Showing posts with label Graham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Graham. Show all posts

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Gingrich, Graham Warn of Military Standoff if US Fails to Help Ukraine


Two prominent Republicans are warning that failure of the United States to deter Russia in Ukraine will only embolden Russian President Vladimir Putin and could end in a military standoff.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich of Georgia write in an op-ed on CNN.com that failure of the United States and Western Europe to act could give Putin the green light to “test our resolve” in Latvia, Lithuania, or Estonia.


Those three former Soviet republics are now members of NATO, which all other NATO members, including the United States, are bound by treaty to protect with military force.


“Trouble there could ‘reset’ us right back to direct warfare with Russia,” the two write. “That would be a disaster and very, very dangerous.”


Passivity, they say, is the path most likely to lead to war.


“The Obama administration should grant the request for military aid immediately — before it’s too late for deterrence,” they write.


Gingrich and Graham also call for President Barack Obama to immediately issue an executive order approving the export of American natural gas to 20 countries awaiting bureaucratic approval.


“The highest priority should go to approving exports to Europe, where in many places, Russia has a near-monopoly on natural gas,” they said.


They also call on Obama to issue an executive order approving 24 pending liquefied natural gas facilities they say have been delayed by “bureaucratic red tape.”


Europe is heavily dependent on natural gas from Russia, leading many Republicans to call on increased production in the United States to lessen Putin’s stranglehold on Europe, which has been less willing to buy into sanctions against Russia for fear of it holding back energy exports.


The op-ed notes that while Obama hosted Ukraine’s interim Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk last week as a show of support and Secretary of State John Kerry announced “very serious” steps if Russia does not back down by Monday from its attempt to annex Crimea, those words must be backed by action.


“Theodore Roosevelt is famous for a foreign policy he summarized as ‘speak softly and carry a big stick,’” the pair wrote. “Obama’s foreign policy is closer to ‘scream loudly and carry no stick.’”

Related Stories:




© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – Newsfront



Gingrich, Graham Warn of Military Standoff if US Fails to Help Ukraine

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Sen. Lindsey Graham: Ukraine "started with Benghazi"

U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) speaks to the press following his private meeting with United States U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice about the attack on U.S. diplomats in Benghazi, Libya, on Capitol Hill in Washington, November 27, 2012.   REUTERS/Jason Ree
He"s not just smart, he"s Sunday show smart.


Oh, Sen. Lindsey Graham. If you didn’t exist we’d have to make you up.

It started with Benghazi. When you kill Americans and nobody pays a price, you invite this type of aggression. #Ukraine
@GrahamBlog


The perfect distillation of Republican genius, right there.



Daily Kos



Sen. Lindsey Graham: Ukraine "started with Benghazi"

Sunday, March 2, 2014

Graham: Nobody in the World Should Legitimize Using Troops to Invade a Country



If we had anything resembling a functioning media in this country, this one segment should have demanded that Candy Crowley follow up with minimally a “Are you serious, Sen. Graham? Does the name Iraq mean anything to you?” if not flat out laughing in Huckleberry Graham’s face:


CROWLEY: What do you make of that position, that a Russian view of this [the turmoil in the Crimea] is not totally understood or taken into account?


read more



Latest from Crooks and Liars



Graham: Nobody in the World Should Legitimize Using Troops to Invade a Country

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Lindsey Graham: The World Is Literally Blowing Up


Shortly after President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told reporters point-blank: “The world is literally a…
Video Rating: 4 / 5



Lindsey Graham: The World Is Literally Blowing Up

Friday, December 20, 2013

Saudi"s involvement in 9/11 - LIVE with Senator Bob Graham

A featured video on 9/11 and the issues surrounding the event.



On 19 December we hosted a live interview with Bob Graham, a former US senator from Florida and the co-chair of the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11. We…
Video Rating: 4 / 5



Saudi"s involvement in 9/11 - LIVE with Senator Bob Graham

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Franklin Graham Continues Charity Work Despite Fears for Father"s Health

Franklin Graham is pushing on with Operation Christmas Child to aid children in the Philippines despite fears for his father, Rev. Billy Graham. The well-known evangelist “hasn’t got his strength back” after contracting an infection days after his 95th birthday last month, Graham said about his father.

