Showing posts with label Know. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Know. Show all posts

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Should Your Kids Know How to Bug Out…from School?


hiking-backpack-through-grass-friendsThe Organic Prepper


There are many alarming trends throughout the American public school system, and one of the most unsettling relates to “terror drills.”


Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars wrote last week about “lockdown drills” run by the DHS:


The Department of Homeland Security is expanding its operations by running unannounced school lockdown drills, another sign of the federal agency’s encroachment into more areas of Americans’ lives.  


“On Thursday, March 6, a team comprised of ten officials from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the Essex County Prosecutor’s Office, and the NJ Department of Education’s Safety and Security Task Forces visited Glen Ridge High School to conduct an unannounced school lock-down drill,” reports Georgette Gilmore…

While authorities justify school lockdown drills as necessary exercises to prepare for potential school shootings, the likelihood of one happening is miniscule. Critics have pointed to the fact that the drills achieve little else than traumatizing school children.


Some have also argued that teaching kids to “shelter in place” rather than evacuate the scene of a shooting is bad advice because it is likely to lead to more casualties. The process of having children submit to armed masked men during school lockdown drills is also contradictory in that it teaches them to behave exactly the same way towards an actual gunman.(source)



But a quick drill with guns pointed at children are not even the worst of the drills being performed. Another type of drill began occurring in 2012. These are called “evacuation drills” or “relocation drills” and the kids are put on a bus and taken to a location that is not disclosed to parents. Michael Snyder wrote:


All over the United States, school children are being taken out of their classrooms, put on buses and sent to “alternate locations” during terror drills…In the years since 9/11 and the Columbine school shootings, there has been a concerted effort to make school emergency drills much more “realistic” and much more intense.    Unfortunately, the fact that many of these drills are deeply traumatizing many children does not seem to bother too many people.  Do we really need to have “active shooter” drills where men point guns at our kids and fire blanks at them?  Do we really need to have “relocation drills” where kids are rapidly herded on to buses and told that they must surrender their cell phones because they will not be allowed to call anyone? (source)



During these drills kids are not allowed to phone their parents and parents are not even allowed to know where their children are in many cases.  In some incidences during which the school forewarns parents about the drill, the parents are told that they cannot pick up their children “for any reason” during the drill.  Many schools now boast of having supplies to keep children at the school for 48 hours in the event of an “emergency” during which time the children will not be released to their parents.


And it gets even worse. In the name of predictive programming, do you recall a “drill” during which the police took over a school and practiced fighting “angry parents”?  I’ve been plenty annoyed at different schools my daughter has attended, but in no way have I been compelled to attack the school, requiring SWAT teams to defend it against me and my band of likewise irate moms.


In fact, there’s only one scenario I can imagine in which parents would storm the school to take back their children.  Mac Slavo of SHTFplan wrote about it:


Let’s consider the circumstances that would have to occur for not one, but two or more parents to lay armed siege to a school.


There’s only one real scenario that comes to mind, and you’d more than likely have to be a prepper or conspiracy theorist to even contemplate the possibility.


The schools which our kids attend have “shelter-in-place” emergency procedures that would be enacted in the event of an emergency such as a nuclear, chemical or biological attack. During these emergencies schools are to be locked down with no unofficial access into the buildings until the all-clear has been given. It’s unclear based on district procedures just what the shelter-in-place order means and what steps parents would need to take to get their kids out of school – or whether they could even take their kids out of school based on the emergency.


But basically, it boils down to this: If there is a widespread emergency, and a school locks down and refuses parental access to children, then and only then could we envision a scenario where parents might take it upon themselves to evacuate their children by force.


The ‘event’ in question would likely need to be mass scale, or perceived as mass scale, in order for a parent to be so adamant about getting their child out of the school that they would take to armed violence to get them out.


Is this what police are training for?


Someone, somewhere obviously thinks there is a legitimate reason for this type of training simulation. (source)



So when you put all of this together, it’s easy to see the future. The picture this is painting is that one day, a unilateral decision could be made to put our children on a bus, take them to an undisclosed location, and keep them. (Dave Hodges wrote a chilling article about the role of FEMA in these scenarios – you can read it HERE.)


Should you teach your child to escape?


Maybe it’s time to teach your child how to bug out from school.


By no means am I suggesting that this is a legitimate course of action for every child.  Some kids are too young or too prone to panic and poor judgement to safely bug out. Some environments are too dangerous for a young person to take off on his or her own.  Parents have to consider the skills and mindset of their kids before making plans like this. It can definitely be risky, and you have to compare it to the alternative of having your child herded along.


