Showing posts with label milk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label milk. Show all posts

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Most of What You Think You Know About Milk Is Probably Dairy Industry Lies



The powerful dairy lobby has been spreading dangerous health claims about milk for decades.








Got milk allergy? Many people including Native Americans and people of Asian, African and South American descent are lactose intolerant and can’t and don"t drink milk. That is the way nature made them over epochs and no one ever died of a dairy deficiency.



But there is money in dairy. That is why American fast food companies try to bring the love of dairy to cultures where it traditionally hasn"t existed. And that is why the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board in the US disseminate “educational” materials that address “misconceptions about lactose intolerance” according to research in Born With a Junk Food Deficiency, How Flaks, Quacks, and Hacks Pimp the Public Health. The marketing groups bragged to Congress that they regularly assure people in such ethnic groups that their lactose intolerance “should not be a barrier to including milk in the diet,” in an ongoing effort to help US dairy farmers. Ka-ching.


Battling “misconceptions” about lactose intolerance is only one of many marketing campaigns by the dairy lobby. Since the 1990s, the National Dairy Promotion and Research Board and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board have partnered with the USDA to push milk drinking, which had been falling since the 1970s, especially among teens and tweens. The promotions even have included partnerships with fast-food restaurants like Wendy’s and McDonald’s, who would seem unlikely comrades for a government agency sworn to protect the public health.


The milk campaigns began in the early 1990s with the catchphrase “Milk: It Does a Body Good” and used top model Tyra Banks and musician Marc Anthony to push milk for strong bones. “One in five victims of osteoporosis is male,” said the Banks ads. “Don’t worry. Calcium can help prevent it.” “Shake it, don’t break it. Want strong bones?” said the Anthony ad.  “Drinking enough lowfat milk now can help prevent osteoporosis later.” The ads were targeted toward African Americans, Latinos and men though all of the groups are among the least likely to get osteoporosis!


Next, the dairy lobby promoted milk as a treatment for premenstrual syndrome or PMS. Television ads showed bumbling boyfriends and husbands rushing to the store for milk to detoxify their stricken women. The ads disappeared as it became evident the study on which the campaign was based credited calcium not milk with helping PMS. And calcium is found in many sources besides milk–including the calcium-fortified juices that the milk ads are designed to sell against. Oops.


Then milk marketers tried to portray milk as a diet food that would help people lose weight until the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Bureau of Consumer Protection told them to cease “until further research provides stronger, more conclusive evidence of an association between dairy consumption and weight loss.”


Susan Ruland, spokesperson for the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Board, begged to differ. “There’s a strong body of scientific evidence that demonstrates a connection between dairy and weight loss,” she said, although she promised that future ads would comply. After the FTC clampdown, marketing materials claimed that low-fat dairy products do not necessarily add weight and may have “certain nutrients that can help consumers meet dietary requirements”–pretty much the definition of “food” when you think about. Soon the ads “went negative” and read, “Soft drinks and other sweetened beverages are now the leading source of calories in a teen’s diet and these nutrient-void beverages are increasingly taking the place of milk.” Take that!


The factually-challenged campaigns did not made a dent in posters of mustache-wearing actors, sports figures, musicians and models shipped to 60,000 US elementary schools and 45,000 middle schools in outrageous promotion of private industry by the government. In-school milk promotions have included  the “Healthiest Student Bodies,” which promised students they could win an iPod, Fender guitar and other prizes if they visited the milk marketing site. And students at three California high schools got a chance to create their own “Got Milk?” campaigns to sell milk to their peers and win a $ 2,000, an all-expense-paid trip to San Francisco to present their ideas to the milk advertising agency.


Needless to say, milk is hardly a health food that the government should be promoting to children. It is linked to obesity, cholesterol and other life-long health problems. Mega dairies are also notorious for environmental, worker and animal abuse and often called “environmental crack houses.”


Of course, in addition to its marketing efforts with the USDA, the dairy industry has rolled out products and supplements that help people with lactose intolerance “enjoy all the great taste of dairy and avoid the discomfort,” and drink more milk. Now, Big Pharma is joining in the dairy industry"s decades-long history of recruiting more milk drinkers with specious marketing.  Big Pharma now suggests that people can overcome their milk allergy by taking a genetically altered drug that is linked to cancers and deaths!


The drug Xolair, omalizumab, a member of an immune-suppressing class of drugs, reduced symptoms of milk allergies said researchers at the recent American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology annual meeting. “I think the evidence is pretty strong that it does make a significant difference,” said a coauthor of the research, Hugh Sampson, MD of Mount Sinai Hospital who reports eight financial links to Big Pharma companies.


