Showing posts with label Bans. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bans. Show all posts

Thursday, March 27, 2014

Middleton, ID Unanimously Bans NDAA Indefinite Detention

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Middleton, ID Unanimously Bans NDAA Indefinite Detention

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

NY regulator says financial firms could face bans over money laundering




WASHINGTON Wed Mar 19, 2014 3:39pm EDT



State financial regulator Benjamin Lawsky listens to testimony at a hearing in New York January 29, 2014. REUTERS/Eric Thayer

State financial regulator Benjamin Lawsky listens to testimony at a hearing in New York January 29, 2014.


Credit: Reuters/Eric Thayer




WASHINGTON (Reuters) – New York state’s top financial regulator on Wednesday said his office, as part of efforts to crack down further on Wall Street misdeeds, is considering banning certain banks from specific businesses.


The New York Department of Financial Services has taken an increasingly hard line on financial institutions that have violated U.S. sanctions laws through their U.S. dollar clearing operations, imposing steep fines on them.


But the head of that office, Benjamin Lawsky, said in a speech in Washington he could envision moving beyond fines to penalties that could hurt the institutions in more severe ways.


“You could say no dollar clearing for a month or for a year or for six months,” Lawsky said, adding that he is still thinking through the potential repercussions of such steps.


Last year Lawsky’s office blocked Deloitte LLP’s financial advisory unit from working with New York state-regulated banks for a year as part of a settlement related to its review of money laundering controls at Standard Chartered Bank.


“We’re considering some new, similar ideas when it comes to our investigations into banks that used their dollar-clearing operations to launder money, but we have not come to any firm conclusions on that issue yet,” Lawsky said.


Lawsky, who has worked to establish a reputation as a tough enforcer, did not name firms and told reporters after his speech that his office is still thinking through how they could keep banks out of certain businesses.


U.S. regulators, including Lawsky’s office, are looking at whether French banks Credit Agricole and Societe Generale violated anti-money laundering rules and economic embargoes on countries like Iran, Reuters has reported.


Lawsky’s office has reached settlements with Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, which is owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc, and Standard Chartered over similar allegations.


Lawsky said regulators also need to go after more individuals as they figure out new ways to punish financial firms that break the rules.


“Ultimately, when Wall Street executives face real, serious consequences for breaking the rules – it helps deter future misconduct,” Lawsky said.


(Reporting by Emily Stephenson; Editing by Leslie Adler)





Reuters: Business News



NY regulator says financial firms could face bans over money laundering

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

EU agrees on travel bans and asset freezes for Russians in response to Ukraine crisis

By End the Lie


(Image credit: TijsB/Flickr)

(Image credit: TijsB/Flickr)



The European Union agreed on a framework for their first round of sanctions on Russia since the Cold War in response to the situation in Crimea, including bans on travel and asset freezes on certain people and firms.


Read our latest: “Sen. Feinstein accuses CIA of spying on Senate computers, McCain considers probe” and “Ukraine updates: Russia holds air defense drills, Ukraine to reject Crimea referendum


This comes after Secretary of State John Kerry indefinitely delayed a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russian forces continued to take control of bases in Crimea and Russia held air defense drills.


The EU move was stronger than many had expected, according to Reuters, and will target “an as-yet-undecided list of people and firms accused by Brussels of violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine.”


The sanctions will be imposed on Monday if diplomatic progress is not made, according to German Chancellor Angela Merkel.


The referendum that could make Crimea part of Russia will be held Sunday, even though the West continues to maintain that the vote is illegal.


While Washington has also announced a series of sanctions to be imposed on Russia, the measures imposed by the European Union would likely hit Russia harder.


Reuters points out that “Europe buys most of Russia’s oil and gas exports, while the United States is only a minor trade partner. The EU’s 335 billion euros of trade with Russia in 2012 was worth around 10 times that of the United States.”


Another Reuters article noted that the sanctions are being coordinated in concert with the U.S., Switzerland, Turkey, Japan and Canada.


This collaboration is part of “an effort to ensure the sanctions net is as tight and effective as possible.”


“Member states shall take the necessary measures to prevent the entry into, or transit through, their territories of the natural persons responsible for actions which undermine or threaten the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine,” Article 1 of the document states, according to Reuters.


The second article states “all funds and economic resources [in the EU] belonging to, owned, held or controlled” by those deemed responsible for undermining Ukrainian integrity “shall be frozen.”


The document was approved after none of the EU member states objected to the phrasing of the document, according to unnamed officials.


Foreign ministers of EU states will convene on Monday to formally sign off on the restrictions, unless Russia changes course significantly.


“When it comes to sanctions on Russia, a decision has in fact already been made, especially on the procedure of introducing sanctions,” Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said at a press conference, according to ITAR-TASS.


Officials reportedly stated that Putin and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov will not be on the sanctions list so that communications channels can remain open, according to Fox News.


Officials from the U.S., U.K., Italy, France, Germany, Switzerland and Japan met to discuss the issue in London on Tuesday, Fox News reports.


We would love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email us at contact@EndtheLie.com.


Please support alternative news and help us start paying contributors by donating, doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.




End the Lie – Independent News



EU agrees on travel bans and asset freezes for Russians in response to Ukraine crisis

Monday, February 3, 2014

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Monday, November 25, 2013

New Egypt Law Effectively Bans Street Protests


CAIRO — Egypt’s military-backed government has issued a law that all but bans street protests by applying jail time or heavy fines to the public demonstrations that have felled the last two presidents and regularly roiled the capital since the Arab Spring revolt.




