Showing posts with label Cyber. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cyber. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Protected: Major Cyber Security Hiring Now!

Protected: Major Cyber Security Hiring Now!
http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


Short URL: http://www.veteransnewsnow.com/?p=402305


The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VNN or any other VNN authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors or partners. Notices

Posted by on Feb 5 2014, With 0 Reads, Filed under Veterans, Veterans Affairs. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.



To post a comment, you must login using Facebook, Yahoo, AOL, or Hotmail in the box below.
Don’t have a social network account? Register and Login direct with our site and post your comment.
Before you post, read our Comment Policy – Legal Notice



Veterans News Now




Read more about Protected: Major Cyber Security Hiring Now! and other interesting subjects concerning World News at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

France prepares $2 billion ‘cyber war’ defense upgrade

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



France prepares $2 billion ‘cyber war’ defense upgrade

Saturday, January 11, 2014

WIRE: More well-known retailers victims of cyber attacks...

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



WIRE: More well-known retailers victims of cyber attacks...

Thursday, January 2, 2014

FireEye buys cyber forensics firm Mandiant for about $1 billion




BOSTON Thu Jan 2, 2014 9:44pm EST



FireEye Inc. Chairman of the Board, David DeWalt (R) and Founder Ashar Aziz (L) pose with Nasdaq CEO Robert Greifeld outside the Nasdaq Market site in Times Square following the company

FireEye Inc. Chairman of the Board, David DeWalt (R) and Founder Ashar Aziz (L) pose with Nasdaq CEO Robert Greifeld outside the Nasdaq Market site in Times Square following the company’s debut on the Nasdaq exchange in New York, September 20, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid




BOSTON (Reuters) – Cybersecurity company FireEye Inc has acquired Mandiant Corp, the computer forensics specialist best known for unveiling a secretive Chinese military unit believed to be behind a series of hacking attacks on U.S. companies.


FirEye shares jumped more than 20 percent after Thursday’s announcement of the $ 1.05 billion cash-and-stock deal, which FireEye said closed on Monday. It unites two companies with relatively new technologies for thwarting cyber attacks, and brings together two of the most-respected executives in the security industry: FireEye CEO Dave DeWalt and Mandiant founder Kevin Mandia.


While sales of older anti-virus products have been on the decline, security experts expect strong growth in both FireEye’s cloud-based systems for detecting malicious software and Mandiant’s software that analyzes cyber attacks.


About a year ago the two companies entered into a technology development agreement that made it easier to deploy their products together. With the merger, FireEye will gain Mandiant’s team of forensics investigators.


“They have these very strong Navy ‘cyber’ Seals who respond to breaches and are very good at what they do,” DeWalt said about Mandiant. He had previously served as chairman of Mandiant’s board.


“My aim is to create the strongest security company in the world,” DeWalt said in an interview.


FireEye, which has yet to post a profit, said the acquisition will be immediately accretive to earnings and expects the combined company’s revenue to grow about 50 percent this year. In comparison, Symantec Corp, the biggest maker of anti-virus software, has said it expects fiscal 2014 revenue to drop 3 percent to 4 percent.


Mandiant is best known for its forensics services. The company rose to prominence in February 2013 when it published a report detailing what it said were links between a Shanghai-based unit of the People’s Liberation Army and a long list of attacks on U.S. companies. Beijing denied all allegations in the report.


“If you combine FireEye’s advanced persistent threat technology with Mandiant’s endpoint protection, it really makes them a major force in the cyber-security industry,” said FBR analyst Daniel Ives.


Mandiant, which has long been profitable, generates sales of more than $ 100 million a year, according to DeWalt.


FIREYE FORECASTS


Also on Thursday, FireEye announced preliminary revenue for the fourth quarter above its previous estimate. It said fourth-quarter revenue would be between $ 55 million and $ 57 million, compared to its previous estimate of between $ 52 million to $ 54 million.


DeWalt has declined to say when he expects the company to be profitable.


FireEye, which has a market capitalization of around $ 5 billion, will pay for Mandiant with a combination of stock and cash. It issued 21.5 million shares and options, which were worth $ 939 million on Monday, when the stock closed at $ 43.69.


A company spokesman said it had about 140 million shares outstanding after the deal was completed.


It will also pay $ 106.5 million in net cash to Mandiant’s shareholders, who include Mandia as well as Silicon Valley venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and One Equity Partners, the private investment arm of JPMorgan Chase & Co.


