Showing posts with label hear. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hear. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Split federal appeals judges hear arguments on Obamacare subsidies

President Barack Obama delivers a statement announcing the nomination of three candidates for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in the Rose Garden of the White House, June 4, 2013. Nominees from left are: Robert Leon Wilkins,
Be very glad for filibuster reform and that these judges were confirmed.


Back in January, Judge Paul L. Friedman of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed one of the more frivolous challenges to the Affordable Care Act, one that said a plain reading of the law says that subsidies should only be available to people who are getting insurance on the state exchanges, not in the federal exchanges—which have been established for nearly three dozen states. Judge Friedman pointed out that the interpretation of the law central to the challenge “runs counter to this central purpose of the ACA: to provide affordable health care to virtually all Americans,” and “would violate the basic rule of statutory construction that a court must interpret a statute in light of its history and purpose.”

Clearly, the intent of the full legislation was, and is, to provide affordable health insurance to everyone, no matter what state they lived in. But it turns out, on appeal, that that intent isn’t clear to two Republican-appointed judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, who were part of a three-judge panel that heard the appeal.


One member of the appeals court panel, Harry T. Edwards, a senior circuit judge, agreed with [the government"s] argument. Judge Edwards said “it seems preposterous” to suggest that subsidies should not be available in the federal exchange, which serves states with about two-thirds of the nation’s population.

That interpretation of the law he said, would “gut the statute.”


Another member of the panel, Judge Thomas B. Griffith, asked questions indicating that he was skeptical of the Obama administration’s argument. And the third member of the panel, A. Raymond Randolph, a senior circuit judge, sounded downright hostile to the government’s case.



Democratic congressional leadership, and the authors of the law, filed briefs with the court describing the intent of the law, but apparently to no avail with the conservative judges. Should this three-judge panel rule against the government, the good news is that the matter would certainly be taken up en banc, before the full court. The other good news is that filibuster reform restored balance to the court, with the approval of Obama nominees Patricia Ann Millett, Nina Pillard and Robert L. Wilkins. Even so, with the caliber of Obamacare challenge that meets muster with the Supreme Court, this ridiculous case could end up there.



Daily Kos



Split federal appeals judges hear arguments on Obamacare subsidies

Monday, February 24, 2014

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Second Amendment Cases


Cases concern the right to carry concealed handguns outside the home


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
February 24, 2014


shallnotbeinfringed


Three cases involving Second Amendment issues were turned away from the Supreme Court on Monday. The cases concerned the right of Americans to carry firearms outside their homes for self-defense.


The Court did not comment on petitions for certiorari for NRA v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, NRA v. McCraw and Lane v. Holder.


Constitution Daily reports the cases were considered on Friday in private conference.


A fourth case, however, may ultimately be considered by the Court and settle the matter. Drake v. Jerejian addresses gun control in New Jersey. The case argues that the Second Amendment permits a resident of the state to carry a firearm outside the home without providing justification to the state. A number of amici curiae briefs were filed with the Court on February 12.


The Court is set to respond by March 14, according to the SCOTUSBlog.


The Court has not ruled on the Second Amendment since 2010 when it issued a decision on McDonald v. City of Chicago. The case added to the 2008 Heller decision. Heller held in a 5-4 decision the Second Amendment applies to the District of Columbia and protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm for self-defense. It struck down a DC law outlawing the possession of handguns in the home.


The decision follows a ruling issued last week by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that overturned a prohibition on carrying concealed handguns. The Court ruled that carrying a handgun “outside the home for the lawful purpose of self-defense, though subject to traditional restrictions, constitutes ‘bear[ing] Arms’ within the meaning of the Second Amendment.”


Rulings on carrying firearms outside of the home have been mixed. The 7th Circuit concurred with the 9th Circuit that carrying a gun in public is covered under the Second Amendment. Other courts, however, including the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Circuits, have issued less definitive opinions.


Earlier this month, the 9th Circuit struck down a California law restricting the carrying of a concealed weapon in the state. A majority ruled that restriction on carrying firearms in Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego and San Francisco violate the Second Amendment.


