Showing posts with label Worth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Worth. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

Iraq 10 Years Later - Was it Worth It?

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Iraq 10 Years Later - Was it Worth It?

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Here"s At Least 260,000 Reasons Why College Isn"t Worth It

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Here"s At Least 260,000 Reasons Why College Isn"t Worth It

Monday, March 31, 2014

Is Single-Serving Coffee Really Worth All the Mindless Waste It Creates?



Nearly 1 in 5 coffee drinkers is too lazy to make coffee, and those little serving pods they discard add up.









I know I shouldn’t be, but I am shocked by Americans’ laziness.


We look for the closest parking spot to the gym so that we don’t have to walk those extra few steps. We indulge in watching more cooking shows, yet actually cook less than ever. We invented the drive-thru.


Now, nearly one in five American coffee drinkers is too lazy to make coffee.


There are foods that are very complex and difficult to make. Coffee isn’t one of them. I understand why someone wouldn’t want to make homemade butter or those little French macarons. I get why my mom only made her cheese blintzes for very special occasions. That stuff takes work.


I dread my annual tomato sauce canning marathon, and I only do it because the amazing sauce that results makes easy, delicious meals all year long. And once I put all that work in, I don’t share my sauce with just anyone.


But, coffee?


I make it several times a day. And I’m pretty lazy — I’ve been known to eat whole unpeeled carrots Bugs Bunny style to avoid cutting and cooking them. If I can make coffee, anyone can.


A traditional drip coffee maker requires a few steps. Add water. Measure coffee. Grind coffee. Add filter. Place grounds in filter. Press “on.” Wait. Your coffee is ready.


You can further reduce the required work by purchasing pre-ground coffee, or – better yet –getting a coffee grinder that does the measuring for you.


For lots of folks, that’s still too much work.


Nearly 20 percent of coffee drinkers now use coffee pods. With specialized coffee makers and compatible “pods” of individual serving sizes of pre-ground coffee, one reduces the task of making coffee to: Add water, insert pod, press start, throw pod away. Fancier machines also let you add milk to make various espresso drinks.


These newfangled coffeemakers don’t come cheap. A Keurig will run you $ 80 or more, and Nespresso makers start at $ 149. Once you’re invested, you have to buy the related brand of pods — K-cups for Green Mountain Coffee’s Keurig or Nestle’s Nespresso. That alone would be my deal-breaker, because I don’t like either brand of coffee.


In their defense, Keurig offers a refillable pod for $ 15 (the price of my entire coffee maker) so you can add your preferred type of coffee. Which puts the onerous work of measuring and grinding back into your coffee-making process.


While it’s easy to make fun of Americans’ drive to save time in the kitchen, there’s nothing inherently wrong with it. In fact, sometimes time-saving steps constitute efficiency and ingenuity, not laziness. But in this case, the new pod systems result in a staggering amount of waste and may potentially harm your health.


According to a recent Mother Jones article, all of the K-cups sold in 2013 could circle the earth 10.5 times. And every single one now resides in a landfill. Nespresso’s pods are aluminum. They have a program to collect and recycle used pods, but unless their customers actually take them up on this, it’s little more than good PR.


Then there are the health questions generated by making your coffee in little plastic pods (in the case of K-cups). The cups are made of #7 plastic, a catch-all category of “Other” plastics not included in numbers 1 through 6. Keurig refused to tell Mother Jones what type of plastic it used, or whether or not it contained possibly-carcinogenic styrene.


These new brewing systems are little more than a clever method a few companies have discovered to sell more of their own crappy coffee, without regard for the trash they create and their potential impacts on their customers’ health.


Let’s take the waste and potential health hazards out of our coffee. We don’t need to trash the planet just to get a morning buzz.



 


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Is Single-Serving Coffee Really Worth All the Mindless Waste It Creates?

Sunday, February 9, 2014

Sochi Cheat Sheet: 18 Olympians Worth Rooting For

Sochi Cheat Sheet: 18 Olympians Worth Rooting For
http://thedailynewsreport.com/files/Shiva%20Keshavan%20Indian%20Luge.jpeg


Yesterday, during slopestyle qualifiers at the Winter Olympics, Dutch snowboarder Cheryl Maas became the first Olympian to act in direct opposition of Russia’s bigoted anti-gay law when she stared into a television camera and shoved a rainbow-colored unicorn glove at the lens. In doing so, the defiant winter veteran—one of only six openly gay competitors in Sochi—carried on a long tradition of athletes injecting a little character and dissent into the Games, reminding us just why we love sports to begin with.


