Showing posts with label Address. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Address. Show all posts

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Weekly Address: The President’s Budget Ensures Opportunity for All Hardworking Americans


In this week’s address, the President highlighted the important differences between the budget he’s put forward — built on opportunity for all — and the budget House Republicans are advocating for, which stacks the deck against the middle class.


While the President is focused on building lasting economic security and ensuring that hardworking Americans have the opportunity to get ahead, Republicans are advancing the same old top-down approach of cutting taxes for the wealthiest Americans and slashing important investments in education, infrastructure, and research and development.


Transcript | mp4 | mp3





White House.gov Blog Feed



Weekly Address: The President’s Budget Ensures Opportunity for All Hardworking Americans

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Analysis of Obama"s Second Inaugural Address




“A time comes when silence is betrayal.”-Martin Luther King Jr.


I wanted to give my analysis on President Obama’s second inauguration speech. From having a minor in communications and having some experience in public speaking I must admit that it was a well written and well delivered speech. The speech invoked feelings of nationalism and American exceptional-ism  It contained something for everybody, it gave each group something they wanted to hear. It was a great speech, it was also a great con. His words were hollow. He gave lip service to the Declaration of Independence, to equality of mankind, to the unalienable rights of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”, when he denies those rights to thousands of people in this country and around the world on a daily basis, he dared to mention the patriots of 1776, and invoked the memory of the great Dr. Martin Luther King. However, he is not worthy of even talking of their sacrifices because he continues to deface their legacy and has made their blood of those martyrs of the struggle for human dignity and freedom in vain.

Last year Obama signed a bill H.R. 347criminalizing protest near certain politicians receiving Secret Service protection, crippling forever the 1st amendment.  He extended the Patriot Act which destroys the 4th amendment. He signed the NDAA indefinite detention into law and appealed to keep the power after a federal court Judge struck it down as unconstitutional. He has a not so secret kill list and has claimed to have the authority to assassinate American citizens by his sole judgment, denying them trial or due process. He also has continued the Bush era policies of extraordinary rendition and torture. Together that eliminates the 5th, 6th, 7th, & 8th amendments. He has assumed for himself power to dictate and create law via executive order like the National Defense Resources Preparedness Executive Order, which allows him to take over EVERY resource in the nation including people, infrastructure, food, energy, EVERYTHING, even in times of peace. It is important to note executive orders was something he denounced Bush for during the 2008 campaign. He has continued the racist war on drugs in violation of some state laws and the will of the people, there goes the 9th and 10th amendments. The last one that is hanging by a thread is the 2nd and he and the rest of the New World Order traitors are coming for that too. Even while claiming to respect our unalienable rights in subtle language called the clear and absolute 2nd Amendment obsolete in his speech. As you can see he has continued the International Elites agenda of the destruction of our Republic and the entire Bill of Rights started by his predecessors. Every reference to our Constitution, Declaration of Independence, unalienable rights, our principles and creed as a nation were empty words meant to deceive the people.

On war he said a decade of war was ending, but his administration has already extended troop presence in Afghanistan past 2014. He said that security does not require perpetual war yet he has personally escalated drone strikes on nations with which we are not at war, killing thousands of civilians and hundreds of them children. He executed an illegal unconstitutional war against a sovereign nation in Libya which has now sparked a genocide of black Libyans and led to the murder of our ambassador by the same terrorists they armed in Benghazi. He also continues to arm and fund Islamic extremists in attempt to bring down the sovereign government of Syria. His administration provided the assault weapons for the Mexican drug war with the “Fast and Furious” program. In his speech he said we will remain engaged and be the anchor for our alliances around the globe which itself will inevitably require perpetual war. When he says war is ending he only means covert operations will be ramping up. Martin Luther King who was staunchly anti-war would be turning in his grave to see this war criminal use his birthday and his legacy, while at the same time bringing war and death to hundreds of thousands around the globe.


I know many of you reading this will not be fooled by the confirmed mass hypnosis techniques of pacing and leading of his delivery or deceived by the words of the speech which are agreeable to almost everyone and taken solely within the context of the speech they are not by themselves false, you will see through the illusion because you already know that all of it is a cleverly crafted lie, and that the reality of his actions are the polar opposite of his words. For those of you who are only now awakening to Orwellian nightmare we find ourselves in, I hope this analysis helps to make sense out of the doublespeak. The whole situation reminds me of the old axiom “wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them”.

“Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.”-Matthew 7:15

Written by Truth Soldier
Guest Writer
The Controversy



Analysis of Obama"s Second Inaugural Address

Monday, January 27, 2014

For Obama, an address focused on what"s achievable








The Capitol is seen from the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, as Congress resumes work. On Tuesday, President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





The Capitol is seen from the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, as Congress resumes work. On Tuesday, President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio leaves the House chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, after hearing the resignation letter submitted by Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla. Radel, whose district includes the Florida Gulf Coast communities of Fort Myers and Naples, was caught buying cocaine in November from an undercover federal agent in Washington. Tomorrow, President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





FILE – In this Jan. 25, 2011 file-pool photo, President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill in Washington. Is “strong” losing its strength? Presidents of both parties have long felt compelled to sum up the state of the union with a descriptive word or two in their State of the Union addresses. Mostly the same word. For many years now, “strong” has been the go-to adjective. Vice President Joe Biden is at left, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio is at right. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File-Pool)





The Capitol Rotunda looms over the statue of George Washington on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, as the House and Senate resume work in Washington. President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address Tuesday night to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — No longer about bold ambitions, this year’s State of the Union address will focus more on what’s actually achievable.


