Showing posts with label night. Show all posts
Showing posts with label night. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Just a Normal Night In

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Just a Normal Night In

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Boehner: We Had A Big Win Last Night

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Boehner: We Had A Big Win Last Night

Monday, February 24, 2014

Taliban kill 21 Afghan soldiers in night raid on Pakistan border


Emma Graham-Harrison
The Guardian
February 24, 2014


The Taliban killed 21 Afghan soldiers on Sunday at a remote outpost near the border with Pakistan, and took at least five others prisoner, in a show of military strength just weeks before a critical election.


The night raid was one of the deadliest single attacks in recent years on the Afghan military, who are stronger and more disciplined than the police and less often targeted directly by insurgents.


President Hamid Karzai cancelled a planned trip to Sri Lanka to deal with the fallout from the deaths, and in a swipe at his neighbour condemned Islamabad for tolerating havens for the insurgents just inside its border.


Read more


This article was posted: Monday, February 24, 2014 at 1:32 pm










Infowars



Taliban kill 21 Afghan soldiers in night raid on Pakistan border

Obama Seizes Control of Late Night TV


Establishment moves into securing entertainment industry as primary conduit for political agenda


Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
February 24, 2014


The recent replacement of Jay Leno with Obama cheerleader Jimmy Fallon is part of a White House coup d’état to take control of late night television.


With more and more young Americans deserting news networks and getting their information and opinions from late night comedy/discussion shows, the establishment is moving into using the entertainment industry as its primary conduit for state propaganda.


Distrust in the institution of television news is hovering at all time lows, which is why one of the few places left that the White House can elicit a sympathetic response to its agenda and talking points is the cosy, make believe world of late night TV.


While Barack Obama is pursuing a chillingly dictatorial political agenda based around executive tyranny, Jimmy Fallon is helping to massage Obama’s image as a down to earth, fun loving guy that you can trust.


While Jay Leno savaged Obamacare in his final weeks as host, one of Fallon’s first acts was to afford Michelle Obama the platform of The Tonight Show to push Obamacare talking points. Fallon even once gushed that President Obama “booked himself”.


While the media has pondered on the mystery of Leno being replaced (he enjoyed consistently high ratings for 20 years), the reality is strikingly obvious.


As Politico and others have reported, this is part of the changing politics of late night TV, with the Obama White House now moving to seize control of late night TV, with Fallon acting as little more than a White House spokesman whenever the need arises.


Watch the video above and read the articles below for more background.


Jimmy Fallon, Democrat Political Asset


The changed politics of late-night TV


Was Jay Leno Canned by NBC For Criticizing Obama?


Johnny Carson’s Head Writer Hints Leno Was Ditched Over Obama Jokes


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


This article was posted: Monday, February 24, 2014 at 10:53 am


Tags: entertainment, mainstream media










Infowars



Obama Seizes Control of Late Night TV

Thursday, February 6, 2014

Open thread for night owls: Pushing back on the absurdities of U.S. presidential campaigns


The editors of The Nation announce Project 45:



American presidential election campaigns are absurd. Absurdly expensive. Absurdly long. Absurdly structured. And absurdly narrow in the range of ideas and options offered to a nation with an absurdly low level of voter participation. If ever there was a time to rethink how this country chooses its chief executive, this is it. And we don’t mean that in some rhetorical sense. We mean that this is the time, right now—two years before the first caucuses and primaries, thirty-three months before the November 2016 election names the forty-fifth president—to get serious about the process. That’s why The Nation is launching what we call “Project 45,” an initiative that refuses to accept the assumption that the 2016 campaign has to be dictated by insiders. We will identify and promote the reforms (and reformers) that offer the promise of a more open, inclusive and democratic process.

Why worry about 2016 now, when there are so many other pressing issues? Because the power brokers who profit from our system’s many imperfections are busy locking down the next election.


