Showing posts with label Citizen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Citizen. Show all posts

Friday, March 21, 2014

Proof Barack Obama is NOT a US Citizen? - Got a Minute?

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Proof Barack Obama is NOT a US Citizen? - Got a Minute?

Monday, March 17, 2014

‘Sovereign citizen’ fails to persuade judge that medieval laws give him claim to empty homes

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



‘Sovereign citizen’ fails to persuade judge that medieval laws give him claim to empty homes

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Obama admin weighing another drone strike on U.S. citizen accused of terrorism


By End the Lie


President Barack Obama speaking in 2012 (Image credit: Daniel Borman/Flickr)

President Barack Obama speaking in 2012 (Image credit: Daniel Borman/Flickr)



Obama administration officials revealed that they are considering a drone strike on a U.S. citizen who they say is a member of al-Qaida and actively planning attacks on Americans abroad.


Read our latest: “Security researcher: Sochi hacking story was ’100% fraudulent,’ NBC defends report” and “Plane forced to land after Ukrainian hijacker attempts to divert jet to Sochi


In May of last year, Attorney General Eric Holder publicly confirmed that U.S. drone strikes have killed four American citizens in Yemen in Pakistan without charge or trial.


In the same month, Obama announced new restrictions on drone strikes, which some say may be breached in this case.


While the Obama administration’s policy is that only the military can kill Americans overseas who are suspected terrorists, officials said the president could buck those guidelines and allow the CIA to use a drone strike, according to the National Journal.


The Associated Press cited four unnamed U.S. officials who said that the suspected terrorist is currently in a national that refuses to allow U.S. military operations on their soil. The country also reportedly is unable to pursue the unidentified American citizen.


Two of the officials said the man is an al-Qaeda facilitator who is directly responsible for deadly attacks on American citizens overseas.


The man also “continues to plan attacks against them that would use improvised explosive devices,” according to the two officials cited by AP.


Yet another U.S. official said that the Department of Defense is not yet settled on if the man is actually dangerous enough “to merit the potential domestic fallout of killing an American without charging him with a crime or trying him.”


Another concern would be the significant international issues that could arise if an operation was carried out in a country that will not allow U.S. military action on their territory.


A different U.S. official told the AP that the Pentagon already decided to recommend killing the man.


The suspected terrorist is reportedly in a well-guarded, remote location. Any attempt to capture him using U.S. troops without the approval of the local government “would be risky and even more politically explosive than a U.S. missile strike,” the AP reports, citing military officials.


An unnamed senior administration official said that the Department of justice is currently building a case for the president to review and decide if the strike will be carried out.


The procedure is the same as the one followed when the U.S. killed Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen in 2011. Al-Awlaki was a well-known militant cleric and U.S. citizen.


The Justice Department has to build a case showing that the killing of the American is “legal and constitutional.” The administration has to show that the Pentagon can take action against the citizen as an enemy combatant under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force.


Under the new Obama administration guidelines, they must show that the target poses “continuing, imminent threat to U.S. persons.” Lethal force can only be used “o prevent or stop attacks against U.S. persons, and even then, only when capture is not feasible and no other reasonable alternatives exist to address the threat effectively.”


The AP, as per the government’s request, withheld the name of the country because U.S. officials said it could “interrupt ongoing counterterror operations.”


The Pentagon, CIA and Justice Department all declined to comment for the AP.


We would love to hear your opinion, take a look at your story tips and even your original writing if you would like to get it published. Please email us at [email protected]


Please support alternative news and help us start paying contributors by donating, doing your shopping through our Amazon link or check out some must-have products at our store.





End the Lie – Independent News



Obama admin weighing another drone strike on U.S. citizen accused of terrorism

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Shocking Video – The Former Face of Healthcare.gov Says She Isn’t an American Citizen, Hasn’t Signed up for Obamacare, & Hasn’t Even Been Paid!

Meet Adriana, the Former Face of Obamacare…


Adriana, whose face was plastered on healthcare.gov’s front page from Oct. 1-31, shared her story with ABC News last night.


According to ABC, Adriana is married with a 21 month-old son.  She’s from Columbia, isn’t a U.S. citizen, and hasn’t signed up for Obamacare, though she is eligible to receive federal health benefits since she’s lived in the U.S. legally for six years.


She also expressed frustration with the fact that the government hasn’t even paid her for the use of her image on the Obamacare website.


Adriana told Health and Human Services (HHS) officials to remove her image from the controversial web portal because she claims to consistently get bullied by people who don’t agree with Obamacare.


The Obama Administration, however, denies her assertion that her likeness was removed at her request.


Instead, a HHS spokesman told ABC that the picture was replaced with more generic images because, “Healthcare.gov is a dynamic website.”