For the White House, that dose of realism is aimed at avoiding a repeat of 2013, when a long list of unfulfilled policy goals — including gun control and an immigration overhaul — dragged President Barack Obama down like an anchor. Tuesday’s prime-time address will focus instead on redefining success for Obama — not by what he can jam through Congress but rather by what he can accomplish through his own presidential powers.


He is expected to announce executive actions on job training, retirement security and help for the long-term unemployed in finding work. All are part of the White House focus this year on boosting economic mobility and narrowing the income gap between the wealthy and the poor.


“Tomorrow night, it’s time to restore opportunity for all,” Obama said Monday on the video-sharing site Vine, part of the White House’s broad social media promotion of the speech.


“I think the way we have to think about this year is we have a divided government,” White House senior adviser Dan Pfeiffer said. “The Republican Congress is not going to rubber-stamp the president’s agenda. The president is not going to sign the Republican Congress’ agenda.”


The address, delivered before a joint session of Congress and millions of Americans watching on television and the Internet, typically garners a president his largest audience of the year. It also provides perhaps his best opportunity to try to persuade skeptical Americans that he still wields substantial power in Washington, even if he can’t break through a divided Congress.


The risk for Obama in centering his agenda on his own executive actions is that those directives often are more limited in scope than legislation that requires congressional approval. And that raises questions about how much impact he can have.


For example, Obama can collect commitments from businesses to consider hiring the long-term unemployed, as he’ll announce Tuesday night, but without the help of Congress he can’t restore expired jobless benefits for those Americans while they look for work.


White House officials insist executive actions should not automatically be pegged as small bore, pointing in particular to steps the president can take on climate change, including stricter regulations on power plants and new car efficiency standards. And some Democrats are cheering the strategy, saying it’s time for Obama to look beyond Capitol Hill after spending more than half his time in office mired in congressional gridlock.


“They spent far too much time actually trying to think they could negotiate with House and Senate Republicans,” said Jim Manley, a longtime adviser to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “I, for one, am glad that they finally decided to go around Congress to the extent possible.”


Not surprisingly, Republicans have been dismissive of the president’s go-it-alone approach.


Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., suggested that some executive actions might run up against legal challenges, saying Congress should insist Obama “find the Constitution and follow it.” And House Speaker John Boehner’s office said the strategy was simply a rehash of earlier Obama efforts to focus on executive authority when action in Congress stalled, including a 2011 effort that the White House branded, “We Can’t Wait.”


Obama aides say this year’s push will be more extensive than in the past. White House officials have been trying to boost involvement by often-sidelined Cabinet members, and the president has brought in John Podesta, a prominent advocate for executive action, to serve as a senior adviser for one year.


Obama won’t be abandoning Congress completely. He’s expected to make another appeal during the State of the Union for passage of a sweeping immigration bill, which stalled in the House after getting through the Senate last summer. The president also is likely to make a new pitch for two proposals that got little traction after they were first announced in last year’s address to Congress: expanding access to early childhood education and increasing the federal minimum wage from $ 7.25 an hour to at least $ 10 an hour.


There are glimmers of hope for him on at least some of those issues. House Republicans are readying their own immigration proposal addressing border security, increased visas for high-skilled workers and legalization for some of the 11 million immigrants living in the U.S. illegally, though stopping short of providing a pathway to citizenship. And with some GOP lawmakers also increasingly focused on economic inequality issues, White House officials say conditions could be right this year for pursuing a minimum wage increase.


Obama will follow his State of the Union address with a quick trip Wednesday and Thursday to Maryland, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Tennessee. In Maryland, he’ll visit a Costco where he’s expected to discuss job training programs and in Pittsburgh, he’ll speak at the U. S. Steel Irvin Plant, where he’s likely to tout initiatives to boost manufacturing.


On Friday, Obama will hold an event at the White House where he’ll announce commitments from several companies to not discriminate against the long-term unemployed during hiring.


In keeping with tradition, the White House has invited several people to sit with first lady Michelle Obama during Tuesday night’s address. Among them are two survivors of the Boston Marathon bombing, a teenager who stole the show at a White House science fair with his “extreme marshmallow cannon,” and Jason Collins, an openly gay professional basketball player.


___


Associated Press writer Donna Cassata contributed to this report.