I have a huge amount of faith in my child. So much so that we have performed some of our own drills.  She attends a part-day advanced science program at a school 13 miles from our home.  She’s a lot more “aware” of events going on in the world than most of her peers because we discuss things like government encroachment and tyranny on a regular basis. She knows that she is not to get on a bus without my prior knowledge and consent.


If, out of the blue, the teachers just tell students to get on a bus, and there is no compelling reason for them to be doing so, it might be time for your child to use his or her own judgement on whether boarding that conveyance is actually a good idea.


If you feel that a school bug-out plan is a good idea for your child, here are a few things to consider:


  • If there are younger siblings at the school, your older children will need to plan how to connect with them, and whether or not to abort the bug-out if they can’t connect with the younger ones.

  • You need to set up a primary and secondary rally point where you’ll meet your kids.  This should be within a couple of miles of the school, and it should be a place where your children can stay hidden from the main road. The plan should always be to go to the primary rally point, but if for some reason that is unsafe or unaccessible, there should be a secondary rally point that is reached by a different route.

  • Figure out the route your child will take to get to the rally point.  Practice getting there from the school.  If possible, for reasons of safety and stealth, develop a route that does not use the main road to take them there. Hike or walk this route with your child until they are completely comfortable with it.

  • There are some situations in which evacuation is actually necessary. For example, some places are prone to forest fires and you wouldn’t want your child out on foot in such a scenario.  If the school building were to collapse, it’s obvious the children would be relocated to a safe shelter. This is the point at which your child’s judgement comes into play. It is vital to discuss different scenarios in which evacuation is necessary.

It is also important that your child have the proper gear to take off on foot, as well as the ability to use all of it.  It’s important to practice things like filtering water in order for a young person to feel confident doing so.


  • A hiking pack (My daughter keeps this  Signpost Outdoor Packable Handy Backpack Foldable Lightweight Travel Bag Daypack – Green in the bottom of her school bag)

  • Comfortable weather-appropriate footwear (winter boots, sneakers, etc.)

  • Water filtration bottle (we use THIS ONE from Berkey)

  • At least one full water bottle, but preferably two

  • Snacks like granola bars or energy bars (Clif Bars are made with good ingredients and are very filling)

  • Weather appropriate clothing (snow gear, light hoodie, gloves, hat for sun or warmth)

  • Fire-starting flint

  • Space blanket

  • First aid kit (band-aids are a must forpotential blisters)

  • Extra socks

Most of the other gear that you’d prefer your child to have is going to be deemed “dangerous” by the school.  Things like multi-tools, matches or lighters, or self-defense items are frowned upon and can result in anything from suspension by a “zero-tolerance” school system that seems unable to differentiate between a tool and a threat, to felony charges by the overzealous “justice system.” These are things you must take into consideration when choosing items for the emergency kit, and you have to weigh the pros against the cons.


Will this work for you?


This is not a plan that will work for every family. Only you can judge whether or not your child or teen can keep a cool enough head to execute a similar plan and use their own judgement in a surprise situation. Only you can assess the immediate environment and decide if it is safer for your student to set out on their own or to go with the staff from the school.


Do any of you have a simliar plan for your kids? Please share your suggestions in the comments below.


NOTE: This is not a debate about whether children should be educated at home or via the public school system. This is about a specific situation that affects many families in America who have made the decision to send their children to school based on their own personal circumstances or the availability of special programs.


About the author:


Please feel free to share any information from this site in part or in full, giving credit to the author and including a link to this website and the following bio.


Daisy Luther is a freelance writer and editor.  Her website, The Organic Prepper, offers information on healthy prepping, including premium nutritional choices, general wellness and non-tech solutions. You can follow Daisy on Facebook and Twitter, and you can email her at daisy@theorganicprepper.ca


If you enjoyed this article, please Vote for The Organic Prepper as a top prepping web site.

- See more at: http://www.theorganicprepper.ca/should-your-kids-know-how-to-bug-out-from-school-03162014#sthash.Uyp94vzS.dpuf






Should Your Kids Know How to Bug Out…from School?

Monday, March 10, 2014

Edward Snowden tells SXSW: Mass NSA spying ‘is something we have a right to know’

Edward Snowden tells SXSW: Mass NSA spying ‘is something we have a right to know’
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/A-recent-undated-picture-received-from-Channel-4-on-December-24-2013-shows-US-intelligence-leaker-Edward-Snowden-AFP.jpg


By Eric W. Dolan
Monday, March 10, 2014 15:47 EDT


A recent, undated picture received from Channel 4 on December 24, 2013 shows US intelligence leaker Edward Snowden (AFP)







  • Print Friendly and PDF

  • Email this page

  • Former intelligence contractor Edward Snowden said Monday he has no regrets over his leaks about mass surveillance programs, saying they sparked a needed public debate on spying and data collection.


