Showing posts with label Parts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parts. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Ice storm encases parts of the South








Ice hangs from foliage on a residential street on Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, in Atlanta. Across the South, winter-weary residents woke up Wednesday to a region encased in ice, snow and freezing rain, with forecasters warning that the worst of the potentially “catastrophic” storm is yet to come. From Texas to the Carolinas and the South’s business hub in Atlanta, roads were slick with ice, tens of thousands were without power, and a wintry mix fell in many areas. (AP Photo/David Tulis)





Ice hangs from foliage on a residential street on Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, in Atlanta. Across the South, winter-weary residents woke up Wednesday to a region encased in ice, snow and freezing rain, with forecasters warning that the worst of the potentially “catastrophic” storm is yet to come. From Texas to the Carolinas and the South’s business hub in Atlanta, roads were slick with ice, tens of thousands were without power, and a wintry mix fell in many areas. (AP Photo/David Tulis)





Ice and snow cover Interstate 26, early Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, in Columbia, S.C. Gov. Nikki Haley again declared a state of emergency as emergency officials worried that as much as an inch of ice accumulating on trees and power lines Wednesday into Thursday could knock out powers to thousands, especially in the Midlands. (AP Photo/Mary Ann Chastain)





Shmetrice Moore, a nurse at an Emory hospital, scrapes snow and ice off her windshield as she and others are released early from their shift before a winter storm on Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, in Johns Creek, Ga. From Texas to the Carolinas and the South’s business hub in Atlanta, roads were slick with ice, tens of thousands were without power, and a wintry mix fell in many areas. (AP Photo/John Amis)





Rosemary Bennett walks home Tuesday evening February 11, 2014 after a visit to a local store in Greenville MS. Bennett says she was enjoying the rare snow and planned on making a snow angle once she arrived home. (AP Photo/The Delta Democrat-Times, Bill Johnson)





Motorists drive on a road covered in snow and ice on Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, in Johns Creek, Ga. Across the South, winter-weary residents woke up Wednesday to a region encased in ice, snow and freezing rain, with forecasters warning that the worst of the potentially “catastrophic” storm is yet to come. From Texas to the Carolinas and the South’s business hub in Atlanta, roads were slick with ice, tens of thousands were without power, and a wintry mix fell in many areas. (AP Photo/John Amis)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — An ice storm gripped the winter-weary South on Wednesday, knocking out power to a wide swath of the region as the outages nearly doubled by the hour, and forecasters warned the worst of the potentially “catastrophic” storm was yet to come.


From Texas to the Carolinas and the South’s business hub in Atlanta, roads were slick, businesses and schools were closed and people hunkered down. Just hours into it, sleet, snow and freezing rain had encased trees, sending them crashing into power lines. More than 200,000 homes and businesses across the region were without power and the number steadily increased. The storm came in waves of snow, sleet and freezing rain and forecasters warned relief with warmer temperatures wasn’t expected until Thursday at the earliest.


Officials and forecasters in several states used unusually dire language in warnings, and they agreed that the biggest concern was ice, which could knock out power for days. Winds, with gusts up to 30 mph in parts of Georgia, exacerbated problems.


In Atlanta, where a storm took the metro region by surprise and stranded thousands in vehicles just two weeks ago, tens of thousands of customers were reported without power. City roads and interstates were largely desolate.


The few that ventured out walked to the pharmacy, rode the train or walked their dogs.


“Even in the snow, you still have to do your business,” said Matt Altmix, who took out his Great Dane, Stella. “After the first snow, we kind of got our snow excitement out of the way. But now it’s more the drudgery of pushing on.”


Stinging drops of sleet fell and a layer of ice crusted car windshields. Slushy sidewalks made even short walking trips treacherous. One emergency crew had to pull over to wait out the falling snow before slowly making its way back to the Georgia Emergency Management Agency’s special operations center.


The combination of sleet, snow and freezing rain was expected to coat power lines and tree branches with more than an inch of ice between Atlanta and Augusta. Other areas would see less than an inch.


