Showing posts with label Repeal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Repeal. Show all posts

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Hey GOP: "Repeal and replace" wont work either

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) (L) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speak at a news conference about the U.S. debt ceiling crisis at the U.S. Capitol in Washington July 30, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst  

Some Republicans think that what the American people want is another massive legislative battle over health care. After a massive debate in 2009, a herculean legislative struggle in 2010, a divisive presidential election in 2012, followed by a national rollout that will take years to implement, the GOP seems to think folks want to do that all over again. In reverse. And then do it again with some new yet undefined GOP plan. Does anyone think the GOP politicians really have that much courage? That the electorate even wants it?

No frickin’ way. Smart Republicans know it.


Republicans had their chance to enact a major health care law when Bush was in power, but they didnt. Had they done so, I seriously doubt Democrats would have had the courage, and opportunity, to do it. But they didn’t and the Democrats did. They only thing they could do is try to stop Obamacare, and they failed. In Congress, at the Supreme Court, and at the ballot box in 2012. Obamacare is now a major part of the body politic and the economy for many years ahead. No serious Republican actually believes there exists the political support for another four years or more of upheaval over yet another health care battle. Make no mistake, Democrats will make it a battle for the ages.


What’s more, what about that beloved “certainty” GOP corporate big shots love so much. They’ve got certainty now because they can see reality: Obamacare isn’t going anywhere and there’s no point in going down the uncertain path of repealing it and replacing it with … something. GOP politicians are lying to their constituents. Eventually their own voters will see that and move on from Obamacare. This battle is over. They lost. They don’t want another war over health care legislation.


GOP politicians have milked repeal for all it’s worth. The market for it is shrinking and they don’t have a new product out there. Repeal is going the way of the BlackBerry.




Daily Kos



Hey GOP: "Repeal and replace" wont work either

Saturday, November 23, 2013

A Century of Failure: Repeal the 16th Amendment

fairtaxTax Code ‘bigger than the Bible with none of the good news’


HOUSTON, Nov. 22, 2013 /Christian Newswire/ — Americans For Fair Taxation® (AFFT) announced today their support for Congressman Jim Bridenstine’s (OK-1) transformational legislation repealing the 16th Amendment to the Constitution.


“As the leading advocate of replacing our corrupt income tax system with a progressive, national consumption tax, AFFT is proud to stand with Representative Bridenstine in repealing the 16th Amendment,” said Cynthia Canevaro, Executive Director.


She added, “Recent IRS scandals repeat a longstanding pattern of political attacks, taxpayer abuse and business destruction by a federal agency that knows no boundaries, has no controls and operates without an ethical compass.”


“In 1913, Congress gilded the lily when they enacted the 16th Amendment, providing the most far-reaching and invasive Congressional failure still burdening the American people today.”


Added Bill Harrington, volunteer Oklahoma FairTax director, “The 16th Amendment is an affront to the American people’s freedom. The IRS has the ability to confiscate property and impose fines on every individual in the United States without due process. We are proud that an Oklahoma Representative has stepped forward to finally address this massive injustice.”


“With the introduction of this legislation, Congressman Bridenstine has given the nation a gift. Congress can continue feeding the special interests fatted calf while ignoring the gross injustices brought about by the 16th Amendment, or they can choose to enact this legislation and begin regaining the American people’s trust and admiration,” said Mrs. Canevaro.


Americans For Fair Taxation: www.FairTax.org

Repeal 16: www.repeal16.org



Americans For Fair Taxation® (FairTax.org) is a national, non-partisan grassroots organization that educates public officials, candidates for office and Americans nationwide on the FairTax to gain support for HR 25/S 122. We do not advocate the election or defeat of any candidate, nor favor any candidate or political party, over another. FairTax.org provides information, briefing materials, public policy data and research for all.


Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to Technorati



Conservative Daily News



A Century of Failure: Repeal the 16th Amendment

Monday, September 9, 2013

Transgender 6-Year-Olds in Potty Spurs California Repeal Drive


Californians jolted by the mental image of children sharing lavatories and locker rooms with opposite-sex classmates are campaigning to repeal the nation’s first law requiring schools to accommodate transgender pupils.


The law, which takes effect Jan. 1, requires all schools receiving state funds to let children choose between boys’ or girls’ bathrooms, for instance, and participate in sex- segregated sports teams based on their gender identity rather than their biological sex.


