Showing posts with label Option. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Option. Show all posts

Saturday, January 18, 2014

Fukushima"s operator says spin-off an option only for the future




TOKYO Sat Jan 18, 2014 6:32am EST





Tokyo Electric Power Co


1 of 3. Tokyo Electric Power Co’s (TEPCO) President Naomi Hirose speaks during an interview with Reuters at the company’s headquarters in Tokyo January 18, 2014.


Credit: Reuters/Toru Hanai




TOKYO (Reuters) – Spinning off the clean-up project at Japan’s wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant from the rest of operator Tokyo Electric Power’s business could be an option in the future if the decommissioning runs smoothly, the company’s president said.


Nearly three years after a devastating earthquake and tsunami hit the plant, Tokyo Electric (Tepco) is still struggling to contain radioactive water at the site and turn around its battered finances.


“Paying compensation (to evacuees), decontamination, and the work at the Fukushima plant; there is a lot of work to be done … We have to continue doing this, while maintaining the workers’ safety, their sense of responsibility, duty and keeping up their morale,” said Naomi Hirose in an interview with Reuters on Saturday.


Hirose said if working conditions improve significantly at Fukushima and worker shortages become no longer a problem, the utility could consider hiving off the Fukushima decommissioning from the rest of the business, a suggestion that had been made by policymakers since the disaster. But for now, Hirose said he remained opposed to such a scheme.


Japan this week approved a plan by Tepco, Asia’s largest utility, which aims to make savings in costs of $ 46 billion over 10 years, upgrade fossil fuel power plants and join alliances with other firms to procure liquefied natural gas (LNG) more cheaply.


But central to Tepco’s revival plan is the restart of the reactors at Kashiwazaki Kariwa, the world’s biggest nuclear power plant, as early as July, which faces staunch opposition from a local governor who has repeatedly called for the company’s liquidation.


Governor Hirohiko Izumida of Niigata, home to the Kashiwazaki plant some 300 kilometers (180 miles) northwest of Tokyo, said this week Tepco’s plan does not hold shareholders and banks accountable. He has also said that Tepco must not be allowed to consider restarting its other nuclear facilities before a comprehensive review of the Fukushima disaster.


Tepco also said in its latest revival plan that it may have to raise electricity prices by as much as 10 percent if Kashiwazaki restarts are further delayed.


FUKUSHIMA WORKERS


The unprecedented, 30-year decommissioning plan for Fukushima relies heavily on technological breakthroughs and on Tepco managing to get enough staff to work there.


Tepco doubled pay for contract workers at the plant to around $ 200 a day last year after criticism over its handling of their pay.


Previously a Reuters investigation had found that the pay of some workers was being skimmed off by sub-contractors, some had been hired under false pretences, and some contractors had links to organized crime gangs.


Hirose said Tepco does not permit workers’ pay to be skimmed by the various companies in the chain of contractors operating at Fukushima, but admitted that verifying whether laborers’ wages had actually been docked or not was complex.


“We did not increase (wages) to give out more money to those (firms) in the middle. Raising wages from 10,000 yen ($ 100) to 20,000 yen was difficult for us … of course we want the money to reach the correct place,” he said.


($ 1=104.27 Japanese yen)


(Editing by Greg Mahlich)





Reuters: Business News



Fukushima"s operator says spin-off an option only for the future

Saturday, November 23, 2013

ABC, NBC Minimize Senate Democrats Dropping Nuclear Option, Tout "Bold Move"


ABC’s Good Morning America and NBC’s Today on Friday did their best to downplay Senate Democrats’ Thursday move to curtail the Republican Party’s filibuster power. The two newscasts devoted a combined 39 seconds to the controversial vote, which ABC’s Dan Harris labeled a “bold move“. GMA apparently thought the potential marriage of serial killer Charles Manson was more important, as it devoted over two minutes of air time to that eyebrow-raising story. of


By contrast, Friday’s CBS This Morning spent nearly three minutes on the “historic change in the Senate“, as Norah O’Donnell put it. O’Donnell also wondered, “Will Democrats regret invoking the nuclear option?


Harris used his “bold move” term during a 23-second news brief on Good Morning America. The ABC news anchor also used the same “historic change” phrase that O’Donnell did:


DAN HARRIS: We’re going to talk about a historic change in Washington, which this morning is only intensifying the partisan bickering. In a bold move, Senate Democrats have changed long-standing filibuster rules, saying it is necessary to overcome legislative gridlock. From now on, only a simple majority vote will be needed to confirm most presidential nominees. Republicans called the move, which President Obama himself once opposed, a naked power grab.


