Showing posts with label Strike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Strike. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Strange Features Found in the Naudet Brothers First Strike Footage

Saturday, March 29, 2014

N.Y. lawmakers, Governor Cuomo, strike budget deal before Monday vote



Sat Mar 29, 2014 4:44pm EDT



New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo smiles as he pauses during his fourth State of the State address from the New York State Capitol in Albany, New York, January 8, 2014 file photo. REUTERS/Mike Segar

New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo smiles as he pauses during his fourth State of the State address from the New York State Capitol in Albany, New York, January 8, 2014 file photo.


Credit: Reuters/Mike Segar




(Reuters) – Before a planned vote on Monday, New York legislators and Governor Andrew Cuomo reached a deal on the state’s 2014-2015 budget after several weeks of negotiating behind closed doors, according to state officials on Saturday.


The budget keeps growth in all funds spending below 2 percent at $ 137.9 billion and provides funding for statewide pre-kindergarten programs. It also cuts business taxes and introduces property tax relief for homeowners, Governor Cuomo said on Saturday.


The agreement comes after budget bills were printed late on Friday night, allowing lawmakers to vote on the plan on Monday, the last day of the state’s financial year. If passed, the budget would be Cuomo’s fourth on-time budget in a row.


“It has to be passed, and we don’t want to get ahead of ourselves, but it was a good piece of work,” Cuomo told reporters on a conference call.


The new budget earmarks $ 1.5 billion in property tax relief for homeowners. It also includes an increase of more than 5 percent in school aid, $ 300 million of which will go to pre-kindergarten in New York City and provides new protections for charter schools.


Lawmakers rejected New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio’s request for a tax hike on the city’s wealthy to help fund classes for preschoolers and pay for after-school programs.


The budget looks to cut taxes and create jobs by establishing a 20 percent real estate property tax credit for manufacturers who own or lease property. And, beginning in 2014, it will slash the tax rate on income for all manufacturers from the current 5.9 percent to zero.


Through budget initiatives, tougher bribery and anti-corruption laws will be implemented, and about $ 162 million will go to New York’s Environmental Protection Fund, an increase of $ 9 million over the previous budget.


Also, young people and new drivers will face stricter laws governing texting while driving. Licenses will be suspended for 120 days for first-time offenders, and a year’s suspension will be imposed for those convicted twice.


At the same time, New York State’s budget will fund a Commission on Youth, Public Safety and Justice. The commission will be entrusted to develop recommendations on ways to help raise the age at which juveniles are tried.


New York is one of only two states that prosecute 16- and 17-year olds through the adult criminal justice system.


(Reporting By Theopolis Waters in Chicago and Edward Krudy in New York; editing by Gunna Dickson)






Reuters: Politics



N.Y. lawmakers, Governor Cuomo, strike budget deal before Monday vote

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Netanyahu Orders Israel Army To Prepare For Possible Military Strike Against Iran In 2014

Netanyahu Orders Israel Army To Prepare For Possible Military Strike Against Iran In 2014
http://www.infowars.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-print/images/printer_famfamfam.gif


zerohedge.com
March 19, 2014


Back in 2013 it was Syria where the world was gearing for imminent military action after a relentless series of false flag provocations by the United States (intent on securing a Qatar gas pipeline to Europe) which in the last minute was deftly diffused by Vladimir Putin. In 2014, it was the Ukraine’s turn, and after a prolonged campaign orchestrated by Victoria Nuland and the US State Department (again) which succeeded in the now traditional violent coup (see Egypt and Libya), once again saw Putin victorious, after yesterday’s annexation of the all important Crimean peninsula, achieved without the firing of one shot. So now that Putin has succeeded in trouncing the US twice in a row, it is time to poke some old, well-known geopolitical wounds, such as Iran. And who better to do it than Israel, where as Haaretz reports,Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon have ordered the army to continue preparing for a possible military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities at a cost of at least 10 billion shekels ($ 2.89 billion) this year, despite the talks between Iran and the West, according to recent statements by senior military officers.”


To be sure there is a tangible benefit for all those involved: more war means more military spending means more “broken windows” means more “GDP.”


Three Knesset members who were present at Knesset joint committee hearings on Israel Defense Forces plans that were held in January and February say they learned during the hearings that 10 billion shekels to 12 billion shekels of the defense budget would be allocated this year for preparations for a strike on Iran, approximately the same amount that was allocated in 2013.



