Showing posts with label Tell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tell. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Tell Us: What’s The Best Meal You’ve Ever Eaten While Traveling?

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Tell Us: What’s The Best Meal You’ve Ever Eaten While Traveling?

Thursday, March 6, 2014

VIDEO: Bachelor Juan Pablo Galavis Broke and Living with His Parents!







The rejected bachelorettes teamed up to rip Juan Pablo Galavis apart on The Bachelor’s Women Tell All episode. And now we’re hearing more about the former soccer star’s life off camera. Forget the exotic islands and the private planes. When Juan Pablo isn’t on The Bachelor, he’s just a 32-year-old single dad who still lives with his parents in Miami! An insider tells the new issue of Life and Style, “Money must be tight, because he lives in a three-bedroom apartment with his mom and dad.” As for finalists, Clare and Nikki, a friend tells the mag, “The winner is about to be very surprised. She has no idea what she’s in for.” Yikes!













Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.







To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.







VIDEO: Bachelor Juan Pablo Galavis Broke and Living with His Parents!

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Police Tell Reporters That They Cannot Film Wastewater Plant From Public Street


Infowars.com
January 15, 2014


In a gross attack on the First Amendment, a police officer told Infowars reporters and crew that they could not film a wastewater plant from across a public street.


The officer said that he had the “authority” to stop them from filming even though he admitted that it was not illegal to film the facility.


“There’s no law, but like I said, based on the fact that it is a critical site, your activity is being deemed suspicious so we have the authority,” he said.


This is a perfect example of how police officers routinely use the “color of law” to deprive journalists of their First Amendment right to publicly film and cover news stories.


They use their “authority” to intimate reporters even though that authority runs contrary to basic human rights and the law.


The right to film in public has been affirmed time and time again by the U.S. Supreme Court and several federal Appeals Courts, which have all ruled that everyone – not just journalists – has an individual right to film (video, audio, photography, etc.) in public because there is “no expectation of privacy” in a public place.


In 2011, the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unambiguously that the First Amendment recognizes this right.


“It is firmly established that the First Amendment’s aegis extends further than the text’s proscription on laws ‘abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,’ and encompasses a range of conduct related to the gathering and dissemination of information,” Circuit Judge Kermit Lipez wrote in the court’s opinion.


Additionally, in 2012 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with a lower court ruling that a Illinois law which prevented citizens from filming police was unconstitutional.


This article was posted: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 at 1:24 pm










Infowars



Police Tell Reporters That They Cannot Film Wastewater Plant From Public Street

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Ease Up On "No Tolerance" Policies, U.S. Agencies Tell Schools


Saying that “zero tolerance” discipline policies at U.S. schools are unfairly applied “all too often,” Secretary of Education Arne Duncan is urging officials to rethink that approach. The Obama administration issued voluntary guidelines today that call for more training for teachers, and more clarity in defining security problems.


The move by the Education and Justice Departments comes after years of complaints from civil rights groups and others who say the policies are ineffective and take an unfair toll on minorities. The zero-tolerance approach has been blamed for boosting the number of suspensions and expulsions, and for equating minor infractions with criminal acts.


“A routine school disciplinary infraction should land a student in the principal’s office, not in a police precinct,” Attorney General Eric Holder said.


You can check out the Education Department’s plan online. It includes guidance that’s aimed at helping teachers enforce rules fairly, as well as resources to “help guide state and local efforts to improve school climate and school discipline.”


Prompted by fears of gang violence and shootings, “zero tolerance” discipline policies have taken hold in many U.S. states and school districts in the past two decades. As a report by the Vera Center On Youth Justice noted in December, some states adopted the polices to qualify for federal education funds.


But the policies have produced uneven results, reports Vera, which notes that in the U.S., “nearly a third (31 percent) of black boys in middle school were suspended at least once during the 2009–10 school year.”


And as NPR’s Claudio Sanchez reports for today’s All Things Considered, thousands of kids were referred to law enforcement, even if their behavior had not been violent.


“Federal government figures show that of the 3 million students who were suspended or expelled during the 2010-11 school year, a quarter of a million were referred to law enforcement, even though 95 percent were for non-violent behavior. The overwhelming majority — seven out of 10 — were black, Latino, or kids with disabilities.”


Today, the new guidelines were welcomed by advocates who have been working to change schools’ approach.


“What is great about what has been released today,” juvenile justice expert Deborah Fowler tells Claudio, “is that they give schools a variety of alternatives that have been proven successful.”


