Showing posts with label Either. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Either. Show all posts

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Hey GOP: "Repeal and replace" wont work either

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) (L) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speak at a news conference about the U.S. debt ceiling crisis at the U.S. Capitol in Washington July 30, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst  

Some Republicans think that what the American people want is another massive legislative battle over health care. After a massive debate in 2009, a herculean legislative struggle in 2010, a divisive presidential election in 2012, followed by a national rollout that will take years to implement, the GOP seems to think folks want to do that all over again. In reverse. And then do it again with some new yet undefined GOP plan. Does anyone think the GOP politicians really have that much courage? That the electorate even wants it?

No frickin’ way. Smart Republicans know it.


Republicans had their chance to enact a major health care law when Bush was in power, but they didnt. Had they done so, I seriously doubt Democrats would have had the courage, and opportunity, to do it. But they didn’t and the Democrats did. They only thing they could do is try to stop Obamacare, and they failed. In Congress, at the Supreme Court, and at the ballot box in 2012. Obamacare is now a major part of the body politic and the economy for many years ahead. No serious Republican actually believes there exists the political support for another four years or more of upheaval over yet another health care battle. Make no mistake, Democrats will make it a battle for the ages.


What’s more, what about that beloved “certainty” GOP corporate big shots love so much. They’ve got certainty now because they can see reality: Obamacare isn’t going anywhere and there’s no point in going down the uncertain path of repealing it and replacing it with … something. GOP politicians are lying to their constituents. Eventually their own voters will see that and move on from Obamacare. This battle is over. They lost. They don’t want another war over health care legislation.


GOP politicians have milked repeal for all it’s worth. The market for it is shrinking and they don’t have a new product out there. Repeal is going the way of the BlackBerry.




Daily Kos



Hey GOP: "Repeal and replace" wont work either

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

No Fed Taper But No Market Bubbles Either: Jefferies’ Ward McCarthy

No Fed Taper But No Market Bubbles Either: Jefferies’ Ward McCarthy
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/d7581__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif



It’s Fed day, the day when the Fed issues its latest policy statement! The Fed is expected to leave policy as is, in the wake of questions about the health of the economy and uncertainty surrounding the fiscal fights in Washington.


Related: No Fed Taper This Year: Jim Grant


Ward McCarthy, managing director and chief financial economist of the fixed income division at Jefferies, says it boils down to this: “With fiscal policy that is restrictive, monetary policy needs to continue to be accommodative.”


And while economists in a Bloomberg survey believe a taper will come in March, McCarthy thinks it’s wise to take it meeting by meeting because the decision will be data-dependent and Fed officials “keep telling us it’s not predetermined” — a point many people missed when they expected a pullback in Fed bond buying in September.


Related: Rickards on Fed & Yellen: Here Comes the ‘Helicopter Money


McCarthy says December is a longshot for any change in Fed policy because another fiscal fight is looming. Temporary funding for the government expires in mid-January and the debt ceiling suspension expires on February 7–both deadlines agreed to earlier this month as part of a plan to end the government shutdown.


Related: Fed Taper Could Wait Until December or Later: Neil Irwin


But what are the consequences of the Fed continuing its easing policies? Laurence Fink, CEO of Blackrock, the world’s largest money manager, told a recent panel discussion in Chicago, “it’s imperative that the Fed begins to taper.” He cited “bubble-like markets” as the reason, referring to the huge increase in equity prices and the dramatic narrowing of spreads in corporate debt.


McCarthy disagrees. ” Almost by definition the primary function of QE is to cause markets to perform better than they would without it.” Check out the video to see why he doesn’t call it a bubble.




Yahoo Finance: The Daily Ticker




Read more about No Fed Taper But No Market Bubbles Either: Jefferies’ Ward McCarthy and other interesting subjects concerning Commentary at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Savior or slayer? Either way, Nokia"s Elop a contender for Microsoft chief


Former Nokia CEO Stephen Elop speaks during the news conference of the Finnish mobile phone manufacturer Nokia in Espoo, September 3, 2013. REUTERS/Markku Ulander/Lehtikuva

Former Nokia CEO Stephen Elop speaks during the news conference of the Finnish mobile phone manufacturer Nokia in Espoo, September 3, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Markku Ulander/Lehtikuva






SEATTLE/HELSINKI | Wed Sep 4, 2013 12:02am EDT



SEATTLE/HELSINKI (Reuters) – When a British bookmaker installed Stephen Elop as favorite to take over the soon-to-be-vacant CEO slot at Microsoft Corp last week, most tech observers laughed it off as a publicity stunt.


But Microsoft’s purchase of Nokia’s handset business, announced late on Monday, has suddenly made Elop one of the most visible candidates for the top spot at the company where he once worked.


Investors and others familiar with the board’s thinking reject any suggestion that the deal was done with Elop in mind, and his track record at Nokia is decidedly mixed.


At a minimum, though, the understated, steely Canadian will play a critical role in managing Microsoft’s controversial entry into the mobile handset market, and thus shape the future of the software giant as it plunges headlong into the hardware business.


On paper at least, 49-year-old Elop fits the role. He knows broadly how Microsoft works, having spent nearly three years there running the highly profitable Office unit, and has just spent three years in the thick of the mobile war at Nokia.