Yet unlike the US where warmongering has become an art, if not a science, in Israel these things are taken far more seriously:


The IDF representatives said the army had received a clear directive from government officials from the political echelon – meaning Netanyahu and Ya’alon – to continue readying for a possible independent strike by Israel on the Iranian nuclear sites, regardless of the talks now happening between Iran and the West, the three MKs said.



As for the diplomatic cover for a potential attack, it is well-known, and the same one used for the past 3 years – attack Iran before it can nuke Israel and obliterate it from the face of the earth.


Ever since the interim accord between Iran and the six powers was reached, Netanyahu has stressed that Israel will not consider itself bound by it. In the last few weeks, as talks on a permanent accord have resumed, Netanyahu has upped his rhetoric on the Iranian issue, and is again making implied threats about a possible unilateral Israeli strike on the Iranian nuclear sites.


“My friends, I believe that letting Iran enrich uranium would open up the floodgates,” Netanyahu said at the AIPAC conference earlier this month. “That must not happen. And we will make sure it does not happen.”



Ironically, this time Israel may see pushback from none other than the US itself, which mysteriously over the past 6 months has transformed itself from Iran’s most hated enemy to a willing partner who sees Iran as nothing short of a frontier market (not to mention source of natural resources).


However, the US too realizes that it needs “military outs” with Ukraine seemingly diffused for the time being. Which is why yesterday, a few hours after Russia peacefully annexed Crimea, the US made its feeble response known, when it suspended operations of the Syrian Embassy in Washington and its consulates and told diplomats and staff who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents to leave the country. The justification of this oddly timed move came from the U.S. special envoy for Syria Daniel Rubinstein who said that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had refused to step down and was responsible for atrocities against Syrians.


And this was news to the US? More from Reuters:


“We have determined it is unacceptable for individuals appointed by that regime to conduct diplomatic or consular operations in the United States,” said Rubinstein, whose appointment was announced by the State Department on Monday.


“Consequently, the United States notified the Syrian government today that it must immediately suspend operations of its embassy in Washington, D.C., and its honorary consulates in Troy, Michigan, and Houston, Texas,” he said in a statement.



In other words, the US tried to impose its “moral superiority” codex on yet another country, which for all intents and purposes was a proxy of Russian strength in the middle east, i.e., punish the Kremlin by kicking out Syria. Surely Putin was in tears.


The only problem is that it is now beyond obvious to virtually everyone in the world that the framework of Pax Americana is only applicable to the increasingly self-deluded United States, and of course the Group of 7 most insolvent nations, whose debt ponzi schemes are ever more reliant on a centrally planned regime of low interest rates and free money. For everyone else it is now just as obvious that when provoked, the best the US can do is simply impose some sanctions, and shut down embassies… while it prints trillions of dollars in “paper wealth” each year of course.


This article was posted: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 at 2:12 pm









Infowars




Read more about Netanyahu Orders Israel Army To Prepare For Possible Military Strike Against Iran In 2014 and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Thursday, March 6, 2014

Five Afghan soldiers killed in air strike by NATO-led force





Five Afghan soldiers were killed on Thursday in an air strike by the NATO-led force in Afghanistan‘s eastern province of Logar, Afghan officials and the coalition said.


Coalition airstrikes on friendly targets have helped widen a rift between Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the United States, cementing his resolve not to sign a bilateral security deal to let US troops remain in the country after 2014.


“We condemn the attack on the Afghan National Army in Logar,” said Aimal Faizi, a spokesman for Karzai. “The president has ordered an investigation.”


The airstrike, at around 3:30 a.m., seriously wounded at least eight other soldiers, said district governor Khalilullah Kamal.


“Right now a discussion in the province is going on between Afghan officials and foreign forces to find out the reason for this attack,” he said, describing the attack as having targeted a new outpost of the Afghan army.


A total of 17 people had been injured, his office said.


Coalition forces said the bombing was an accident.


“We value the strong relationship with our Afghan partners, and we will determine what actions will be taken to ensure incidents like this do not happen again,” they said in a statement.


“Dead bodies and wounded personnel have been transferred to Kabul,” the ministry of defense said in a statement, adding that a delegation had been sent to investigate.


