Showing posts with label Didn't. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Didn't. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 1, 2014

Obama Declares "There"s No Good Reason to Go Back," Claims WH Didn"t Try Hard to Market Obamacare

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



var addthis_config = "data_track_clickback":false,"data_track_addressbar":false,"data_track_textcopy":false,"ui_atversion":"300";
var addthis_product = "wpp-3.5.9";



Obama Declares "There"s No Good Reason to Go Back," Claims WH Didn"t Try Hard to Market Obamacare

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

25 Extremely Disturbing Facts You Wish You Didn’t Know




Published on Oct 31, 2013 – by list25



Tweet this video! - http://clicktotweet.com/faKHc


You’ve been warned. Reading or watching this list will probably change the way you act, eat, sleep, and view Koala bears. These are 25 extremely disturbing facts you wish you didn’t know.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkugC1HPjhs




This entry was posted in Videos. Bookmark the permalink.

156





25 Extremely Disturbing Facts You Wish You Didn’t Know

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Democratic Mayor, Eyewitness To Alleged Chris Christie Strongarming: Nope, Didn’t Hear It


HotAir.com:

As Ed wrote this morning and Guy Benson has covered exhaustively all weekend, the allegations mounted by Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer on MSNBC now amount to several diary entries and a bunch of holes.

First, the central question. Did Hoboken get fewer Sandy funds than it needed or deserved? Are there actual damages to which one might tie this alleged political corruption? The original MSNBC report played fast and loose with the numbers to leave that impression, but the reality is Hoboken got millions in relief funds, but perhaps not in the exact amounts Zimmer was requesting. Guy Benson:

The original MSNBC story leaves the distinct impression that the city received less than $ 350,000 in aid out of a $ 127 million request. In fact, Christie’s office points out, Hoboken has benefited from nearly $ 70 million in federal and state recovery and relief funding — which they say is commensurate with aid received by similarly situated municipalities. They emphasize that not a single grant application from Hoboken was denied.


MSNBC’s report, Christie aides say, conflated total aid with the much narrower issue of “hazard mitigation” funds. They concede that Zimmer did, in fact, request more than $ 100 million in hazard mitigation assistance — which at the time accounted for more than one-third of the entire available budget allocated for that purpose.

Her story has changed. First, it was that Christie withheld Sandy funds because she didn’t endorse him, according to this New Jersey reporter:

Matt Katz @mattkatz00





8 days ago Hoboken Mayor told @WNYC & @GonzalezSarahA her loss of Sandy aid was tied to failure to endorse @GovChristie. Now different story










Politik Ditto



Democratic Mayor, Eyewitness To Alleged Chris Christie Strongarming: Nope, Didn’t Hear It

Friday, January 10, 2014

Why FDR Didn’t End the Great Depression – and Why Obama Won’t End This One


From Cambridge University in 1932-1933, John Maynard Keynes observed a promising new U.S. president presiding over what he saw as half-baked and confused policies, while labor insurgency was mounting. Roosevelt’s measures were, Keynes conceded, without precedent, but novelty was not enough. Long-term commitment to direct federal employment was required. For Keynes, this was the bottom line. (For a detailed analysis of Keynes’s prescriptions for eliminating unemployment, see Alan Nasser, “What Keynes Really Prescribed,” CounterPunch subscription edition, volume 19, number 19, 2012)


Existing programs were not only too small, but they were also either temporary (Civilian Conservation Corps and Civil Works Administration) or irrationally tied to the severely weakened states’ ability to raise substantial revenues on their own (Federal Emergency Relief Act and Public Works Administration). CWA had come closest to the kind of commitment Keynes thought indispensable, but it suffered two fatal defects: it was temporary, designed only to help workers get through the harsh winter of 1933, and of all these programs it was the object of Roosevelt’s greatest suspicion. Roosevelt feared that CWA would raise workers’ expectations of what they could permanently expect from government.


