Showing posts with label less. Show all posts
Showing posts with label less. Show all posts

Monday, April 7, 2014

US Burns Through All High-Skill Visas For 2015 In Less Than A Week

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



US Burns Through All High-Skill Visas For 2015 In Less Than A Week

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

9 Of The Top 10 Occupations In America Pay An Average Wage Of Less Than $35,000 A Year

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



9 Of The Top 10 Occupations In America Pay An Average Wage Of Less Than $35,000 A Year

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Unintended Consequences - Creating More Debt by Trying to Make Less

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



var addthis_config = "data_track_clickback":false,"data_track_addressbar":false,"data_track_textcopy":false,"ui_atversion":"300";
var addthis_product = "wpp-3.5.9";



Unintended Consequences - Creating More Debt by Trying to Make Less

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

ROCK and I won"t work, and do it for less!

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


ROCK and I won"t work, and do it for less!

Monday, March 24, 2014

ROCK and I won"t work, and do it for less!

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


ROCK and I won"t work, and do it for less!

Valerie Jarrett: Since Obamacare Passed, "We"ve Had Less Increase In Premiums Than Ever Before"





VALERIE JARRETT: What we’ve seen over the last four years since our healthcare plan was passed is we’ve had less increase in premiums than ever before in the last 50 years. And so, we are beginning to, as we say, reduce those costs and that is a big part of the Affordable Care Act is that we want to emphasize outcomes. Not just how many tests a physician orders, but how can we actually have patients, Americans be healthier. (Source: KCBS-TV)




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Valerie Jarrett: Since Obamacare Passed, "We"ve Had Less Increase In Premiums Than Ever Before"

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

Obamacare Creates Incentive to Work Less - CBO Estimates Obamacare Will Cost 2 Million Full-Time Equivalent Jobs by 2017

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Obamacare Creates Incentive to Work Less - CBO Estimates Obamacare Will Cost 2 Million Full-Time Equivalent Jobs by 2017

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Obamacare Creates Incentive to Work Less; CBO Estimates Obamacare Will Cost 2 Million Full-Time Equivalent Jobs by 2017

Obamacare Creates Incentive to Work Less; CBO Estimates Obamacare Will Cost 2 Million Full-Time Equivalent Jobs by 2017

MarketWatch reports Obamacare plans to exceed $ 1 trillion, create reluctant workers.

The CBO projects that insurance subsidies and related spending will account for increasing chunks of deficit spending, starting at $ 20 billion this year and steadily increasing to $ 159 billion in 2024, for a collective cost of just under $ 1.2 trillion. The cumulative total from the ACA for the next decade could reach $ 1.35 trillion.

In several charts in its report, the CBO calls these “effects on the cumulative federal deficit.” But in footnotes and other portions of the 175-page report, the CBO points out there are other sources of revenue generated under the ACA that are expected to make it deficit neutral.


Labor Market Effects of the Affordable Care Act


Inquiring minds are also in interested in labor force projections. For that let’s dive into the massive 182 page PDF CBO Budget and Economic Outlook 2014 to 2024 report.


Incentive to Work Less


On PDF page 44 (Report page 38) a curious footnote reads “By providing subsidies that decline with rising income (and increase with falling income) and by making some people financially better off, the ACA will create an incentive for some people to work less.


A detailed explanation is found in Appendix C on PDF page 123.

How Much Will the ACA Reduce Employment in the Longer Term?

The ACA’s largest impact on labor markets will probably occur after 2016, once its major provisions have taken full effect and overall economic output nears its maximum sustainable level. CBO estimates that the ACA will reduce the total number of hours worked, on net, by about 1.5 percent to 2.0 percent during the period from 2017 to 2024, almost entirely because workers will choose to supply less labor — given the new taxes and other incentives they will face and the financial benefits some will receive. Because the largest declines in labor supply will probably occur among lower-wage workers, the reduction in aggregate compensation (wages, salaries, and fringe benefits) and the impact on the overall economy will be proportionally smaller than the reduction in hours worked. Specifically, CBO estimates that the ACA will cause a reduction of roughly 1 percent in aggregate labor compensation over the 2017–2024 period, compared with what it would have been otherwise. Although such effects are likely to continue after 2024 (the end of the current 10-year budget window), CBO has not estimated their magnitude or duration over a longer period.


