Showing posts with label Affordable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Affordable. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

Fact Or Fiction: Obama Declares "Mission Accomplished" On Affordable Care Act

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Fact Or Fiction: Obama Declares "Mission Accomplished" On Affordable Care Act

Fact Or Fiction: Obama Declares "Mission Accomplished" On Affordable Care Act

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Fact Or Fiction: Obama Declares "Mission Accomplished" On Affordable Care Act

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

“Rights” Redefined – Charlie Crist: “We have a right to food. We have a right to water. We have a right to shelter; and we have a right to affordable health care in this country”

At Those Damn Liars, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Those Damn Liars and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Those Damn Liars makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Those Damn Liars does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Those Damn Liars.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Those Damn Liars and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Those Damn Liars send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Those Damn Liars has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Those Damn Liars"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


“Rights” Redefined – Charlie Crist: “We have a right to food. We have a right to water. We have a right to shelter; and we have a right to affordable health care in this country”

Saturday, November 30, 2013

How the Republican Tempest Over the Affordable Care Act Diverts Attention from Three Large Truths

How the Republican Tempest Over the Affordable Care Act Diverts Attention from Three Large Truths
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


Having failed to defeat the Affordable Care Act in Congress, to beat it back in the last election, to repeal it despite more than eighty votes in the House, to stop it in the federal courts, to get enough votes in the Supreme Court to overrule it, and to gut it with outright extortion (closing the government and threatening to default on the nation’s debts unless it was repealed), Republicans are now down to their last ploy.


They are hell-bent on destroying the Affordable Care Act in Americans’ minds.


A document circulating among House Republicans (reported by the New York Times) instructs them to repeat the following themes and stories continuously: “Because of Obamacare, I Lost My Insurance.” “Obamacare Increases Health Care Costs.” “The Exchanges May Not Be Secure, Putting Personal Information at Risk.”


Every Republican in Washington has been programmed to use the word “disaster” whenever mentioning the Act, always refer to it as Obamacare, and demand its repeal.


Republican wordsmiths know they can count on Fox News and right-wing yell radio to amplify and intensify all of this in continuous loops of elaboration and outrage, repeated so often as to infect peoples’ minds like purulent pustules.


The idea is to make the Act so detestable it becomes the fearsome centerpiece of the midterm elections of 2014 — putting enough Democrats on the defensive they join in seeking its repeal or at least in amending it in ways that gut it (such as allowing insurers to sell whatever policies they want as long as they want, or delaying it further).


Admittedly, the President provided Republicans ammunition by botching the Act’s roll-out. Why wasn’t HealthCare.gov up and running smoothly October 1? Partly because the Administration didn’t anticipate that almost every Republican governor would refuse to set up a state exchange, thereby loading even more responsibility on an already over-worked and underfunded Department of Health and Human Services.


Why didn’t Obama’s advisors anticipate that some policies would be cancelled (after all, the Act sets higher standards than many policies offered) and therefore his “you can keep their old insurance” promise would become a target? Likely because they knew all policies were “grandfathered” for a year, didn’t anticipate how many insurers would cancel right away, and understood that only 5 percent of policyholders received insurance independent of an employer anyway.


But there’s really no good excuse. The White House should have anticipated the Republican attack machine.


The real problem is now. The President and other Democrats aren’t meeting the Republican barrage with three larger truths that show the pettiness of the attack:


The wreck of private insurance. Ours has been the only healthcare system in the world designed to avoid sick people. For-profit insurers have spent billions finding and marketing their policies to healthy people – young adults, people at low risk of expensive diseases, groups of professionals – while rejecting people with preexisting conditions, otherwise debilitated, or at high risk of heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. And have routinely dropped coverage of policy holders who become seriously sick or disabled. What else would you expect from corporations seeking to maximize profits?


But the social consequences have been devastating. We have ended up with the most expensive healthcare system in the world (finding and marketing to healthy people is expensive, corporate executives are expensive, profits adequate to satisfy shareholders are expensive), combined with the worst health outcomes of all rich countries — highest rates of infant mortality, shortest life spans, largest portions of populations never seeing a doctor and receiving no preventive care, most expensive uses of emergency rooms.


We could not and cannot continue with this travesty of a healthcare system.