This article was posted: Monday, February 24, 2014 at 10:48 am









Infowars



Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Second Amendment Cases

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Democratic Mayor, Eyewitness To Alleged Chris Christie Strongarming: Nope, Didn’t Hear It


HotAir.com:

As Ed wrote this morning and Guy Benson has covered exhaustively all weekend, the allegations mounted by Hoboken Mayor Dawn Zimmer on MSNBC now amount to several diary entries and a bunch of holes.

First, the central question. Did Hoboken get fewer Sandy funds than it needed or deserved? Are there actual damages to which one might tie this alleged political corruption? The original MSNBC report played fast and loose with the numbers to leave that impression, but the reality is Hoboken got millions in relief funds, but perhaps not in the exact amounts Zimmer was requesting. Guy Benson:

The original MSNBC story leaves the distinct impression that the city received less than $ 350,000 in aid out of a $ 127 million request. In fact, Christie’s office points out, Hoboken has benefited from nearly $ 70 million in federal and state recovery and relief funding — which they say is commensurate with aid received by similarly situated municipalities. They emphasize that not a single grant application from Hoboken was denied.


MSNBC’s report, Christie aides say, conflated total aid with the much narrower issue of “hazard mitigation” funds. They concede that Zimmer did, in fact, request more than $ 100 million in hazard mitigation assistance — which at the time accounted for more than one-third of the entire available budget allocated for that purpose.

Her story has changed. First, it was that Christie withheld Sandy funds because she didn’t endorse him, according to this New Jersey reporter:

Matt Katz @mattkatz00





8 days ago Hoboken Mayor told @WNYC & @GonzalezSarahA her loss of Sandy aid was tied to failure to endorse @GovChristie. Now different story










Politik Ditto



Democratic Mayor, Eyewitness To Alleged Chris Christie Strongarming: Nope, Didn’t Hear It

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Krauthammer On PBS: To Hear Truth About Obamacare, "Try FOX"





GORDON PETERSON: [Paul] Ryan’s response was this, ‘Look, you want to get things done, you have to be willing to be criticized by everybody. Republicans don’t run everything. You have to find a way to work with the other side of the aisle to make the government work.’ Apparently there are people in Washington who find that kind of reasoning toxic, Charles.


CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER: Let me start with an editorial note. I love how you guys just can’t wait to get your teeth into Republicans throwing mud at Republicans on a week when this administration — by the way, the viewers, you’re not going to hear a word about a week in which the Secretary of HHS unilaterally — lawlessly — changed every deadline in the Obamacare law without any legal authority, in a way that is absolutely astonishing. But you won’t hear about this on this show, so try FOX. (Inside Washington, December 14, 2013)




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Krauthammer On PBS: To Hear Truth About Obamacare, "Try FOX"

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Supreme Court will hear Obamacare contraception challenges

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia speaks at a Reuters Newsmaker event in New York September 17, 2012. Scalia on Monday escalated a war of words with a prominent appeals court judge, saying the judge lied in a recent criticism of Scalia
Now he’ll decide if your employer can deny your birth control.


The Supreme Court has decided to take up a challenge to the contraception coverage mandate in the Affordable Care Act. At stake in the case is the further definition of the rights of a corporation as a person, specifically, could it claim a religious conscience that could be “substantially burdened by government action” under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

One of the cases was filed by arts and crafts retailer Hobby Lobby Stores Inc and Mardel, a chain of Christian bookstores. Both are owned and operated by David and Barbara Green and their children, who are evangelical Christians. The administration of President Barack Obama sought the high court’s review in that case after losing before a federal appeals court.

The other case was brought by a Mennonite family that owns a company in Pennsylvania, Conestoga Wood Specialties. The company, which lost in federal appeals court, is owned and operated by Norman and Elizabeth Hahn and their three sons. [...]


The cases are not a direct challenge to the mandate itself. The question is whether closely held companies owned by individuals who object to the provision on religious grounds can be exempted from the requirement.



Now that the Supreme Court has determined that corporations have the same free speech rights as people, it will determine if corporations also have religious consciences, and can impose those beliefs on employees’ health care options. Citizens United was the cornerstone to the decision in favor of Hobby Lobby by the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. The Court said it had applied “the First Amendment logic of Citizens United” in ruling for the corporation.