The reduction in CBO’s projections of hours worked represents a decline in the number of full-time-equivalent workers of about 2.0 million in 2017, rising to about 2.5 million in 2024. Although CBO projects that total employment (and compensation) will increase over the coming decade, that increase will be smaller than it would have been in the absence of the ACA. The decline in full-time-equivalent employment stemming from the ACA will consist of some people not being employed at all and other people working fewer hours.


Why Does CBO Estimate Larger Reductions Than It Did in 2010?


In 2010, CBO estimated that the ACA, on net, would reduce the amount of labor used in the economy by roughly half a percent—primarily by reducing the amount of labor that workers choose to supply. 2 That measure of labor use was calculated in dollar terms, representing the approximate change in aggregate labor compensation that would result. Hence, that estimate can be compared with the roughly 1 percent reduction in aggregate compensation that CBO now estimates to result from the act. There are several reasons for that difference: CBO has now incorporated into its analysis additional channels through which the ACA will affect labor supply, reviewed new research about those effects, and revised upward its estimates of the responsiveness of labor supply to changes in tax rates.


Don’t worry. This won’t cost 2 million jobs, only 2 million equivalent full-time jobs.  Perhaps a many as 6 million work fewer hours each week. The CBO did not estimate the breakdown.


Regardless, that cannot possibly happen, can it?  Didn’t Obama claim ACA would create jobs? Hmm. What else did he promise?


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis




Read more about Obamacare Creates Incentive to Work Less; CBO Estimates Obamacare Will Cost 2 Million Full-Time Equivalent Jobs by 2017 and other interesting subjects concerning Economy at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Starving hives: Pesticides cause bees to collect 57% less pollen, study says


Reuters / Leonhard Foeger
Reuters / Leonhard Foeger


​Bees exposed to “field-realistic” doses of insecticides gather less than a half the pollen that they normally do, dooming their young to starvation, UK researches have said. While some scientists hailed the findings, pesticide makers remained unimpressed


In a spin-off of their earlier study, a team of British scientists have revealed how the neurotoxic chemicals contained in agricultural neonicotinoids affect the very basic function of the honeybees – the gathering of pollen, or flower nectar.


“Pollen is the only source of protein that bees have, and it is vital for rearing their young. Collecting it is fiddly, slow work for the bees and intoxicated bees become much worse at it. Without much pollen, nests will inevitably struggle,” explained University of Sussex professor Dave Goulson, who has led the study. His comments were made in a statement released alongside the research.


Goulson’s latest paper called “Field realistic doses of pesticide imidacloprid reduce bumblebee pollen foraging efficiency” was published at the end of January in peer-reviewed journal Ecotoxicology.


The scientists exposed some of the studied bees to low doses of imidacloprid and tracked their movement with the help of electronic tags. Unexposed bees were also tracked, and each insect flying out and returning to a hive was weighed to find out the amount of pollen it gathered.


It turned out that bees exposed to the neonicotinoid brought back pollen from only 40 percent of their trips asopposed to 63 percent of useful trips which their “healthy” counterparts undertook.
Intoxicated bees cut the amount of pollen gathered by nearly a third – overall, the comparative study showed that the hives exposed to the pesticide received 57 percent less pollen.


“Even near-infinitesimal doses of these neurotoxins seem to be enough to mess up the ability of bees to gather food. Given the vital importance of bumblebees as pollinators, this is surely a cause for concern,” Hannah Feltham of the University of Stirling, another member of the research team, stated.


For bees themselves, the cut appeared to represent a sharp decline in the amount of food that the hive’s population received.


Feltham believed the study adds “another piece to the jigsaw” of why the bees have been in sharp decline lately.


Three types of controversial neonicotinoids have been temporarily banned in the European Union after the European Food Safety Authority carried out peer review of several studies showing that widely-used pesticides could harm the bees’ populations.


“It is unclear what will happen when the [EU ban] expires, as the agrochemical companies that produce them are in a legal dispute with the EU over their decision. Our new study adds to the weight of evidence for making the ban permanent,” Goulson said.


But the dispute over the role of pesticides in the so-called Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), or mass extinction of bees, is far from being over, the reaction to the study has shown.


“This is a very important study, because it provides further detail on how bumblebee foraging is made less efficient by exposure to imidacloprid at these levels,” said Lynn Dicks, an ecologist at the University of Cambridge.


However, she then questioned the “field-realistic” dose of chemical used by the UK scientists in their study.


“The [levels in this study], particularly the pollen level, are at the upper end of what is found in the field, and likely to be higher than what bumblebee colonies are actually exposed to, because they don’t feed exclusively on oilseed rape,” Dicks argued.