___


Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


Associated Press




Top Headlines



For Obama, an address focused on what"s achievable

For Obama, an address focused on what"s achievable




The Capitol is seen from the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, as Congress resumes work. On Tuesday, President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





The Capitol is seen from the Russell Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, as Congress resumes work. On Tuesday, President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio leaves the House chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, after hearing the resignation letter submitted by Rep. Trey Radel, R-Fla. Radel, whose district includes the Florida Gulf Coast communities of Fort Myers and Naples, was caught buying cocaine in November from an undercover federal agent in Washington. Tomorrow, President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





The Capitol Rotunda looms over the statue of George Washington on Capitol Hill in Washington, Monday, Jan. 27, 2014, as the House and Senate resume work in Washington. President Barack Obama will deliver his State of the Union address Tuesday night to a joint session of Congress. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





FILE – In this Jan. 25, 2011 file-pool photo, President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address on Capitol Hill in Washington. Is “strong” losing its strength? Presidents of both parties have long felt compelled to sum up the state of the union with a descriptive word or two in their State of the Union addresses. Mostly the same word. For many years now, “strong” has been the go-to adjective. Vice President Joe Biden is at left, House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio is at right. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File-Pool)





Politics Headlines



For Obama, an address focused on what"s achievable

Monday, December 9, 2013

Caught on Video: Educator Admits Common Core Does Not Address Special Needs Students

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Caught on Video: Educator Admits Common Core Does Not Address Special Needs Students

Saturday, October 12, 2013

GOP Weekly Address: Rep. Buck McKeon On Tackling Debt & Reopening The Government


GOP: This week, both parties came together to make sure that the families of those who gave the ultimate sacrifice for our country were given the benefits they deserve. This bipartisanship should continue, both as we look towards ways at reopening our entire government, and as we tackle our nation’s enormous debt. After all, sitting down and resolving our differences is exactly what Americans expect their leaders to do.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



GOP Weekly Address: Rep. Buck McKeon On Tackling Debt & Reopening The Government

GOP Weekly Address: Rep. Buck McKeon On Tackling Debt & Reopening The Government


GOP: This week, both parties came together to make sure that the families of those who gave the ultimate sacrifice for our country were given the benefits they deserve. This bipartisanship should continue, both as we look towards ways at reopening our entire government, and as we tackle our nation’s enormous debt. After all, sitting down and resolving our differences is exactly what Americans expect their leaders to do.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



GOP Weekly Address: Rep. Buck McKeon On Tackling Debt & Reopening The Government

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Warning: Enrolling in Obamacare allows government to link your IP address with your name, social security number, bank accounts and web surfing habits






(NaturalNews) We have already established that Healthcare.gov is not a functioning database application that allows people to shop for competing health plans. It is actually a government-run Trojan Horse that suckers people into creating accounts where they hand over:

• Name and address
• Email address and password
• Social security number
• Private bank account details
• Employer details and other information


During the enrollment process, your computer also hands over your IP address which is then tied to your social security number.


This IP address is then handed over to the NSA thanks to its new mega-black-hole data center in Utah, where your IP is cross-referenced with all website visits, including:


• “Anti-government” websites
• Porn sites
• Gambling sites
• File sharing sites
• “Terrorism” support sites
• Encryption service sites like Hushmail
• Chat rooms, message boards and more


Armed with this information, the NSA can then link your seemingly-anonymous online chats, comments and posts with your social security number. Linguistic algorithms can “score” your online posts to create red flags that call for additional investigations of anyone using words like “liberty” or “patriot.”


This information can then be turned over to law enforcement, as is found in the fine print of the Maryland Obamacare exchange, which states:


…we may share information provided in your application with the appropriate authorities for law enforcement and audit activities.


Thus, by enrolling in Obamacare, you are voluntarily surveilling yourself and handing over the data to the government while also AGREEING to terms of self-incrimination.


Ponder the implications of this for a moment…



Obamacare is the meta-level con of tricking Americans into thinking they’re signing up for free health insurance when, in reality, the website primarily exists to scrape personal financial details, passwords, emails and social security numbers from Americans who will later be targeted by the government itself.

All the emails registered with Healthcare.gov, for example, will likely be used by the Obama administration to spam people with political propaganda or contrived “terror alerts” that use fear to concentrate more power in the hands of government.


All the financial data will be turned over to the IRS for criminal investigations of Americans who are suspected of under-reporting their incomes (or supporting “patriot” groups with financial donations).


All the passwords used on Healthcare.gov will be turned over to the NSA and matched up with individual IP addresses so that NSA operatives can hack into private bank accounts, encrypted email accounts and other private data, based on the assumption that most users use identical passwords across all the websites they commonly access. (A person’s password under Obamacare probably has a 50% chance of also working for their online banking. And since the NSA has your social security number, it’s a no-brainer to match up your online surfing habits with your phone number, home address, investment holdings, tax returns, international travel history and so on.)


In essence, Obamacare allows the government to gather a goldmine of private data that can be exploited to target, punish, incriminate, blackmail or steal from any desired target.


As this is a federal government that believes it now has total power to do anything it wants without limit, there are no boundaries of what it might do with this data. Remember, Obama is the president who literally maintains “kill lists” of Americans to have terminated. This is openly admitted and confirmed. The Obama administration also believes it can bypass Congress and simply create new law by executive order, concentrating all power into its own hands with no regard for the separation of power upon which this nation was founded.


As is common with tyrants, the Obama administration truly believes the People have no right to privacy, no right to due process, no right to representation in government and no right to determine your own engagement in commerce. This is why Obama is playing such hardball to shove Obamacare down everybody’s throats: the government desperately needs to gather all this surveillance data so that it can leverage it to blackmail members of the U.S. Supreme Court, the Senate, the House, and even federal judges. Blackmail is essential to maintaining power in a corrupt society. And Healthcare.gov is the portal for scraping passwords, IP addresses and even financial details from anyone gullible enough to actually hand this over to government (i.e. democrats).