The Republican National Committee voted in January to compress and control the schedule of caucuses and primaries that will choose the party’s 2016 nominee; this is one part of a broad strategy to limit debate and undermine the ability of grassroots candidates to build momentum. The party also hopes to move its convention from late summer to as early as June. RNC chair Reince Priebus says he’s implementing “reforms to put Republican voters, not the liberal media, in the driver’s seat,” but that’s just the party line for public consumption. The GOP establishment’s real goal is to strengthen the hand of big money, and to make it easier for an acceptable candidate to prevail in the primaries, secure the nomination and maximize post-convention fundraising. And don’t think Democratic Party insiders won’t feel pressure to mirror that top-down strategy, especially if they sense that their nominating process might evolve into anything other than what former Montana governor—and potential candidate—Brian Schweitzer warns could be a “coronation” of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. In its January 27 cover story, Time asked, “Can Anyone Stop Hillary?” The magazine’s conclusion was that “her unseen candidacy dominates the political galaxy.”


So it’s settled, right? Let’s hope not. First of all, Clinton has yet to toss her smartphone into the ring. Those who “know” that she will might want to check with former President Mario Cuomo. Besides, even the most ardent “Ready for Hillary” campaigners should recognize that her party, her country and even her candidacy are ill served if she has no real competition. If 2016 is the year Republican bosses will control and amplify their party’s message as never before, and Democrats prepare for a Clinton coronation, then fresh ideas will be marginalized. That increases the likelihood that the campaign will be a money-drenched exercise in broadcast and digital character assassination that discourages participation and frustrates change. Faced with this prospect, progressives must focus on 2016 now in order to expand the debate and make real the promise of democracy. […]


To be clear: this is not a “stop Hillary” exercise. We recognize the former secretary of state’s strengths, along with her appeal to millions of Americans who know it is time for a woman president, including many individuals and groups at the base of the Democratic Party. We understand that keeping the presidency out of right-wing Republican hands has value—especially when the forty-fifth president’s appointments could address the many crises created by the pro-corporate activism of the Supreme Court’s current majority. These understandings cannot, however, become an excuse to close off debate and limit options. So we will engage with and examine potential contenders like Schweitzer and Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, prospects like Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren, and any others who might emerge. Through it all, we will encourage primary competition that brings new ideas and new approaches into the process.


Once the nominees are chosen, we will pay attention to serious independent and third-party candidates, who in the best tradition of Progressive Bob La Follette, Socialist Norman Thomas and Ralph Nader, present radical ideas that will eventually be viewed as common sense. We’ll draw attention to ballot access and debate access fights, recognizing that voters deserve a broad discourse, and that front-runners become better contenders—and better presidents—when they’re forced to expand their frame of reference. […]





Blast from the Past. At Daily Kos on this date in 2010—Operation Rescue Offers $ 10,000 Bounty for Doctors:



We saw how this strategy played out in Kansas, with tragic consequences. Operation Rescue collects “evidence” of wrongdoing by abortion providers. It then lobbies law enforcement to investigate the “evidence.” In the case of Dr. Tiller, the organization found its ally in Phill Kline, now under investigation for ethics violations, who spent years investigating and intimidating Dr. Tiller and his clinic. Dr. Tiller was tried and acquitted of all charges, but that didn’t stop Operation Rescue from continuing to claim that Dr. Tiller had performed illegal abortions.

When the law fails to hold abortion providers accountable for performing a legal medical procedure, Operation Rescue supplies information to an extremist who appears willing to take the law into his own hands, as Scott Roeder did.
In his murder trial, Dr. Tiller’s assassin, Scott Roeder, claimed that his decision to murder Dr. Tiller was, in part, a result of the unsuccessful prosecution of Dr. Tiller.





Tweet of the Day:


In new image from Mars Curiosity, Earth is an evening star http://t.co/… http://t.co/…
— @pourmecoffee







On today’s Kagro in the Morning show, Greg Dworkin rounds up Sochi news, CBO fallout (including the Jonathans Corner on the subject), and the future of quant vs. gut journalism. Armando brings a roll of pennies to add 2 cents at a time for further CVS & CBO discussion. Another mention of Sochi’s hacking problems then brings us to a trademarked (not really) KITM storyline merging exercise: Organized Crime, Legitimate Business, or Rival Political Party? You Make the Call.





High Impact Posts. Top Comments.




