to the group and China’s rights activism.


Hundreds of police officers — both in uniform and in plainclothes — were stationed around the courthouse. They pushed away foreign journalists and took away Xu’s lawyer when he attempted to speak to the media, but not before he denounced the process as “very unfair.”


Xu told “the court that the last shred of dignity of China’s rule of law was destroyed today,” lawyer Zhang Qingfang said before he was escorted away by police and shoved into a police van.


Xu’s prosecution is part of a broader crackdown since last spring on dissent, including the silencing and detentions of influential bloggers and advocates for minority rights in Tibetan and Muslim Uighur areas.


Earlier this month, the authorities took away Ilham Tohti, a Uighur scholar and outspoken critic of China’s ethnic policies. A police statement accused the university professor of separatism, inciting ethnic hatred and advocating violence to oppose China’s rule over the far west region of Xinjiang, home to the ethnic minority of Turkic-speaking Muslim Uighurs.


Xu’s verdict drew widespread criticism, with U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki saying in a statement that the U.S. was “deeply disappointed” and that Beijing should release Xu.


Amnesty International called the imprisonment a travesty and Human Rights Watch said convicting Xu “makes a mockery” of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s crusade against corruption.


No Tolerance for Any Organized Movements


The ruling Communist Party is wary of any form of social force such as Xu’s New Citizens movement because of its potential to threaten the party’s rule at the grassroots level. Several other activists have stood trial or are scheduled to appear in court — all on the same charge of disrupting public order.











 Default looms in China 

A police van drives past the No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court, where legal scholar and founder of the New Citizens movement Xu Zhiyong appeared for his verdict in Beijing on Sunday, Jan. 26. Amid tight security, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court handed down the verdict against Xu Zhiyong, founder of the loosely knit New Citizens movement.

(AP)


Enlarge Photo









China Post Online – China News



China sentences legal activist to 4 years

China sentences legal activist to 4 years




By Louise Watt, AP
January 27, 2014, 12:26 am TWN





BEIJING–A Beijing court on Sunday sentenced a legal scholar and founder of a social movement to four years in prison for disrupting order in public places, a case that the U.S. government and other critics say is retribution for his push to fight corruption and create equal educational opportunities.

Amid tight security, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court handed down the verdict against Xu Zhiyong, founder of the loosely knit New Citizens movement, in a blow to the group and China’s rights activism.


Hundreds of police officers — both in uniform and in plainclothes — were stationed around the courthouse. They pushed away foreign journalists and took away Xu’s lawyer when he attempted to speak to the media, but not before he denounced the process as “very unfair.”


Xu told “the court that the last shred of dignity of China’s rule of law was destroyed today,” lawyer Zhang Qingfang said before he was escorted away by police and shoved into a police van.


Xu’s prosecution is part of a broader crackdown since last spring on dissent, including the silencing and detentions of influential bloggers and advocates for minority rights in Tibetan and Muslim Uighur areas.


Earlier this month, the authorities took away Ilham Tohti, a Uighur scholar and outspoken critic of China’s ethnic policies. A police statement accused the university professor of separatism, inciting ethnic hatred and advocating violence to oppose China’s rule over the far west region of Xinjiang, home to the ethnic minority of Turkic-speaking Muslim Uighurs.


Xu’s verdict drew widespread criticism, with U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki saying in a statement that the U.S. was “deeply disappointed” and that Beijing should release Xu.


Amnesty International called the imprisonment a travesty and Human Rights Watch said convicting Xu “makes a mockery” of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s crusade against corruption.


No Tolerance for Any Organized Movements


The ruling Communist Party is wary of any form of social force such as Xu’s New Citizens movement because of its potential to threaten the party’s rule at the grassroots level. Several other activists have stood trial or are scheduled to appear in court — all on the same charge of disrupting public order.











 Default looms in China 

A police van drives past the No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court, where legal scholar and founder of the New Citizens movement Xu Zhiyong appeared for his verdict in Beijing on Sunday, Jan. 26. Amid tight security, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court handed down the verdict against Xu Zhiyong, founder of the loosely knit New Citizens movement.

(AP)


Enlarge Photo









China Post Online – China News



China sentences legal activist to 4 years

China sentences legal activist to 4 years




By Louise Watt, AP
January 27, 2014, 12:26 am TWN





BEIJING–A Beijing court on Sunday sentenced a legal scholar and founder of a social movement to four years in prison for disrupting order in public places, a case that the U.S. government and other critics say is retribution for his push to fight corruption and create equal educational opportunities.