As far as I’m concerned, the IRS can fine me all they want. I’m never voluntarily enrolling in Obamacare, even if you put a gun to my head like Obama is doing to the entire nation right now with this insane, contrived government shutdown that treats our own veterans like dirt.


All dignity is now gone from the Obama administration. Zero credibility remains. The government has all but openly declared war on the People and is actively using tricks like Healthcare.gov to coerce people into incriminating themselves. The Obama administration is out of control and a grave danger to society. It must be lawfully stopped from damaging America any further.


Now is the time to seriously discuss impeachment, not just of the President but of every U.S. Senator and House member who voted for this unconstitutional, “Trojan Horse” health care system that’s destroying America’s economy and wasting an unprecedented amount of time, money and effort. End Obamacare now and restore dignity and justice to America.






About the author:
Mike Adams (aka the “Health Ranger“) is the founding editor of NaturalNews.com, the internet’s No. 1 natural health news website, now reaching 7 million unique readers a month.



With a background in science and software technology, Adams is the original founder of the email newsletter technology company known as Arial Software. Using his technical experience combined with his love for natural health, Adams developed and deployed the content management system currently driving NaturalNews.com. He also engineered the high-level statistical algorithms that power SCIENCE.naturalnews.com, a massive research resource now featuring over 10 million scientific studies.



In addition to being the co-star of the popular GAIAM TV series called Secrets to Health, Adams is also the (non-paid) executive director of the non-profit Consumer Wellness Center (CWC), an organization that redirects 100% of its donations receipts to grant programs that teach children and women how to grow their own food or vastly improve their nutrition. Click here to see some of the CWC success stories.



In 2013, Adams created the Natural News Forensic Food Laboratory, a research lab that analyzes common foods and supplements, reporting the results to the public. He is well known for his incredibly popular consumer activism video blowing the lid on fake blueberries used throughout the food supply. He has also exposed “strange fibers” found in Chicken McNuggets, fake academic credentials of so-called health “gurus,” dangerous “detox” products imported as battery acid and sold for oral consumption, fake acai berry scams, the California raw milk raids, the vaccine research fraud revealed by industry whistleblowers and many other topics.



Adams has also helped defend the rights of home gardeners and protect the medical freedom rights of parents. Adams is widely recognized to have made a remarkable global impact on issues like GMOs, vaccines, nutrition therapies, human consciousness.



In addition to his activism, Adams is an accomplished musician who has released ten popular songs covering a variety of activism topics.



Click here to read a more detailed bio on Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, at HealthRanger.com.







Have comments on this article? Post them here:







comments powered by Disqus








Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID Tags | Amazon Affiliate

NaturalNews.com

Warning: Enrolling in Obamacare allows government to link your IP address with your name, social security number, bank accounts and web surfing habits

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Government powers down; Obama to address country







A US Park Police officer walks behind a barricade with sign reading “Because of the Federal Government SHUTDOWN All National Parks are Closed” in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013. Congress plunged the nation into a partial government shutdown Tuesday as a long-running dispute over President Barack Obama’s health care law stalled a temporary funding bill, forcing about 800,000 federal workers off the job and suspending most non-essential federal programs and services. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)





A US Park Police officer walks behind a barricade with sign reading “Because of the Federal Government SHUTDOWN All National Parks are Closed” in front of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013. Congress plunged the nation into a partial government shutdown Tuesday as a long-running dispute over President Barack Obama’s health care law stalled a temporary funding bill, forcing about 800,000 federal workers off the job and suspending most non-essential federal programs and services. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)





A US Park Police officer ties police tape to a hand rail closing access to the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013. Congress plunged the nation into a partial government shutdown Tuesday as a long-running dispute over President Barack Obama’s health care law stalled a temporary funding bill, forcing about 800,000 federal workers off the job and suspending most non-essential federal programs and services. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)





House Majority Leader Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., left, and House Majority Whip Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., rear center, look on as Speaker of the House Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, pauses during a news conference on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013 in Washington. Congress was unable to reach a midnight deadline to keep the government funded, triggering the first government shutdown in more than 17 years. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)





House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., center, squeezes between Rep. Joe Crowley, D-N.Y., left, and Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., right, as they return to negotiations following a news conference just before midnight at the Capitol in Washington, Monday, Sept. 30, 2013. For the first time in nearly two decades, the federal government staggered into a partial shutdown Monday at midnight after congressional Republicans stubbornly demanded changes in the nation’s health care law as the price for essential federal funding and President Barack Obama and Democrats adamantly refused. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)





The Capital is mirrored in the Capital Reflecting Pool on Capitol Hill in Washington early Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013. Congress plunged the nation into a partial government shutdown Tuesday as a long-running dispute over President Barack Obama’s health care law stalled a temporary funding bill, forcing about 800,000 federal workers off the job and suspending most non-essential federal programs and services. (AP Photo/J. David Ake)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Congress plunged the nation into a partial government shutdown Tuesday as a protracted dispute over President Barack Obama’s signature health care law reached a boiling point, forcing some 800,000 federal workers off the job. Obama readied a midday statement to the nation as Democrats and Republicans maintained their blame-each-other duel on Capitol Hill.


Even as Obama prepared to meet with citizens signing up for his health care program and then make a lunch-hour speech in the Rose Garden, the White House cut back to a skeletal staff. The U.S. Capitol canceled tours not personally led by Congress members. “Closed” signs and barricades sprang up at the Lincoln Memorial, and national parks and federal workplaces across the country were following suit.