Daily Kos



Open thread for night owls: Pushing back on the absurdities of U.S. presidential campaigns

Sunday, November 17, 2013

‘Saturday Night Live’ mocks Toronto Mayor Rob Ford for endless stream of apologies


Toronto Mayor Rob Ford on Saturday Night Live SNLIt’s been a rough week for Toronto Mayor Rob Ford. But don’t worry, he had a press conference to apologize for his actions — and then another press conference to apologize for his first press conference.


The scandal-ridden politician was the focus of the cold open during this week’s Saturday Night Live. The fake Ford, played by Bobby Moynihan, appeared on a Canadian broadcast news program. The host asked the Mayor what he wanted to say to his voters.


“Ooh, just that I goofed up, eh?” the Mayor explained.


Faux Ford wasn’t too worried about his public image though. The Mayor pointed out that he had held a press conference earlier in the day to apologize for using crude language earlier in the week. But during his appearance before reporters, fake Ford also brought chapstick for them to put on before kissing his a**.


But the Mayor realized his mistake and apologized at anotherpress conference shortly thereafter. That presser didn’t go well either, however, as Ford’s crack dealer showed up to make a deal.


And then just a half hour before his appearance on the news, program, fake Ford has held another press conference — during which he body slammed the podium after telling reporters to more lewd things.


After realizing that the Canadian broadcast anchor didn’t believe him, faux Ford resorted to appearing on a show where people would believe him — CBS‘ 60 Minutes, which recently came under fire for airing an interview with a ‘Benghazi witness’ who told lies about the attack.


Watch the cold open below:




Red Alert Politics



‘Saturday Night Live’ mocks Toronto Mayor Rob Ford for endless stream of apologies

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Election night 2013 is shaping up to be a historically boring affair | Harry J Enten

Election night 2013 is shaping up to be a historically boring affair | Harry J Enten
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/bb092__80487?ns=guardian&pageName=Article3Aelection-night-2013-outcome-boring3A1988780&ch=Comment+is+free&c3=GU.co.uk&c4=US+politics2CVirginia+28News292CNew+York+28News292CNew+Jersey2CChris+Christie2CBill+de+Blasio2CMayoral+elections+elected+mayors2CUS+news2CWorld+news&c5=Unclassified2CNot+commercially+useful2CUS+Elections&c6=Harry+J+Enten&c7=20132F102F31+033A45&c8=1988780&c9=Blog&c10=Comment&c13=Harry+Enten3A+On+polling+and+politics&c19=GUK&c25=Comment+is+free&c47=UK&c64=US&c65=Election+night+2013+is+shaping+up+to+be+a+historically+boring+affair&c66=Comment+is+free&c67=nextgen-compatible&c72=&c73=&c74=&c75=&h2=GU2FComment+is+free2FComment+is+free2FUS+politics


All three major races in New Jersey, New York, and Virginia are set to be blowouts. It’s something we haven’t seen in 40 years


In case you couldn’t tell, I love elections. But unlike many folks, my favorite year in the four-year cycle of United States elections is not the presidential one. I enjoy getting to know the candidates in state and local contests in a way that only midterm and off-year elections allow. The problem is that there isn’t a “major” competitive race in 2013. This year, we may have a new election night record for earliest announcement of the winners in an off-year following a presidential election.


What do I mean by all of this?


The year after the presidential election features three marquee races: New Jersey governor, New York City mayor, and Virginia governor. New Jersey usually includes outsized personalities in two major media markets (Philadelphia and New York). New York City mayor is basically the same thing, but in the country’s largest city. Virginia is a swing state that is often predictive of the next year’s midterm elections and is next to the nation’s capital.


None of that has necessarily changed this year. New Jersey’s Chris Christie continues to amaze with his uncommonly wide coalition for a Republican. Bill de Blasio’s going to return Democrats to Gracie Mansion in New York City for the first time in 20 years. And you’ll rarely see two major state-wide candidates as disliked as Democrat Terry McAuliffe and Republican Ken Cuccinelli in Virginia.


The difficulty for the electorally excited is that all the probable winners are going to do so rather easily. Christie is up by nearly 30pt, De Blasio is ahead by over 40pt, and McAuliffe is leading by about 10pt. Drama is sorely lacking in the final week before election day.