Brenon Daly, M&A research director for 451 Group, said that FireEye was paying approximately 10 times Mandiant’s annual revenue. That is about the same revenue multiple that Cisco Systems Inc paid in its $ 2.7 purchase of Sourcefire Inc, last year’s biggest deal in the information security industry, he said.


“This is one of the first time we have seen one of the new high-flying IPOs use the currency generated through the IPO process to pull of this large a transaction,” Daly said.


DeWalt said he owns some shares in Mandiant and will disclose the size of his stake within a few days through a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


FireEye shares rose 23.51 percent in extended trade after closing down 5.69 percent at $ 41.13 on Nasdaq.


FireEye’s rivals include Palo Alto Networks Inc, which went public in 2012 in one of that year’s most successful IPOs.


Mandiant was founded in 2004 by Kevin Mandia, a former U.S. Air Force cyber-forensics investigator who co-authored an influential textbook on the subject. The company made its name by automating processes used to investigate computer breaches.


The company was largely unknown outside the computer security world until February of last year, when it fingered the People’s Liberation Army’s Shanghai-based Unit 61398 as the most likely driving force behind a Chinese hacking group known as


APT1.


Other security companies had published reports on cyberattacks, but had shied away from so clearly identifying their perpetrators.


DeWalt said FireEye would consider releasing similar reports now that it owns Mandiant.


“You will probably see us continue to do it when it is appropriate,” he said. “There is some incredibly egregious behavior.”


DeWalt is the former chief executive of anti-virus software maker McAfee who sold McAfee to Intel Corp.


Mandia was named FireEye’s chief operating officer. He said in an interview that he plans to move to Silicon Valley, where FireEye has its headquarters, from the Washington D.C. area.


“I’m in this for the long-term,” he said. “This is as exciting as heck for me.”


(Additional reporting by Noel Randewich in San Francisco; Editing by Tiffany Wu and Grant McCool)





Reuters: Top News



FireEye buys cyber forensics firm Mandiant for about $1 billion

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Target cyber breach hits 40 million payment cards at holiday peak

Target cyber breach hits 40 million payment cards at holiday peak
http://s1.reutersmedia.net/resources/r/?m=02&d=20131219&t=2&i=822644798&w=580&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE9BI0WZN00





BOSTON Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:06pm EST



Merchandise baskets are lined up outside a Target department store in Palm Coast, Florida, December 9, 2013. REUTERS/Larry Downing

Merchandise baskets are lined up outside a Target department store in Palm Coast, Florida, December 9, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing




BOSTON (Reuters) – Target Corp said hackers have stolen data from up to 40 million credit and debit cards of shoppers who visited its stores during the first three weeks of the holiday season in the second-largest such breach reported by a U.S. retailer.


The hackers worked at unprecedented speed, carrying out their operation from the day before Thanksgiving to this past Sunday, 19 days that are the heart of the crucial Christmas holiday sales season.


Target, the third-largest U.S. retailer, said on Thursday that it was working with federal law enforcement and outside experts to prevent similar attacks in the future. It did not disclose how its systems were compromised.


Target did not detect the attack on its own, according to a person familiar with the investigation.


The retailer was alerted its systems might have been compromised by credit card processors who had noticed a surge in fraudulent transactions involving credit cards that had been used at Target, according to the source, who was not authorized to discuss the matter.


The timing of the breach could not have been worse for Target, coming just before three of the four busiest days of what has been a bruising holiday season for retailers, with the highest level of discounting in years. Target itself last month lowered its profit forecast for the year after disappointing sales in the third quarter.


Complaints from customers began to surface on social media as they learned of it early Thursday morning.


“Most of these attacks are just a cost of doing business,” said Mark Rasch, a former U.S. prosecutor of cyber crimes.


“But an attack that’s targeted against a major retailer during the peak of the Christmas season is much more than that because it undermines confidence.”


Investigators are still trying to understand how the attack was carried out, including whether hackers found a weakness at Target’s own computer network or through credit card services vendors. It was not immediately clear what percent of the transactions at its brick and mortar stores had been compromised but the company said its online business had not been affected.


Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, who headed a multi-state probe into a 2007 data breach at TJX Cos, said in a statement that her office was talking to Target about the breach and how the company is addressing it, and plans to work with other Attorneys General to determine whether the company had proper safeguards in place.


New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman said in a public statement that he had asked Target for more information as well. Lawyers said that there will almost definitely be class action suits against Target.


The affected payment cards include Target’s REDcard private label debit and credit cards as well as other bank cards, Target spokeswoman Molly Snyder told Reuters on Thursday. She declined to say if the incident was affecting store traffic.