Here’s the nearly three minute interview:
video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player


LibertyNEWS.com » Today’s News



Shocking Video – The Former Face of Healthcare.gov Says She Isn’t an American Citizen, Hasn’t Signed up for Obamacare, & Hasn’t Even Been Paid!

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Cities Use Anti-Terrorism Funds to Ramp up Citizen Surveillance for other Purposes

Source: All Gov.

With federal funding intended to thwart terrorism, many American cities have expanded surveillance and intelligence gathering that amounts to an assault on people’s privacy, according to critics.



A prime example is Oakland, California, whose crime-plagued streets prompted local officials and police to develop theDomain Awareness Center. Seven million dollars in federal grants meant to prevent terror attacks at the Oakland port will be used by police to collect and analyze volumes of surveillance data from throughout the city. The data can be gathered from a variety of sources, from gunshot-detection sensors to license plate readers mounted on patrol cars.


The Center is planned as a high-tech operation, fully staffed 24 hours a day, which will display its streams of data on banks of giant wall monitors.


Initially data collection will focus on the port, traffic camera coverage, license plate reading and 911 calls. Eventually, the system will add surveillance of schools, state highways and commuter rail.


Oakland’s efforts, which will begin next summer, demonstrate “how cities are compiling and processing large amounts of information, known as big data, for routine law enforcement,” Somini Sengupta wrote for The New York Times. “And the system underscores how technology has enabled the tracking of people in many aspects of life.”


In New York City, the police department—with the help of federal counterterrorism funding—utilizes a computer network linking information from 3,000 surveillance cameras with license plate readers, radiation sensors, criminal databases and terror suspect lists.


Massachusetts’ law enforcement also has used federal money to buy automated license plate scanners, while police in Arlington, Texas, and the sheriffs office in Montgomery County, Texas, bought drones with homeland security money.


Oakland tried to get its own drone too, but gave up on the idea after citizens spoke out in opposition.


The public has demonstrated increasing displeasure with surveillance of their daily activities. The Seattle City Councildemanded that the city’s police department return a federally financed drone. Iowa City brought about a moratorium on surveillance equipment, including license plate readers. And Virginia state police were forced by the attorney general to destroy its data base filled with millions of citizens’ license plates, including those photographed at political rallies.


Local leaders say these initiatives are all about stopping crime in their communities. But civil libertarians argue that cities go too far when law-abiding citizens are having their every move monitored by police.


The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California labeled Oakland’s program “warrantless surveillance” and said “the city would be able to collect and stockpile comprehensive information about Oakland residents who have engaged in no wrongdoing,” according to the Times.


No indication has been given as to what, if any, parameters the Oakland surveillance center will have, or for what period of time citizens’ personal data will be held in its computers.


Speaking to the Times, Oakland City Council member Libby Schaaf, who supports the program, conceded that the operation would be able to “paint a pretty detailed picture of someone’s personal life, someone who may be innocent.”


Steve Spiker, who researches police technology for the city’s non-profit Urban Strategies Council, expressed to theTimes a concern that others may share: “What happens when someone doesn’t like me and has access to all that information?”


-Noel Brinkerhoff, Danny Biederman


To Learn More:


Privacy Fears Grow as Cities Increase Surveillance (by Somini Sengupta, New York Times)


How the Surveillance State Threatens the ‘Law-Abiding’ Citizen (by Daniel Amico, FreedomWorks)


Oakland’s Port Surveillance System May Expand to the Entire City (by Ken Broder, AllGov California)


Drones over the Homeland (by Tom Barry, Center for International Policy)


L.A. Police Crank up Surveillance Cameras to Spy on 450,000 Residents (by Ken Broder, AllGov California)    


Homeland Security Quietly Runs “Loan-a-Drone” Program for Local Law Enforcement (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)          


Public Buses in Many U.S. Cities Will Soon Be Monitoring Private Conversations for the Government (by Noel Brinkerhoff, AllGov)




BlackListedNews.com



Cities Use Anti-Terrorism Funds to Ramp up Citizen Surveillance for other Purposes

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Egypt detains Turkish citizen on charges of espionage: report



CAIRO | Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:46am EDT



CAIRO (Reuters) – Egypt has detained a Turkish citizen on suspicion of spying and collusion with the Muslim Brotherhood, the state news agency MENA said on Saturday.


The arrest could be a new source of tension between Ankara and Cairo whose relations have all but broken down since Mohamed Mursi, whose Muslim Brotherhood has close ties with Turkey’s ruling AK Party, was ousted from the Egyptian presidency in July.


Rasit Oguz, a 46-year-old Turk, was arrested in the city of Ismailia northeast of Cairo on August 28 while taking photographs of military establishments, security sources said.


MENA said delegates from the Turkish mission in Cairo were following up on his case and had visited him in detention.


Turkey has emerged as one of the fiercest international critics of Mursi’s removal, calling it an “unacceptable coup”.