The Affordable Care Act is a modest solution.  It still relies on private insurers — merely setting minimum standards and “exchanges” where customers can compare policies, requiring insurers to take people with preexisting conditions and not abandon those who get seriously sick, and helping low-income people afford coverage.


A single-payer system would have been preferable. Most other rich countries do it this way. It could have been grafted on to Social Security and Medicare, paid for through payroll taxes, expanded to lower-income families through Medicaid. It would have been simple and efficient. (It’s no coincidence that the Act’s Medicaid expansion has been easy and rapid in states that chose to accept it.)


But Republicans were dead set against this. They wouldn’t even abide a “public option” to buy into something resembling Medicare. In the end, they wouldn’t even go along with the Affordable Care Act, which was based on Republican ideas in the first place. (From Richard Nixon’s healthcare plan through the musings of the Heritage Foundation, Republicans for years urged that everything be kept in the hands of private insurers but the government set minimum standards, create state-based insurance exchanges, and require everyone to sign up).


The moral imperative.  Even a clunky compromise like the ACA between a national system of health insurance and a for-profit insurance market depends, fundamentally, on a social compact in which those who are healthier and richer are willing to help those who are sicker and poorer. Such a social compact defines a society.


The other day I heard a young man say he’d rather pay a penalty than buy health insurance under the Act because, in his words, “why should I pay for the sick and the old?” The answer is he has a responsibility to do so, as a member the same society they inhabit.


The Act also depends on richer people paying higher taxes to finance health insurance for lower-income people. Starting this year, a healthcare surtax of 3.8 percent is applied to capital gains and dividend income of individuals earning more than $ 200,000 and a nine-tenths of 1 percent healthcare tax to wages over $ 200,000 or couples over $ 250,000. Together, the two taxes will raise an estimated $ 317.7 billion over 10 years, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation


Here again, the justification is plain: We are becoming a vastly unequal society in which most of the economic gains are going to the top. It’s only just that those with higher incomes bear some responsibility for maintaining the health of Americans who are less fortunate.


This is a profoundly moral argument about who we are and what we owe each other as Americans. But Democrats have failed to make it, perhaps because they’re reluctant to admit that the Act involves any redistribution at all.


Redistribution has become so unfashionable it’s easier to say everyone comes out ahead. And everyone does come out ahead in the long term:  Even the best-off will gain from a healthier and more productive workforce, and will save money from preventive care that reduces the number of destitute people using emergency rooms when they become seriously ill.


But there would be no reason to reform and extend health insurance to begin with if we did not have moral obligations to one another as members of the same society.


The initial problems with the website and the President’s ill-advised remark about everyone being able to keep their old policies are real. But they’re trifling compared to the wreckage of the current system, the modest but important step toward reform embodied in the Act, and the moral imperative at the core of the Act and of our society.  


The Republicans have created a tempest out of trivialities. It is incumbent on Democrats — from the President on down — to show Americans the larger picture, and do so again and again.




Robert Reich




Read more about How the Republican Tempest Over the Affordable Care Act Diverts Attention from Three Large Truths and other interesting subjects concerning Opinion Columns at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Why Americans Are Okay With the Affordable Care Act, But Despise Obamacare

why, americans, are, okay, with, the, affordable, care, act,, but, despise, obamacare,

Why Americans Are Okay With the Affordable Care Act, But Despise Obamacare
© AP Photo




The Onion recently published a satirical article titled “Man Who Understands 8% of Obamacare Vigorously Defends It From Man Who Understands 5%”. It was one of those moments where the Onion’s satire brilliantly hits a little too close to reality.


The American people understand the politics of Obamacare a lot better than they understand the policy of it, and it’s the media’s fault. The average person could probably tell you that many Republicans want to repeal the law, while Democrats generally favor it. They could probably tell you the fight over funding Obamacare is at the heart of the current budget battle that might result in a government shutdown. They could recite some talking points that are thrown around on cable news programs. But when it comes down to the actual policy of Obamacare, few could go beyond those talking points.


A recent survey conducted by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans surveyed were unaware that the Affordable Care Act’s online marketplace for health insurance exchanges go live on October 1st. Even more disturbingly, nearly three-quarters of uninsured Americans surveyed — those who are intended to benefit from this — were unaware.