 The Dawn of the New Deal and Keynes’s 1933 Letter


The president’s instincts were solidly anti-federalist; there must be no permanent direct government provision of what it is the proper function of the private sector to provide. (1) Roosevelt wanted relatively small, temporary federal efforts on behalf of workers, with the states primarily responsible for the provision of social benefits in the long run. Keynes urged large, permanent programs supplying employment during both economic contractions and expansions, provided directly by the federal government. He communicated his concern to Roosevelt in an open letter published in The New York Times on December 31, 1933. (2)


In the letter he expressed his extreme distress at Roosevelt’s timid policy. “At the moment your sympathizers in England are nervous and sometimes despondent. We wonder whether the order of different urgencies is rightly understood, whether there is a confusion of aim, and whether some of the advice you get is not crack-brained and queer.” He then outlined his alternative analysis.


The basic issue, Keynes insisted, is “Recovery,” whose object is “to increase the national output and put more men to work.” An increase in output depends on “the amount of purchasing power… which is expected to come on the market.” Recovery depends upon increasing purchasing power. There are, Keynes pointed out, three factors operating to raise purchasing power and output. The first is increased consumer spending out of current income, the second is increased investment by capitalists, and the third is that “public authority must be called in aid to create additional current incomes through the expenditure of borrowed or printed money.”


Since the vast majority of consumers are workers, increased consumption expenditure is impossible on the required scale during a period of high unemployment and low wages. Business investment will eventually materialize, but only “after the tide has been turned by the expenditures of public authority.” Government investment in employment-generating public works must come first. Only after large-scale government investment can private investment be expected to kick in.


A compelling logic is implicit in that observation. According to the orthodoxy Keynes is criticizing, a revival of aggregate investment by the class of capitalists is necessary and sufficient to constitute recovery. But investment by an individual capitalist in a severe downturn would be irrational. So each capitalist will defer investment until there is evidence of recovery, i.e. evidence that the other capitalists have undertaken productive outlays. Uh-oh: a structural contradiction is in place. If each investor refrains from investment until all the others invest, no capitalist will invest. Each will die waiting for the others to come across. In the absence of an external impetus to the private investment system, the depression will be endless. Recovery is possible, then, only if a force external to the private market gets the ball rolling. Enter government to the rescue. “[T]he tide has been turned.”


Hence Keynes’s conviction that only government expenditures on a grand scale can breathe life back into a depressed economy. Keynes suggested as an example of what he had in mind “the rehabilitation of the physical condition of the railroads.” He would later, in a 1938 letter, recommend a national program of public housing as a project on the required scale.


The crisis was not merely economic. Keynes had witnessed the rise of revolutionary movements in response to the protracted inability of capitalism to meet the needs of working people. He had written about both the Bolshevik revolution and the tendency of austerity to spawn revolt from the Right. Keynes was antipathetic to both fascist and worker rule, and feared revolutionary consequences should the New Deal fail. “If you fail,” he wrote Roosevelt, “rational change will be gravely prejudiced throughout the world, leaving orthodoxy and revolution to fight it out.” The political stakes were high, as they must be under conditions of protracted capitalist austerity.


The stakes are no less high now. The current contraction emerged from a political-economic settlement, the post-Golden-Age period from 1974 to the present, resembling in relevant respects the Depression-prone economy of the 1920s.




disinformation



Why FDR Didn’t End the Great Depression – and Why Obama Won’t End This One

Friday, December 27, 2013

10 Things You Didn"t Know About AllTime10s

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



10 Things You Didn"t Know About AllTime10s

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Gulf of Tonkin: McNamara admits It didn"t happen.

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Gulf of Tonkin: McNamara admits It didn"t happen.

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Report: Family says they tipped gay waitress, didnt leave note about lifestyle

Report: Family says they tipped gay waitress, didnt leave note about lifestyle
http://thedailynewsreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/de784__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif


posted on Nov, 26 2013 @ 10:08 AM


There is no oppression, in this story, if the person really received their tip.
Maybe it was another table that did this? I don’t know.
Maybe the waitress just wanted attention so she made it up?

But, if she didn’t receive a tip, due to her sexual orientation only, then yes, that would be oppression.


BTW, does it say how any of these customers would even know she was gay? Is that the first thing she says when walking up to the table?