Amid tight security, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court handed down the verdict against Xu Zhiyong, founder of the loosely knit New Citizens movement, in a blow to the group and China’s rights activism.


Hundreds of police officers — both in uniform and in plainclothes — were stationed around the courthouse. They pushed away foreign journalists and took away Xu’s lawyer when he attempted to speak to the media, but not before he denounced the process as “very unfair.”


Xu told “the court that the last shred of dignity of China’s rule of law was destroyed today,” lawyer Zhang Qingfang said before he was escorted away by police and shoved into a police van.


Xu’s prosecution is part of a broader crackdown since last spring on dissent, including the silencing and detentions of influential bloggers and advocates for minority rights in Tibetan and Muslim Uighur areas.


Earlier this month, the authorities took away Ilham Tohti, a Uighur scholar and outspoken critic of China’s ethnic policies. A police statement accused the university professor of separatism, inciting ethnic hatred and advocating violence to oppose China’s rule over the far west region of Xinjiang, home to the ethnic minority of Turkic-speaking Muslim Uighurs.


Xu’s verdict drew widespread criticism, with U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki saying in a statement that the U.S. was “deeply disappointed” and that Beijing should release Xu.


Amnesty International called the imprisonment a travesty and Human Rights Watch said convicting Xu “makes a mockery” of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s crusade against corruption.


No Tolerance for Any Organized Movements


The ruling Communist Party is wary of any form of social force such as Xu’s New Citizens movement because of its potential to threaten the party’s rule at the grassroots level. Several other activists have stood trial or are scheduled to appear in court — all on the same charge of disrupting public order.











 Default looms in China 

A police van drives past the No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court, where legal scholar and founder of the New Citizens movement Xu Zhiyong appeared for his verdict in Beijing on Sunday, Jan. 26. Amid tight security, the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court handed down the verdict against Xu Zhiyong, founder of the loosely knit New Citizens movement.

(AP)


Enlarge Photo









China Post Online – China News



China sentences legal activist to 4 years

Sunday, January 19, 2014

CORRECTED-HP mulls legal action on Autonomy fraud claims, needs more time

CORRECTED-HP mulls legal action on Autonomy fraud claims, needs more time
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif



Thomson Reuters is the world’s largest international multimedia news agency, providing investing news, world news, business news, technology news, headline news, small business news, news alerts, personal finance, stock market, and mutual funds information available on Reuters.com, video, mobile, and interactive television platforms. Thomson Reuters journalists are subject to an Editorial Handbook which requires fair presentation and disclosure of relevant interests.


NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. Nasdaq delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.




Reuters: Financial Services and Real Estate




Read more about CORRECTED-HP mulls legal action on Autonomy fraud claims, needs more time and other interesting subjects concerning Real Estate at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

WATCH: The Daily Show Blasts Cable Anchors Over Unwarranted Legal Pot Hysteria



Stewart: "I guess you could say, you’re a f*cking idiot”








On Tuesday night’s The Daily Show,host Jon Stewart weighed in on cable news freaking out over Colorado’s decision to legalize recreational pot. 


Stewart blasted Fox’ Billy O’Reilly and his “old timey Americana restoration hour,” for saying pot-smoking is “literally Russian roulette.”


“I think the only difference between a bong hit and pointing a loaded gun at your own skull is that the gun can kill you instantly, and must never be criminalized or restricted in any way ever,” Stewart remarked.


Stewart also took issue with “gramaplodeon” O’Reilly’s bizarre attempt to connect pot smoking to text messaging amongst teens relying on psychiatrist Keith Ablow to support the “texting-industrial complex.”


“I guess I could say, you’re a f*cking idiot,” Stewart responded.


In the second segment, Stewart drew attention to data showing that pot is far less harmful than alcohol, blasting Fox & Friends host Steve Doocy for hypocritically condemning pot but openly promoting drinking on air, at one point declaring, “I’m gonna get real drunk.”


“Your argument against marijuana, it would carry a lot more weight if these same individuals had a similar perspective on America’s alcohol usage,” Stewart remarked. “Rest assured, our children will never be exposed to this potentially overstated fantasy world that glorifies alcohol consumption…unless they watch TV,” mocked Stewart.


Watch the two part segment:





For a weekly roundup of news and developments in the drug reform movement and the injustices stemming from prohibition, sign up to receive AlterNet"s Drugs Newsletter here. Make sure to scroll down to “Drugs” and subscribe! 