The new law, promulgated on Sunday, is the latest evidence of a return to authoritarianism in the aftermath of the military takeover that removed President Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood in July. It criminalizes the kind of free assembly and public expression that many Egyptians had embraced as a cherished foundation of their new democracy after the 2011 ouster of President Hosni Mubarak. And the relatively muted outcry against the law, mainly from human rights advocates, demonstrated how far public sentiment has swung.


Rights activists said the new law appeared even stricter than those in place under Mr. Mubarak. It effectively replaces a three-month “state of emergency” declared in August, when the government used deadly force to crush street protests by Islamist opponents of the July 3 takeover, killing more than a thousand. The state of emergency — which suspended protections against police abuse — expired last weekend, but the new protest law now grants the police other added powers that they could use to squelch any attempt to mobilize.


Hazem El-Beblawi, the prime minister, said in a television interview that the law did not ban protests but merely regulated them.


“The starting point for this law is that the right to protest is a human right and must be given full care and attention,” he said. “It is just that practicing this right must be met with a sense of responsibility so it won’t damage security or terrorize or assault establishments.”


Asked about those who failed to seek permission for their protests — like the Islamists who consider the current government illegal — Mr. Beblawi said: “Like a man who kills or another who deals in drugs, all those commit violations, and as soon as they commit such violations, if arrested, they will be put to trial and punished.”


The new law effectively bans any public gathering of more than 10 people without government approval. It requires notification of the authorities three days in advance. It specifically bans all demonstrations at places of worship. Organizers across the political spectrum have customarily used Friday Prayer at mosques — the main community meeting place — as the starting points for marches and protests.


The law also gives security agencies like the secret police the right to prohibit any public gatherings, demonstrations or meetings — including political campaign events — if deemed a threat to public order. Citizens have the right to appeal to a court, but there is no deadline for a ruling. In Egypt such a decision could easily take months, until after an issue or election has passed.


The law requires that police officers dispersing any public gathering must escalate their use of force gradually, beginning with verbal warnings, followed by nonlethal measures like water cannons, tear gas and clubs, and ultimately including birdshot. If protesters resist, the police must use only proportionate force.


The Egyptian police, however, lack training or a track record in such gradual, proportionate use of force. And the Interior Ministry often interprets those terms differently than most human rights groups, for example, applying them to the siege of two Islamist sit-ins here this summer. Security forces killed nearly 1,000 protesters, according to an estimate by Prime Minister Beblawi, and the vast majority of the dead were unarmed.


Among other penalties, the law imposes a seven-year imprisonment for the use of violence in a protest, one year for covering the face during a protest, and one year for protesting outside a mosque or place of worship. Anyone attending an unauthorized demonstration can be fined $ 1,500, a sum equal to months of pay for many Egyptians.


Activists with the April 6 group, which helped to start the revolt against Mr. Mubarak, said they had applied on Monday for permission to hold a protest against the new law, a first test of its application.




Mayy El Sheikh contributed reporting.





NYT > International Home



New Egypt Law Effectively Bans Street Protests

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

EPA Bans Most Wood-Burning Stoves

EPA Bans Most Wood-Burning Stoves
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/8e554__gun_ban__182.jpg?resize=1502C150


Share this article

1


Wood-burning stoves offer warmth and enhance off-grid living options during cold weather months, but the tried-and-true heating devices now are under attack by the Environmental Protection Agency.


The EPA has banned the production and sale of the types of stoves used by about 80 percent of those with such stoves. The regulations limit the amount of “airborne fine-particle matter” to 12 micrograms per cubic meter of air. The current EPA regulations allow for 15 micrograms in the same amount of air space.


Most of the wood stoves currently nestled inside cabins and homes from coast-to-coast don’t meet the new environmental standard. The EPA launched a “Burn Wise” website to help convince the public that the new regulations were needed.


Trading in an old stove for a newer stove isn’t allowed.


“Replacing an older stove with a cleaner-burning stove will not improve air quality if the older stove is reused somewhere else,” the website says. “For this reason, wood stove change out programs usually require older stoves to be destroyed and recycled as scrap metal, or rendered inoperable.”


In some areas of the country, local governments have gone further than the EPA and banned not just the sale of such stoves, but the usage of old stoves – and even the usage of fireplaces. That means that even if you still have a stove or a fireplace, you can’t burn it for fear of a fine. Puget Sound, Washington, is one such location.


The Most Versatile Backup Stove In The World Allows You To Cook Anything, Any Time, Any Where


Burn Wise is a partnership program associated with the EPA that is tasked with emphasizing the “importance of burning the right wood, the right way, in the right stove.” Information shared on the website operated by the federal government also states that both state and local agencies are pursuing ways to improve air quality that relate to wood-burning stoves.


liberty2


The overall goal of the EPA Burn Wise program is to educate both local governmental agencies and citizens about the need for more “cleaner-burning” in the marketplace. Three of the most recent highlighted articles and webinars on the EPA Burn Wise website include details about a voluntary wood burning fireplace program, strategies for reducing residential wood some in state, tribal, and local communities, and a recording entitled, “Reducing Residential Wood Some: Is it Worth it?”


The EPA also has compiled a list of “approved” stoves.


According to a Washington Times review of the wood stove ban, the most dangerous aspect of the EPA proposed guidelines is the one-size-fits-all approach to the perceived problem. The same wood burning stove rules would apply to both heavily air-pollution laden major cities and far cleaner rural regions with extremely cooler temperatures. Families living in Alaska, or off the grid in wilderness area in the West, will most likely have extreme difficulty remaining in their cold, secluded homes if the EPA wood stove rules are approved.