The largest breach against a U.S. retailer, uncovered in 2007 at TJX Cos Inc, led to the theft of data from more than 90 million credit cards over about 18 months.


Since then, companies have gotten far more adept at identifying intruders. But criminals have responded by developing more-powerful attack strategies, spending months on reconnaissance to launch highly sophisticated schemes with the goal of extracting as much data as they can in the shortest period of time.


Representatives for J.C. Penney Co Inc, Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Best Buy Co Inc and Home Depot Inc told Reuters they believed their systems had not been compromised in similar attacks.


Target will provide more details on costs related to the issue at a later date, Snyder said. She declined comment when asked if Target expected potential fines from MasterCard, Visa and American Express or saw a possible increase in merchant fees.


“It’s so early in this investigation,” Snyder said.


Avivah Litan, a Gartner analyst who specializes in cyber-security and fraud detection, saw costs for Target. “They are going to pay for any fraud on the card,” she said. “They will get fined (by card issuers) for non-compliance with payment card security standards. Their merchant fee will probably go up a few basis points.”


Target’s shares closed down 2.2 percent at $ 62.15 on the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday afternoon, while the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock index fell 0.06 percent.


ANGRY CUSTOMERS


Target warned customers in an alert on its website that the criminals had stolen names, payment card numbers, expiration dates and security codes.


The company had identified the breach on Sunday and had begun responding to it the same day, Snyder said. She declined to explain why the retailer waited until Thursday to alert customers about the breach.


Krebs on Security, a closely watched security industry blog that broke the news on Wednesday, said the breach involved nearly all of Target’s 1,797 stores in the United States.


The U.S. Secret Service is working on the investigation, according to an agency spokeswoman. A Federal Bureau of Investigation spokeswoman declined to comment.


Unhappy customers began to weigh in early on Thursday, posting complaints on Target’s Facebook page.


“Thank you Target for nearly costing me and my wife our identities, we will never shop or purchase anything in your store again,” said one posting.


“Shop at Target, become a target,” remarked another. “Gee, thanks.”


Target’s Snyder said it has been getting an “extremely high” volume of calls from customers and is adding employees to its call centers to answer questions on security breach.


Krista Brewer, 27, a student at Bridgewater State University at Braintree, Massachusetts, sent Target an email and canceled her credit card on Thursday because she had used it multiple times in recent weeks at the store.


“If they don’t do anything for the customers who had their cards put at risk, such as coupons or a special deal, I think I will avoid shopping there in the future,” she said. “I’m very security conscious, and they aren’t saying exactly how the breech happened.”


JPMorgan Chase & Co, one of the biggest U.S. credit card issuers, said it was monitoring the accounts involved for suspicious activity and urged customers to contact the bank if they noticed any.


An American Express spokeswoman said the company was aware of the incident and was putting fraud controls in place.


Major card brands typically offer their cardholders zero liability and cardholders should contact their issuer if they spot suspicious transactions, a Visa spokesman said, adding that a breached account does not necessarily result in a fraudulent purchase.


“This could hurt the end of the holiday season if for no other reason than many of their customers have to cancel cards ahead of holidays,” said Janney Capital Markets analyst David Strasser.


The breach also comes at a time Target is trying to build its online business, which by some estimates is only 2 percent of sales.


“All consumers will hear is that Target is not a safe place to use your credit card. That impacts trust, which in turn can impact retail’s fastest-growing and most trust-sensitive touch points: online and mobile,” said Carol Spieckerman, president of retail strategy firm newmarketbuilders.


Still, consumers tend to have short memories with these things, so even if it is bad now, it will likely be less of an issue next quarter, said Gartner analyst Litan.


“(Consumers) care more about discounts than security,” she said.


(Additional reporting by Siddharth Cavale, David Henry, Marina Lopes, Phil Wahba and Peter Rudegeair; Editing by Kirti Pandey, Rodney Joyce, Lisa Von Ahn, Jilian Mincer, Peter Henderson, Phil Berlowitz and Bob Burgdorfer)






Reuters: Business News




Read more about Target cyber breach hits 40 million payment cards at holiday peak and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Stuxnet - Cyber Warfare