The drive to put a repeal on the ballot echoes a 2008 initiative, Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment passed by voters that banned same-sex unions. California resumed gay weddings in June following a Supreme Court ruling.


“It is just fundamentally wrong,” said Doug Boyd, a lawyer circulating petitions in the Los Angeles suburb of Glendora. “It’s against the laws of God and nature.”


Boyd, 60, said he can’t stomach the idea of his 6- and 7- year-old daughters sharing school bathrooms, showers or locker rooms with a boy who sees himself as a girl.


A coalition led by the Capitol Resource Institute, a Sacramento-based nonprofit group that promotes itself as a “watchdog for family values,” is seeking about 500,000 signatures to put a repeal on the 2014 ballot.


“This law just goes way too far,” said Karen England, executive director of the institute and a co-leader of the petition drive. “We need to protect the privacy of all students, not just some students.”


Opposite Sex


Transgender people are those who are born as one sex, yet behave and maintain an appearance consistent with the other sex. While Massachusetts, Connecticut, Washington and Colorado have policies on transgender schoolchildren, only California has incorporated them into its laws, according to Equality California, the state’s largest gay-rights group.


The law’s supporters, which include the California State PTA and Governor Jerry Brown, a 75-year-old Democrat, underestimated the public backlash, Boyd said. He said he expects to easily obtain signatures to overturn the law in his neighborhood and at his 5,000-member church, Calvary Chapel Chino Hills.


“I have a 6-year-old daughter and a 7-year-old daughter in public schools and I’ll be darned if there are boys in their bathrooms,” Boyd said. He said he’d put the girls in another school before making them share bathrooms, locker rooms and sports teams with opposite-sex peers.


Accommodation Plan


Michelle Hunter, the Glendora Unified School District’s assistant superintendent for educational services, said officials at the 7,700-student system are awaiting policy guidance on the law from lobbyists for school boards in Sacramento. Hunter said she doesn’t anticipate any costs from the law, as Glendora already has some restrooms for individual students. Boyd said he’s unaware of any transgender students attending his children’s school in Glendora, about 30 miles (45 kilometers) northeast of downtown Los Angeles. Hunter said she couldn’t disclose any information on the number of such students.


In the Los Angeles Unified School District, about 0.5 percent of its 153,000 high-schoolers, or about 763, self- identified as transgender in a 2011 survey, said Judy Chiasson, program coordinator for human relations, diversity and equity.


The Los Angeles and San Francisco school districts already have policies allowing students to use facilities and join sports teams based on their gender identity. Los Angeles administrators have spent “negligible” time accommodating transgender students and there has been no expense to the district, Chiasson said.


Without Incident


In San Francisco, transgender students have used opposite- sex facilities for a decade without incident or cost to the district, said a spokeswoman, Gentle Blythe.


“Most students want privacy so we work out a way they can use the bathroom discreetly if that is what he or she prefers,” Blythe said by e-mail.


Neither school system tracks the number of students who have requested special accommodations, Chiasson and Blythe said.


Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, the San Francisco Democrat who wrote the law, described it as an “important victory” for the rights of transgender people and said it would help children express their true identities. He said he’s not worried by the petition drive.


“The referendum is to be expected,” he said in a statement. “I think it’s marginal, but we’ll watch it.”


The repeal effort faces long odds: Of 76 referendums that qualified for circulation in California since 1912, only 19, or one-fourth, have been passed by voters, according to Secretary of State Debra Bowen’s office.


Law Suspended


The repeal advocates have until Nov. 10 to submit their petition. If they gather enough valid signatures to qualify for the November 2014 ballot, the law would be suspended pending the outcome of the vote, according to Bowen’s office.


England said the campaign against the law stresses the loss of privacy for non-transgender students sharing restrooms, locker rooms and sports teams with peers of the opposite sex, rather than moral objections.


Opponents also are concerned that California may set a precedent for other states, she said.


“It’s going to center around the lack of privacy, the lack of safeguards and the lack of local control,” England said of the campaign. “We see this as common sense.”



© Copyright 2013 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Transgender 6-Year-Olds in Potty Spurs California Repeal Drive

Transgender 6-Year-Olds in Potty Spurs California Repeal Drive


Californians jolted by the mental image of children sharing lavatories and locker rooms with opposite-sex classmates are campaigning to repeal the nation’s first law requiring schools to accommodate transgender pupils.