The Times further said that wood burning stoves put less airborne fine-particle manner in the air than is present from secondhand some in a closed vehicle. When an individual smokes inside a car with the windows up, passengers are reportedly exposed to approximately 4,000 micrograms of soot per cubic meter.


Wrote the Times’ editorial board:


“Alaska’s 663,000 square miles is mostly forested, offering residents an abundant source of affordable firewood. When county officials floated a plan to regulate the burning of wood, residents were understandably inflamed. ‘Everybody wants clean air. We just have to make sure that we can also heat our homes,’ state Rep. Tammie Wilson told the Associated Press. Rather than fret over EPA’s computer-model-based warning about the dangers of inhaling soot from wood smoke, residents have more pressing concerns on their minds such as the immediate risk of freezing when the mercury plunges.”


Do you support the EPA’s wood stove ban?


bp


Written by: Tara Dodrill, Source


Share this article




WHAT REALLY HAPPENED




Read more about EPA Bans Most Wood-Burning Stoves and other interesting subjects concerning Police State at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

UK watchdog bans govt ‘Go home’ ads targeting immigrants



Published time: October 09, 2013 15:54

Sceenshot from YouTube video

Sceenshot from YouTube video




A UK advertising watchdog has banned a controversial Home Office advert suggesting that illegal immigrants in the UK to ‘Go home or face arrest,’ saying that it was misleading. However, the ad was not ruled to be ‘offensive’ or ‘distressing.’


The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) absolved the government campaign of either attribute, despite the widespread belief that it was offensive forming the basis for the majority of the 224 complaints filed against it. The vans bearing the controversial slogan were driven around six London boroughs with large immigrant populations as part of a Home Office pilot scheme in July.


The ASA took issue merely with “inaccurate statistics” on the vans, but complainants deemed the ads to be “racist.” Out of the five categories of complaint made, a mere two general points were upheld, the first being that the writing on the ads was not legible, and the second being that the ad was not substantiated and misleading.


After instructing illegal immigrants to “go home,” the ads cited a statistic that there had been “106 arrests last week in your area” across the six boroughs.  


The ASA said that the figure “related to arrests made throughout a significant part of London north of the Thames,” and not necessarily relate to the specific areas where people would have seen the vans.


Additionally, the arrests had been made more than two weeks prior to the vans being sent out, not in the last week, and the ASA ruled that a breach had been committed under “misleading advertising” and “substantiation.” “We…noted the posters were displayed during the week of 22 to 28 July,” said the ASA, conceding that the data provided in support of the “106 arrests” statistic in fact “related to the week 30 June to 6 July.”


However, the watchdog conceded that that “most” of the complaints had challenged whether “the poster, and in particular the phrase ‘Go home’, was offensive,” because it was considered to be “reminiscent of slogans used by racist groups to attack immigrants in the past.”


The slogan has echoes of the Neo-Nazi National Front rhetoric in the 1970s, with ASA chief executive Guy Parker telling BBC Radio 4′s Today Programme that it “clearly carries baggage.” However, he added that the campaign was unlikely to cause “widespread offence.”


Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told the Labour Party Conference two weeks ago that: “Those ad vans were driving past the offices and homes of families whose parents and grandparents had to endure those same slogans scrawled high in graffiti 40 years ago.”


The ASA highlighted that complaints had been made accusing the campaign of having the potential to exacerbate racial tensions, particularly within multicultural communities. Britain’s business secretary, Vince Cable, himself termed the campaign ‘stupid and offensive’. However, the ASA did not uphold the criticisms.

“We concluded that the poster was unlikely to incite or exacerbate racial hatred and tensions in multi-cultural communities,”
it said.


The Home Office responded, stating the advert would not appear again in its previous incarnation and welcoming their dismissal of complaints calling it ‘offensive’. “We are pleased the ASA has concluded that our pilot was neither offensive nor irresponsible,” said a Home Office spokesperson.


“This campaign was about encouraging illegal immigrants to leave the country voluntarily and was not targeted at particular racial or ethnic groups.”


This means that the UK’s government still remains at liberty to direct the ‘Go Home’ slogan at UK illegal immigrants, providing statistics are both relevant and accurate, and the writing is of a legible size – the second complaint which was upheld was made by a ‘few’ people who found the most questionable feature of the vans to be the fact that the smaller print was illegible on a moving vehicle.  


“We considered… that small print should be clearly visible to a normally sighted person reading the marketing communication once from a reasonable distance and at a reasonable speed,” said the ASA in its ruling.


“The ad must not appear again in its current form,” the ASA report concluded.




RT – News



UK watchdog bans govt ‘Go home’ ads targeting immigrants

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Egypt Junta Bans Muslim Brotherhood



Egypt Junta Bans Muslim Brotherhood


Court Decision to Accelerate Crackdown Against Elected Govt


by Jason Ditz, September 23, 2013




Egypt’s military junta has a new excuse to crack down violently against the elected government today, after a Cairo court ordered the complete ban of the Muslim Brotherhood, which ran the largest and most successful political party during Egypt’s brief democratic experiment.


The verdict authorizes the military, which seized power over the summer in a violent coup d’etat against President Mohammed Morsi, to confiscate all assets of the Brotherhood, which includes large numbers of schools, hospitals and charity organizations across Egypt.