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Stuxnet - Cyber Warfare

Friday, November 29, 2013

Google Black Friday 2013 deals: a full cyber weekend"s worth


Google is taking part in today’s shopping festivities with deals on the Nexus 7, the Chromecast, and nearly 40 popular selections from the Play Store. From today through what Google’s calling the “Cyber Weekend,” the new Nexus 7 will come with a $ 25 credit for the Play Store, while the Chromecast will come with a $ 6 movie rental credit. Some of the most enticing deals are on games, music, and books though: Kanye West and Robin Thicke’s latest albums are both selling for only $ 1.99, Malcolm Gladwell and Dan Brown’s new books are both available for just under $ 4, and Need for Speed Most Wanted is selling for $ 1.99. You can check out the full selection below:


Gadgets


  • Nexus 7 (2013): $ 229 for 16GB, $ 269 for 32GB, both include $ 25 Google Play credit and free shipping

  • Chromecast: $ 35, includes free shipping and one movie rental of $ 6.00 or less

Games


  • Order & Chaos Online: $ 0.99

  • Choplifter HD: $ 0.99

  • Anodyne: $ 0.99

  • Skylanders Battlegrounds: $ 2.99

  • Need for Speed Most Wanted: $ 1.99

Books



  • David Baldacci’s The Hit: $ 2.49

  • Orson Scott Card’s Ender’s Game: $ 1.99

  • Suzanne Collins’ The Hunger Games Trilogy: $ 12.99

  • Dan Brown’s Inferno: $ 3.99

  • Veronica Roth’s Allegiant: $ 3.49

  • E L James’ 50 Shades Trilogy: $ 7.49

  • Joe Hill’s NOS4A2: $ 3.29

  • Malcolm Gladwell’s David and Goliath: $ 3.79

Music


  • Kanye West’s Yeezus: $ 1.99

  • Eminem’s The Marshall Mathers LP2: $ 4.99

  • Avenged Sevenfold’s Hail to the King: $ 3.99

  • Robin Thicke’s Blurred Lines: $ 1.99

  • Avicii’s True: $ 1.99

  • Fall Out Boy’s Save Rock and Roll: $ 1.99

  • Luke Bryan’s Crash My Party: $ 3.99

  • Darius Rucker’s True Believers:  $ 1.99

Movies



  • Prometheus: $ 7.99

  • Pacific Rim: $ 3.99

  • The Vow: $ 5.99

  • 42: $ 3.99

  • Pain and Gain: $ 4.99

  • The Hangover Part III: $ 3.99

  • We Bought a Zoo: $ 7.99

  • The Great Gatsby: $ 3.99

TV Series



  • It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, season 1: $ 5.99; most other seasons for $ 14.99

  • Scandal, season 1: $ 9.99; season 2: $ 14.99

  • Eleven of this year’s Shark Week specials: $ 9.99

  • Defiance, season 1: $ 9.99

Magazines



  • Wired‘s DesignLife special issue: free

  • Maxim, monthly subscription: $ 1.25; annual subscription: $ 7.49

  • Popular Photography, monthly subscription: $ 1.99; annual subscription: $ 7.49

  • Women’s Health, monthly subscription: $ 2.00; annual subscription: $ 9.99

  • Cooking Light, monthly subscription: $ 1.99; annual subscription $ 9.99

  • Cosmopolitan, January issue: $ 0.99; annual subscription: $ 9.99






The Verge – All Posts



Google Black Friday 2013 deals: a full cyber weekend"s worth

Thursday, November 28, 2013

[276] Hacking Google"s Cyber Tattoo, Weaponizing Anthropology, Unnatural Monogamy

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



[276] Hacking Google"s Cyber Tattoo, Weaponizing Anthropology, Unnatural Monogamy

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Rule Cyber-Britannia: MoD to recruit hundreds of IT warriors for cyber task force



Published time: September 29, 2013 13:28

Reuters / Kacper Pempel

Reuters / Kacper Pempel




Britain’s Defense Ministry has announced it is creating a military cyber unit and has welcomed tech-savvy hackers to consider taking the Queen’s virtual shilling in a recruitment drive starting October.


The UK is channeling part of its military budget on recruiting hundreds of computer experts to constitute the new Joint Cyber Reserve Unit, the country’s Defense Secretary, Philip Hammond, announced Sunday.


For the first time, the UK’s would-be cyber warriors will be tasked with offensive missions.


“In response to the growing cyber threat, we are developing a full-spectrum military cyber capability, including a strike capability, to enhance the UK’s range of military capabilities,” AFP reported Hammond as saying.


The Defense Secretary said he believed that a purely defensive cyber unit was no longer enough for the country’s security. “You deter people by having an offensive capability,” he told The Daily Mail in an interview.


“We will build in Britain a cyber-strike capability so we can strike back in cyberspace against enemies who attack us, putting cyber alongside land, sea, air and space as a mainstream military activity. Our commanders can use cyber weapons alongside conventional weapons in future conflicts.”