With the Republican-controlled House and Democratic-controlled Senate stalemated, it was unclear how long the shutdown — and the loss of some government programs and services — could last. The Senate early Tuesday rejected the House’s call to form a negotiating committee to resolve the deadlock.


Moments after the vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., laid full blame on House Republicans, declaring, “The government is closed because of the irrationality of what’s going on on the other side of the Capitol.”


Obama communications director Jennifer Palmieri told MSNBC that the White House was open to changes in the health care law in future negotiations, but not as part of passing a budget bill. She compared that to negotiating with “a gun pointed to your head.”


In the House, conservative Rep. Marsha Blackburn predicted the standoff would drag on if Obama and Senate Democrats refused to bargain.


“You may see a partial shutdown for several days,” Blackburn, R-Tenn., told Fox News. “People are going to realize they can live with a lot less government.”


The health care law itself was unaffected as enrollment opened Tuesday for millions of people shopping for medical insurance.


It was the first shutdown since a budget battle between Republicans in Congress and Democratic President Bill Clinton in the winter of 1995-1996.


Traffic was lighter and the subway less crowded in Washington Tuesday morning. The Smithsonian museums website displayed a red banner noting that “all Smithsonian museums and the National Zoo are closed.” On the zoo’s website, panda mom Mei Xiang could be seen snuggling with her weeks-old cub through the morning, until the feed was abruptly cut off around 8 a.m. Care of the animals will continue.


Agencies like NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency were being nearly shuttered. People classified as essential government employees — such as air traffic controllers, Border Patrol agents and most food inspectors — will continue to work.


U.S. embassies and consulates will continue to issue visas and service passports because these activities are supported by fees not subject to congressional appropriations, according to State Department officials.


The White House was operating with a skeletal staff, including household workers taking care of the first family’s residence and presidential aides working in the West Wing. A groundskeeper working outside Tuesday morning at daybreak said he was doing the job normally handled by four workers.


Given the shutdown, White House officials were discussing whether President Barack Obama should change plans for a trip to Asia scheduled to begin Saturday.


The military will be paid under legislation freshly signed by Obama, but paychecks for other federal workers will be withheld until the impasse is broken. Federal workers were told to report to their jobs for a half-day but to perform only shutdown tasks like changing email greetings and closing down agencies’ Internet sites.


The self-funded Postal Service will continue to operate and the government will continue to pay Social Security benefits and Medicare and Medicaid fees to doctors on time.


On Capitol Hill, lawmakers get to decide which of their staff members keep working and which are furloughed. Members of Congress will continue getting paid.


There were no “Closed” signs outside the Capitol or its adjacent visitor center early Tuesday warning tourists they would not be admitted for the usual tours. “That would be me,” quipped one Capitol Police officer standing outside an entrance.


The Senate twice on Monday rejected House-passed bills that first sought to delay key portions of the 2010 “Obamacare” law, then to delay the law’s requirement that millions of people buy medical insurance. The House passed the last version again early Tuesday naming negotiators for a Senate-House conference on the bill; Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said the same fate awaits that measure when the Senate reconvenes Tuesday morning.


“You don’t get to extract a ransom for doing your job, for doing what you’re supposed to be doing anyway, or just because there’s a law there that you don’t like,” Obama said Monday, delivering a similar message in private phone calls later to Republican House Speaker John Boehner and other lawmakers.


Boehner said he didn’t want a government shutdown, but added the health care law “is having a devastating impact. … Something has to be done.”


It wasn’t clear how long the standoff would last, but it appeared that Obama and Reid had the upper hand.


“We can’t win,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., adding that “sooner or later” the House would have to agree to Democrats’ demands for a simple, straightforward funding bill reopening the government.


Another veteran Republican, Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, called the shutdown “a big mistake.” Interviewed on MSNBC, Cole called on House and Senate negotiations to end the impasse and insisted Democrats should yield on delaying the requirement that individual Americans have health coverage.


The order directing federal agencies to “execute plans for an orderly shutdown due to the absence of appropriations” was issued by White House Budget Director Sylvia Burwell shortly before midnight Monday.


Around the same time, Obama appeared in a video message assuring members of the military they’ll be paid under a law he just signed and telling civilian Defense Department employees that “you and your families deserve better than the dysfunction we’re seeing in Congress.”


Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said Tuesday that Pentagon lawyers are trying to determine ways for some of the Defense Department’s 400,000 furloughed civilians to continue working.


He bemoaned the standoff, telling reporters traveling with him in South Korea, “It does have an effect on our relationships around the world and it cuts straight to the obvious question: Can you rely on the United States as a reliable partner to fulfill its commitments to its allies?”


The underlying spending bill would fund the government through Nov. 15 if the Senate gets its way or until Dec. 15 if the House does.


Until now, such bills have been routinely passed with bipartisan support, ever since a pair of shutdowns 17 years ago engineered by then-Speaker Newt Gingrich severely damaged Republican election prospects and revived then-President Bill Clinton’s political standing.


Boehner had sought to avoid the shutdown and engineer passage of a “clean” temporary spending bill for averting a government shutdown.