The ban came as a result of legal challenges filed by pro-junta “liberal” political factions, which argue that the Brotherhood’s organization of anti-junta protests amounts to “terrorism.”


The banning eliminates a successful, influential political party from the field if indeed Egypt holds future elections, but it remains to be seen how much credibility the so-called liberal factions will retain after endorsing the junta’s crackdowns.


From the junta’s perspective, it also eliminates the only real challengers to their continued rule, as the feckless political opposition that remains have shown little ability to mobilize anybody when they aren’t being bankrolled by the US to provide a pretext for a coup.


Exactly what this means for the Muslim Brotherhood itself remains to be seen, however, as the group has been banned off and on throughout its history, and has always managed to survive.


Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz






News From Antiwar.com



Egypt Junta Bans Muslim Brotherhood

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

LEWIS STILL MARCHING ON WASHINGTON – Booker wins big – Will Labrador announce run for guv? – Jacksons" sentencing today – HOOTERS BANS FILNER – Tweets can predict elections – trivia


50 YEARS LATER, LEWIS STILL MARCHING ON WASHINGTON – Sheryl Gay Stolberg reports for the New York Times:” John Lewis was the 23-year-old son of Alabama sharecroppers and already a veteran of the civil rights movement when he came to the capital 50 years ago this month to deliver a fiery call for justice on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. Mr. Lewis’s urgent cry — ‘We want our freedom, and we want it now!’ — was eclipsed on the steps that day by the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s ‘I Have A Dream’ speech. But two years later, after Alabama State Police officers beat him and fractured his skull while he led a march in Selma, he was back in Washington to witness President Lyndon B. Johnson sign the Voting Rights Act of 1965.


– “Today Mr. Lewis is a congressman from Georgia and the sole surviving speaker from the March on Washington in August 1963. His history makes him the closest thing to a moral voice in the divided Congress. At 73, he is still battling a half-century later. With the Voting Rights Act in jeopardy now that the Supreme Court has invalidated one of its central provisions, Mr. Lewis, a Democrat, is fighting an uphill battle to reauthorize it. He is using his stature as a civil rights icon to prod colleagues like the Republican leader, Representative Eric Cantor of Virginia, to get on board. He has also met with the mother of Trayvon Martin and compared his shooting to the 1955 murder of 14-year-old Emmett Till.


– “Mr. Lewis has an answer for those who say the election of a black president was a fulfillment of Dr. King’s dream: It was only ‘a down payment,’ he said in an interview.” http://nyti.ms/19g61g4


BOOKER CRUISES TO VICTORY IN N.J. SENATE PRIMARY – Matt Friedman and David Giambusso have the story for The (Newark) Star-Ledger: “For two months, polls showed Democratic Newark Mayor Cory Booker and conservative Republican activist Steve Lonegan with seemingly unbeatable leads in their party’s primaries for U.S. Senate. They were right. Booker and Lonegan romped to victory tonight after brief campaigns in which they virtually ignored their opponents. The rare August election took place on a rainy day, during which a small fraction of those eligible turned up to cast their votes. ‘There are those and others who deride the vision that brought us all here together. They dismiss the idea that we can come together,’ Booker told supporters outside the Prudential Center in Newark. ‘They said that I — they say that we — are being naïve. To them I say, have you ever met us? … This is Newark, New Jersey, and we don’t do naïve.’


– “The results set up a battle between the celebrity Newark mayor and the strong-willed former Bogota mayor — whose outsized personalities inspired documentary movies about them — in a special Oct. 16 general election to succeed the late Democratic U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg.” http://bit.ly/14KjGuD Watch Booker’s speech here: http://bit.ly/13Yjs3l


WILL LABRADOR ANNOUNCE RUN FOR GOVERNOR TODAY? – Robert Ehlert reports for the Idaho Statesman: “Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, said this afternoon he will announce his future political plans during a press conference Wednesday though he gave no indication of the exact time or location. The two-term congressman from Idaho’s First District made the announcement during an Idaho Statesman Editorial Board meeting after he was asked if he would be running for Governor of Idaho. There has been speculation for months that Labrador would be among the challengers to unseat Gov. Butch Otter, who has announced his intention to run for re-election in 2014. Labrador entertained questions from the Editorial Board for nearly 90 minutes but declined to provide clues about what his political decision would be. He appeared at the meeting and introduced several new staff members — hired in the past few months — a sign, perhaps, that he was shoring up his official staff so he could begin paying more attention to something else.” http://bit.ly/13TRnu2


RUBIO’S NEW IMMIGRATION PITCH – Anna Palmer and Burgess Everett report for the hometown paper: “Marco Rubio’s back in the ring on immigration reform and he’s got a new move: Congress needs to fix the problem — or Barack Obama will. The line is meant to touch a nerve with conservatives who might dislike the idea of immigration reform, but loathe the idea of Obama taking on any major issue on his own — let alone immigration. Rubio’s goal is to re-ignite momentum behind a reform package that fizzled this summer in the House, where most Republicans have balked at the idea of a path to citizenship for millions of undocumented workers. The fierce House ‘no’ caucus argues its base doesn’t want immigration reform and passing it would just hand Obama a gift — and the Democratic Party millions of new voters. But if Rubio has a shot at building the urgency needed to convert enough Republicans to pass a comprehensive bill, the end of the August recess could be his best bet, since it’s a time when the news cycle is slow and lawmakers can be pressured before heading back to Washington in September.” http://politi.co/13XoblV