9:46 AM PT: The White House issued this statement (excerpt):


The health care law puts women and families in control of their health care by covering vital preventive care, like cancer screenings and birth control, free of charge.  Earlier this year, the Obama Administration asked the Supreme Court to consider a legal challenge to the health care law’s requirement that for-profit corporations include birth control coverage in insurance available to their employees.  We believe this requirement is lawful and essential to women’s health and are confident the Supreme Court will agree.




Daily Kos



Supreme Court will hear Obamacare contraception challenges

UPDATE 1-U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Obamacare contraception cases

UPDATE 1-U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Obamacare contraception cases
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/28790__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif




Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:18pm EST



(Adds details of the cases)


By Lawrence Hurley


WASHINGTON Nov 26 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on Tuesday to consider religious objections made by corporations to a provision of Obamacare requiring employers to provide health insurance that covers birth control.


Oral arguments will likely be scheduled for March, with a ruling due by June.


The so-called contraception mandate of the 2010 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, requires employers to provide health insurance policies that include preventive services for women that include access to contraception and sterilization.


The key question before the court in the two cases it agreed to hear is whether corporations should be treated the same as individuals when making free exercise of religion claims under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and a 1993 federal law called the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.


One of the cases was filed by arts and crafts retailer Hobby Lobby Stores Inc and Mardel, a chain of Christian bookstores. Both are owned and operated by David and Barbara Green and their children, who are evangelical Christians. The administration of President Barack Obama sought the high court’s review in that case after losing before a federal appeals court.


The other case was brought by a Mennonite family that owns a company in Pennsylvania, Conestoga Wood Specialties. The company, which lost in federal appeals court, is owned and operated by Norman and Elizabeth Hahn and their three sons.


The court took no action on a third case filed by Michigan companies Autocam Corp and Autocam Medical LLC.


The cases are not a direct challenge to the mandate itself. The question is whether closely held companies owned by individuals who object to the provision on religious grounds can be exempted from the requirement.


The legal questions surrounding U.S. Health and Human Services regulations issued under the preventive health provisions of the Obamacare law have not previously been before the court. In June 2012, the justices upheld the constitutionality of the law’s core feature that requires people to get health insurance on a 5-4 vote.


The cases are Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood v. Sebelius, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 13-354, 13-356. (Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Howard Goller and Vicki Allen)






Reuters: Financial Services and Real Estate




Read more about UPDATE 1-U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Obamacare contraception cases and other interesting subjects concerning Real Estate at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, November 15, 2013

U.S. justices agree to hear Halliburton securities class action

U.S. justices agree to hear Halliburton securities class action
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ebbe9__?m=02&d=20131115&t=2&i=812193004&w=460&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=CBRE9AE1FI200.jpg




WASHINGTON Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:32pm EST






Read more about U.S. justices agree to hear Halliburton securities class action and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, September 27, 2013

Hear a Song from the New Breaking Bad Original Score


Past Tracks


Sunday’s series finale of Breaking Bad marks the conclusion of television’s favorite anti-hero saga, but it also means the end of its tense, moody score, which has been a fitting soundtrack to White’s descent into crime over the past five seasons. Dave Porter, the series’ composer, has scored all 62 episodes of the acclaimed AMC series, and his work is now getting an official release for the second time


Breaking Bad: Original Score From The Television Series Volume 2, available now, features music from the show that wasn’t included on the first original score, released last summer. Viewers first heard the above track, “White House Visit,” from a flash-forward in season five’s “Blood Money” episode, which Porter said was one of the hardest scenes in the series to score.


new track button.png




    








Master Feed : The Atlantic



Hear a Song from the New Breaking Bad Original Score

Sunday, August 25, 2013

Egypt courts hear cases against Mubarak, Islamists








Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, 85, is escorted by medical and security personnel into an ambulance to be taken by helicopter ambulance from Maadi Military Hospital to the Cairo Police Academy–turned–court, Cairo, Egypt, Sunday, Aug. 25, 2013. Mubarak, under house arrest after being released from detention last week, is standing retrial in charges of complicity in the killings of protesters during 2011 Egyptian uprising. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)





Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, 85, is escorted by medical and security personnel into an ambulance to be taken by helicopter ambulance from Maadi Military Hospital to the Cairo Police Academy–turned–court, Cairo, Egypt, Sunday, Aug. 25, 2013. Mubarak, under house arrest after being released from detention last week, is standing retrial in charges of complicity in the killings of protesters during 2011 Egyptian uprising. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)