“He’s not doing real well. He celebrated his 95th birthday on November 7th. About a week later, he got an infection, was in the hospital for a few days, came home. But, he just hasn’t got his strength back,” Graham told “Fox & Friends” Thursday.


Story continues below video.



Though not in pain, Graham said his father is “just very weak,” and asked for prayers for his health.


“I know he would appreciate your prayers. The family would, I know that. His vitals are good,” Graham said. “He is comfortable and strong.”


Graham explained the goal of Operation Christmas Child was to provide shoeboxes packed by volunteers and filled with supplies for children in need. He said this year the program filled 10 million shoeboxes, and 60,000 shipped Thursday to children in the Typhoon ravaged Philippines.


“We’re going to focus now on the kids. These people lost everything,” Graham said.
The boxes are packed by individual families, Graham said, with each one blessed by prayer by those who packed the box for the child who receives it.


“I don’t know who will get it, but God does. And, we know God is going to hear the prayer of one righteous person. Can you imagine ten million people praying for ten million children?” Graham asked.


“Every box is like snowflakes, no two are the same. Kids pack them. And, we’re teaching kids to give. And, that’s important, that another generation learns how to give,” Graham said.


“I want every child who gets a box to know about the true meaning of Christmas.”


Related Stories:
Franklin Graham: Father Never Changed His Message
Billy Graham ‘Extremely Weak’: Son Asks for Prayers


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Franklin Graham Continues Charity Work Despite Fears for Father"s Health

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Harry Potter vs. Twilight, Onion News" Will Graham : ...

Harry Potter vs. Twilight, Onion News" Will Graham : ...
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TrGmmzv7AG8/mqdefault.jpg



Harry Potter vs. Twilight, Onion News

This week, RGS welcomes Will Graham, executive producer of the Onion News Network and features Bobby bothering the fans of the new Harry Potter Movie at the …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Harry Potter vs. Twilight, Onion News" Will Graham : ... and other interesting subjects concerning Humor at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

EXCLUSIVE: Retired FBI Agent Jim Graham Dismantles JFK Assassination Conspiracy Theories

A featured video on the subject of assassinations:



Tallgrass Creek resident Jim Graham, a retired FBI agent who investigated the JFK assassination and Lee Harvey Oswald, dismantles conspiracy theories. He sat…
Video Rating: 3 / 5



EXCLUSIVE: Retired FBI Agent Jim Graham Dismantles JFK Assassination Conspiracy Theories

Monday, November 18, 2013

Graham Hancock & Joe Rogan: Back Together Again



Graham Hancock returns to the Joe Rogan’s podcast show. Turn On, Tune In… and get comfortable because it’s nearly a three hour Experience.




disinformation



Graham Hancock & Joe Rogan: Back Together Again

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Lindsey Graham to Introduce 20-Week Abortion Ban


Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) plans to lead Senate Republicans in a push for a federal ban on abortions after the end of the 20th week of pregnancy.


The measure is a companion to the House-passed Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act that was led by Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ).


“Science tells us that unborn babies can feel touch as soon as eight weeks into the pregnancy; they feel pain at 20 weeks,” said Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), leading the debate on the floor of the House.


According to the Washington Examiner, Republican aides in both chambers of Congress confirmed that Graham is the lead sponsor of the Senate bill and will introduce the measure in the coming week.


Concerns among Republican senators about the proposal have included one from pro-life Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), who said thought should be given regarding the constitutionality of invoking Congress’ authority to regulate commerce as the basis for the legislation. President Obama’s attorneys invoked the same constitutional provision to defend ObamaCare’s individual mandate.


The Supreme Court upheld a partial-birth abortion ban rooted in the Commerce Clause in 2003. Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, however, emphasized in a concurring opinion that “the court’s abortion jurisprudence… has no basis in the Constitution.”


The justices added that “whether the Act constitutes a permissible exercise of Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause is not before the Court.”


Recently, liberal Constitutional attorney Alan Dershowitz said there has never been any constitutional right to abortion in the Constitution.


By introducing a measure such as an abortion ban, Graham may be hoping to bolster his effort to keep primary challengers at bay.