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



WATCH: The Daily Show Blasts Cable Anchors Over Unwarranted Legal Pot Hysteria

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Colorado opens first legal US pot shops



Published time: January 02, 2014 01:01

Tyler Williams of Blanchester, Ohio selects marijuana strains to purchase at the 3-D Denver Discrete Dispensary on January 1, 2014 in Denver, Colorado (AFP Photo / Theo Stroomer)

Tyler Williams of Blanchester, Ohio selects marijuana strains to purchase at the 3-D Denver Discrete Dispensary on January 1, 2014 in Denver, Colorado (AFP Photo / Theo Stroomer)




The US State of Colorado has entered the New Year on a high note by becoming the first state to legally sell marihuana and open the retail spots for pot. Washington is set to follow suit and open its own recreational shops later in 2014.


At the start of New Year day, at 8 am local time, pot lovers from across the state lined up to be one of the first residents to legally participate in a $ 578 million market. Some people had been waiting since 1 am.


“I wanted to be one of the first to buy pot and no longer be prosecuted for it. This end of prohibition is long overdue,” said Jesse Phillips, cannabis enthusiast from Colorado.


State residents can now legally indulge themselves with up to an ounce of marijuana from more than 30 shops that have opened their doors statewide. Residents from other states can buy up to one-quarter of an ounce.


However, weed enthusiasts can increase their daily limit by shop hopping and purchasing legally allocated amounts from different vendors. Legally under state law, buyers are only allowed to possess up to one ounce of the plant on them.


Sean Azzariti, a veteran of the Iraq war, prepares to make the first legal recreational marijuana purchase in Colorado from advocate Betty Aldworth at the 3-D Denver Discrete Dispensary on January 1, 2014 in Denver, Colorado (AFP Photo / Theo Stroomer)


The state’s prognosis is to sell $ 578 million worth of Marijuana products and generate some $ 67 million in tax, with $ 27.5 million designated for schools.


“I feel good about it. The money’s going to schools,” Joseph Torres from Denver said while waiting in line.


Overall around 130 stores were issued with licenses to sell weed last month. Running the industry will come with a 25% state tax on top of the usual sales tax of 2.9%.


“Things have really been going well,” Ashley Kilroy, executive director of Denver’s marijuana policy, said at a news conference Wednesday after first sales. “We really haven’t seen a negative impact.”


“Voters have spoken. We have to implement the laws,” Kilroy said.


Cultivation, possession, and personal use of marihuana have already been legal in Colorado under a state constitutional since 2012. But come 2014, cannabis sales will now contribute toward financing the state, where it now can be produced, sold and taxed.


“I’m going to frame the receipt when I go home, to remind myself of what might be possible: Legal everywhere,” musician James Aaron Ramsey said in Colorado.


As soon as stores started selling, the Denver police department tweeted, “Do you know the law?” Posting a link to websites on state and local legislation.


Whether or not Colorado’s historic step will be prosecuted by the Federal government remains to be seen, as cannabis is still illegal on the federal level. But shop owners hope that a memo to federal prosecutors issued by the Department of Justice in August saying they should not pursue prosecution for recreational marijuana will prevent them from Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and FBI raids.


Opponents of legalizing the recreational use of cannabis warned that sales will increase consumption by minors and create more drug addicts.


“This is a battle that if we catch it early enough we can prevent some of the most egregious adverse impacts that have happened as a result of the commercialized market that promotes alcohol use to young people,” former US Representative Patrick Kennedy, co-founder of Project Smart Approaches to Marijuana, told Reuters.


“This is just throwing gas on the fire,” Ben Cort of the Colorado Center for Dependency, Addiction & Rehabilitation at the University of Colorado Hospital told AP.


All in all, Colorado has two sets of policies when it comes to weed, those for medicinal use and for recreational use.


In 2012, Colorado passed Amendment 64 allowing adults to grow up to three immature and three mature plants privately and legally possess all cannabis from the plants’ harvest. Residents are allowed to carry up to one ounce of cannabis and give the same amount to other adults.


In 2000, Colorado voters approved Amendment 20 to the State Constitution which allows the use of cannabis for approved patients with doctor’s consent. Under this amendment, patients may possess up to 2 ounces of medicinal marijuana and may cultivate no more than six cannabis plants.


The State of Washington which also voted in November 2012 to legalize cannabis is set to open marijuana retail shops later in 2014. Nearly 20 states, including Colorado and Washington, are already battling the Federal government by approving marijuana for medical purposes.




