Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abortion. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Hobby Lobby invests in contraceptive, abortion drug manufacturers


20% off hypocritical blowhards, just bring this coupon


It’s peculiar how a group of individuals who are so devoted to their religious beliefs that they demand the very laws of the nation be rewritten to accommodate them can be so lax about those same religious beliefs if ignoring them will net them a little dough.

Documents filed with the Department of Labor and dated December 2012—three months after the company’s owners filed their lawsuit—show that the Hobby Lobby 401(k) employee retirement plan held more than $ 73 million in mutual funds with investments in companies that produce emergency contraceptive pills, intrauterine devices, and drugs commonly used in abortions. Hobby Lobby makes large matching contributions to this company-sponsored 401(k).

Several of the mutual funds in Hobby Lobby’s retirement plan have holdings in companies that manufacture the specific drugs and devices that the Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, is fighting to keep out of Hobby Lobby’s health care policies: the emergency contraceptive pills Plan B and Ella, and copper and hormonal intrauterine devices.



So the company demands it not have to pay for any employee insurance that might purchase such things, but investing in their manufacture? Not a problem.

Oh, but it gets worse. The assertion from Sharia Lobby is that whether or not those contraceptives actually cause abortions, the company owners have a religious belief that they do, so the law must not only be rewritten to eliminate the possibility of the company spending money on abortifacients but rewritten to allow the company to deny insurance for anything that the company feels is an abortifacient. What’s still all right, at least from the investor side of things, is actual abortions.


The companies Hobby Lobby invests in include Teva [...], as well as Pfizer, the maker of the abortion-inducing drugs Cytotec and Prostin E2. Hobby Lobby’s mutual funds also invest in two health insurance companies that cover surgical abortions, abortion drugs, and emergency contraception in their health care policies.



So providing workers with health insurance that might provide certain contraceptives is right out, but making a little dough from companies that make actual abortion drugs does not run afoul of those self-same Deeply Held Religious Beliefs, nor investing in the very insurance companies whose original naughtiness was the thing Hobby Horse could not put up with.


I think we all understand each other here. Businesses must be able to lodge religious objections to the medical decisions of their employees, but don’t be surprised if that happens to be the one and only Deeply Held Religious Belief a given company might have. And we won’t even get into the Made In China part.




Daily Kos



Hobby Lobby invests in contraceptive, abortion drug manufacturers

Louisiana House passes sweeping abortion restrictions in the name of women’s “safety”

The state seems poised to pass Texas-style restrictions that will likely shutter clinics, opponents say




    








Salon.com



Louisiana House passes sweeping abortion restrictions in the name of women’s “safety”

Hobby Lobby invests in contraceptive, abortion drug manufacturers


20% off hypocritical blowhards, just bring this coupon


It’s peculiar how a group of individuals who are so devoted to their religious beliefs that they demand the very laws of the nation be rewritten to accommodate them can be so lax about those same religious beliefs if ignoring them will net them a little dough.

Documents filed with the Department of Labor and dated December 2012—three months after the company’s owners filed their lawsuit—show that the Hobby Lobby 401(k) employee retirement plan held more than $ 73 million in mutual funds with investments in companies that produce emergency contraceptive pills, intrauterine devices, and drugs commonly used in abortions. Hobby Lobby makes large matching contributions to this company-sponsored 401(k).

Several of the mutual funds in Hobby Lobby’s retirement plan have holdings in companies that manufacture the specific drugs and devices that the Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, is fighting to keep out of Hobby Lobby’s health care policies: the emergency contraceptive pills Plan B and Ella, and copper and hormonal intrauterine devices.



So the company demands it not have to pay for any employee insurance that might purchase such things, but investing in their manufacture? Not a problem.

Oh, but it gets worse. The assertion from Sharia Lobby is that whether or not those contraceptives actually cause abortions, the company owners have a religious belief that they do, so the law must not only be rewritten to eliminate the possibility of the company spending money on abortifacients but rewritten to allow the company to deny insurance for anything that the company feels is an abortifacient. What’s still all right, at least from the investor side of things, is actual abortions.


The companies Hobby Lobby invests in include Teva [...], as well as Pfizer, the maker of the abortion-inducing drugs Cytotec and Prostin E2. Hobby Lobby’s mutual funds also invest in two health insurance companies that cover surgical abortions, abortion drugs, and emergency contraception in their health care policies.



So providing workers with health insurance that might provide certain contraceptives is right out, but making a little dough from companies that make actual abortion drugs does not run afoul of those self-same Deeply Held Religious Beliefs, nor investing in the very insurance companies whose original naughtiness was the thing Hobby Horse could not put up with.