(Reporting by Mirwais Harooni in Kabul and Samihullah Paiwand in Gardez; Writing by Jessica Donati; Editing by Clarence Fernandez)


http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/afghanistan/140306/five-afghan-soldiers-killed-air-strike-nato-le




GlobalPost – Home



Five Afghan soldiers killed in air strike by NATO-led force

Thursday, February 13, 2014

U.S. Al Qaeda Suspect Facing Drone Strike Is in Pakistan


Jim Miklaszewski, Alexander Smith and Robert Windrem
nbcnews.com
Febraru 11, 2014


The Obama administration is mulling whether use a drone strike to kill at least one U.S. citizen in Pakistan, senior U.S. officials said Tuesday.


Reports that CIA drones were watching an American member of al Qaeda allegedly planning terrorist attacks were first published by The Associated Press on Monday. But the press agency did not say the country in which the target was located.


Speaking to NBC News on Tuesday, the officials would not give any details of the target but said it was in a tribal region of western Pakistan.


They said the White House has not yet given the order to launch.

Read more


This article was posted: Tuesday, February 11, 2014 at 1:46 pm









Infowars



U.S. Al Qaeda Suspect Facing Drone Strike Is in Pakistan

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Obama admin weighing another drone strike on U.S. citizen accused of terrorism


By End the Lie


President Barack Obama speaking in 2012 (Image credit: Daniel Borman/Flickr)

President Barack Obama speaking in 2012 (Image credit: Daniel Borman/Flickr)



Obama administration officials revealed that they are considering a drone strike on a U.S. citizen who they say is a member of al-Qaida and actively planning attacks on Americans abroad.


Read our latest: “Security researcher: Sochi hacking story was ’100% fraudulent,’ NBC defends report” and “Plane forced to land after Ukrainian hijacker attempts to divert jet to Sochi


In May of last year, Attorney General Eric Holder publicly confirmed that U.S. drone strikes have killed four American citizens in Yemen in Pakistan without charge or trial.


In the same month, Obama announced new restrictions on drone strikes, which some say may be breached in this case.


While the Obama administration’s policy is that only the military can kill Americans overseas who are suspected terrorists, officials said the president could buck those guidelines and allow the CIA to use a drone strike, according to the National Journal.


The Associated Press cited four unnamed U.S. officials who said that the suspected terrorist is currently in a national that refuses to allow U.S. military operations on their soil. The country also reportedly is unable to pursue the unidentified American citizen.


Two of the officials said the man is an al-Qaeda facilitator who is directly responsible for deadly attacks on American citizens overseas.


The man also “continues to plan attacks against them that would use improvised explosive devices,” according to the two officials cited by AP.


Yet another U.S. official said that the Department of Defense is not yet settled on if the man is actually dangerous enough “to merit the potential domestic fallout of killing an American without charging him with a crime or trying him.”


Another concern would be the significant international issues that could arise if an operation was carried out in a country that will not allow U.S. military action on their territory.


A different U.S. official told the AP that the Pentagon already decided to recommend killing the man.


The suspected terrorist is reportedly in a well-guarded, remote location. Any attempt to capture him using U.S. troops without the approval of the local government “would be risky and even more politically explosive than a U.S. missile strike,” the AP reports, citing military officials.


An unnamed senior administration official said that the Department of justice is currently building a case for the president to review and decide if the strike will be carried out.


The procedure is the same as the one followed when the U.S. killed Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen in 2011. Al-Awlaki was a well-known militant cleric and U.S. citizen.


The Justice Department has to build a case showing that the killing of the American is “legal and constitutional.” The administration has to show that the Pentagon can take action against the citizen as an enemy combatant under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force.


Under the new Obama administration guidelines, they must show that the target poses “continuing, imminent threat to U.S. persons.” Lethal force can only be used “o prevent or stop attacks against U.S. persons, and even then, only when capture is not feasible and no other reasonable alternatives exist to address the threat effectively.”


The AP, as per the government’s request, withheld the name of the country because U.S. officials said it could “interrupt ongoing counterterror operations.”


The Pentagon, CIA and Justice Department all declined to comment for the AP.


We would love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email us at [email protected]


Please support alternative news and help us start paying contributors by donating, doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.





End the Lie – Independent News



Obama admin weighing another drone strike on U.S. citizen accused of terrorism

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Napolitano: President Can"t Order Drone Strike on American Under Constitution

President Barack Obama does not have the constitutional authority to order a drone strike on an American who officials claim was fighting with al-Qaida and plotting terrorist attacks against the U.S., former Judge Andrew Napolitano said Tuesday.