Hammond described the ministry’s initiative as “an exciting opportunity” for computer geniuses “to put their skills to good use for the nation.”


Striking a patriotic chord is just part of the strategy for luring IT geeks into the army. Cyber National Guard reservists will be spared the current Territorial Army fitness tests, Hammond said in the interview, where he touted the army going digital as its biggest reform since World War I, when tanks started replacing cavalry.  


Hammond revealed the cyber unit plan to journalists in the MoD’s nuclear bunker, becoming the first Defense Secretary to have been photographed or interviewed there.


“Cyber weapons provide the tantalizing possibility of being able to cripple the enemy without inflicting lasting damage on them. No cities to rebuild, no infrastructure to reconstruct.” Hammond said, adding the innovation was very much in tune with attitudes in the US. “One of my American counterparts put it to me like this: Why would you want to bomb someone’s airfield if you could just switch it off with a cyber-attack?” 


The United States announced in March it was developing 40 new teams of cyber-agents, citing alleged Iranian and Chinese hacker attacks as reason behind the decision. Gen. Keith Alexander, the head of the US Cyber Command who is also in charge of the National Security Agency, announced 13 of the 40 cyber-squads would be devoted toward offensive operations.


Britain’s capability to fully staff its own cyber military force was questioned by a National Audit Office report in February, which revealed a shortage of UK IT experts able to combat cyber-attacks.


The report blamed the government for not promoting science and technology enough and quoted education officials saying that it could take “up to 20 years to address the skills gap at all levels of education.”


The research also questioned the government’s capability to attract IT experts to the public sector from more lucrative private companies.


British MPs have also warned about the country’s susceptibility to cyber-attacks. In January, the House of Commons Defense Select Committee expressed particular alarm that the military were excessively reliant on cyber systems for communication, which could make them an easy target for hackers.




RT – News



Rule Cyber-Britannia: MoD to recruit hundreds of IT warriors for cyber task force

Rule Cyber-Britannia: MoD to recruit hundreds of IT warriors for cyber task force



Published time: September 29, 2013 13:28

Reuters / Kacper Pempel

Reuters / Kacper Pempel




Britain’s Defense Ministry has announced it is creating a military cyber unit and has welcomed tech-savvy hackers to consider taking the Queen’s virtual shilling in a recruitment drive starting October.


The UK is channeling part of its military budget on recruiting hundreds of computer experts to constitute the new Joint Cyber Reserve Unit, the country’s Defense Secretary, Philip Hammond, announced Sunday.


For the first time, the UK’s would-be cyber warriors will be tasked with offensive missions.


“In response to the growing cyber threat, we are developing a full-spectrum military cyber capability, including a strike capability, to enhance the UK’s range of military capabilities,” AFP reported Hammond as saying.


The Defense Secretary said he believed that a purely defensive cyber unit was no longer enough for the country’s security. “You deter people by having an offensive capability,” he told The Daily Mail in an interview.


“We will build in Britain a cyber-strike capability so we can strike back in cyberspace against enemies who attack us, putting cyber alongside land, sea, air and space as a mainstream military activity. Our commanders can use cyber weapons alongside conventional weapons in future conflicts.”


Hammond described the ministry’s initiative as “an exciting opportunity” for computer geniuses “to put their skills to good use for the nation.”


Striking a patriotic chord is just part of the strategy for luring IT geeks into the army. Cyber National Guard reservists will be spared the current Territorial Army fitness tests, Hammond said in the interview, where he touted the army going digital as its biggest reform since World War I, when tanks started replacing cavalry.  


Hammond revealed the cyber unit plan to journalists in the MoD’s nuclear bunker, becoming the first Defense Secretary to have been photographed or interviewed there.


“Cyber weapons provide the tantalizing possibility of being able to cripple the enemy without inflicting lasting damage on them. No cities to rebuild, no infrastructure to reconstruct.” Hammond said, adding the innovation was very much in tune with attitudes in the US. “One of my American counterparts put it to me like this: Why would you want to bomb someone’s airfield if you could just switch it off with a cyber-attack?” 


The United States announced in March it was developing 40 new teams of cyber-agents, citing alleged Iranian and Chinese hacker attacks as reason behind the decision. Gen. Keith Alexander, the head of the US Cyber Command who is also in charge of the National Security Agency, announced 13 of the 40 cyber-squads would be devoted toward offensive operations.


Britain’s capability to fully staff its own cyber military force was questioned by a National Audit Office report in February, which revealed a shortage of UK IT experts able to combat cyber-attacks.


