Showing posts with label Sorry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sorry. Show all posts

Sunday, March 9, 2014

ISSA TO CUMMINGS: I"M SORRY – Gillibrand"s military sex assault bill defeated – DOJ INVOLVED IN CIA, SENATE FLAP -- Rubio"s 2nd act – Increase the size of the House?


By Scott Wong (swong@politico.com or @scottwongDC)


ISSA’S MEA CULPA – POLITICO’s John Bresnahan reports on the words you don’t hear from Darrell Issa every day: I’m sorry: “Controversial GOP Rep. Darrell Issa has apologized to the top Democrat on the Oversight and Government Reform Committee following an ugly incident during a Wednesday hearing on alleged IRS abuses. Issa, a California Republican and chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee, had the microphone for Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings cut off during the middle of a statement by the Maryland lawmaker. The move infuriated Cummings and other Democrats, who went to the House floor on Thursday with a motion condemning Issa’s actions.


– “While Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and other Republicans backed him and easily defeated the Democratic motion, the partisan controversy threatened to derail Issa’s investigation into whether the IRS improperly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. Issa called Cummings on Thursday evening to offer his apologies, Cummings said in a statement released by his office. … For his part, Issa admitted that he should have been ‘more sensitive’ to Cummings’s request to offer a statement during an appearance by Lois Lerner, an IRS official at the center of the scandal. … But Issa and Cummings are likely to return to their partisan battling next week, when Issa is expected to move forward with a contempt resolution against Lois Lerner, a former IRS official at the center of the controversy.” http://politi.co/P7xDPI


MILITARY SEXUAL ASSAULT: FROM SCANDAL TO CAUSE – Anna Palmer, Juana Summers and Darren Samuelsohn write for the hometown paper: “Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and supporters of her crusade to take military sexual assault cases out of the chain of command lost a major battle Thursday when the proposal was defeated in a procedural vote. But the war is not over. The yearlong campaign transformed the evolution of military sexual assault from episodic scandals to a full-blown mega-cause with staying power — complete with appearances in popular culture and powerful champions who’ve learned the issue can be politically potent. …


– “Supporters of reform promise the military is going to face ongoing pressure on the powerful political issue. And they’ll have another chance later this year when Congress sets to work writing the next defense authorization bill. ‘I think this entire legislative battle has elevated the stakes and the merits of this issue,’ said Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), a 2016 presidential aspirant, who supported Gillibrand. … Cruz pointed out, the concept behind Gillibrand’s proposal served as an important story line in the second season of the popular Netflix show ‘House of Cards.’ ‘I’ve watched the entire second season,’ Cruz said. ‘I was encouraged to see that the signature issue was this issue.’” http://politi.co/1f5dwLC


– The Gillibrand bill came up five votes short of the 60 needed to break a filibuster, with 10 Republicans backing the measure and 10 Democrats opposing it. Passage of Sen. Claire McCaskill’s alternative “was never in question. Gillibrand even came out in support of it when it was first introduced. And sure enough, the procedural vote to advance McCaskill’s bill Thursday was 100-0, though a vote on final passage was delayed until Monday,” Samuelsohn, Summers and Palmer write. http://politi.co/MTcdDU


– SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-S.C.) never was going to endorse Rand Paul or Ted Cruz for president, but he took aim at the senators for backing the Gillibrand bill without mentioning them by name: “You want to be commander in chief? You told me a lot today about who you are as a commander in chief candidate,” Graham said at a press conference after the vote. “You were willing to fire every commander in the military for reasons I don’t quite understand,” he said. “We’ll have a good discussion as to whether or not you understand how the military actually works.” The Hill’s Jeremy Herb: http://bit.ly/1jYFskV


** REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS FINALLY AGREE! *But not if Congress gives up before the March 31 deadline. Congress finally has bipartisan legislation to repeal Medicare’s broken funding formula.  SGR is the problem; H.R. 4015 and S. 2000 are the solution. FixMedicareNow.org 