This time tea party activists mobilized by freshman Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, mounted a campaign to seize the must-do measure in an effort to derail Obamacare. GOP leaders voiced reservations and many Republican lawmakers predicted it wouldn’t work. Some even labeled it “stupid.”


But the success of Cruz and other tea party-endorsed conservatives who upset establishment GOP candidates in 2010 and 2012 primaries was a lesson learned for many Republican lawmakers going into next year’s election.


___


Associated Press writer Lolita C. Baldor in Seoul, South Korea, contributed to this report.


Associated Press




U.S. Headlines



Government powers down; Obama to address country

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Obama Weekly Address: "Indications Of Progress" On Syria


WHITE HOUSE: In his weekly address, President Obama followed up on his speech to the nation on Tuesday and said there is the possibility for a diplomatic solution in Syria, partially because of the credible threat of U.S. military force.


PRESIDENT OBAMA: This week, when I addressed the nation on Syria, I said that – in part because of the credible threat of U.S. military force – there is the possibility of a diplomatic solution. Russia has indicated a new willingness to join with the international community in pushing Syria to give up its chemical weapons, which the Assad regime used in an attack that killed more than 1,000 people on August 21. I also asked Congress to postpone a vote on the use of military force while we pursue this diplomatic path. And that’s what we’re doing.


At my direction, Secretary of State Kerry is in discussions with his Russian counterpart. But we’re making it clear that this can’t be a stalling tactic. Any agreement needs to verify that the Assad regime and Russia are keeping their commitments: that means working to turn Syria’s chemical weapons over to international control and ultimately destroying them. This would allow us to achieve our goal – deterring the Syrian regime from using chemical weapons, degrading their ability to use them, and making it clear to the world that we won’t tolerate their use.


We’ve seen indications of progress. As recently as a week ago, the Assad regime would not admit that it possessed chemical weapons. Today, it does. Syria has signaled a willingness to join with 189 other nations, representing 98 percent of humanity, in abiding by an international agreement that prohibits the use of chemical weapons. And Russia has staked its own credibility on supporting this outcome.


These are all positive developments. We’ll keep working with the international community to see that Assad gives up his chemical weapons so that they can be destroyed. We will continue rallying support from allies around the world who agree on the need for action to deter the use of chemical weapons in Syria. And if current discussions produce a serious plan, I’m prepared to move forward with it.


But we are not just going to take Russia and Assad’s word for it. We need to see concrete actions to demonstrate that Assad is serious about giving up his chemical weapons. And since this plan emerged only with a credible threat of U.S. military action, we will maintain our military posture in the region to keep the pressure on the Assad regime. And if diplomacy fails, the United States and the international community must remain prepared to act.


The use of chemical weapons anywhere in the world is an affront to human dignity and a threat to the security of people everywhere. As I have said for weeks, the international community must respond to this outrage. A dictator must not be allowed to gas children in their beds with impunity. And we cannot risk poison gas becoming the new weapon of choice for tyrants and terrorists the world over.


We have a duty to preserve a world free from the fear of chemical weapons for our children. But if there is any chance of achieving that goal without resorting to force, then I believe we have a responsibility to pursue that path. Thank you.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Obama Weekly Address: "Indications Of Progress" On Syria

Obama Weekly Address: "Indications Of Progress" On Syria


WHITE HOUSE: In his weekly address, President Obama followed up on his speech to the nation on Tuesday and said there is the possibility for a diplomatic solution in Syria, partially because of the credible threat of U.S. military force.


PRESIDENT OBAMA: This week, when I addressed the nation on Syria, I said that – in part because of the credible threat of U.S. military force – there is the possibility of a diplomatic solution. Russia has indicated a new willingness to join with the international community in pushing Syria to give up its chemical weapons, which the Assad regime used in an attack that killed more than 1,000 people on August 21. I also asked Congress to postpone a vote on the use of military force while we pursue this diplomatic path. And that’s what we’re doing.


At my direction, Secretary of State Kerry is in discussions with his Russian counterpart. But we’re making it clear that this can’t be a stalling tactic. Any agreement needs to verify that the Assad regime and Russia are keeping their commitments: that means working to turn Syria’s chemical weapons over to international control and ultimately destroying them. This would allow us to achieve our goal – deterring the Syrian regime from using chemical weapons, degrading their ability to use them, and making it clear to the world that we won’t tolerate their use.


We’ve seen indications of progress. As recently as a week ago, the Assad regime would not admit that it possessed chemical weapons. Today, it does. Syria has signaled a willingness to join with 189 other nations, representing 98 percent of humanity, in abiding by an international agreement that prohibits the use of chemical weapons. And Russia has staked its own credibility on supporting this outcome.


These are all positive developments. We’ll keep working with the international community to see that Assad gives up his chemical weapons so that they can be destroyed. We will continue rallying support from allies around the world who agree on the need for action to deter the use of chemical weapons in Syria. And if current discussions produce a serious plan, I’m prepared to move forward with it.


But we are not just going to take Russia and Assad’s word for it. We need to see concrete actions to demonstrate that Assad is serious about giving up his chemical weapons. And since this plan emerged only with a credible threat of U.S. military action, we will maintain our military posture in the region to keep the pressure on the Assad regime. And if diplomacy fails, the United States and the international community must remain prepared to act.