Xolair and other recombinant DNA-derived monoclonal antibody drugs like Cimzia, Enbrel, Humira and Remicade can make as much as $ 10,000 to $ 20,000 a year per patient for Big Pharma. In patients who actually need them, like those with autoimmune diseases, they are important drugs. But since the “MoAbs” debuted, it has been a race to the bottom for Big Pharma to find everyday conditions which could justify prescribing the expensive, injected drugs.


Remember how antipsychotic drugs like Seroquel, approved for schizophrenia, soon became drugs of choice for every day depression and the “blues”? That is the same marketing plan for MoAbs (called “indication creep”) which are now marketed for everyday asthma, skin conditions, indigestion and now, apparently food allergies. If private and government health insurers want to fork over millions for the bio-engineered Franken drugs which are “meddling with Mother Nature,” according to the People"s Pharmacy that merely loots tax dollars and raises insurance premiums. But the drugs also kill.


MoAbs cause TB, cancers and super infections according to their labels because they suppress the immune system. Xolair was investigated by the FDA for links to heart attack and stroke and 77 people who took Xolair had life-threatening allergic responses in a year and a half, according to FDA reports. This is a drug to treat milk allergies?


There is also a shadow over Xolair’s clinical trials. They were conducted at Vivra which was investigated twice by the FDA for procedural irregularities. Trials of Xolair and at least seven other drugs were corrupted by protocol violations and outright falsifications, according to a former clinical research subinvestigator who worked at the facility. San Mateo, Calif.-based Vivra Asthma & Allergy was the nation’s largest respiratory disease physician practices until a merger with Lakewood, Colo.-based Gambro in 1997 and with El Segundo, Calif.-based DaVita in 2005.


Once again Pharma has a dangerous, expensive drug that almost no one needs and is creating lame and contrived uses. And once again the dairy industry will sink as low as it needs to, to sell product. Does anyone believe someone should tamper with their immune system just to drink milk? Except, of course, Big Pharma and the dairy industry?




 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Most of What You Think You Know About Milk Is Probably Dairy Industry Lies

Sunday, February 16, 2014

Europe embraces healthy raw dairy by unveiling fresh milk vending machines

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Europe embraces healthy raw dairy by unveiling fresh milk vending machines

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Self-Sufficient Home Recipes: Easy to Make Raw Milk Cheese

Self-Sufficient Home Recipes: Easy to Make Raw Milk Cheese
http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/raw-cheese.jpg


raw-cheese


image_pdfimage_print

(Truthstream Media.com)


Homemade just tastes better – plus, we get to control the ingredients.


Melissa and I got some raw milk from the farm and a simple cheese making kit. From there, we figured out how to make some simple and delicious farmer’s cheese from raw milk and take one more small step to self-sufficiency and self-reliance.


By the way, did you know that over 90% of cheeses produced in North America are made with GMO rennet? Worse, the ingredient labels make no distinction. Not this cheese!


RELATED: The Importance of Knowing Your Rennet – Fifth Town Artisan Cheese Co.


Preppers, off-gridders, homesteaders, independents, families, government refuseniks and more can also benefit from this easy cheese making skill.


Please check out our videos on:


Raw Milk Freedom
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUiUcKO98fY


Bone Soup: An Easy Immune Boosting Broth
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ha3e0GY0qAc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKht7BAhQQ8


Raw Vegetable Juicing (for Health!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5rRF24yaCc


Growing Sprouts: Healthy, Fresh Food in 3 Days!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrg9HdicYAI


Plus even more coming soon… (Hint: Kombucha and Probiotics)




Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton

Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton created Truthstream Media.com as an outlet to examine the news, uncover the deceptions, pierce through the fabric of illusions, know the real enemy, unshackle from the system, and begin to imagine the path towards taking back our lives, one step at a time, so that one day we might truly be free…




Truthstream Media




Read more about Self-Sufficient Home Recipes: Easy to Make Raw Milk Cheese and other interesting subjects concerning The Edge at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, August 25, 2013

A Co-op Story: Milk Not Jails


Things are changing in the prison system. On Monday, the country’s top law enforcer – Attorney General, Eric J. Holder Jr. — said he would order all of his prosecutors to avert mandatory minimum sentences for low-level drug offenders.