Former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, 85, is escorted by medical and security personnel into an ambulance to be taken by helicopter ambulance from Maadi Military Hospital to the Cairo Police Academy–turned–court, Cairo, Egypt, Sunday, Aug. 25, 2013. Mubarak, under house arrest after being released from detention last week, is standing retrial in charges of complicity in the killings of protesters during 2011 Egyptian uprising. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — In parallel trial sessions, Egyptian courts heard cases Sunday against ousted President Hosni Mubarak and top leaders of his archrival, the Muslim Brotherhood, related to killings during the 2011 and 2013 protest campaigns that led to their respective downfalls.


The court trying Brotherhood leader Mohammed Badie and five other members of the Islamist group postponed hearings until October 29. The defendants, two of whom are still in hiding and being tried in absentia, are accused in relation to clashes outside the Brotherhood’s Cairo headquarters on June 30 that left nine dead.


The four in detention were not present in the downtown Cairo courtroom for security reasons. They were arrested over the last month as part of a massive crackdown on the Brotherhood following the ouster of President Mohammed Morsi, who hails from the group, and related violence.


At another courtroom in eastern Cairo, Mubarak looked relaxed in dark sunglasses and a white jumpsuit in his first court appearance since he was released from prison last week and transferred to a military hospital. The 85-year-old ex-president, whose lawyer has claimed has been on the verge of death, sat in a wheelchair next to his two sons who are being tried in a separate corruption-related case.


Mubarak has been in detention since April 2011, two months after he was ousted in an uprising against his rule. He was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison last year for failing to stop the killing of some 900 protesters in the 18-day uprising, but his sentence was overturned on appeal. In April, his retrial opened along with those of his security chief and six top police commanders.


The six Brotherhood members, including Badie and his deputies Khairat el-Shater and Rashad Bayoumi, are charged with instigating the killings of nine protesters on June 30, when millions took to the streets demanding the ouster of Morsi.


The killings took place near the Brotherhood’s east Cairo headquarters, which was attacked by an allegedly anti-Morsi crowd. Dozens of Brotherhood members were trapped inside the building for hours and it was eventually set on fire. The group said the police encouraged “thugs” to attack the building while security officials at the time said that the group placed snipers atop the building.


The military toppled Morsi three days later, then launched a massive crackdown on the Islamist movement, arresting top leaders including el-Shater and Bayoumi, rounding up field organizers and shutting down Islamic TV networks.


On Aug. 14, riot police backed by armored vehicles and bulldozers moved to clear two sprawling encampments of Morsi’s supporters, sparking violence that left more than 1000 people dead across the country. The interim presidency declared a monthlong state of emergency. Badie and hundreds others were arrested in the aftermath.


The military-backed interim government meanwhile is pursuing a fast-tract transition plan that it says will return the country to democracy.


On Sunday, a 10-member panel of experts is due to hand a first draft of constitutional amendments to the interim presidency, a first step toward amending the charter drafted last year under Morsi, now suspended. A second panel of 50 members will work on the amendments before finalizing them and putting them for public vote.


Once the constitution is adopted, the plan envisions presidential and parliamentary elections held by early next year.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Egypt courts hear cases against Mubarak, Islamists

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Catholics hear pope"s call to shake up church














A woman watches a Stations of the Cross performance, on the Copacabana beachfront in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Friday, July 26, 2013. Pope Francis presided over one of the most solemn rites of the Catholic Church on Friday, a procession re-enacting Christ’s crucifixion, that received a Broadway-like treatment; staging a wildly theatrical telling of the Stations of the Cross, complete with huge stage sets, complex lighting, a full orchestra and a cast of hundreds acting out a modern version of the biblical story. (AP Photo/Andre Penner)






(AP) — In the thick of his historic visit to Brazil this week, Pope Francis urged young Catholics to make a “mess” in their dioceses and break out of their spiritual cages.


Francis’ exhortation, spoken Thursday during a special meeting with Argentine faithful, won him acclaim as a renegade leader of the world’s biggest church. But it also left many of his followers with their own interpretations of the pontiff’s words about the need to shake up the church.


Some said they thought Francis wanted them to object more forcefully when taught modern ideas that clash with church doctrine. Others said it meant hitting the streets and pushing for social change.