RT – USA



Colorado opens first legal US pot shops

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Judge Rules Computer Searches, Seizures Legal at US Borders

The Department of Homeland Security can keep searching laptop computers at the nation’s borders, a federal judge has ruled in his dismissal of a lawsuit filed by civil-liberties groups that had contended the practice was unconstitutional.

The American Civil Liberties Union and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed their lawsuit challenging the DHS policy in 2010, The Hill reported. The policy allowed searches even if there was no suspicion of illegality.


Officials at the border search and copy contents of people’s laptop computers and other devices thousands of times a year, government documents say. Travelers may be detained for short periods of time even if there is no reasonable suspicion they have broken a law.


But while the ACLU and other groups say such searches violate Americans’ protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, Judge Edward Korman said there are exceptions when an international border is involved.


Further, he said, people such as journalists, lawyers, and others should not expect their sensitive information to be protected while they are traveling abroad, The Huffington Post reported.


The ACLU filed the lawsuit on the behalf of French-American Pascal Abidor, whose laptop was confiscated at the Canadian border, for the National Press Photographers Association.


Korman said the groups suing to stop the DHS searches did not face a “substantial risk that their electronic devices will be subject to a search or seizure without reasonable suspicion.”


Further, Korman said, policies for border agents are sensitive to privacy and confidentiality issues, and “contain significant precautionary measures to be taken with respect to the handling of privileged and other sensitive materials.”


Abidor said his personal files were searched while Border Patrol officials had his laptop for 11 days.


Korman, though, ruled that the agents had “reasonable suspicion” to search the files, because the man had recently returned from Lebanon and had photos of rallies by terrorist groups Hezbollah and Hamas. Abidor at the time was a McGill University doctoral student.


Computer users should also expect searches on trips overseas, such as to the United Kingdom, where former Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald’s partner David Miranda was stopped recently so agents could search his storage devices, The Huffington Post reported.


“This is enough to suggest that it would be foolish, if not irresponsible, for plaintiffs to store truly private or confidential information on electronic devices that are carried and used overseas,” Korman wrote.


The ACLU is considering an appeal. Attorney Catherine Crump said the judge’s decision was disappointing, but “these searches are part of a broader pattern of aggressive government surveillance that collects information on too many innocent people, under lax standards, and without adequate oversight.”


Related Stories:


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Judge Rules Computer Searches, Seizures Legal at US Borders

Friday, December 27, 2013

Teenagers Are Abandoning High-Risk, Dangerous Legal Drugs Like Alcohol and Tobacco at a Historic Pace

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Teenagers Are Abandoning High-Risk, Dangerous Legal Drugs Like Alcohol and Tobacco at a Historic Pace

US judge rules NSA phone surveillance program is legal

At Those Damn Liars, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Those Damn Liars and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Those Damn Liars makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Those Damn Liars does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Those Damn Liars.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Those Damn Liars and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Those Damn Liars send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Those Damn Liars has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Those Damn Liars"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


US judge rules NSA phone surveillance program is legal

US judge rules NSA phone surveillance program is legal

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



US judge rules NSA phone surveillance program is legal

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Who Suffers When States Decide To Cut Off Legal Abortion At 20 Weeks? The Young And Poor

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Who Suffers When States Decide To Cut Off Legal Abortion At 20 Weeks? The Young And Poor

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

UPDATE 1-EU executive document says transaction tax plan legal

UPDATE 1-EU executive document says transaction tax plan legal
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/96f0d__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif




Wed Dec 4, 2013 12:57pm EST



By Huw Jones


LONDON Dec 4 (Reuters) – The proposed tax on financial transactions in 11 European Union countries complies with EU and international laws, the bloc’s executive said, hoping to revive the flagging project.


The tax on stock, bond and derivatives trades has been proposed as a way of raising about 35 billion euros a year from banks starting in 2014 to claw back the taxpayer aid they received in the financial crisis.


A legal opinion for member states in September said a core element of the tax was illegal because of the way it impinged on countries like Britain that won’t take part and threatening to derail the project in its current form.


This legal opinion and pending elections in Germany, one of the tax’s biggest backers, had led to drift.


The European Commission’s own legal advisors dismissed the member state legal opinion in a 20-page analysis seen by Reuters on Wednesday.


“Based on the above analysis the Commission’s services come to the conclusion that … the proposed FTT directive is in conformity both with customary international law and EU primary law,” the document says.