An attorney, Fowler is the deputy director of Texas Appleseed, a group that has worked to break what it calls a “school-to-prison pipeline.” The group has documented the effects of criminalizing wide swaths of students’ undesirable behavior.


Fowler reels off a short list: “Chewing gum in class or talking too loudly, or so many of the things that when I was a kid would’ve been handled with a trip to the principal’s office in Texas and elsewhere.”


Claudio reports that teachers’ groups welcomed the news of the change today – even as they also wondered who would pay for the new training the guidelines suggest.


The federal agencies that proposed changes today aren’t alone in seeing a problem. Last fall, Florida school officials rejected zero tolerance policies in an attempt “to reduce the number of children going into the juvenile justice system,” as NPR’s Greg Allen reported.


In that story, Greg visited one of the nation’s largest school districts, in Broward County, where officials had begun recording data on disciplinary actions and crimes in school.


“In 2010 and 2011, there were more than 1,000 school-related arrests,” he said, “and nearly three-quarters of them were for non-violent misdemeanors.”


And in Clayton County, Ga., changes were made after Juvenile Court Judge Steven Teske noticed a huge rise in school referrals to police – from 89 a year to 1,400 from the late 1990s to 2004, according to the website Safe Quality Schools.


The judge led an effort to work out a new plan, drawing on school officials, police, and the court system.


Under that plan, in which youths get warnings and then go to mediation or training programs, “The presence of dangerous weapons on campuses has decreased by 70 percent,” the site reports.


Safe Quality Schools is part of the Advancement Project. The head of that group, Judith Browne Dianis, tells Claudio that the new federal guidelines should put some school officials on notice.


“No longer should districts look the other way or make excuses for racial profiling in school hallways and in classrooms,” she says.




News



Ease Up On "No Tolerance" Policies, U.S. Agencies Tell Schools

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth
http://img.youtube.com/vi/dN5oiP9fD2Y/0.jpg


Abby Martin Breaks the Set on the Ted Cruz Coloring Book, the Nuclear Energy Alternative, NSA Gamers, and Buzzsaw’s Tyrel Ventura. LIKE Breaking the Set @ ht…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about [292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth
http://img.youtube.com/vi/dN5oiP9fD2Y/0.jpg


Abby Martin Breaks the Set on the Ted Cruz Coloring Book, the Nuclear Energy Alternative, NSA Gamers, and Buzzsaw’s Tyrel Ventura. LIKE Breaking the Set @ ht…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about [292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

The stories my family wouldn’t tell: Living through war in Lebanon

The stories my family wouldn’t tell: Living through war in Lebanon



Every other year, Jalil and his friend would drive to Germany to trade in their cars. The trip would take a few months, through Bulgaria and Serbia; he’d stop at roadside stands and buy fine hand-cut crystal glasses, sold by poor Soviet-satellite artisans for next to nothing, and bring them home to sell and give as gifts. One year, sometime before the civil war started, his daughters begged him, “Don’t get a yellow Mercedes!” The color was, for some reason, very popular that year, but Hanadi and Rula thought it made the otherwise classy car look like a taxi. He promised he wouldn’t, but when he drove back into town, of course it was in the big yellow car. They hated it, but after two years he traded it in again, though he doesn’t make the trip anymore. The road from Lebanon to Germany is not what it used to be.


During those times when Jalil was away, Henriette would have to start feeding the dog scraps from the table, since she didn’t have a car, and couldn’t drive to the meat-packing factory for Fox’s usual fare. The Sulaki would look at her, then at the food, then back at her, without touching it, and whine.


“If you don’t want to eat that,” Henriette would scold, as if he should understand her words, “you better pray the one who brings the good stuff comes back.”


In July of 1976, about a year after the start of the civil war, news came that Christian forces would begin a counterattack against the Muslim militia. All the schools closed, and the last thing on the dissolving government’s agenda was making sure teachers were still getting paid. This put Jalil, a physical education teacher, out of work, and the family in danger. My mother told me they left to live with a family in Tartous, Syria.


They had to leave Fox behind at the house, with my mother’s aunt and grandfather. The two of them stayed in the town with seven or eight other elderly people who couldn’t travel, along with my father’s family and a few other stubborn Lebanese — though my father told me the decision to stay near nearly cost him his life. But part of me can’t blame them. In a place and time like that, leaving meant abandoning everything; you might come back to find your house still standing, but what would be left of your life when you returned?