It’s not unusual for one or even two of these races to be yawners. There were two fantastic 1989 races in New York and Virginia where African Americans were elected in tight races to their respective positions for the first time, while New Jersey was a blowout victory for Jim Florio. In 1973, there were two 35pt lifeless races in New York and New Jersey, but was saved by a 1pt affair in the Old Dominion.


The difference this year is that all three big races should be called soon after the polls close. I went back over the past 40 years of election results to get an idea of how rare the snoozefest of 2013 is for the after-presidential-off-year election troika. It may end up being historic.


The table here is sorted by the closest contest, and I put in the current Real Clear Politics averages for the 2013 races.


What you see is that only 1985 had a wider margin at 10.41pt for the closest contest than 2013 currently. It’s entirely conceivable that 2013 could beat 1985, especially since the latest Washington Post poll has McAuliffe up by 12pt in Virginia. Therefore, 2013 could actually end up being the most boring general election year for the New Jersey, New York City, Virginia triumvirate since 1973.


A closer look reveals that 1985 and 2013 are really in a completely different world than the larger dataset. More than half the years since 1973 had at least one race where the margin was less than 3pt. Eight out of 11 had at least one race where the margin was mid-single digits or lower. Only 1977, 1985, and 2013 were near or above double digits in their closest race.


What separates 1985 and 2013 from 1977 is the fact that two of the races were or are going to be landslides. Even though none of the 1977 races were nail biters, they were all modestly competitive. None had margins of greater than 14pt. 1985 had – and 2013 looks to ultimately have – two races in which the winning candidate won by more than 25pt.


If 2013 contained two non-blowouts, then there would at least be a decent chance that one might get close in the final week. Maybe there’d be a scandal, or maybe the electoral gods would find some new and interesting way to insert some doubt in the final outcome of one of the races.


As it is, there are no signs that anything is in doubt in 2013. Christie’s lead is expanding, De Blasio’s is steady, and McAuliffe has been widening the gap over the past two months. It’s almost certainly over, unless there is some tremendous surprise.


I guess the good news for the candidates is that they don’t have to worry about the final outcome. For the electoral junkies, it’s a sad, sad state of affairs.





theguardian.com © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds









Comment is free | theguardian.com


Read more about Election night 2013 is shaping up to be a historically boring affair | Harry J Enten and other interesting subjects concerning Internet Spying and Secrecy at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, October 28, 2013

Why the Threat of Recession Keeps Nobel Prize-Winning Economist Up At Night

Why the Threat of Recession Keeps Nobel Prize-Winning Economist Up At Night
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/408c2__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif



American economist Robert Shiller may be a winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize in economic sciences for his research into market prices and asset bubbles, but when The Daily Ticker caught up with him, he wasn’t particularly concerned about current market prices or asset bubbles.


So what keeps the Yale professor and S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index co-founder up at night?


“The world economy is softening a bit,” he tells us in the accompanying interview. “There’s always a chance of another recession. It’s been six years since the last recession started – they tend to come along with some regularity. Congress is now unable to get things done, and so we won’t have a good response if there’s another recession.”


Related: Future of the Housing Market Is ‘A Great Unknown’: Robert Shiller


Daily Ticker guest Jim Rickards told us earlier this month he expects a recession next year because the recovery is already four-years-old and from a business cycle perspective, we are almost at the end of a normal cyclical recovery. He also factored in economic drags like the sequester, government shutdown and the low labor force participation.


Related: Rickards on Fed & Yellen: Here Comes the ‘Helicopter Money’


Check out the video to find out Shiller’s favorite indicator to watch in order to know when a recession is coming.


Tell Us What You Think!


Send an email to: thedailyticker@yahoo.com.


You can also look us up on Twitter and Facebook.


More from The Daily Ticker


Flyer Beware: Southwest Bag Fees Coming Next Year?


Al Gore’s Wrong: Renewable Fuels Are Not Replacing Oil & Natural Gas, Says Oil Expert


Dilbert’s Creator is Proof That Failure Can Lead to Success




Yahoo Finance: The Daily Ticker




Read more about Why the Threat of Recession Keeps Nobel Prize-Winning Economist Up At Night and other interesting subjects concerning Commentary at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

The Night the GOP Cracked Up



Speaker John Boehner leaves the Capitol after 1 a.m. Tuesday. (Jim Bourg/Reuters)

Monday was a frantic day on Capitol Hill, though all the activity ultimately came to nought: A flurry of last-minute legislative feints failed to prevent the government from shutting down at midnight. But in the process, House Republicans’ total crackup was on full, public display.