For pete’s sake, don’t most people give tips or not, based on the services they receive? To be honest, I don’t care what you look like, or your life style, as long as you are cleanly, just be good at your job, and I’ll be pleasant, and you will be tipped well. Easy enough.




AboveTopSecret.com New Topics In Breaking Alternative News




Read more about Report: Family says they tipped gay waitress, didnt leave note about lifestyle and other interesting subjects concerning Top Stories at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, November 11, 2013

Carlos Maza: Fox News Falsely Claims Chris Christie Didn"t Veto Marriage Equality Legislation


Fox News attempted to  paint  Gov. Chris Christie as a moderate on social issues, falsely claiming that he had refused to veto legislation that would have legalized same-sex marriage in New Jersey.


On the November 10 edition of Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Fox News reporter Carl Cameron discussed Gov. Christie’s political reputation among conservatives, citing his decision not to veto marriage equality legislation in 2013 as evidence that Christie might not appeal to social conservatives:


The reason Christie didn’t veto a marriage equality bill in 2013 is because he had already vetoed it in 2012 despite widespread public support for the measure. Christie cited his personal opposition to marriage equality and was widely criticized for the suggestion that the issue should be put up for a public vote.


State lawmakers struggled – and are still struggling - to gather enough votes to override that veto.


When a New Jersey lower court ruled on September 27 that the state must allow same-sex couples to marry, Christie’s administration appealed the decision and warned of “far-reaching implications” if same-sex marriages weren’t delayed until the appeals process was completed.


It wasn’t until New Jersey’s Supreme Court refused Christie’s request for a delay that he finally dropped his appeal effort, reiterating that he “strongly disagrees” with the court’s decision.


In October, Christie stated that he would continue to oppose marriage equality even if one of his children turned out to be gay


Gov. Christie may still have trouble courting social conservatives, but his unwillingness to stand in the way of marriage equality legislation won’t be the reason why. 




Media Matters for America



Carlos Maza: Fox News Falsely Claims Chris Christie Didn"t Veto Marriage Equality Legislation

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Teens Now More Likely To Get Genital Herpes Because They Didn"t Get Cold Sores As Kids


Kids these days! Strangely enough, they are less likely to have been exposed to herpes simplex virus type 1 in early childhood, according to a new study. That means they don’t get cold sores as elementary schoolers, but it also means when they become sexually active, they don’t have immunity to help protect them against the virus in… other regions of their bodies.


I remember learning in elementary school that there’s oral herpes and genital herpes and never the twain shall meet. It seems these distinctions are blurring with younger Americans, however. An increasing proportion of genital herpes infections in industrialized countries now stem from herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), or the “cold sore” virus, instead of HSV-2, which people usually get from sexual contact.


The increasing popularity of oral sex may contribute to the shift in infection types, the study’s researchers, a team from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, wrote in their study. Meanwhile, HSV-2 infections aren’t decreasing, so teens may be more likely to get genital herpes in general, the study reports. Both HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections last people’s entire lives and have no known cure.


Back in these teens’ parents’ time—or really, just a decade ago—most genital herpes infections came from HSV-2. On the other hand, people contracted HSV-1 as children, from skin-to-skin contact with infected adults. Kisses, sharing drinks, and other normal interactions passed to children the virus that might, in some kids, give them occasional cold sores; in others, the virus stayed dormant. Either way, the virus could trigger the body to develop immunity against contracting HSV-1 later in life, in other parts of the body. 


The new study didn’t analyze why kids now get HSV-1 less often. But Marcelo Laufer, a pediatric infectious disease specialist who was not involved in the new research, told HealthDay it might be because parents now have better hygienic practices. 


The CDC researchers studied herpes viruses in blood samples from Americans aged 14 to 49 in different time periods. When the researchers compared their numbers from 1999 to 2004 and 2005 to 2010, they found the frequency of HSV-1 in Americans declined by about 7 percent. HSV-2 infection rates remained the same.