Considering the staggering tales of mismanagement, corruption, and regional terrorist threats, here are 17 more Olympians we’re hoping do the same:


THE FIVE OTHER OPENLY GAY ATHLETES



SSA TV/Youtube

Partly because of boycotts, and partly because of Russia’s anti-LGBT law, just five other gay athletes—all women—are joining Maas in openly competing in this year’s Games. Four of them—Ireen Wüst(a gold-medal-winning Dutch speed skater), Sanne van Kerkhof (a Dutch short-track speedskater), Barbara Jezeršek(a Slovenian cross-country skier), and Anatasia Bucsis (a Canadian speed skater) are also previous Olympians. For Belle Brockhoff, an Australian snowboarder who came out as gay specifically to protest the Russian law, Sochi is her first Olympic competition. In an interview with the BBC, she explained: “I want to go there because I’m not afraid of these laws and I want others that live in Russia, who are homosexuals, to see that.”


SHIVA KESHAVAN



Shiva Keshavan Indian Luger
Imago/Zuma


Last year, the Indian Olympic Association was suspended on allegations of corruption. As a result, none of India’s three Olympic athletes will be allowed to compete under the Indian flag in Sochi. But luger Shiva Keshavan is sliding anyway—and he’s doing so in a multicolored, patterned cap intended to represented his home village. Keshavan is no stranger to fighting the odds: At 16, became the youngest luger in history, and now competes without a coach or winter sports infrastructure. Despite Keshavan winning gold in the 2011 and 2012 Asia cups, acting IOA president Vijay Kumar Malhotra insists that the Indian winter athletes don’t stand a chance of winning. Still, this will be Keshavan’s fifth Olympiad—with or without his country’s official backing.


LANNY BARNES


Lanny Barnes
WBUR/Flickr


Perhaps this year’s quintessential Olympic tale of selflessness, Lanny and Tracy Barnes’ story will melt the icy cockles of your cynical heart. The twin sisters were both expected to qualify for Sochi, but during the final round of US biathlon qualifiers, Lanny fell too ill to compete and was forced to stay home. Tracy, though, made the cut. A week later, Tracy sacrificed her spot so Lanny could race instead. “Love is selfless dedication,” she explained in an interview. “Love means giving up your dream so somebody else can realize theirs.” Though they’re both Olympic veterans, Tracy’s withdrawal comes only four years after barely missing the 2010 Olympics.


NORWEGIAN CURLING TEAM


Norwegian Curling Team

In recent years, curling has seen an unexpected and surging growth in popularity. If you tuned in to the 2010 Vancouver Games, you might recall Norway’s amazing patterned pants during its silver-medal-winning performance. In Sochi, the team will don even more outrageous outfits: 1970s-inspired red, blue, and white zig-zag suits referencing the nation’s flag. Appreciation for the team’s loud sense of style even spawned a Facebook page with more than 540,000 fans—nearly as many people as live in Oslo.


YOHAN GOUTT GONCALVES


Yohan Goutt Goncalves
Yohan Goutt Goncalves/Wikimedia Commons


Goncalves is the first athlete to ever compete in the Winter Olympics for East Timor, a country that’s never seen snow. In fact, the country’s annual temperature stays around 85 degrees. Competing in the ski slalom, Goncalves wants to go to Sochi as a “diplomat” to show that there is “more to East Timor than war.” That’s more than we can say about his mariachi-suited slalom competitor.


JAMAICAN BOBSLED TEAM



Olympics/Youtube

Heading to the Winter Olympics for the first time in more than a decade, the Jamaican bobsled team has fans hoping for Cool Runnings 2.0. Jamaica’s inaugural bobsled run, in the 1988 Calgary Olympics, ended in a disastrous crash. Upon arriving in Sochi, the team was further hindered as a result of the airport temporarily losing the competitors’ clothes and equipment. Still, 12 years since their last appearance, and crowd-funded by more than $ 184,000, the two-man team is looking for redemption.


US WOMEN’S SKI JUMPING TEAM


Jessica Jerome Ski Jumping
Mht54321/Wikimedia Commons


2014 marks the first year women’s ski jumping will be an Olympic event, with advocacy by American Lindsay Van largely responsible for bringing it there. In an interview on Rock Center With Brian Williams, Van explained how sexism kept the event out of the Olympics for years. (In 2006, International Ski Federation President Gian Franco Kasper said, “It’s like jumping down from, let’s say, about two meters on the ground about a thousand times a year, which seems not to be appropriate for ladies from a medical point of view.”) Now, along with teammates Jessica Jerome and Sarah Hendrickson—a medal favorite who’s recovering from an ACL injury—Van finally will see her hard work come to fruition at the Olympics.
 




Politics | Mother Jones




Read more about Sochi Cheat Sheet: 18 Olympians Worth Rooting For and other interesting subjects concerning Politics at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, February 3, 2014

Spain"s "black" economy worth 25 percent of GDP


The black economy was worth €253 billion ($ 344 billion) in 2012, the report by Spanish tax office workers union Gestha shows.


That’s €60 billion higher than at the start of the crisis in 2008, and means the submerged economy was worth a whopping 24.6 percent of GDP in 2012.


In 2008, by contrast, this underground activity was valued at a still-high 17.8 percent of GDP.


