Showing posts with label Charts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Charts. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Charts: Why Fast-Food Workers Are Going on Strike



This Thursday, fast-food workers in more than 100 cities are planning a one-day strike to demand a “livable” wage of $ 15 an hour. They have a point: The lowest-paid Americans are struggling to keep up with the cost of living—and they have seen none of the gains experienced by the country’s top earners. While average incomes of the top 1 percent grew more than 270 percent since 1960, those of the bottom 90 percent grew 22 percent. And the real value of the minimum wage barely budged, increasing a total of 7 percent over those decades.


More of the numbers behind the strike and the renewed calls to raise the minimum wage:


Median hourly wage for fast-food workers nationwide:
$ 8.94/hour


Increase in real median wages for food service workers since 1999:
$ 0.10/hour


Last time the federal minimum wage exceeded $ 8.94/hour (in 2012 dollars):
1968


Change in the real value of the minimum wage since 1968:
-22%



Median age of fast-food workers:
29


Median age of female fast-food workers:
32


Percentage of fast-food workers who are women:
65%


Percentage of fast-food workers older than 20 who have kids:
36%


Income of someone earning $ 8.94/hour:
$ 18,595/year


Federal poverty line for a family of three:
$ 17,916/year


Income of someone earning $ 15/hour:
$ 31,200/year


Income needed for a “secure yet modest” living for a family with two adults and one child…
In the New York City area: $ 77,378/year
In rural Mississippi: $ 47,154/year


Growth in average real income of the top 1 percent since 1960:
271%


What the current minimum wage would be if it had grown at the same rate as top incomes:
More than $ 25



How would you and your family fare on a typical fast-food paycheck? How much does it really take to make ends meet in your city or state? Use this calculator to get a better sense of what fast-food workers are up against.







$  





Politics | Mother Jones



Charts: Why Fast-Food Workers Are Going on Strike

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Charts: Income Growth Has Stalled for Most Americans

Yesterday the Census Bureau released its latest income data, confirming what millions of Americans already know: The recession may be over, but the recovery has yet to trickle down. Specifically, the Census reported that median household incomes didn’t budge between 2011 and 2012.


Digging deeper into the new data reveals more evidence of the widening income gap between the rich and the rest. 


The only bright side of stalled incomes is that they are no longer experiencing the steep decline that started in 2007 before the recession hit. But that’s hardly cause for celebration: At $ 51,017, the real median household income in 2012 is even less than it was at the end of the ’80s, and it’s down 9 percent from its high in 1999.





This loss of real income hasn’t affected all Americans equally. For the top 20 percent of earners, average incomes grew 70 percent since 1967, and they grew 88 percent for the top 5 percent. Meanwhile, middle-income households have seen their earnings grow just 20 percent in the past four decades.     



This translates into a greater share of total income going to top earners. In 2012, the top 20 percent took in more than half of all income in the United States, according to the Census.



To put that into sharper focus, I’ve charted how each percentile’s share of total income has changed since the late ’60s. After experiencing significant growth in the mid-1970s, the bottom 20 percent of earners have seen their share steadily drop. Compare that with the top 5 and 20 percent, which have seen their piece of the pie expand in the past two decades while all other Americans’ shrunk.



This trend is also seen in the latest income data complied by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, which shows that the top 10 percent of earners now hold their largest share of total income since the eve of the Depression.



The new Census data on the bleak state of the American Dream came one day after Forbes released its latest list of 400 wealthiest Americans. Together, they are worth more than $ 2 trillion. The past year has been very good to them:


The average net worth of list members is a staggering $ 5 billion, $ 800 million more than a year ago and also a record. The minimum net worth needed to make the 400 list was $ 1.3 billion. The last time it was that high was in 2007 and 2008, before property and stock market values began sliding. Because the bar is so high, 61 American billionaires didn’t make the cut.



As Piketty and Saez report, 95 percent of all income growth between 2009 and 2012 went to the 1 percent.


Sources: Chart 1: Census Bureau, “Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2012″ (PDF); charts 2-4: Census Bureau historical income data; chart 5: Emmanuel Saez, UC Berkeley (Excel)


Front page image: rangizzz/Shutterstock



Politics | Mother Jones



Charts: Income Growth Has Stalled for Most Americans

Thursday, June 27, 2013

VIDEO: Top Tech Stories of the Day: How Do You Break Into IPhone App Store Top 50? Try 23K Free Daily Downloads







How Do You Break Into iPhone App Store Top 50? Try 23K Free Daily Downloads. Apple loses bid to include Galaxy S4 in Samsung suit. iTunes Radio royalty rates revealed-Apple pays more than Pandora













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.







To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Top Tech Stories of the Day: How Do You Break Into IPhone App Store Top 50? Try 23K Free Daily Downloads

Friday, April 5, 2013

REPORT: Partisanship And Diversity On The Sunday Shows In 9 Charts

The four broadcast networks’ Sunday morning political talk shows guests skewed right during the first quarter of 2013. MSNBC’s two Sunday programs featured far greater gender and ethnic diversity in its guests than the broadcast programs and CNN’s Sunday morning political talk show.


Republicans And Conservatives Dominate Broadcast Networks’ Sunday Show Guest Lineups


Broadcast Networks Hosted Republican And Conservative Guests Most Often. Out of 400 total guests hosted by ABC’s This Week, CBS’ Face the Nation, NBC’s Meet the Press, and Fox’s Fox News Sunday during the first three months of 2013, 40 percent were either Republicans or conservatives while only 29 percent were Democrats or progressives. Centrist, nonpartisan, and ideologically neutral guests made up 31 percent. 