Pesticide manufacturers appeared to be even more dismissive of the study’s results, comparing it to a practice of force-feeding in laboratory conditions.


“It would appear the bumble bees are essentially force-fed relatively high levels of the pesticide in sugar solutions, rather than allowing them to forage on plants treated with a seed treatment. Real field studies, such as those being initiated this autumn in the UK will give more realistic data on this subject,” Julian Little, a spokesman for major German imidacloprid producer Bayer AG has said.


Whether such open-field tests could provide a more balanced data is another issue the researchers have been arguing over. Some say that properly controlled field trials are difficult to conduct, as neonicotinoids have been widely used and bees range over wide areas to gather pollen.


Source: RT





End the Lie – Independent News



Starving hives: Pesticides cause bees to collect 57% less pollen, study says

Friday, January 17, 2014

Obama speech: Miller Lite commercial: less filling, tastes great


Obama speech: Miller Lite commercial: less filling, tastes great


by Jon Rappoport


January 17, 2014


www.nomorefakenews.com


Obama just made a Miller Lite speech, to calm fears that NSA spying is a bother and a problem. Not so. All is well.


He’ll cut down the NSA practice of spying on people connected to people connected to people of interest. The three layers will become only two.


This is great, except that NSA is already spying on everybody. Three, two, 16? What difference does it make?


For the “tastes great” part, the President reminded us that NSA snoops are just regular folks. They’re our “friends and neighbors,” he said.


I know. That’s the point. There are cold-eyed androids among us.


For the “less filling,” Obama proposed that the all-encompassing metadata of NSA-captured phone calls shouldn’t be held by the government. That’s bad. Instead, the phone companies themselves should hold it, and then let the government look at it.


Whew. What a relief.


We all know NSA will do whatever it wants to, in order to keep spying on us. Trim their capability a little over here, they’ll go over there and do the same thing from another vector.


That’s what the Surveillance State is all about.


Obama also jammed in a sideswipe at Snowden, just to keep the traitor narrative alive. And to let us know stealing State secrets is a heinous crime.


You see, the State can steal our information, but we can’t steal its information. That’s the basic principle.


But to quote our leader from an earlier speech(es), “We’re all in this together.”


I guess it depends on what the meaning of “together” is.


NSA won’t bother parsing that. They’ll just keep on watching and compiling and collating. Being Peeping Tom Central is in their blood. “To keep us safe.”


As the pollsters go to the phones and gauge public reaction to Obama’s speech, I have a suggestion. Ask, “Do you believe the President was being forthright and honest?” And then ask, “Okay now, do you REALLY believe he was being forthright and honest?”


And if NSA wants to repair its public image, I have more suggestions. Since you boys are spying on everybody all the time, release the following information to the press:


Conversations involving politicians, at all levels, on the subject of hookers and underage sex targets;


Elite pedophile rings;


Communications (military, intelligence, DOJ, State Dept., White House) re what really happened in Benghazi, what really happened in the Fast&Furious Op;


Brokerage house/banker/billionaire manipulation of the stock market;


Behind the scenes lies among the high-echelon execs at Monsanto.


Just for starters.


Obviously, you have all this info. Release it now. Prove you’re on our side.


What? All those people aren’t your targets?


We are?


Oh.


Gotta go. My refrigerator just told me the toaster said I put hemp butter on my toast this morning. It’s an indicator I could have two tons of pot in my garage.


Jon Rappoport


The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com




.



Jon Rappoport’s Blog



Obama speech: Miller Lite commercial: less filling, tastes great

Monday, January 13, 2014

GOP Just Made Obamacare More Costly, Less Effective


Remember, kids, self-reporting is a trustworthy thing when it comes to the pharmaceutical, food processing, and fertilizer industries — but not for your Oba…



GOP Just Made Obamacare More Costly, Less Effective

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

How Will The Economy Improve In 2014 If Almost Everyone Has Less Money To Spend?

Piggybank-Photo-by-Damian-OSullivan-300x199Is the U.S. consumer tapped out?  If so, how in the world will the U.S. economy possibly improve in 2014?  Most Americans know that the U.S. economy is heavily dependent on consumer spending.  If average Americans are not out there spending money, the economy tends not to do very well.  Unfortunately, retail sales during the holiday season appear to be quite disappointing and the middle class continues to deeply struggle.  And for a whole bunch of reasons things are likely going to be even tougher in 2014.  Families are going to have less money in their pockets to spend thanks to much higher health insurance premiums under Obamacare, a wide variety of tax increases, higher interest rates on debt, and cuts in government welfare programs.  The short-lived bubble of false prosperity that we have been enjoying for the last couple of years is rapidly coming to an end, and 2014 certainly promises to be a very “interesting year”.