When the fighting finally reached Ras Masqa — at that time the last town before Tripoli, and what became the stalemated front line between Muslim and Christian forces — militiamen on both sides swept through the streets, shooting cats, dogs, birds — every animal they found — so that their barks and screeches wouldn’t give away the soldiers’ positions to their enemies.


Fox was the last dog they ever had. My grandfather was too heartbroken to replace him, even though he had owned hunting dogs all his life. And my mother, though it is clear she loves dogs, and never hesitates to baby-sit my sister’s or the neighbors’ dogs, has always refused to get one of her own. Growing up she gave other reasons: She didn’t want to clean up after it, or didn’t want it scratching up the furniture. But now I know this isn’t the truth — not the complete truth, anyway.


I also know that what she said about going to live with a family in Tartous wasn’t the complete truth either. They did go to Tartous, but they lived by themselves in a single room, with no electricity, no bathroom and no water. All seven of them — jiddou Jalil, taita Henriette, my mother Hanadi, age 14, aunt Rula, 12, uncle Michael, 8, uncle Chadi, 2 and a half, and my aunt Nidal, just 8 months — slept on two mattresses pushed together on the floor, with a single kerosene lamp for light, and a kerosene stove for cooking and heat. They left Ras Masqa in a hurry, with the clothes on their backs and no money, not knowing how long they would be gone. Jalil taxied people from Tartous to Damascus so the family could eat. They lived that way for four months, though it would be almost a year before they could return home.


This is what my mother wouldn’t talk about. Those days spent crowded in that room — the oldest of five children in exile, her mother still nursing the youngest, and her father gone for most hours of the day. Those days of her life she wouldn’t share with me. Not yet, at least.


No, that story was told to me by my grandfather Jalil. ButJalil, he wouldn’t talk about the dog.


This piece is the latest in a series by feminists of color, curated by Roxane Gay. To submit to the series, email rgay@salon.com.




Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

Salon.com


Read more about The stories my family wouldn’t tell: Living through war in Lebanon and other interesting subjects concerning Top Stories at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth
http://img.youtube.com/vi/dN5oiP9fD2Y/0.jpg


Abby Martin Breaks the Set on the Ted Cruz Coloring Book, the Nuclear Energy Alternative, NSA Gamers, and Buzzsaw’s Tyrel Ventura. LIKE Breaking the Set @ ht…
Video Rating: 5 / 5




Read more about [292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dN5oiP9fD2Y/mqdefault.jpg


[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth

Abby Martin Breaks the Set on the Ted Cruz Coloring Book, the Nuclear Energy Alternative, NSA Gamers, and Buzzsaw’s Tyrel Ventura. LIKE Breaking the Set @ ht…
Video Rating: 5 / 5




Read more about [292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth

[292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth
http://img.youtube.com/vi/dN5oiP9fD2Y/0.jpg


Abby Martin Breaks the Set on the Ted Cruz Coloring Book, the Nuclear Energy Alternative, NSA Gamers, and Buzzsaw’s Tyrel Ventura. LIKE Breaking the Set @ ht…
Video Rating: 5 / 5




Read more about [292] Propaganda for Kids, a Revolutionary Nuclear Savior, Conspiracy to Tell the Truth and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, November 11, 2013

In "Fire And Forget," Vets-Turned-Writers Tell Their War Stories





U.S. Army soldiers begin their journey home from Iraq on July 13, 2010.



Maya Alleruzzo/AP

U.S. Army soldiers begin their journey home from Iraq on July 13, 2010.



U.S. Army soldiers begin their journey home from Iraq on July 13, 2010.


Maya Alleruzzo/AP



This Veterans Day, considers these lines from the preface to Fire And Forget, a collection of short stories by veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan:



On the one hand, we want to remind you … of what happened … and insist you recollect those men and women who fought, bled, and died in dangerous and far-away places. On the other hand, there’s nothing most of us would rather do than leave these wars behind. No matter what we do next, the soft tension of the trigger pull is something we’ll carry with us forever.






Fire and Forget



Fire and Forget

Short Stories from the Long War


by Roy Scranton and Matt Gallagher



Paperback, 234 pages | purchase





Veterans Roy Scranton and Jacob Siegel edited the collection, and each have a story in it.