“If in my biology class they speak about abortion, I should raise my hand and say I don’t believe in that,” said Maria Alejandrina de Dicindio, a 54-year-old Argentine catechism teacher who had traveled to Rio to see her pope, a fellow Argentine. “The youth should open their mouths when it’s their turn.”


For Mexican pilgrim Gilberto Amado Hernandez, the pope’s message meant he should start showing off to the world Jesus Christ’s message of love.


“It’s difficult to meet young people who want to get close to Christ,” Amado said. “We have to show them that faith is something beautiful.”


Francis himself didn’t specify what to do, but he has displayed his own mold-breaking ways throughout this week’s visit to Rio de Janeiro and rural Sao Paulo state, his first overseas trip as pope.


The first pontiff from the Americas worried security officials by riding through massive crowds atop an open-sided popemobile rather than the fully enclosed, bulletproof vehicle his last two predecessors used. He’s also ventured straight up to well-wishers to kiss babies and bless children and met privately Friday with juvenile offenders to provide counsel.


While speaking to his fellow Argentines Thursday, Francis said Catholics should make a concerted effort to get outside their own worlds.


“I want to see the church get closer to the people,” he told them. “I want to get rid of clericalism, the mundane, this closing ourselves off within ourselves, in our parishes, schools or structures, because these need to get out.”


His final message: “Don’t forget: make trouble.”


In his own way, he lived those words as the archbishop of Buenos Aires, Argentina, before being selected as pope in March.


Then known as Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the future pope largely abandoned the kinds of luxuries favored by other high-ranking church officials. He rented out the archbishop’s luxurious suburban mansion, living instead in a spartan room in a downtown church office building. He also rode subways and buses around town rather than keep a chauffeur.


Francis’ visit to a Rio slum on Thursday wasn’t his first such venture. He made regular unescorted trips to dangerous slums as archbishop and saw to it that every major “misery village” in Buenos Aires had a chapel and a priest to spread the Lord’s word.


He also encouraged young people and the laity to take on leadership roles in parishes that were previously held by priests, so that church members would have much more say in what happens in their communities. Though the Catholic Church openly supported Argentina’s 1976-1983 dictatorship, Francis later approved sainthood investigations for priests who were killed by the military government.


Yet pope biographer Sergio Rubin said Francis the archbishop also had a very keen sense of politics and took care to act prudently, choosing his battles and avoiding challenging superiors in ways that would backfire.


He wasn’t so gleeful and devoted to the crowd, seemingly mindful that he didn’t yet have the power to make a big splash in the church, according to an Argentine Catholic official who asked not to be identified because he wasn’t authorized to talk publicly about church politics.


Instead, Francis molded the church in Argentina in quieter ways by hiring and promoting a new generation of outgoing priests in his own model, and not only fellow Jesuits used to living among lay people.


His replacement as archbishop, Mario Poli, had impressed Bergoglio by earning a degree in social work from the public University of Buenos Aires. In a book of dialogues with a friendly rabbi, Francis said, “This is a much better situation, because in the (university) you become acquainted with real life, the different points of view there are about it, the different scientific aspects, cosmopolitanism. . It’s a way of having your feet well planted in the earth.”


The shake-up message is also one he’s applying as pope to the Vatican’s staid and dysfunctional bureaucracy. Francis has made clear that big change is on the way, naming commissions of inquiry to investigate the scandals at the Vatican bank and propose an overarching reform of the entire central governance of the Catholic Church.


The pontiff has dived into the crowds that have greeted him at the Vatican and in Brazil.


During two raucous rides down Copacabana beach, he’s waved, smiled and stopped repeatedly to accept gifts thrown at him from the crowd. At one point, Francis gave away his own white skullcap and put on another one tossed in from the street.


For Argentine student Ana Paula Garrote, Francis was showing Catholics they needed to live that type of spirit.


“For me, the pope wanted to say that we should go out into the streets, not stay in the parishes, and not be ashamed of talking about God,” Garrote said. “The pope is telling us to talk about God without impunity because we have the truth, in uppercase, and we aren’t alone.”


___


Associated Press writer Marco Sibaja contributed to this report from Rio de Janeiro.


Associated Press



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Affiliate software for Amazon Store websites | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

Top Headlines

Catholics hear pope"s call to shake up church