    Snowden, who spoke via video link from Russia to the SXSW festival in Austin, Texas, said he revealed the programs of the US National Security Agency and other such services to foster “a better civic understanding” about what had been secret programs.


    He said his decision to leak documents to journalists “wasn’t so I could single handedly change the government; what I wanted to do was inform the public so they could provide their consent to what we should do.”


    Snowden, a former NSA contractor who has been in hiding in Russia and has been charged in the United States with espionage, maintained that “every society in the world has benefited” from the debate on surveillance.


    “Regardless of what happens to me, this is something we have a right to know,” he said on the link with members of the American Civil Liberties Union, who noted that the hookup was routed through seven proxy servers to keep his location secure.


    Snowden, who appeared against a backdrop of a giant copy of the US constitution, said the NSA programs have fundamentally altered the rights outlined in the charter.


    “The interpretation of the constitution has been changed from ‘no unreasonable searches and seizures,’ to ‘any seizure is fine, just don’t search it,’” he said.


    Snowden said he chose to speak to SXSW because he believes it is important to encourage technology companies to make changes to stem mass surveillance.


    “The people who are in the room in Austin right now, they are the folks who can really fix things through technical standards,” he said.


    Snowden said more companies should adopt robust encryption that is built into communications without users having to use complex technical tools.


    He maintained that if encryption is too complex, “people aren’t going to use it; it has to happen automatically, it has to happen seamlessly.”


    If online communications are fully encrypted at all stages, Snowden said, bulk data collection would become too difficult for intelligence agencies.


    He also said the NSA and other agencies have devoted too many resources to this type of bulk collection and not enough to traditional methods to catch criminals and terrorists.


    “We’ve had tremendous intelligence failures because we are monitoring everybody’s communications, instead of suspects,” he said.


    He cited the Boston marathon bombings as an example, saying “if we hadn’t spent so much on mass surveillance, if we followed traditional models, we might have caught” the suspects.


    - Congress needs watchdog -


    One of the questions came via Twitter from Tim Berners-Lee, creator of the World Wide Web, who thanked Snowden and asked how to make an intelligence oversight system more accountable.


    Snowden said “the key factor is accountability” and that Congress needed a watchdog because it failed to adequately oversee the NSA.


    “We can’t have officials who can lie to the Congress and not face any consequences,” he said. “We need a watchdog that watches Congress.”


    Documents leaked by Snowden in 2013 revealed widespread surveillance of individuals and institutions in the United States and around the world.


    He received temporary asylum in Russia in August — a move that infuriated the United States and was a key factor behind President Barack Obama’s decision to cancel a summit with counterpart Vladimir Putin last year.



    Eric W. Dolan


    Eric W. Dolan


    Eric W. Dolan has served as an editor for Raw Story since August 2010, and is based out of Sacramento, California. He grew up in the suburbs of Chicago and received a Bachelor of Science from Bradley University. Eric is also the publisher and editor of PsyPost. You can follow him on Twitter @ewdolan.




    The Raw Story




    Read more about Edward Snowden tells SXSW: Mass NSA spying ‘is something we have a right to know’ and other interesting subjects concerning Commentary at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

25 Extremely Disturbing Facts You Wish You Didn’t Know




Published on Oct 31, 2013 – by list25



Tweet this video! - http://clicktotweet.com/faKHc


You’ve been warned. Reading or watching this list will probably change the way you act, eat, sleep, and view Koala bears. These are 25 extremely disturbing facts you wish you didn’t know.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkugC1HPjhs




This entry was posted in Videos. Bookmark the permalink.

156





25 Extremely Disturbing Facts You Wish You Didn’t Know

Saturday, February 1, 2014

9 Animals That May Or May Not Know The Super Bowl 48 Winner

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


9 Animals That May Or May Not Know The Super Bowl 48 Winner

Monday, January 20, 2014

OLYMPIC GAMES: What You Need to Know About Sochi 2014

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


OLYMPIC GAMES: What You Need to Know About Sochi 2014

Sunday, January 19, 2014

WaPo"s Nia-Malika Henderson: Clinton"s "Biggest Accomplishment" As Sec. Of State? We Don"t Really Know


NIA-MALIKA HENDERSON: I mean, you have this report that comes out. It mentions her once. In some ways, it didn’t sort of corroborate the main charge that Republicans had been making, which is that there was a cover-up. I think the discussion of Benghazi, and we heard it in 2012 as well, so far, it’s been sort of a boutique issue among Republicans.