Scranton served in the army from 2002 to 2006 and was deployed to Iraq from 2003 to 2004. He’s currently a Ph.D. candidate in the Princeton University English Department. Siegel is a captain in the New York National Guard, which he joined not long after Sept. 11. He served in Iraq from 2006 to 2007 and in Afghanistan from 2011 to 2012. He edits The Daily Beast’s Hero Project blog, which showcases the writing of veterans and covers issues pertaining to vets. Siegel and Scranton first met through the NYU Veterans Writing Workshop. They join Fresh Air‘s Terry Gross to talk about the experience of war and the challenges of telling their stories.


Interview Highlights


On the conflict soldiers sometimes face when telling war stories


Siegel: I think there’s this continuous media appetite for war as narratives of derring-do and of heroism, which is part of it. And then there’s an appetite for war where soldiers are just pawns in various political polemics. It’s all for people who often, to the soldier, seem like they have no genuine interest in what it’s really like, they just want to be entertained or have their opinions validated.


… I think there’s always a feeling among soldiers that what you bring home with you and what happened overseas may be something only you or your group will understand, and that any attempt to bring it to a larger audience or to tell the story of it is, in effect, a cheapening of it and a way of selling it rather than sharing it.


On coping with the fear of death on and off the battlefield


Scranton: I found that I had to shut down my imagination because it really turned into an enemy. The kind of daydreaming and extrapolation of ideas that I love to indulge in as a reader and as a writer was suddenly and completely maladaptive to the situation in Baghdad. The more I could imagine what could happen, the more different ways I thought I could die or fail or mess things up and it just would turn paralyzing. That’s where I started to tell myself that it doesn’t matter: “None of it matters; you’re already dead. Just get through your job.”




The kind of daydreaming and extrapolation of ideas that I love to indulge in as a reader and as a writer was suddenly and completely maladaptive to the situation in Baghdad.





Siegel: For me, I didn’t think about death, the meaning of death, my own death; I thought about death in objects. It produced for me a fear of objects, of things; an adaptive fear. … You want to see a rock for a rock and an IED for an IED, and so the fear, in those situations, of death is the fear of the thing that brings death. It’s the fear of the instrument of death. And that was a powerful thing and something that created a kind of discipline in the mind in a certain way that was utterly exhausting.


On what, as a writer, Scranton hoped to gain from the war experience


Scranton: [I wanted] to be able to write with authority about war, about history, about love and life and so on. I think there’s a common sense, especially when it comes to the way we think about the culture we live in, that we sort of live in a mass media spectacle. The real stuff happens in Iraq or somewhere else. Real life is not here where we’re on the Internet and where we’re on our phones and where we’re watching TV.



That’s a myth about war and about the way we live today that is immensely powerful, and I totally believed it and I wanted to go “over there”, wherever “over there” was, and encounter that reality with my body, with my existence [and] face danger, death and all the supposedly real, authentic things about war.


On the place of guns in the daily life of a soldier


Siegel: Wanting to carry a gun has almost nothing to do with – or nothing to do with — why I enlisted. … Guns are obviously the single most important instrument of warfare, they’re certainly the most symbolically potent instruments of warfare, but they don’t feel so much different than these other tools that you’re using.


In the Army, you talk about your “kit,” and it’s basically the stuff that you carry and it consists of your radio, your frag[mentation] grenades and your first aid pouch and your gun. … [Guns] didn’t feel to me so much different than those other parts of it, up until the point where it was engaged and then it did feel different.




Arts & Life



In "Fire And Forget," Vets-Turned-Writers Tell Their War Stories

Saturday, November 9, 2013

Tell us your Obamacare stories


Karen Bleier / AFP – Getty Images



A woman looks at the HealthCare.gov insurance exchange internet site showing a “Please wait” page, in this October 1, 2013 file photo in Washington, DC.




By Lisa Myers
Senior Investigative Correspondent, NBC News


The rollout of Obamacare has been bumpy, to say the least, and many Americans continue to express confusion about their healthcare coverage and what 2014 holds.


As we look to help readers of NBCNews.com stay informed on the latest news around the rollout of Healthcare.gov and the Affordable Care Act, we’re asking for your help: Have you heard from your personal health insurance company about premiums for next year, and how much they are rising or falling? For those of you who get health insurance via your employer, are your premiums going up or down?



And how is the plan you are offered changing? For example, is there a difference in what is “in network” and what is “out of network”? Will your deductibles increase or decrease? And are you eligible for a subsidy through Obamacare?


If you’ve been surprised by the latest news from your insurer or employer, or by how the ACA is affecting your bottom line, NBC News wants to hear from you. Submit your story via email by clicking on this address.


More from NBC News Investigations:


Follow NBC News Investigations on Twitter and Facebook 



Investigate this!