Now that the Commission’s legal advisors have rebutted challenges to the proposal’s legality, representatives from the 11 countries are due to meet next week to see how a redrafted proposal can be pushed forward.


Britain, outside the 11 taking part, is the biggest securities trading centre in the EU and is challenging the proposal in the bloc’s highest court.


The document says the proposal does not lead to any “inadmissible” effects in countries outside the 11 taking part.


“What the Council Legal Services perceives as discrimination is in reality nothing but a disparity between different national tax regimes,” the document adds.


“The provision has no impact on the freedom of non-participating member states to exercise their own tax competence in whatever manner they see fit.”


Britain and 15 other EU countries have refused to support the financial transaction tax (FTT) which has been backed by Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Austria, Portugal, Belgium, Estonia, Greece, Slovakia and Slovenia.


The 11 countries taking part met last week when France sought to water down the proposal and bring it in line with the more limited “stamp duty” type of tax it has introduced.


The agenda for last week’s meeting, seen by Reuters, also showed that the 11 countries were considering a “step by step” approach to introducing the tax rather than a “big bang” start.


Due to worries over the possible impact on bond markets, several “carve outs” or exemptions are also being mulled for “public” bonds and some derivatives, the agenda showed.


Non-financial firms could also be shielded with other changes to stop pension funds being hit.


The formation of a new government in Germany will also lend fresh momentum to the FTT, with the new coalition there agreeing that its scope should extend to currencies as well.






Reuters: Bonds News




Read more about UPDATE 1-EU executive document says transaction tax plan legal and other interesting subjects concerning Bonds at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Maddow to same sex couples: ‘Just get married’ whether it’s legal or not


By David Ferguson
Saturday, October 19, 2013 11:08 EDT


Maddow on Jersey same sex marriage







  • Print Friendly and PDF

  • Email this page


  • On Friday night’s edition of “The Rachel Maddow Show,” Rachel Maddow discussed a tactic that is being used by same sex marriage advocates in New Jersey, and which has proved to be effective in other parts of the country. Same sex couples have been marrying while the legality of their marriages is still being worked out in the courts, a tactic that has proven effective in moving marriage laws forward in several states.


    Maddow was joined by New Jersey Democratic gubernatorial candidate State Sen. Barbara Buono. The two discussed current Gov. Chris Christie’s stubborn resistance to same sex marriage, even as those marriages move forward in his state.


    Maddow began the segment by explaining that in Asbury Park, NJ, the town clerk has started handing out marriage licenses to same sex couples. Asbury Park was once a run-down, nearly abandoned town well past its boom years, but an influx of LGBT people, artists and new businesses have caused the town to boom anew.


    “And that is great for the residents of Asbury Park,” Maddow said. And while these couples who are marrying, she explained, are individual families, they are part of a tactic that has proved effective for marriage equality advocates.


    “While marriage rights are still being adjudicated,” Maddow said, “just get married. It has an effect.”


    She recounted that in 2004, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom up and announced that he was going to start marrying same sex couples in his city. That action, she said, “strapped a turbo-charge” to the drive toward marriage equality in California. Public officials did the same in New York state and other states where same sex marriage is now legal.


    Maddow said that these acts of civil disobedience have been “a surprisingly effective direct-action tactic” toward LGBT people getting marriage rights.


    Newly elected Sen. Corey Booker has made a similar announcement, in spite of the fact that Gov. Chris Christie has made his opposition to same sex marriage very plain.


    Maddow welcomed Christie’s challenger, Barbara Buono to the show, who agreed that Christie was staking out a losing position on marriage equality, but that this isn’t a new course of action for him.


    “The governor has a history of using his office to advance his own political interests,” Buono said. Not only is he off the mark on social issues, she told Maddow, “his economic plan really has just enriched the wealthy and crippled the middle class.”


    Watch the video, embedded below via MSNBC:







    The Raw Story



    Maddow to same sex couples: ‘Just get married’ whether it’s legal or not

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Lavabit owner eyes legal precedent to rid cloud-data companies of govt surveillance



Published time: August 22, 2013 05:20



Letter posted by Lavabit LLC owner Ladar Levison.(Reuters / Lavabit.com)



Download video (57.71 MB)



The owner of the now-shuttered encrypted email service used by Edward Snowden told RT that he will continue to defend online security free of government surveillance, hopefully with success in courts or a possible move of his company overseas.


The owner of the now-shuttered encrypted email service used by Edward Snowden told RT he will continue to defend online security to ensure freedom from government surveillance, hopefully with success in courts or a possible move of his company overseas. 