In normally busy downtown areas, almost every business was closed, except for a CVS pharmacy.


Amy Cuzzort, who spent six hours in her car during the traffic standstill of January’s storm, said she’d spend this one at home, “doing chores, watching movies — creepy movies, ‘The Shining,’” referring to the film about a writer who goes mad while trapped in a hotel during a snowstorm.


In Decatur, just outside Atlanta, Georgia State University student Matt Stanhope, 23, ventured outside to go to a pharmacy but then planned to stay home.


“Everything is just on pause,” he said, gazing at vacant streets.


Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, sounding a far more upbeat tone than two weeks ago, warned people not to become complacent as the storm came in waves.


“Thanks to the people of Georgia. You have shown your character,” he said. During the last storm, Deal was widely criticized for being unprepared and the state became the butt of late-night jokes.


In an early Wednesday warning, the National Weather Service called the storm “catastrophic … crippling … paralyzing … choose your adjective.”


The forecast drew comparisons to an ice storm in the Atlanta area in 2000 that left more than 500,000 homes and businesses without power and an epic storm in 1973 that caused an estimated 200,000 outages for several days. In 2000, damage estimates topped $ 35 million.


Eli Jacks, a meteorologist with National Weather Service, said forecasters use words such as “catastrophic” sparingly.


“Sometimes we want to tell them, ‘Hey, listen, this warning is different. This is really extremely dangerous, and it doesn’t happen very often,’” Jacks said.


He noted that three-quarters of an inch of ice would be catastrophic anywhere. But the Atlanta area and other parts of the South are particularly vulnerable: Many trees and limbs hang over power lines.


Around the Deep South, slick roads were causing problems. Three people were killed and one injured after an ambulance careened off a slick West Texas roadway and caught fire. Icy conditions caused the ambulance to lose control, veer off the road near Carlsbad, then flip upside down before catching fire, the Texas Public Safety Department said.


On Tuesday, four people died in North Texas, including a Dallas firefighter who was knocked from an Interstate 20 ramp and fell 50 feet. In Mississippi, two weather-related traffic deaths were reported.


Delta canceled nearly 2,200 flights on Tuesday and Wednesday, most of them in Atlanta.


For Bob Peattie of Bayshore, N.Y., and Lee Harbin of San Antonio, Texas, it was the second time in two weeks that their business meetings in Atlanta were canceled because of bad weather. Both work for a software consulting company were staying put at downtown hotel.


“In two weeks, we’ll do it again,” Harbin said, laughing.


They planned to work as long as the power remained on and they had Internet access.


“We can be sitting anywhere as long as we have connectivity,” Peattie said. “You make the best out of everything.”


___


Associated Press writers Ray Henry and Jeff Martin in Atlanta; Jay Reeves in Birmingham, Ala.; and Russ Bynum in Savannah, Ga., contributed to this report.


___


Follow Christina Almeida Cassidy on Twitter: http://twitter.com/AP_Christina.


Associated Press




Top Headlines



Ice storm encases parts of the South

Sunday, February 2, 2014

Friday, January 3, 2014

Body Parts - Denmark

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Body Parts - Denmark

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

St Jude storm hits Russia after devastating parts of Europe

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



St Jude storm hits Russia after devastating parts of Europe

Friday, October 25, 2013

Lock, stock and a smoking printer? UK police seize ‘3D-printed gun parts’

Lock, stock and a smoking printer? UK police seize ‘3D-printed gun parts’
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/71719__3d-printer-seized-uk.si.jpg



Published time: October 25, 2013 15:48

A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a 3D printer seized by British police during an operation that also resulted in the seizure of plastic 3D components that police believe could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)

A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a 3D printer seized by British police during an operation that also resulted in the seizure of plastic 3D components that police believe could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)




British police say they’ve seized a 3D printer and 3D-printed gun components, including a trigger and a magazine capable of holding bullets, during a raid in Manchester. Critics, however, say they found nothing more than spare printer parts.