As Breitbart News’ Michael Patrick Leahy reported in July, Graham is being challenged in the 2014 South Carolina Republican primary:


Tea Party groups across the state unanimously oppose Graham. They view him as a RINO who does not support the constitutionally limited government values of the movement. However, to date they have not coalesced around a single challenger.







    








Breitbart Feed



Lindsey Graham to Introduce 20-Week Abortion Ban

Monday, October 28, 2013

Bengazhi Cover Up: Lindsey Graham Wants Hearings, and Wants Them Now


Today is the Senate’s first day back from recess, and the nation’s most august lawmaking body is already settling in for another round of intractable partisan gridlock. This time, Senator Lindsay Graham is threatening to block all nominations from the White House unless a joint select committee to look into last year’s embassy attack in Benghazi, Libya is established. This comes in light of last night’s 60 Minutes program about the attack.


Graham’s position is dripping with irony, because it was only three months ago that he was calling the filibuster against Richard Cordray (now head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) “

The GOP is not in full consensus over this, and Graham is going against party leadership with this move: House Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell have both expressed opposition to setting up a Benghazi commission. Hopefully something will convince Graham to either change his mind, or the Senate might circumvent him procedurally getting rid of the filibuster this session. Fights like this one only lead the president to have a longer and longer backlog of federal appointees. Like most things carried out by Congress, this new blockage is likely meant to send a message to Graham’s potential primary voters rather than actually accomplish anything for the American people.



Alex Cline
Alex Cline

Alex Cline is a media educator and activist around criminal justice issues in New Orleans, Louisiana.





PolicyMic



Bengazhi Cover Up: Lindsey Graham Wants Hearings, and Wants Them Now

Graham to block picks over Benghazi


Sen. Lindsey Graham said Monday he will hold up “every appointment” in the Senate until more questions are answered on Benghazi.


“I’m going to block every appointment in the United States Senate until the survivors [of the attack in Benghazi] are being made available to the Congress,” Graham said on Fox News’s “Fox and Friends.” “I’m tired of hearing from people on TV and reading about stuff in books.”







Graham (R-S.C.), who also tweeted about wanting to talk to those survivors, said Congress needs to “up its game”. He called for a joint select committee and addressed House Republicans on their efforts to continue pressing the administration on Benghazi.


(PHOTOS: 10 slams on Obama and Benghazi)


“If we don’t have a joint select committee to get out of this stove piping problem, we’re never going to get the truth,” Graham said.


“To my House colleagues, [Rep.] Darrell Issa has done great job. To Speaker [John] Boehner, please for God’s sakes, form a joint committee to get away from this blame game and find out exactly what happened,” Graham said.


Graham also said that he thinks information has been classified for “political reasons more than anything else” and that Congress will continue to push this issue.


“We’re just beginning on Benghazi,” the senator said. “And to the families, we’re not going to let this go.”




POLITICO – Congress



Graham to block picks over Benghazi

Sunday, September 15, 2013

U.S.-Russia deal will allow Assad to "delay and deceive": McCain, Graham say


U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), (R), makes remarks to the media as U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ), (L), listens, after meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama at the White House, on possible military action against Syria, in Washington September 2, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Mike Theiler




Reuters: Politics



U.S.-Russia deal will allow Assad to "delay and deceive": McCain, Graham say

Friday, August 9, 2013

Thank You, Graham Family


WASHINGTON — Thank you, Eugene Meyer. Thank you, Philip Graham, Katharine Graham, Donald Graham and Katharine Weymouth. Thank you for building and sustaining one of the world’s greatest newspapers — and, when the time came, letting it go.


Thank you, Mr. Meyer, for spending $ 825,000 to buy The Washington Post at a bankruptcy sale. That was a lot of money in 1933, but you could afford it. You were a wealthy financier who could have retired to a life of leisure.


You chose to own a newspaper, which is the opposite of leisure.


Thank you for writing your “Seven Principles for the Conduct of a Newspaper” — the commandments by which we try our best to live. I hope your words, outlining our mission and responsibilities, are always displayed in the Post’s lobby, as they have been for the 33 years I’ve worked here. I won’t quote them all, just the one that seems most relevant this week:


“The newspaper’s duty is to its readers and to the public at large, and not to the private interests of its owner.”