Read and vote on readers’ story tips and suggested topics for investigation or submit your own.





Investigations



Tell us your Obamacare stories

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Facebook is Doomed: Forrester Says Ads Tell a Sad Story

Facebook is Doomed: Forrester Says Ads Tell a Sad Story
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/f7bff__3d6a02b6-a89d-43ba-a48a-17f2cc000e72_screen-shot-2013-10-28-at-5-41-07-pm.png



By Jim Edwards, Business Insider 


Forrester, the respected market research group, has just published a brutal report on Facebook (FB) based on a survey of 395 marketing executives. The conclusion: “Facebook creates less business value than any other digital marketing opportunity … [so] … Don’t dedicate a paid ad budget for Facebook.”


Facebook responded that the report was “illogical and … irresponsible.”


The research company published a blog post discussing the report here. But we’ve seen the full report, and it’s grim reading for Facebook. The social network ranked last among a range of online tactics that 395 executives were asked to choose from:



Forrester Analyst Nate Elliott concludes:


Facebook creates less business value than any other digital marketing opportunity. We asked 395 executives from the US, the UK, and Canada how satisfied they were with the business value they get from 13 different online marketing sites and tactics. You’d expect a site boasting the largest audience and the biggest collection of data to fare well. But we found that Facebook offered less value than anything else on our list …. The least valuable tactic within Facebook? Those paid ads onto which Facebook has shifted focus.


To be fair, Facebook still scored a 3.54 out of a possible five marks in total. But note that Google, Yahoo and LinkedIn all scored higher among ad clients:



Forrester then pours salt on the wound, and recommends advertisers not create a dedicated budget for Facebook:


If you want to buy ads on Facebook, rely on facts rather than faith. We’ve no doubt that for some marketers targeting some audiences, Facebook advertising can work. If the site really performs well compared with your other media buys, go ahead and spend money there. But marketers tell us Facebook ads generate less business value than display ads on other sites. It’s time to make decisions based on facts, not on faith or fascination. You’re just buying display ads! Don’t dedicate a paid ad budget for Facebook. Make it compete with other media buys based on performance, just as you would any other site.


… We don’t believe that Facebook will make the changes needed to win back marketers’ hearts. In fact, we don’t believe the company even sees the need to change: Its enormous revenues have blinded it to marketers’ growing dissatisfaction. But if it doesn’t change, the results will be dire:


Facebook responded in an email to Business Insider:


While we agree that the promise of social media is still in process, the conclusions in this report are at times illogical and at others irresponsible. The reality is that Facebook advertising works. That’s why we have more than a million active advertisers including all of the Ad Age 100. And, countless studies have demonstrated the significant return on investment marketers see from Facebook. Our promise is to continue to deliver positive results for marketers.


The report has its flaws, of course. For instance, it claims, “The smart money will leave Facebook. A handful of notable brands have drawn first blood, announcing they’re leaving Facebook entirely.” But it cites only two clients — General Motors (GM) and Mark Cuban — and GM already started advertising on Facebook again.


Disclosure: The author owns Facebook stock.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/forrester-report-says-dont-dedicate-a-paid-ad-budget-for-facebook-2013-10#ixzz2j7XgKZvF




Yahoo Finance: The Daily Ticker




Read more about Facebook is Doomed: Forrester Says Ads Tell a Sad Story and other interesting subjects concerning Commentary at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, October 13, 2013

"It is time to tell Congress to go to hell"


Federal judges, long used to being blasted as “judicial activists” by members of Congress, are now directing a stream of anger and vitriol right back at Capitol Hill.


Driving judges’ ire: the budget austerity and chaos lawmakers have imposed on the judiciary. Jurists say funding for the courts has already been cut to the bone by way of sequestration — and now the government shutdown has added insult to injury, leaving the government’s third branch running on fumes that likely won’t last out the week.



“It is time to tell Congress to go to hell,” Senior U.S. District Court Judge Richard Kopf wrote on his blog last week. “It’s the right thing to do.”


(PHOTOS: House GOP meets on shutdown, debt deal)


Kopf, a George H.W. Bush appointee who sits in Lincoln, Neb., urged his fellow judges to evade the shutdown by designating all their staff as essential and exempt from furlough.


“Given the loss of employees already suffered by the judiciary on account of the sequester and otherwise, why shouldn’t every remaining employee of every federal district court (including [federal public defenders]) be declared ‘essential?’” the judge asked.