But being unaware of this critically important aspect of the law did not stop people from having an opinion of the law itself. And people’s opinion of the law also hinges on what you call it.


Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act are obviously the same thing, but they have different favorability ratings. CNBC’s third-quarter All-American Economic Survey asked 812 respondents what they thought of Obamacare and what they thought of the Affordable Care Act.


Nearly one third of respondents did not know what the Affordable Care Act is, compared to only 12% who didn’t know what Obamacare is — which probably reflects the more popular usage of the term “Obamacare” than “Affordable Care Act.” The positives and negatives of the law rise when it is called “Obamacare” as opposed to the “Affordable Care Act.” The survey concluded that 46% of respondents oppose Obamacare, while only 37% oppose the Affordable Care Act. Similarly, the positive approval rating of the law jumps 7 points from 22-29% when it is called Obamacare. The rest of the respondents were unsure. When Obama’s name is attached to health care, people’s personal opinions of Obama himself are likely to skew their perception of the law. In other words, Republicans and Democrats react pretty much like you’d expect.


Another interesting revelation of the survey was that Republicans think they know more about Obamacare than everyone else. While 30% of respondents as a whole admitted they felt they didn’t know enough about Obamacare to have an opinion, only 18% of Republicans said the same.


The term “Obamacare” was originally coined by opponents of the health care reform law in the days of its inception, and for a long time was used almost exclusively by opponents of the law because it had a more negative connotation to it than “health reform” or “Affordable Care Act”. While Obama has won every institutional battle over health care reform, opponents of the law are still winning the propaganda war.


The president remains confident. He told students at a community college in Maryland the other day, “Once it’s working really well, I guarantee they will not call it Obamacare.”




PolicyMic



Why Americans Are Okay With the Affordable Care Act, But Despise Obamacare

Saturday, August 24, 2013

Obama Weekly Address: Making Higher Education More Affordable For The Middle Class


White House: In his weekly address, President Obama notes that while college education has never been more important, it has also never been more expensive, which is why he proposed major new reforms this week to make college more affordable for middle class families and those fighting to get into the middle class.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Obama Weekly Address: Making Higher Education More Affordable For The Middle Class

Friday, August 23, 2013

Can Obama make colleges more affordable by rating them?

The average college student graduates with $ 26,000 in debt. Obama thinks he can fix that.



O


n Thursday, Obama unveiled his plan to drive down costs in higher education: Rating universities by affordability.


Well, not just affordability, even if that is supposed to play a huge part. The ratings would reflect a school’s “value” — which would factor in tuition, graduation rates, the percentage of lower-income students in attendance, average student loan debt, and earnings after graduation.


Over the last 30 years, tuition costs have tripled, leaving the average student with $ 26,000 in debt and making reform of the university system a necessity.


“Higher education cannot be a luxury,” Obama told an enthusiastic crowd of students at the University at Buffalo. “It’s an economic imperative.”


Eventually, if approved by Congress, federal financial aid would be tied to those ratings, the idea being to coax universities into reducing the cost of an education. The president wants to put his system in place by the beginning of the 2015 school year.


Why it might work
Right now, schools don’t have much of an incentive to keep costs down, writes Slate‘s Matthew Yglesias:


Competition among schools is dominated by the quest to attract better applicants by spending money on other inputs. That means recruiting star faculty, building nicer dorms, spending financial aid money on students from prosperous families, and more. [Slate]

Take New York University. Next year, tuition plus room and board will hit $ 64,000, according to The Atlantic‘s Jake Flanagin, a recent NYU graduate, who claims the school’s “track record for providing financial aid isn’t great” even as it funds pricey expansions in New York City, Dubai, and Shanghai.


Currently, federal student aid is distributed to colleges based on how many students they enroll. To get a bigger piece of the federal pie, schools like NYU just have to attract more students. They don’t have to worry about the mountain of debt those students could leave with — in some cases, without even graduating.


Another factor that drives up costs? Colleges, much like hospitals, don’t have to worry about losing “customers,” writes Ezra Klein at Bloomberg:


If Best Buy Co. wants to charge you too much for a television, you can walk out… When push comes to shove, producers need to meet the demands of consumers. But you can’t walk out on medical care for your spouse or education for your child… In these markets, when push comes to shove, consumers meet the demands of producers.