The use of chemical weapons anywhere in the world is an affront to human dignity and a threat to the security of people everywhere. As I have said for weeks, the international community must respond to this outrage. A dictator must not be allowed to gas children in their beds with impunity. And we cannot risk poison gas becoming the new weapon of choice for tyrants and terrorists the world over.


We have a duty to preserve a world free from the fear of chemical weapons for our children. But if there is any chance of achieving that goal without resorting to force, then I believe we have a responsibility to pursue that path. Thank you.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Obama Weekly Address: "Indications Of Progress" On Syria

GOP Weekly Address: Rep. Black On Preventing Fraud & Abuse In Obamacare


GOP: In this week’s address, Rep. Diane Black (R-TN) discusses legislation passed by the House in a bipartisan vote to protect taxpayers by preventing fraud and abuse in ObamaCare.


REP. DIANE BLACK: “Hi, I’m Diane Black, and I represent Tennessee’s Sixth Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. What an honor it is to be speaking with you.


“Protecting taxpayer dollars is one of Washington’s most important responsibilities. Your money should be spent wisely or not at all. And everything we do to stop waste and fix broken government removes obstacles to creating jobs and building a stronger economy.


“This week, the House took on a hot spot for fraud and abuse in the president’s health care law by passing a bill I authored called the No Subsidies Without Verification Act. This legislation stops the government from issuing health care subsidies until it has a system in place to prevent fraud. It’s that simple.


“Now, you’d be right to ask, why isn’t this the case already? Well, in an attempt to prop up its struggling health care law, the Obama administration decided they’d hand out subsidies without verifying who’s eligible. They just want to rely on the honor system. You heard that right: instead of exercising common sense and accountability, the Administration is willing to just give away your tax dollars – no questions asked.


“Not only is that unfair to hardworking taxpayers like you, it opens the door a mile wide to fraud and abuse. According to one independent estimate, some 250 billion dollars in bad payments could be doled out over the next decade.


“This is nonsense. And members of both parties agree. Democrats on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee have also come out for requiring verification. Now we need the full Democratic-led Senate to act.


“This is just the latest in a string of bipartisan efforts to repeal and protect Americans from the president’s health care law. The House has also acted in bipartisan fashion to give individuals and families the same delay from the law’s mandates that big businesses have received. The president himself has signed seven bills that dismantle parts of the law.


“It’s important work, and like many of you, this issue affects me personally. I’ve been a registered nurse for more than 40 years now, and I can tell you the things patients and their families count on – their doctors, their plans, the cost of their care – all of this comes under siege in the president’s health care law. It won’t just fail to keep its promises; it will make things much worse. You don’t have to take my word for it: every day we’re seeing new reports of higher costs, less access, and fewer jobs.


“Together, we can stop this ‘train wreck’ and put the focus back on patient-centered solutions. Together, we can build a stronger economy that rewards hard work and people who do the right thing.


“Again, it has been my honor to address you on behalf of my colleagues. Thank you for listening.”




RealClearPolitics Video Log



GOP Weekly Address: Rep. Black On Preventing Fraud & Abuse In Obamacare

Saturday, September 7, 2013

Weekly Address: Calling for Limited Military Action in Syria

JUMP TO:






White House.gov Blog Feed



Weekly Address: Calling for Limited Military Action in Syria

Sen. Barrasso Delivers Weekly GOP Address On How Obamacare Hurts Families


GOP: Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming says that many families are going to have “sticker shock” when they see what they’ll have to pay for health insurance under government insurance exchanges that go into effect in less than a month as part of Obamacare. In the Weekly Republican Address, Sen. Barrasso, a practicing physician for 25 years before coming to Congress, notes that the President refuses to acknowledge that Obamacare “fails to solve the number one concern of Americans when it comes to health care — which is cost.”


The American people have a choice, says Senator Barrasso — embrace Obamacare for four more years, or repeal the law and move quickly to help people get the care they need, from a doctor they choose, at lower cost. “That’s what Republicans are fighting for,” he says. “It’s time for Democrats to join us.”




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Sen. Barrasso Delivers Weekly GOP Address On How Obamacare Hurts Families

Obama Weekly Address: Syria "A Serious Threat To Our National Security"


White House: In his weekly address, President Obama makes the case for limited and targeted military action to hold the Assad regime accountable for its violation of international norms prohibiting the use of chemical weapons.


Almost three weeks ago in Syria, more than 1,000 innocent people – including hundreds of children – were murdered in the worst chemical weapons attack of the 21st century. And the United States has presented a powerful case to the world that the Syrian government was responsible for this horrific attack on its own people.


This was not only a direct attack on human dignity; it is a serious threat to our national security. There’s a reason governments representing 98 percent of the world’s people have agreed to ban the use of chemical weapons. Not only because they cause death and destruction in the most indiscriminate and inhumane way possible – but because they can also fall into the hands of terrorist groups who wish to do us harm.


That’s why, last weekend, I announced that, as Commander in Chief, I decided that the United States should take military action against the Syrian regime. This is not a decision I made lightly. Deciding to use military force is the most solemn decision we can make as a nation.


As the leader of the world’s oldest Constitutional democracy, I also know that our country will be stronger if we act together, and our actions will be more effective. That’s why I asked Members of Congress to debate this issue and vote on authorizing the use of force.


