Showing posts with label nominees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nominees. Show all posts

Friday, July 19, 2013

Senate"s Handshake Deal On Obama Nominees Not As Ironclad As You Might Think


When senators struck a bipartisan deal earlier this week to avert a filibuster rules change by Democrats, what exactly did they agree to, and how would it be enforced?


The agreement, negotiated by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), was that Republicans would clear the way for seven of President Obama’s picks to lead federal agencies and departments. No more filibusters by Republicans on those seven. The catch, for Obama, was that he would have to withdraw his two recess-appointed nominees to the National Labor Relations Board and replace them with new nominees.


Although top Democratic aides say they expect Republicans to follow through, the agreement is less than ironclad and could potentially fall apart if any of the nominees don’t receive the 60 votes needed to break a filibuster. In that scenario, the only tool Reid would have is to resort to the same nuclear option to change the rules that the deal was meant to avoid in the first place.


A sign of the agreement’s fragility came Wednesday afternoon when the nomination of Tom Perez for labor secretary overcame the GOP filibuster on a 60-40 vote. One fewer vote and he’d have been blocked, essentially voiding the agreement.


The two NLRB nominations will be the true test of whether the agreement holds. President Obama has withdrawn Sharon Block and Richard Griffin to the board, and instead nominated Nancy Schiffer, the associate general counsel for AFL-CIO, and Kent Hirozawa, the chief counsel to NLRB’s chairman Mark Pearce.


The agreement was that those two nominees would be fast-tracked and reported out of committee in lieu of the usual potentially lengthy vetting process, according to a Senate aide. Reid’s office says the nominees would have to be confirmed by Aug. 27 and insists that the deal requires Republicans to permit cloture on any individuals selected by Obama. GOP leadership aides dispute the last part.


“We certainly haven’t agreed to that,” said one senior Senate Republican aide. “I don’t know about everyone. We’ll have hearings.”


Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), who is protecting his right flank as he faces reelection next year, is publicly downplaying the idea that he was circumvented in the negotiations. According to Roll Call, he privately expressed frustration to his members that he could have gotten a better deal, and presented a version of events that caused Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) to cry “bullshit” during a closed-door meeting.


Democrats are instead counting on McCain and a cohort of more moderate Republicans to deliver the votes. If they don’t, Reid has made amply clear that he retains his right to go nuclear. At the end of the day, that’s the only real backstop Democrats have to ensure that existing and future executive nominations are gummed up by the minority.


As Reid posted on Twitter after the deal was struck:


The deal has held so far. The Senate voted 66-34 on Tuesday to confirm Richard Cordray to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (an agency Republicans wish never existed); 82-17 on Wednesday to end the filibuster of Fred Hochberg to lead the Export-Import Bank; and 54-46 on Thursday to confirm Perez. The Senate voted 69-31 on Thursday to advance Gina McCarthy’s nomination to the Environmental Protection Agency.


McConnell publicly characterized the deal as a positive step, even as he voted to filibuster Cordray, Hochberg, Perez and McCarthy.



Sahil Kapur

Sahil Kapur is a congressional reporter for TPM. He previously covered politics and public policy for numerous publications including The Guardian and The Huffington Post. He can be reached at sahil [at] talkingpointsmemo.com.





submit to reddit




TPM News



Senate"s Handshake Deal On Obama Nominees Not As Ironclad As You Might Think

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Senate reaches deal on Obama nominees, filibusters




Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM) speaks to reporters after a policy luncheons as he is flanked by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) at Capitol Hill in Washington, July 16, 2013. REUTERS/Jose Luis Magana


1 of 7. Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM) speaks to reporters after a policy luncheons as he is flanked by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) at Capitol Hill in Washington, July 16, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Jose Luis Magana






WASHINGTON | Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:40pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Senate Democrats backed away on Tuesday from a possible historic crackdown on filibusters in exchange for a Republican commitment not to use the procedural hurdles to stop some of President Barack Obama’s long-stalled nominations.


The bipartisan agreement, reached after days of talks and jockeying for political position, will allow Obama to fill out his second-term team with top administrators overseeing efforts to protect workers, consumers and the environment.


It will also permit Republicans to retain their right to stop future nominees with filibusters, which have been used for years by the Senate’s minority party against the majority.


“They (Republicans) are not sacrificing their right to filibuster, and we for damn sure aren’t sacrificing our right to change the rules” to ban them, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, declared after tense negotiations.


Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, said, “Put this down as progress in the right direction.”


Obama praised the compromise, saying in a statement, “I’m pleased that the Senate took action today to move forward on the nominees who have waited far too long for a vote.”


But it was unclear how much progress there was, and when another partisan fight would break out in the highly divided and often gridlocked Senate.


Republican Senator John McCain, who helped negotiate the deal, said, “People walked to the edge of the abyss and then we walked back.”


“I don’t know that this is going to come again anytime soon. It may, depending on what goes on in the Senate,” said McCain.