UKRAINE WILL VOTE TO SECEDE, JOIN RUSSIA – The Wall Street Journal’s Lukas I. Alpert in Moscow and Margaret Coker in Simferopol, Ukraine: “Crimea’s Moscow-backed government voted to secede from Ukraine and join Russia and accelerated a snap referendum to ratify the move, a dramatic escalation of tension that pushed the West closer to imposing sanctions if Russian troops don’t withdraw. The scheduling of the vote for March 16 means that Crimea could be absorbed into Russia in a matter of weeks. It also means the referendum could be held while the region is under de facto Russian occupation—with no opportunity for a free and fair campaign. A Russian move to absorb Crimea against the will of Ukraine’s national government would mark the first time since World War II that such a maneuver had been attempted in Europe.


– “U.S. and European leaders said Thursday that such a referendum would violate the Ukrainian constitution and international law. President Barack Obama spoke for an hour Thursday afternoon with Russian President Vladimir Putin, the White House said, stressing Russian violations of Ukrainian sovereignty and urging Moscow to talk to the new government in Kiev. He also urged Mr. Putin to ensure all Russian forces return to their bases and to support new elections in May. Any discussion about the future of Ukraine must include the legitimate government of Ukraine,’ Mr. Obama said at the White House. ‘In 2014, we are well beyond the days when borders can be redrawn over the heads of democratic leaders.’” http://on.wsj.com/1gctm3e


– THE HOUSE, on a lopsided 385-23 vote, passed legislation providing loan guarantees to the new Ukrainian government, but senators are hoping to move on their own, more comprehensive bill. POLITICO’s Seung Min Kim: http://politi.co/1g4WZak


– SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER, writing in a WSJ op-ed, calls on Obama to export U.S. natural gas to Europe to disrupt Putin’s energy influence there: “In response to Mr. Putin’s aggression in Ukraine, President Obama should announce a series of steps that will dramatically expand production of American-made energy, beginning with lifting this de facto ban on exports of U.S.-produced liquefied natural gas. Taking this step would also create American jobs and lower prices for our consumers and small businesses when coupled with other moves that would bolster energy production in North America. These include construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, ending the Obama administration’s embargo on our supplies of oil and gas from federal lands and waters, and halting the effort to take coal out of America’s electricity generation mix.


– “The president doesn’t need legislation from Congress to make these changes. This is something the commander in chief can do right now in the face of Mr. Putin’s aggression. It would also provide much-needed evidence that the president’s State of the Union commitment to an ‘all of the above’ energy strategy is real, and not just poll-driven rhetoric. America not only has a right to develop and market its natural resources. In the face of rising danger, it has an obligation to do so.” http://on.wsj.com/1iio3pX


SENATE GOP LEADER MITCH McCONNELL writes in a USA Today op-ed: “With this latest [Obamacare] delay], the president is basically now telling Americans: If you like your plan, some of you can keep it — but only until the next election.” http://usat.ly/1f4gwaY


HARRY REID says his wife, Landra, came up with his “addicted to Koch” line. BuzzFeed’s Kate Nocera: http://bzfd.it/1jYArsr


REP. FREDERICA WILSON (D-FLA.) will accompany President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama on Air Force One and Marine One today as they fly to Miami’s Coral Reef Senior High School to speak about education. Wilson is a frequent flier on Air Force One: Her Cannon Building office is adorned with photos of various trips she’s taken with the president. 


GOOD FRIDAY MORNING, MARCH 7, 2014, and welcome to The Huddle, your play-by-play preview of all the action on Capitol Hill. Send tips, suggestions, comments, complaints and corrections to swong@politico.com. If you don’t already, please follow me on Twitter @scottwongDC.


My new followers include @HannahSalem and @beckybowers.


TODAY IN CONGRESS – Both the House and Senate are out today, and no press events are scheduled on the Hill. But CPAC continues at National Harbor, including speeches from Sen. John Cornyn of Texas at 9:16 a.m., former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum at 2:26 p.m. and Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul at 2:51 p.m.