I think we all understand each other here. Businesses must be able to lodge religious objections to the medical decisions of their employees, but don’t be surprised if that happens to be the one and only Deeply Held Religious Belief a given company might have. And we won’t even get into the Made In China part.




Daily Kos



Hobby Lobby invests in contraceptive, abortion drug manufacturers

Saturday, March 29, 2014

"Pro-Life" West Virginia Gov. Tomblin Vetoes 20-Week Abortion Restriction

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



"Pro-Life" West Virginia Gov. Tomblin Vetoes 20-Week Abortion Restriction

Monday, March 24, 2014

Calif. Professor Charged in Clash With Teen Abortion Protester

A feminist studies associate professor at the University of California-Santa Barbara is facing criminal charges, accused of stealing a sign from an anti-abortion protester on campus and then physically attacking the teenager in an incident that was captured on a cellphone video.

Mireille Miller-Young, an associate professor, was charged with misdemeanor counts of theft, battery, and vandalism, accused of  accosting 16-year-old Thrin Short. She is scheduled to be arraigned on April 4.


Short and her older sister, Joan, 21, were among a group distributing pamphlets for the nonprofit, anti-abortion group Survivors of the Abortion Holocaust in a free speech zone on campus on March 4 when Miller-Young became disruptive.


Story continues below video.


“Before she grabbed the sign, she was mocking me and talking over me in front of the students, saying that she was twice as old as me and had three degrees, so they should listen to her and not me,” Short wrote in an email to FoxNews.com. “Then she started the chant with the students about ‘tear down the sign.’ When that died out, she grabbed the sign.”


The Short sisters and two other UC-Santa Barbara students followed Miller-Young, who specializes in and teaches courses on pornography, as she made off with the sign and tried to recover their property. After walking through an outdoor corridor and into a building, Miller-Young attempted to board an elevator with the sign. When Thrin Short blocked the elevator door from closing with her foot, Miller-Young “pushed and grabbed at the girl.”


“She then got off the elevator and tried to pull me away from the elevator doors so the others could get away with the sign,” Short wrote in her email to FoxNews.


Thrin Short, who suffered scratches on both wrists during the incident, captured much of the confrontation on video with her cellphone and has posted it on YouTube. She said campus police are now reviewing the video.


According to the Santa Barbara Independent, Miller-Young suggested in her interview with police that the activists had violated her rights by displaying upsetting imagery at her place of work and that she believed she had a “moral right” to take down the sign. She added that she is pregnant and was “triggered” by the graphic nature of the imagery on the sign.


It has not yet been determined whether Miller-Young faces any punishment from UC-Santa Barbara. A school spokesman declined to comment on personnel matters, per policy, but acknowledged the university was aware of the incident and said, “It is being reviewed by the appropriate offices.”


William Short, father of the two young activists, said Miller-Young went about her objection in the wrong way and that he hopes the impending legal proceeding will set a better example than she did.


“She was free to engage in a rational dialogue with them. Instead, she chose to bully them, steal and destroy their property, and hit and scratch my daughter,” Short told FoxNews. “After doing so, she said she thought she was setting a good example for her students. I think the goal of this prosecution should be to set a good example for her students, one that will not only deter her from repeating this conduct, but will also deter those who approve of her actions from imitating her appalling behavior.”


Related Stories:


© 2014 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Calif. Professor Charged in Clash With Teen Abortion Protester

Monday, March 10, 2014

The GOP"s Other War on Women: 5 Gender Battlegrounds Beyond Abortion and Contraception



Women care about more than birth control. From guns to poverty, here"s why the party is doomed.








Republicans are having a tough time shaking the “war on women” label, probably because they can’t stop themselves from sounding — and voting — like a bunch of raging misogynists. But when they do try to deflect this particular brand of sexism, it usually goes something like, “[Women are] more than just a set of reproductive organs, and I’d like someone to talk to me about how they’ll help my pocketbook and keep my health care plan that I like.”


Despite evidence to suggest that plenty of Republicans very much view women as a set of reproductive organs, this is verbatim what a Republican strategist told the New York Times last week in an attempt to challenge the idea that the GOP is a party of caveman bigots. It’s also what Mike Huckabee tried to communicate when he argued that the GOP opposes insurance coverage for contraception because it trusts that women can “control their libidos.” Rand Paul — a man who a majority of conservative tastemakers believe should be the next president — views the GOP’s problem with women as something of a nonstarter, mainly because there are lots of them enrolled in his niece’s veterinary program.