“Such an order would set up an inter-branch dispute worth having….[Congress] could do nothing, in which event Congress loses its ability to destroy the judiciary [by] failing to pass a budget. Or, Congress could go batshit and the judiciary and Congress could have it out,” he said.


(PHOTOS: 25 great shutdown quotes)


Such exasperation is even creeping into judicial rulings.


When lawyers for the House urged Judge Amy Berman Jackson to keep a case demanding Operation Fast and Furious-related records from Attorney General Eric Holder moving forward during the shutdown, the judge said lawmakers could cool their heels, just like others with claims pending against the government.


“While the vast majority of litigants who now must endure a delay in the progress of their matters do so due to circumstances beyond their control, that cannot be said of the House of Representatives, which has played a role in the shutdown that prompted the stay motion,” Jackson wrote.


Even before the shutdown, the judiciary shed nearly 2,700 support staff positions over the past two years. Funding for drug testing and electronic monitoring of pre-trial detainees had also been slashed by 20 percent, and federal defenders were under orders to take about 15 days of unpaid furlough in the past year.


(PHOTOS: 18 times the government has shut down)


The cuts have caused delays in criminal and civil cases. Even the posting of judge’s orders has slowed, with many federal court clerk’s offices looking largely empty compared with a few years ago.


Sequestration cut $ 350 million, or about 5 percent, from the judiciary’s budget in the past fiscal year, bringing it to about $ 6.6 billion annually.


Judges themselves are effectively exempt from furlough because the Constitution says their salaries — currently $ 174,000 for district court judges — cannot be reduced.


For the past two weeks, the federal courts have essentially operated on fumes, using funds from filing fees and so-called no-year appropriations to pay salaries and keep the lights on. Court budget personnel now predict that money will run out on Thursday or Friday of this week. After that, work deemed essential will continue, but there will be no way to pay employees, contractors or utilities until Congress passes legislation including temporary or year-long funding.


(PHOTOS: D.C. closes up shop)


The chief judge of the U.S. District Court located just blocks from the Capitol building said that the shutdown’s funding lapse, piled on top of two years of tight budgets and staff reductions, has prompted his colleagues’ frustration level to rise.


“I have to say it’s fairly high,” Judge Richard Roberts said in an interview with POLITICO Friday. “Court budgets have essentially been slashed to the bone, with us losing nationwide thousands of judicial employees performing very important tasks…We’re being told to furlough where we’re already cut to the bone.”


Back on Capitol Hill, earlier complaints had drawn some skepticism.


At a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing in July, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) suggested some of sequestration’s impacts on the courts were being exaggerated.


“Congress voted and [the] American people seem quite comfortable with the idea that we can reduce spending for a little while around here instead of having steady growth and they’re not panicked, and I know we have stories that there’s not enough copy paper in a clerk’s office somewhere. Well, I would say…you need a new clerk. It’s like those school people that would require the students to bring in toilet paper because they can’t find enough money to do that, or fix their roof. That’s a mismanagement to me.”


Sessions said electronic filing systems should allow the courts to shed some clerks, but he acknowledged that the sequester did force some cuts more abruptly than made sense, particularly to federal public defender services.


“You’ve been asked…to take reductions more rapidly than smart people would ask you to take it,” he said.


Now, with the shutdown taking its own toll on the system, House Judiciary Committee Democrats staged a forum on Capitol Hill last week to draw attention to what they portrayed as a crisis in funding for the courts.


The Judiciary Committee’s top Democrat, Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, called the impact of the cuts and the shutdown on the courts “grave and growing each day.”




POLITICO – TOP Stories



"It is time to tell Congress to go to hell"

Thursday, October 10, 2013

Money Morals: Should I tell my children that I intend to cut them out of my will?


By Money morals


|


In our Money Morals series we invite readers to help solve a dilemma. This week, should you tell families members that they won’t, in fact, be getting anything when you die?


I’m 78 and for more than twenty years I have had a will that splits my estate, which is my house plus a small amount of cash savings, between my second wife (roughly half), and son and daughter from my first marriage (roughly a quarter each).


My three grand children would get small amounts from my cash savings, running to a few thousand pounds each at the moment.


Generation game: Should our reader tell his grown up children that they won;t be getting an inheritance?

Generation game: Should our reader tell his grown up children that they won;t be getting an inheritance?



However, my wife recently passed away so I assume that her share will now go to my children.


But I am seriously considering changing my will to remove my two children and have their shares split three ways between the grandchildren. It means each grandchild would get about £90,000 each if my house sells for the expected amount after I die.