Thank you, Philip Graham, for your ambition. When you took over from your father-in-law, the Post was hardly a dominant journalistic force nationally or even locally. You changed that.


Thank you for buying the competing morning paper, the Times-Herald, which allowed the Post to eventually overtake the once-dominant Evening Star in both circulation and advertising. Thank you for buying the company’s first radio and television stations. And thanks especially for buying Newsweek. The magazine has different owners now and is pretty much on life support, but for decades it gave haughty Time a run for its money.


Thank you, Katharine Graham, for … I don’t even know where to begin. How about this: Thank you for being one of the most important newspaper publishers in history.


Thank you for hiring Ben Bradlee as your executive editor. Thank you for recognizing that this handsome, swashbuckling Bostonian possessed both a first-class mind and the nerves of a gunslinger. You stood by Ben during the Post’s publication of the Pentagon Papers, when the newspaper’s future was at stake. You stood by him during Watergate, when the nation’s future was at stake. Ultimately, you made the crucial decisions — and they were the right ones.


Thank you, Mrs. Graham — you said to call you Kay, but I never could — for your ability to sound like a prim and proper patrician one minute and swear like a sailor the next. Thank you for your ferocity in defense of the newsroom. I remember one luncheon in your office suite at which you tore into some bureaucrat from the Chinese Embassy over a visa problem our correspondent in Beijing was having. You were genteel but utterly relentless, and by the time dessert was served the poor man looked about to cry.


Thank you also for your graciousness. When I was editor of the Style section, my wife Avis and I decided to host a party for leaders of the local arts community who felt unappreciated by the newspaper. I was delighted when you agreed to stop by for a minute and say hello; I was amazed when you stayed all evening, charming our star-struck guests — and proving that this great, gray, intimidating institution really did care.


Thank you, Don Graham, for propelling the Post to its greatest glory — so far. Len Downie was your Ben Bradlee, the ideal partner. Outsiders think of the Kay-and-Ben era as the Post’s golden age, but it was in the Don-and-Len era that the paper hit its peak in terms of circulation, advertising, the number of journalists in the newsroom, the number of foreign bureaus — just about any measure you can think of. Under Downie, the Post won 25 Pulitzer Prizes — by far the most any paper has won under a single editor.


Thank you, Don, for treating every one of us like family. I’m going to sound mushy here, but it’s true. Your kindness when anyone at the Post suffered a personal crisis was unlimited. You shared our sorrow at moments of grief and our joy at moments of triumph. I am so proud to call you my friend.


Thank you, Katharine Weymouth, for joining your uncle Don in the thankless task of downsizing the Post without stripping it of its greatness. Thank you for helping him make the wrenching decision to sell. And thank you for staying as publisher after the paper changes hands — ensuring that the remarkable work of a remarkable family goes on. 




RealClearPolitics – Articles



Thank You, Graham Family

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Third challenger to join Graham race


Another GOP primary challenger to South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is making it official.


State Sen. Lee Bright has readied his campaign website and is inviting supporters to sign up for an alert when he posts his official announcement video. The campaign advertises a full website “coming soon.”







Bright posted the just-launched website on his Facebook page on Tuesday, saying, “It’s almost time.” He told The State that an official announcement was in the works for next week.


Graham drew his second official challenger, Citadel graduate Nancy Mace, last week. Businessman Richard Cash has also launched a campaign against Graham.


The Republican senator has been under fire from conservatives who paint him as too willing to compromise with Democrats on issues including taxes and immigration. Graham is currently on a trip to Egypt with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), with the go-ahead from the White House, in an effort to push democracy in the country that just underwent what the pair call a coup.


Graham brushed off the primary challenges during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, saying, “I will continue to be Lindsey Graham.”




POLITICO – Congress



Third challenger to join Graham race

Third challenger to join Graham race


Another GOP primary challenger to South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham is making it official.


State Sen. Lee Bright has readied his campaign website and is inviting supporters to sign up for an alert when he posts his official announcement video. The campaign advertises a full website “coming soon.”







Bright posted the just-launched website on his Facebook page on Tuesday, saying, “It’s almost time.” He told The State that an official announcement was in the works for next week.


Graham drew his second official challenger, Citadel graduate Nancy Mace, last week. Businessman Richard Cash has also launched a campaign against Graham.