It hasn’t yet been, I think, embraced in the same way by the general public. I think it does get to what Hillary Clinton actually did as Secretary of State, right. Does she have a sort of counter narrative? You know, what’s her biggest accomplishment as Secretary of State? We don’t really know that. And at this point, Benghazi is standing in for her term as Secretary of State.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



WaPo"s Nia-Malika Henderson: Clinton"s "Biggest Accomplishment" As Sec. Of State? We Don"t Really Know

They Know Their Target Demographic

At Hey WTF? News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Hey WTF? News and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, Hey WTF? News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

Hey WTF? News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Hey WTF? News.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Hey WTF? News and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Hey WTF? News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

Hey WTF? News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Hey WTF? News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


They Know Their Target Demographic

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

What Most People Think They Know About Marijuana Is Unscientific, Paranoid and Even Racist Propaganda



Don"t believe the marijuana hype.








This article first appeared at The Fix, with coverage on addiction and recovery, straight up. 


Everyone thinks they know something about drugs—whether from personal experience or from 8th grade prevention classes or simply because the media presents so many stories about them. Unfortunately, most of what people think they know is inaccurate, and comes from years of government war-on-drugs propaganda, with little understanding of itsmedical and historical context.


Take some of the recent absurd anti-marijuana columns and tweets from some of the backbones of the media establishment: the New York Times’ David Brooks, Ruth Marcus of the Washington Post and Tina Brown, former New Yorker editor and founder of the Daily Beast.  


Both Brooks and Marcus told stories of their own youthful pot smoking—neither of which seems to have led to any lasting negative consequences as is the case for the overwhelming majority of marijuana users. Yet both claimed—without apparently understanding that relying on a single study that has been questioned in a follow up by the same journal is not accurately reporting “fact”—that marijuana definitively lowers IQ.  


And neither mentioned the elephant in the room: the fact that marijuana laws are mainly enforced against black people and that arresting millions and saddling them with criminal records hasn’t prevented around half of the adult population (white and black) from trying weed. It has, however, meant that black people have reduced opportunities to get jobs with organizations like the Times or the Post while Brooks and Marcus never faced arrest.


Conveniently, the columnists also left out the fact that countries like Portugal that have decriminalized marijuana (or countries like Holland that tolerate some commercial sales of marijuana) actually havelower rates of youth drug use than we do.


Meanwhile, Tina Brown also tweeted that marijuana makes people stupid and legalization will reduce our ability to compete with China. Suffice it to say that she has little evidence for such a claim—one might argue based on equally flimsy data that it enhances creativity and popular culture, which is one of our true strengths—but that wouldn’t sound appropriately “serious.”


And right there is the problem: columnists and journalists who write about drugs rarely question conventional wisdom or go beyond cherry-picking of data to support what they already “know.”


But why are we so gullible in this area, when reporters are supposed to be skeptical? One reason has got to be the fact that over the last 40 years, the government has spent billions of dollars on advertising and even planted media articles and messages in TV shows aiming to get us all to “just say no.” While these campaigns are often ineffective at preventing use, they do seem to work at clouding perception.


And the truth is seen as immaterial in the drug war. Written into the job description of the “drug czar” by Congress is that whoever heads the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) must “take such actions as necessary to oppose any attempt to legalize the use of a substance (in any form)” that is currently illegal, regardless of the facts. When asked about its distribution of “misleading information”—by a Congressman, in fact—ONDCP cited this provision to justify doing so, saying that this is “within the statutory role assigned to ONDCP.” In other words, they have to lie.


Rare is the journalist who will admit to having fallen for this outright propaganda, which is why last year’s confession by CNN’s chief medical correspondent Dr. Sanjay Gupta that he was wrong about marijuana was so stunning.


On CNN’s website, he wrote:


I mistakenly believed the Drug Enforcement Agency listed marijuana as a schedule 1 substance because of sound scientific proof. Surely, they must have quality reasoning as to why marijuana is in the category of the most dangerous drugs that have “no accepted medicinal use and a high potential for abuse.”


They didn"t have the science to support that claim, and I now know that when it comes to marijuana neither of those things are true. It doesn"t have a high potential for abuse, and there are very legitimate medical applications.