The result, in both cases, is similar: skyrocketing costs for a product of uncertain quality. [Bloomberg]

Obama’s plan would, ideally, create an incentive for schools to bring down their tuition costs and for students to pick the school that will get them employed without a lot of debt.


Why it might not work
“Defining the right quality metrics is difficult, and making sure you’re not penalizing institutions that accept disadvantaged kids is crucial,” writes Klein. “And that’s before you even get into the politics.”


Yes, the politics. At first, the plan would seem to have bipartisan appeal. Obama is not suggesting an increase in spending on student aid; he is suggesting a change in how that money is spent.


Wasting less money on education “sounds pretty conservative,” writes New York columnist Jonathan Chait. “On the other hand, so did finding ways to get the government to spend less money on health care, a goal Republicans now deem a socialistic nightmare so terrifying they are mulling which catastrophic hostage threat they should use to destroy it.”


Not only would Obama have to convince Congress to play ball, he would also have to contend with university administrators and alumni from some very powerful institutions. The University at Buffalo might be a good school and a great value, but it doesn’t have as many influential, wealthy proponents as the Yales and Harvards of the world.


The battle over what “value” means will also be contentious. How do you rank earnings after graduation? Does that mean pumping out engineers will benefit your school more than producing liberal arts majors? Will schools turn away students they think won’t graduate?


These are the questions Congress will have to answer, if lawmakers ever get around to taking up the issue.




The Week: Most Recent U.S. Posts



Can Obama make colleges more affordable by rating them?

Saturday, August 17, 2013

Weekly Address: Working to Implement the Affordable Care Act


August 17, 2013 | 3:56 | Public Domain


President Obama says we are on the way to fully implementing the Affordable Care Act and helping millions of Americans.


Download mp4 (143MB) | mp3 (9MB)



President Obama’s Weekly Address



Weekly Address: Working to Implement the Affordable Care Act

Saturday, July 20, 2013

President Obama Speaks on the Affordable Care Act


East Room


11:30 A.M. EDT


THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you very much.  Thank you so much, everybody.  I want to thank Morgan for that introduction.  And I want to thank all of you for being here.  There are a couple of people that I want to make sure to especially acknowledge. 


First of all, the Leader of the Democrats in the House of Representatives and somebody who worked harder than just about anybody to get the Affordable Care Act into law, Nancy Pelosi.  (Applause.) 


We have some outstanding members of Congress here, some mayors and elected officials who are here.  I want to give a special shout-out — I’m not going to introduce all of them because it would take too much time and I might miss somebody.  But there is one person who’s standing in front — sitting in front, who I want to acknowledge just because he has served for decades, and for decades fought to make sure that everybody had affordable, accessible coverage, and we’re so proud of him — John Dingell.  (Applause.)  Congressman from Michigan.  (Applause.)


So I want to welcome everybody to the White House.  Every day, across the country and certainly here in the White House, there are people who are working as we speak to implement the Affordable Care Act and to deliver the security of quality, affordable health care to more Americans. 


The good news is that starting October 1st, new online marketplaces will allow consumers to go online and compare private health care insurance plans just like you’d compare over the Internet the best deal on flat-screen TVs, or cars or any other product that is important to your lives.  And you’re going to see competition in ways that we haven’t seen before.  Insurance companies will compete for your business.  And in states that are working hard to make sure this law delivers for their people, what we’re seeing is that consumers are getting a hint of how much money they’re potentially going to save because of this law.  In states like California, Oregon, Washington, new competition, new choices, market forces are pushing costs down.


Just yesterday, state officials in New York announced that average premiums for consumers who buy insurance in their new marketplace will be at least 50 percent lower next year than they are today.  Think about that — 50 percent lower.  (Applause.)  So for people like Morgan who are self-employed, who have to buy on the individual market, they’re suddenly going to see opportunities not just for the rebates we discussed, but also for even greater savings in their monthly premiums. 