Obamacare Rate Shock


Most middle class families are just scraping by from month to month these days.


Unfortunately for them, millions of those families are now being hit with massive health insurance rate increases.


In a previous article, I discussed how one study found that health insurance premiums for men are going to go up by an average of 99 percent under Obamacare and health insurance premiums for women are going to go up by an average of 62 percent under Obamacare.


Most middle class families simply cannot afford that.


Earlier today, I got an email from a reader that was paying $ 478 a month for health insurance for his family but has now received a letter informing him that his rate is going up to $ 1,150 a month.


Millions of families are receiving letters just like that.  And to say that these rate increases are a “surprise” to most people would be a massive understatement.  Even people that work in the financial industry are shocked at how high these premiums are turning out to be…


“The real big surprise was how much out-of-pocket would be required for our family,” said David Winebrenner, 46, a financial adviser in Lebanon, Ky., whose deductible topped $ 12,000 for a family of six for a silver plan he was considering. The monthly premium: $ 1,400.



Since Americans are going to have to pay much more for health insurance, that is going to remove a huge amount of discretionary spending from the economy, and that will not be good news for retailers.


Get Ready For Higher Taxes


When you raise taxes, you reduce the amount of money that people have in their pockets to spend.


Sadly, that is exactly what is happening.


Congress is allowing a whopping 55 tax breaks to expire at the end of this year, and when you add that to the 13 major tax increases that hit American families in 2013, it isn’t a pretty picture.


This tax season, millions of families are going to find out that they have much higher tax bills than they had anticipated.


And all of this comes at a time when incomes in America have beensteadily declining.  In fact, real median household income has declined by a total of 8 percent since 2008.


If you are a worker, you might want to check out the chart that I have posted below to see where you stack up.  In America today, most workers are low income workers.  These numbers come from a recentHuffington Post article


-If you make more than $ 10,000, you earn more than 24.2% of Americans, or 37 million people.


-If you make more than $ 15,000 (roughly the annual salary of a minimum-wage employee working 40 hours per week), you earn more than 32.2% of Americans.


-If you make more than $ 30,000, you earn more than 53.2% of Americans.


-If you make more than $ 50,000, you earn more than 73.4% of Americans.


-If you make more than $ 100,000, you earn more than 92.6% of Americans.


-You are officially in the top 1% of American wage earners if you earn more than $ 250,000.


-The 894 people that earn more than $ 20 millionmake more than 99.99989% of Americans, and are compensated a cumulative $ 37,009,979,568 per year.



It is important to keep in mind that those numbers are for the employment income of individuals not households.  Most households have more than one member working, so overall household incomes are significantly higher than these numbers.


Higher Interest Rates Mean Larger Debt Payments


On Tuesday, the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasuries rose to 3.03 percent.  I warned that this would happen once the taper started, and this is just the beginning.  Interest rates are likely to steadily rise throughout 2014.


The reason why the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasuries is such a critical number is because mortgage rates and thousands of other interest rates throughout our economy are heavily influenced by that number.


So big changes are on the way.  As a recent CNBC article declared, the era of low mortgage rates is officially over…


The days of the 3.5% 30-year fixed are over. Rates are already up well over a full percentage point from a year ago, and as the Federal Reserve begins its much anticipated exit from the bond-buying business, I believe rates will inevitably go higher.



Needless to say, this is going to deeply affect the real estate market.  AsMac Slavo recently noted, numbers are already starting to drop precipitously…


The National Association of Realtors reported that the month of September saw its single largest drop in signed home sales in 40 months. And that wasn’t just a one-off event. This month mortgage applications collapsed a shocking 66%, hitting a13-year low.



And U.S. consumers can expect interest rates on all kinds of loans to start rising.  That is going to mean higher debt payments, and therefore less money for consumers to spend into the economy.


Government Benefit Cuts


Well, if the middle class is going to have less money to spend, perhaps other Americans can pick up the slack.


Or maybe not.


You certainly can’t expect the poor to stimulate the economy.  As I mentioned yesterday, it is being projected that up to 5 million unemployed Americans could lose their unemployment benefits by the end of 2014, and 47 million Americans recently had their food stamp benefits reduced.