The Gestha report ties the massive growth in Spain’s submerged economy to high levels of corruption, the lingering effects of the country’s building boom — which created a huge pool of black money — and massive unemployment.




BlackListedNews.com



Spain"s "black" economy worth 25 percent of GDP

Monday, December 2, 2013

Are Christmas parties really worth it?

Are Christmas parties really worth it?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/11/29/article-2515531-192D5ECB000005DC-491_634x313.jpg


By Andy Yates, Huddlebuy


|


The hangovers may only take a day or so to get rid of but eye-watering moments take far longer, so should your firm cancel Christmas? Andy Yates dons his novelty hat to take a look.


It is not just the wine that gets mulled over each year. The great Christmas party debate is agonized over annually by company bosses and entrepreneurs of all shapes and sizes across the land.


So, as the mistletoe gets hung, the bars get booked and the ill-fitting paper party hats get folded, let us ask ourselves: ‘Is all the effort really worth it?’.


Dancing? Ricky Gervais shows off his moves at The Office Christmas party

Dancing? Ricky Gervais shows off his moves at The Office Christmas party



First, the festive fun plus points.


Staff morale and a good company culture is vitally important to business success. In every business I work with, people remain the key to success, even though most of them are technology-based enterprises.


So I really understand why team building and bonding is so important. Letting your hair down could be a great way to avoid the hair-raising prospect of losing staff.



ANDY YATES



In our regular series Andy Yates explores the weird and wonderful world of business life. Yates is an experienced entrepreneur, adviser and mentor and investor-director at Huddlebuy.co.uk – Europe’s largest daily money-saving site for small businesses.




Christmas is also a great time to look back at what staff and the business have really achieved – and to really recognise these achievements.


And, of course, if the company has done well then so should the key members of the team who have busted a gut to get it there. The best businesses I have been involved in share financial success with the staff to spur them on to bigger and better things and to help ensure a really happy New Year.


In other words, I am not ‘Bah humbug’ about Christmas parties. Give me a sausage roll and a party blower any day.


But then of course, there are the downsides.


Christmas parties which turn into X-rated affairs between certain members of staff, wholly inappropriate gifts, radically different religious viewpoints, staff or colleagues who’ve had a few, telling you what they really think of you…


And, worst of all, break dancing in a dress. Was that really me (sorry, a flashback there, my staff never looked at me in quite the same way again after that)?


The cracking hangovers may only take a day or so to get over but those sort of David Brent moments usually take far more time.


But my real bug-bear about Christmas parties is that most employers think this annual social highlight is enough to keep employees happy – a few drinks at Christmas will make everything rosy again.


This is just stuff(ing) and nonsense. Staff need much more than that.


Bad Santa: A little too much festive cheer can go a very low way in the embarrassment stakes.

Bad Santa: A little too much festive cheer can go a very low way in the embarrassment stakes.



So, when the party season comes to an end, any business that wants its staff to continue to say ‘Ho Ho Ho’, rather than ‘No No No’ should put the following on its Christmas list:


  • Regular company and individual bonuses or rewards throughout the year to recognize the success of those hitting real and achievable targets and to motivate staff every month  – not just only when Christmas comes around.

  • Valuable, tangible, relevant and useful all-year-round employee perks – for example Huddlebuy, which I help to help businesses, has introduced a popular Gold Card for businesses and employees, offering discounts on anything from shopping to gym membership to Apple products.

  • Promote a culture of real ownership and responsibility so that employees are in control of their own targets and achievements based on clearly defined job descriptions, goals and objectives.

  • Regular and transparent communication and feedback to ensure employees understand how the business is going, the challenges and opportunities it faces and how they can really help and contribute.

  • Flexible working to enable valued employees to strike the right work-life balance

  • Setting clear career objectives and goals so that staff can see where they can go next and how to achieve it.

  • Regular team building and bonding time out of the office to really understand your team and colleagues.

I am not saying the festive party is not a good idea – but if you think that this is the be-all and end-all of improving staff morale, you must be crackers.


The moral of this Yuletide story? Happy staff are not just for Christmas.


Follow Andy on Twitter: @smallbizhelp


Follow Huddlebuy on Twitter: @huddlebuy


Special reader offer: Get a Huddlebuy Gold Card Free Trial – smarter savings for you and your business – guaranteed.