The first concrete sign of agreement came when the Senate, on a vote of 71-29, with 17 Republicans joining all 52 Democrats and two independents, cleared the way for an up-or-down vote on Obama’s choice of Richard Cordray to serve as director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.


A few hours later, the Senate confirmed Cordray by 66-34, ending Republican vows to oppose him until structural changes were made in the agency that was created in 2011 to crack down on Wall Street abuses and protect consumers from financial scams.


ORGANIZED LABOR’S INPUT


As part of the agreement, Democrats yielded to Republican demands that Obama withdraw two nominees to the National Labor Relations Board and offer new ones. The NLRB oversees union elections and enforces labor laws.


Obama on Tuesday nominated Nancy Schiffer, a former associate general counsel at the AFL-CIO labor organization, and Kent Hirozawa, chief counsel to NLRB chairman Mark Pearce, withdrawing two previous nominations. Republicans have agreed to allow the new choices to be confirmed by August 1, aides said.


“I’m pleased that the administration is going to send up two (new) nominees,” McConnell said. “There will be an effort made to get them up for votes before the August recess.”


Republicans had long urged Obama to replace the two earlier NLRB nominees, Sharon Block and Richard Griffin, who were temporarily appointed to the board by Obama in January 2012. A federal court invalidated the appointments. The case is on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.


The Senate is set to vote on Wednesday on Fred Hochberg’s nomination as president of the U.S. Export-Import Bank, and in coming days on the nominations of Thomas Perez to be labor secretary and Gina McCarthy to lead the Environmental Protection Agency.


Democrats have received assurances all three will be confirmed, aides said.


McCain and Democratic Senator Charles Schumer, who crafted a landmark immigration bill earlier this year, came together again to find a compromise on nominations.


Their talks intensified following a closed-door meeting attended by all 100 senators on Monday night where differences were aired and members of both sides spoke out against changing the rules on filibusters.


“We came to an agreement that we shouldn’t change the rules, but we should let the agencies function,” Schumer said.


“I am hopeful that this would set a better tone not just for the seven on the list here, but for all future appointments,” Schumer said.


Filibusters have long been a tool in the Senate to permit the minority to extend debate and pressure the majority to compromise.


But in recent years, each side, when in the majority, has accused the minority of using the filibuster to create partisan gridlock rather than to find bipartisan solutions.


Without an agreement, Democrats, who control the Senate, 54-46, said their aim would have been to reduce to 51 from 60 the number of votes needed to end filibusters against executive branch nominees.


Normally 67 votes are needed to change Senate rules, but Democrats could do it with just 51 under “the nuclear option,” which would involve a ruling by the Democratic chair, which is often filled by Vice President Joe Biden, the chamber’s president.


(Additional Reporting by David Lawder and Susan Cornwell; Editing by Fred Barbash and Peter Cooney)






Reuters: Politics



Senate reaches deal on Obama nominees, filibusters

Obama submits new labor board nominees to Senate




WASHINGTON | Tue Jul 16, 2013 8:57pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – As part of its bargain to avert a Senate battle over procedural rules, the White House on Tuesday nominated two labor lawyers for the National Labor Relations Board, replacing two previous nominees.


President Barack Obama named Nancy Schiffer and Kent Hirozawa as nominees to the five-member board, which oversees union elections and enforces labor laws, the aide said.


Under the Senate deal, lawmakers will move forward in bringing up for a vote a slate of stalled nominees including current NLRB Chairman Mark Gaston Pearce; labor secretary- nominee Thomas Perez; Environmental Protection Agency nominee Gina McCarthy, Export-Import Bank president-nominee Fred Hochberg, and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau director-nominee Richard Cordray.


The Senate confirmed Cordray on Tuesday.


The NLRB was at the center of a broader struggle on Tuesday over those nominees and the Senate’s procedural rules. Democrats had threatened to strip Republicans of their power to block Obama nominations with procedural roadblocks known as filibusters.


A battleground for years between pro-labor Democrats and anti-union Republicans, the NLRB has not had a full Senate-confirmed complement of members for nearly a decade.


Sharon Block and Richard Griffin, who had been nominated for the board and were serving as NLRB members without Senate confirmation, were dropped as nominees and replaced with Schiffer and Hirozawa, the White House said.


As their end of the bargain, Republican lawmakers have agreed in writing not to block a confirmation vote to be held by the end of July on Schiffer and Hirozawa, aides said.


Communications Workers of America President Larry Cohen praised the Senate’s step toward ending gridlock, but lamented that Block and Griffin were casualties in the process.


“The president nominates people he supports and believes in, and it will be two people who believe as strongly as Block and Griffin that workers’ rights matter in the 21st century whether they have a union or not, and most don’t,” Cohen said.