Ladar Levison abruptly shut down his company, Lavabit LLC, on August 8 to avoid being forced to hand over customers’ personal information and communications. 


I’m going to keep standing on my soapbox and shouting as loudly as I can for as long as people will listen. My biggest fear when I shut down the service was that nobody would notice, nobody would care and my biggest hope was that when I shut down the service it would lead to some positive change. I’m going to continue fighting for a strong precedent via the court system and I’m going to continue to lobby Congress for change in the laws,” he said.


Levison was issued a secret federal court order that he is legally barred from detailing, though experts believe the order to be a sealed subpoena or national security letter which demands he cooperate with an investigation related to Snowden.


Levison told RT he fears a bleak future for secure-data services like Lavabit should US government surveillance and strong-arming of American companies continue.


It’s become clear to me over last couple of months that all of the major providers here in the US have provided our government with real-time access to private information of their user,” he said. “They don’t really have a choice about it and they don’t really have the ability to tell anybody about it. Fact is, if you trust your data to a company , even if they haven’t already been approached and been required to provide access, the simple fact is they could be in the future, unless that judicial precedent is set or Congress takes action.”


Levison said he hopes his case can help set such a legal precedent. In the meantime, he is entertaining the possibility of moving his service overseas, though he is not yet confident such an arrangement could achieve security for his customers free of US spying.


Ladar Levison.(Screenshot from RT video)


“As an American, if I were to continue running the service even if it was physically based in another country, I could still be required to compromise the security of that system and I could literally be put in a position where I’m forced to choose between breaking the laws of the country in which the service is hosted or breaking the laws of the United States,” he said.


Levison said last week he believes he could face criminal charges for refusing to comply with the secret order.


He said he thinks the American public has a right to know what the government’s doing and how it’s collecting information on its own citizens.


If I had continued to operate, I felt like it would have put me in an ethically-compromising position,” he said about his service, which he believed would no longer have been a secure, private method of communication for Americans had he continued.


Levison said he doesn’t oppose keeping an investigation secret, but he does object to the covert methods the government uses to conduct surveillance. Therefore, he felt he had no choice but to protect his customers even though the previous month, following the revelations that spawned from Snowden’s leaks about National Security Agency spying programs to The Guardian and Washington Post reporters, was Lavabit’s best in its 10-year history.


“When you say no to the government, they have the ability to take everything,” he said of defying the government by continuing Lavabit and not complying with the order. “They have the ability to take your business, take your money and take your freedom. And there really isn’t all that much you can do about it. I was looking at the very real possibility of an impossible debt and possibly being put in jail and still not being able to tell people why I was even in jail.”




RT – USA



Lavabit owner eyes legal precedent to rid cloud-data companies of govt surveillance

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Snowden writer"s partner begins legal action over UK detention


David Miranda (2nd L), partner of U.S. journalist Glenn Greenwald (L), speaks to the media at Rio de Janeiro’s International Airport August 19, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Ricardo Moraes




Reuters: Top News



Snowden writer"s partner begins legal action over UK detention

Monday, August 12, 2013

Sunday, August 11, 2013

Editor Who Published Map of Legal Gun Owners Loses Job



Last December, the Rockland County Journal News published an interactive map of everyone in the counties of Westchester and Rockland, New York that had legal gun permits on their website.  The public outrage was instant and it wasn’t long before they were forced to take the map off their site.


The damage had already been done as several gun owners found themselves the victims of burglaries.  I wrote in January asking if the Journal News was willing to accept the liability for placing legal gun owners in danger and setting them up for burglaries and home invasions.


Now it seems that the Rockland Journal News has done some summer house cleaning, according to a local competitor, the Rockland Times.  The report says that a total of 26 staff members the Journal News have been released from their jobs.  Among the casualties are 17 reporters and editor Caryn McBride.  McBride was the one responsible for the posting of the interactive map of legal gun permit holders.


McBride’s troubles started soon after the interactive map was posted.  A number of people whose homes were identified called to say that they did not have gun permits.  Upon investigation it was learned that the information they used for the map was outdated.


Then McBride called police because she claimed she was getting angry and threatening phone calls and letters.  Someone even posted a map showing the addresses and location of McBride and other Journal News employees as a retaliation for what she did.  When the police said they did not believe the threats to be credible, McBride and others at the news agency hired armed guards to protect them and their property.  This in turn caused an uproar among the area residents who pointed to the hypocrisy of the anti-gun editor hiring gun toting guards for her protection.