And you can be sure that this is the message that the organizers of CPAC were shooting for with a panel called, “Why Conservatism is Right for Women: How Conservatives Should Talk About Life, Prosperity & National Security.” (Undercutting their pro-woman rhetoric was the fact that the conference only featured a handful of women speakers on the main stage, and the organizers’ decision to go heavy on outdated cartoon villains like Sarah Palin and Ann Coulter rather than relevant conservatives like New Mexico Gov. Susana Martinez.)


The Republican-led assault on basic medical care has had devastating consequences for women, transgender men and gender non-conforming people who need safe, reliable access to abortion, and there’s no doubt that it’s a losing issue with the voters that the party is ostensibly courting. But what changes when you “look beyond” reproductive health issues like contraception, abortion and access to maternal and prenatal care? Precisely nothing. The GOP remains, as ever, a party that appeals largely to white men and married white women while falling further out of step with everyone else. While spitting vitriol about reproductive healthcare certainly alienates women voters and their allies, being vindictive about poverty, civil rights and other issues virtually annihilates the GOP’s chances of expanding its base.



Below, some of the battles in the GOP’s assault on women that don’t have to do with contraception or reproductive healthcare (though let’s be real, these issues are all connected):


Poverty.One in 3 women are living in or on the verge of poverty — nationwide, that’s 42 million women and 28 million children who depend on them. Black and Latina women face particularly high rates of poverty, and trans women — particularly trans women of color — are also disproportionally likely to live in poverty at some point in their lifetimes. So it seems pretty obvious that women would be paying attention when Republicans (aided in many cases by Democrats) slash food assistance programs at a time of record need.


Congress voted in February to cut $ 9 billion from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program over the next ten years, just two months after $ 11 billion had already been slashed from the program when a 2009 benefits increase expired. These reductions have cost families an average of $ 90 each month, a heavy hit for those already struggling to keep food on the table.


As Salon’s Blake Zeff noted just before the cuts passed in February, what was hailed by lawmakers as a shining example of bipartisan compromise was actually just a measure that will “make hungry people hungrier at a time of rampant poverty.”


And managing on less often means women will be going without. “What we find in our research is that when someone is going to have to do without, it’s usually women,” Lindsey Spindle, a communications officer at an anti-hunger nonprofit recently told Glamour. “They sacrifice their meals for their children, for their spouse, for their parents. So what we’re anticipating with these cuts is that families will be left vulnerable, but women in particular will do a lot to shield their families.”


Republican indifference to the millions of women facing food insecurity becomes that much more striking when you consider that the $ 9 billion in cuts in the final bill was a dramatic reduction from the outrageous $ 40 billion House Republicans originally demanded.


Women’s views on poverty and social services aren’t any great secret, either. A recent poll revealed that 56 percent of women surveyed “disapproved” or “strongly disapproved” of gutting food assistance programs at a moment when people need them more than ever.


Voting rights. Women care about voting rights because women vote. More than men, actually.


As Reid Wilson at the Washington Post recently pointed out, women are statistically more likely than men to not have a form of accepted identification at the polls. Low-income women may struggle to obtain the necessary ID because accessing birth records and other documentation can be costly and out of reach for many. Women over the age of 65 — who outnumber men over the age of 65 — are also less likely to have a form of identification required by these new laws. Women are also more likely than men to be enrolled in college, and students who attend out of state universities are disproportionately impacted by voter ID laws.


These laws threaten the votes of married women who may have changed or hyphenated their names. They jeopardize the rights of trans women, who can face several obstacles while trying to obtain an ID that reflects their name and gender. Voter ID laws are, generally speaking, bad for women.


But voter suppression efforts are, generally speaking, good for Republicans.


The fact that these laws disenfranchise women voters seems to be part of the point, and the GOP seems to know this. As Imani Gandy at RH Reality Check notes, women of color — particularly black and Latina women — have long been and continue to be crucial voting forces, particularly in contentious elections, both nationally and in states like Virginia.


As Gandy points outs, if black women had stayed home in 2012 (or disenfranchised through bogus voter ID requirements), “We would be face-palming our way through a Mitt Romney presidency right now.”


Work. Two out of every 3 minimum wage workers is a woman, and many of those women are also mothers or the primary caregivers in their households. Despite widespread support across gender and party lines, Republican lawmakers almost uniformly oppose a modest raise to the minimum wage, making the party’s appeals to women’s “pocketbooks” particularly laughable.