The decline was most dramatic in teens aged 14 through 19. In 1999-2004, about 39 percent of teens had HSV-1. In 2005-2010, about 30 percent had the virus. Compared to teens in 1976-1980, teens in 2005-2010 were 29 percent less likely to have HSV-1. 


There’s a small silver lining. Genital HSV-1 infections break out in sores less often and undergo viral shedding—the process through which the virus travels to the surface of the skin and could infect others—less often than genital HSV-2 infections.


The CDC researchers published their work yesterday in The Journal of Infectious Diseases.


[Infectious Diseases Society of America via EurekAlert, HealthDay]


Bonus: HPV Vaccine Doesn’t Make Kids More Sexually Active


In other news about the same body parts, recent studies have found kids who get the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine do not become sexually active at earlier ages than unvaccinated kids, according to a review in the journal Preventive MedicineThe HPV vaccine immunizes kids against many of the viruses that cause genital warts and cervical cancer. U.S. health agencies recommend girls and boys get the vaccination at age 11 or 12, but some parents have cited concerns that giving their children a vaccine against sexually transmitted infections may encourage them to have sex earlier. The review also examines evidence about the side effects and safety of the vaccine, which the authors conclude is “quite safe.”




Popular Science



Teens Now More Likely To Get Genital Herpes Because They Didn"t Get Cold Sores As Kids

Sunday, October 20, 2013

Cruz: GOP lost because they didn’t accuse Dems of holding children ‘hostage’


By David Edwards
Sunday, October 20, 2013 10:57 EDT


Ted Cruz speaks to CNN







  • Print Friendly and PDF

  • Email this page


  • Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) says that Republicans could have won the fight to derail President Barack Obama’s health care law by shutting down the government if they had just accused the Democrats holding children with cancer “hostage.”


    In an interview that aired on Sunday, CNN’s Dana Bash asked Cruz if he was bothered on a “human level” that so many colleagues in his own party were angry at him for instigating the shutdown.


    “Not remotely,” Cruz insisted. “I work for 26 million Texans, that’s my job to fight for them. I don’t work for the party bosses in Washington… The reason people are frustrated all over the country is that far too many people get elected and they think they’re there to be part of the club.”


    The Texas senator observed that things could have turned out differently if Senate Republicans had “marched into battle side by side” with House Republicans to defund Obamacare.


    But Bash noted that Democrats had the successful strategy in the end.


    Cruz, however, reminded Bash of an exchange she had with Senate Majority Harry Reid (D-NV) about a Republican plan to fund the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other selective parts of the government during the shutdown.


    A controversy had erupted at the time when Bash asked Reid if it would be worth it if he could help “one child” with cancer.


    During the interview that aired on Sunday, Cruz said that Reid showed Democrats were “vulnerable” and that Republicans should have used children with cancer as a pressure point to win the fight against health care reform.


    “President Obama and the Democrats’ position throughout this is, ‘We will not negotiate, we will not compromise, shut it all down.’ That’s not a reasonable position,” he explained. “If Senate Republicans had united and supported House Republicans, if we had 46 Senate Republicans on television every day, in the media every day making the point, ‘Why won’t they fund the VA, why are they holding our veterans hostage? Why won’t they fund the NIH, why are they holding kids with illnesses hostage?’”


    “That’s a fight we could win because their position was unreasonable.”


    Watch the video below from CNN’s State of the Union, recorded Oct. 20, 2013.







    The Raw Story



    Cruz: GOP lost because they didn’t accuse Dems of holding children ‘hostage’

Friday, September 27, 2013

The Surge Didn’t Work, Or How Can We Continue to Ignore Iraq?

203fe57238fbf71d3b0f6a706700e536


Children tend to have a tough time focusing on too many ideas at once. The same goes for adults who have the brain capacity of children.


Syria stories obviously soared in the media over the past month, and rightly so given that the Obama administration was going drag the U.S. into another unnecessary war based on false pretenses. Iran, too, have shot up in the body of international stories the U.S. media is covering, given new developments towards a possible diplomatic settlement to long simmering tensions. And again, rightly so.


But two big issues sometimes seems like the upper limit of how many separate ideas the major media can juggle at one time (unless of course we’re talking about celebrity gossip, the Michael Jackson death trial, and whether hot tubs can make you infertile).