So the poor will also have less money to spend in 2014.


The Wealthy Save The Day?


Perhaps the stock market will continue to soar in 2014 and the wealthy will spend so much that it will make up for all the rest of us.


You can believe that if you want, but the truth is that there are a whole host of signs that the days of this irrational stock market bubble are numbered.  The following is an excerpt from one of my recent articles entitled “The Stock Market Has Officially Entered Crazytown Territory“…


The median price-to-earnings ratio on the S&P 500 has reached an all-time record high, and margin debt at the New York Stock Exchange has reached a level that we have never seen before.  In other words, stocks are massively overpriced and people have been borrowing huge amounts of money to buy stocks.  These are behaviors that we also saw just before the last two stock market bubbles burst.



If the stock market bubble does burst, the wealthy will also have less money to spend into the economy in 2014.


For the moment, the stock market has been rallying.  This is typical for the month of December.  You see, the truth is that investors generally don’t want to sell stocks in December because they want to put off paying taxes on the profits.


If stocks are sold before the end of the year, the profits go on the 2013 tax return.


If stocks are sold a few days from now, the profits go on the 2014 tax return.


It is only human nature to want to delay pain for as long as possible.


Expect to see some selling in January.  Many investors are very eager to start taking profits, but they wanted to wait until the holidays were over to do so.


So what do you think is coming up in 2014?  Please feel free to share what you think by posting a comment below…


Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the University of Florida law school and he worked as an attorney in the heart of Washington D.C. for a number of years. Today, Michael is best known for his work as the publisher of The Economic Collapse Blog and The American Dream. If you want to know what things in America are going to look like in a few years read his new book The Beginning of the End.



SHTF Plan – When It Hits The Fan, Don’t Say We Didn’t Warn You



How Will The Economy Improve In 2014 If Almost Everyone Has Less Money To Spend?

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

How Will The Economy Improve In 2014 If Almost Everyone Has Less Money To Spend?


Piggybank - Photo by Damian OIs the U.S. consumer tapped out?  If so, how in the world will the U.S. economy possibly improve in 2014?  Most Americans know that the U.S. economy is heavily dependent on consumer spending.  If average Americans are not out there spending money, the economy tends not to do very well.  Unfortunately, retail sales during the holiday season appear to be quite disappointing and the middle class continues to deeply struggle.  And for a whole bunch of reasons things are likely going to be even tougher in 2014.  Families are going to have less money in their pockets to spend thanks to much higher health insurance premiums under Obamacare, a wide variety of tax increases, higher interest rates on debt, and cuts in government welfare programs.  The short-lived bubble of false prosperity that we have been enjoying for the last couple of years is rapidly coming to an end, and 2014 certainly promises to be a very “interesting year”.


Obamacare Rate Shock


Most middle class families are just scraping by from month to month these days.


Unfortunately for them, millions of those families are now being hit with massive health insurance rate increases.


In a previous article, I discussed how one study found that health insurance premiums for men are going to go up by an average of 99 percent under Obamacare and health insurance premiums for women are going to go up by an average of 62 percent under Obamacare.


Most middle class families simply cannot afford that.


Earlier today, I got an email from a reader that was paying $ 478 a month for health insurance for his family but has now received a letter informing him that his rate is going up to $ 1,150 a month.


Millions of families are receiving letters just like that.  And to say that these rate increases are a “surprise” to most people would be a massive understatement.  Even people that work in the financial industry are shocked at how high these premiums are turning out to be…


“The real big surprise was how much out-of-pocket would be required for our family,” said David Winebrenner, 46, a financial adviser in Lebanon, Ky., whose deductible topped $ 12,000 for a family of six for a silver plan he was considering. The monthly premium: $ 1,400.



Since Americans are going to have to pay much more for health insurance, that is going to remove a huge amount of discretionary spending from the economy, and that will not be good news for retailers.


Get Ready For Higher Taxes


When you raise taxes, you reduce the amount of money that people have in their pockets to spend.


Sadly, that is exactly what is happening.


Congress is allowing a whopping 55 tax breaks to expire at the end of this year, and when you add that to the 13 major tax increases that hit American families in 2013, it isn’t a pretty picture.


This tax season, millions of families are going to find out that they have much higher tax bills than they had anticipated.


And all of this comes at a time when incomes in America have been steadily declining.  In fact, real median household income has declined by a total of 8 percent since 2008.