Four minutes later, NBC’s Natalie Morales gave her very general 16-second news brief on Today about the Senate vote:


NATALIE MORALES: Some people say lawmakers are all talk, but that could change, as the Senate voted Thursday to weaken the power of the filibuster. The 52 to 48 vote is a win for Democrats. The vote makes it harder for Republicans to block confirmation of the President’s nominees for judges and other top posts.


On CBS This Morning, correspondent Nancy Cordes did something that Harris didn’t: play a clip of then-Senator Obama voicing his opposition to the “nuclear option” during a 2005 press conference:


NORAH O’DONNELL: The filibuster has played a huge role in the history of the Senate. This morning, that power of open-ended debate has been dramatically cut back.


CHARLIE ROSE: Senate Democrats voted yesterday to change the rule that allowed Republicans to block presidential appointments. Senators will only be allowed to filibuster Supreme Court nominations.


Nancy Cordes is on Capitol Hill. Nancy, good morning.


NANCY CORDES: Charlie and Norah, good morning to you. The rule they changed has been around for 96 years. Democrats say Republicans were abusing it, and they had no choice. But Republicans call this a power grab, and say that Democrats robbed the minority of one of its true few pieces of leverage.


[CBS News Graphic: "The Nuclear Option: Senate Dems In Dramatic Move To Curb Filbusters"]


CORDES (voice-over): All but three Democrats voted to clip the minority’s power, lowering the hurdle for curbing presidential appointees from 60 votes to a simple majority of 51 votes. That means Republicans can no longer block nominees if they don’t like them, or to extract unrelated concessions.


SEN. HARRY REID, (D), MAJORITY LEADER (from press conference): What has gone on is absolutely unfair and wrong, and I’m glad we changed it.


CORDES: Half of all the filibusters against presidential nominations in U.S. history have involved Mr. Obama’s nominees. Seventy-six presidential nominees are awaiting confirmation, for an average of 147 days. Republicans recently blocked three of the President’s nominees to the powerful U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in D.C. But Republicans say Democrats are only taking this step now because they’re trying to divert attention from ObamaCare’s problems.


[CBS News Graphic: "U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Washington DC; Blocked; Patricia Millett; Cornelia Pillard; Robert Wilkins"]


SEN. MITCH MCCONNELL, (R), KENTUCKY (on-camera, from speech on Senate floor): To my friends on the other side of the aisle, you’ll regret this, and you may regret it a lot sooner than you think.
                           
CORDES: That’s the same argument then-Senator Barack Obama made in 2005, when Republicans were in charge and considering the same move.


BARACK OBAMA (from May 2005 press conference): I think the loss will be enormous, and one that all parties involved will come to regret.


CORDES: On Thursday, he said times have changed.


OBAMA (from White House press conference): Today’s pattern of obstruction – it just isn’t normal. It’s not what our founders envisioned.


CORDES: Republican Senator John McCain led a bipartisan effort to head off the nuclear option in July. He was not successful this time.


CORDES (on-camera): Do you think the Senate can ever go back from this?


SEN. JOHN MCCAIN, (R), ARIZONA: I would be surprised because if we got the majority in 2015, I think there would be people who would be – not want to reverse it.


CORDES (live): Democrats argue this move is going to ease gridlock because they’ll be able to get these nominees through much quicker, while Republicans say it’s only going to increase mistrust on all the other issues. Either way, Charlie and Norah, nobody is getting confirmed over the next two weeks, because the Senate has just gone on a long recess.


ROSE: Thanks, Nancy.




BiasAlerts



ABC, NBC Minimize Senate Democrats Dropping Nuclear Option, Tout "Bold Move"

Friday, November 22, 2013

Kaine: Nuclear option improves Hill


Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine defended the Senate’s move to invoke the nuclear option, dismissing criticism as “teeth gnashing.”


“This will not make anything worse. You can work together in a majority rule situation, just like you can with filibusters, holds and clotures,” Kaine said Friday on CNN’s “New Day.” I actually believe that the Senate rules were impeding us working together.”







On Thursday, the Senate approved the historic rules change that will eliminate the filibuster on all presidential nominees, except those to the U.S. Supreme Court.


Kaine said there has been “historic abuse” of blocking President Barack Obama’s nominees, adding that “the other side has tried to use the Senate rules to nullify the law.”


However, the Democratic senator said “good will” will prevail in the chamber.


“There’s no reason that changing this to majority rule will result in ill will…people of goodwill will find ways to work together here,” Kaine said.


Citing his own time in the Virginia state Senate, which operates on majority vote without filibuster or cloture, Kaine said the change isn’t a “bad option at all” and dismissed the rhetoric being used.


“Despite all the teeth gnashing and calling it a nuclear option. … This will not cause any diminution in our ability to work together,” Kaine said.




POLITICO – Congress



Kaine: Nuclear option improves Hill

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Netanyahu: Bad Iran Deal Could Leave Military Action As Only Option

Israel-iran

AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite




Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that the plan currently being formulated by world leaders to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons will not be effective.