(Editing by Kevin Drawbaugh and Peter Cooney)






Reuters: Politics



Obama submits new labor board nominees to Senate

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Senator vows to delay Obama"s nominees over Libya

FILE – In this Jan. 31, 2013 file photo Sen. Lindsey Graham, D-S.C., questions former Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel, President Barack Obama’s Secretary of Defense nominee, during Hagel’s confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington. On a Sunday, Feb. 10, 2013, talk show Graham threatened to hold up Hagel’s Senate confirmation, and that of John Brennan as CIA director, until the White House provides more answers about the deadly September 11 attack against a US diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

FILE – In this Jan. 31, 2013 file photo Sen. Lindsey Graham, D-S.C., questions former Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel, President Barack Obama’s Secretary of Defense nominee, during Hagel’s confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington. On a Sunday, Feb. 10, 2013, talk show Graham threatened to hold up Hagel’s Senate confirmation, and that of John Brennan as CIA director, until the White House provides more answers about the deadly September 11 attack against a US diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

FILE – In this Dec. 21, 2012, file photo Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., speaks during a Capitol Hill news conference in Washington about the investigation of the deadly Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. On a Sunday, Feb. 10, 2013, talk show Graham threatened to hold up Hagel’s Senate confirmation, and that of John Brennan as CIA director, until the White House provides more answers about the deadly September 11 attack against a US diplomatic facility in Benghazi, Libya. (AP Photo/Ann Heisenfelt, File)

Buy AP Photo Reprints

(AP) — A leading Republican senator said Sunday he would hold up Senate confirmation of President Barack Obama’s nominees to head the Pentagon and the CIA until the White House provided more answers about the Sept. 11 attack against a U.S. installation in Benghazi, Libya.

The White House took aim at South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, a persistent critic of Obama’s response to the terrorist assault, by urging quick approval of the president’s second-term national security team and scolding any lawmakers trying to “play politics” with critical nominations.

Graham accused the White House of “stonewalling” requests to release more information about the attack that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya. “We’re going to get to the bottom of Benghazi,” he told CBS’ “Face the Nation.”

A Democratic colleague branded Graham’s threat to stall the nominations of former Sen. Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., to be defense secretary and John Brennan, Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser, to be CIA director as “unprecedented and unwarranted.” Senators should have the chance to vote on the fate of those nominees, said Sen. Jack Reed of Rhode Island.

The White House did not address Graham’s demand for more information, but did note that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified Thursday before Congress about the chaotic day of the Sept. 11 attack.

In January Graham had signaled he would delay Brennan’s pick and told Fox News he would “absolutely” block Hagel unless Panetta and Dempsey testified about the Benghazi attack. The senator said he was “happy as a clam” when he learned the hearing with Panetta and Dempsey had been scheduled.

Republicans have accused the Obama administration of an election-year cover-up of the attack and at the hearing several suggested the commander in chief was disengaged as Americans died.

“We know nothing about what the president did on the night of September 11th during a time of national crisis, and the American people need to know what their commander in chief did, if anything, during this eight-hour attack,” Graham said on CBS.

Graham contended that a six-person rescue team was delayed from leaving the Benghazi airport because of problems “with the militias releasing them and a lot of bureaucratic snafus,” and he said he wants to know whether Obama called any Libyan officials to expedite their mission.

“I don’t think we should allow Brennan to go forward for the CIA directorship, Hagel to be confirmed to secretary of defense until the White House gives us an accounting,” Graham said, adding, “What did he do that night? That’s not unfair. The families need to know, the American people need to know.”

Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the White House’s National Security Council, said, “We believe the Senate should act swiftly to confirm John Brennan and Sen. Hagel. These are critical national security positions and individual members shouldn’t play politics with their nominations.”

Reed said that “to dwell on a tragic incident and use that to block people is not appropriate. To try to find information, to ask legitimate questions, as Senator Graham is doing is completely appropriate. But then to turn around and say, ‘I’m going to disrupt, essentially, the nomination of two key members of the President’s Cabinet,’ I don’t think that’s appropriate, I don’t think it’s warranted, I think it is an overreaction that is not going to serve the best interest going forward of the national security of the United States.”

Graham would have none of it.

“In a constitutional democracy, we need to know what our commander in chief was doing at a time of great crisis, and this White House has been stonewalling the Congress, and I’m going to do everything I can to get to the bottom of this so we’ll learn from our mistakes and hold this president accountable for what I think is tremendous disengagement at a time of national security crisis,” he said.

At the Senate hearing, Panetta testified that he and Dempsey were meeting with Obama when they first learned of the Libya assault. He said the president told them to deploy forces as quickly as possible. Graham asked whether Panetta spoke again to Obama after that first meeting. Panetta said no, but that the White House was in touch with military officials and aware of what was happening. At one point, Graham asked Panetta if he knew what time Obama went to sleep that night. The Pentagon chief said he did not.

Associated Press


Top Headlines


Senator vows to delay Obama"s nominees over Libya