The alleged gun parts were discovered, along with the 3D printer, when officers from the Greater Manchester Police force carried out a search Thursday in the Baguley area of Wythenshawe, in the south of Manchester.


If the parts prove to be legitimate, the bust would represent the first-ever seizure of the next-generation weapon, which can be constructed by a 3D printer almost entirely out of plastic – creating the possibility of evading detection by airport security metal detectors.


The components are now being forensically examined by firearms specialists to establish if they could be used to construct a functional device.


A man has been arrested on suspicion of making gunpowder and is currently in custody for questioning.


Police fear such weapons can be created by criminals in the privacy of their own homes, thus evading detection by security scanners at airports and other high-risk targets.

“If what we have seized is proven to be viable, components capable of constructing a genuine firearm, then it demonstrates that organized crime groups are acquiring technology that can be bought on the high street to produce the next generation of weapons,”
Greater Manchester Detective Inspector Chris Mossop told Sky News.

“In theory, the technology essentially allows offenders to produce their own guns in the privacy of their own home, which they can then supply to the criminal gangs who are causing such misery in our communities,” he said. “Because they are also plastic and can avoid X-ray detection, it makes them easy to conceal and smuggle. These could be the next generation of firearms.”


A commenter on the California tech-blog GigaOM noted, however, that the parts being paraded in the media “are actually spare parts for a 3D printer,” and not components for a weapon.


“If the police thinks that the part on the photo is a trigger, just search mk8 on thingiverse.com and you will see that it’s a upgrade part for a printer. I really don’t get this media/police fascination relating to 3d printers with guns… it’s a tool to make 3d parts, not guns,” user nuno gato wrote.


A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a plastic component that British police suspect to be a trigger that could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun, seized by police during searches as part of an operation in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)


Hours later, New Scientist came to the same conclusion, noting the “trigger” identified by police appears to be part of a MakerBot 3D printer designed to extrude 3D-printing plastic to make an object. The “clip,” incidentally, looks like a part intended to hold spools of plastic.


“It does look like the MakerBot part,” Stuart Offer, of 3D-printing firm 3T RPD in the UK city of Newbury, told the magazine. “These 3D printed guns seem to have hit the headlines, but I’ve no idea why they take off so much,” he said, noting that homemade weapons were not that difficult to manufacture. “A little engineer in his shed with a mill down the bottom of the garden could make a proper metal barrel capable of firing a high-velocity bullet.”


A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a plastic component that British police suspect to be a magazine that could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun, seized by police during searches as part of an operation in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)


3D printed weapons first came to the attention of law enforcement officials worldwide after Defense Distributed announced it had successfully test-fired a handgun created with a 3D printer.


In May, the organization, founded by a 25-year-old crypto-anarchist Cody Wilson, posted blueprints for the single-shot .380-caliber Liberator online.


The files were downloaded more than 100,000 times in just two days before the US State Department demanded that they be removed. Britain was the No. 5 downloader of the plans upon publication, with Germany, Brazil, the United States and Spain filling out the top four positions.


A working version of the Liberator went on display in September in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London.


The only non-plastic part of the Liberator is a tiny nail that acts as the firing pin, as well as a .380 cartridge it fires. Wilson is reportedly working on fabricating plastic bullets, a move that would make it nearly undetectable at security screenings.  3D-printed firearms can also be manufactured without serial numbers or unique identifiers, tripping up ballistics testing.


Anyone with a sufficiently sophisticated 3D printer, which can be bought for $ 1,725 or even less, can make such weapons.


After users download designs for guns or components, the printers themselves ejects molten plastic to produce 3D shapes of whatever design has been downloaded.


An actual 3D gun can be made for as little as $ 25, according to a report by Forbes magazine.