Money | Mail Online




Read more about Are Christmas parties really worth it? and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, November 29, 2013

Google Black Friday 2013 deals: a full cyber weekend"s worth


Google is taking part in today’s shopping festivities with deals on the Nexus 7, the Chromecast, and nearly 40 popular selections from the Play Store. From today through what Google’s calling the “Cyber Weekend,” the new Nexus 7 will come with a $ 25 credit for the Play Store, while the Chromecast will come with a $ 6 movie rental credit. Some of the most enticing deals are on games, music, and books though: Kanye West and Robin Thicke’s latest albums are both selling for only $ 1.99, Malcolm Gladwell and Dan Brown’s new books are both available for just under $ 4, and Need for Speed Most Wanted is selling for $ 1.99. You can check out the full selection below:


Gadgets


  • Nexus 7 (2013): $ 229 for 16GB, $ 269 for 32GB, both include $ 25 Google Play credit and free shipping

  • Chromecast: $ 35, includes free shipping and one movie rental of $ 6.00 or less

Games


  • Order & Chaos Online: $ 0.99

  • Choplifter HD: $ 0.99

  • Anodyne: $ 0.99

  • Skylanders Battlegrounds: $ 2.99

  • Need for Speed Most Wanted: $ 1.99

Books



  • David Baldacci’s The Hit: $ 2.49

  • Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game: $ 1.99

  • Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games Trilogy: $ 12.99

  • Dan Brown’s Inferno: $ 3.99

  • Veronica Roth’s Allegiant: $ 3.49

  • E L James’ 50 Shades Trilogy: $ 7.49

  • Joe Hill’s NOS4A2: $ 3.29

  • Malcolm Gladwell’s David and Goliath: $ 3.79

Music


  • Kanye West’s Yeezus: $ 1.99

  • Eminem’s The Marshall Mathers LP2: $ 4.99

  • Avenged Sevenfold’s Hail to the King: $ 3.99

  • Robin Thicke’s Blurred Lines: $ 1.99

  • Avicii’s True: $ 1.99

  • Fall Out Boy’s Save Rock and Roll: $ 1.99

  • Luke Bryan’s Crash My Party: $ 3.99

  • Darius Rucker’s True Believers:  $ 1.99

Movies



  • Prometheus: $ 7.99

  • Pacific Rim: $ 3.99

  • The Vow: $ 5.99

  • 42: $ 3.99

  • Pain and Gain: $ 4.99

  • The Hangover Part III: $ 3.99

  • We Bought a Zoo: $ 7.99

  • The Great Gatsby: $ 3.99

TV Series



  • It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, season 1: $ 5.99; most other seasons for $ 14.99

  • Scandal, season 1: $ 9.99; season 2: $ 14.99

  • Eleven of this year’s Shark Week specials: $ 9.99

  • Defiance, season 1: $ 9.99

Magazines



  • Wired‘s DesignLife special issue: free

  • Maxim, monthly subscription: $ 1.25; annual subscription: $ 7.49

  • Popular Photography, monthly subscription: $ 1.99; annual subscription: $ 7.49

  • Women’s Health, monthly subscription: $ 2.00; annual subscription: $ 9.99

  • Cooking Light, monthly subscription: $ 1.99; annual subscription $ 9.99

  • Cosmopolitan, January issue: $ 0.99; annual subscription: $ 9.99






The Verge – All Posts



Google Black Friday 2013 deals: a full cyber weekend"s worth

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Missing: hard drive containing Bitcoins worth £4m in Newport landfill site

Missing: hard drive containing Bitcoins worth £4m in Newport landfill site
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ebde9__74404?ns=guardian&pageName=Article3Ahard-drive-bitcoin-landfill-site3A2004372&ch=Technology&c3=GU.co.uk&c4=Bitcoin2CTechnology&c5=Unclassified&c6=Alex+Hern&c7=20132F112F27+043A00&c8=2004372&c9=Article&c10=News&c13=&c19=GUK&c47=UK&c64=UK&c65=Missing3A+hard+drive+containing+Bitcoins+worth+C2A34m+in+Newport+landfill+site&c66=News&c67=nextgen-compatible&c72=&c73=&c74=&c75=&h2=GU2FNews2FTechnology2FBitcoin


A digital ‘wallet’ containing 7,500 Bitcoins that James Howells generated on his laptop is buried under four feet of rubbish


Buried somewhere under four feet of mud and rubbish, in the Docksway landfill site near Newport, Wales, in a space about the size of a football pitch is a computer hard drive worth more than £4m.


It belonged to James Howells, who threw it out when he was clearing up his desk in mid-summer and discovered the part, rescued from a defunct Dell laptop. He found it in a drawer and put it in a bin.


And then last Friday he realised that it held a digital wallet with 7,500 Bitcoins created for almost nothing in 2009 – and then worth about the same.


“You know when you put something in the bin, and in your head, say to yourself ‘that’s a bad idea’? I really did have that,” Howells, who works in IT, told the Guardian. “I don’t have an exact date, the only time period I can give – and I’ve been racking my own brains – is between 20 June and 10 August. Probably mid-July”. At the time he obliviously threw them away, the 7,500 Bitcoins on the hard-drive were worth around £500,000. Since then, the cryptocurrency’s value has soared, passing $ 1,000 on Wednesday afternoon.