HIS HOLINESS THE DALAI LAMA, opened the Senate in prayer yesterday: “With our thoughts, we make our world. Our mind is central and precedes our deeds. Speak or act with a pure mind, and happiness will follow you like a shadow that never leaves.”


DOJ NOW INVOLVED IN CIA, SENATE FLAP – Mark Hosenball reports for Reuters: “The Justice Department and FBI are looking into a dispute over Senate investigators’ access to what the Central Intelligence Agency regarded as highly privileged and sensitive documents about its use of “enhanced” interrogation techniques, sources familiar with the inquiry said on Thursday. The CIA’s inspector general asked the Justice Department to become involved after the agency and members of the Senate Intelligence Committee got into a dispute over whether Senate investigators looked at documents they were not supposed to see, and whether agency operatives inappropriately monitored Senate investigators.” http://yhoo.it/1hSwZiY


IN SECOND ACT, RUBIO PUSHES STRENGTH ABROAD – Jonathan Martin writes for the New York Times: “The road to presidential success in Iowa and New Hampshire may not run through the Crimean Peninsula or the streets of Caracas, but in recent weeks [Sen. Marco] Rubio has used Russia’s incursion into Ukraine and the violent clashes in Venezuela to remind Republicans of their orthodoxy — projecting strength abroad — and of why he was such a favorite in the party before seeing his popularity slip over his backing of an immigration overhaul. … Addressing a gathering of conservatives here on Thursday, Mr. Rubio, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, sought to link the right’s resolute belief in American exceptionalism with a call for the United States to play a more robust role in confronting bad actors on the world stage.


– “That posture stands in contrast with other members of his party, notably Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, who argues that the United States should be wary of foreign intervention and retreat from the policies of the George W. Bush era. The divergent national security views of the two ambitious, first-term senators offer an early preview of a debate sure to play out in the Republican presidential primary in 2016. ‘There is only one nation on earth capable of rallying and bringing together the free people on this planet to stand up to the spread of totalitarianism,’ Mr. Rubio told attendees of the Conservative Political Action Conference, offering a tour d’horizon of affairs in China, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela and Russia.” http://nyti.ms/1cH9Afh


JARRETT COMPLAINS ABOUT MURGUÍA’S ‘DEPORTER-IN-CHIEF’ QUIP – Reid Epstein and Seung Min Kim report for POLITICO: “The White House is finding itself increasingly on defense over deportations of undocumented immigrants, as key Democrats and a top immigration reform group have gone public this week with their desire for President Barack Obama to act. National Council of La Raza President Janet Murguía called Obama the “deporter-in-chief” in a major speech Tuesday, leading to angry phone calls from senior White House officials — including adviser Valerie Jarrett — according to three people familiar with the calls. Jarrett told Murguía that Obama was ‘very disappointed’ with the statement, the sources said. … ‘It’s fair to say I heard from the White House and they were disappointed,’ Murguía said in an interview Thursday. The White House declined to comment on the calls.” http://politi.co/1fO4jm9


SINEMA WON’T SWITCH DISTRICTS – Rebekah Sanders reports for The Arizona Republic: “U.S. Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Ariz., said Thursday that she will remain in her competitive re-election race instead of running for the solidly Democratic Phoenix seat held by retiring Rep. Ed Pastor. Sinema’s decision will likely be a relief for many Democrats, who feared her departure from the toss-up District 9 would hurt the party’s chances of keeping the seat. Sinema confirmed her decision in a phone interview from Washington, D.C., with The Arizona Republic, ending days of speculation as she huddled with top advisers about her options.  … Most analysts consider her to be in a strong position for re-election in the Tempe-based seat, though she is likely to face a GOP challenge every two years.” http://bit.ly/1hSiDyD


BIG MONEY IN RACE TO SUCCEED BILL YOUNG – The Washington Post’s Paul Kane reports from Clearwater, Fla.: “The race to succeed the late C.W. Bill Young has stunned voters here accustomed to sleepy campaigns over the genteel and popular congressman’s four-decade tenure. Almost twice as much money has been spent in the general election — at least $ 8.3 million by the nominees to fill Young’s seat, the party campaign committees and outside activist groups — than Young, a Republican, spent combined in his successful runs in the previous six races in this century.