“This is a bad deal,” Netanyahu said on CNN’s “State of the Union.”


He said that global leaders should increase sanctions on Iran, not loosen them.


“I think, if you want a peaceful solution, as I do, then the right thing to do is ratchet up the sanctions,” he said. ”Iran is practically giving away nothing. It’s making a minor concession, which they can reverse in weeks, and you endanger the whole sanctions regime that took years to make.”


Netanyahu argued that an imperfect deal could backfire and force the U.S. and other to used the military option.


“If you do a bad deal, you may get to the point where your only option is a military option,” he said. “So a bad deal actually can lead you to exactly the place you don’t want to be.”




All TPM News



Netanyahu: Bad Iran Deal Could Leave Military Action As Only Option

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Fox News Sunday Panel Debates Zimmerman Verdict, Nuclear Option & Immigration Reform

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Fox News Sunday Panel Debates Zimmerman Verdict, Nuclear Option & Immigration Reform

Sunday, October 6, 2013

FLASHBACK - “The Salvador Option For Syria”: US-NATO Sponsored Death Squads Integrate “Opposition Forces”



[photo: US ambassador to Syria, Robert Stephen Ford]


This article was originally published in May 2012.


Modeled on US covert ops in Central America, the Pentagon’s “Salvador Option for Iraq” initiated in 2004 was carried out under the helm of the US Ambassador to Iraq John Negroponte (2004-2005) together with Robert Stephen Ford, who was appointed US Ambassador to Syria in January 2011, less than two months before the beginning of the armed insurgency directed against the government of Bashar Al Assad.

“The Salvador Option” is a “terrorist model” of mass killings by US sponsored death squads. It was first applied in El Salvador, in the heyday of resistance against the military dictatorship, resulting in an estimated 75,000 deaths.


US–sponsored death squads carrying  out their brutal work in El Salvador


John Negroponte had served as US ambassador to Honduras from 1981 to 1985. As Ambassador in Tegucigalpa, he played a key role in supporting and supervising the Nicaraguan Contra mercenaries who were based in Honduras. The cross border Contra attacks into Nicaragua claimed some 50,000 civilian lives.


In 2004, after serving as Director of National Intelligence in the Bush administration, John Negroponte was appointed US Ambassador to Iraq, with a very specific mandate: the setting up of “Salvador Option” for Iraq.  


The Salvador Option for Syria”: The Central Role of  US Ambassador Robert S. Ford


The US Ambassador to Syria (appointed in January 2011), Robert Stephen Ford had been part of Negroponte’s team at the US Embassy in Baghdad (2004-2005). In this regard, “The Salvador Option” for Iraq laid the groundwork for the launching of an armed insurgency in Syria in March 2011.   


In relation to recent events, the killing of 108 people including 35 children in the border city of Houla on May 27 was, in all likelihood, committed by US sponsored death squads under the “Salvador Option for Syria”. The deaths of civilians have been casually blamed by the Western media on the Al Assad government and the incident is being used as pretext for a “humanitarian” R2P intervention by NATO. Outright media fabrications, including the manipulation of images by the BBC suggest that the Syrian government was not behind the massacre:


“As information trickles out of Houla, Syria, near the city of Homs and the Lebanese-Syrian border, it is becoming clear that the Syrian government was not responsible for shelling to deaths some 32 children and their parents, as periodically claimed and denied by Western media and even the UN itself. It appears that instead, it was death squads at close quarters – accused by anti-government “activists” as being “pro-regime thugs” or “militias,” and by the Syrian government as the work of Al Qaeda terrorists linked to foreign meddlers.” (See Tony Cartalucci, Syrian Government Blamed for Atrocities Committed by US Sponsored Deaths Squads, Global Research, May 28, 2012)



Chronology of the Syria “Protest Movement”


US Ambassador Robert S. Ford was dispatched to Damascus in late January 2011 at the height of the protest movement in Egypt. (The author was in Damascus on January 27, 2011 when Washington’s Envoy presented his credentials to the Al Assad government).


At the outset of my stay to Syria in January 2011,  I reflected on the significance of this diplomatic appointment and the role it might play in a covert process of political destabilization. I did not, however, foresee that this destabilization agenda would be implemented within less than two months  following the instatement of Robert S. Ford as US Ambassador to Syria.


The reinstatement of a US ambassador in Damascus, but more specifically the choice of Robert S. Ford as US ambassador, bears a direct relationship to the onset of the insurgency integrated by death squads in mid-March 2011 (in the southern border city of Daraa) against the government of Bashar al Assad.