Here’s what brought on this rant…




Yousef Munayyer is Executive Director of The Palestine Center and he lists these facts about Iraq, I suspect, in order to highlight how much chaos is still ongoing in the country that the U.S. needlessly and criminally tore apart for the past two decades.


One of the reasons it is really important to cover the ongoing violence in Iraq and its larger context of U.S. policy is because the myth of the success of “the surge” is still being peddled, particularly on the right. Senator John McCain, you’ll remember, excoriated Chuck Hagel during his confirmation process for at one point criticizing the surge in Iraq as potentially “dangerous.” He and others have had the gall to scream at people for dissenting on the surge religion even while Iraqis are dying in “numbers not seen since the bloody days of 2004,” as Kelley Vlahos wrote in these spaces last month.


Not only is Iraq on the verge of all out civil war, but the U.S.-backed Shiite government in Baghdad is increasingly authoritarian and is contributing to the country’s ongoing demise. The Sunni-Shia violence in Iraq is, as the International Crisis Group (ICG) puts it, “as acute and explosive as ever” primarily because “Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki has implemented a divide-and-conquer strategy that has neutered any credible Sunni Arab leadership.”


Maliki has had his security forces detain and brutally torture thousands of political opponents in secret prisons and denied them access to legal counsel. Amnesty International reported this week that Iraq executed 13 men following unfair trials plagued by allegations of torture. “Iraq is one of the world’s most prolific executioners,” the report states.


So, the U.S. waged war against Iraq in 1991 and followed up with more than a decade of sanctions that decimated the country and was described as one UN official at “genocidal.” Then the U.S. invaded and occupied the country in a war of choice based on lies, ripping what was left of the country to shreds in the process. And now U.S. troops have left and Washington continues to send  about $ 2 billion, not including the additional billions of dollars worth of military training and equipment, to the corrupt and authoritarian regime in Baghdad that is driving the country into civil war.


How can decent Americans ignore this?




Antiwar.com Blog



The Surge Didn’t Work, Or How Can We Continue to Ignore Iraq?

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Beth Israel congregants reflect on 10 years of protests at synagogue: ‘We certainly didn’t ask for this’

 and nearly a dozen other members of his group it’s another day of protest.As they begin to set up along Washtenaw Avenue outside the synagogue, they each pick which messages they’ll be carrying this day.  


Signs with attention-grabbing statements like “Zionism Enabled Nazism,” “Israel: No Right To Exist,” and “Is Ethnic Cleansing a Judaic Value?” eventually line the sidewalks as congregants make their way inside for their weekly Sabbath morning services.


Other signs in the protesters’ arsenal read “End Jewish Supremacism in Palestine,” “Israel: Not Good for the Jews,” and “Ethnic Supremacism: Wrong in Germany, Wrong in Israel.”


Ann Arbor resident Shirley Zempel, who waved a Palestinian flag outside the synagogue on Saturday morning, said a yearning for justice drives her to protest Israel.


“I just think this is the most unjust issue there is everywhere and I think it’s misunderstood a lot,” she said of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “Everybody seems to think the Jews are just so holy that you can’t say anything about them or to them, but they’re not, and what they’re doing is not right.”


Several cars honk their horns as they pass by, which the protesters take to mean they have some support in the community, but they also have their fair share of detractors.




Rabbi_Robert_Dobrusin_082313_RJS_001.jpgRabbi Robert Dobrusin of the Beth Israel Congregation in Ann Arbor poses for a portrait inside the synagogue on a recent morning.



Over the past decade, members of the Beth Israel Congregation have witnessed literally hundreds of protests outside their synagogue.


Some congregants describe the wall of anti-Israel protesters as “the gauntlet,” and they say it’s taken a toll on the congregation over time.


“It’s just disappointing for a community of this kind that this is the way these opinions are being reflected,” said Rabbi Robert Dobrusin. “There are serious discussions that can be had about what’s going on in the Middle East, but this is not the way to have them.”