Raising the federal minimum wage from $ 7.25 to a meager $ 10.10 an hour would boost earnings for 28 million workers, and would help lift millions of women out of poverty. More than 25 percent of low-wage and low-income workers are single mothers, but at the current minimum wage, a woman who works full-time can expect to make an average of $ 14,500 each year. That’s $ 4,000 dollars less than the poverty level for a mother of two children.


Republican intransigence on equal pay measures is — surprise — also wildly out of step with voters.


Women, on average, still make 77 cents for every dollar earned by a man. The gap is even more drastic for women of color; black women make an average of 64 cents on the dollar, while Latina women make an average of 55 cents. A recent study from the Williams Institute also revealed that trans women face up to a 30 percent drop in wages following their gender transition.


Almost across the board, women’s earnings have stalled for much of the last two decades, and Republican opposition to equal pay legislation means they can expect more of the same in coming decades. As New York Democrat Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand remarked on the 50th anniversary of the Equal Pay Act, “If you’re not paying a woman dollar for dollar for the exact same work, you’re not really tapping the full potential of the economy.” You’re also, it seems, bound to hemorrhage all but a narrow segment of women voters. Whoops.


And yet Bobby Jindal called raising the minimum wage “waving the white flag of surrender” on the economy, and Rand Paul thinks women are doing just fine making poverty wages for full-time work. “I think some of the victimology and all this other stuff is trumped up,” Paul said recently when asked about women’s status in 2014. “And we don’t get to any good policy by playing some charade that one party doesn’t care about women or one party isn’t in favor of women advancing or other people advancing.”


Guns. This time last year, Gayle Trotter, a senior fellow at the Independent Women’s Forum, became something of a conservative celebrity when she testified at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on gun violence that “guns make women safer.” Trotter celebrated what she called the power of “scary-looking guns” to help women defend themselves against “hardened violent criminals.”


As I argued at the time, Trotter’s views on women and guns are not based in reality.


According to recent data, more than 60 percent of women killed by a firearm in 2010 were murdered by a current or former intimate partner, many of whom are able to keep their guns despite their violent records because of weak laws and even weaker enforcement. And far from protecting women, the presence of a firearm during a domestic violence incident increases the likelihood of a homicide by a staggering 500 percent.


Women — along with most other people in America — overwhelmingly support the kind of gun reform that Republican lawmakers oppose.



A poll released earlier this month by NBC News and the Wall Street Journal found that 55 percent of Americans support tougher gun measures, and that 65 percent of women support such reforms. “It’s easily one of the largest policy gender gaps we’ve seen in years,” researchers said of the findings.


This kind of gap should give the GOP pause the next time it blocks modest reforms to gun laws, but, if history is any indicator, it won’t.


LGBTQ rights.The recent Republican fight in Arizona and elsewhere in the country to let private companies discriminate against LGBTQ people puts them out of step with even moderates in the GOP, but it puts them even further out of step with LGBTQ women voters and their allies.



But it’s not just about Arizona. Despite widespread support for the Employer Non-Discrimination Act, House Speaker John Boehner has said that he sees “no basis or need” for the legislation to protect workers from discrimination based on sexual or gender identity. The measure passed in the Senate, but has yet to come to a vote in the House because of Republican opposition to the measure.


Republicans are equally out of step with a majority of Americans when it comes to marriage equality. Equal marriage has more or less ceased to be a controversial issue for most Americans, with a historic majority now favoring it. But you wouldn’t know this by listening to the Republican leadership. Conservative lawmakers — at the state and federal level — continue to fight tooth and nail to resist momentum behind equal marriage.


Conservative lawmakers — with the support of virulently anti-LGBTQ groups — have also advanced measures in states like California to roll back basic protections for transgender young people. And it is, of course, a Republican lobbyist who is currently working on a bill to ban openly gay players from the NFL.


Members of the GOP may continue to take etiquette classes and eventually get better about not calling women “hosts” for a fetus or describing female candidates as “empty dresses,” but no amount of reform school will change the fundamentals of the party’s platform.


The GOP is wrong about most things, but they’re right when they say that women care about more than just birth control. What they don’t seem to realize is that this is precisely the reason they have lost women voters.



