Showing posts with label Income. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Income. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

Stephen Colbert Takes Down Bill O"Reilly"s Insane Defense Of Income Inequality


I want to thank Stephen Colbert for taking the time to compile Bill O’Reilly’s nonsensical observations about American society. BillO thinks he’s found a bone to chew on with income equality, but his analogies are unhinged. If he thinks I’m trying to legislate that the federal government adds almost twenty four inches to my height so I’m equal in stature to Shaq, then he’s crazier than I thought.


Colbert rips his arguments to shreds in the only way he knows how: with humor.


O’Reilly: Equality is what is hurting President Obama. the left has seized that word “equality” to push it’s progressive agenda. We now have income equality, marriage equality, gender equality..And on and on and on…


Colbert: Yes, income, marriage, gender on and on and on. And yes those last three don’t mean anything, but they don’t mean anything equally.
And Bill laid out why fighting for equality is pointless.


O’Reilly: Each human being is born with abilities, but they are not equal abilities. I will never have physical equality with my fellow Irishmen Shaquille O’Neal. He’s bigger and stronger than I am by nature. I will never be as smart as Einstein As talented as Mozart as kind as Mother Teresa.



Colbert: Oh, Come on, Bill, that list is too modest. You’ll never be as fast as Usain Bolt or you’ll never be as emotionally mature as a toddler or understand how tides work as a middle schooler. You’ll never be as strong as a silver-back gorilla or win as many Oscars as Titanic.


O’Reilly’s logic is airtight.


read more



Latest from Crooks and Liars



Stephen Colbert Takes Down Bill O"Reilly"s Insane Defense Of Income Inequality

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Democrat Sponsored "Income Inequality"; Law of Bad Ideas, Yet Again

Democrat Sponsored "Income Inequality"; Law of Bad Ideas, Yet Again
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEioD2VJMoBfavWelVXlhWcs564Lta2F1qUO3D4nl0PkOaGFGLZrHxOZ57pXFDIVb0twyXXvr511wgl4HsGLj0eClDvqk8EiqA9kPUQti6rRGqZpYxMW_yA-3z73Yic5j8BGtP0N_rytKaI/s1600/San+Jose+Pensions.png

Debate rages over “income inequality”.


CEOs makes hundreds or thousands of times more than workers. That is one aspect of income inequality. And it’s easily explained: The Fed’s inflation policies, bank bailouts, Fractional Reserve Lending, and crony capitalism are to blame.


That blame is nonpartisan.


Rather than attack the problem, “progressive” partisans howl over minimum wages.


Democrat-Sponsored Income Inequality


There is one major aspect of “income inequality” that you never hear president Obama or the Democrats mention, precisely because they are to blame.


Democrat-sponsored “income inequality” is even more insidious because it directly affects middle-class American who pay high taxes so public employees can retire in comfort with gold-plated guaranteed-for-life pensions.


Gold-Plated Retirements


In support of my above thesis, please consider In San Jose, Generous Pensions for City Workers Come at Expense of Nearly All Else.

Here in the wealthy heart of Silicon Valley, the roads are pocked with potholes, the libraries are closed three days a week and a slew of city recreation centers have been handed over to nonprofit groups. Taxes have gone up even as city services are in decline, and Mayor Chuck Reed is worried.

The source of Reed’s troubles: gold-plated pensions that guarantee retired city workers as much as 90 percent of their former salaries. Retirement costs are eating up nearly a quarter of the city’s budget, forcing Reed (D) to skimp on everything else.



Employee costs are growing nearly five times faster than revenues leading to fewer workers and budget deficits.


“This is one of the dichotomies of California: I am cutting services to my low- and moderate-income people . . . to pay really generous benefits for public employees who make a good living and have an even better retirement,” he said in an interview in his office overlooking downtown.


In San Jose and across the nation, state and local officials are increasingly confronting a vision of startling injustice: Poor and middle-class taxpayers — who often have no retirement savings — are paying higher taxes so public employees can retire in relative comfort.


“I got sick and tired of cutting services to my people — 10 years of services cuts — in order to balance the budget,” Reed said. “We got to the point where we were facing service delivery insolvency.”


In California, cities large and small are struggling to pay the growing public-sector retirement tab. Meanwhile, 55 percent of the state’s private-sector workforce — 6.3 million — have no retirement plan on the job.