BLOODSHED IN EGYPT – The Wall Street Journal’s Maria Abi-Habib and Leila Elmergawi report from Cairo: “Egyptian troops staged a crackdown on protesters that turned deadly Wednesday morning in efforts to clear two antigovernment sit-ins in Cairo, a development that observers worry could plunge the already divided country further into uncontrollable violence. Ten civilians died and 98 were injured as two squares in the capital were stormed, according to Mohammed Soltan, head of the ambulance authority at the Ministry of Health. The Freedom and Justice Party, the political arm of the Muslim Brotherhood, said the field hospitals the Brotherhood has set up in the two squares have recorded more than 300 deaths. The Egyptian Interior ministry said one police officer died and nine were injured by gunshots that were fired to disperse the sit-ins.” http://on.wsj.com/1a3xog2


McCONNELL: GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN WON’T STOP OBAMACARE – Tanner Hesterberg reports for WYMT-TV in Corbin, Ky.: “A government shutdown would not prevent the Affordable Care Act from being funded, Kentucky’s senior senator said Tuesday. Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has refused to publicly take a side as some members of his party lobby for shutting down the federal government. ‘The problem is the bill that would shut down the government wouldn’t shut down Obamacare,’ McConnell said. ‘Most of it is permanent law and not affected by that. It also wouldn’t stop the taxes. Taxes that are going in on medical devices, taxes that are going in on health insurance premiums.’ McConnell, who is also the GOP leader in the Senate, spoke to a group of healthcare workers Tuesday at Baptist Health Corbin, a hospital in southern Kentucky. During the meeting, McConnell told audience members, ‘I’m for stopping Obamacare, but shutting down the government will not stop Obamacare.’” http://bit.ly/1cAN24t


– But WaPo blogger Greg Sargent argues that McConnell actually isn’t taking sides in the shutdown debate happening in the GOP: http://wapo.st/19goysp


WHY MADISON PROJECT ENDORSED BEVIN OVER McCONNELL – In a USA Today op-ed, former GOP Rep. Jim Ryun explains why his PAC is backing insurgent Republicans Matt Bevin and Art Halvorson over incumbents Mitch McConnell and Bill Shuster: “If we want to win legislative battles, we have to win electoral wars first. Many of those start in primaries against establishment Republicans who have either become complicit in the endless expansion of the federal government or feckless in stopping its aggressive champions. Over the past year, my political action committee, The Madison Project has had the opportunity to help recruit a number of conservatives who understand the gravity of our public policy problems and are willing to fight for solutions that will fundamentally restore our constitutional republic. They are committed to promoting a new standard in Washington – one in which principled leaders actually fight and win battles for conservatives. They will do whatever it takes to shrink the size of government – including filibusters against harmful legislation in the Senate or voting against rules to consider bad legislation backed by GOP leadership in the House.” http://usat.ly/1cxoARx


JACKSONS TO PUSH FOR LIGHTER SENTENCE TODAY – Natasha Korecki and Lynn Sweet report for the Chicago Sun-Times: “Mental health issues are expected to take center stage at Jesse Jackson Jr.’s Wednesday’s sentencing hearing as his lawyers will ask a judge for leniency because the former congressman suffers from bipolar disorder. Portions of court filings made public on Tuesday reveal U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson (no relation) has already reviewed multiple documents involving Jackson’s health issues as well as difficulties the family has faced in recent years. Attorneys for the Jacksons had asked that some of the documents not be made public. But prosecutors argued that the public’s right to know only increases if the Jacksons are to make health reasons a central factor to ask for a break in sentencing.” http://bit.ly/1btzEva


KLOBUCHAR REACTS TO DOJ CHALLENGE TO AIRLINES MERGER – Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who sits on both the Judiciary and Commerce, Transportation and Science committees, sent along this statement: “Whether it’s a family looking for affordable flights or a small business-owner looking for the best frequent flier program, we need to make sure consumers have as many choices as possible at the lowest prices and that no airline or small group of airlines has a stranglehold on the market. As chair of the Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee I held a hearing to examine this merger’s potential impact on fares, fees, jobs, service and safety. At the hearing there were serious issues raised about the effect of the merger on prices in particular markets, and the Justice Department’s complaint reflects those concerns.”


**A message from POWERJobs: New jobs on our radar this week: Deputy Head of U.S.  Government Relations at Visa, Public Policy Specialist at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, and Associate Director, Federal Relations at The Joint Commission. Interested? Apply to these jobs and more atPOWERJobs.com; finally, a career site made for YOU!**


GOOD WEDNESDAY MORNING, August 14, 2013, and welcome to The Huddle, your play-by-play preview of the day’s congressional news. Send tips, suggestions, comments, complaints and corrections to swong@politico.com. If you don’t already, please follow me on Twitter @scottwongDC.


My new followers include @IPCPR_KipTalley and @swagodio.


TODAY IN CONGRESS – Both the House and Senate have adjourned for the summer recess.