Obama “does not have war powers to kill an American . . . There are two clauses in the Constitution that specifically protect Americans,” Napolitano, a former New Jersey Superior Court judge, told “Fox & Friends.”


Napolitano said it was “defined as treason” if an American was waging war on the U.S. Under that circumstance, he said American citizens were guaranteed a jury trial and could not be convicted “unless there were two witnesses to the same overt act.”


Officials admitted Monday a U.S. citizen was suspected of actively planning to attack Americans overseas. Officials within the Obama administration stated they had been debating whether to kill him under a new drone strike policy.


The new drone policy stipulates targeted killings must be in an ongoing military conflict, the target must have taken up arms against the U.S., there must be no possibility of arresting the suspect, and the decision must be made by senior political leaders.


Napolitano said the drone policy was written by the president and, therefore, was not U.S. law. He said only the Constitution allowed Congress to write laws.


“Only the Congress can enact a law, especially a law giving the president authority to kill an American,” Napolitano said. “The president’s efforts to bypass the Constitution . . . in foreign affairs is just as unconstitutional as its efforts to bypass the Constitution in domestic affairs.”


The law allowed an American suspected of terrorism against the U.S. to be kidnapped, arrested, or put on trial, Napolitano said. However, to target a drone strike on an individual suspected of terrorism was “an insufficient basis to execute him without a trial.”


Napolitano argued that even if Congress authorized the action against the American suspect, “it would still be against the constitutional protections that he’s afforded.”


Related Stories:


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Napolitano: President Can"t Order Drone Strike on American Under Constitution

Monday, February 10, 2014

In Illinois Prison, A Hunger Strike Against ‘Inhumanity’

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


In Illinois Prison, A Hunger Strike Against ‘Inhumanity’

Sunday, January 26, 2014

Iraqi planes, artillery strike rebel-held Falluja

BAGHDAD (Reuters) – Iraqi government forces battling al Qaeda-linked militants intensified air strikes and artillery fire on the rebel-held city of Falluja on Sunday, and at least seven people were killed, according to hospital officials and tribal leaders.






Reuters: Top News



Iraqi planes, artillery strike rebel-held Falluja

Thursday, January 16, 2014

McConnell"s pre-emptive EPA strike

Mitch McConnell is pictured. | AP Photo

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell argues that he has the Clean Air Act on his side. | AP Photo





Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell moved Thursday to force a Senate vote on one of the prime regulations in President Barack Obama’s climate plan, a move that would force vulnerable Democrats to take a public stance on the controversial rule heading into the midterm elections.


McConnell is launching his attack as a disapproval resolution under the Congressional Review Act, a seldom-invoked law that allows the Senate to repeal a regulation with a simple majority vote.







Obama would certainly veto the resolution if it passes, and Republicans wouldn’t have the votes to override him. But in the meantime, Democrats facing tight reelection fights would have to vote for or against the Environmental Protection Agency’s attempt to throttle greenhouse gas emission from future coal-burning power plants. Some of those Democrats have already been trying to distance themselves from Obama’s environmental agenda and the troubled rollout of his health care plan.


(PHOTOS: Climate skeptics in Congress)


“So the majority leader and his Democratic caucus now have a choice,” McConnell said. “Are they going to stand with the coal families under attack in places like Kentucky and West Virginia and Colorado, or are they going to continue to stand with the powerful left-wing special interests that want to see their jobs completely eliminated.”


Republican challenges to EPA rules under the CRA have failed to secure majority support in the Senate in recent years, and this is the first time a senator has filed such challenge to a rule that hasn’t become final yet. EPA isn’t scheduled to put out a final rule on the coal plants until September — it published the regulation in the Federal Register only last week.


“Mitch McConnell has made a sport out of abusing Senate rules, and now he’s just inventing new ones as it suits him,” said Melinda Pierce, the Sierra Club’s deputy legislative director. “That’s not how lawmaking works.


“McConnell’s political maneuver is like asking for instant replay before the football is even snapped,” she added.


(QUIZ: How well do you know Mitch McConnell?)


But McConnell argues that he has the Clean Air Act on his side.


He sent a letter Thursday to Comptroller General Gene Dodaro laying out his argument that he should be act now because EPA proposed the regulation “under a very unusual provision” of the Clean Air Act. The provision, McConnell argues, means that any power plant whose construction has begun after the regulation is published is already subject to the rule.