Other governments are also struggling. In Chicago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel (D) has been pushing to scale back pensions for city workers, warning that without reform, city services will wither. Rhode Island enacted pension reforms in 2011 that trimmed retirement benefits for new workers and for those already on the payroll.


Enter the Law of Bad Ideas


Instead of admitting the system is hopelessly broken, Sacramento lawmakers want to create the nation’s first retirement savings plan for private-sector workers in which the state manages the money and guarantees a minimum rate of return.


Both cities and the State of California are struggling to pay pensions, yet the proposed solution by California lawmakers is to have the state guarantee even more pensions.


Worst yet, this guarantee would come when treasury yields are in the gutter and stocks 50% overvalued and poised for losses in any time period shorter than seven years according to John Hussman (and I happen to agree). For details, please see It Is Informed Optimism To Wait For The Rain


Note: John Hussman is one of many great speakers at Wine Country Conference II. If you haven’t yet signed up, please do. 


For such ideas to be proposed at the worst time is mind-boggling, yet strictly in accordance with “The Law of Bad Ideas“.


A number of corollaries clearly apply.


Corollary Three: Those in positions of political power not only have the worst ideas, they also have the means to see those ideas are implemented.


Corollary Four: The worse the idea, the more likely it is to be embraced by academia and political opportunists.


Corollary Five: No politically acceptable idea is so bad it cannot be made worse.


The reason CEOs make out like bandits is explained in Monetarism, Abenomics, QE, and Minimum Wage Proposals: One Bad Idea Leads to Another, and Another 


Brief History


  • Monetarists act on the theory falling prices are a bad idea

  • The Fed prints money and holds rates too low

  • Housing bubble builds

  • Medical and education prices soar

  • Student loans soar to “help” the students

  • Because housing is not affordable numerous affordable housing programs appear causing still more unwarranted housing demand. Few see the bubble because housing is not in the CPI

  • Housing crashes

  • The affordable housing advocates are abhorred by falling prices

  • Fed bails out banks and steps in to support housing prices

  • Income inequality soars

  • Students remain stuck with debt

Because of one idiotic notion, that “falling prices are a bad thing”, the Fed has generally managed to keep the CPI rising, with some prices rising much faster than others.


That leads to corollary number six, mentioned in the above link:


Law of Bad Ideas Corollary Six: Bad ideas lead to more bad ideas to fix problems caused by previous bad ideas.


And so here we are. To bail out the absurd idea that public pension promises are supportable, complete with 7.5 to 8.0 percent annual returns, when 10-year treasuries yield 2.67%, California proposes insuring private pensions as well.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Read more about Democrat Sponsored "Income Inequality"; Law of Bad Ideas, Yet Again and other interesting subjects concerning Economy at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, January 19, 2014

Investment bank UBS to outsource fixed income trading platform

Investment bank UBS to outsource fixed income trading platform
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif



A man walks past the logo of Swiss Bank UBS on a footbridge connecting two office buildings in Zurich December 19, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Arnd Wiegmann




Reuters: Business News




Read more about Investment bank UBS to outsource fixed income trading platform and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Iraq needs Kurdish oil income to avert budget collapse -lawmaker

Iraq needs Kurdish oil income to avert budget collapse -lawmaker
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif





BAGHDAD Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:50am EST



BAGHDAD Jan 19 (Reuters) – Iraq cannot finance its projected 2014 budget deficit unless the northern Kurdistan region pays its oil export revenue into the national treasury – or loses its share of state spending, a senior lawmaker said on Sunday.


Haider al-Abadi, head of parliament’s treasury committee, told Reuters the budget, swollen by extra expenditure, would “collapse” if the state kept paying the autonomous region its 17 percent share even as the Kurds withhold oil export proceeds.


Baghdad’s chronic quarrel with Kurdistan over how to manage and share Iraq’s energy resources intensified this month when the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) said oil had begun flowing to Turkey for export via a pipeline outside federal control.


Last week Iraq’s oil minister threatened legal action and drastic trade reprisals against Turkey and any foreign companies involved in what he called the “smuggling” of Iraqi oil.


Kurdistan’s Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani arrived in the Iraqi capital on Sunday to pursue talks on an issue that has bedevilled relations between Iraq’s Arabs and minority Kurds.