So if you already buy insurance on the individual market, meaning that you don’t get insurance through a big group plan through your employer, that could mean thousands of dollars a year that can go towards paying a mortgage, or putting a kid through college, or saving for retirement.  And what this means is that hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers who don’t have insurance will finally be able to afford it — because these exchanges, this big pool is going to reduce the cost, and you may qualify for health care tax credits; middle-class families will potentially qualify for these credits that will bring the cost down even more. 


So this is just an example of how the Affordable Care Act is doing what it’s designed to do:  deliver more choices, better benefits, a check on rising costs, and higher quality care.  That’s what it was designed to do, and we’re already seeing those effects take place.


Now, I mention all this because yesterday, despite all the evidence that the law is working the way it was supposed to for middle-class Americans, Republicans in the House of Representatives voted — for nearly the 40th time — (laughter) — to dismantle it.  We’ve got a lot of problems in this country, and there’s a lot of work that Congress needs to do:  get a farm bill passed, get immigration reform done, make sure we’ve got a budget in place that invests in our children and our future.  And yet, instead we’re refighting these old battles.  (Laughter.)  Sometimes I just try to figure out why.  Maybe they think it’s good politics.  But part of our job here is not to always think about politics.  Part of our job here is to sometimes think about getting work done on behalf of the American people, on behalf of the middle class and those who are striving to get into the middle class.  (Applause.)


And so the progress that we’re seeing in California and Washington and Oregon and now New York, that’s progress that we want to make sure we’re seeing all across the country.  Because there are still millions of people out there who not only want to get health insurance, but many who have health insurance who deserve a better deal and deserve the kinds of savings that the Affordable Care Act will offer.


Now, if you’re one of the 85 percent of Americans who already have health insurance — could be through your employer, or through Medicare, or through Medicaid — you already have an array of new benefits in place.  You don’t have to wait until October 1st.  You’re already getting benefits even if you don’t know that it’s because of the Affordable Care Act.  You’re getting better protections.  You’re getting more value for each dollar that you spend on your health care. 


And that last point — the issue of getting better value for your buck — is what I want to focus on today.


For years, too many middle-class families saw their health care costs go up and up and up, without much explanation as to why or how their money was being spent.  But today, because of the Affordable Care Act, insurance companies have to spend at least 80 percent of every dollar that you pay in premiums on your health care — not on overhead, not on profits, but on you. 


Now, many insurance companies are already exceeding this target, and they’re bringing down premiums and providing better value to their customers.  But those that aren’t now actually have to reimburse you.  If they’re not spending your premium dollars on your health care — at least 80 percent of it — they’ve got to give you some money back. 


Last year, millions of Americans opened letters from their insurance companies — but instead of the usual dread that comes from getting a bill — (laughter) — they were pleasantly surprised with a check.  In 2012, 13 million rebates went out, in all 50 states.  Another 8.5 [million] rebates are being sent out this summer, averaging around 100 bucks each.  And for families like Morgan’s that are working hard, every dollar counts.  It makes a difference.   


As she said during her introduction, she’d been buying insurance on the individual market in Maryland for years.  After she got a rebate for the first time — and I’m quoting Morgan now — she said, “It felt like someone was actually being held accountable for the dollars I was spending on health care.”  That’s one of core principles of the Affordable Care Act — holding insurance companies and providers accountable so that we all get a better deal. 


Dan Hart, who’s here, from Chicago, had read these rebates were happening.  But he didn’t think anything of it until he got a check in the mail for $ 136.  And Dan is a father of two, and as any parent will tell you, those kids, they suck up a lot of money.  (Laughter.)  Am I right?  (Laughter.)  Absolutely.  So he used his rebate to pay some bills. 


Rick Shewell and Claudia Diamond co-own a stationary store in Arlington, Virginia.  They knew about the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, but, Rick said, “I figured we’d never see the money.”  So it was a complete surprise when they got a rebate for $ 320 — put that money right back into their small business.


And this is happening all across the country, and it’s happening because of the Affordable Care Act.  It hasn’t been reported on a lot.  I bet if you took a poll, most folks wouldn’t know when that check comes in that this was because of Obamacare — (laughter) — that they got this extra money in their pockets.  But that’s what’s happening.