If you are a worker, you might want to check out the chart that I have posted below to see where you stack up.  In America today, most workers are low income workers.  These numbers come from a recent Huffington Post article


-If you make more than $ 10,000, you earn more than 24.2% of Americans, or 37 million people.


-If you make more than $ 15,000 (roughly the annual salary of a minimum-wage employee working 40 hours per week), you earn more than 32.2% of Americans.


-If you make more than $ 30,000, you earn more than 53.2% of Americans.


-If you make more than $ 50,000, you earn more than 73.4% of Americans.


-If you make more than $ 100,000, you earn more than 92.6% of Americans.


-You are officially in the top 1% of American wage earners if you earn more than $ 250,000.


-The 894 people that earn more than $ 20 million make more than 99.99989% of Americans, and are compensated a cumulative $ 37,009,979,568 per year.



It is important to keep in mind that those numbers are for the employment income of individuals not households.  Most households have more than one member working, so overall household incomes are significantly higher than these numbers.


Higher Interest Rates Mean Larger Debt Payments


On Tuesday, the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasuries rose to 3.03 percent.  I warned that this would happen once the taper started, and this is just the beginning.  Interest rates are likely to steadily rise throughout 2014.


The reason why the yield on 10 year U.S. Treasuries is such a critical number is because mortgage rates and thousands of other interest rates throughout our economy are heavily influenced by that number.


So big changes are on the way.  As a recent CNBC article declared, the era of low mortgage rates is officially over…


The days of the 3.5% 30-year fixed are over. Rates are already up well over a full percentage point from a year ago, and as the Federal Reserve begins its much anticipated exit from the bond-buying business, I believe rates will inevitably go higher.



Needless to say, this is going to deeply affect the real estate market.  As Mac Slavo recently noted, numbers are already starting to drop precipitously…


The National Association of Realtors reported that the month of September saw its single largest drop in signed home sales in 40 months. And that wasn’t just a one-off event. This month mortgage applications collapsed a shocking 66%, hitting a 13-year low.



And U.S. consumers can expect interest rates on all kinds of loans to start rising.  That is going to mean higher debt payments, and therefore less money for consumers to spend into the economy.


Government Benefit Cuts


Well, if the middle class is going to have less money to spend, perhaps other Americans can pick up the slack.


Or maybe not.


You certainly can’t expect the poor to stimulate the economy.  As I mentioned yesterday, it is being projected that up to 5 million unemployed Americans could lose their unemployment benefits by the end of 2014, and 47 million Americans recently had their food stamp benefits reduced.


So the poor will also have less money to spend in 2014.


The Wealthy Save The Day?


Perhaps the stock market will continue to soar in 2014 and the wealthy will spend so much that it will make up for all the rest of us.


You can believe that if you want, but the truth is that there are a whole host of signs that the days of this irrational stock market bubble are numbered.  The following is an excerpt from one of my recent articles entitled “The Stock Market Has Officially Entered Crazytown Territory“…


The median price-to-earnings ratio on the S&P 500 has reached an all-time record high, and margin debt at the New York Stock Exchange has reached a level that we have never seen before.  In other words, stocks are massively overpriced and people have been borrowing huge amounts of money to buy stocks.  These are behaviors that we also saw just before the last two stock market bubbles burst.



If the stock market bubble does burst, the wealthy will also have less money to spend into the economy in 2014.


For the moment, the stock market has been rallying.  This is typical for the month of December.  You see, the truth is that investors generally don’t want to sell stocks in December because they want to put off paying taxes on the profits.


If stocks are sold before the end of the year, the profits go on the 2013 tax return.


If stocks are sold a few days from now, the profits go on the 2014 tax return.


It is only human nature to want to delay pain for as long as possible.


Expect to see some selling in January.  Many investors are very eager to start taking profits, but they wanted to wait until the holidays were over to do so.


So what do you think is coming up in 2014?  Please feel free to share what you think by posting a comment below…


Piggybank - Photo by Damian O



Be Sociable, Share!

















The Economic Collapse



How Will The Economy Improve In 2014 If Almost Everyone Has Less Money To Spend?

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Do Politicians Work Less if Paid More?

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Do Politicians Work Less if Paid More?

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Kids Are Less Fit Today Than You Were Back Then





There’s a reason she’s out there all alone. Children worldwide are spending less time on sports and active play and more time with TVs and video games.



iStockphoto.com


Children around the world are less aerobically fit than their parents were as kids, a decline that researchers say could be setting them up for serious health problems once they’re grown up.