I have not been close to my children, both now in their 40s, for the past ten to fifteen years since divorcing their mother and marrying my second wife. Neither is in desperate need of the money and I have no particular desire for them to benefit.


Whilst I am happy to remove them from the will and put the estate in trust until each of the grandchildren reaches 18, I worry that my children will try to challenge the will, or persuade the grandchildren to hand all or some of the money to them.


Should I tell my children now that I intend to cut them out of my will and do not want them to benefit? 


  • Send us a Money Moral: Have you got a dilemma for readers to tackle? Email editor@thisismoney.co.uk with Money Moral in the subject line.






Money | Mail Online



Money Morals: Should I tell my children that I intend to cut them out of my will?

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Behind the Burrito: 5 Things Chipotle"s Ads Don"t Tell You

Chipotle Mexican Grill, the popular burrito chain that has more than 1,500 restaurants worldwide, hit the advertising jackpot earlier this month when it released a Pixar-style commercialthat went viral and turned the restaurant into an overnight poster child for sustainable food. The advertisement, set to a mournful Fiona Apple song, depicts an animated scarecrow discovering the truth about factory farms—and then deciding to start his own  farm instead (the scarecrow’s farm is apparently vegetarian, because the animals magically disappear.)


The restaurant chain has pushed hard to separate its image from McDonald’s, a former investor in the company, and revamp itself as a sustainable-food choice for Americans who are against global warming and antibiotics, and in favor of fresh, locally-sourced food. In its advertisements, the company throws around the word “natural” a lot—but unlike “organic,” that doesn’t have an actual USDA definition. So how well does Chipotle actually stack up? In an email, Chris Arnold, a spokesman for Chipotle, tells Mother Jones that, “Chipotle is probably more transparent about the ingredients we use than any other national restaurant company. We have never professed to being perfect. Rather, the commitment we have made is to constant improvement, and we are always working to find better, more sustainable sources for all of the ingredients we use.”


Here are five questions raised in Chipotle advertisements:


1. Does Chipotle support genetically modified organisms (GMOs)?



One of the main characters in Chipotle’s scarecrow video is a creepy bird that flies around the factory farm and appears to be some kind of hybrid between a crow and a robot. In another scene, bird-robots are pumping mysterious chemicals into a chicken, inflating it like a beach ball. The video clearly implies that messing with Mother Nature is bad news—and Chipotle doesn’t do it. Arnold says that “the film is about a host of issues in agriculture and industrial food production—the overuse of antibiotics, harsh crowding of animals, and the high degree to which so much food is processed. But there are no GMO references, either literal or symbolic.”


According to its website, most of Chipotle’s products contain Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), which accelerate the pesticides arms race and have not been adequately tested for long-term health effects. Chipotle has taken the laudable step of publicly backing GMO labeling and aiming to “eliminate GMOs from Chipotle’s ingredients”—but the restaurant isn’t there yet. According to Chipotle’s website, all soy bean oil and corn products contain GMOs. That doesn’t sound so bad, except that Chipotle chicken, steak, fajita vegetables, rice, tortilla chips and tortillas all contain one or both of these items (Restaurants in the New York metropolitan area are an exception; they don’t use soy bean oil.) Additionally, Arnold tells Mother Jones that the feed given to cows and pigs “very well could be GMO, given the prevalence of GMO crops in this country. Non-GMO feed is not part of our protocol.”


2. Do Chipotle pigs, chickens, and cows frolic in big grassy fields?



The scarecrow ad wasn’t the first time Chipotle has pushed the message that its animals frolic in fields (to pop music.) In 2011, it released the animated commercial above, set to a Coldplay song. Arnold, the Chipotle spokesman, says “I think the way we portray our suppliers is very consistent with how they operate in reality” and that Chipotle uses “a number of naturally raised meat suppliers.” Pork suppliers that fall under “naturally raised meat” are Niman Ranch Pork Company and Du Breton, both of which Chipotle sources from (you can see a Chipotle video with the founder of Niman Ranch here.) Niman Ranch’s website says the farm takes many admirable steps to ensure its pigs are ethically raised, such as giving them a 100% vegetarian diet, veterinarian care, and allowing sows to have 64 square feet to share with their young. But the image in the commercial, that all the pigs are hanging out in a pasture, might not be accurate. Pigs at Niman Ranch aren’t required to have outdoor access. They can be housed in hoop buildings with sunlight, instead. “Growing and finishing hogs”—the kind that you eat—are only required to have 8 to 18 square feet of space each, depending on weight, if they are housed in a structure that permits outdoor access. In cases where pigs are housed in hoop buildings, they only get 5 to 14 square feet. Access to to pasture or fields is “recommended” but not required. Drew Calvert, Niman Ranch’s director of communications, tells Mother Jones that “We cannot speak to Chipotle’s advertising, claims or videos” and “the number of farmers who raise hogs for Niman Ranch fluctuates, but a majority of the farmers raise animals outdoors.”