The Republican senator has been under fire from conservatives who paint him as too willing to compromise with Democrats on issues including taxes and immigration. Graham is currently on a trip to Egypt with Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), with the go-ahead from the White House, in an effort to push democracy in the country that just underwent what the pair call a coup.


Graham brushed off the primary challenges during an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday, saying, “I will continue to be Lindsey Graham.”




POLITICO – Congress



Third challenger to join Graham race

Monday, August 5, 2013

Sen. Graham: Benghazi Represented Al-Qaeda On Steroids


Infowars.com
August 4, 2013


Talking with CNN’s State of the Union Sunday morning host Candy Crowley, Senator Lindsey Graham said “these al Qaeda types are really on steroids thinking we’re weaker and they’re stronger” after the Benghazi attack.


Graham’s remarks are at odds with a number of reports indicating al-Qaeda is a shadow of its former self.


“If we look carefully and objectively at the evolution of the al Qaeda brand over the past 12 years, what is clear is a pattern of al Qaeda (or some quasi-organized group acting in its name) pushing into a vacuum, overplaying its hand, and retreating back into the bush when it meets resistance,” RAND reported in February after the Benghazi attack. “In Iraq, in Yemen, in Somalia, and now in Algeria, al Qaeda wannabes and copycats, even those truly committed to bin Laden’s global jihad, have repeatedly made the same mistakes and have sown the seeds of their own eventual destruction.”


Many people believe, however, at the risk of being chalked up as conspiracy theorists, that al-Qaeda in fact does not exist as an organization or a threat.


The former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons before his death that “al-Qaeda” is not a terrorist organization but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to send guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan.


“The terrorist group al-Qaeda in fact does not exist,” writes Mark Perkel. “It was made up in January of 2001 in order to prosecute Osama bin Laden in his absence. In order to prosecute bin Laden there had to be an organization like the Mafia for which he was a part of. Under the law if such an organization exists then the head of the organization can be prosecuted under the law. So in order to bring the prosecution they made up the organization and called it al-Qaeda. But the organization is fiction. It doesn’t exist. It’s all a huge fraud.”


This was convincingly demonstrated in the BBC documentary, The Power of Nightmares.


“The idea which is critical to the FBI’s prosecution that bin Laden ran a coherent organization with operatives and cells all around the world of which you could be a member is a myth,” said Power of Nightmares contributor Jason Burke. “There is no Al Qaeda organization. There is no international network with a leader, with cadres who will unquestioningly obey orders, with tentacles that stretch out to sleeper cells in America, in Africa, in Europe. That idea of a coherent, structured terrorist network with an organized capability simply does not exist.”


“Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working,” declared British Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair.


It is also, for Lindsey Graham and his sidekick, Arizona Senator John McCain, a way to periodically remind the American people that there is a war on terror in progress — and there will be for generations to come if they have anything to say about it.


This article was posted: Sunday, August 4, 2013 at 9:35 pm


Tags: domestic news, terrorism, war









Infowars



Sen. Graham: Benghazi Represented Al-Qaeda On Steroids

Sen. Graham: Benghazi Represented Al-Qaeda On Steroids


Infowars.com
August 4, 2013


Talking with CNN’s State of the Union Sunday morning host Candy Crowley, Senator Lindsey Graham said “these al Qaeda types are really on steroids thinking we’re weaker and they’re stronger” after the Benghazi attack.


Graham’s remarks are at odds with a number of reports indicating al-Qaeda is a shadow of its former self.


“If we look carefully and objectively at the evolution of the al Qaeda brand over the past 12 years, what is clear is a pattern of al Qaeda (or some quasi-organized group acting in its name) pushing into a vacuum, overplaying its hand, and retreating back into the bush when it meets resistance,” RAND reported in February after the Benghazi attack. “In Iraq, in Yemen, in Somalia, and now in Algeria, al Qaeda wannabes and copycats, even those truly committed to bin Laden’s global jihad, have repeatedly made the same mistakes and have sown the seeds of their own eventual destruction.”


Many people believe, however, at the risk of being chalked up as conspiracy theorists, that al-Qaeda in fact does not exist as an organization or a threat.