The breaking point was Speaker John Boehner’s penultimate proposal, a bill that would have funded the government — and Obamacare — while delaying the health-care law’s individual mandate and canceling congressional staffers’ insurance subsidies. To Boehner, this was a major concession from the House’s previous offering — a delay of the entire law. To the White House and Senate Democrats, it was just as unacceptable and no concession at all.


But within the GOP, it provoked a freakout on both Boehner’s right and left flanks. Moderate Republicans, long silent for fear of the party’s angry base, correctly viewed the proposal as inexorably leading to shutdown, and threatened to rise up and block it. “This is going nowhere,” New York Representative Peter King told National Review. He claimed to have 25 members on his side and demanded that Boehner instead put a “clean” government-funding bill — one that didn’t touch health care — on the floor of the House.


Meanwhile, conservatives were also in revolt. The Senate Conservatives Fund sent an email to its supporters denouncing “the Republican establishment in Washington” for telling “lies to help them fund Obamacare.” It accused GOP leaders of using the mandate delay as cover to disguise the fact that they were allowing the rest of the law to go into effect — something the group called unacceptable. Obamacare, the email said, must be stopped “dead in its tracks.” And it helpfully listed the 29 members of the House who might be amenable to this appeal, a group that included such stalwarts as Michele Bachmann, Louie Gohmert, Steve King, Joe Wilson, and Ted Yoho.


If there are, as the Washington Examiner‘s Byron York has reported, about 30 conservatives making Boehner’s life hell, these are surely them. Representative Devin Nunes, a California Republican, told the New York Times that it would not be enough to term his hard-line colleagues lemmings, “because jumping to your death is not enough” for them. He termed them, instead, “lemmings with suicide vests.”


But the various right-wing pressure groups that had pushed the defund-Obamacare quest weren’t unified on this point. While Heritage Action joined the Senate Conservatives Fund in opposition, the Republican Study Committee and the Club for Growth urged members to vote in favor. Suddenly it was impossible even for the most pure-of-heart Tea Party Republican to remain in good standing with their many monitors on the right. When Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, one of the original backers of the defund movement, opined that a shutdown was probably not a good idea, RedState‘s Erick Erickson tweeted, “Rand Paul now wants to fund Obamacare. Sigh.” Texas Senator Ted Cruz also seemed to endorse Boehner’s gambit. If even Rand Paul and Ted Cruz were going squishy, was there anyone conservatives could still trust?


In the end, neither the moderate revolt nor the conservative freakout got much traction with the exhausted House Republicans. After Boehner assured the moderates he had a plan, they mostly went along; only King and Pennsylvania Representative Charlie Dent, another outspoken critic of the far right, voted no. And only four of the conservatives, including Bachmann, joined them. But as the shutdown dawned Tuesday and Boehner groped for a way forward, his family feud was rawer and more visible than ever. There isn’t one House GOP; there are, rather, several warring Republican tribes, and the upshot may be, as Representative Don Young, an Alaska Republican, put it, that Republicans “don’t have the votes to do anything.”






    








Master Feed : The Atlantic



The Night the GOP Cracked Up

Sunday, September 29, 2013

Breaking Bad Series Finale: What Sunday Night Will Mean For the Show"s Legacy

breaking, bad, series, finale:, what, sunday, night, will, mean, for, the, shows, legacy,

Breaking Bad Series Finale: What Sunday Night Will Mean For the Show’s Legacy




There are only two impressions anyone gets to make in life: a first and a last. People say you don’t get a second chance to make a first impression, but you never get to change a last impression. A last impression is the lingering aftertaste. It’s the visual that sticks with us forever.


This Sunday, we’ll be left with our last impression of Breaking Bad. When we look back, the series’ finale is the episode that will stay freshest in our minds. And it will remain there for far longer than any single episode since the pilot.


Breaking Bad’s finale will be the one episode by which the series is measured for the rest of history. It’s the one episode that we’ll evaluate for years to come when we ask, “what did it all mean?”