I’m sure many area residents will be pleased to hear the news of McBride’s dismissal and feel that it is a just reward for her actions.  However, I feel that it is not enough punishment.  Everyone whose house was identified on the map and found themselves victims of burglars or home intruders should file a lawsuit against the Journal News and against McBride for exposing them to the danger.  In doing so, hopefully others will think twice before doing something similar and putting peoples’ lives and property in danger.














Godfather Politics



Editor Who Published Map of Legal Gun Owners Loses Job

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Disabled workers paid just pennies an hour – and it"s legal


By Anna Schecter, Producer, NBC News


One of the nation’s best-known charities is paying disabled workers as little as 22 cents an hour, thanks to a 75-year-old legal loophole that critics say needs to be closed.


Goodwill Industries, a multibillion-dollar company whose executives make six-figure salaries, is among the nonprofit groups permitted to pay thousands of disabled workers far less than minimum wage because of a federal law known as Section 14 (c). Labor Department records show that some Goodwill workers in Pennsylvania earned wages as low as 22, 38 and 41 cents per hour in 2011.


“If they really do pay the CEO of Goodwill three-quarters of a million dollars, they certainly can pay me more than they’re paying,” said Harold Leigland, who is legally blind and hangs clothes at a Goodwill in Great Falls, Montana for less than minimum wage.


“It’s a question of civil rights,” added his wife, Sheila, blind from birth, who quit her job at the same Goodwill store when her already low wage was cut further. “I feel like a second-class citizen. And I hate it.”


Section 14 (c) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, which was passed in 1938, allows employers to obtain special minimum wage certificates from the Department of Labor. The certificates give employers the right to pay disabled workers according to their abilities, with no bottom limit to the wage.


Most, but not all, special wage certificates are held by nonprofit organizations like Goodwill that then set up their own so-called “sheltered workshops” for disabled employees, where employees typically perform manual tasks like hanging clothes.


For more on disabled workers and sub-minimum-wage pay watch ‘Rock Center’ tonight.


The non-profit certificate holders can also place employees in outside, for-profit workplaces including restaurants, retail stores, hospitals and even Internal Revenue Service centers. Between the sheltered workshops and the outside businesses, more than 216,000 workers are eligible to earn less than minimum wage because of Section 14 (c), though many end up earning the full federal minimum wage of $ 7.25.


NBC News



Harold Leigland, who is blind, with his guide dog on the bus during his morning commute to the Goodwill facility in Great Falls, Montana, where he works hanging clothing.




When a non-profit provides Section 14 (c) workers to an outside business, it sets the salary and pays the wages. For example, the Helen Keller National Center, a New York school for the blind and deaf, has a special wage certificate and has placed students in a Westbury, N.Y., Applebee’s franchise. The employees’ pay ranged from $ 3.97 per hour to $ 5.96 per hour in 2010. The franchise told NBC News it has also hired workers at minimum wage from Helen Keller. A spokesperson for Applebee’s declined to comment on Section 14 (c).


Helen Keller also placed several students at a Barnes & Noble bookstore in Manhasset, N.Y., in 2010, where they earned $ 3.80 and $ 4.85 an hour. A Barnes & Noble spokeswoman defended the Section 14 (c) program as providing jobs to “people who would otherwise not have [the opportunity to work].”


Most Section 14 (c) workers are employed directly by nonprofits. In 2001, the most recent year for which numbers are available, the GAO estimated that more than 90 percent of Section 14 (c) workers were employed at nonprofit work centers.


Critics of Section 14 (c) have focused much of their ire on the nonprofits, where wages can be just pennies an hour even as some of the groups receive funding from the government. At one workplace in Florida run by a nonprofit, some employees earned one cent per hour in 2011.


“People are profiting from exploiting disabled workers,” said Ari Ne’eman, president of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network. “It is clearly and unquestionably exploitation.”


Defenders of Section 14 (c) say that without it, disabled workers would have few options. A Department of Labor spokesperson said in a statement to NBC News that Section 14 (c) “provides workers with disabilities the opportunity to be given meaningful work and receive an income.”


Terry Farmer, CEO of ACCSES, a trade group that calls itself the “voice of disability service providers,” said scrapping the provision could “force [disabled workers] to stay at home,” enter rehabilitation, “or otherwise engage in unproductive and unsatisfactory activities.”


Harold Leigland, however, said he feels that Goodwill can pay him a low wage because the company knows he has few other places to go. “We are trapped,” he said. “Everybody who works at Goodwill is trapped.”