“Thus, the proposed GHG rule immediately changes the legal landscape for anyone seeking to develop a fossil fuel power plant,” McConnell wrote. The proposal would also “have enormous economic and practical ramifications,” he added.


McConnell’s CRA challenge is co-sponsored by 40 fellow Senate Republicans.


The National Association of Manufacturers applauded the move, saying the administration has been working on the power plant rule for almost two years despite industry pleas that the technology for capturing and storing carbon emissions isn’t ready to be deployed in power plants.


(PHOTOS: Mitch McConnell’s career)


”It is unfortunate that it has come to this, but manufacturers are glad to see that Sen. McConnell is not backing down,” the group said.


McConnell’s maneuver was the second novel attack in two days against the EPA rule — showing that Obama’s critics aren’t going to let his climate policies go through without a fight. On Wednesday, the state of Nebraska filed a suit in federal district court seeking to block the proposed regulation, a departure from the usual strategy of filing such challenges in appellate court after a rule has become final.


On the Senate floor Thursday, McConnell said the administration’s intent was to block new coal plants and kill coal-related jobs. “The Obama administration appears to be sending signals that its latest regulation is actually just the beginning in a new expanded front in its war on coal,” he said.


Obama has made it clear that the EPA rule on future power plants is just the beginning. Later this year, EPA plans propose the first-ever regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants. That would be a far greater hit on the coal industry, whose plants make up about 40 percent of the nation’s greenhouse gas output.


The regulations, which amount to one of the most wide-reaching efforts to tackle greenhouse gas emissions in U.S. history, are certain to face legal challenges that could add years to the timeline.


McConnell’s move comes as the leading Democratic challenger for his seat – Kentucky Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes – is hosting an event late Thursday afternoon to “share her vision” for coal-rich eastern Kentucky.


The GOP leader’s announcement of the challenge also came on the same day that EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy and other administration officials defended Obama’s climate strategy as urgent and justified during a hearing of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.


McCarthy touted estimates that 97 percent of climate scientists think “that human-caused climate change is occurring,” and said her agency plays a “critical role” in cutting carbon pollution.


“The president believes that we have a moral obligation to our children to do what we can to reduce carbon pollution for the sake of their future,” added Nancy Sutley, the outgoing chairwoman of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.


Erica Martinson contributed to this report.




POLITICO – TOP Stories



McConnell"s pre-emptive EPA strike

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Why China Wants to ‘Strike the Mountain’ and ‘Kill the Chicken’

Why China Wants to ‘Strike the Mountain’ and ‘Kill the Chicken’
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif



Understanding two critical strategies for Beijing, one internal and one external.





By for The Diplomat






Chinese leaders are engaging in a dual strategy of “strike the mountain to shock the tiger” and “kill the chicken to scare the monkey.” The first strategy is an internal approach designed to take down a few powerful leaders to scare the lesser ones. The second strategy is an external approach in which leaders go after lesser powers to diminish the role or prevent the involvement of a greater power.


The internal strategy aims to remove formidable leaders who previously headed powerful institutions in key segments of the Chinese system, namely the state security apparatus, the military establishment, and the oil sector. These leaders pursued their own agendas and jockeyed for power at the highest levels before, during, and after the current leadership’s transition period that occurred nearly two years prior. The external strategy concerns the United States, the greater power, as well as Japan, the Philippines, and to a lesser extent, Vietnam, collectively referred to as the lesser powers. These observations lead to some salient questions. What are the major internal and external drivers of these ongoing strategies? Why are Chinese leaders pursuing these two strategies? And what is their overall intent?


What Are the Main Drivers of the Strategies?


The prime drivers of the leadership’s strategies consist of two internal factors and one external factor. The internal factors are best explained by the “crisis theory.” This means the leadership is attempting to manage domestic crises that pose challenges to the current leadership’s new authority and threaten the stability of the state. Presently, crises are unfolding in the economic arena, and, to a lesser extent now, the political arena. The external driver comprises ongoing structural changes occurring in the regional architecture and the security domain in particular; this regional transformation is driven in large part by the U.S. leadership. Both the internal and external factors have push-pull effects; meaning, China’s internal situation shapes its external policies and actions and, at the same time, the external situations feedback into China’s domestic system and affect the internal situation.