Now, even if you don’t get a rebate, even if you didn’t get a rebate there’s a good chance that these reforms are helping you as well, because one easy way to meet the goal of spending 80 percent of every dollar on care is to charge less for your care.  Now, we’ve got more work to do to get rising health care costs under control.  And some of the gains that we’ve made, some of the progress we’ve made in slowing the rise of health care costs isn’t always passed on to workers.  Sometimes companies may keep it and they are charging their employees a higher co-pay or higher deductible, or in some way shifting some costs onto some workers. 


But generally speaking, what we’ve seen is that health care costs have slowed drastically in a lot of areas since we’ve passed the Affordable Care Act.  We’ve got a lot more work to do, but health care inflation is not skyrocketing the way it was.  And because of this new rule, because of the fact that it improves the value of the coverage that you purchase, last year alone, Americans saved $ 3.4 billion in lower premiums.  That’s $ 3.4 billion on top of these rebates.


So that’s just one way this law is helping middle-class families.  But it represents everything the Affordable Care Act means for folks who already have insurance:  better benefits, stronger protections, more bang for your buck — the basic notion that you ought to get what you pay for. 


Now, I recognize that there are still a lot of folks — in this town, at least — who are rooting for this law to fail.  Some of them seem to think this law is about me.  It’s not.  I already have really good health care.  (Laughter.)  


It’s about the dad in Maryland who, for the first time ever, saw his family’s premiums go down instead of up.  It’s about the grandma in Oregon whose free mammogram caught her breast cancer before it had a chance to spread.  It’s about the mom in Arizona who can afford heart surgery for her little girl now that the lifetime cap on her coverage has been lifted.  It’s about the folks here today who got a little bit of relief. 


And I’m curious — what do opponents of this law think the folks here today should do with the money they were reimbursed?  Should they send it back to the insurance companies?  Do they think that was a bad idea to make sure that insurance companies are being held accountable?  I know that’s not what these folks think. 


So the upshot is the American people deserve a fair shot.  They expect businesses to play by a fair set of rules.  And that’s why this fight is so important.  Our broken health care system threatened the hopes and the dreams of families and businesses across the country who feared that one illness or one accident could cost them everything they’d spent a lifetime building.  And step by step, we’re fixing that system. 


It’s hard.  This is a big country, and the health care industry is massive and there are tons of providers.  And so as we implement, there are going to be glitches and there are going to be certain states that for political reasons are resisting implementation.  And we’re just steadily working through all that stuff.


The same was true when Medicare was started.  The same was true when Social Security got started.  There were folks who, for political reasons, resisted implementation.  But once it got set up, people started saying, this is a pretty good deal; it gives me a little more security.  It’s part of that basic bargain that if you work hard, if you’re doing the right thing, that you can get ahead in this country — and that you can provide some basic protections for your family.


And health care is at the heart of it; it’s part of it.  Affordable health care is not some privilege just for the few.  It’s a basic right that everybody should be able to enjoy.


So we’re going to keep fighting to secure that right — to make sure that every American gets the care that they need, when they need it, at a price they can afford.  That’s the America we believe in.  That’s what families deserve.  That’s what we’re going to keep on working to deliver.  We’re going to keep on working to make sure many people around this country who are already paying premiums are getting cheaper prices, that the money is being actually spent on their health care, that you’re not having to worry about the fine print, and that if you don’t have health insurance, you finally are in a position to get some at an affordable price — to give you and your family the kind of security you deserve.


That’s something that everybody should support.  That’s not something that should be subject to politics.  If the folks who have been trying to make political hay out of this thing, if they had some better ideas, I’ve already told them I’m happy to hear them.  But I haven’t heard any so far.  (Laughter.)  What I’ve heard is just the same old song and dance.  We’re just going to blow through that stuff and just keep on doing the right thing for the American people.


So thank you very much.  (Applause.)


END
11:47 A.M. EDT


Close Transcript




White House Speeches



President Obama Speaks on the Affordable Care Act

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Affordable Care Act: Republicans in Congress Vote to Repeal Obamacare


affordable, care, act:, republicans, in, congress, vote, to, repeal, obamacare,

Affordable Care Act Republicans in Congress Vote to Repeal Obamacare




Republicans in Congress are at it again. Thursday will mark the 37th vote taken in the House to repeal the Affordable Care Act that was set into law in 2010. While elected officials cite public disapproval of the health care law; their repeated attempts suggest a strong case of denial among legislators. Despite Speaker of the House, John Boehner announcing the health care as “law of the land,” his fellow GOP members are clinging strongly to the improbable repeal.  