Herskovitz and members of a group he founded called Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends have used Beth Israel as the venue for their anti-Israel demonstrations since 2003, as they’ve called attention to the plight of Palestinians and what they describe as brutal actions by the Israeli military.


The group’s behavior is once again being scrutinized as Sept. 13 marks the 10th anniversary of the protests. Herskovitz said they have no plans of relenting.


“The real suffering is happening in Palestine,” he said. “We’re not stopping anybody from praying and we’re not harassing anybody.”


Congregation leaders, including Rabbi Dobrusin, said they still don’t see why the protesters choose to target their synagogue since they don’t control the Israeli government.


A coalition of local faith leaders is calling on the Ann Arbor City Council to mark the 10th anniversary of the protests by taking a renewed stance against the group.


The council has publicly denounced the group’s behavior before, though city officials acknowledge what the protesters are doing is constitutionally protected free speech.


“Without overstepping our bounds on the freedom of speech rights of those who protest, there’s nothing we can do about it legally,” said Mayor John Hieftje.


Hieftje added, “I think it’ll only stop when the people who are out on the street become sensible and agree to be reasonable about the issue — and start to understand that trying to affect an international issue by picketing a local place of worship is the wrong way to get anything done.”



Henry_Herskovitz_082013_RJS_002.jpgHenry Herskovitz, who proudly flies an anti-Israel flag in his front yard and has butted heads with everyone from his neighbors to city officials, says he might be the most-hated man in Ann Arbor. His shirt features the cartoon character Handala, a symbol of the Palestinian struggle for justice.



Herskovitz said his group isn’t blaming the synagogue for the actions of a foreign government — just holding the congregation accountable for supporting the state of Israel.


He said there’s no better venue for the protests than a place whose name in Hebrew means “House of Israel,” and a place that displays the Israeli flag in its sanctuary and prays for the state of Israel.


“Everybody in that building is culpable, responsible for their support of a racist, apartheid state,” he said. “Clearly they don’t pull the levers of the Israeli government, but who does? That’s in large part the Israel lobby in this country, of which Beth Israel is a huge part.”


Congregants have responded in different ways to the protesters. Most have chosen not to engage them. Barry Gross actually helped organize a system whereby congregants pledge to donate money to humanitarian causes for every protester who shows up on Saturdays.


“It’s a shame we have to do stuff like this, but we at least feel better about it,” Gross said. “We’ve tried to make this into something good.”


Gross said they’ve raised more than $ 180,000 over the years for Magen David Adom, which is the Israeli Red Cross, and Neve Shalom/Wahat al-Salam, a cooperative village jointly founded by Israeli Jews and Israeli Palestinian Arabs to show they can live side by side in peace.


Jeff_Bernstein_headshot_2013.jpg


Jeff Bernstein, past president of the congregation, laments that his 9-year-old son has never experienced a Saturday morning service without protesters. Bernstein has served on the congregation’s protest response committee for the past decade.


“As a committee, we’ve dealt with things as they’ve come up, but really we cannot make this end,” he said.


Bernstein said people come to synagogue for various reasons. Sometimes it’s for a wedding, a bar/bat mitzvah, or a funeral.


“And every Saturday for the last 10 years — whether you have been in a celebratory, contemplative or sorrowful mood — there are people standing outside holding signs that compare us to Nazis, and holding this congregation and its members accountable for things we have absolutely no control over,” he said.


Matt Kaplan, the current president of the congregation, and Bernstein both believe the protesters’ messages have become increasingly anti-Jewish.


“What I’ve seen over the past 10 years is a group whose message has gotten more and more hostile, and more and more offensive,” Kaplan said.



Matt_Kaplan_headshot_2013.jpg“At the beginning, a lot of this rhetoric talked about Israel. But over the years it’s now talking more about Jews and Judaism, and that’s not an insignificant shift,” Bernstein said.



Herskovitz noted he himself is Jewish, though he said he had a falling out with his faith years ago. He said he used to attend Beth Israel, but he hasn’t been to a service in years. He was turned away from attending a holiday service in 2004 because of his protesting.