 


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



The GOP"s Other War on Women: 5 Gender Battlegrounds Beyond Abortion and Contraception

Friday, January 24, 2014

MSNBC Guest: People Oppose Abortion Because "Their Sex Lives Are So Miserable"


RELATED: Coulter Rips MSNBC’s Conservatives, Praises Fox’s ‘Not Stupid’ Liberals: ‘It’s a Real Fight on Fox’
Politik Ditto



MSNBC Guest: People Oppose Abortion Because "Their Sex Lives Are So Miserable"

Pro-Abortion Activists Outnumbered in Abortion Standoff at the ‘March for Life’


If there really were a “war on women” there should have been a good number of female combatants on the national mall Wednesday to protest against the March for Life, the largest annual pro-life gathering in the country. However only about 20 women, all appearing to be under 25 years old, showed up to defend abortion Wednesday, in the face of tens of thousands of women who stood against it. Pictures Below:


The March for Life is not only the largest pro-life gathering but also the largest annual protest in the United States. Even in the midst of freezing temperatures, pro-life advocates estimate that hundreds of thousands of women, men, and children showed up. Years past estimates have put the number in the millions. 




While pro-life women carried signs like, “I regret my abortion,” “We are the pro-life generation,” and “Conceived from rape: I love my life;” the 20  pro-choice women carried such classy signs like, “Get your politics out of my pussy,”  “I am not an incubator,” and “Dr. George Tiller is my hero,” and identified with the feminist National Organization of Women (NOW).






March president, Jeanne Monahan, said at the rally beforehand that there wasn’t a “war on women” in this country, but a “war on motherhood.” By looking at these young women holding signs that glorify abortion doctors and treat children as diseases, it’s not hard to agree with Monahan’s assessment.



— Kristine Marsh is Staff Writer at the Media Research Center. Follow Kristine Marsh on Twitter.




NewsBusters – Exposing Liberal Media Bias



Pro-Abortion Activists Outnumbered in Abortion Standoff at the ‘March for Life’

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

US supreme court justices appear skeptical of abortion clinic buffer zones


Dan Roberts
theguardian.com
January 15, 2014


US supreme court justices appear sceptical of abortion clinic buffer zones


Court’s conservatives may be ready to strike down Massachusetts abortion clinic buffer zone law on free speech grounds


The battle lines of America’s culture wars threatened to draw closer on Wednesday, as the supreme court questioned the constitutionality of buffer zones designed to keep pro-life activists away from abortion clinics.


Though a final decision will not be reached for several months, a narrow majority of justices on the court, which is dominated by a conservative bloc, appeared sympathetic to free speech arguments against at least parts of the Massachusetts law.


“The government doesn’t get to decide what is said on the public pavement,” said Mark Rienzi, the lawyer representing the pro-life activists who brought the case.


Read more


This article was posted: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 2:51 pm










Infowars



US supreme court justices appear skeptical of abortion clinic buffer zones

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

From RealClearPolitics: Obamacare Enrollees; Fox News and The White House; Pope Discusses Abortion;


Good morning. It’s Tuesday, January 14, 2014. Congress came back in session with a bang, as a group of bipartisan, bicameral congressional negotiators produced a 1,582-page budget blueprint last night that is expected to pass both the House and the Senate.


The $ 1.1 trillion spending bill restores some cuts to social programs such as Head Start, gives federal workers a paltry 1 percent raise, and keeps the government running through the end of Major League Baseball’s regular season. (And they wouldn’t shut the government during the World Series, would they?)


Speaking of which, the National League team in Barack Obama’s adopted hometown of Chicago has unveiled a new Cubs mascot to scathing reviews. The White House has not yet commented. Meanwhile, the president’s schedule includes lunch with Joe Biden, hosting the 2013 NBA champion Miami Heat in the East Room and meeting early this evening with Maria Shriver to discuss her report on the status of women in America.


As far as tomorrow goes, the president is heading to North Carolina. In his absence RCP is hosting a noon event at the Newseum focusing on America’s energy future with Sen. Joe Manchin as the keynoter. (If you wish to attend, clickhere to RSVP.)


Today’s date is a signature day in the history of television. Sixty-two years ago today, the incomparable Dave Garroway opened a live broadcast from New York City with the words “Well, here we are.”


Sporting a huge lavalier microphone around his neck, he got up from behind his desk and walked around the studio and said, “Good morning to you–the very first good morning of what I hope and suspect will be a great many good mornings between you and I. Here it is—January 14, 1952, when NBC begins a new program called ‘Today.’ And if it doesn’t sound too revolutionary, I really believe this begins a new kind of television.”


And so it did. I’ll have more on the Today Show and Dave Garroway’s influence on the medium in a moment. First, I’d point you to our front page, where we aggregate an array of stories and columns spanning the political spectrum. We also offer a full complement of original material from RCP’s own reporters and contributors, including:


* * *


Top 10 Lawmakers on Energy. As part of RCP’s weeklong focus on the issue, Caitlin Huey-Burns and Tim Hains collaborated on this slide show.