The GOP argues that they are fighting to repeal the “job-killing health care bill” because American’s don’t support the economic effects of the law. However, a recent study conducted by The Kaiser Foundation found that a large number of American’s remain unaware of all components of the law, and the majority wishes to amend it, not de-fund it. Yet despite the preference of constituents, Republicans continue to bring the bill back to a vote, hoping for different results. Republicans should reconsider their approach if they truly wish to make decisions that benefit the country, not only to save their own time, but most importantly to better serve the American people.


If Republicans are truly concerned with the economic consequences of the Affordable Care Act, why are they choosing the most difficult route to do prevent them? Historically, overturning a Supreme Court decision has been extremely difficult with limited constitutional options to repeal the law. While there have been some cases that have been overturned years later, most success for the GOP has been made taking a wider base approach. For example, conservative groups used state level legislation to set records in 2011 for limiting abortion-related services across the United States. Their relentless approach gave them the results, whereas constant voting to repeal a Supreme Court verdict in Congress wastes time, yielding no long-term results.


Bipartisanship, however, would have long-term benefits for the country. Instead of seeking a repeal that is guaranteed to be vetoed by the president, Republicans could look to what their constituents have been calling for. If Republicans want to fix the economy, they could work with Democrats to mollify any potential economic hazards before the law takes full effect this year. Amending the bill through bipartisan compromise will give Americans not only the economic benefits, but the Congress they deserve to have representing them.


So before Republicans schedule their 38th vote, they should reevaluate just what the American people are asking for. Amending the law alongside Democrats could not only prevent the “job-killing” they so deeply fear, but it could remove them from their denial and put them back in sight of what America needs.




PolicyMic



Affordable Care Act: Republicans in Congress Vote to Repeal Obamacare

Friday, March 22, 2013

Affordable Care Act at 3: Looking Forward and Expanding Access

Ed. note: This post was first published on the official blog of healthcare.gov. You can see the original post here.

Three years ago, the Affordable Care Act ushered in a new day for health care.

Since then, more than 6.3 million seniors and people with disabilities with Medicare have saved more than $ 6.1 billion dollars on prescription drugs.  Nearly 71 million Americans got expanded access to preventive service at no charge through their private insurance plans, and 47 million women now have guaranteed access to additional preventive services without cost sharing. More than 3.1 million young adults who were uninsured were able to gain coverage by being able to stay on their parents’ insurance policies until they turned 26.  And parents no longer have to worry about insurers denying coverage to their children because of a pre-existing condition.

Americans are getting more value for their health care dollars due to the health care law. Affordable Care Act initiatives are promoting coordinated care; paying for quality, not quantity; and dramatically reducing fraud and waste, contributing to the slowest growth in national health spending in 50 years. 

Consumers also saved $ 2 billion in 2012, because of programs to review premium rates and to require insurers to provide rebates if they do not spend at least 80 percent of premiums on care, rather than overhead, such as executive pay and marketing.  And the law’s initiatives have extended the life of the Medicare Trust Fund by eight years.

But that’s only the beginning. Thanks to the health care law, starting October 1, 2013, qualified individuals will have access to quality health insurance through the new Health Insurance Marketplace.

With the Marketplace, there’ll be a whole new way to find health insurance that fits consumers’ needs and budgets, with less hassle. Individuals, families, and small business owners in every state and the District of Columbia will be able to shop in the Marketplace for private insurance coverage that begins in January 2014. 

For the first time, you’ll be able to go to one place to learn about health insurance; get accurate information on different plans; and make apples-to-apples comparisons of private insurance plans—including costs and benefits.  You’ll get a clear picture of what you’re paying and what you’re getting before you make a choice. You’ll also be able to learn, with a single application, if you qualify for a free or low-cost plan, or a new kind of tax credit that lowers your monthly premiums right away.

Because the Affordable Care Act outlaws discriminating against anyone with a pre-existing or chronic condition, as of January 1, 2014, no one can be turned away by plans in the Marketplace or charged more because they’re in poorer health—or just because they’re a woman. At last, being a woman will no longer be a pre-existing condition.