Each Network Hosted More Guests From The Right Than The Left. Republicans and conservatives outpaced Democrats and progressives on all four networks. Fox News Sunday had the largest discrepancy, with 53 percent of guests being Republicans or conservatives and only 24 percent being Democrats or progressives.



Elected Republicans Were Hosted More Often Than Elected Democrats And Obama Administration Officials. Except for Face the Nation, elected Republicans were featured on the Sunday shows significantly more often than elected Democrats and Obama administration officials combined. Again, Fox News Sunday was the worst offender, with 67 percent of guests in this category being Republicans.



Elected Republicans Featured In More Solo Interviews Than Elected Democrats and Obama Administration Officials. On Fox News Sunday and Meet the Press particularly, Republicans received significantly more solo interviews than Democrats. When adjusting for the amount of time devoted to interviewees as opposed to the raw number of interviews, the contrast between Republicans and Democrats grows even larger on Meet The Press. And while Face the Nation has given more solo interviews to Democrats, that lead shrinks when accounting for the amount of time devoted to interviewees. This Week — despite hosting more Republicans for solo interviews than Democrats in raw number — gave Democrats more total time during their interviews.



Four Of The Top Five Guests With The Most Solo Interviews Were Republicans. Leading the pack was Senator John McCain (R-AZ) and former Republican Governor Jeb Bush with five solo interviews each. Mitch McConnell (R-KY), Paul Ryan (R-WI), and senior Obama advisor David Plouffe round out the top five with four interviews each.


Partisan And Ideological Journalists Were More Likely To Be Conservative Than Progressive. While a majority of journalists, pundits, and commentators on these programs were neutral, when partisan and ideological journalists were hosted, they were much more likely to be conservative nearly across the board. Once again, this disparity was especially true on Fox News Sunday, where 47 percent of journalist guests were conservative. 



Imbalanced Panels Overwhelmingly Tilted To The Right. On all four networks, when roundtable and panel discussions were imbalanced, they were far more likely to be tilted in favor of conservatives. Fox News Sunday was the worst again, with 65 percent of panels having more conservative guests than progressives and none having more progressive guests than conservatives. 



MSNBC Provides Greater Guest Diversity Than Broadcast Networks, CNN


MSNBC’s Sunday Shows Hosted Significantly More Women Than Those Of The Broadcast Networks Or CNN’s State Of The Union. Melissa Harris-Perry and Up with Chris Hayes hosted women 45 percent and 38 percent of the time, respectively. Meet the Press was the worst in this category; only 20 percent of the program’s guests were women.



MSNBC’s Guests Were Much More Ethnically Diverse Than Broadcast Shows Or CNN. Melissa Harris-Perry was the only show to host a majority of non-white guests — 39 percent of guests were African-American, 4 percent were Latino, 4 percent were Asian-American, and 1 were percent Arab-American. Up was still significantly more diverse than broadcast and CNN, with 37 percent of guests being non-white. No other program had a guest pool that was less than 82 percent white; Fox News Sunday was the least ethnically diverse, with 91 percent of guests being white.



MSNBC’s Programs Were The Only Ones Not Dominated By White Men. Both Melissa Harris-Perry and Up hosted white men in line with their representation in the general population (approximately 39 percent, according to U.S. Census data). By contrast, white men were significantly overrepresented on the broadcast and CNN Sunday shows.



Methodology


This study followed the same methodology as the previous Media Matters study, “If It’s Sunday, It’s Still Conservative.”


We reviewed every edition of ABC’s This Week, CBS’ Face The Nation, NBC’s Meet The Press, Fox Broadcasting Co.’s Fox News Sunday, CNN’s State of the Union, and the Sunday editions of MSNBC’s Up with Chris Hayes and Melissa Harris-Perry during the first quarter of 2013. Guest appearances for all seven programs were coded for gender and ethnicity. Guests appearing on the four broadcast networks were also coded for whether they appeared in solo interviews or as part of a panel; whether they were journalists, administration officials, or elected officials; and for their partisanship or ideology.


These classifications do not represent an analysis of what guests actually said when they appeared on a show on a given date. Coding each guest’s comments for their ideological slant would have introduced enormous difficulties and opportunities for subjectivity. Instead, we simply classified guests based on their own ideological self-identification or public affiliation with an openly partisan or ideological organization or institution.


In the vast majority of cases, guests are clearly identifiable by their party or ideology (or as having none). Of course, in a few instances, these decisions were not as simple to make. We therefore constructed rules that could be applied as strictly as possible. Where a guest’s identification was in question, Media Matters chose to err on the side of listing that guest toward the left.


Following are some of the principal rules coders employed in classifying guests:


  • The party designations (Democratic and Republican) are reserved for current and former officeholders, candidates, campaign staff, political consultants associated with one party or the other, and administration officials. All others are labeled conservative, progressive, or neutral.

  • The neutral category does not necessarily imply strict ideological neutrality but, rather, might better be understood as neutral/centrist/nonpartisan — we use the term “neutral” for the sake of brevity.

  • When guests served in both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past, they were coded as neutral barring any compelling reason to do otherwise. In a few cases, however, a former official who had served under presidents from both parties became clearly identified with one ideology and were coded accordingly.

  • Our “Journalist” classification applies not only to daily reporters but also to opinion columnists, magazine writers, etc.

  • In the case of foreign officials and journalists, we labeled all as neutral — even though the political ideology of some might be identifiable — to avoid the need to analyze the politics of other countries. Foreign nationals were also excluded from the diversity analysis.

  • Active duty members of the armed forces were classified as members of the Obama administration. Retired officers were coded as neutral absent any other affiliation.

Ben Dimiero, Eric Hananoki, and Oliver Willis provided additional research. Charts by Alan Pyke.



Media Matters for America – Research Items



REPORT: Partisanship And Diversity On The Sunday Shows In 9 Charts