Police agencies in Germany, Austria and Australia (http://rt.com/news/3d-gun-australia-police-758/) have been testing 3D weapons to get a better sense of their efficacy. Preliminary tests indicate a strong likelihood users could maim or kill themselves instead of the intended target, however, though the guns are expected to become increasingly sophisticated as technologies advance.


“In Germany and in most European countries, the possession of an unregistered weapon, even if it is manufactured at home, is illegal and punishable by law,” Michael Brzoska, a security expert and director of the Institute for Peace Research and Security Studies at the University of Hamburg, recently told the New York Times. “But the temptation to try, if it’s technically possible, is a great one.”


While it is currently legal for a person to manufacture a firearm for personal use in the US, the production of weapons using 3D printers is already banned by a European Union directive to member countries.


The UK imposed a ban on handguns after the 1996 Dunblane Primary School massacre, when a gunman shot 16 children and one adult before committing suicide.


So far, there are no reported violence crimes committed with 3D printed weapons.




RT – News




Read more about Lock, stock and a smoking printer? UK police seize ‘3D-printed gun parts’ and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Lock, stock and a smoking printer? UK police seize ‘3D-printed gun parts’



Published time: October 25, 2013 15:48

A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a 3D printer seized by British police during an operation that also resulted in the seizure of plastic 3D components that police believe could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)

A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a 3D printer seized by British police during an operation that also resulted in the seizure of plastic 3D components that police believe could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)




British police say they’ve seized a 3D printer and 3D-printed gun components, including a trigger and a magazine capable of holding bullets, during a raid in Manchester. Critics, however, say they found nothing more than spare printer parts.


The alleged gun parts were discovered, along with the 3D printer, when officers from the Greater Manchester Police force carried out a search Thursday in the Baguley area of Wythenshawe, in the south of Manchester.


If the parts prove to be legitimate, the bust would represent the first-ever seizure of the next-generation weapon, which can be constructed by a 3D printer almost entirely out of plastic – creating the possibility of evading detection by airport security metal detectors.


The components are now being forensically examined by firearms specialists to establish if they could be used to construct a functional device.


A man has been arrested on suspicion of making gunpowder and is currently in custody for questioning.


Police fear such weapons can be created by criminals in the privacy of their own homes, thus evading detection by security scanners at airports and other high-risk targets.

“If what we have seized is proven to be viable, components capable of constructing a genuine firearm, then it demonstrates that organized crime groups are acquiring technology that can be bought on the high street to produce the next generation of weapons,”
Greater Manchester Detective Inspector Chris Mossop told Sky News.

“In theory, the technology essentially allows offenders to produce their own guns in the privacy of their own home, which they can then supply to the criminal gangs who are causing such misery in our communities,” he said. “Because they are also plastic and can avoid X-ray detection, it makes them easy to conceal and smuggle. These could be the next generation of firearms.”


A commenter on the California tech-blog GigaOM noted, however, that the parts being paraded in the media “are actually spare parts for a 3D printer,” and not components for a weapon.


“If the police thinks that the part on the photo is a trigger, just search mk8 on thingiverse.com and you will see that it’s a upgrade part for a printer. I really don’t get this media/police fascination relating to 3d printers with guns… it’s a tool to make 3d parts, not guns,” user nuno gato wrote.


A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a plastic component that British police suspect to be a trigger that could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun, seized by police during searches as part of an operation in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)


Hours later, New Scientist came to the same conclusion, noting the “trigger” identified by police appears to be part of a MakerBot 3D printer designed to extrude 3D-printing plastic to make an object. The “clip,” incidentally, looks like a part intended to hold spools of plastic.


“It does look like the MakerBot part,” Stuart Offer, of 3D-printing firm 3T RPD in the UK city of Newbury, told the magazine. “These 3D printed guns seem to have hit the headlines, but I’ve no idea why they take off so much,” he said, noting that homemade weapons were not that difficult to manufacture. “A little engineer in his shed with a mill down the bottom of the garden could make a proper metal barrel capable of firing a high-velocity bullet.”