“Too many Americans go to too many prisons for far too long, and for no good law enforcement reason,” Holder told the American Bar Association. And two days later, (this Wednesday), the world’s largest association for correctional officers passed its own resolution to “eliminate” mandatory minimum sentences.


“ACA’s members know from long and first-hand experience that crowding within correctional systems increases violence, threatens overall security within a facility, and hampers rehabilitation efforts,” American Corrections Association President Chris Epps said in a statement accompanying the resolution.


Change is clearly afoot. What is making that change? While clearly economics, budgets and the long, sad, experience of over-sentencing have contributed to the sense of disatisfaction with the decades-long status quo, activists such as Lauren Melodia, co-founder and co-organizer of the grassroots organization Milk Not Jails, have been ahead of the game. The U.S. spent $ 80 billion dollars on incarceration in 2010; the New York State prison system spent $ 3.5 billion. As Melodia points that’s just not sustainable:


“New York state’s prison system is too big…it’s bigger than the department of education, the department of agriculture, and the department of transportation,” Melodia told GRITtv in this special report, this summer. The system has also bitterly divided the population along race lines, swelling incarceration rates disproportionately among Black and Latino Americans without reducing, say, drug addiction.


Milk Not Jails was founded in 2010 and seeks to throw a wrench in the wheels of the prison economy. How? By investing in New York state’s agricultural industry. The prison system in New York employs over 30,000 people, mostly in rural towns. Those residents depend largely on prison jobs as a form of income. Through forming a strategic alliance with dairy farmers Milk Not Jails wants to end rural dependency on the prison economy.


“Our ideal vision for the Milk Not Jails social enterprise is that it be a producer and worker-owned business so that the farmers…and our sales, marketing and distribution for us in the city are all invested, all making decisions for it and figuring out what to do with the profits,” Melodia says.


Milk Not Jails employs the formerly incarcerated: some of the same people who may have been held in those upstate prisons mere months or years before. In a job market that is inhospitable to people who have been imprisoned, one hope of Milk Not Jails is to give those with a criminal record more economic agency. In a system that often fails, Milk Not Jails is building a new base for opportunity.




Truthout Stories



A Co-op Story: Milk Not Jails

Friday, August 16, 2013

Sri Lankan court bars sale of Fonterra milk products for two weeks


Wednesday, August 7, 2013

China fines milk powder makers $110 million for price fixing




Chinese commercial law enforcement personnel inspect milk powder products at a supermarket in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province August 6, 2013. REUTERS/China Daily


1 of 3. Chinese commercial law enforcement personnel inspect milk powder products at a supermarket in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province August 6, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/China Daily






SHANGHAI/BEIJING | Wed Aug 7, 2013 6:24am EDT



SHANGHAI/BEIJING (Reuters) – China fined six companies, including Mead Johnson Nutrition Co, Danone and New Zealand dairy giant Fonterra, a total of $ 110 million following an investigation into price fixing and anti-competitive practices by foreign baby formula makers.


The other three penalised were Abbott Laboratories, Dutch dairy cooperative FrieslandCampina and Hong Kong-listed Biostime International Holdings, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) said on Wednesday.


The fines, which follow a four-month antitrust probe by the NDRC, coincide with separate pricing investigations into 60 foreign and local pharmaceutical firms as well as companies involved in gold trading. Those probes have yet to conclude.


The official Xinhua news agency said the fines were a record for China, although it did not elaborate.


“These are really significant fines for China, which has typically not issued large fines for antitrust violations,” said Peter Wang, an antitrust expert and Shanghai-based partner for law firm Jones Day.


Foreign infant formula is coveted in the world’s second biggest economy, where public trust was damaged by a 2008 scandal in which six infants died and thousands became ill after drinking milk tainted with the toxic industrial compound melamine.


Foreign brands account for about half of total sales and can sell for more than double the price of local formula. The infant milk market in China is set to grow to $ 25 billion by 2017 from $ 12.4 billion in 2012, according to data from Euromonitor.


The NDRC said in a statement the fines were for restricting competition, setting curbs on minimum prices for distributors and for using a variety of methods to disrupt market order.


It fined U.S.-based Mead Johnson 203.8 million yuan ($ 33.29 million); French food group Danone 172 million yuan; Biostime 162.9 million yuan; Abbott 77 million yuan; FrieslandCampina 48 million yuan and Fonterra 4 million yuan.


All of the companies said they would not contest the penalties.