SAN DIEGO HOOTERS BAN FILNER – Matt Smith and Kyung Lah report for CNN: “How bad has it gotten for embattled San Diego Mayor Bob Filner?  Even Hooters — the restaurant chain sometimes criticized for its scantily clad waitresses — says he’s no longer welcome.  The chain’s downtown location has joined a campaign by a local radio talk-show host, who’s urging businesses to post signs in their window that declare Filner persona non grata. The signs note that the mayor “will not be served in this establishment” and ‘We believe women should be treated with respect.’ In a statement posted on Twitter, the company said restaurant acted on its own. ‘Our Hooters Girls in San Diego have spoken. Not a corporate gig, but we support our girls,’ it read.” http://bit.ly/15BReax See the sign: http://bit.ly/17ncYtn


N.Y. MAYORAL DEBATE MOVES PAST WEINER – Maggie Haberman reports for POLITICO: The Anthony Weiner Show hit prime time Tuesday night. The lather-rinse-repeat act of asking the former congressman and current New York City Democratic mayoral hopeful about his sexting scandal and his regrets took place on a stage and over broadcast TV with his four rivals in the first televised debate of the primary campaign. But for the first time, Weiner, currently polling in fourth place in the latest public survey in the race, didn’t suck up all the oxygen in the room. In fact, three of Weiner’s rivals seemed content to ignore him and the scandal that has dominated headlines for weeks. Only City Council Speaker Christine Quinn engaged Weiner repeatedly, invoking his scandal to say he has no standing to lecture his opponents. But for the most part, the first debate in a campaign that’s been characterized by the salacious was largely a snooze. Save for Weiner revealing during a lightning round at the end that “after midnight” he plays ice hockey, there was very little new ground covered for the former Queens congressman.” http://politi.co/16JDVYg


– A Hillary Clinton spokesman said he had no idea what Weiner was talking about when he said he knew what role his wife, Huma Abedin, would play in a Clinton 2016 presidential run. Weiner says his comments were all a joke. http://politi.co/16JGwRX


STUDY: TWEETS CAN PREDICT ELECTIONS – Alex Roarty writes for National Journal: “Who needs polls? A study published Monday reports that campaigns could use Twitter to successfully predict the winner of most races, findings that might bolster the social media service’s already robust political presence. The key measure, researchers from Indiana University found, was a candidate’s ‘tweet share,’ the percentage of total tweets about a race that mention them. The more often a candidate is mentioned on Twitter relative to their opponent, the study reported, the greater their chance for victory. The findings were comprehensive: An analysis of tweets from the 2010 midterm elections found the data correctly predicted the winner in 404 of the 406 House races. ‘We plotted it and thought, ‘Holy moly, it was a very strong correlation,’ ‘ said Fabio Rojas, a sociology professor at Indiana and one of the study’s coauthors. He added that preliminary analysis of last year’s congressional elections show similar results.” http://bit.ly/16MUkx1


GOP WANTS SOME OF LERNER’S PERSONAL EMAILS – Josh Hicks reports for WaPo: “House Republicans opened a new front Tuesday in their examination of the IRS targeting issue, demanding all work-related e-mails from the personal account of agency official Lois Lerner. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) requested the communications in a letter to Lerner, who was placed on administrative leave in May after an inspector general’s report revealed that the agency had screened groups for extra scrutiny based on their political ideology. The congressman said investigators had discovered that Lerner sent documents relating to her official duties to a personal e-mail account labeled ‘Lois Home.’ ‘This raises some serious questions concerning your use of a non-official e-mail account to conduct official business,’ the letter said.” http://wapo.st/1a3TEXk


YUCCA DECISION DEALS SMALL SETBACK FOR REID –  Niels Lesniewski reports for Roll Call: “The District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion Tuesday that’s a bit of a setback to Majority Leader Harry Reid’s ongoing efforts to ensure that Yucca Mountain never becomes a nuclear waste repository. The opinion noted, however, that Congress could very well continue to use the power of the purse to deny funding for the project in the Democratic senator’s home state of Nevada. Reid has long used his clout as majority leader to ensure that federal money isn’t appropriated for the project. In a split decision, a three judge panel of the Court of Appeals held that the law requires that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission comply with a law requiring the agency to consider a permit application for storage of nuclear waste at the site.” http://bit.ly/16NDmi6


TUESDAY’S TRIVIA WINNERTom Flanagin was first to correctly answer that in the film “Advise and Consent,” Henry Fonda played a Secretary of State nominee whose nomination was tainted because of his alleged past history with communism.


TODAY’S TRIVIA – Rachel Gorlin has a follow-up question: Which star of a 1980s Emmy-award winning sitcom plays a U.S. senator from Kansas in Otto Preminger’s 1962 film “Advise and Consent”?  The first person to correctly answer gets a mention in the next day’s Huddle. Email me at swong@politico.com.


GET HUDDLE emailed to your Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device each morning. Just enter your email address where it says “Sign Up.” http://www.politico.com/huddle/


**A message from POWERJobs: Tap into the power of POWERJOBS for the newest job opportunities in the Washington area from the area’s top employers, including Visa, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld and The Joint Commission. Powered by names you trust – POLITICO, WTOP, WJLA/ABC-TV, NewsChannel 8 and Federal News Radio- POWERJOBS is the ultimate career site with more than2 million job searches and nearly 17,000 applications submitted this year so far. Connect through Facebook or LinkedIn, search jobs by industry and set up job-specific email alerts using POWERJobs.com, the site for Washington’s top talent.**




POLITICO – Top 10 – Huddle



LEWIS STILL MARCHING ON WASHINGTON – Booker wins big – Will Labrador announce run for guv? – Jacksons" sentencing today – HOOTERS BANS FILNER – Tweets can predict elections – trivia

Sunday, August 4, 2013

China bans New Zealand milk powder imports on botulism scare: NZ trade min




WELLINGTON | Sun Aug 4, 2013 12:11am EDT



WELLINGTON (Reuters) – China has halted imports of all New Zealand milk powder, New Zealand’s trade minister said on Sunday, after bacteria that can cause botulism found in some dairy products raised food safety concerns that threatened its $ 9.4 billion annual dairy trade.