Although Bitcoins have recently become part of the zeitgeist – with Virgin saying it will accept the currency for its Virgin Galactic flights, and central bankers considering its position in finance seriously – Howells generated his in early 2009, when the currency was only known in tech circles. At that time, a few months after its launch, it was comparatively easy to “mine” the digital currency, effectively creating money by computing: Howells ran a program on his laptop for a week to generate his stash. Nowadays, doing the same would require enormously expensive computing power.


That lost hard drive, though, contains the cryptographic “private key” that is needed to be able to access and spend the Bitcoins; without it, the “money” is lost forever.


And Howells didn’t have a backup.


Howells stopped mining after a week because his girlfriend complained that the laptop was getting too noisy and hot while it ran the programs to solve the complex mathematical problems needed to create new Bitcoins.


In 2010, the Dell XPS N1710 broke after he accidentally tipped lemonade on it, so he dismantled it for parts. Most were thrown away or sold, but he kept the hard drive in a desk drawer for the next three years – until that fateful summer day when he had the clearout.


Howells didn’t realise his mistake until Friday. Since then, he said, “I’ve searched high and low. I’ve tried to retrieve files from all of my USB sticks, from all of my hard drives. I’ve tried everything just in case I had a backup file, or had copied it by accident. And … nothing.”


He even went down to the landfill site itself. “I had a word with one of the guys down there, explained the situation. And he actually took me out in his truck to where the landfill site is, the current ditch they’re working on. It’s about the size of a football field, and he said something from three or four months ago would be about three or four feet down.”


After he stopped mining Bitcoins in 2009, Howells hadn’t given the currency much thought. “I hadn’t kept up on Bitcoin, I’d been distracted. I’d had a couple of kids since then, I’d been doing the house up, and forgot about it until it was in the news again.”


Howells considered retrieving the hard drive himself, but was told that “even for the police to find something, they need a team of 15 guys, two diggers, and all the personal protection equipment. So for me to fund that, it’s not possible without the guarantee of money at the end.” As such, he’s resigned to never getting the virtual money back.


“There’s a pot of gold there for someone … I’m even thinking of registering www.returnmybitcoin.com. It’s available,” he said. He has also set up a Bitcoin wallet for donations aimed at recovering the hard drive.


“If they were to offer me a share, fair enough,” he said. “If they were to go out and find it for themselves … it’s my mistake throwing the hard drive out, at the end of the day.”


A spokeswoman from Newport council emphasised that any treasure hunters turning up to the landfill site wouldn’t be allowed in, but “obviously, if it was easily retrieved, we’d return it.”


“I’m at the point where it’s either laugh about it or cry about it,” Howells says. “Why aren’t I out there with a shovel now? I think I’m just resigned to never being able to find it.”


Nonetheless, he continues to believe, as he did four years ago, that Bitcoin is the future of money. “I still think it’s going to go higher. I just think it’s the next step of the internet, which is why I mined it in the first place. When I first came across it, I knew straight away. We had everything else at the time; Google, Facebook, they were already the market leaders in their areas. The only thing that was missing was an internet money.”


• Bitcoin: what you need to know





theguardian.com © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds









Technology news, comment and analysis | theguardian.com


Read more about Missing: hard drive containing Bitcoins worth £4m in Newport landfill site and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, November 22, 2013

Someone Just Bought $148 Million Worth Of Bitcoin


Rob Wile
businessinsider.com
November 22, 2013


That’s about 195,000 Bitcoins.


We say transacted because there is no way of knowing whether any money actually changed hands. The Bitcoins were transferred from several Blockchain “addresses” to another single address. Addresses are basically routing numbers, and an individual’s Bitcoin wallet can contain multiple addresses.


So barring some kind of deal that would almost certainly be required to be reported to some sort of third party, it’s likely to have just been an individual consolidating accounts.


Read more


This article was posted: Friday, November 22, 2013 at 12:23 pm


Tags: domestic news, economics









Infowars



Someone Just Bought $148 Million Worth Of Bitcoin

Tuesday, November 12, 2013

Banshee bitcoins: $5 million worth of bitcoin vanish in China

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Banshee bitcoins: $5 million worth of bitcoin vanish in China

Monday, October 14, 2013

Banksy Sells Art Worth $32K ... for $60 Each

Banksy Sells Art Worth $32K ... for $60 Each
http://thedailynewsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/0b1fe__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


(Newser) – Banksy yesterday sold some of his works at a Central Park stand—pieces worth about $ 32,000 each. The secretive street artist’s selling price, however, was decidedly lower: $ 60 per work. The collection, which was being sold by an elderly man, looked like it was full of fakes, the BBC notes; in fact, the works were signed by the artist, who posted about it on his website today. “Yesterday I set up a stall in the park selling 100% authentic original signed Banksy canvases. For $ 60 each,” the artist noted on the site for his New York residency, called Better Out Than In.