Only a handful of other shows have garnered anywhere near the fan attention and constant gossip that Breaking Bad has. And so many have had their legacies tarnished by an ending that did not live up to the quality of the series.


There was just as much buzz about Lost a few years ago, until its purgatory ending earned fans’ derision. Battlestar Galactica left an awful lot of resolution to a mystical God that made the characters’ struggles feel pointless. The Sopranos and The Wire left their fair share of fans dissatisfied with their lack of resolution.



But Breaking Bad is not likely to end like the others. This was a show that had a climax in mind, almost from the very beginning. In fact, creator Vince Gilligan has often credited the writers’ strike in 2007 for buying them the time to find out where this show was going — a luxury few creators ever get.


Throughout the entire show there has existed a sense of foreboding, a sense of building towards something. The stakes of one scene escalate the next. The obstacles of one episode become the complications of another. The solutions of one season become the crises of the following. Rachel staying with Ross will not satisfy an audience that has been through this roller coaster. If there was ever a show that felt like it needed an explosive finale, it’s Breaking Bad.


If the finale is a critical failure (which is very unlikely), then the show’s prior greatness will be diminished a little, as the last impression we have of it won’t quite hold up to our memories of the episodes before it. The show will blend into the other mortal members of the TV hall of fame.


On the other hand, if the finale is a success, then it will reflect on even the pilot episode. It will become the turning point in history when people began to take TV more seriously than they did movies.


It’s not difficult to imagine what the future may look like if the finale is the success we all hope it will be. Breaking Bad will become the show that will set the precedent for other shows that have a predetermined ending. It will continue to influence studio execs when their writers ask them for more time to turn around fewer episodes.


Film classes will show episodes of Breaking Bad alongside The Godfather for the next three decades.


Grown men twenty years from now will wear “Better Call Saul” T-shirts instead of Boba Fett ones.



Movies will have to evolve to catch up with TV.

Most writers will tell you that an ending is the hardest part to write. It has to feel earned, yet still surprise. It has to tie up loose ends and bring characters to their final destinations. And while juggling all that, it still has to be at least as fun to watch as everything that came before it.


Matrix BulletsChinatown Ending


Great endings have always been reserved for movies. For decades, it has seemed like this amazing feat could only be achieved by a story near the two-hour range. We can look back on the best TV series finales with fondness, but none of them have produced the same visceral reaction that we get from the endings of Chinatown, The Shawshank Redemption, The Matrix, or The Godfather.


Shawshank EndingGodfather


Breaking Bad is the first show that has a real chance to end like the greatest films have — to make that last impression we can never forget.


Breaking Bad Teaser




PolicyMic



Breaking Bad Series Finale: What Sunday Night Will Mean For the Show"s Legacy

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

Senator Cruz rails through night against Obamacare


U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), denounces

U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), denounces ”Obamacare” as he speaks on the Senate floor on Capitol Hill in Washington, in this still image taken from video, September 24, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/U.S. Senate TV/Handout






WASHINGTON | Wed Sep 25, 2013 6:58am EDT



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Republican Senator Ted Cruz slogged into the second day of his marathon attack on Obamacare from the Senate floor on Wednesday, showing almost no signs of relenting after speaking for nearly 16 hours.


Standing in a nearly empty Senate chamber, Cruz made his case to deny funding to implement President Barack Obama’s landmark overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system, calling it the country’s “biggest jobs killer.”


Most of the Tea Party firebrand’s Republican colleagues shunned his diatribe against the health insurance reform law, which is delaying Senate consideration of a stop-gap funding measure needed to avoid a government shutdown in six days.


Elected from Texas last November, Cruz at times strides the Capitol attired in cowboy boots. But on Wednesday morning, his feet were clad in tennis shoes. In black, they matched his suit.


“Obamacare isn’t working,” the Texas Republican said in between stories about the struggles of his Cuban immigrant father and reciting Doctor Seuss verse. A professed carnivore, he recounted the tribulations of Christmas dinner with his future wife’s vegetarian family.


Cruz began talking at 2:41 p.m. (1841 GMT) on Tuesday. His performance had the look of a filibuster, a procedural hurdle used to block legislation. Except in this case, it won’t.