The New Yorker also reports that some of Chipotle’s beef is bought from Meyer Natural Foods, which finishes feeding cows in feedlots—so the beef isn’t 100 percent grass-fed (Arnold said over the phone that most of Chipotle’s beef is “raised on pasture” but not 100-percent grass fed.) Meyer’s website doesn’t list a requirement for square-feet of space for cattle, instead it says its farms must meet the more subjective, “adequate space for comfort” standard (Meyer did not immediately respond to request for comment.) Arnold also noted that “Chickens are raised in chicken houses, but with more space per bird than conventionally raised chicken [in factory farms.]“


3. Are most Chipotle ingredients locally sourced?



This clever billboard implies that if Chipotle were to talk about all of its “locally sourced” ingredients, it wouldn’t fit on a snappy advertisement (again, “natural” has no federally regulated definition and can mean virtually anything.) Chipotle’s definition for “locally sourced” means that an ingredient was grown no more than 350 miles from a restaurant—which is 50 miles closer than the USDA recommendation—a worthy goal. But right now, the only locally sourced ingredients at Chipotle are onions, avocados, peppers, tomatoes, jalapenos, and cilantro—all of which are mixed with non-local items to produce the items you see on the menu. And all of which could probably fit on a billboard, with plenty of room. Arnold, the Chipotle spokesman, says using “local” in its advertisements is not misleading, because “When we advertise programs like this (whether our local produce program or our naturally raised meat program), we do it only when those things are available. Unfortunately, we can’t get local produce year-round.” He does note that Chipotle will have used more than 15 million pounds of local produce this year.


4. Does Chipotle ever use animals that are given antibiotics ?




Factory farms use antibiotics on animals to promote growth, even in the face of terrible health conditions. The resulting “super bugs” can even have harmful effects on humans—for example, women have started getting urinary tract infections that are resistant to antibiotics, a problem that is being attributed to chicken factory farming. Steve Ells, Chipotle founder, chairman and co-CEO, said in a statement in August that, “We decided to start serving meat from animals that have never been given antibiotics or added hormones more than a decade ago… And we continue to be committed to the elimination of antibiotics that are used to promote growth in livestock being raised in confinement operations.” Right now, Chipotle allows animals that are sick to be given antibiotics, but they are not permitted to return to Chipotle’s supply and are instead sold as conventional meat. Ells said the company is “willing to consider” allowing animals to rejoin after they’ve been treated with antibiotics. Only about 80 percent of Chipotle beef is raised without antibiotics (or growth hormones) because of supply shortages—the rest is sourced from conventional farms, although Chipotle tries to notify customers when that is the case.


5. Is most Chipotle food organic?



 


Chipotle regularly brags about its organic cilantro, its cotton products, and how it’s doing more than the rest of the industry to promote organic food. And that may be true—but organic pickings at Chipotle are still slim (Arnold, the Chipotle spokesman, says “Twitter is somewhat limited for communications like that because of the 140-character limit, but I don’t think they ever imply that our food is ‘organic.’”) According to Chipotle’s website, the only organic items—unlike the word “natural”, organic has a strict USDA definition—are beans, oregano, avocado and cilantro, and potentially jalapenos and rice. And judging by Chipotle’s Twitter account, Chipotle isn’t revealing on its website that ingredients, like beans, labeled “organic” are not entirely organic. (Arnold argues, “We are quite careful in labeling these things so our customers know what we have and where.”)



So if you’re headed off to lunch after reading this article, and you want to eat organic, avoid GMOs, and get food that’s locally sourced—your best best is to go to a grocery store, read the labels very carefully, and make a sandwich. But if that’s not an option, you’re far better off going to Chipotle than McDonalds, where if you order a burger—literally just a bun, meat and Big Mac sauce—you’re eating more than 60 ingredients. Good luck, America.


 


 


 


 



Politics | Mother Jones



Behind the Burrito: 5 Things Chipotle"s Ads Don"t Tell You