The former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons before his death that “al-Qaeda” is not a terrorist organization but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to send guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan.


“The terrorist group al-Qaeda in fact does not exist,” writes Mark Perkel. “It was made up in January of 2001 in order to prosecute Osama bin Laden in his absence. In order to prosecute bin Laden there had to be an organization like the Mafia for which he was a part of. Under the law if such an organization exists then the head of the organization can be prosecuted under the law. So in order to bring the prosecution they made up the organization and called it al-Qaeda. But the organization is fiction. It doesn’t exist. It’s all a huge fraud.”


This was convincingly demonstrated in the BBC documentary, The Power of Nightmares.


“The idea which is critical to the FBI’s prosecution that bin Laden ran a coherent organization with operatives and cells all around the world of which you could be a member is a myth,” said Power of Nightmares contributor Jason Burke. “There is no Al Qaeda organization. There is no international network with a leader, with cadres who will unquestioningly obey orders, with tentacles that stretch out to sleeper cells in America, in Africa, in Europe. That idea of a coherent, structured terrorist network with an organized capability simply does not exist.”


“Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working,” declared British Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair.


It is also, for Lindsey Graham and his sidekick, Arizona Senator John McCain, a way to periodically remind the American people that there is a war on terror in progress — and there will be for generations to come if they have anything to say about it.


This article was posted: Sunday, August 4, 2013 at 9:35 pm


Tags: domestic news, terrorism, war









Infowars



Sen. Graham: Benghazi Represented Al-Qaeda On Steroids

Sen. Graham: Benghazi Represented Al-Qaeda On Steroids


Infowars.com
August 4, 2013


Talking with CNN’s State of the Union Sunday morning host Candy Crowley, Senator Lindsey Graham said “these al Qaeda types are really on steroids thinking we’re weaker and they’re stronger” after the Benghazi attack.


Graham’s remarks are at odds with a number of reports indicating al-Qaeda is a shadow of its former self.


“If we look carefully and objectively at the evolution of the al Qaeda brand over the past 12 years, what is clear is a pattern of al Qaeda (or some quasi-organized group acting in its name) pushing into a vacuum, overplaying its hand, and retreating back into the bush when it meets resistance,” RAND reported in February after the Benghazi attack. “In Iraq, in Yemen, in Somalia, and now in Algeria, al Qaeda wannabes and copycats, even those truly committed to bin Laden’s global jihad, have repeatedly made the same mistakes and have sown the seeds of their own eventual destruction.”


Many people believe, however, at the risk of being chalked up as conspiracy theorists, that al-Qaeda in fact does not exist as an organization or a threat.


The former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons before his death that “al-Qaeda” is not a terrorist organization but a database of international mujaheddin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to send guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan.


“The terrorist group al-Qaeda in fact does not exist,” writes Mark Perkel. “It was made up in January of 2001 in order to prosecute Osama bin Laden in his absence. In order to prosecute bin Laden there had to be an organization like the Mafia for which he was a part of. Under the law if such an organization exists then the head of the organization can be prosecuted under the law. So in order to bring the prosecution they made up the organization and called it al-Qaeda. But the organization is fiction. It doesn’t exist. It’s all a huge fraud.”


This was convincingly demonstrated in the BBC documentary, The Power of Nightmares.


“The idea which is critical to the FBI’s prosecution that bin Laden ran a coherent organization with operatives and cells all around the world of which you could be a member is a myth,” said Power of Nightmares contributor Jason Burke. “There is no Al Qaeda organization. There is no international network with a leader, with cadres who will unquestioningly obey orders, with tentacles that stretch out to sleeper cells in America, in Africa, in Europe. That idea of a coherent, structured terrorist network with an organized capability simply does not exist.”


“Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working,” declared British Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair.


It is also, for Lindsey Graham and his sidekick, Arizona Senator John McCain, a way to periodically remind the American people that there is a war on terror in progress — and there will be for generations to come if they have anything to say about it.


This article was posted: Sunday, August 4, 2013 at 9:35 pm


Tags: domestic news, terrorism, war









Infowars



Sen. Graham: Benghazi Represented Al-Qaeda On Steroids

Saturday, August 3, 2013

Crowded S.C. Primary Poses Challenge for Graham



Though no one thinks it’ll be easy, the word is out among ambitious South Carolina conservatives: Lindsey Graham really is susceptible to defeat in 2014.