In the economic arena, the leaders are dealing with slowing economic growth. According to Charlene Chu, Senior Director of Fitch Ratings China, and a recent report produced by Fitch Ratings on Chinese Banks, “a key macro financial concern since the global financial crisis of 2008 has been the inability of China’s economic growth to get any lasting traction without considerable credit extension.” What’s more, “credit/GDP will have risen an estimated 87 percentage points in the five years ending in 2013, nearly twice that observed in other countries prior to financial sector stress.” The concerns “relate less to the level of credit/GDP – figures in the region of 200 percent are not unheard of in Asia or developed markets – and more to the very rapid rise in such a short time.”


The leadership however might be competent in managing a vast economy on the verge of a gradual economic slowdown by introducing policies to continue extending substantial credit and to liberalize capital controls in order to boost domestic consumption, for example. But these policies hold obvious risks. Extending more credit accelerates the rapid rise of credit/GDP levels in a short time, while lifting capital controls might make China vulnerable to capital flight. More crucially, the leaders are facing a potential crisis unfolding in the banking and finance sector and, as Chu has pointed out elsewhere, in the shadow banking system in particular. In this case, the leadership might be less capable of managing a sudden collapse of a major banking institution or of shadow banking institutions and the residual effects from such unexpected failures, such as social instability.


For the Chinese leadership, an economic slowdown or a banking and finance crisis, or some combination thereof, is dangerous on many levels. Conventional wisdom suggests the leaders predicate the Party’s legitimacy on economic development and growth, so a major economic setback or sudden crisis might undermine the new Party leadership’s authority. More importantly, however, is the unconventional wisdom. Every leadership since the 14th Party Congress perceives that economic weakness might make the state vulnerable to foreign influence and manipulation. Chinese history is replete with negative examples of how a debilitated Chinese economy made China more susceptible to foreign forces and resulted in considerable adverse consequences for the state and society. And when the CPC established the PRC in 1949 it staked its reputation on strengthening China against foreign influences and control as well as maintaining national sovereignty. For these reasons China’s economic reforms – in the banking and finance sector in particular – have entered a complex phase for the party, the state, and society.


Current economic reforms are made more complex because of the ongoing but seemingly diminishing complications in the political arena resulting from what appears to be the final stages of China’s leadership transition. Contrary to popular opinion that the current leadership has consolidated power rapidly, the leaders are still untangling and addressing an intricate internal faction. This faction consisted of influential individuals who occupied, and in some cases still occupy, powerful positions in major institutions, namely the state security apparatus, the state oil sector, and the military establishment. The matter is convoluted because the institutions are tightly connected: the security apparatus is connected to the military establishment; and the military establishment and the state oil industries have been closely linked in large part due to the Sino-Soviet split in the 1960s that resulted in oil shortages and imperiled China’s military. Because of this reality, unraveling the faction in its entirety and removing each and every player are unachievable objectives.




The Diplomat




Read more about Why China Wants to ‘Strike the Mountain’ and ‘Kill the Chicken’ and other interesting subjects concerning Asia at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Alert: UN Sealed Evidence Could Be Used To Strike Syria -- Episode 228

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Alert: UN Sealed Evidence Could Be Used To Strike Syria -- Episode 228

Friday, December 6, 2013

Obamacare "Strike Team" Member: People Losing Their Plans Is a "Good Thing"

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Obamacare "Strike Team" Member: People Losing Their Plans Is a "Good Thing"

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Alert: UN Sealed Evidence Could Be Used To Strike Syria -- Episode 228

Alert: UN Sealed Evidence Could Be Used To Strike Syria -- Episode 228
http://img.youtube.com/vi/e7eY-H33U8s/0.jpg



Get economic collapse news throughout the day visit http://x22report.com More news http://thepeoplesnewz.com Germany’s telecom giant is feeling the effects o…




Read more about Alert: UN Sealed Evidence Could Be Used To Strike Syria -- Episode 228 and other interesting subjects concerning Top News Videos at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Charts: Why Fast-Food Workers Are Going on Strike



This Thursday, fast-food workers in more than 100 cities are planning a one-day strike to demand a “livable” wage of $ 15 an hour. They have a point: The lowest-paid Americans are struggling to keep up with the cost of living—and they have seen none of the gains experienced by the country’s top earners. While average incomes of the top 1 percent grew more than 270 percent since 1960, those of the bottom 90 percent grew 22 percent. And the real value of the minimum wage barely budged, increasing a total of 7 percent over those decades.