The report blamed the government for not promoting science and technology enough and quoted education officials saying that it could take “up to 20 years to address the skills gap at all levels of education.”


The research also questioned the government’s capability to attract IT experts to the public sector from more lucrative private companies.


British MPs have also warned about the country’s susceptibility to cyber-attacks. In January, the House of Commons Defense Select Committee expressed particular alarm that the military were excessively reliant on cyber systems for communication, which could make them an easy target for hackers.




RT – News



Rule Cyber-Britannia: MoD to recruit hundreds of IT warriors for cyber task force

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Tuesday, September 3, 2013

The U.S. Should Use Cyber Weapons Against Assad

A former deputy assistant secretary for Cyber Security and Communications briefs media at the National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center. (Hyungwon Kang/Reuters)

If the Obama administration does conduct military strikes against Syria, as seems likely, it should use military cyber weapons at the earliest possible moment to show the upside of military cyber power. Though this is risky, as it puts the focus on the U.S. militarization of cyberspace, it is likely worth doing to show that cyber operations are not evil witchcraft but can be humanitarian. 


This is not the first time the United States has been here. In 1999, the White House was reported to have initially approved a plan for covert “computer attacks on foreign bank accounts held by [Slobodan] Milosevic and other Serbian leaders, such as draining assets or altering banking records.”  A few years later, during the time of the second invasion of Iraq, a similar plan was rolled out to “cripple” the financial system of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, leaving him “no money for war supplies. No money to pay troops.”


Neither plan seems to have been executed. The Treasury Department and senior political officials apparently blocked these attacks, for fear of cascading failures and setting a precedent of targeting banks.


More recently, according to the New York Times, the Obama administration and military commanders considered “a cyberoffensive to disrupt and even disable the Gaddafi government’s air-defense system.” A cyber strike on Libya was apparently ruled out both because there was not enough time and also because officials felt that cyber capabilities are like a “Ferrari” which should be saved for the “big race.” The Israeli Air Force apparently did not think so, as it was widely reported they used a backdoor “kill switch” to disable Syrian air defenses en route to destroying an illicit nuclear reactor.


Given this history, what can and should the United States do today against Syria?


It is unlikely that President Obama will authorize covert cyber operations against Bashar Assad’s finances. Both of his immediate predecessors declined such attacks and the world economy and financial sector are already in a perilous state. A limited cyber attack integrated with traditional military forces should be a far more tempting option. 


Cyber capabilities could first disrupt Syrian air defenses directly or confuse military command and control, allowing air strikes to proceed unchallenged. A cyber strike might also disable dual-use Syrian critical infrastructure (such as electrical power) that aids the regime’s military but with no long-term destruction as would be caused by traditional bombs. Last, it is possible the U.S. military has cyber capabilities to directly disrupt the operations of Syria’s chemical troops. This would need very specific capabilities against hard-to-reach computers; any disruption would be short but such an attack is feasible.


The first constraint which reportedly ruled out cyber attacks against Libyan air defenses, the time needed, should not be a constraint for Syria: the U.S. military has had months if not years to develop the requisite cyber capabilities along with options to deliver them to the optimal targets. 


On the second constraint, this might be the ‘big race’ that U.S. officials have been waiting for, but for political reasons, rather than military. In the past several years, the United States has been caught using Stuxnet to conduct a covert cyber campaign against Iran as well as trawling the Internet with the massive PRISM collection operation. The world is increasingly seeing U.S. cyber power as a force for evil in the world.


A cyber operation against Syria might help to reverse this view. 


Recently, experts from United States, China, Russia and other states reported to the U.N. Secretary General that existing international law, including international humanitarian law (aka, the laws of armed conflict such as the Geneva and Hague conventions) apply to cyber conflict. By sparing the lives of Syrian troops and nearby civilians, an opening cyber operation against Syria could demonstrate exactly how such capabilities can compliant with the international humanitarian law.  European allies would see an operation within the norms of shared transatlantic principles, not at odds with them like Stuxnet or PRISM.   


Unfortunately, it is unlikely cyber capabilities will be used, or at least unlikely the White House and military will discuss them even if they are. The classification around these operations has created a self-sustaining taboo. Even though the U.S. national interest is greatly served by removing the voodoo mystique around them, official silence will allow doubters and the ill-informed to continue to dominate the debate.