Under Senate rules, Cruz must yield the floor by noon (1600 GMT) on Wednesday for a procedural vote that will start the Senate towards final passage of the bill to keep government agencies funded through November 15 — including Obamacare money.


In the early hours of Wednesday morning, Cruz was joined on the Senate floor only by Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah, who provided him short breaks from speaking. Lee and Cruz spent the summer whipping up conservative anger against the healthcare law.


As dawn approached, Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida, also a Tea Party conservative, took the lectern, giving a Cruz a break, which the Texas lawmaker used to stretch with knee bends on the Senate’s floor.


Republicans agree with Cruz’ contention that Obamacare is a “disaster,” but most of the 46 Senate Republicans are expected to line up instead with their party leaders in support of the emergency spending bill.


Cruz wants to block the funding measure unless it contains no money to implement Obamacare.


Polls show most Americans oppose the health care law despite its goals of providing healthcare coverage to millions of uninsured people, but even more oppose a government shutdown.


Provided Cruz can remain on his feet, he could go on for several more hours until a procedural vote scheduled for midday on Wednesday.


“I intend to speak in support of defunding Obamacare until I am no longer able to stand,” he said as he started his pitch.


Cruz went on to talk about his father “flippin’ pancakes,” making “green eggs and ham,” “the travesty of Obamacare,” and, proudly, about his unpopularity among many fellow Republicans.


Practically every day, he said: “I now pick up the newspaper to learn what a scoundrel I am.”


The Republican-controlled House of Representatives last week passed a version of the spending measure that denied funds to Obamacare. That will be stripped from the Senate version, which also will be shorter to


The House will have to decide whether to pass the revised bill or find a compromise with the Senate. Unless new funding is quickly approved, a government shutdown would begin on Tuesday.


At this point, it is unclear what the House Republican leadership would do, generating plenty of anxiety among their own members.


A House aide said of her boss: “He is definitely stressed.”


The aide said the congressman opposes a shutdown but is under pressure from constituents to stop Obamacare.


Republicans uniformly want to repeal Obamacare. But many see that as a political impossibility as long as Democrats control the Senate and hold the presidency.


ON NOTICE


Club for Growth, a conservative group influential among Republicans, put senators on notice that it expected them to support Cruz’s bid and block Democrats from eliminating the provision to defund Obamacare.


But Cruz’s fellow Republicans were moving in the other direction one day after the party’s top two leaders in the Senate, Mitch McConnell and John Cornyn, refused to lend their support to Cruz.


Senator Orrin Hatch, the senior Republican on the Finance Committee that oversees Obamacare, announced he would side with McConnell rather than Cruz.


Senator Lindsey Graham said he expects a majority of the Senate’s Republicans to reject Cruz’s strategy, which risks a government shutdown that would likely be blamed on Republicans.


“I think most Republicans believe, no matter how sincere you are about defunding Obamacare, that this approach would blow up in our face,” Graham said.


Once the battle over the government funding bill is resolved, Congress will grapple with another fiscal crisis – a possible and unprecedented U.S. government default unless it agrees to raise the $ 16.7 trillion U.S. borrowing authority by sometime next month or early November.


Republicans are expected to place demands on any bill to increase the debt limit, including one to delay for a year implementation of Obamacare, now set to begin kicking in next month.


(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan; Editing by W Simon)


(This story was refiled to remove duplicate paragraph)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



Senator Cruz rails through night against Obamacare

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Saturday Night Cigar Lounge July 20th

sncl_logocdnWhen:Saturday, June 29th, 10pm Eastern/7pm Pacific


Where: Saturday Night Cigar Lounge with Taylor on Blog Talk Radio


What: Saturday nights were meant for cigars and politics.


Hear Taylor and his co-host Liz Harrison talk about everything from the past week – from politics, to news, to books, and entertainment. Whatever comes to mind, and of course, sobriety is not likely.


Tonight: It’s time for another Saturday Night Cigar Lounge. This time Brandon Morse visits to talk Misfit Politics and #Merica. Plus an interview with Reason’s Shikha Dalmia on Detroit.



Listen to internet radio with CDNews Radio on BlogTalkRadio


Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Post to Reddit Post to Technorati



Conservative Daily News



Saturday Night Cigar Lounge July 20th