– “Perhaps most surprising in the neck-and-neck race between Democrat Alex Sink and Republican David Jolly is that Sink and her allies have a decided financial edge, blanketing the airwaves with more ads than her opponent ahead of Tuesday’s vote. This money has given her the chance to win despite lingering Democratic doubts that the party’s voters will show up in a low-turnout special election. While Jolly fought a tough primary, draining his resources for the general election, Sink hoarded her cash for an eight-week sprint to the finish. Her campaign has spent $ 2 million on television advertising in the general election campaign, compared with just $ 542,000 for Jolly, according to a tally sheet from a conservative group monitoring the spending.” http://wapo.st/1ighP5s


IT’S TIME TO INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE HOUSE, argues Sean Trend, a senior columnist for Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball: “First, a bigger House would diminish the impact of malapportionment that comes with single-member states. … Second, increasing the size of the House could diminish the impact of gerrymandering. … Third, increasing the size of the House would make majority-minority districts easier to maintain. … Fourth, increasing the size of the House would improve rural representation. … Fifth, though this is difficult to measure and hence more speculative, increasing the size of the House could help mend some of the detachment that is felt between Washington and the states.” http://bit.ly/1cfDFI4


– NOT SO FAST, says Bloomberg View’s Jonathan Bernstein: “Trende’s case for a modestly bigger chamber, perhaps from 435 seats to some number between 550 or 650, is well-argued. He’s right that there is a problem of malapportionment with single-representative states. He’s also right that demographic descriptive representation, or creating a House that ‘looks like’ America, would be more manageable if there were more, smaller, districts. Nevertheless, I think the Big House is a bad idea, both on electoral and governing grounds. For elections, it would probably mean fewer voters in competitive districts, and less media attention to each individual election. … What about inside Congress? A Big House means more influence for the leadership, and less for each member. That’s exactly the opposite of what the House needs.” http://bit.ly/1cfDFI4


TODAY’S TRIVIA – No one correctly answered yesterday’s question, so we’ll ask it again today: John Boehner is the only former chairman of the House Education and Workforce Committee to become speaker. What former member of the House who served as speaker later became chairman of the Education committee? The first person to correctly answer gets a mention in the next day’s Huddle. Email me at swong@politico.com.


GET HUDDLE emailed to your Blackberry, iPhone or other mobile device each morning. Just enter your email address where it says “Sign Up.” http://www.politico.com/huddle/


** After years of saying “wait until next year,” Congress finally has bipartisan legislation to repeal Medicare’s broken funding formula. This is the news seniors have been waiting for. But we’re not over the finish line yet. Congress must act by March 31st to avoid another costly temporary patch. Let’s pass H.R. 4015/S. 2000, scrap the broken SGR formula and fix Medicare once and for all! FixMedicareNow.org




POLITICO – Top 10 – Huddle



ISSA TO CUMMINGS: I"M SORRY – Gillibrand"s military sex assault bill defeated – DOJ INVOLVED IN CIA, SENATE FLAP -- Rubio"s 2nd act – Increase the size of the House?

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Hewitt "sorry" over paedophile group











Former Labour Health Secretary Patricia Hewitt has apologised for having “got it wrong” in the row over a pro-paedophile group.


She said she took responsibility for mistakes made by the National Council for Civil Liberties in the 1970s when she was its general secretary.


The NCCL was “naive” over its links with the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE), Ms Hewitt said.


But she had never condoned the “vile crimes” of paedophiles, she added.


It is the first time Ms Hewitt, who said she had been away for the past 12 days, has publicly spoken since the latest controversy broke.


She said more should have been done to protect the integrity of the NCCL from the activities of PIE, which was allowed to join the organisation as an affiliate member.