And every health insurance plan in the Marketplace will cover a standard set of essential health benefits that includes, among other benefits, hospital stays, prescription drug coverage, preventive services, oral and vision care for kids.

Open enrollment begins October 1, 2013. Get ready now for the Marketplace by signing up for e-mails and text messages for updates and information at https://signup.healthcare.gov/

In June, the site will be unveiling the new Marketplace. You’ll be able to learn everything you need to know about the Marketplace, including how it works, the benefits of health insurance, how to choose a plan based on your needs and lifestyle, and more. Then in the fall, you can use this site to enroll in a plan from home, or from any place you can access the Web.

Every American needs and deserves quality health insurance.  The Marketplace will help ensure that Americans will have access to quality, affordable health insurance.  

Learn more about the Affordable Care Act:


White House.gov Blog Feed


Affordable Care Act at 3: Looking Forward and Expanding Access

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Affordable Care Act at 3: Holding Insurance Companies Accountable

Ed. note: This post was first published on the official blog of healthcare.gov. You can see the original post here. 

Enacted three years ago, the health care law is making the insurance market work better for you by prohibiting some of the worst insurance industry practices that have kept affordable health coverage out of reach for millions of Americans.

As a former state insurance commissioner, I know that for too long, too many hard-working Americans paid the price for policies that handed free rein to health insurance companies. For more than a decade before the Affordable Care Act, premiums rose rapidly, straining the budgets of American families and businesses. And insurers often raised premiums without any explanation.

It wasn’t fair and it was costing you your hard-earned dollars, security, and peace of mind.

The Affordable Care Act is working to bring affordability and fairness to the marketplace by barring insurers from dropping your coverage when you get sick or placing a lifetime dollar limit on coverage. In 2014, it will prohibit discriminating against you or anyone with a pre-existing condition, such as high blood pressure, asthma, or cancer.

In an effort to slow health care spending and give all Americans more value for their health care dollars, the Affordable Care Act has brought an unprecedented level of scrutiny and transparency to health insurance rate increases by requiring an insurance company to justify a rate increase before it shows up on your bill, thereby preventing arbitrary or unnecessary costs. Insurers must provide clear information so you can understand their reasons for significant rate increases.

We know this is making a difference, and that the law is driving down health insurance premium costs in the private market by holding insurers accountable.

A report last month shows that since the rule on rate increases was implemented, the number of requests for insurance premium increases of 10% or more plummeted from 75% to an estimated 14% since the passage of the health care law. The average premium increase for all rates in 2012 was 30% below what it was in 2010. And available data suggests that this slowdown in rate increases is continuing into 2013.

Even when an insurer decides to increase rates, consumers are seeing lower rate increases than what the insurers initially requested. More than half of the rate requests for 10% or more ultimately resulted in customers receiving either a lower rate increase than requested or no hike at all.

In 2014, insurers will be required to report all proposed rate increases, not just those 10% or more, in the individual and small-group markets.

Furthermore, the rate review program works in conjunction with the 80/20 rule, which requires insurance companies to spend at least 80% (85% in the large group market) of premiums on health care, rather than administrative costs (such as executive salaries and marketing) and profits, or provide rebates to their customers. Insurers that did not meet the 80/20 rule have provided $ 1.1 billion in rebates that benefited about 13 million Americans, at an average of $ 151 per family.

Insurance benefits and costs also will become clearer to millions of Americans and small businesses starting on October 1, 2013, when they will have the opportunity to shop in a Health Insurance Marketplace in their state. You will be able to find information to make apples-to-apples comparisons of health plans by quality and price and buy the one that best fits your needs and budget.

Delivering smarter health care includes holding insurers accountable, and that is helping to hold down costs. In the past three years, we’ve seen the slowest growth in overall health care spending since the government started keeping records more than 50 years ago.

We still have challenges to face. But for the first time in recent history, we’re making real progress in driving down the rate of growth and driving up the quality of care.

Find out more about the Effective Rate Review Program:

Follow Secretary Sebelius on Twitter at @Sebelius.

Related Topics: Health Care


White House.gov Blog Feed


Affordable Care Act at 3: Holding Insurance Companies Accountable