But that is not enough time to cast him as an “insider” in the minds of many looking to shake up insular Microsoft.


“People are looking for Microsoft to go through some dramatic change,” said Kevin Walkush, an analyst at Jensen Investment Management, which holds Microsoft shares. “He has a very good understanding of what happens at Microsoft, and he has made hard decisions in the face of big challenges. It’s a pretty strong combination.”


The jury is still out on whether Elop saved or put a nail in Nokia’s coffin by making the pivotal decision to adopt Microsoft’s Windows Phone system as its smartphone platform in 2011.


Nokia’s shares fell more than 60 percent during Elop’s tenure as CEO, and its sales collapsed as it jumped from its long-held but outdated Symbian system to the largely untested and unknown Windows, choosing it over the more popular Android system by Google Inc.


“They (Nokia) only have 3 percent market share in smartphones. They lost 40 percent of their revenue in mobile phones in Q2. That’s not a business on stable ground,” said Hakan Wranne, an analyst at Swedbank, summing up Elop’s legacy. “Of course we will never know what would’ve happened if they had chosen Android.”


TRAIL TO FINLAND


But perhaps it could have been worse.


The appointment of Elop as Nokia CEO in 2010, making him the first non-Finn to lead the company, was seen by many at the company as a breath of fresh air.


Many who survived the massive job cuts – around 40,000 since his arrival – credited Elop for turning around a culture that many said lacked speed, decisiveness and a sensitivity towards demands of customers and partners.


Analysts credit him for speeding up product launches over the past year by eliminating unnecessary processes and holding individual executives more accountable.


In an interview in July, Elop said the company spent 22 months on the N8, which used the now-obsolete Symbian operating system and was launched shortly after he joined the company. With Windows phones, he got that down to six- to eight-month delivery cycles.


Many Finns were relieved the Canadian was more understated than Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer or other U.S. tech executives, bonding with his adopted countrymen over a love of ice hockey.


Many were impressed he answered 10 to 20 emails from customers each day.


“He is a nice guy. Everyone liked him. That’s his strength,” said one former Nokia employee who worked closely with Elop and asked not to be named. “He is very down-to-earth, he answers all of his email. His communication skills are very good, but he has got a sense for the dramatic.”


Elop’s dramatic side came to the fore with his startling “Burning Platform” memo sent to staff shortly before he announced the company would adopt Microsoft’s Windows Phone in early 2011, which essentially announced the death of Symbian.


“It was an internal memo but he (Elop) knew it would get out given the situation at Nokia,” said the former Nokia employee who asked not to be named.


But outside the company it was broadly welcomed as the jump-start Nokia needed to change.


“He (Elop) changed the way Nokia operated. And he did a very good job, he was fast at executing and changing the mind-set of the company,” said IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo.


Before he came to Microsoft in 2008, Elop was a fairly high profile Chief Operating Officer at network equipment maker Juniper Networks Inc and before that a president at software firm Adobe Systems Inc.


“He’s got a technical background, he actually understands engineering, he gets it,” said Paul Murphy, formerly Elop’s chief of staff at Microsoft. “I’ve seen him interact with customers, he’s fantastic with customers in difficult situations.”


Less is known about Elop’s stint as Chief Information Officer of restaurant chain Boston Chicken from 1992 to 1998 when the company filed for bankruptcy.


The Nokia deal is not expected to distract the special committee from conducting a thorough search for a new CEO, said one person with knowledge of the matter, hinting strongly that Elop is not a shoo-in for the job, but admitting that he is a probable candidate.


“People can point to his Nokia track record and say that he failed, but he was really dealt a tough hand,” said Walkush at Jensen Investment Management. “He’s demonstrated a lot of leadership and ability.”


(Reporting by Bill Rigby in Seattle, Ritsuko Ando in Helsinki and Pornima Gupta in San Francisco; Editing by Chris Gallagher)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



Savior or slayer? Either way, Nokia"s Elop a contender for Microsoft chief

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

About That Surprise California Budget "Surplus": There is No Surprise and No Surplus Either

Last month writers were all aglow on the state of finances in California. For example …

Accounting Anomaly

Today we learn the surprise $ 5-billion bump in revenue in January is likely an accounting anomaly as a result of tax changes.

The surge of revenue that showed up unexpectedly in state coffers last month may well be offset by a revenue dip in coming months, according to Gov. Jerry Brown’s administration. The surprise money has been the source of much speculation in the Capitol. Unanticipated tax receipts filled state coffers with more than $ 5 billion beyond initial projections for January — more tax dollars than are allocated to the entire state university system in a year.

The revenue bump was historic. But the question for budget experts was whether lawmakers could begin allocating the windfall toward government programs and tax breaks — or whether the money amounted to an accounting anomaly.

Brown’s budget office now advises in an official cash report that it is probably the latter. The report says the extra money was “likely the result of major tax law changes at the federal and state level having a significant impact in the timing of revenue receipts.”

That is: Taxpayers were paying a share of their bill early, getting income off their books in the hope of limiting exposure to the tax hikes that recently kicked in.

Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!

There is no surprise. Are you surprised by the non-surprise? I am not.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis


About That Surprise California Budget "Surplus": There is No Surprise and No Surplus Either