It recalled its ambassador in August after a violent crackdown on Mursi’s supporters. He returned to Cairo this month but Egypt said it would not reciprocate until Turkey stopped its “interference”.


(Reporting by Shaimaa Fayed; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)





Reuters: Top News



Egypt detains Turkish citizen on charges of espionage: report

Monday, June 17, 2013

Sunday, May 26, 2013

The Story of Jude Mohammad: Why Was a U.S. Citizen Secretly Killed by U.S. Drone in Pakistan?



Transcript



This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.



JUAN GONZÁLEZ: On Wednesday, Attorney General Eric Holder sent a letter to Congress that admitted for the first time that the Obama administration had killed four U.S. citizens in drone strikes overseas. Today we learn about one of those citizens, Jude Kenan Mohammad. Until this week, the FBI had Mohammad listed on its Most Wanted page, even though he was secretly killed by the United States in November 2011.


Well, Mohammad was born in Florida and grew up in Raleigh, North Carolina, with his mother and four sisters, after his parents divorced and his father returned to Pakistan. Friends say he grew up radicalized under the influence of a local man named Daniel Boyd, who had converted to Islam at a young age and was later charged as the ringleader of a group of men, including Mohammad, who were accused in the 2009 stockpiling of weapons and plotting to carry out terrorist attacks overseas.


AMY GOODMAN: When Boyd and the others were arrested on the allegations, Mohammad was no longer living in the United States. He had gone to Pakistan the year before, where he lived with his father. At one point he was briefly detained by Pakistani authorities for lacking the proper travel documents when he tried enter the tribal region along the Afghan border that’s an al-Qaeda and Taliban militant area.


The next time Jude Mohammad’s name surfaced was in the days ahead of the 10th anniversary of 9/11, when the FBI warned of an unconfirmed tip that al-Qaeda planned to set off a car bomb in New York City or D.C. The alleged terror plot was supposedly initiated by then-al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama bin Laden’s successor, who had pledged to avenge bin Laden’s death. The FBI said three other so-called al-Qaeda leaders could be involved. They included 22-year-old Jude Kenan Mohammad. This is how ABC News’ Brian Ross reported it in September of 2011.


BRIAN ROSS: ABC News has in fact learned new details of the source of this troubling information. My colleague Martha Raddatz reports the source overseas is well known and trusted by U.S. officials, but that in this case his information about the vehicle bomb plot may be, at best, secondhand. Even so, officials say at this point they have no choice but to act as if the threat is real and that the clock is ticking.



It was only 48 hours ago, on Wednesday in Pakistan, that officials say the CIA developed the information. Three men, including at least one American citizen, had traveled to the U.S. in mid-August from Pakistan through Dubai, assigned to attack New York or Washington with a vehicle bomb on September 10th, 11th or 12th. Officials call the source credible; the information, very specific but still unconfirmed.



RICHARD CLARKE: “It’s uncorroborated” means there’s only the one source. None of our other sources are saying the same thing. And, so far, we haven’t been able to actually find any evidence in the real world that the report is true.



AMY GOODMAN: That last voice in that Brian Ross ABC News report was Richard Clarke, former national coordinator for security counterterrorism under the George W. Bush administration.


Well, about a month after the FBI said Jude Mohammad was linked to the alleged terror plot, his wife called his mother from Pakistan and said he had been killed in a drone strike in Pakistan. His family was unable to confirm his death with U.S. officials. This is how North Carolina TV news station WRAL reported it months later.


DAVID CRABTREE: Jude Kenan Mohammad went to high school here, then disappeared in a dangerous part of Pakistan known for breeding terror. In this WRAL investigation, Kelcey Carlson found the question is not only where is Jude Kenan Mohammad, but whether or not he’s dead or alive.



KELCEY CARLSON: In November, they heard Jude Mohammad was killed in a drone strike, news that was delivered by his pregnant wife in Pakistan to his mother back here in the Triangle. The U.S. government has not confirmed his death. But the people who knew him here believe it’s probably true.



UNIDENTIFIED: No one has heard from him since then.



JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Well, to learn more about Jude Mohammad, we go to Raleigh, North Carolina, where he grew up, to speak with Khalilah Sabra. She knew Mohammad as a child and stayed in touch with him when he moved to Pakistan as a teenager after dropping out of high school. She’s still close with his mother. Khalilah Sabra is also director of the Muslim American Society Immigrant Justice Center.


Welcome to Democracy Now!


KHALILAH SABRA: Thank you for having me.


JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Could you tell us something about—about Jude Mohammad in his early years and the times that you knew him?


KHALILAH SABRA: Jude was an all-American boy, with the exception of the fact that he was what we call the other victim of 9/11. Jude grew up in a climate of Islamophobia, religious profiling, and it made it very difficult for him to stay here or to find any basis for trust of the American government. In the end, he decided that he would leave this country.