Just 24 Percent of ACA Enrollees Are Under 35. Alexis Simendinger reports on the data, released yesterday, which show a sign-up trend skewing older than hoped for.


A Second Look at Medicaid Enrollment Numbers. Sean Trende revisits the figures he explored last week, only this time using more precise — and revealing — data supplied by one state.


Christie Faces Tall Task in Reasserting Agenda. Amid fallout from last week’s “Bridgegate” revelations, the New Jersey governor will try to change the subject with his state-of-the-state address today. Scott Conroy has a preview.


Brett Baier on Fox News’ Relationship With the White House. Check out the latest installment of “RCP’s Morning Commute.”


Poll: 23 Percent Say U.S. Headed in Right Direction. Adam O’Neal has thenumbers.


Pope Ratchets Up Rhetoric on Abortion. Adam reports on the pontiff’s surprisingly strong words on the subject Monday in his State of the World address.


N.Y. Congressman to Wed Same-Sex Partner. Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York is engaged to be married. Adam has the details.


Human Rights Buried Under $ 51 Billion Sochi Games. Mark Cunningham wonderswhether the international community will turn a blind eye next month to Russia’s oppression.


* * *


With his bow tie, horn-rimmed glasses, and everyman looks, Dave Garroway was perhaps an unlikely television star. His secret was his amiable manner and preternatural calmness—on live television, no less, amid a clattering newsroom—and his love of the subject material, whatever that happened to be.


TV critic Tom Shales has ruminated that the early television performers and producers were creators in the truest sense of the word. “Inventing TV—the machine—was not that hard,” he wrote. “Dave Garroway helped invent what you put on it once you’ve got it.”


When Garroway died by his own hand in 1982, Shales penned a poignant obituary. “Dave Garroway was very important to television,” he wrote. “If this were theater we were talking about, his death would be like all the Barrymores dying at once; everyone who’s come after him has owed him something.”


At the NBC studios in New York, they know this. Two years ago, on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of “Today,” they paid him due homage.


“Dave Garroway was a master communicator,” said Al Roker. “He could talk to people. He, in a sense, was a showman. You know, the ‘window’ was his ring.”


“I grew up with Dave Garroway; it was a revelation,” added Tom Brokaw. “I lived in such a remote part of the country that we didn’t get television until 1955, and for that to come into our living room—I was going off to school, my mother to work—and we would sit and watch Dave Garroway, who was a maestro at what he was able to do.”


This was a maestro whose cast in the early years included a pet chimpanzee who frequently bit Garroway and was eventually eased off the show. At first, television writers didn’t know what to make of the mishmash of news and entertainment, but the show made money for the network, and Garroway’s relaxed work won over the critics.


“He does not crash into the home with the false jollity and thunderous witticisms of a backslapper,” New York Times critic Richard F. Shepard wrote in 1960. “He is pleasant, serious, scholarly looking and not obtrusively convivial.”


Garroway’s trademark was signing off by saying, “Peace,” while extending the palm of his hand. After this term became devalued by overuse in the political tumult of the times, he switched to “Courage,” something adopted years later by CBS anchorman Dan Rather.


In those early days of live television, Dave Garroway’s official title wasn’t “anchorman” or “host.” It was “communicator,” and it couldn’t have been more apt.


‘”He could look at the camera,” said Barbara Walters, who was hired by Garroway, “and make you feel he was talking only with you.”


Carl M. Cannon
Washington Bureau Chief
RealClearPolitics
Twitter: @CarlCannon


We update throughout the day at www.realclearpolitics.com. If you no longer wish to receive this morning missive, please type “unsubscribe” in the subject line and hit “reply” to this message.




RealClearPolitics – Articles



From RealClearPolitics: Obamacare Enrollees; Fox News and The White House; Pope Discusses Abortion;

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Who Suffers When States Decide To Cut Off Legal Abortion At 20 Weeks? The Young And Poor

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Who Suffers When States Decide To Cut Off Legal Abortion At 20 Weeks? The Young And Poor

Monday, November 11, 2013

“Mandatory” Abortion Advocated by White House Ally


Photo by Yskin/flickr

Photo by Yskin/flickr



As if the radical left’s knee-jerk support for abortion in almost any conceivable circumstance is not reprehensible enough, one prominent speaker recently advocating making the murderous act mandatory.


Appearing as part of a panel on a current affairs program in Australia, author and gay activist Dan Savage offered some deeply disturbing views while taking questions from the audience.