‘Deep regret’

In a statement, Ms Hewitt said: “NCCL in the 1970s, along with many others, was naive and wrong to accept PIE’s claim to be a ‘campaigning and counselling organisation’ that ‘does not promote unlawful acts’.


“As general secretary then, I take responsibility for the mistakes we made. I got it wrong on PIE and I apologise for having done so.


“I should have urged the executive committee to take stronger measures to protect NCCL’s integrity from the activities of PIE members and sympathisers and I deeply regret not having done so.”




Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

BBC News – Home

Hewitt "sorry" over paedophile group

Saturday, February 15, 2014

UN sorry over Syria talks failure






























The UN mediator Lakhdar Brahimi: “It’s not good for Syria that we come back for another round and fall in the same traps”



The UN mediator Lakhdar Brahimi has apologised to the Syrian people after peace talks in Geneva ended without making progress.


He had held final discussions with both sides in Geneva in a last-ditch bid to break the stalemate between the Syrian government and opposition.


Mr Brahimi said a key sticking point was the government’s refusal to talk about a transitional governing body.


No date has been set for a third round of talks.


The UK and France have blamed President Assad’s government for the failure of the talks.


The conflict in Syria has claimed more than 100,000 lives since March 2011.


Some 9.5 million people have been forced to flee their homes.




Analysis


Lakhdar Brahimi is a man of patience and pragmatism. But after final face-to-face talks that lasted just 27 minutes, he emerged looking tired and dejected.


The hope had been that he could persuade the two sides to agree a date for a third round, but it was not to be.


A measure of Mr Brahimi’s frustration could be heard when he described the government and opposition fixation on their “pet subjects”.


The opposition has always insisted that a transitional government should be discussed, the regime wants to talk about violence and terrorism.


Arguing about these two things has prevented them talking about anything else: about any small confidence-building measure that might bring some relief to the people of Syria.


Mr Brahimi suggested the regime’s unwillingness to talk about transition was a particular obstacle, and instead of announcing progress, he found himself apologising to the Syrian people.



Suspicions raised

The discussions on Saturday morning lasted just 27 minutes, after which Mr Brahimi emerged looking tired to address reporters, the BBC’s Imogen Foulkes reports from Geneva.


Mr Brahimi apologised to the Syrian people, admitting that the talks “had not come out with very much”.


Although the two sides had agreed on an agenda for the next – third – round, Mr Brahimi said the government had rejected his suggestion to begin it by spending a day focusing on combating violence and terrorism, and a second day discussing a transitional government.


Mr Brahimi said the government’s stance “raises the suspicion of the opposition that the government doesn’t want to discuss [a transitional government] at all”.


He said he hoped that when the government spoke of implementing the 2012 Geneva Communique on bringing about a political settlement “they do mean a transitional governing body, exercising full executive power, will be the main objective”.


But the government’s chief negotiator, Bashar al-Jaafari, stressed that “terrorism” – rebel violence – must be dealt with fully first.


“Once you have an agenda you should respect the agenda fully without any interpretation or misinterpretation… we said that we cannot move from… item one to item two or item three or item four without fully considering this item and concluding by a common vision of this item by the two sides, something that the other side objected to.”


Opposition spokesman Louay Safi again insisted on discussion of a transitional government that does not include President Bashar al-Assad – something the government rejects.


“A third round without talking about transition would be a waste of time,” Mr Safi said.


Mr Brahimi said both sides needed “to go back to their base” for consultations and to think about whether they wanted the process to continue or not.


In further reaction to the breakdown of the talks, UK Foreign Secretary William Hague laid the blame squarely at the door of the Syrian government but said the Geneva process must continue.


“This cannot be the end of the road. With the war in Syria causing more death and destruction every day, we owe it to the people of Syria to do all we can to make progress towards a political solution.”


Mr Hague said Britain would also continue to push for a UN Security Council resolution to address the “appalling humanitarian suffering in Syria”.


French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the Syrian regime had “blocked any progress on establishing a transition government and stepped up violence and acts of terror against the civilian population.”


Applying pressure


So far, the only agreement in the latest negotiations was to allow civilians to leave the besieged city of Homs and aid to enter.