The law, which takes effect Jan. 1, requires all schools receiving state funds to let children choose between boys’ or girls’ bathrooms, for instance, and participate in sex- segregated sports teams based on their gender identity rather than their biological sex.


The drive to put a repeal on the ballot echoes a 2008 initiative, Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment passed by voters that banned same-sex unions. California resumed gay weddings in June following a Supreme Court ruling.


“It is just fundamentally wrong,” said Doug Boyd, a lawyer circulating petitions in the Los Angeles suburb of Glendora. “It’s against the laws of God and nature.”


Boyd, 60, said he can’t stomach the idea of his 6- and 7- year-old daughters sharing school bathrooms, showers or locker rooms with a boy who sees himself as a girl.


A coalition led by the Capitol Resource Institute, a Sacramento-based nonprofit group that promotes itself as a “watchdog for family values,” is seeking about 500,000 signatures to put a repeal on the 2014 ballot.


“This law just goes way too far,” said Karen England, executive director of the institute and a co-leader of the petition drive. “We need to protect the privacy of all students, not just some students.”


Opposite Sex


Transgender people are those who are born as one sex, yet behave and maintain an appearance consistent with the other sex. While Massachusetts, Connecticut, Washington and Colorado have policies on transgender schoolchildren, only California has incorporated them into its laws, according to Equality California, the state’s largest gay-rights group.


The law’s supporters, which include the California State PTA and Governor Jerry Brown, a 75-year-old Democrat, underestimated the public backlash, Boyd said. He said he expects to easily obtain signatures to overturn the law in his neighborhood and at his 5,000-member church, Calvary Chapel Chino Hills.


“I have a 6-year-old daughter and a 7-year-old daughter in public schools and I’ll be darned if there are boys in their bathrooms,” Boyd said. He said he’d put the girls in another school before making them share bathrooms, locker rooms and sports teams with opposite-sex peers.


Accommodation Plan


Michelle Hunter, the Glendora Unified School District’s assistant superintendent for educational services, said officials at the 7,700-student system are awaiting policy guidance on the law from lobbyists for school boards in Sacramento. Hunter said she doesn’t anticipate any costs from the law, as Glendora already has some restrooms for individual students. Boyd said he’s unaware of any transgender students attending his children’s school in Glendora, about 30 miles (45 kilometers) northeast of downtown Los Angeles. Hunter said she couldn’t disclose any information on the number of such students.


In the Los Angeles Unified School District, about 0.5 percent of its 153,000 high-schoolers, or about 763, self- identified as transgender in a 2011 survey, said Judy Chiasson, program coordinator for human relations, diversity and equity.


The Los Angeles and San Francisco school districts already have policies allowing students to use facilities and join sports teams based on their gender identity. Los Angeles administrators have spent “negligible” time accommodating transgender students and there has been no expense to the district, Chiasson said.


Without Incident


In San Francisco, transgender students have used opposite- sex facilities for a decade without incident or cost to the district, said a spokeswoman, Gentle Blythe.


“Most students want privacy so we work out a way they can use the bathroom discreetly if that is what he or she prefers,” Blythe said by e-mail.


Neither school system tracks the number of students who have requested special accommodations, Chiasson and Blythe said.


Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, the San Francisco Democrat who wrote the law, described it as an “important victory” for the rights of transgender people and said it would help children express their true identities. He said he’s not worried by the petition drive.


“The referendum is to be expected,” he said in a statement. “I think it’s marginal, but we’ll watch it.”


The repeal effort faces long odds: Of 76 referendums that qualified for circulation in California since 1912, only 19, or one-fourth, have been passed by voters, according to Secretary of State Debra Bowen’s office.


Law Suspended


The repeal advocates have until Nov. 10 to submit their petition. If they gather enough valid signatures to qualify for the November 2014 ballot, the law would be suspended pending the outcome of the vote, according to Bowen’s office.


England said the campaign against the law stresses the loss of privacy for non-transgender students sharing restrooms, locker rooms and sports teams with peers of the opposite sex, rather than moral objections.


Opponents also are concerned that California may set a precedent for other states, she said.


“It’s going to center around the lack of privacy, the lack of safeguards and the lack of local control,” England said of the campaign. “We see this as common sense.”



© Copyright 2013 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Transgender 6-Year-Olds in Potty Spurs California Repeal Drive

Transgender 6-Year-Olds in Potty Spurs California Repeal Drive


Californians jolted by the mental image of children sharing lavatories and locker rooms with opposite-sex classmates are campaigning to repeal the nation’s first law requiring schools to accommodate transgender pupils.