“Which so-called dangerous idea do you each think would have the greatest potential to change the world for the better if it were implemented?” one woman asked. With little hesitation, Savage chimed in his belief children should be snatched out of the womb and murdered without even consulting the mothers carrying them.


“There’s too many [expletive deleted] people on the planet,” he exclaimed, adding that “in my darker moments I’m anti-choice.”


His definition of the term does not mean he wants to curtail abortion, however. In fact, he advocates for the polar opposite outcome.


“I think abortion should be mandatory for about 30 years,” he continued.


Obviously, his heartless and outrageous comments caused plenty of discussion; and Savage has been roundly criticized for his position. As someone who builds his own brand by making the most outlandish statements imaginable, though, he is likely thrilled with the attention.


While his expression of such views is troubling on its own, the Obama administration’s apparent support of his offensive mission is far more disconcerting.


Despite the fact this profane monster is one of the biggest bullies in today’s marketplace of ideas, the White House infamously helped Savage raise funds “It Gets Better,” a purported anti-bullying campaign geared toward homosexuals.


Though he is adamant about protecting the feelings of those who share his sexual perversion, Savage has no qualms about trampling on those with whom he disagrees.


In the same televised appearance, he blamed Family Research Council President Tony Perkins for the suicide deaths of homosexuals.


Claiming Perkins “sits on a pile of dead kids every day when he goes to work,” Savage said he doesn’t “understand how real Christians let that little [expletive deleted] get away with that.”


Once again, the leftists in today’s deeply damaged culture contend only conservatives should be silenced when presenting ostensibly controversial views. Liberal bullies, on the other hand, deserve a presidential fundraiser.


–B. Christopher Agee


Have an idea for a story? Email us at tips@westernjournalism.com



“Loophole” from Obama’s IRS: Protect your IRA or 401(k) with gold and silver… click here to get a NO-COST Info Guide >

Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.




Western Journalism



“Mandatory” Abortion Advocated by White House Ally

Sunday, November 3, 2013

Lindsey Graham to Introduce 20-Week Abortion Ban


Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) plans to lead Senate Republicans in a push for a federal ban on abortions after the end of the 20th week of pregnancy.


The measure is a companion to the House-passed Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act that was led by Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ).


“Science tells us that unborn babies can feel touch as soon as eight weeks into the pregnancy; they feel pain at 20 weeks,” said Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), leading the debate on the floor of the House.


According to the Washington Examiner, Republican aides in both chambers of Congress confirmed that Graham is the lead sponsor of the Senate bill and will introduce the measure in the coming week.


Concerns among Republican senators about the proposal have included one from pro-life Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), who said thought should be given regarding the constitutionality of invoking Congress’ authority to regulate commerce as the basis for the legislation. President Obama’s attorneys invoked the same constitutional provision to defend ObamaCare’s individual mandate.


The Supreme Court upheld a partial-birth abortion ban rooted in the Commerce Clause in 2003. Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia, however, emphasized in a concurring opinion that “the court’s abortion jurisprudence… has no basis in the Constitution.”


The justices added that “whether the Act constitutes a permissible exercise of Congress’ power under the Commerce Clause is not before the Court.”


Recently, liberal Constitutional attorney Alan Dershowitz said there has never been any constitutional right to abortion in the Constitution.


By introducing a measure such as an abortion ban, Graham may be hoping to bolster his effort to keep primary challengers at bay.


As Breitbart News’ Michael Patrick Leahy reported in July, Graham is being challenged in the 2014 South Carolina Republican primary:


Tea Party groups across the state unanimously oppose Graham. They view him as a RINO who does not support the constitutionally limited government values of the movement. However, to date they have not coalesced around a single challenger.







    








Breitbart Feed



Lindsey Graham to Introduce 20-Week Abortion Ban

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Texas Women Turned Away at Abortion Clinics after Court Ruling

Women seeking to terminate their pregnancies were turned away at clinics across Texas on Friday, providers said, after strict new regulations for physicians who perform abortions prompted a dozen facilities to stop offering them.

Facilities that continue to perform abortions were flooded with calls from women trying to find alternatives, clinic officials said.


“They’re calling from all over – Fort Worth, West Texas, all over Dallas, Oklahoma, everywhere,” said Betty Pettigrew, director at Routh Street Women’s Clinic in downtown Dallas, which has offered abortion services since 1978.


Offices were inundated with calls after a federal appeals court ruled on Thursday that a provision of a new Texas law that requires all doctors performing abortions to have an agreement with a local hospital to admit patients could go into immediate effect.