Swiss giant Nestle, Japan’s Meiji Holdings and Zhejiang Beingmate Scientific Technology Industry and Trade Co Ltd were not punished because “they cooperated with the investigation, provided important evidence and carried out active self-rectification”, Xinhua quoted Xu Kunlin, the head of the NDRC’s price department, as saying.


Xu said the probe began in March, but was only made public in early July. After the NDRC probe was announced, a number of companies, including Mead Johnson, Danone and Nestle, cut prices on their baby formula in China by up to 20 percent.


Chinese firm Biostime was fined the equivalent of 6 percent of its 2012 China sales, the highest of those penalised, because it “seriously violated the anti-monopoly law and failed to actively take corrective action”, Xu said. Biostime imports most of its products.


Mead Johnson, the maker of Enfamil formula, was fined the equivalent of 4 percent of its 2012 sales because it “did not actively cooperate with the investigation but did take active self-rectification measures”, Xu added.


Danone, Abbott, FrieslandCampina and Fonterra were each fined 3 percent of last year’s sales after they cooperated in the probe and corrected improper practices.


“As a good corporate citizen, we are committed to addressing the concerns raised by the government and authorities in the market in which we do business and will comply with the fine stipulated by the NDRC,” FrieslandCampina said in an emailed statement.


FOREIGN FIRMS NOT HURT


Analysts said the probe was possibly part of a broader Chinese plan to boost consumption of local infant milk products.


But they said the fines were unlikely to damage the reputation of the affected companies. If anything, foreign infant formula makers might increase their market share because of the price cuts.


“It will have an impact on domestic brands over the long term as the prices of high-end premium brands come down. Customers will tend to buy the foreign brands as the price gap between domestic and foreign brands narrows,” said Jacqueline Ko, an analyst at Maybank Kim Eng Research.


Fonterra, the world’s biggest dairy exporter, said it would give additional training to sales staff and review its distributor contracts in the wake of its fine.


“We believe the investigation leaves us with a much clearer understanding of expectations around implementing pricing policies,” Kelvin Wickham, president of Fonterra Greater China and India, said in a statement.


Fonterra is embroiled in a separate milk powder contamination scare that has led to product recalls in China, Hong Kong and elsewhere in Asia.


The NDRC is one of China’s most powerful government bodies, with a role in overseeing prices as well as broad economic policies.


Wang from Jones Day said that while a Chinese firm got the biggest rap on the knuckles, foreign companies were clearly no longer insulated from NDRC investigations.


“It is a shift in that the foreign companies are so prominently being pursued. But that is normal. That is the way you would expect the antitrust system to mature,” Wang said.


The milk sector is still relatively young in China, with consumption of dairy products growing at an annual compound rate of 20 percent, a contrast to U.S. and European markets, where demand has been shrinking in the past decade.


Some analysts also said the pricing investigation could result in tougher rules governing imports.


The China Food and Drug Administration is proposing tightening conditions for the granting of licences for milk powder production, including requiring producers to have their own controlled milk sources and research and development capabilities.


In a statement late on Tuesday, the regulator said it was seeking public comment on the proposals, which also include requirements for licence holders to strengthen hygiene practices and management standards.


Mead Johnson said its fine would reduce its full-year earnings by about 12 cents per share, but it reiterated its 2013 earnings forecast for profit, excluding one-time items, of $ 3.22 to $ 3.30 per share.


Shares of Biostime, which has a market value of $ 3.3 billion, were up 5.3 percent at midday, beating a 0.3 percent drop in the benchmark index. It shares resumed trading after being suspended the day before.


($ 1 = 6.1217 Chinese yuan)


(Additional reporting by Lisa Baertlein in Los Angeles, Martinne Geller and Bill Berkrot in New York, Toni Clarke in Washington, Jonathan Standing and Li Hui in Beijing, Alexandra Harney in Shanghai and Anne Marie Roantree in Hong Kong Writing by Kazunori Takada; Editing by Dean Yates and Ron Popeski)





Reuters: Business News



China fines milk powder makers $110 million for price fixing

China fines milk powder makers $110 million for price fixing


Chinese commercial law enforcement personnel inspect milk powder products at a supermarket in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province August 6, 2013. REUTERS/China Daily

Chinese commercial law enforcement personnel inspect milk powder products at a supermarket in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province August 6, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/China Daily






SHANGHAI/HONG KONG | Wed Aug 7, 2013 1:22am EDT



SHANGHAI/HONG KONG (Reuters) – China fined six companies including Mead Johnson Nutrition Co, Danone and New Zealand dairy giant Fonterra a total of $ 110 million following an investigation into price fixing and anti-competitive practices by foreign baby formula makers.