Global dairy trade giant Fonterra said on Saturday it had sold contaminated New Zealand-made whey protein concentrate to eight customers in Australia, China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand and Saudi Arabia for use in a range of products, including infant milk powder.


Nearly 90 percent of China’s $ 1.9 billion in milk powder imports last year originated in New Zealand, so a prolonged ban could result in a shortage of dairy products in China.


Foreign-branded infant formula in particular is a prized commodity in China given consumer distrust of Chinese brands after a series of domestic food safety scandals.


New Zealand’s neighbor Australia was caught up in the ban after some of the contaminated whey protein concentrate was exported there before being sent on to China and elsewhere.


“The authorities in China, in my opinion absolutely appropriately, have stopped all imports of New Zealand milk powders from Australia and New Zealand,” New Zealand Trade Minister Tim Groser told Television New Zealand on Sunday.


“It’s better to do blanket protection for your people and then wind it back when we, our authorities, are in a position to give them the confidence and advice that they need before doing that,” he said.


There was no official word of a ban from Chinese authorities early on Sunday.


On Saturday, Chinese state radio said Fonterra was notifying three Chinese firms affected by the contamination. Some of China’s biggest food and beverage companies are said to be customers of Fonterra, using its milk powder as an ingredient in everything from confectionery to cheese on frozen pizza.


Fonterra is a major supplier of bulk milk powder products used in formula in China but it had stayed out of branding after Chinese dairy company Sanlu, in which it had held a large stake, was found to have added melamine – often used in plastics – to bulk up formulas in 2008. More than six children died in the industry-wide scandal and hundreds were made sick.


BANS, RECALLS


Other countries also were reportedly halting imports and ordering recalls of New Zealand-made dairy products.


Russia has suspended imports and circulation of Fonterra products, Russia’s ITAR-TASS news agency said on Saturday, quoting consumer watchdog Rospotrebnadzor.


Media reports late on Saturday said Thailand had ordered a recall of Fonterra products imported since May.


New Zealand’s Ministry of Primary Industries said five batches of follow-on baby formula marketed by Karicare, a popular brand in China, had been contaminated by the bacteria, although none had entered the retail supply chain.


Those products sitting in storage facilities would be held back from the market, it said.


Farmer-owned Fonterra is a big supplier of wholesale dairy ingredients to multinational food and beverage companies. It also markets its own consumer brands, including Anchor milk in New Zealand and Anlene and Anmum maternal milk formula, which is available in Southeast Asia and other regions.


It said all of its own brands were free of contamination and that there had been no reports of any illness linked to the affected whey protein. It added that Fonterra CEO Theo Spierings was travelling to China to discuss the issue.


The incident is the second this year involving New Zealand’s largest company. In January, Fonterra said it had found traces of dicyandiamde, a potentially toxic chemical used in fertilizer, in some of its products.


The bacteria behind the latest scare, Clostridium Botulinum, is often found in soil. The Fonterra case was caused by a dirty pipe at a processing plant.


It can cause botulism, a potentially fatal disease that affects the muscles and can cause respiratory problems. Infant botulism can attack the intestinal system.


The contamination issue comes as China has started to tighten dairy import regulations to improve overall food safety. In recent weeks, Beijing has introduced regulations restricting the operations of smaller infant formula brands.


New Zealand’s dairy industry is a big driver of the country’s agriculture-based economy, with its NZ$ 12 billion in exports last year accounting for around 25 percent of total merchandise exports. ($ 1 = 1.2767 New Zealand dollars)


(Additional reporting by Lincoln Feast in Sydney; Editing by Paul Tait)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



China bans New Zealand milk powder imports on botulism scare: NZ trade min

China bans NZ dairy imports in scare


A family looks at foreign imported milk powder products at a supermarket in Beijing July 3, 2013.Foreign brands of baby milk formula are hugely sought after


China has banned all imports of milk powder from New Zealand, after its main dairy exporter, Fonterra, found in some of its products a strain of bacteria that can cause botulism.


China relies on New Zealand for almost all its imports of milk powder.


Imports are highly prized in China after a tainted milk formula scandal in 2008 killed six babies and made some 300,000 infants sick.


New Zealand’s trade minister described Beijing’s decision as “appropriate”.


Fonterra’s announcement that it had found the contamination led to a global recall of up to 1,000 tonnes of dairy products across seven countries, including China.


The potentially tainted products included infant milk formula, sports drinks, protein drinks and other beverages.


Botulism is one of the most dangerous forms of food poisoning, often leading to paralysis.


The bacteria was found in three batches of Fonterra’s whey protein used in infants’ Nutricia Karicare follow-on formula, Fonterra said.


Nearly 80% of dairy products imported by China come from New Zealand, according to state media.


Any prolonged ban of imports could well lead to a diary shortage in China, the BBC’s Martin Patience reports from Beijing.


‘Blanket protection’

New Zealand Trade Minister Tim Groser said China’s action was “entirely appropriate”.


“It’s better to do blanket protection for your people then wind it back when we, our authorities, are in a position to give them the confidence and advice that they need.”


The Chinese authorities named four domestic companies that have imported potentially contaminated products from New Zealand. According to state media, these companies have begun a recall.


The whey product was produced in May 2012, with a dirty pipe at one of Fonterra’s processing plants in Waikato responsible for the contamination, the company said.


Fonterra – the fourth largest diary company in the world – said it had urged its customers to urgently check their supply chains.


The countries affected besides New Zealand and China include Australia, Thailand, Malaysia, Vietnam and Saudi Arabia.