“We go to Baghdad with the intention of closing gaps,” KRG spokesman Safeen Dizayee said before the talks, which he said would focus on increasing Kurdistan’s oil output and a mechanism for marketing its exports.


Abadi said the draft budget projected a deficit of about 21 trillion Iraqi dinars ($ 18 billion), assuming the Kurds paid the treasury the revenue from budgeted oil exports of 400,000 barrels per day – a target industry sources say far exceeds Kurdistan’s current export capacity of around 255,000 bpd.


To Baghdad’s fury, the Kurds handed over no oil export revenue last year because of an unresolved dispute over the payment of oil companies operating in the northern region.


For much of 2013 the Kurds were trucking what industry sources estimated was up to 60,000 bpd of crude and condensates to Turkey, while the independent pipeline was being completed.


In 2012, the Kurds exported 61,000 bpd of crude via the Baghdad-controlled pipeline to Turkey, so the revenue went automatically to the central government.


Baghdad complained at the time that the Kurds should have exported more than double this amount, however.


BUDGET CRUNCH


Abadi said state spending had risen sharply in the draft budget due to increases in pensions and the minimum public sector wage, child benefits and student allowances.


Echoing remarks made in the past week by Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and Oil Minister Abdul Kareem Luaibi, Abadi said the central government would have to cut the Kurds’ budget share.


“They are not contributing, so why should they get something out of it?” he asked in an interview. “At the moment we have a deficit of 21 trillion. If you add 15 to 16 trillion to it, the budget will collapse,” he said, estimating the additional shortfall if no Kurdish oil revenue is handed over.


Abadi, who is also a senior member of Maliki’s Shi’ite Islamist Dawa party, said time was running out for the budget to be passed before parliament is dissolved ahead of an election on April 30. He said it would be hard to muster a quorum of 163 of the assembly’s 325 members during an electoral campaign.


Kurdish and Sunni Muslim opposition lawmakers would stay away, as would MPs busy campaigning or those without a motive to turn up because they were not running for re-election, he said.


Abadi accused the Kurds of seeking to prolong oil talks until after the poll to entrench a fait accompli whereby they pocket their own revenue from oil “officially” piped to Turkey and still receive their 17 percent share of the federal budget.


Kurdish officials say that in practice Kurdistan receives closer to 10 percent of the national budget.


Even if the Kurds paid over notional oil revenues of 17 or 18 trillion dinars from exports of 400,000 bpd, Abadi said, Baghdad would only just be able to bridge its 2014 budget gap.


He said the withholding of Kurdistan’s earnings also violated a U.N. Security Council resolution under which all Iraqi oil export proceeds must be paid into a U.N.-approved account in New York from which five percent must be deducted to pay war reparations to Kuwait for Iraq’s 1990 invasion.






Reuters: Bonds News




Read more about Iraq needs Kurdish oil income to avert budget collapse -lawmaker and other interesting subjects concerning Bonds at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, December 20, 2013

Interesting Income Inequality Photos

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Interesting Income Inequality Photos

Monday, December 16, 2013

IMF wants you to pay 71% income tax

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



IMF wants you to pay 71% income tax

Sunday, December 15, 2013

The One Percent Is Hogging so Much of Our Income That It’s Holding the Economy Back

meanlifeAre the rich intentionally trying to make the rest of us poor, thus preserving their own power?  Anthony W. Orlando writes at Informed Comment:


We all know that inequality has been rising and the average American household has been suffering. There is a myth that says all this suffering is necessary, that extreme inequality is the by-product of a rapidly growing economy—or worse, that it’s a good thing because it motivates everyone to work hard and climb the long ladder to the One Percent.


Even a brief glance at the historical record reveals just how perverted this hypothesis is.


For one thing, the economy has not been growing rapidly since inequality started climbing. From 1950 to 1980, “real gross domestic product (GDP)”—the output of the economy, adjusted for inflation—grew by 3.8 percent per year. From 1980 to 2010, it grew by 2.7 percent per year. (Since then, it’s been even worse.)


So income inequality hasn’t been “growth-enhancing” at all. In fact, just the opposite.