Leigland, a 66-year-old former massage therapist with a college degree, currently earns $ 5.46 per hour in Great Falls.


His wages have risen and fallen based on the method nonprofits use to calculate the salaries of Section 14 (c) workers. Staff members use a stopwatch to determine how long it takes a disabled worker to complete a task. That time is compared with how long it would take a person without a disability to do the same task. The nonprofit then uses a formula to calculate a salary, which may be equal to or less than minimum wage. The tests are repeated every six months.


NBC News



Harold Leigland works at the Goodwill facility in Great Falls, Montana, where he earns $ 5.46 an hour.




Leigland’s pay has been higher than $ 5.46, but it has also dropped down to $ 4.37 per hour, based on the time-study results.
He said he believes Goodwill makes the time studies harder when they want his wage to be lower.


“Sometimes the test is easier than others. It depends on if, as near as I can figure, they want your wage to go up or down. It’s that simple,” he said.


His wife, Sheila, 58, spent four years hanging clothes at the Great Falls Goodwill for about $ 3.50 an hour. She said the time study was one of the most degrading and stressful parts about her job. “You never know how it’s going to come out. It stressed me out a lot,” she said.


She quit last summer when she returned to work after knee surgery and found that her wage had been lowered to $ 2.75 per hour, a training rate.


“At $ 2.75 it would barely cover my cost of getting to work. I wouldn’t make any money,” she said.


Harold said he believes Goodwill can afford to pay him minimum wage, based on the salaries paid to Goodwill executives. While according to the company’s own figures about 4,000 of the 30,000 disabled workers Goodwill employs at 69 franchises are currently paid below minimum wage, salaries for the CEOs of those franchises that hold special minimum wage certificates totaled almost $ 20 million in 2011.


In 2011 the CEO of Goodwill Industries of Southern California took home $ 1.1 million in salary and deferred compensation. His counterpart in Portland, Oregon, made more than $ 500,000. Salaries for CEOs of the roughly 150 Goodwill franchises across America total more than $ 30 million.


Goodwill International CEO Jim Gibbons, who was awarded $ 729,000 in salary and deferred compensation in 2011, defended the executive pay.


“These leaders are having a great impact in terms of new solutions, in terms of innovation, and in terms of job creation,” he said.


Gibbons also defended time studies, and the whole Section 14 (c) approach. He said that for many people who make less than minimum wage, the experience of work is more important than the pay.


“It’s typically not about their livelihood. It’s about their fulfillment. It’s about being a part of something. And it’s probably a small part of their overall program,” he said.


Read Goodwill’s full statement


And Goodwill and the organizations that run the sheltered workshops are not alone in their support for Section 14 (c). In many cases, the families of the workers who have severe disabilities say their loved ones enjoy the work experience, enjoy getting a paycheck, and the amount is of no consequence.


NBC News



Sheila Leigland, who is blind, with her guide dog. She quit her job at Goodwill in Great Falls, Montana, after her hourly wage was lowered to $ 2.75.




“I feel really good about it. I don’t have to worry so much about him,” said Fran Davidson, whose son Jeremy has worked at Goodwill in Great Falls, Montana, for more than a decade. “I know he’s not getting picked on, and he’s in a safe place. He enjoys what he’s doing, and he’s happy, and that’s what we like for our kids.” Jeremy started out working for a sub-minimum wage but did well on his last time study and is currently earning $ 7.80 an hour, Montana’s minimum wage.


But foes of Section 14 (c) have hopes for a new bill that’s now before Congress that would repeal Section 14 (c) and make sub-minimum wages illegal across the board.


“Meaningful work deserves fair pay,” the sponsor of the bill, Rep. Gregg Harper, R.-Miss., told NBC News. “This dated provision unjustly prohibits workers with disabilities from reaching their full potential.”


The bill is opposed by trade associations for the employers of the disabled, and past attempts to change the law have failed. But Marc Maurer, president of the National Federation of the Blind and a foe of the sheltered workshop system, is cautiously optimistic that this time the bill will pass, and end what he called a “two-tiered system.”


That system, explained Maurer, says “‘Americans who have disabilities aren’t as valuable as other people,’ and that’s wrong. These folks have value. We should recognize that value.”


Monica Alba contributed to this report.


More from Open Channel:


Follow Open Channel from NBCNews.com on Twitter and Facebook



Investigate this!


Read and vote on readers’ story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.





Investigations



Disabled workers paid just pennies an hour – and it"s legal