AMY GOODMAN: What is the reaction—what is your reaction, Khalilah, as well as the reaction of his family, of his mother, who lives in North Carolina, to this news of a day ago that the Obama administration now admits that they killed Jude Mohammad in a drone strike?


KHALILAH SABRA: It’s more than just a little bit too late. The government had an obligation to inform his mother that he had been killed. And especially, they should—they have a responsibility to tell her why he was killed. Jude Mohammad was not a senior leader of al-Qaeda. Despite the reasons he went there, there are no indications, no evidence that have been shown to us, that he rose above the level than someone in transition that went to Pakistan. Where is the evidence that links him to al-Qaeda? And who made the decision to target him for death? None of those questions have been answered. And it’s wrong. And I think that the community in Raleigh, as well as his parents, deserve an answer to those questions.


JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Now, for his mother now, these two years since they first got word that he might be dead and now this official word, how has she been able to deal with this uncertainty, not knowing for sure what had happened to him?


KHALILAH SABRA: I think that she accepted the fact that he was dead a long time ago, but in the absence of confirmation, it’s perfectly normal to have a little bit of hope that somehow he might be alive. If the government purposely withheld this information, then they did her a great disservice. And she has suffered behind the fact that his death has not been acknowledged. She loved her son. This was her son. And she deserved to know what happened to him.


AMY GOODMAN: Khalilah Sabra, can you tell us what you understand did happen? How was he killed in this drone attack that the U.S. government is admitting this week, despite the fact that even after the Attorney General Eric Holder’s letter came out saying, yes, they killed Jude Mohammad, that his face and name was up on the FBI Most Wanted list?


KHALILAH SABRA: First of all, the fact he was on the FBI’s Most Wanted list doesn’t mean that he’s received due process and that he’s been convicted of anything. I think that, like I said, they had an obligation to say why he was there, who he was with, why he was—from what we know, he was with a group of people, and a drone was dropped on top of them. Why he came to be targeted or allowed to be killed with this group of people is still unknown to us.


JUAN GONZÁLEZ: What about this group that he was accused of being a co-conspirator with, the David Boyd group? Could you talk about that case and its impact in your city?


KHALILAH SABRA: Daniel Boyd was convicted along with a group of youths for conspiring to commit acts of terrorism. Jude, I think, was—should be considered a separate entity. First of all, when he was indicted, he wasn’t here. He had been gone for a very long time. We don’t know exactly what the allegations are against him. And the fact that he hasn’t been convicted of anything says a lot about his rights. Now, just because—the other ones were convicted. Daniel Boyd took a plea deal and basically threw the other ones under the bus. But, you know, there’s still a lot of unanswered questions about what was the role of Jude Mohammad in that entire situation.


AMY GOODMAN: Did you ever see any evidence against Jude Mohammad?


KHALILAH SABRA: No, no. And his—


AMY GOODMAN: Can you talk about Jude Mohammad’s wife? She was pregnant when he was killed?


KHALILAH SABRA: All I know about his wife is that she was pregnant when he was killed. She called his mother, and she gave her the news that her son had in fact died in a drone attack. So the fact he was killed by a drone is not unknown to his parents and to the community. I mean, that was established or known by the community a long time ago. Or—but without confirmation, he couldn’t even receive what is the customary funeral prayer, without confirmation of that. And that had an effect on his mother, too.


JUAN GONZÁLEZ: You mentioned—you mentioned earlier the impact of Islamophobia on Jude Mohammad. Could you talk about, in Charlotte, the atmosphere post-9/11 that the Muslim community confronted?


KHALILAH SABRA: The atmosphere was rough, like it was rough all over America. You had people being detained. You had people being arrested on immigration violations that had no criminal history. You had profiling. You had extensive investigation of people with Muslim last names, Muslim first names. You had students being harassed and bullied in school. We hear about a lot these days about students being bullied in school, but to have the experience of being a Muslim and being bullied in school for geopolitical reasons is something else. It was very difficult, especially for that generation, the kids that grew up with Jude, to be able to deal with and have that and feel—and not be protected in the educational institutions across America. That’s a crime in itself.


AMY GOODMAN: Khalilah Sabra, I want to thank you very much for being with us, knew Jude Kenan Mohammad, one of the four Americans the U.S. government has admitted killing in drone strikes. Al-Awlaki and his son were also named, as well as Samir Khan, who was in Charlotte, North Carolina.


That does it for our show. If you want to see our discussion with Noam Chomsky and Jeremy Scahill around Dirty Wars, you can go to our website at democracynow.org.




Powered By WizardRSS.com | RFID Wallet Blocking Cards

Democracy Now!

The Story of Jude Mohammad: Why Was a U.S. Citizen Secretly Killed by U.S. Drone in Pakistan?