The other three penalized were Abbott Laboratories, Dutch dairy cooperative FrieslandCampina and Hong Kong-listed Biostime International Holdings, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) said on Wednesday.


The fines, announced just over a month after the NDRC said it was conducting the antitrust review, coincide with separate pricing investigations into foreign and local pharmaceutical firms as well as companies involved in gold trading. Those probes have yet to conclude.


The official Xinhua news agency said the fines were a record for China, although it did not elaborate.


Foreign infant formula is coveted in China, where public trust was damaged by a 2008 scandal in which six infants died and thousands of others were sickened after drinking milk tainted with the toxic industrial compound melamine.


Foreign brands account for about half of total sales and can sell for more than double the price of local formula. The infant milk market in the world’s second biggest economy is set to grow to $ 25 billion by 2017.


The NDRC said in a statement the fines were for restricting competition, setting curbs on minimum prices for distributors and for using a variety of methods to disrupt market order.


Swiss giant Nestle, Japan’s Meiji Holdings and Zhejiang Beingmate Scientific Technology Industry and Trade Co Ltd were not punished because “they cooperated with the investigation, provided important evidence and carried out active self-rectification”, Xinhua said, citing the NDRC.


The commission fined Mead Johnson 203.8 million yuan ($ 33.29 million); Danone 172 million yuan; Biostime 162.9 million yuan; Abbott 77 million yuan; FrieslandCampina 48 million yuan and Fonterra 4 million yuan.


Mead Johnson, Biostime, Abbott and Fonterra said they would not contest the penalties. Officials at French food group Danone and FrieslandCampina were not immediately available to comment.


After the NDRC probe was announced, a number of companies including Mead Johnson, Danone and Nestle cut prices on their baby formula in China by up to 20 percent.


Analysts said the probe was possibly part of a broader Chinese plan to boost consumption of local infant milk products.


But they said the fines were unlikely to damage the reputation of the affected companies. If anything, foreign infant formula makers might increase their market share because of the price cuts.


“It will have an impact on domestic brands over the long term as the prices of high-end premium brands come down. Customers will tend to buy the foreign brands as the price gap between domestic and foreign brands narrows,” said Jacqueline Ko, an analyst at Maybank Kim Eng Research.


Fonterra, the world’s biggest dairy exporter, said it would give additional training to sales staff and review its distributor contracts in the wake of its fine.


“We believe the investigation leaves us with a much clearer understanding of expectations around implementing pricing policies,” Kelvin Wickham, president of Fonterra Greater China and India, said in a statement.


Fonterra is embroiled in a separate milk powder contamination scare that has led to product recalls in China, Hong Kong and elsewhere in Asia.


POWERFUL COMMISSION


A source with direct knowledge of the China investigation said the NDRC was concerned with manufacturers suggesting retail prices to distributors and then offering incentives if these were met, believing this was tantamount to dictating retail prices.


The agency also told the firms they had inhibited fair competition by setting up regional distributors and discouraging them from selling outside their territories, said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not allowed to speak to the media.


The commission is one of China’s most powerful government bodies, with a role in overseeing prices as well as broad economic policies.


The milk sector is still relatively young in China, with consumption of dairy products growing at an annual compound rate of 20 percent, a contrast to U.S. and European markets where demand has been shrinking in the past decade.


Some analysts also said the pricing investigation could result in tougher rules governing imports.


Indeed, the China Food and Drug Administration is proposing tightening conditions for the granting of licenses for milk powder production, including requiring producers to have their own controlled milk sources and research and development capabilities.


In a statement late on Tuesday, the regulator said it was seeking public comment on the proposals, which also include requirements for license holders to strengthen hygiene practices and management standards.


Mead Johnson said its fine would reduce its full-year earnings by about 12 cents per share, but it reiterated its 2013 earnings forecast for profit, excluding one-time items, of $ 3.22 to $ 3.30 per share.


Shares of Biostime, which has a market value of $ 3.3 billion, were up 5.3 percent at midday, beating a 0.3 percent drop in the benchmark index. It shares resumed trading after being suspended the day before.


($ 1 = 6.1217 Chinese yuan)


(Additional reporting by Lisa Baertlein in Los Angeles, Martinne Geller and Bill Berkrot in New York, Toni Clarke in Washington, Jonathan Standing, Li Hui and Michael Martina in Beijing and Alexandra Harney in Shanghai. Writing by Kazunori Takada; Editing by Dean Yates)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



China fines milk powder makers $110 million for price fixing

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Fonterra under fire over milk scare; more product recalls

WELLINGTON (Reuters) – Fonterra, the world’s largest dairy exporter, came under fire from the New Zealand government, farmers and financial regulators for its handling of a food contamination scare that has triggered product recalls and spooked parents from China to Saudi Arabia.


