Showing posts with label Searching. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Searching. Show all posts

Saturday, February 22, 2014

Americans still think there’s more to learn about Benghazi – and want Congress to keep searching for the truth


Benghazi embassy post-attack


Americans across the political spectrum aren’t entirely convinced that the truth aboutthe Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, Libya has been fully uncovered, and think Congress should continue investigating the matter to find out whether the White House acted improperly during its handling of the attack, a Fox News poll released Friday reported. 


The poll found that two in three Americans – including 50 percent of Democrats – believe that Congress should continue to investigate the White House’s role in managing the attack, which resulted in the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans. Just 31 percent of Americans think Congress should move on from its Benghazi investigations.


House Republicans, led by Government and Oversight Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), have ferociously led the charge to continue the investigation, even going so far as to set up a website earlier this month that promises to bring the facts about the assault “straight to the American people.”


“The families of the fallen – and the American people – deserve to know the truth. They deserve justice,” a release issued by House Speaker John Boehner’s (R-Ohio) said. “After being stonewalled, House committees began a serious, exhaustive, and deliberate investigation into what led up to this tragic event, what transpired, and why the White House refused – and still refuses – to tell the whole truth.”


Benghazi will also be a key issue in the 2016 presidential race, as presumed Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s political future hangs on the balance of any potential investigation. Clinton was serving as Secretary of State for President Barack Obama at the time of the attack, and recently acknowledged in a speech before the National Automotive Dealers Association that her role in the scandal is her biggest political regret. 


“My biggest, you know, regret is what happened in Benghazi,” she said. “It was a terrible tragedy, losing four Americans, two diplomats and, now it’s public, so I can say two CIA operatives.”


At the same time, many in the mainstream media continue to doubt that there is any controversy surrounding the attack at Benghazi – especially when compared to real scandals like “Bridgegate.” HBO talk show host Bill Maher asserted on his show Friday evening that Benghazi isn’t a scandal at all, as he tried to convince MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow that her network might want to dial back its coverage of “Bridgegate” before the issue becomes its “Benghazi.”


Addressing a ‘break-up letter’ he penned to the liberal cable news network on Valentine’s Day, Maher said, ”I should have said that… yes, [Bridgegate] is not the same as Benghazi. I made that analogy, but I said this is your ‘Benghazi’. Benghazi is a real – Benghazi is nothing – there is no scandal there. This [Bridgegate] is an actual scandal.”


Fox News surveyed 1,006 registered voters nationwide via telephone from Feb. 9-11, 2014. The study has a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points. 




Red Alert Politics



Americans still think there’s more to learn about Benghazi – and want Congress to keep searching for the truth

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Good news: Obama administration doing a bit of soul searching in the wake of all these screwups


posted at 1:01 pm on November 16, 2013 by Erika Johnsen



President Obama’s out-of-nowhere-save-political-desperation announcement this week that he — emphasis on the he — intends to ‘allow‘ insurers to temporarily extend policies that have recently been canceled because they do not meet the coverage standards established by his signature legislative achievement. It’s an almost absurdly unworkable “fix” designed purely to enable the White House to be able to shift some of the blame for cancelled plans onto the insurance companies themselves, prompting a lot of people to wonder… is the president and his administration just making all of this up at will as they along?


Because that’s certainly what it looks like. Apparently, the White House is finally cottoning on to their steadily worsening image as a harebrained, unscrupulous, wildly political, say-anything talking-points machine, so no worries — they’re going to look into it. The WSJ reports:


The White House has begun a quiet self-assessment in the wake of the troubled health-law launch, recognizing that administration officials missed warning signs and put too much trust in their management practices in implementing a program that is the centerpiece of President Barack Obama‘s domestic legacy.


White House officials want to learn how the rollout flopped, despite what they believed had been sufficient planning, preparation and attention to the issue. Although not a full-bore “forensic” inquiry into what went wrong, the administration aims to organize itself so that “going forward, we don’t have these problems,” a senior White House official said in an interview. …


More details about managerial shortcomings emerged Friday, when a House committee released emails showing that staff who were working on the HealthCare.gov website worried the project was off track months before the Oct. 1 launch.



A self-assessment, thank goodness! My confidence is practically restored already!


…Alright, yes, that was sarcasm, but I’m sure there are plenty of “folks” — to borrow one of the president’s favored terms — for whom that could be true, and the White House’s ridiculously botched healthcare rollout isn’t doing progressivism any favors.



Related Posts:



Hot Air



Good news: Obama administration doing a bit of soul searching in the wake of all these screwups