More of the numbers behind the strike and the renewed calls to raise the minimum wage:


Median hourly wage for fast-food workers nationwide:
$ 8.94/hour


Increase in real median wages for food service workers since 1999:
$ 0.10/hour


Last time the federal minimum wage exceeded $ 8.94/hour (in 2012 dollars):
1968


Change in the real value of the minimum wage since 1968:
-22%



Median age of fast-food workers:
29


Median age of female fast-food workers:
32


Percentage of fast-food workers who are women:
65%


Percentage of fast-food workers older than 20 who have kids:
36%


Income of someone earning $ 8.94/hour:
$ 18,595/year


Federal poverty line for a family of three:
$ 17,916/year


Income of someone earning $ 15/hour:
$ 31,200/year


Income needed for a “secure yet modest” living for a family with two adults and one child…
In the New York City area: $ 77,378/year
In rural Mississippi: $ 47,154/year


Growth in average real income of the top 1 percent since 1960:
271%


What the current minimum wage would be if it had grown at the same rate as top incomes:
More than $ 25



How would you and your family fare on a typical fast-food paycheck? How much does it really take to make ends meet in your city or state? Use this calculator to get a better sense of what fast-food workers are up against.







$  





Politics | Mother Jones



Charts: Why Fast-Food Workers Are Going on Strike

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Drone Strike Kills 4 In Pakistan


The US military continues to kill Pakistani civilians despite hostilities. Source: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/pakistan-officials-missiles-us-drone-kills-3-susp…



Drone Strike Kills 4 In Pakistan

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

UPDATE 1-Illinois legislative leaders strike deal on pensions

UPDATE 1-Illinois legislative leaders strike deal on pensions
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/0ec87__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif




Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:32pm EST



CHICAGO Nov 27 (Reuters) – Illinois’ legislative leaders on Wednesday reached a long-elusive deal to reform the state’s woefully underfunded public pensions and are now moving to win the support of their members, their spokespeople said.


Details were not immediately available.


“The four leaders have reached an agreement on comprehensive pension reform that they will present to their caucuses,” said Patty Schuh, spokeswoman for Senate Republican leader Christine Radogno, adding that the final language of the plan was being drafted.


The Democrat-controlled Senate will join the Democrat-controlled House in holding a session on Tuesday to take up a pension measure, according to Ron Holmes, a spokesman for Senate President John Cullerton. House Speaker Michael Madigan put his chamber’s members on notice on Monday that they will be meeting for a one-day session.


“The Senate president will be debriefing members of his caucus in the coming days in hopes of garnering support,” Holmes said.


Illinois has the worst-funded public employee pension system among the 50 states, with an estimated $ 100 billion unfunded pension liability. Pension costs are squeezing out funding for core services such as education, and Illinois has been punished by credit rating agenices with downgrades that have left it with the lowest credit ratings among U.S. states.


Far-reaching changes to Illinois’ retirement benefits have been a hard sell in the Senate, where many members are wary of violating state constitutional protections for public employee pensions. Labor unions have pushed back against any effort to impose cuts to pension benefits, though they had offered backing to a Senate bill last spring that would have given workers and retirees a choice in how benefits might be cut.


The state’s House and Senate have backed competing proposals, with the House plan taking a more aggressive approach to cost reductions.


Legislative leaders have been seeking ways to boost a projected 30-year savings to $ 150 billion, up from about $ 138 billion eyed by a special legislative panel on pensions created in June.


Negotiations have centered on savings that could be achieved through changes to the current 3 percent compounded cost-of-living adjustments for retirees. One proposal would limit such adjustments to half the annual inflation rate, with some compounding of payment increases.






Reuters: Bonds News




Read more about UPDATE 1-Illinois legislative leaders strike deal on pensions and other interesting subjects concerning Bonds at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Report: More Drone Strike Deaths Since Obama Announced New “Constraint”

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Report: More Drone Strike Deaths Since Obama Announced New “Constraint”

Monday, November 18, 2013

80% of drone strike victims innocent civilians


The majority of people killed by U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan are not militants, according to the country’s Interior Minister. Rehman Malik said 80 per cen…
Video Rating: 4 / 5



80% of drone strike victims innocent civilians

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

HuffPost Live interview with drone strike survivors


Interview by Alyona Minkovski with the Rehman family, whose grandmother was killed in 2012 by a drone strike. Watch the documentary Unmanned: America’s Drone…
Video Rating: 5 / 5



HuffPost Live interview with drone strike survivors