The United States isn’t alone in this experience. Economists at the International Monetary Fund recently compiled the most comprehensive data set to date: 140 countries over 6 decades. They consistently found that countries with less inequality experienced stronger, more sustained economic growth and fewer, less severe recessions.


It’s been widely publicized, for example, that Europe has suffered from higher unemployment than the United States in recent years. Many Americans falsely believe that Europe is more equal than the U.S., but a new data set compiled by the economist James Galbraith and the University of Texas Inequality Project shows inequality between countries and regions across Europe for the first time—and they find that Europe has had higher inequality than us since the 1970s. It’s only within specific countries that inequality is lower than the U.S., and guess what: Those countries tend to have lower unemployment than us.


The reason is quite simple: Those workers are also consumers. When the 99 Percent earn more, they spend more, and the One Percent can produce more and earn more themselves.


“In this sense,” says the wealthy entrepreneur Nick Hanauer, “an ordinary middle-class consumer is far more of a job creator than a capitalist like me. […] Anyone who’s ever run a business knows that hiring more people is a capitalist’s course of last resort, something we do only when increasing customer demand requires it.”


Or, as the late economist Michal Kalecki used to say, “The workers spend what they get and the capitalists get what they spend.” What he meant by that was that the rich can afford to save more of their income—and, indeed, we find that the One Percent continue to save 15 to 25 percent, while the saving rate of the 99 Percent has plummeted close to zero. If too much money goes to the One Percent and not enough to the 99 Percent, the economy will save more and more and spend less and less, until there isn’t enough consumer demand to justify increasing production and investment. Thus, the economy will slow down.



Read more here.


The post The One Percent Is Hogging so Much of Our Income That It’s Holding the Economy Back appeared first on disinformation.




disinformation



The One Percent Is Hogging so Much of Our Income That It’s Holding the Economy Back

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Obama: Income inequality a defining challenge

Obama: Income inequality a defining challenge

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama turned his focus Wednesday to the pocketbook issues that Americans consistently rank as a top concern, arguing that the dream of upward economic mobility is breaking down and the growing income gap is a “defining challenge of our time.”
Business Headlines



Read more about Obama: Income inequality a defining challenge and other interesting subjects concerning Economy at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Cash Bern: Swiss may grant unconditional income for all

Cash Bern: Swiss may grant unconditional income for all
http://thedailynewsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/2dc6b_RT_default.jpg



Cash Bern: Swiss may grant unconditional income for all

Swiss citizens are demanding a crucial change in the constitution, pushing for the introduction of a guaranteed income for everyone. RT teamed up with RUPTLY…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Cash Bern: Swiss may grant unconditional income for all and other interesting subjects concerning World News Videos at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Thursday, October 17, 2013

VIDEO: American Air Parent AMR Posts Better Quarterly Results









(Reuters) – American Airlines parent AMR Corp reported improved third-quarter results on Thursday, aided by bankruptcy cost-cutting.













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.







To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: American Air Parent AMR Posts Better Quarterly Results

Tuesday, October 15, 2013

Blast from the Past: Harry Reid Claimed Income Taxes are “Voluntary”



Source: libertyblitzkrieg.com


With Harry Reid in deep negotiations with crony Republican fraud Mitch McConnell, the American public is surely in the process of getting royally screwed once again. Thus, it seems like an appropriate time to revisit an interview in which Mr. Reid claimed on camera that income taxes are “voluntary.” He must have accidentally described the way members of Congress view taxes, you know kind of like how they view insider trading. 


As you watch, try not to get too distracted by Jan Helfeld’s tie. Where can you even buy something like that?!





BlackListedNews.com



Blast from the Past: Harry Reid Claimed Income Taxes are “Voluntary”

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Are posh university flats promising investors 7% income worth a look?


By Lee Boyce


|


The words ‘luxury’ and ‘student accommodation’ are not two that instantly gel. However, one student home developer has just started its sixth upmarket project in two years offering investors a meaty return in the process.


Vita Student has launched a new £17million student accommodation scheme in Exeter, Devon, which promises investors a seven per cent yield guaranteed for five years – a figure considerably higher than the current average buy-to-let yield. 


So is an eye-catching offer like this worth a look, what exactly does a guaranteed income return look like and what are the catches? Lee Boyce takes a look.