Correspondents say at least 5,000 people are believed to have died since the first round of the Geneva talks began on 22 January.


US President Barack Obama said on Friday that he was considering ways of putting more pressure on President Assad, though he did not expect any resolution in the short term.


Speaking in California, where he was meeting Jordan’s King Abdullah, he said: “There will be some intermediate steps that we can take applying more pressure to the Assad regime and we are going to be continuing to work with all the parties concerned to try to move forward on a diplomatic solution.”


Mr Obama did not disclose what steps he has under consideration.




Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

BBC News – Home

UN sorry over Syria talks failure

Friday, December 27, 2013

Al Qaeda: Were sorry about Yemen hospital attack

(CNN) — Its something you dont often hear from the leaders of a terrorist group known for violence: Were sorry. But thats just what the head of al Qaeda in the Arabian…
AboveTopSecret.com New Topics In War On Terrorism



Al Qaeda: Were sorry about Yemen hospital attack

Monday, December 2, 2013

Dem Rep. Ellison: Obama Meant "If You Misunderstood What I Was Trying To Say, I"m Sorry"





REP. KEITH ELLISON (D-MINN.): You know, I just want to say that I think that everything that the president said and did was in pursuit of trying to get Americans, all Americans health care. So I think even though he may have said, if you like your decent insurance, your insurance that works, then you can keep it, I think that people really get that. When — he owned it. He said, look, man, if you misunderstood what I was trying to say, I’m sorry about that.


I think that shows integrity. He didn’t do anything to self-promote. He did — what he was doing he was trying to do — to help Americans all over this country for decades.


REP. TOM COLE (R-OK): I’m going to disagree a little bit–


(CROSSTALK)


ELLISON: Intentions count.


COLE: — with Keith. We knew back in 2009, 2010, this was going to happen. The Congressional Budget Office put out studies about it. We made the points, and we know now the administration had plenty of documents.


(CROSSTALK)


COLE: — were going to lose health care here. So I think this does get to credibility as well as competence.


ELLISON: These plans actually, many of these, these high-deductible, high-exclusion plans, they don’t — they were not quality plans in many cases. And the fact is, they were for a small — they might work for somebody who had a lot of money saved up, but for other folks, they just didn’t. There’s a reason those premiums were low.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Dem Rep. Ellison: Obama Meant "If You Misunderstood What I Was Trying To Say, I"m Sorry"

Monday, August 5, 2013

Fonterra "sorry" for botulism scare


FonterraBotulism is an extremely dangerous form of food poisoning and can cause paralysis


New Zealand Prime Minister John Key has questioned why dairy giant Fonterra delayed raising alarm over products contaminated with bacteria that can cause botulism.


His comments came as Russia and China banned imports of affected products, which include baby milk formula.


Fonterra said the bacteria came from a dirty pipe at a processing plant for whey protein concentrate.


New Zealand is the world’s largest dairy exporter.


“When you’ve got a company that’s our largest company, our largest brand, our largest exporter that is the flagship for New Zealand and your whole business is about food safety and food quality you think they’d take such a precautionary view to these things and say if it’s testing for some reason in an odd way that it would just be discarded until they were absolutely sure that its right,” Mr Key said.


He said concerns were raised after a series of tests in May 2012.


Fonterra said the contaminated whey protein concentrate had been exported to China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand and Saudi Arabia.


So far, there have not been any illnesses reported related to the contaminated products.


China relies heavily on New Zealand for its imports of milk powder. The country experienced a tainted milk scandal in 2008 that killed six babies and made about 300,000 ill.


According to Chinese state media, nearly 80% of dairy products imported by China come from New Zealand.


On Saturday, Fonterra announced that it had found the contamination, which led to a global recall of up to 1,000 tonnes of dairy products in seven countries.


It said the bacteria had been found in three batches of whey protein which had been used in Nutricia Karicare for infants.


Botulism is an extremely dangerous form of food poisoning.




BBC News – Asia



Fonterra "sorry" for botulism scare