Despite my own background in U.S. military offensive and defensive cyber operations, I have long been a skeptic of the use of military cyber power as it has been used off the battlefield in sneaky circumstances. America should take this chance to demystify these weapons to show the world they, and the U.S. military in general, can be used on the battlefield in line with humanitarian principles.



This article was originally published at Defense One.


 






    








Master Feed : The Atlantic



The U.S. Should Use Cyber Weapons Against Assad

Thursday, July 11, 2013

U.S.-China talks cover cyber issues, currency, Chinese reform




U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew (back L) delivers remarks with China


1 of 2. U.S. Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew (back L) delivers remarks with China’s Vice Premier Wang Yang (back R) at the U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue (S&ED) at the Treasury Department in Washington, July 10, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Ernst






WASHINGTON | Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:42pm EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. officials appealed to China’s self-interest on Wednesday with calls for deeper economic reforms including changes to the exchange rate policy and a halt to cyber theft of trade secrets – actions they said would benefit both nations.


Vice President Joe Biden launched the annual U.S.-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue by stressing the shared stakes and responsibility to support the global economy.


“The next steps that China needs to take for its own economy happen to be in the interests of the United States as well,” he said as the two-day talks opened in Washington.


“Your own plans call for the kinds of changes that have to take place, that are difficult, like here, but if they do, they will benefit us both, including free exchange rate, shifting to a consumption-led economy, enforcing intellectual property rights and renewing innovation,” said Biden.


But Biden did not mince words when he raised the hot-button issue of theft of intellectual property through hacking of computer networks, a conversation complicated by the fugitive spy agency contractor Edward Snowden’s revelations of U.S. electronic surveillance around the world.


“Outright cyber-enabling theft that U.S. companies are experiencing now must be viewed as out of bounds and needs to stop,” said Biden. U.S. officials say all countries spy on each other, but China is unique in its theft of foreign technology.


Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns and Treasury Secretary Jack Lew are hosting a Chinese delegation led by State Councilor Yang Jiechi and Vice Premier Wang Yang for annual talks that cover both economics and wider geopolitical issues.


Burns filled in for Secretary of State John Kerry, who left the meetings Wednesday to care for his ailing wife.


The talks were launched in 2008 with aim of managing an increasingly complex U.S.-China relationship and avoiding competition between the world’s two largest economies from turning into destabilizing conflict.


U.S. SEEKS LEVEL PLAYING FIELD


Wang’s remarks to open the forum highlighted China’s desire – voiced by Chinese President Xi Jinping last month in a summit with President Barack Obama – to forge a new relationship.


“Our job in this round … is to turn the important agreements between the two presidents into tangible outcomes, and add substance to this new model of major country relationship,” he said.


Lew welcomed reform plans circulating in China under the new administration of Xi, who took office in March.


However, Lew also aired a list of American complaints about Chinese policies that a watchful U.S. Congress has pressed the Obama administration to tackle.


The United States seeks “an economic relationship where our firms and workers operate on a level playing field and where the rights of those who participate in the global economy – including innovators and the holders of intellectual property – are preserved and protected from government-sponsored cyber intrusion,” said Lew.


China denies being behind the hacking and insists it is a major victim of cyber attacks, including from the United States – an argument that Beijing sees as strengthened by Snowden’s revelations. The two countries held talks focused on cyber issues on Monday and discussed the issue again on Tuesday and Wednesday.


“We were exceptionally clear … that there is a vast distinction between intelligence-gathering activities that all countries do and the theft of intellectual property for the benefit of businesses,” said a senior U.S. official.


“We were very frank with them that you cannot mix apples and oranges in this case,” added a second official.


U.S. businesses also complain about policies that require foreigners to transfer technology to China to gain access to the market, barriers to farm goods, and financial and regulatory favoritism to China’s state-owned companies.


When the meeting split into separate strategic and economic talks, Lew again stressed the importance of reforms – including to the exchange rate – to shift China’s economy from reliance on investment and exports to growth driven by consumption.


“Exchange rate reform is an essential part of this process because it will boost the purchasing power of Chinese households,” he told senior U.S. and Chinese officials.


“The transition will not be easy. But as long as it is delayed, risks in the system continue to build,” added Lew.


In response, Wang said, “I think it will take us at least 5 years to resolve those issues and reach consensus.”


Wang said China had learned much from listening to other views as it modernized its economy since the 1970s. But there were limits to China’s tolerance of criticism, he said.


“Like the United States, we will never accept views, however presented, that undermine our basic system or national interests,” Wang said.


China was expected to air concerns of its own about U.S. policy, including Beijing’s demand that Washington ease Cold War-era controls on high technology exports and clarify the approval process for Chinese acquisitions of American companies.