A handout picture taken on October 24, 2013 and released by Greater Manchester Police on October 25, 2013 shows a plastic component that British police suspect to be a magazine that could be used to make a viable 3D-printed gun, seized by police during searches as part of an operation in the Baguley area of Manchester, northwest England on October 24, 2013. (AFP Photo)


3D printed weapons first came to the attention of law enforcement officials worldwide after Defense Distributed announced it had successfully test-fired a handgun created with a 3D printer.


In May, the organization, founded by a 25-year-old crypto-anarchist Cody Wilson, posted blueprints for the single-shot .380-caliber Liberator online.


The files were downloaded more than 100,000 times in just two days before the US State Department demanded that they be removed. Britain was the No. 5 downloader of the plans upon publication, with Germany, Brazil, the United States and Spain filling out the top four positions.


A working version of the Liberator went on display in September in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London.


The only non-plastic part of the Liberator is a tiny nail that acts as the firing pin, as well as a .380 cartridge it fires. Wilson is reportedly working on fabricating plastic bullets, a move that would make it nearly undetectable at security screenings.  3D-printed firearms can also be manufactured without serial numbers or unique identifiers, tripping up ballistics testing.


Anyone with a sufficiently sophisticated 3D printer, which can be bought for $ 1,725 or even less, can make such weapons.


After users download designs for guns or components, the printers themselves ejects molten plastic to produce 3D shapes of whatever design has been downloaded.


An actual 3D gun can be made for as little as $ 25, according to a report by Forbes magazine.


Police agencies in Germany, Austria and Australia (http://rt.com/news/3d-gun-australia-police-758/) have been testing 3D weapons to get a better sense of their efficacy. Preliminary tests indicate a strong likelihood users could maim or kill themselves instead of the intended target, however, though the guns are expected to become increasingly sophisticated as technologies advance.


“In Germany and in most European countries, the possession of an unregistered weapon, even if it is manufactured at home, is illegal and punishable by law,” Michael Brzoska, a security expert and director of the Institute for Peace Research and Security Studies at the University of Hamburg, recently told the New York Times. “But the temptation to try, if it’s technically possible, is a great one.”


While it is currently legal for a person to manufacture a firearm for personal use in the US, the production of weapons using 3D printers is already banned by a European Union directive to member countries.


The UK imposed a ban on handguns after the 1996 Dunblane Primary School massacre, when a gunman shot 16 children and one adult before committing suicide.


So far, there are no reported violence crimes committed with 3D printed weapons.




RT – News



Lock, stock and a smoking printer? UK police seize ‘3D-printed gun parts’

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Cartoon: Obamacare Parts


%7B35e2b5a4 2317 4c75 92a1 6e7a99dce013%7D Obamacare Parts


©2013 Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.



Western Journalism



Cartoon: Obamacare Parts

Cartoon: Obamacare Parts


%7B35e2b5a4 2317 4c75 92a1 6e7a99dce013%7D Obamacare Parts


©2013 Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.



Western Journalism



Cartoon: Obamacare Parts

Cartoon: Obamacare Parts


%7B35e2b5a4 2317 4c75 92a1 6e7a99dce013%7D Obamacare Parts


©2013 Nate Beeler, The Columbus Dispatch


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.



Western Journalism



Cartoon: Obamacare Parts

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Alabama Abortion Ban 2013: Parts Of Alabama"s Abortion Ban Are Blocked in Court

alabama, abortion, ban, 2013:, parts, of, alabamas, abortion, ban, are, blocked, in, court,

Alabama Abortion Ban 2013: Parts Of Alabama’s Abortion Ban Are Blocked in Court




On Friday, U.S. District Judge Myron Thompson temporarily blocked a portion of Alabama’s TRAP (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) bill from taking effect until July 12. Regularly scheduled to take effect on July 1, the provision covered by the judge’s ruling would require that physicians performing abortions in the state have admitting privileges to local hospitals. While it is likely that this provision will be overturned, other provisions of HB 57 have the potential to close clinics and increase the cost of abortion procedures for patients.