Children today take 90 seconds longer to run a mile than kids did 30 years ago, according to data from 28 countries. Children’s aerobic fitness has declined by 5 percent since 1975.


Researchers at the University of South Australia used running speed as a simple proxy for aerobic fitness, because it measures cardiovascular health and endurance. Aerobically fit adults are much less likely to have heart attacks and strokes, and children who are aerobically fit are more likely to be fit as adults.



The researchers analyzed 50 studies that included 25 million children ages 9 to 17, in the United States, Europe, Australia, New Zealand and Asia.


Children’s speed started dropping in the 1970s, and kids have continued to become more snail-like ever since.


The only scintilla of light in the gloomy data is that starting in the 2000s the decline in fitness seems to be less pronounced, at least in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and perhaps the U.S. Fitness is still plummeting in China. The only country that hasn’t seen a big decline is Japan, where children’s aerobic fitness started out lower but hasn’t slipped much.


Children around the world share the same reasons for being slower, the researchers say.


Increased weight explains 30 to 70 percent of the declines in children’s aerobic fitness, according to Grant Tomkinson, an exercise physiologist who led the study. He reported the results Tuesday at the American Heart Association’s scientific meeting in Dallas.



Higher body mass index “may contribute to the decrease in the running performance of late-teenage girls observed recently,” Japanese scientists wrote in 1998, in one of the studies used.


Lower levels of physical activity, both in organized sports and at play, account for a lot of the rest, they say. U.S. health authorities say children should be getting 60 minutes of active play a day, but only one-third are getting that.


Children are much less likely to walk, bike or skate to school than they were in the 1970s, at least in the U.S., Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom. Neighborhoods are increasingly suburban, especially in Asia, and people are driving more.


And from the 1970s till now, the number of global households with TVs, VCRs, computers, Internet access and video games has soared.


There’s a lesson for parents in this, too, and not just that they need to push the kids off the couch. Adult’s aerobic fitness has been falling at pretty much the same rate as children’s, the researchers found.


And for grown-ups, being aerobically fit is probably the best way to reduce the risk of heart disease and stroke.




News



Kids Are Less Fit Today Than You Were Back Then

Sunday, September 15, 2013

Obama: "Less concerned about style points"

Barack Obama is pictured. | AP Photo

‘I’m much more concerned about getting the policy right,’ Obama said in the interview. | AP Photo





President Barack Obama pushed back Sunday on the notion that his administration had bungled the response to the Syrian crisis.


In an interview that aired one day after the his administration hammered out a draft agreement with Russia over Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles, Obama told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that he was more worried about the substance of that agreement than the political optics.



“I’m less concerned about style points, I’m much more concerned about getting the policy right,” Obama said in an interview that aired on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday morning. “What I’ve said consistently throughout is that — the chemical weapons issue is a problem. I want that problem dealt with. Obama — who initially called for punitive military action against against Syria before a workable diplomatic plan emerged last week — said that a bad policy could have a smooth rollout and vice versa.


(PHOTOS: What lawmakers said then (Iraq) and now (Syria))


“Folks here in Washington like to grade on style,” Obama said. “Had we rolled out something that was very smooth and disciplined and linear they would have graded it well, even if it was a disastrous policy.”


“We know that, ‘cause that’s exactly how they graded the Iraq War until it ended up blowing in our face,” Obama said.


Obama also warned Iran — whose alleged nuclear program has been an ongoing issue for the international community — that they should not draw any lessons from the Syrian regime’s ability to avoid a military strike.


(PHOTOS: Syria: Where politicians stand)


“My suspicion is that the Iranians recognize they they shouldn’t draw a lesson that we haven’t struck to think we won’t strike Iran. On the other hand, what is — what— they should draw from this lesson is that there is the potential of resolving these issues diplomatically,” Obama said.


“Iranians understand is that the nuclear issue is a far larger issue for us than the chemical weapons issue,” Obama said. The threat against Iran — against Israel — that a nuclear Iran poses, is much closer to our core interests. That a nuclear arms race in the region— is something that would be profoundly destabilizing.”


Republicans — even those supportive of the strikes — have accused the Obama administration of an unsteady diplomatic and military response to the rapidly unfolding situation in the Middle East. On Sunday, the GOP criticism of the tentative deal called the deal a coup for the Russians — and their outspoken president, Vladimir Putin.