“We’re not protesting Jews per se or Judaism per se,” he said. “We are protesting the strength and power of the Jewish community and how they lend their power to supporting the state of Israel.”


The congregation’s board of directors issued a statement July 31 supporting the resumption of peace negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. The congregation has on several occasions voiced support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.


Dobrusin also signed his name to a letter sent to U.S. Sens. Carl Levin and Debbie Stabenow, urging the U.S. to engage both sides in a process to draw borders to create a viable and contiguous Palestinian state. Once the border and security arrangements are agreed upon, the letter stated, Israel should withdraw from all territories designated for the Palestinian state.


“A peace treaty between the Palestinians and Israelis, resulting in a Palestinian state, we hope will free Palestinians of any kind of oppression,” Dobrusin said.



Israel_protest_082413_RJS_004.jpgAnn Arbor resident Shirley Zempel, who waved a Palestinian flag outside the synagogue on Saturday morning, said a yearning for justice drives her to protest Israel.



Herskovitz and his group aren’t interested in a two-state solution. They’re calling for elimination of Israel altogether and creation of a Palestinian state.


“You can’t say ‘free Palestine’ without saying ‘end Israel’ because it’s a zero-sum game,” he said. “It’s kind of like rooting for Ohio State and Michigan — one only wins if the other loses.”


Herskovitz has been flying an anti-Israel flag outside his home for more than a year. Several of his neighbors have pleaded with him to take it down, but he refuses.


He filed a police report recently after someone allegedly snuck into his yard and snapped the flag pole. The flag was wired with a padlock, he said, so it wasn’t taken.


Herskovitz said he would agree to stop the protests outside Beth Israel if the congregation would take down the Israeli flag inside its sanctuary.


Congregation leaders said they feel no obligation to respond to the protesters’ demands. Dobrusin said the Israeli flag, which is not far from an American flag in the sanctuary, was there before he arrived 25 years ago and he sees no reason to remove it.


“It does not mean we endorse every decision made by the Israeli government,” he said. “To me, what it’s about is our identification with the people of the state of Israel, our hopes for their security and their prosperity, and our recognition of what Israel means to our people.”


Herskovitz acknowledged his group’s protests have waned over the years. There used to be about 15 protesters each Saturday, he said, and now there’s about seven on average.



Israel_protest_082413_RJS_005.jpgMembers of the anti-Israel group Jewish Witnesses for Peace and Friends begin protesting outside the Beth Israel Congregation on Saturday morning. They point to a recent Congressional Research Service report that shows the United States has provided $ 118 billion worth of assistance to Israel since 1949, mostly in the form of military assistance.



“Death has claimed four,” he said. “I’m 67 and I’m the youngest guy out there now. One of our ladies, Lee Booth, she’s 83 years old.”


In the early days, Herskovitz said, the police were out at the protests every Saturday, but they’ve since left the group alone.


The group is planning to celebrate the 10th anniversary privately, Herskovitz said, but they won’t be doing anything publicly other than “business as usual.”


Congregants said they’ve been thankful to see consistent support from the community. The mayor visited the synagogue last year and expressed his regrets about the continuing protests.


“I’ve been working on this issue for years,” Hieftje said. “We’ve worked with our attorneys. We’ve looked into it deeply. We’ve tried to do everything we can.”


Council Member Jane Lumm, an Independent who represents the 2nd Ward, said she wants the city to continue exploring possible solutions.


“I’ve got to believe there are some incremental things we can do so that they can exercise their freedom of speech and not do it in such an in-your-face, offensive way,” she said.



Israel_protest_082413_RJS_006.jpgAnti-Israel protester Rudy List sits next to a sign urging an end to U.S. aid for Israel.



In late 2012, the Interfaith Council for Peace and Justice called for an end to the protests. City Council Member Chuck Warpehoski, D-5th Ward, is the director of that group.


“All the analysis that I’ve done tells me it’s constitutionally protected speech, and I personally don’t want to go anywhere close to restricting free speech,” Warpehoski said. “But if it’s reprehensible, I’ll say it’s reprehensible.”


Kaplan said the protests have felt more and more like harassment of a single institution as time has gone on.