The law, which takes effect Jan. 1, requires all schools receiving state funds to let children choose between boys’ or girls’ bathrooms, for instance, and participate in sex- segregated sports teams based on their gender identity rather than their biological sex.


The drive to put a repeal on the ballot echoes a 2008 initiative, Proposition 8, a constitutional amendment passed by voters that banned same-sex unions. California resumed gay weddings in June following a Supreme Court ruling.


“It is just fundamentally wrong,” said Doug Boyd, a lawyer circulating petitions in the Los Angeles suburb of Glendora. “It’s against the laws of God and nature.”


Boyd, 60, said he can’t stomach the idea of his 6- and 7- year-old daughters sharing school bathrooms, showers or locker rooms with a boy who sees himself as a girl.


A coalition led by the Capitol Resource Institute, a Sacramento-based nonprofit group that promotes itself as a “watchdog for family values,” is seeking about 500,000 signatures to put a repeal on the 2014 ballot.


“This law just goes way too far,” said Karen England, executive director of the institute and a co-leader of the petition drive. “We need to protect the privacy of all students, not just some students.”


Opposite Sex


Transgender people are those who are born as one sex, yet behave and maintain an appearance consistent with the other sex. While Massachusetts, Connecticut, Washington and Colorado have policies on transgender schoolchildren, only California has incorporated them into its laws, according to Equality California, the state’s largest gay-rights group.


The law’s supporters, which include the California State PTA and Governor Jerry Brown, a 75-year-old Democrat, underestimated the public backlash, Boyd said. He said he expects to easily obtain signatures to overturn the law in his neighborhood and at his 5,000-member church, Calvary Chapel Chino Hills.


“I have a 6-year-old daughter and a 7-year-old daughter in public schools and I’ll be darned if there are boys in their bathrooms,” Boyd said. He said he’d put the girls in another school before making them share bathrooms, locker rooms and sports teams with opposite-sex peers.


Accommodation Plan


Michelle Hunter, the Glendora Unified School District’s assistant superintendent for educational services, said officials at the 7,700-student system are awaiting policy guidance on the law from lobbyists for school boards in Sacramento. Hunter said she doesn’t anticipate any costs from the law, as Glendora already has some restrooms for individual students. Boyd said he’s unaware of any transgender students attending his children’s school in Glendora, about 30 miles (45 kilometers) northeast of downtown Los Angeles. Hunter said she couldn’t disclose any information on the number of such students.


In the Los Angeles Unified School District, about 0.5 percent of its 153,000 high-schoolers, or about 763, self- identified as transgender in a 2011 survey, said Judy Chiasson, program coordinator for human relations, diversity and equity.


The Los Angeles and San Francisco school districts already have policies allowing students to use facilities and join sports teams based on their gender identity. Los Angeles administrators have spent “negligible” time accommodating transgender students and there has been no expense to the district, Chiasson said.


Without Incident


In San Francisco, transgender students have used opposite- sex facilities for a decade without incident or cost to the district, said a spokeswoman, Gentle Blythe.


“Most students want privacy so we work out a way they can use the bathroom discreetly if that is what he or she prefers,” Blythe said by e-mail.


Neither school system tracks the number of students who have requested special accommodations, Chiasson and Blythe said.


Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, the San Francisco Democrat who wrote the law, described it as an “important victory” for the rights of transgender people and said it would help children express their true identities. He said he’s not worried by the petition drive.


“The referendum is to be expected,” he said in a statement. “I think it’s marginal, but we’ll watch it.”


The repeal effort faces long odds: Of 76 referendums that qualified for circulation in California since 1912, only 19, or one-fourth, have been passed by voters, according to Secretary of State Debra Bowen’s office.


Law Suspended


The repeal advocates have until Nov. 10 to submit their petition. If they gather enough valid signatures to qualify for the November 2014 ballot, the law would be suspended pending the outcome of the vote, according to Bowen’s office.


England said the campaign against the law stresses the loss of privacy for non-transgender students sharing restrooms, locker rooms and sports teams with peers of the opposite sex, rather than moral objections.


Opponents also are concerned that California may set a precedent for other states, she said.


“It’s going to center around the lack of privacy, the lack of safeguards and the lack of local control,” England said of the campaign. “We see this as common sense.”