The lawsuit, filed on June 11 by Planned Parenthood Southeast and Reproductive Health Services (a privately-owned clinic in Montgomery), claims that the provision of HB 57 that requires physicians who perform abortions to have hospital admitting privileges would create an undue burden on people seeking legal abortion services. Because many abortion providers do not live in the communities (or even the states) in which they work, it can be difficult for them to receive admitting privileges from hospitals in those communities. Furthermore, the stigma of providing abortions would also prevent many local physicians from being granted admitting privileges.


Though many state lawmakers have said that HB 57 is intended to increase the safety of abortion services, there is no evidence to suggest that legal abortions performed in Alabama require additional regulation. Nationwide, only 0.3% of all abortions result in complications that require hospitalization. Alabama’s rates are lower.


“We’re an extremely low-risk facility,” Dalton Johnson, the owner and operator of Huntsville’s Alabama Women’s Center for Reproductive Alternatives, said of his own clinic. “Our safety record shows that. Fifteen thousand procedures in 12 years and only six complications and no fatalities. There are procedures with higher risks they need to look into.”


While Judge Thompson believes that the admitting privileges requirement of the law will likely be overturned, HB 57′s requirement that clinics make the necessary upgrades to meet the state’s regulatory standards for ambulatory surgical centers could still close clinics and, at the very least, decrease or eliminate abortion access for those with little or no income.


“It requires clinics to be like a miniature hospital. It’s going to pretty much probably close us down,” Johnson said. “I’m letting my staff know that it’s a possibility.”


The financial burden to transition into an ambulatory surgical center will disproportionately affect privately owned clinics. Gloria Gray, the operator and part-owner of Tuscaloosa’s West Alabama Women’s Center, said, “It is much more difficult for an independent clinic to meet the requirements of the law or to challenge the law due to limited financial resources.” While nonprofit organizations like Planned Parenthood have “their own attorneys on staff who are able to challenge the law and numerous resources available in donations and federal funds,” privately owned clinics have a much more difficult time fundraising to pay legal fees to challenge the law or become compliant with newly imposed regulations.


Because of the stigma attached to providing abortion services, some privately owned clinics are also having difficulty finding architects and contractors that will agree to work with them on making the mandated upgrades, and, even when people can be hired, privately owned clinics must be able to pay for these services using their own financial resources.


Coming up with the money to meet Alabama’s regulatory standards for ambulatory surgical centers will ultimately come out of the pockets of patients, but it’s not clear as to whether patients will be able to afford the high cost of procedures in these “safer” clinics.


Currently, the average cost of a medical abortion (RU 486, Mifepristone, Mifeprex) is $ 450 in Alabama and is effective for terminating pregnancies up to eight weeks. The cheapest surgical abortions can be performed from about 5-11 weeks into the pregnancy and cost, on average, $ 400. However, surgical abortion patients can expect to add at least $ 100 to the cost of the procedure for every additional week after 11 weeks.


While service fees at the West Alabama Women’s Center will not increase as a result of the mandated upgrades, patients at the Alabama Women’s Center for Reproductive Alternatives will most definitely face fee increases if the clinic can remain open. Rightly, Johnson worries that the patients affected most by HB 57 will be those low-income and no-income patients who come from outside Alabama to obtain abortion services.


“We have people who ride the bus to get here,” Johnson said. “They come from places like Mississippi, where there’s only one clinic, and they take the bus to Huntsville and get a cab from the bus station to the clinic. Then they have to get a hotel room, because they have to wait at least 24 hours to have the procedure done.”


In addition to overturning the requirement that abortion providers have local hospital admitting privileges, the federal court should recognize that the increased cost of abortion services that results from TRAP legislation places an undue financial burden on those who seek to exercise their right to terminate a pregnancy.         




PolicyMic



Alabama Abortion Ban 2013: Parts Of Alabama"s Abortion Ban Are Blocked in Court