Russia is also reported to have begun a recall of Fonterra products.


Fonterra said there had been no reports of any illness linked to the affected whey product.


The dairy industry powers New Zealand’s economy, with the country exporting up to 95% of its milk.




BBC News – Asia



China bans NZ dairy imports in scare

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Union says drug bans likely not served this year








New York Yankees’ Alex Rodriguez reaches for a ground ball during warm ups for a Class AA baseball game with the Trenton Thunder against the Reading Phillies, Monday, July 15, 2013, in Reading, Pa. Rodriguez is doing a rehab assignment with the Thunder recuperating from hip surgery. (AP Photo/Reading Eagle, Jeremy Drey)





New York Yankees’ Alex Rodriguez reaches for a ground ball during warm ups for a Class AA baseball game with the Trenton Thunder against the Reading Phillies, Monday, July 15, 2013, in Reading, Pa. Rodriguez is doing a rehab assignment with the Thunder recuperating from hip surgery. (AP Photo/Reading Eagle, Jeremy Drey)





Milwaukee Brewers’ Ryan Braun is seen in the dugout during the first inning of a baseball game against the Cincinnati Reds Wednesday, July 10, 2013, in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Morry Gash)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — The baseball players’ association says any suspensions resulting from the sport’s latest drug investigation likely won’t be served until next year if the discipline is challenged before an arbitrator.


Union head Michael Weiner expects Major League Baseball will notify the union of its plans for penalties in the next month, and the association will maintain any discipline should not be announced until after a grievance hearing, and then only if arbitrator Fredric Horowitz upholds a ban.


“We’re going to have a discussion with them. That discussion will include whether or not names of suspended players will be announced publicly,” Weiner said Tuesday during a meeting with the Baseball Writers’ Association of America.


Former MVPs Alex Rodriguez and Ryan Braun are among the more than a dozen players under investigation for ties to Biogenesis, a closed anti-aging clinic in Florida linked with the distribution of performance-enhancing drugs. MLB officials have been interviewing players, who have been represented by the union and their own lawyers.


A provision in baseball’s drug agreement says discipline for first offenders can be announced before a hearing if the penalty results from an allegation that became public other than through MLB or a team. Miami New Times published allegations in January, but the union could argue that a penalty results from evidence baseball has gathered rather than the newspaper account.


After MLB and the union decide how to process grievances, hearings will be scheduled before Horowitz — but not before September and possibly later. Each player is entitled to a separate hearing, and Weiner said the union wants Horowitz to hear all cases.


“When all the interviews are done, we will meet with the commissioner’s office and we’ll try to work something out,” Weiner said. “Our players that deserve the suspensions, we’ll try to we’ll try to come up with a fair suspension. Our players that don’t deserve suspensions, we will argue that they don’t deserve a suspension. And I hope we have success. We may not have success on every single player, but I hope we have a fair amount of success.”


MLB Executive Vice President Rob Manfred declined comment.


Weiner spoke from a wheelchair and said symptoms have increased in the last month from a brain tumor he was diagnosed with last summer. He currently can’t move his right side or right arm and must use a wheelchair.


Weiner said the union will appoint a deputy executive director within a week or two.


Most of his talk was dominated by the drug investigation.


While most suspensions have been for positive tests since the joint drug agreement was reached in 2002, players also can be penalized for “just cause,” based on other evidence.


“In theory, they could be suspended for five games or 500 games,” Weiner said. “We could then choose to challenge or not, but the commissioner’s office is not bound by the 50-100-life scale.”


If multiple players are disciplined, management and the union would have to decide the order of the grievance hearings.


“They’ve got to prove all those cases. I like Dan Halem, a lot, but he’s going to be running around like the proverbial chicken with its head cut off,” Weiner said, referring to an MLB senior vice president. “If that’s the circumstance, we’ll just have to schedule them and get them done as quickly as we reasonably can. And if we have the number that you suggest, it’s going to take a while.”


Weiner said the union has taken the position that players can’t be penalized for refusing to answer MLB’s questions in the investigation. Arbitrator Raymond Goetz overturned Bowie Kuhn’s suspension of Ferguson Jenkins in 1980, ruling the pitcher couldn’t be penalized for refusing to answer questions while criminal charges were pending in Canada.


“Obviously we have looked at Jenkins in connection with this matter and whether or not it would apply, and our conclusion is that it clearly does,” Weiner said.


Speaking before Weiner in a separate session, baseball Commissioner Bud Selig repeated his call to toughen penalties in the drug agreement for 2014.


“We’ve heard from a lot of players that increased penalties are called for. We’ve heard from a lot of other players that don’t think increased penalties are called for,” Weiner said. “And I imagine we will work it out at or near in early December and then have a negotiation with them over that very subject.”


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Union says drug bans likely not served this year

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Britain Bans PrisonPlanet.com And InfoWars.com (Alex Jones Contest)



This is a wake up call to inform everyone what realy is going on.
Video Rating: 4 / 5




David Icke -- Prison Planet Interview Part 3

“Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, …



Britain Bans PrisonPlanet.com And InfoWars.com (Alex Jones Contest)

Sunday, April 7, 2013

Egypt bans YouTube as "Brotherhood tries to restore autocratic rule"




Egypt bans YouTube as

Thousands of people, armed with stones and petrol bombs, have been unleashing their anger against Islamist President Mohammed Morsi. The political turmoil ha…



Egypt bans YouTube as "Brotherhood tries to restore autocratic rule"