The stall took in just $ 420 all day, and some customers paid even less than $ 60; in a video, the BBC notes, one negotiates to get 50% off. But don’t rush over for a deal: “The stall will not be there again today,” the artist posted, adding, “I know street art can feel increasingly like the marketing wing of an art career, so I wanted to make some art without the price tag attached. There is no gallery show or book or film. It’s pointless. Which hopefully means something.” Each day this month, Banksy plans to create a piece of “elaborate graffiti, large scale street sculpture, video installation, or substandard performance art.”




Lifestyle from Newser




Read more about Banksy Sells Art Worth $32K ... for $60 Each and other interesting subjects concerning Living at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Are posh university flats promising investors 7% income worth a look?


By Lee Boyce


|


The words ‘luxury’ and ‘student accommodation’ are not two that instantly gel. However, one student home developer has just started its sixth upmarket project in two years offering investors a meaty return in the process.


Vita Student has launched a new £17million student accommodation scheme in Exeter, Devon, which promises investors a seven per cent yield guaranteed for five years – a figure considerably higher than the current average buy-to-let yield. 


So is an eye-catching offer like this worth a look, what exactly does a guaranteed income return look like and what are the catches? Lee Boyce takes a look.


Student living: The Exeter accommodation was launched to investors last Monday and has sold half of its apartments

Student living: The Exeter accommodation was launched to investors last Monday and has sold half of its apartments



The new Vita launch comes hot off the heels of three projects in Liverpool and one in Manchester and Bristol, bringing the total number of apartments it has in its portfolio to nearly 1,000.


The Exeter Portland House development – which will have 161 apartments available for investors starting from £77,950 – is due to be completed in time for the 2014/15 academic year. Within a week of launch last Monday, 55 per cent apartments had been sold.


Vita Student’s previous launch – Colston Avenue in Bristol – saw 132 apartments sell-out within seven weeks.


Its first project, The Chapel in Liverpool, was launched in March 2012 and was sold out by June 2012. The 67 studio apartments, which started from £57,950, have recently taken the first of its influx of students. Weekly rent starts from £119, with bills included.


All this has come as the student property market has roared ahead.


Investment in the student property sector is at its highest point, according to global estate agent Jones Lang LaSalle, with £2.7billion spent in the market in 2012 – a 125 per cent increase from 2011.


This could be looked at from two opposing perspectives, either investors are cottoning on to a lucrative and growing success story, or a bubble is forming.


Luxury: The student rooms in Exeter will come equipped with a high-end finish and fast internet connection

Luxury: The student rooms in Exeter will come equipped with a high-end finish and fast internet connection



Trevor Moore, CEO of Vita Ventures, said: ‘Investor requirement for student property like ours is at an all-time high.


‘We are able to deliver such a high yield by driving efficiencies at every level of the construction and operational process while in turn generating high rental returns from students who are willing to pay a premium for the facilities and level of service we provide.


‘The rate at which all our projects have sold demonstrates that our model is successfully addressing the market demand.’


How guaranteed is the rental yield?


The company promises a seven per cent yield on the Exeter project and up to nine per cent on others for a period of five years.


But how strong is that promise? The yield is guaranteed by the company only. The firms says it can guarantee the yield because of a ‘robust model’, but many other property developers in the past have said the same thing, especially before the great recession of 2008, and investors found some of those promises fell down when developers went under.


When it comes to any guarantee, you always need to evaluate what is backing it and quite how strong that pledge subsequently is.


For example, this is not a guarantee like those on other financial products. Regulated financial products, like savings accounts, are covered up to the value of £85,000 by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme in the event the provider goes out of business.


Nor is it up there with those judged to be the strongest of guarantees, such as the return on government bonds – gilts – which are backed by the state and will only fall away if the UK defaults on its debt.


The Vita guarantee relies on the company remaining solvent. If troubles did arise, the investor would still own the property, but then finding new tenants would become their responsibility and they may find rents on the open market are lower and do not deliver the returns promised here.


Many investors were caught out by this in the past, especially those who bought into new-build buy-to-let flats before the property crash.


Potential investors should always look into the finances of a company offering any deal before taking the plunge and make their own decision on how guaranteed a guarantee is.


What happens after five years?


The guaranteed yield ends after 5 years. From then on you will get whatever is left from the rent, which Vita sets, after the company has taken its service charge.


On a property worth £89,000 in Exeter, the annual management and service charge is £2,698 – more than three per cent of the purchase price.


This is important to bear in mind if you plan to sell after five years. Whoever you want to sell to will have to sign up to this arrangement, agreeing to give up a large chunk of their rental income in the process.


What do investors have to pay out?


- There is a small reservation fee to secure the property – this fee is deducted from the total cost.


- You pay a 25 per cent deposit within approximately 30 days of reservation.


- You pay a further 25 per cent payment approximately half-way through build.


- You pay a final payment on completion of the development.


What Vita offers students and why it reckons Exeter is worth buying


Exeter has recently experienced a huge growth in student numbers which has led to a major shortage of suitable accommodation, Vita Student says.