Robert S. Ford was the man for the job. As “Number Two” at the US embassy in Baghdad (2004-2005) under the helm of Ambassador John D. Negroponte, he played a key role in implementing the Pentagon’s “Iraq Salvador Option”. The latter consisted in supporting Iraqi death squads and paramilitary forces modelled on the experience of  Central America.



Ambassador Ford in Hama in July 2011


Since his arrival in Damascus in late January 2011 until he was recalled by Washington in October 2011, Ambassador Robert S. Ford played a central role in laying the groundwork within Syria as well as establishing contacts with opposition groups. The US embassy was subsequently closed down in February 2012.


Ford also played a role in the recruitment of Mujahideen mercenaries from neighboring Arab countries and their integration into Syrian “opposition forces”. Since his departure from Damascus, Ford continues to oversee the Syria project out of the US State Department:


“As the United States’ Ambassador to Syria—a position that the Secretary of State and President are keeping me in —I will work with colleagues in Washington to support a peaceful transition for the Syrian people. We and our international partners hope to see a transition that reaches out and includes all of Syria’s communities and that gives all Syrians hope for a better future. My year in Syria tells me such a transition is possible, but not when one side constantly initiates attacks against people taking shelter in their homes”. (US Embassy in Syria Facebook page)



“Peaceful transition for the Syrian people”? Ambassador Robert S., Ford is no ordinary diplomat. He was U.S. representative in January 2004 to the Shiite city of Najaf in Iraq. Najaf was the stronghold of the Mahdi army. A few months later he was appointed “Number Two Man” (Minister Counsellor for Political Affairs), at the US embassy in Baghdad at the outset of John Negroponte’s tenure as US Ambassador to Iraq (June 2004- April 2005). Ford subsequently served under Negroponte’s successor Zalmay Khalilzad prior to his appointment as Ambassador to Algeria in 2006.


Robert S. Ford’s mandate as “Number Two” (Minister Counsellor for Political Affairs) under the helm of Ambassador John Negroponte was to coordinate out of the US embassy, the covert support to death squads and paramilitary groups in Iraq with a view to fomenting sectarian violence and weakening the resistance movement.


John Negroponte and Robert S. Ford at the US Embassy worked closely together on the Pentagon’s project. Two other embassy officials, namely Henry Ensher (Ford’s Deputy) and a younger official in the political section, Jeffrey Beals, played an important role in the team “talking to a range of Iraqis, including extremists”. (See The New Yorker, March 26, 2007). Another key individual in Negroponte’s team was James Franklin Jeffrey, America’s ambassador to Albania (2002-2004).


It is worth noting that Obama’s newly appointed CIA head, General David Petraeus played a key role the organization of covert support to Syria’s rebel forces, the infiltration of Syrian intelligence and armed forces, etc.


Petraeus played a key role in Iraq’s Salvador Option. He led the Multi-National Security Transition Command (MNSTC)  “Counterinsurgency” program in Baghdad in 2004 in coordination with John Negroponte and Robert S Ford at the US Embassy in Baghdad.



General David Petraeus  (prior to his appointment as  Head of the CIA)


The CIA is overseeing covert ops in Syria. In mid-March, General David Petraeus met with his intelligence counterparts in Ankara, to discuss Turkish support for the Free Syrian Army (FSA)( CIA Chief Discusses Syria, Iraq With Turkish PM, RTT News, March 14, 2012)


David Petraeus, the CIA chief, held meetings with top Turkish officials both yesterday and on March 12, the Hürriyet Daily News learned. Petraeus met with Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan yesterday and his Turkish counterpart, Hakan Fidan, head of the National Intelligence Organization (MİT), the previous day.


An official from the U.S. Embassy said that Turkish and American officials discussed “more fruitful cooperation on the region’s most pressing issues in the coming months.” Turkish officials said Erdoğan and Petraeus exchanged views on the Syrian crisis and anti-terror fight. (CIA chief visits Turkey to discuss Syria and counter-terrorism | Atlantic Council, March 14, 2012).



The US State Department in collaboration with several US intelligence agencies and the Pentagon is overseeing US support to the Free Syrian Army.


A Syria policy committee chaired by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton involves the participation of Ambassador Robert Stephen Ford, CIA director David Petraeus, Jeffrey Feltman, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs and Derek Chollet, Principal Deputy Director of Clinton’s Policy Planning Staff at the State Department.


Under Jeffrey Feltman’s supervision, the actual recruitment of terrorist mercenaries, however, is carried out in Qatar and Saudi Arabia in liaison with senior intelligence officials from Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Libya and NATO. The former Saudi ambassador to the US, Prince Bandar, who remains a key member of Saudi intelligence, is said to be working with the Feltman group in Doha.


WWIII Scenario






WHAT REALLY HAPPENED



FLASHBACK - “The Salvador Option For Syria”: US-NATO Sponsored Death Squads Integrate “Opposition Forces”