Across the U.S. capital lawmakers showed their ambivalence about Chinese investment, questioning the head of Smithfield Foods over the proposed sale of the Virginia ham maker to China’s largest pork producer.


(Additional reporting by Lesley Wroughton, Arshad Mohammed, Doug Palmer and Timothy Gardner; Editing by Doina Chiacu)






Reuters: Politics



U.S.-China talks cover cyber issues, currency, Chinese reform

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

NSA chief says U.S. infrastructure highly vulnerable to cyber attack


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. critical infrastructure – which ranges from telecommunications to water to energy supplies – is not well prepared to handle a destructive cyber attack, the top U.S. general in charge of cybersecurity said on Wednesday.


National Security Agency chief General Keith Alexander, making his first public appearance since revelations surfaced last week about U.S. telephone and internet surveillance efforts, made the comments in a statement prepared for testimony before Congress.


“On a scale of one to 10, with 10 being strongly defended, our critical infrastructure‘s preparedness to withstand a destructive cyber attack is about a three based on my experience,” Alexander, also in charge of the U.S. military’s Cyber Command, wrote in the statement prepared for the Senate Appropriations Committee for a hearing on cybersecurity.


Alexander said the United States has been and continues to be a target of cyberattacks by foreign nations.


About 90 percent of the nation’s critical infrastructure is owned by the private sector, and therefore is not under the control of the U.S. government or military.


While he made no mention of the leaks about NSA surveillance programs, Alexander said it was vital to have a strong Defense Department role in cyberspace in light of what he called real and growing threats.


“While we feel confident that most foreign leaders believe that a devastating attack on the critical infrastructure and population of the United States by cyber means would elicit a prompt and proportionate response, it is possible, however, that some regime or cyber actor could misjudge the impact and the certainty of our resolve,” he said.


Alexander told the Reuters Cybersecurity Summit last month that the United States was increasingly vulnerable to attacks like those that destroyed data on tens of thousands of computers in Saudi Arabia and South Korea in the past year.


(Reporting by Deborah Charles)




Congress News Headlines – Yahoo! News



NSA chief says U.S. infrastructure highly vulnerable to cyber attack

NSA chief says U.S. infrastructure highly vulnerable to cyber attack


An aide (L) takes notes as U.S. General Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency (NSA) and U.S. Cyber Command, speaks to reporters during the Reuters Cybersecurity Summit in Washington, May 14, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Stelios Varias




Reuters: Politics



NSA chief says U.S. infrastructure highly vulnerable to cyber attack

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Microsoft and FBI Take Down Global Cyber Crime Ring


What’s This?


Microsoft-fbi-citadel-botnets


Microsoft, working along with the FBI and 80 authorities from across the world, took down the vast majority of computers that were part of a malicious botnet network known as “Citadel.”


The Citadel botnets were one of the biggest cyber crime rings, allegedly responsible for stealing more than $ 500 million from the bank accounts of more than 5 million infected computers over the past 18 months.


The network was made of at least 1,400 botnets, which are an army of infected computers used by hackers to exfiltrate data, attack other computers and commit other types of cybercrimes. According to Reuters, Microsoft took down more than 1,000 of them, while the company later claimed that it had taken down more than 1,400.


“The bad guys will feel the punch in the gut,” Richard Boscovich, a spokesman for Microsoft’s digital crimes unit told Reuters.


The “bad guys” behind Citadel, however, are still unknown. The coordinated takedown, while it didn’t completely shut down the infrastructure, has at least significantly disrupted it. This marked the first time a private company and law enforcement agencies have collaborated to take down a global cyber ring like the Citadel botnets.



Authorities believe the hackers behind Citadel reside in Eastern Europe. In fact, the Citadel malware is designed not to operate in Russia and Ukraine, probably because its operators reside in one of those countries and don’t want to provoke local authorities. Their ring leader allegedly goes by the name of Aquabox and works with at least 81 other conspirators.


The Citadel malware was mainly spread via pirated versions of Microsoft Windows. Once the virus infected a computer, it stole banking credentials and used those to syphon money from some of the World’s largest banking institutions like Bank of America, HSBC, Wells Fargo and other financial companies such as Paypal or American Express.


The botnets were mainly located within the United States, but also in Western Europe, Hong Kong, India and Australia.


Image via iStockphoto, bjdlzx


Topics: botnets, cybercrime, FBI, Microsoft, U.S., US & World, World



Mashable



Microsoft and FBI Take Down Global Cyber Crime Ring