What we’re talking about is not an open-ended intervention. This would not be another Iraq or Afghanistan. There would be no American boots on the ground. Any action we take would be limited, both in time and scope – designed to deter the Syrian government from gassing its own people again and degrade its ability to do so.


I know that the American people are weary after a decade of war, even as the war in Iraq has ended, and the war in Afghanistan is winding down. That’s why we’re not putting our troops in the middle of somebody else’s war.


But we are the United States of America. We cannot turn a blind eye to images like the ones we’ve seen out of Syria. Failing to respond to this outrageous attack would increase the risk that chemical weapons could be used again; that they would fall into the hands of terrorists who might use them against us, and it would send a horrible signal to other nations that there would be no consequences for their use of these weapons. All of which would pose a serious threat to our national security.


That’s why we can’t ignore chemical weapons attacks like this one – even if they happen halfway around the world. And that’s why I call on Members of Congress, from both parties, to come together and stand up for the kind of world we want to live in; the kind of world we want to leave our children and future generations.


Thank you.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Obama Weekly Address: Syria "A Serious Threat To Our National Security"

Friday, September 6, 2013

Obama to address the nation on Syria


President Barack Obama will address the American people on Syria from the White House on Tuesday in an effort to shift public opinion in favor of military action, he said Friday, while declining to rule out military action if he’s unable to get sufficient congressional support.


“In the coming days I’ll continue to consult with my fellow leaders around the world and continue to consult with Congress, and I will make the best case that I can to the American people, as well as to the international community, for taking necessary and appropriate action,” he said Friday during a press conference at the G-20 summit in St. Petersburg, Russia.





Obama: The world set a red line




Analysis from VandeHei, Allen




Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and other administration officials spent the week urging lawmakers to support the administration’s call for a strike against Bashar Assad’s regime, but are still struggling to build traction.


(PHOTOS: Obama, world leaders at G-20 summit)


Members of Congress and others have been urging Obama to make his case with a public address — an idea the White House initially shrugged off — but with public opinion and congressional views solidifying, some supporters of the administration’s policy said Tuesday’s speech may come too late.


As he and his aides have for days, Obama expressed confidence that he would able to get Congress to approve a resolution for a strike against Syria and wouldn’t say he’d take action if one or both chambers of Congress voted against it. “I think it would be a mistake for me to jump the gun and speculate,” he said, adding that he didn’t call on Congress for “symbolism.”


Asked twice to clarify his position, the president stayed evasive. “You’re not getting a direct response,” he said. Obama has kept his options open since calling Saturday for Congress to hold a vote on Syria, arguing that he has the authority to take military action without congressional approval, but that getting lawmakers’ support is best for the democracy.


(VIDEO: VandeHei, Allen analysis on Syria situation)


Obama acknowledged that he has staked out an unpopular position, but said it is his job to offer his judgment, and to try to persuade lawmakers and the American people. “I trust my constituents want me to offer my best judgment. That’s why they elected me. That’s why they re-elected me,” he said.


House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) welcomed Obama’s plans to address the nation on Syria, while voicing concern that Obama might have been better off delivering a speech earlier in the process.


“The speaker has consistently said the president has an obligation to make his case for intervention directly to the American people,” spokesman Brendan Buck said. “Members of Congress represent the views of their constituents, and only a president can convince the public that military action is required. We only hope this isn’t coming too late to make the difference.”


(Also on POLITICO: President Obama could lose big on Syria in House)


Obama discussed Syria with other world leaders at the G-20 on Thursday and Friday, and with Nordic leaders in Sweden earlier in the week, and said he was “encouraged” by the response he got. While some leaders expressed a desire to work through the United Nations, he said, the body has become a “barrier” to real action in Syria.


“I would greatly prefer working through multilateral channels and the united nations to get this done,” he said. “But ultimately, what I believe in even more deeply … requires that when there’s a breach this brazen of a norm this important and the international community is paralyzed and frozen and doesn’t act, then that norm begins to unravel. And if that norm unravels, then other norms and prohibitions start unraveling. And that makes for a more dangerous world.”


After Obama finished speaking, the White House released a joint statement from the United States and 10 other G-20 attendees blaming Assad for August’s chemical weapons attack and calling for the Syrian regime to be held accountable. “We support efforts undertaken by the United States and other countries to reinforce the prohibition on the use of chemical weapons,” said the statement, which was signed by Australia, Canada, France, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Turkey and the United Kingdom.


The statement took a tough stance against the UN Security Council — whose members include five of the statement’s signatories — arguing that the body “remains paralyzed as it has been for two and a half years” on Syria. “The world cannot wait for endless failed processes that can only lead to increased suffering in Syria and regional instability,” the statement read.


Russia has played a central role in blocking Security Council action, but Obama was cordial in describing that nation’s behavior at the summit, which was hosted by Russian President Vladimir Putin.


Obama commended Putin for “facilitating … a full airing of views” on Syria among leaders. Obama and Putin spent about 20 minutes meeting on the margins of the summit earlier Friday, and the president described it as “a candid and constructive conversation, which characterizes my relationship” with Putin.


Most of their conversation was about Syria and, on the issue, Obama said he told Putin: “I don’t expect us to agree on this issue of chemical weapons use, though it is possible after the UN inspectors’ report, it may become more difficult for Mr. Putin to maintain his position.”




POLITICO – TOP Stories



Obama to address the nation on Syria