The provision was part of a sweeping anti-abortion law, passed in July by the Republican-led Texas Legislature, that also requires abortion clinics to meet heightened building standards, bans abortion after 20 weeks and requires strict adherence to federal guidelines in prescribing the so-called abortion pill.


Hours after the decision from the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, managers or employees of 12 clinics from El Paso to Dallas to the Rio Grande Valley said their facilities would either drastically reduce the number of procedures, or stop providing abortions altogether.


Opponents had warned before the court decision that abortion services at nearly one-third of the state’s 32 clinics and an additional half dozen ambulatory centers that also offer the procedure could immediately halt as soon as the law went into effect because many doctors have not been able to gain admitting privileges.


“Unfortunately, we are having to close today and tomorrow, but we will be open next week seeing patients as normal,” said Tenesha Duncan, administrator at Southwestern Women’s Surgery Center in Dallas. The doctor on duty Friday and Saturday does not have admitting privileges, she said.


Anti-abortion groups who support that law questioned why some clinics had been able to meet the new requirements and not others. They said the requirement that doctors performing abortions have admitting privileges was enacted to enhance safety for women.


“We have to make sure that abortions are done in a manner which is consistent with accepted safety standards,” said Joe Pojmann of the Texas Alliance for Life in Austin.


Some 45 women were denied their previously scheduled abortions at Whole Woman’s Health clinics in Fort Worth, San Antonio and McAllen, Texas, on Friday, said Amy Hagstrom Miller, chief executive officer and founder of Whole Woman’s Health, which operates four clinics and one ambulatory surgery center in Texas.


“They were all in tears,” Miller said. Some of Whole Woman’s clinics are open for now because they still must do required follow-up appointments for women who have already had abortions.


Two of that network’s facilities will have to shut down completely in a matter of weeks – staff let go, buildings sold – if they cannot gain admitting privileges because abortions comprise 90 percent of their services and the company cannot afford to run those offices without that revenue, Miller said.


“We specialize in abortion care because in most communities, there are plenty of family planning and ob-gyn services, and it’s really abortion care that’s underserved,” she said.


The group’s clinic in San Antonio, which is currently open five days a week, will have to reduce its hours to once or twice a month because the only physician with admitting privileges at that facility lives on the East Coast and is flown in for procedures, Miller said.


Harlingen Reproductive Services in South Texas halted abortions but remained open for other women’s health services, said Angie Tristan, clinic administrator said.


At Reproductive Services in El Paso, officials are hopeful that they can soon gain admitting privileges for its physician.


“We hope to be back up and running with abortion services next week,” administrator Gerri Laster told Reuters.


Some of the clinics that are closing or discontinuing the procedure may resume if their doctors can gain admitting privileges, clinic officials cautioned, though many hospitals are reluctant to do so for religious or business reasons.


No clinic had reported any official closings to the Texas Department of State Health Services, which tracks licensed abortion facilities, by Friday, said agency spokeswoman Carrie Williams.


© 2013 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Texas Women Turned Away at Abortion Clinics after Court Ruling

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Leftists Who Cheered Abortion Filibuster Slam Ted Cruz


Killing babies “heroic,” opposing Obamacare offensive


Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
September 25, 2013


While cheering a 10 hour speech by Democratic state Senator Wendy Davis that succeeded in blocking a Texas bill that would have banned abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy as “the filibuster heard around the world,” leftists have displayed little else but contempt towards Ted Cruz’s marathon stand against Obamacare.



The Huffington Post characterized Cruz’s quasi-filibuster against Obamacare, a sentiment shared by most Americans, as a “hijack” of the Senate, a somewhat different tone to how they reported Davis’ opposition to a policy that was not shared by the majority of Texans.


Democratic Congressman Mark Takano also tweeted his view that Davis’ success in ensuring babies were killed after the 5th month was “the greatest filibuster of all time!”


The Daily Kos’ Markos Moulitsas scorned Cruz while labeling Wendy Davis’ tirade a “heroic effort”.


Other Twitter users drew attention to the left’s hypocritical disdain for (quasi) filibusters.


However, it’s not just leftists who attacked Cruz. Some faux conservatives fell in line with RINO Republicans to lambaste the Texas Senator, including the Daily Caller’s Jamie Weinstein, who penned a sophomoric piece which served to communicate the message that his attempt to sink Obamacare was doomed to failure.


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


This article was posted: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 at 6:03 am


Tags: , ,










Infowars



Leftists Who Cheered Abortion Filibuster Slam Ted Cruz