Reuters: Top News



Fonterra under fire over milk scare; more product recalls

Sunday, August 4, 2013

China bans New Zealand milk powder imports on botulism scare: NZ trade min




WELLINGTON | Sun Aug 4, 2013 12:11am EDT



WELLINGTON (Reuters) – China has halted imports of all New Zealand milk powder, New Zealand’s trade minister said on Sunday, after bacteria that can cause botulism found in some dairy products raised food safety concerns that threatened its $ 9.4 billion annual dairy trade.


Global dairy trade giant Fonterra said on Saturday it had sold contaminated New Zealand-made whey protein concentrate to eight customers in Australia, China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand and Saudi Arabia for use in a range of products, including infant milk powder.


Nearly 90 percent of China’s $ 1.9 billion in milk powder imports last year originated in New Zealand, so a prolonged ban could result in a shortage of dairy products in China.


Foreign-branded infant formula in particular is a prized commodity in China given consumer distrust of Chinese brands after a series of domestic food safety scandals.


New Zealand’s neighbor Australia was caught up in the ban after some of the contaminated whey protein concentrate was exported there before being sent on to China and elsewhere.


“The authorities in China, in my opinion absolutely appropriately, have stopped all imports of New Zealand milk powders from Australia and New Zealand,” New Zealand Trade Minister Tim Groser told Television New Zealand on Sunday.


“It’s better to do blanket protection for your people and then wind it back when we, our authorities, are in a position to give them the confidence and advice that they need before doing that,” he said.


There was no official word of a ban from Chinese authorities early on Sunday.


On Saturday, Chinese state radio said Fonterra was notifying three Chinese firms affected by the contamination. Some of China’s biggest food and beverage companies are said to be customers of Fonterra, using its milk powder as an ingredient in everything from confectionery to cheese on frozen pizza.


Fonterra is a major supplier of bulk milk powder products used in formula in China but it had stayed out of branding after Chinese dairy company Sanlu, in which it had held a large stake, was found to have added melamine – often used in plastics – to bulk up formulas in 2008. More than six children died in the industry-wide scandal and hundreds were made sick.


BANS, RECALLS


Other countries also were reportedly halting imports and ordering recalls of New Zealand-made dairy products.


Russia has suspended imports and circulation of Fonterra products, Russia’s ITAR-TASS news agency said on Saturday, quoting consumer watchdog Rospotrebnadzor.


Media reports late on Saturday said Thailand had ordered a recall of Fonterra products imported since May.


New Zealand’s Ministry of Primary Industries said five batches of follow-on baby formula marketed by Karicare, a popular brand in China, had been contaminated by the bacteria, although none had entered the retail supply chain.


Those products sitting in storage facilities would be held back from the market, it said.


Farmer-owned Fonterra is a big supplier of wholesale dairy ingredients to multinational food and beverage companies. It also markets its own consumer brands, including Anchor milk in New Zealand and Anlene and Anmum maternal milk formula, which is available in Southeast Asia and other regions.


It said all of its own brands were free of contamination and that there had been no reports of any illness linked to the affected whey protein. It added that Fonterra CEO Theo Spierings was travelling to China to discuss the issue.


The incident is the second this year involving New Zealand’s largest company. In January, Fonterra said it had found traces of dicyandiamde, a potentially toxic chemical used in fertilizer, in some of its products.


The bacteria behind the latest scare, Clostridium Botulinum, is often found in soil. The Fonterra case was caused by a dirty pipe at a processing plant.


It can cause botulism, a potentially fatal disease that affects the muscles and can cause respiratory problems. Infant botulism can attack the intestinal system.


The contamination issue comes as China has started to tighten dairy import regulations to improve overall food safety. In recent weeks, Beijing has introduced regulations restricting the operations of smaller infant formula brands.


New Zealand’s dairy industry is a big driver of the country’s agriculture-based economy, with its NZ$ 12 billion in exports last year accounting for around 25 percent of total merchandise exports. ($ 1 = 1.2767 New Zealand dollars)


(Additional reporting by Lincoln Feast in Sydney; Editing by Paul Tait)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



China bans New Zealand milk powder imports on botulism scare: NZ trade min