“The question is how long does this go on and what does it say about Ann Arbor?” he said. “What if this kind of behavior spreads to other places in Ann Arbor? I just think it’s really negative for our congregation and for civic culture here and it accomplishes absolutely nothing.”


Bernstein said the only person who can stop the protests is the person who started them, and that’s Herskovitz.


“We at Beth Israel remain true to who we are,” he said. “We certainly didn’t ask for this. We certainly don’t enjoy it. We wouldn’t wish it upon anybody. We hope it ends.”


http://annarbor.com/news/beth-israel-congregants-reflect-on-10-years-of-protests-outside-synagogue-we-certainly-didnt-ask-for
/






Beth Israel congregants reflect on 10 years of protests at synagogue: ‘We certainly didn’t ask for this’

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Investor’s Business Daily Finds: Feds Economic Boost Didn’t Help Much

Federal Reserve program to buy bonds has done ‘little’ to improve U.S. economy.



The Federal Reserve has spent more than $ 2 trillion buying up assets since 2008 (often government bonds and mortgage securities) in an attempt to shore up the economy. Proponents argued what was called “quantitative easing” or QE was necessary “based on the idea that without it, the nation’s economy would have imploded,” according to Investor’s Business Daily.


But a new Fed study that looked at the $ 600 billion QE2 program suggests that wasn’t the case, IBD reported on the front page of its Aug. 20 edition.


Fed economists from the San Francisco and New York Federal Reserve Banks found that “Asset purchase programs like QE2 [second round of quantitative easing] appear to have, at best, moderate effects on economic growth and inflation.”


How much did the QE stimulus boost the economy? IBD wrote that the study found it “likely boosted GDP by a mere 0.13 percentage point.” In other words, “$ 600 billion in QE2 spending boosted GDP by less than $ 200 billion.”


IBD said it isn’t sure the Fed will be able to sell off those debts without an impact on the economy: “Once the Fed begins selling off its massive $ 3.6 trillion in assets acquired under the QE program (see chart), it will send interest rates surging and tank the economy.”


The business newspaper also criticized the Fed program for becoming “the No. 1 enabler of a spendthrift government that’s pushing us to the brink of fiscal disaster.”






Investor’s Business Daily Finds: Feds Economic Boost Didn’t Help Much

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

¡Yanqui, No!: Why Latin America Didn"t Join Washington"s Counterterrorism Posse

This story first appeared on the TomDispatch website.

The map tells the story. To illustrate a damning new report, “Globalizing Torture: CIA Secret Detentions and Extraordinary Rendition,” recently published by the Open Society Institute, the Washington Post put together an equally damning graphic: it’s soaked in red, as if with blood, showing that in the years after 9/11, the CIA turned just about the whole world into a gulag archipelago.

Back in the early twentieth century, a similar red-hued map was used to indicate the global reach of the British Empire, on which, it was said, the sun never set. It seems that, between 9/11 and the day George W. Bush left the White House, CIA-brokered torture never saw a sunset either.

All told, of the 190-odd countries on this planet, a staggering 54 participated in various ways in this American torture system, hosting CIA “black site” prisons, allowing their airspace and airports to be used for secret flights, providing intelligence, kidnapping foreign nationals or their own citizens and handing them over to US agents to be “rendered” to third-party countries like Egypt and Syria. The hallmark of this network, Open Society writes, has been torture. Its report documents the names of 136 individuals swept up in what it says is an ongoing operation, though its authors make clear that the total number, implicitly far higher, “will remain unknown” because of the “extraordinary level of government secrecy associated with secret detention and extraordinary rendition.”

No region escapes the stain. Not North America, home to the global gulag’s command center. Not Europe, the Middle East, Africa, or Asia. Not even social-democratic Scandinavia. Sweden turned over at least two people to the CIA, who were then rendered to Egypt, where they were subject to electric shocks, among other abuses. No region, that is, except Latin America.

Continue Reading »

Politics | Mother Jones


¡Yanqui, No!: Why Latin America Didn"t Join Washington"s Counterterrorism Posse