Students living at Portland House will benefit from fitted kitchens, en-suite bathrooms and a space-saving foldable double bed with integrated sofa.


The apartments also include free high-speed 100MB broadband, wi-fi and flat screen smart TVs as well as access to communal areas such as a study hub and leisure facilities – a far cry from the dingy vision that student accommodation typically brings.


Student numbers in Exeter have swelled to 19,000. This growth can be attributed to the university rising rapidly in the UK league tables culminating in it being named as The Sunday Times University of the Year in 2013.


The properties are all managed by Vita Student through a specialist management arm. This, it says, helps reduce costs for investors and gives students the best possible experience.


It adds that the minimum yield of seven per cent for five years on the Exeter project that it offers investors can be guaranteed because it is based on an extremely ‘robust model.’


Vita Student was founded in 2012 by luxury developer Vita Ventures which has been acquiring land at Russell Group university cities across the UK.


Vita Ventures was founded by the UK’s largest seller of overseas investment property, Select Property, together with luxury homes developer, Huntsmere, combining the expertise of both.


There are several other cities in the pipeline and it is specifically targeted Russell Group university cities such as Edinburgh, Cardiff, Southampton, Nottingham and Sheffield for its next projects.



WE LOST MONEY IN THE PROPERTY CRASH BUT INVESTING IN STUDENT HOMES STILL LOOKED ATTRACTIVE



Bhavesh Chande, an Independent financial adviser and his brother Chetan, a doctor, are both based in Greater Manchester and have been investing in buy-to-let and off-plan property in the UK and abroad for many years. In 2013 they wanted a new investment and choose Vita Student’s 279 unit project in First Street, Manchester, in February 2013.


When Bhavesh and Chetan came across the project, the business was offering investors the opportunity to buy fully-managed studio apartments from £77,950, with an assured rental yield of nine per cent for two years.


Bhavesh and Chetan quickly decided to buy two properties on the top floor of the building.


Bhavesh explains: ‘We’ve been investing in different buy-to-let projects in the UK and abroad together for years so we were really surprised when we found such an ideal investment opportunity so close to home here in Manchester. 


‘We had lost some money abroad during the property crash in 2008 so in 2013 we were more cautious about where we were investing and the First Street development seemed to fit the bill perfectly. Even though it is an off-plan scheme the completion date is next year which keeps the risk to a minimum.


‘As an IFA I know what to look for when it comes to investments so we did a lot of research into the student property market and were amazed at the returns it can generate.


‘The guaranteed yield for the first two years is an added bonus and really gives us peace of mind that we’re making a sensible investment.


‘My brother and I both went to Manchester University so we know the area well and we have no doubt as to whether the development will be popular with students. We’re confident that the location and quality of the finish means that filling our studios will be no problem.


‘Our two new apartments are certainly a world away from the shoebox student rooms I stayed in during university.


‘We’re looking forward to seeing the project completed next year and seeing our returns. If all goes well then we’ll definitely be building a Vita Student portfolio with apartments all over the UK.’






Be cautious when buying off-plan


Buying a property before it’s even been built requires faith. But more and more of us are doing it.
Estate agency Savills reports that 80 per cent of its new-build sales are now ‘off-plan’.



DO YOUR RESEARCH: OTHER VITA STUDENT OFFERINGS



- The Chapel in Liverpool: Launched in March 2012, sold out by June 2012. 67 studio apartments. Ready for 2013/14 academic year.


- Tinlings in Liverpool: Launched in June 2012, sold out by November 2012. 132 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- Crosshall in Liverpool: Launched in December 2012, currently 95 per cent sold out. 158 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- First Street in Manchester: Launched in late February 2013, sold out by July 2013. 279 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- Colston Avenue in Bristol: Launched July 2013, sold out by early September 2013. 132 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.


- Portland House in Exeter: Launched in September 2013, currently 55 per cent sold out. 161 studio apartments. Ready for 2014/15 academic year.




And Robert Fraser, of London estate agency Fraser & Co, says: ‘Some people had their fingers burnt buying off-plan during the downturn.


‘But if you’re confident in the developer, scheme, location and local market, it can be a great way to buy.’


It pays to be cautious. After the credit crunch, some people who’d bought apartments off-plan found the value had fallen by up to 35 per cent when they came to complete.


Kate Faulkner, at advice site propertychecklists.co.uk, says: ‘If you are buying off-plan in a rising market, you could get a bargain. If you agreed a price for, say, £150,000 and two years later it’s worth £160,000 or more, you’d be happy.’


But buyers should ensure the developer is reputable and have insurance so that if they go bust, you will get back your deposit.


Use an independent lawyer to check the paperwork.


Find out when the rest of the development will be finished, otherwise you risk living in a building site for the first few years – This is Money has listed current Vita Student offerings and planned finished dates to the right.


Under the Consumer Code for Home Builders, you have the right to withdraw from a purchase and receive a full refund if the completion date is unreasonably delayed by more than six months.