“I’m skeptical,” said House Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Rogers said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “This is a Russian plan for Russian interests. And we should be very, very concerned.”


(PHOTOS: International response to Syria)


Rogers (R-Mich.) said that the Russians capitalized on Obama’s “indeciveness” with regards to his policies in Syria.


“You have Putin playing chess and Obama playing, frankly, a very lucky game of tic-tack-toe,” former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said on CNN’s “State of the Union. “Putin stepped in to maximize Russian influence in the Middle East.”


He added: “We are now relying on the Russians. We’re now following from behind — not leading from behind. This is not a good long-term position.”


(PHOTOS: Scenes from Syria)


Obama also fired back at a New York Times op-ed written by Putin that accused the United States of failure to act through the international community and cast doubt on the idea that Syrian President Bashar Assad used chemical weapons.




POLITICO – TOP Stories



Obama: "Less concerned about style points"

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Low pay UK: 5 million Britons earn less than living wage



Published time: September 04, 2013 12:39

Workers pack bricks at the Wienerberger Brick Factory in Dosthill, central England August 8, 2013. (Reuters/Darren Staples)

Workers pack bricks at the Wienerberger Brick Factory in Dosthill, central England August 8, 2013. (Reuters/Darren Staples)




A further 1.4 million UK workers are now earning less than a living wage compared to 2009, new research shows. The Labour Party says that many of the new jobs created in recent years are in low paid sectors.


Twenty percent of the working population, or 4.8 million Britons, are now earning below the so-called living wage, up from 3.4 million in 2009, according to the think tank the Resolution Foundation.


At present the living wage is set at 7 pounds 45 pence per hour outside London and 8 pounds 55 in the capital; although in the period covered by the report (April 2012) the living wage was calculated at 7 pounds 20 outside London and 8 pounds 30 in it.


British employers are legally obliged to pay the minimum wage set at 6 pounds 19 pence, but there is no obligation for them to pay the living wage.


The think tank found that 2.9 million women, 25 percent, and 1.9 million men, 15 percent, were paid beneath the living wage in 2012. Seventy-seven percent of employees under 20 and two thirds of people working in the hospitality industry were not paid a living wage.


There were also significant disparities between the regions, with 16 percent of workers in London and the southeast paid below the living wage, compared to 20 percent in other areas of Britain and 23 percent in Wales.


A worker boxes goods at the new Marks & Spencer e-commerce distribution centre in Castle Donington, central England May 8, 2013. (Reuters/Darren Staples)


The report also identified that those receiving the living wage or above, but who are still deemed ‘low paid’, had remained stable at 5.1 million employees. ‘Workers on low pay ‘is an internationally-recognized measure, which is defined as those earning below two thirds of the median hourly rate (11 pounds 15 in the period covered by the report).


“Britain has a sorry story to tell on low pay. Only a handful of our close competitors do worse and the large majority has much lower rates of low pay – sometimes half as much,” said the author of the report economist Matthew Whittaker. “For most of the working population real wages have been flat or declining for many years and as a result more and more people have dipped below the level of the living wage.”


Labour believes that too many people are poorly paid in Britain. Shadow treasury minister Rachel Reeves said that research by the House of Commons library suggested that as much as 60 percent of the jobs created since May 2010 have been in low pay sectors.


She said in a statement Tuesday that government ministers were presiding over “an economy that, for too many people, seems only to offer work that is insecure, poorly paid and – in the worst cases – simply exploitative.”


A sales assistant works on a display of lawnmowers at a Homebase store in Aylesford, south east England May 1, 2013. (Reuters/Luke MacGregor)


Labour will lead a debate on the economy after prime minister’s questions on Wednesday, where it will argue that the government has failed hard working families. 


They have also asked the deputy chairman of international auditors KPMG, Alan Buckle, to consider how a future government can introduce “living wage zones” to make sure more of their staff earns a living wage.


But the coalition government says it has done more to raise the quality of life of the low paid than its predecessor. It has raised the minimum income at which people pay income tax to 10,000 pounds per annum and is considering giving tax breaks to companies paying more to employees than the national minimum of 6 pounds 19 an hour.


“We encourage employers to pay above the national minimum wage when they are profitable and when it’s not at the expense of jobs, which is what the Low Pay Commission takes into consideration when it sets the national minimum wage. Despite being in tough times, this government is doing absolutely everything it can to help people on low pay with the cost of living,” said a government spokesmen responding to the findings.




RT – News



Low pay UK: 5 million Britons earn less than living wage