Student living: The Exeter accommodation was launched to investors last Monday and has sold half of its apartments

Student living: The Exeter accommodation was launched to investors last Monday and has sold half of its apartments



The new Vita launch comes hot off the heels of three projects in Liverpool and one in Manchester and Bristol, bringing the total number of apartments it has in its portfolio to nearly 1,000.


The Exeter Portland House development – which will have 161 apartments available for investors starting from £77,950 – is due to be completed in time for the 2014/15 academic year. Within a week of launch last Monday, 55 per cent apartments had been sold.


Vita Student’s previous launch – Colston Avenue in Bristol – saw 132 apartments sell-out within seven weeks.


Its first project, The Chapel in Liverpool, was launched in March 2012 and was sold out by June 2012. The 67 studio apartments, which started from £57,950, have recently taken the first of its influx of students. Weekly rent starts from £119, with bills included.


All this has come as the student property market has roared ahead.


Investment in the student property sector is at its highest point, according to global estate agent Jones Lang LaSalle, with £2.7billion spent in the market in 2012 – a 125 per cent increase from 2011.


This could be looked at from two opposing perspectives, either investors are cottoning on to a lucrative and growing success story, or a bubble is forming.


Luxury: The student rooms in Exeter will come equipped with a high-end finish and fast internet connection

Luxury: The student rooms in Exeter will come equipped with a high-end finish and fast internet connection



Trevor Moore, CEO of Vita Ventures, said: ‘Investor requirement for student property like ours is at an all-time high.


‘We are able to deliver such a high yield by driving efficiencies at every level of the construction and operational process while in turn generating high rental returns from students who are willing to pay a premium for the facilities and level of service we provide.


‘The rate at which all our projects have sold demonstrates that our model is successfully addressing the market demand.’


How guaranteed is the rental yield?


The company promises a seven per cent yield on the Exeter project and up to nine per cent on others for a period of five years.


But how strong is that promise? The yield is guaranteed by the company only. The firms says it can guarantee the yield because of a ‘robust model’, but many other property developers in the past have said the same thing, especially before the great recession of 2008, and investors found some of those promises fell down when developers went under.


When it comes to any guarantee, you always need to evaluate what is backing it and quite how strong that pledge subsequently is.


For example, this is not a guarantee like those on other financial products. Regulated financial products, like savings accounts, are covered up to the value of £85,000 by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the event the provider goes out of business.


Nor is it up there with those judged to be the strongest of guarantees, such as the return on government bonds – gilts – which are backed by the state and will only fall away if the UK defaults on its debt.


The Vita guarantee relies on the company remaining solvent. If troubles did arise, the investor would still own the property, but then finding new tenants would become their responsibility and they may find rents on the open market are lower and do not deliver the returns promised here.


Many investors were caught out by this in the past, especially those who bought into new-build buy-to-let flats before the property crash.


Potential investors should always look into the finances of a company offering any deal before taking the plunge and make their own decision on how guaranteed a guarantee is.


What happens after five years?


The guaranteed yield ends after 5 years. From then on you will get whatever is left from the rent, which Vita sets, after the company has taken its service charge.


On a property worth £89,000 in Exeter, the annual management and service charge is £2,698 – more than three per cent of the purchase price.


This is important to bear in mind if you plan to sell after five years. Whoever you want to sell to will have to sign up to this arrangement, agreeing to give up a large chunk of their rental income in the process.


What do investors have to pay out?


- There is a small reservation fee to secure the property – this fee is deducted from the total cost.


- You pay a 25 per cent deposit within approximately 30 days of reservation.


- You pay a further 25 per cent payment approximately half-way through build.


- You pay a final payment on completion of the development.


What Vita offers students and why it reckons Exeter is worth buying


Exeter has recently experienced a huge growth in student numbers which has led to a major shortage of suitable accommodation, Vita Student says.


Students living at Portland House will benefit from fitted kitchens, en-suite bathrooms and a space-saving foldable double bed with integrated sofa.


The apartments also include free high-speed 100MB broadband, wi-fi and flat screen smart TVs as well as access to communal areas such as a study hub and leisure facilities – a far cry from the dingy vision that student accommodation typically brings.


Student numbers in Exeter have swelled to 19,000. This growth can be attributed to the university rising rapidly in the UK league tables culminating in it being named as The Sunday Times University of the Year in 2013.