The truth is that our perceptions of marijuana—and in fact all of our drug laws—are based on early 20th century racism and “science” circa the Jim Crow era. In the early decades of the 20th century, the drug was linked to Mexican immigrants and black jazzmen, who were seen as potentially dangerous.


Harry Anslinger, the first commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (an early predecessor of the DEA), was one of the driving forces behind pot prohibition. He pushed it for explicitly racist reasons, saying, “Reefer makes darkies think they"re as good as white men,” and: 


“There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the U.S., and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing result from marijuana use. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.”


The main reason to prohibit marijuana, he said was “its effect on the degenerate races.” (And god forbid women should sleep with entertainers!)


Although it sounds absurd now, it was this type of propaganda that caused the drug to be outlawed in 1937—along with support from the Hearst newspapers, which ran ads calling marijuana “the assassin of youth” and published stories about how it led to violence and insanity. Anslinger remained as head of federal narcotics efforts as late as 1962, whereafter he spread his poisonous message to the world as the American representative to the U.N. for drug policy for a further two years.


Before marijuana was made illegal, the American Medical Association’s opposition to prohibition was ignored, as was an earlier report on marijuana in India by the British government, which did not find marijuana to be particularly addictive or dangerous. That “Indian Hemp Drugs Committee” reporthad concluded way back in 1894 that, “The moderate use of hemp drugs is practically attended by no evil results at all.”  


Pundits and columnists who make pronouncements about marijuana’s dangers seem willfully ignorant of this history, which is easy to check via any online search engine. Its seems unlikely that Brooks, Marcus and Brown would want their names associated with a law that is both explicitly racist in intent—and continuingly racist in outcome.


But until we treat drug issues as medical and scientific questions, we will be doomed to continue this bigoted legacy—and we will not be able to treat addiction as the health issue that it is.


So, just say know when it comes to drugs—and be sure what you know is based in science, not ancient biased nonsense. (Though, on second thought, Anslinger may have had a point about the inadvisability of sexual relations with entertainers, particularly musicians.)


For a weekly roundup of news and developments in the drug reform movement and the injustices stemming from prohibition,  sign up to receive  AlterNet"s Drugs Newsletter here. Make sure to scroll down to “Drugs” and subscribe. Also, please check out the new AlterNet Drugs page on Facebook. Thanks for reading!





Maia Szalavitz is a columnist at The Fix. She is also a health reporter at Time magazine online, and co-author, with Bruce Perry, of Born for Love: Why Empathy Is Essential—and Endangered (Morrow, 2010), and author of Help at Any Cost: How the Troubled-Teen Industry Cons Parents and Hurts Kids (Riverhead, 2006). 





 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



What Most People Think They Know About Marijuana Is Unscientific, Paranoid and Even Racist Propaganda

Friday, December 27, 2013

10 Things You Didn"t Know About AllTime10s

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



10 Things You Didn"t Know About AllTime10s

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

6 Things You Need To Know About The White House Panel’s NSA Recommendations

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


6 Things You Need To Know About The White House Panel’s NSA Recommendations

Monday, December 16, 2013

What You Don"t Know About The NSA Spying Program - MOC #242 by @LeeCamp

What You Don"t Know About The NSA Spying Program - MOC #242 by @LeeCamp
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/K_hB4FhrgOg/mqdefault.jpg


What You Don

This is the perfect video for anyone who thinks they’re behind the NSA spying program. Give it a chance. This video is for Obama LOVERS and HATERS. 1) This v…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about What You Don"t Know About The NSA Spying Program - MOC #242 by @LeeCamp and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

What You Don"t Know About The NSA Spying Program - MOC #242 by @LeeCamp

What You Don"t Know About The NSA Spying Program - MOC #242 by @LeeCamp
http://img.youtube.com/vi/K_hB4FhrgOg/0.jpg


This is the perfect video for anyone who thinks they’re behind the NSA spying program. Give it a chance. This video is for Obama LOVERS and HATERS. 1) This v…
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about What You Don"t Know About The NSA Spying Program - MOC #242 by @LeeCamp and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, December 13, 2013

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/mqdefault.jpg


Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/mqdefault.jpg


Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://img.youtube.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/0.jpg


Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank
http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nsvdcMBUT0Q/mqdefault.jpg


Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank

Abby Martin speaks with whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Jesselyn Radack their visit with NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden in Russia, where they awarded him …
Video Rating: 4 / 5




Read more about Getting to Know NSA Whistleblower Edward Snowden | Think Tank and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com