Money | Mail Online



Are posh university flats promising investors 7% income worth a look?

Monday, September 2, 2013

Is College Worth It?


Is College Worth It?


Email this item Email    Print this item Print    Share this item... Share

Posted on Sep 2, 2013



John McStravick (CC-BY)

By Michael Lindgren


Editor’s note: These four books are written in the shadow of the suspicion that the stories we tell ourselves about ourselves—concerning hard work, opportunity, meritocracy, achievement and social mobility—somehow no longer pertain.


“Is College Worth It”
A book by William J. Bennett and David Wilezol


“Hacking Your Education: Ditch the Lectures, Save Tens of Thousands, and Learn More Than Your Peers Ever Will”
A book by Dale J. Stephens


“Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality”
A book by Elizabeth A. Armstrong and Laura T. Hamilton


“College (Un)Bound: The Future of Higher Education and What It Means for Students”
A book by Jeffrey J. Selingo


In a famous episode of “The Sopranos,” Tony takes his teenage daughter on a college trip to an idyllic New England hamlet, only to run across a long-lost informant in hiding, whom he ends up garroting in the mud while his daughter tours the picturesque ivy-and-brick campus. Those of us who have recently been on college visits may feel that Tony drew the easier assignment. Give me a choice between comparing financial aid proposals and fighting a bad guy to the death, and I’ll be asking you to pass me the wire.


In my youth, the whole process was pretty laid-back. Where you went to college was an important decision, sure, but it didn’t inspire existential gloom, nor did it call into play financial and structural resources exceeding those of some European nations. If you didn’t get into one small, moderately prestigious liberal arts college, then another down the road would be sure to take you, and in 20 years it wouldn’t really matter which one, anyway. Of course, as I’m reminded—over and over and over again—it’s a different world today.


A classmate of mine at what was then a reasonably but not insanely selective Northeastern college has since become an education consultant. “So,” I asked him casually, “what chance do you suppose we would have—”


“None,” he said, before I could finish my question. “Neither of us would make the cut today. Not even close. It’s that competitive.”


None of this is news to any parent, of course, or indeed anyone at all who has looked at a newspaper, website, carrier-pigeon message or smoke signal in the past decade or so. Indeed, hardly a day goes by without another op-ed or speech decrying the crisis in higher education. With a generation of graduates crippled by the double whammy of unemployment and stratospheric levels of student debt, the conversation about what went wrong and how to fix it has become increasingly toxic and recriminatory. Like the blind men and the elephant, each of these four recent books offers some insights into the dilemma, but a comprehensive vision for reform remains elusive.


Former education secretary William J. Bennett and his co-author, David Wilezol, frame the question with characteristic bluntness in “Is College Worth It?” Their answer: a resounding “depends.” If you’re rich and can afford it, yes; if you’re a talented engineer, yes; otherwise, maybe not. The authors’ bugbear is the moderately achieving middle-class kid who, spurred by devious and unrealistic college financial aid departments and abetted by the federal government, takes on massive student debt in pursuit of an impractical education. Their conclusion—that “the most fundamental reform that should be made is abandoning the idea that a four-year college education is the appropriate or even necessary choice for everyone”—is pragmatic enough yet offers little comfort to those who will be left behind in the new economy.


“No matter how high-tech the economy becomes, elevators will get stuck [and] toilets will get clogged,” the authors rumble, sounding pretty much exactly like Ted Knight, in “Caddyshack,” telling Michael O’Keefe that “the world needs ditch diggers, too.” It doesn’t help their case much when they scoff at the “cushy working arrangements” of “underworked” professors or when they begin decrying the evils of coed dorms and the abandonment of the Western canon.


Despite these alarming lapses into Victorian high morality, Bennett and Wilezol would find an unlikely ally in Dale J. Stephens, a young entrepreneur and “unschooler” whose “Hacking Your Education” promises to show the savvy and self-motivated how to do an end run around college. Stephens’ book alternates between fluffy can-do exhortations (“If you write publicly for long enough, people will begin to offer you jobs!”) and breathless cocktail-party anecdotes about his friend Slacker X. McWeb, who dropped out of school and crashed a TED after-party and schmoozed with a bunch of famous people and is, like, a DJ now and flies first class all over the world! Buried deep within this silliness is some good common-sense advice: Use your public library, write 1,000 words a day, force yourself into uncomfortable interactions. More damning is the obvious but unspoken truth that smart, self-directed young people like Stephens will do well inside or outside a college environment, whereas no amount of “hackademics” is going to turn around lives betrayed by poverty, poor choices or substandard secondary education. My advice: Skim “Hacking Your Education” for its bracing message of self-empowerment, but go to college anyway.




New and Improved Comments


If you have trouble leaving a comment, review this help page. Still having problems? Let us know. If you find yourself moderated, take a moment to review our comment policy.





Truthdig: Drilling Beneath the Headlines



Is College Worth It?