The properties are all managed by Vita Student through a specialist management arm. This, it says, helps reduce costs for investors and gives students the best possible experience.


It adds that the minimum yield of seven per cent for five years on the Exeter project that it offers investors can be guaranteed because it is based on an extremely ‘robust model.’


Vita Student was founded in 2012 by luxury developer Vita Ventures which has been acquiring land at Russell Group university cities across the UK.


Vita Ventures was founded by the UK’s largest seller of overseas investment property, Select Property, together with luxury homes developer, Huntsmere, combining the expertise of both.


There are several other cities in the pipeline and it is specifically targeted Russell Group university cities such as Edinburgh, Cardiff, Southampton, Nottingham and Sheffield for its next projects.



WE LOST MONEY IN THE PROPERTY CRASH BUT INVESTING IN STUDENT HOMES STILL LOOKED ATTRACTIVE



Bhavesh Chande, an Independent financial adviser and his brother Chetan, a doctor, are both based in Greater Manchester and have been investing in buy-to-let and off-plan property in the UK and abroad for many years. In 2013 they wanted a new investment and choose Vita Student’s 279 unit project in First Street, Manchester, in February 2013.


When Bhavesh and Chetan came across the project, the business was offering investors the opportunity to buy fully-managed studio apartments from £77,950, with an assured rental yield of nine per cent for two years.


Bhavesh and Chetan quickly decided to buy two properties on the top floor of the building.


Bhavesh explains: ‘We’ve been investing in different buy-to-let projects in the UK and abroad together for years so we were really surprised when we found such an ideal investment opportunity so close to home here in Manchester. 


‘We had lost some money abroad during the property crash in 2008 so in 2013 we were more cautious about where we were investing and the First Street development seemed to fit the bill perfectly. Even though it is an off-plan scheme the completion date is next year which keeps the risk to a minimum.


‘As an IFA I know what to look for when it comes to investments so we did a lot of research into the student property market and were amazed at the returns it can generate.


‘The guaranteed yield for the first two years is an added bonus and really gives us peace of mind that we’re making a sensible investment.


‘My brother and I both went to Manchester University so we know the area well and we have no doubt as to whether the development will be popular with students. We’re confident that the location and quality of the finish means that filling our studios will be no problem.


‘Our two new apartments are certainly a world away from the shoebox student rooms I stayed in during university.


‘We’re looking forward to seeing the project completed next year and seeing our returns. If all goes well then we’ll definitely be building a Vita Student portfolio with apartments all over the UK.’






Be cautious when buying off-plan


Buying a property before it’s even been built requires faith. But more and more of us are doing it.
Estate agency Savills reports that 80 per cent of its new-build sales are now ‘off-plan’.



DO YOUR RESEARCH: OTHER VITA STUDENT OFFERINGS



- The Chapel in Liverpool: Launched in March 2012, sold out by June 2012. 67 studio apartments. Ready for 2013/14 academic year.


- Tinlings in Liverpool: Launched in June 2012, sold out by November 2012. 132 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- Crosshall in Liverpool: Launched in December 2012, currently 95 per cent sold out. 158 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- First Street in Manchester: Launched in late February 2013, sold out by July 2013. 279 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- Colston Avenue in Bristol: Launched July 2013, sold out by early September 2013. 132 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- Portland House in Exeter: Launched in September 2013, currently 55 per cent sold out. 161 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.




And Robert Fraser, of London estate agency Fraser & Co, says: ‘Some people had their fingers burnt buying off-plan during the downturn.


‘But if you’re confident in the developer, scheme, location and local market, it can be a great way to buy.’


It pays to be cautious. After the credit crunch, some people who’d bought apartments off-plan found the value had fallen by up to 35 per cent when they came to complete.


Kate Faulkner, at advice site propertychecklists.co.uk, says: ‘If you are buying off-plan in a rising market, you could get a bargain. If you agreed a price for, say, £150,000 and two years later it’s worth £160,000 or more, you’d be happy.’


But buyers should ensure the developer is reputable and have insurance so that if they go bust, you will get back your deposit.


Use an independent lawyer to check the paperwork.


Find out when the rest of the development will be finished, otherwise you risk living in a building site for the first few years – This is Money has listed current Vita Student offerings and planned finished dates to the right.