Newcomer Nancy Mace and libertarian-leaning state Sen. Lee Bright are set to become the second and third GOP candidates to announce their intentions to run against the second-term senator, and political watchers in the Palmetto State believe the field may expand even further in the coming weeks.


At first glance, when gaming out Graham’s chances of surviving a multi-candidate primary and going on to win re-election, the logic seems simple: the more competitors, the merrier.


For a lawmaker who has long raised the ire of some rank-and-file conservatives with his deal-brokering and occasional breeches from Republican orthodoxy, there is a benefit to splitting the Tea Party vote into as many parts as possible.


But this line of reasoning has a potential flaw: South Carolina electoral law stipulates that a candidate must win at least 50 percent of the primary vote to avoid a runoff, and Graham’s chances of reaching that threshold could become even more difficult with additional names on the ballot.


And in a one-on-one runoff , all bets are off for Graham, who would likely have to fight tooth and nail for his political survival.


Former South Carolina GOP Chairman Katon Dawson — who runs a super PAC supporting the already well-funded incumbent — explained in stark terms the challenge ahead: “Fifty percent in a three- or four-person race is a hard number to get to. It just is. My expectation would be a runoff.”


The pro-Graham super PAC, West Main Street Values PAC, has raised just over $ 78,000 so far this year, but Dawson maintained that the group would be “well prepared” to compete next year against the large sums of outside money expected to arrive from conservative groups hoping to defeat Graham.


Nonetheless, Dawson has been sending a message to the senator’s allies in Washington and nationwide that it won’t be easy for Graham to win this one.


“What leads to heartache in Republican primaries is small turnout, which makes it dicey,” he said.


To understand just how dicey things can get for Republicans branded with the “establishment” label these days, one need only look back to Ted Cruz’s once unlikely election to the Senate last year in Texas.


When incumbent Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson decided to retire rather than seek a fourth term, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst was pegged as the clear favorite to succeed her. And in the crowded primary in which six Republican candidates earned at least 1 percent of the vote, Dewhurst bested Cruz by a hefty 11-point margin (45 percent to 34 percent).


But in their runoff two months later, the Tea Party-backed Cruz easily defeated his opponent (57 percent to 43 percent) to win the nomination on the way to a general election victory in the deep-red state.


It’s a playbook that many hard-right South Carolina Republicans are increasingly confident can be replicated to unseat Graham.


“I think that Lindsey Graham is vulnerable,” said state Sen. Tom Davis, a top figure in the South Carolina GOP’s libertarian wing. “The energy in the Republican Party is moving in a direction opposite from where people like Lindsey and John McCain and some of the more establishment Republicans stand.”


While Davis declined to cite a challenger he considers the most viable, he did single out Mace as someone who enjoys deep connections with “the liberty grassroots” in the state, in part due to her early endorsement and vocal advocacy for Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign.


As the first female to graduate from The Citadel, the 35-year-old mother of two also has a ready-made story to tell. Still, the politically untested Mace would have her work cut out for her in a campaign against Graham, even if it were to go to a runoff.


“I don’t know Nancy, but I think it’s going to be particularly tough for her– or anyone taking on Lindsey — who has never held statewide office or even run for statewide office, to try to unseat a sitting United States senator, who, for the most part, has a pretty strong track record and also deep resources in the bank,” said South Carolina Republican operative Mike Campbell, a Graham supporter. “You can’t just run on sound bites. There has to be depth there.”


Graham’s full-throated advocacy for the immigration reform bill that passed the Senate earlier this year will no doubt be among his greatest liabilities in the primary, as the issue is a juicy slab of red meat for his opponents to bite into.


Polling in the still-developing primary race has been scant, but a Winthrop survey showed that Graham’s approval rating among South Carolina Republicans had dipped from 71.6 percent in February to 57.5 percent in April.


While that slippage isn’t grounds for panic, especially considering all of Graham’s inherent advantages, the current climate is sparking cautious optimism for his many vocal detractors in the state. 




RealClearPolitics – Articles



Crowded S.C. Primary Poses Challenge for Graham