© Copyright 2013 Bloomberg News. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Transgender 6-Year-Olds in Potty Spurs California Repeal Drive

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Affordable Care Act: Republicans in Congress Vote to Repeal Obamacare


affordable, care, act:, republicans, in, congress, vote, to, repeal, obamacare,

Affordable Care Act Republicans in Congress Vote to Repeal Obamacare




Republicans in Congress are at it again. Thursday will mark the 37th vote taken in the House to repeal the Affordable Care Act that was set into law in 2010. While elected officials cite public disapproval of the health care law; their repeated attempts suggest a strong case of denial among legislators. Despite Speaker of the House, John Boehner announcing the health care as “law of the land,” his fellow GOP members are clinging strongly to the improbable repeal.  


The GOP argues that they are fighting to repeal the “job-killing health care bill” because American’s don’t support the economic effects of the law. However, a recent study conducted by The Kaiser Foundation found that a large number of American’s remain unaware of all components of the law, and the majority wishes to amend it, not de-fund it. Yet despite the preference of constituents, Republicans continue to bring the bill back to a vote, hoping for different results. Republicans should reconsider their approach if they truly wish to make decisions that benefit the country, not only to save their own time, but most importantly to better serve the American people.


If Republicans are truly concerned with the economic consequences of the Affordable Care Act, why are they choosing the most difficult route to do prevent them? Historically, overturning a Supreme Court decision has been extremely difficult with limited constitutional options to repeal the law. While there have been some cases that have been overturned years later, most success for the GOP has been made taking a wider base approach. For example, conservative groups used state level legislation to set records in 2011 for limiting abortion-related services across the United States. Their relentless approach gave them the results, whereas constant voting to repeal a Supreme Court verdict in Congress wastes time, yielding no long-term results.


Bipartisanship, however, would have long-term benefits for the country. Instead of seeking a repeal that is guaranteed to be vetoed by the president, Republicans could look to what their constituents have been calling for. If Republicans want to fix the economy, they could work with Democrats to mollify any potential economic hazards before the law takes full effect this year. Amending the bill through bipartisan compromise will give Americans not only the economic benefits, but the Congress they deserve to have representing them.


So before Republicans schedule their 38th vote, they should reevaluate just what the American people are asking for. Amending the law alongside Democrats could not only prevent the “job-killing” they so deeply fear, but it could remove them from their denial and put them back in sight of what America needs.




PolicyMic



Affordable Care Act: Republicans in Congress Vote to Repeal Obamacare

Friday, May 3, 2013

Cantor Pledges Obamacare Repeal Vote

House Republican freshmen will soon have their first opportunity to vote on repealing President Barack Obama’s 2010 signature health care law, as Majority Leader Eric Cantor said on Friday that such a measure will come to the floor in the near future.

The House voted 36 times to fully repeal or replace Obamacare in the last session of Congress, but freshmen members have not yet had the opportunity to do so.


“I am pleased Eric Cantor has scheduled a vote to repeal Obamacare,” Republican freshman Rep. Trey Radel of Florida told Newsmax. “When even the architects of the bill are referring to it as a train wreck, it’s clear Obamacare is a terrible policy.”


The limited-government, free-market Club for Growth welcomed the upcoming House vote.


“We strongly support the full repeal of Obamacare and we hope that Congress acts to stop this disastrous, anti-growth monstrosity,” Club for Growth spokesman Barney Keller told Newsmax.


As he released the House legislative schedule for May, Cantor said that the House will also vote on tying student loan interest rates to market rates for federal borrowing. The House voted to extend the current rate of 3.4 percent last summer when it was scheduled to increase to 6.8 percent. The current extension runs out at the end of June.


“In the near-term this is expected to provide an interest rate lower than the 6.8 percent fixed in law and over the long-term provide savings for taxpayers,” Cantor said, adding that it will take the politics out setting interest rates and provide a long-term fix.


The House will also vote on the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, creating accountability with the Securities and Exchange Commission, responding to the U.S. hitting its limit on borrowing over the summer, a flex-time bill for private-sector workers, and funding pediatric research.


Cantor said that the House Republicans can expect a heavy workload after it returns from a Memorial Day recess at the end of the month.


“We have a busy legislative agenda planned this summer and our schedule will undoubtedly require further additions,” he said.


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – Politics



Cantor Pledges Obamacare Repeal Vote