Under the Consumer Code for Home Builders, you have the right to withdraw from a purchase and receive a full refund if the completion date is unreasonably delayed by more than six months.








Money | Mail Online



Are posh university flats promising investors 7% income worth a look?

Saturday, September 21, 2013

Charts: Income Growth Has Stalled for Most Americans

Yesterday the Census Bureau released its latest income data, confirming what millions of Americans already know: The recession may be over, but the recovery has yet to trickle down. Specifically, the Census reported that median household incomes didn’t budge between 2011 and 2012.


Digging deeper into the new data reveals more evidence of the widening income gap between the rich and the rest. 


The only bright side of stalled incomes is that they are no longer experiencing the steep decline that started in 2007 before the recession hit. But that’s hardly cause for celebration: At $ 51,017, the real median household income in 2012 is even less than it was at the end of the ’80s, and it’s down 9 percent from its high in 1999.





This loss of real income hasn’t affected all Americans equally. For the top 20 percent of earners, average incomes grew 70 percent since 1967, and they grew 88 percent for the top 5 percent. Meanwhile, middle-income households have seen their earnings grow just 20 percent in the past four decades.     



This translates into a greater share of total income going to top earners. In 2012, the top 20 percent took in more than half of all income in the United States, according to the Census.



To put that into sharper focus, I’ve charted how each percentile’s share of total income has changed since the late ’60s. After experiencing significant growth in the mid-1970s, the bottom 20 percent of earners have seen their share steadily drop. Compare that with the top 5 and 20 percent, which have seen their piece of the pie expand in the past two decades while all other Americans’ shrunk.



This trend is also seen in the latest income data complied by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, which shows that the top 10 percent of earners now hold their largest share of total income since the eve of the Depression.



The new Census data on the bleak state of the American Dream came one day after Forbes released its latest list of 400 wealthiest Americans. Together, they are worth more than $ 2 trillion. The past year has been very good to them:


The average net worth of list members is a staggering $ 5 billion, $ 800 million more than a year ago and also a record. The minimum net worth needed to make the 400 list was $ 1.3 billion. The last time it was that high was in 2007 and 2008, before property and stock market values began sliding. Because the bar is so high, 61 American billionaires didn’t make the cut.



As Piketty and Saez report, 95 percent of all income growth between 2009 and 2012 went to the 1 percent.


Sources: Chart 1: Census Bureau, “Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2012″ (PDF); charts 2-4: Census Bureau historical income data; chart 5: Emmanuel Saez, UC Berkeley (Excel)


Front page image: rangizzz/Shutterstock



Politics | Mother Jones



Charts: Income Growth Has Stalled for Most Americans

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Income Inequality Takes Manhattan—in 3-D!

It’s no surprise that income inequality in America is on the rise. Eighty percent of Americans have seen their incomes stagnate or fall since 1979. Meanwhile, the top 1 percent of earners is taking in more than ever before. We’ve made numerous charts to illustrate these disparities. But what if you could actually see the split between the superwealthy and everyone else?


Artist and researcher Nickolay Lamm‘s images of income in New York do just that. Using 2012 data from the mapping site ArcGIS, Lamm superimposed 3-D bars over photos of the cityscape to show the median net worth of census block groups. For example, “if one section had a net worth of $ 500,000, the height of the 3-D bar shape for that section was 5 cm. If one section had a net worth of $ 112,000, the height for that section was 1.12 cm.” The resulting images clearly illustrate New York’s status as one of the cities with the highest levels of income inequality.


Below, you can interact with the cityscape and the 3-D images for various neighborhoods.



Central Park. The Upper West Side is on the left.


 



The Financial District and the southern tip of Manhattan. (Note: Statue of Liberty has been added.)


 



Harlem


 



Looking south over Manhattan from Englewood, New Jersey. Washington Heights is on the left. Central Park and Midtown are in the distance.


 



Midtown near the Trump Tower.


 



Above Brooklyn. The Financial District is on the left. Midtown is on the right.


 



Looking south toward the Upper West Side.


 



Above Central Park. The Upper East Side is on the left.


 



Above Yankee Stadium in the Bronx.



Political Mojo | Mother Jones



Income Inequality Takes Manhattan—in 3-D!