Showing posts with label summit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label summit. Show all posts

Friday, April 4, 2014

Conservatives and Libertarians Meet for Florida Liberty Summit as Establishment GOP Plans Retreat

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



var addthis_config = "data_track_clickback":false,"data_track_addressbar":false,"data_track_textcopy":false,"ui_atversion":"300";
var addthis_product = "wpp-3.5.9";



Conservatives and Libertarians Meet for Florida Liberty Summit as Establishment GOP Plans Retreat

Saturday, March 1, 2014

GOP eyes AIPAC summit for Iran push

Rick Santorum speaks at an AIPAC conference in 2012. | AP Photo

The policy conference will bring thousands of AIPAC members to Washington. | AP Photo





Republicans hope a powerful pro-Israel group’s Washington fly-in can turn the tide in their quest for a vote on new Iran sanctions.


The American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s policy conference will bring thousands of AIPAC members to Washington beginning Sunday, a flood the GOP believes could help force reluctant Senate Democrats to vote on new economic penalties toward Iran.







The debate over what to do with Iran’s nuclear program has caused tensions between AIPAC and congressional Republicans, many of whom don’t understand why the group is not putting more of its political muscle behind the effort.


And now more than ever Senate Republicans are in desperate need for Democratic support after an effort to attach penalties to a veterans bill failed this week and fueled partisan discord.


Republicans believe a new push from AIPAC could help change the minds of Democrats who are deferring to President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who believe a sanctions vote would destroy delicate ongoing diplomatic talks with Iran. But they might be disappointed: Despite supporting the bill’s goals, AIPAC appears to oppose an immediate vote on sanctions given the lack of Democratic support.


“Our view is that we strongly support the legislation. We believe that it should be voted on when it would have the broadest bipartisan support,” an AIPAC source said. “We thought there shouldn’t be an immediate vote [in order] to build support.”


That stance has Republicans scratching their heads, given that AIPAC could very well help build that bipartisan support by taking a harder line. Several GOP senators said in interviews this week they hear a more urgent tone from AIPAC’s local branches than from the national organization.


“I was puzzled by the statement they put out a few weeks ago saying that they no longer thought now was the time to vote. I’m not sure that reflects their membership,” said Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). “I certainly think their membership does [want a vote]. That’s my impression from the meetings that I’ve had.”


“They are a very powerful and influential organization,” said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) “Sometimes, there’s been a disconnect between their leadership here in Washington and their rank-and-file.”


“The rank and file of AIPAC and just the average person who follows this has got to be very worried about the Senate’s inaction,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).


A senior Senate aide closely following the issue said “there’s an incredible amount of tension” between local AIPAC chapters itching for quick movement on sanctions and a D.C. apparatus that understands the delicate politics of the issue.


The AIPAC source denied any internal derision.


“Absolutely not. There’s a very united feeling. I think people will witness the unity this weekend,” the source said.


Christians United for Israel — a group often aligned with AIPAC — has split with the powerful group on sanctions legislation, bombarding senators with thousands of email requests for a quick vote. CUFI’s executive Director David Brog said in an interview that “now’s the time for a vote” and he hopes AIPAC eventually agrees.


“I’m going to be watching and listening very carefully to what comes out of the AIPAC policy conference,” Brog said. “I am hoping they will do the right thing, which is pressing for an up-or-down vote on this bill, as they have in the past.”


Some Republicans and those who closely follow AIPAC believe it is already moving in that direction.


“I think they are becoming more involved because they understand the severity of the problem,”said Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.). “They were dormant for a while but I think they’re coming back. I think they will be vocal about the need to bring up a sanctions bill.”


“They’re looking to get this done,” said Dr. Ben Chouake, president of NORPAC, a contributor to candidates favoring Israel.


But AIPAC has given no indication that it will shift its public position toward an immediate vote, as Republicans hope the hawkish lobby will do. Much can happen during six months of continuing diplomatic talks aimed at finding a permanent agreement and AIPAC sees no reason to box itself in, sources familiar with the issue said.


And Reid has been such an immovable force on sanctions since Obama intervened that a change in AIPAC’s position may not even move the needle with the unbending Democratic leader, who will meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday alongside Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), a strong backer of the sanction bill.


“AIPAC is practicing the art of the possible and knows when to extend all of its clout and when not to,” said Maury Amitay, a former AIPAC executive director. “Why go to the wall and put a lot of guys who have been good friends and supporters on the topic in a tough spot?”


Manu Raju contributed to this report.




POLITICO – Congress



GOP eyes AIPAC summit for Iran push

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

Obama arrives in Mexico for ‘Three Amigos’ summit that will show NAFTA strains


Barack ObamaSac Bee – by Tim Johnson


TOLUCA, Mexico – They were once dubbed the Three Amigos, but strains on their friendship cast a chill Wednesday as President Barack Obama flew to Mexico for a summit of the leaders of the world’s largest trading bloc.


A bilateral spat between Mexico and Canada, and anger in Ottawa over U.S. indecision on whether to build the Keystone XL pipeline from western Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast cooled the atmosphere of the seven-hour summit.  


Obama landed in Toluca, some 40 miles west of Mexico City at about 12:10 p.m. local time (1:10 pm. EST). He popped his head through the door of Air Force One seven minutes later and bounded down the stairs.


Before boarding the plane, the White House said, Obama signed a new executive order to reduce bureaucratic barriers and speed up imports and exports, helping businesses strengthen supply chains across borders. The move signaled that Obama would not cede to opposition to his trade agenda at home.


The gathering in Toluca, Mexico’s fifth largest city, coincides with the 20th anniversary of theNorth American Free Trade Agreement, or Nafta, which formed a market of 470 million people from Canada’s Yukon to the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico. The bloc represents more than 30 percent of global economic output.


But even as manufacturing chains are more integrated between the three nations, experts say the bloc has drifted on autopilot with a lack of strategic vision.


“Twenty years later, it’s hard for us to talk to each other and reach agreement,” said Laura Macdonald, a political scientist who specializes in the region at Carleton University in Ottawa.


Rather than re-debate Nafta, Obama is expected to press Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to speak with one voice as they negotiate the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a proposed trade bloc that includes 12 countries around the Pacific Rim.


Multiple tensions surround the summit, though, and it unfolds “at the worst moment in the trilateral relationship” since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks in the United States triggered concerns over border security, Macdonald said.


The bright spot is an energy revolution that is altering the global energy map and shifting its epicenter to North America, revitalizing manufacturing.


“We are in a fundamentally different place than we were even five years ago,” said Eric Farnsworth, vice president of the Council of the Americas, a Washington DC-based business group that promotes free trade, democracy and open markets in the hemisphere.


Farnsworth said bilateral issues and faltering political intentions have hindered efforts to develop the Nafta region “in a comprehensive and strategic manner.”


“That sense of broader purpose here is missing,” Farnsworth said.


Mexico is irked at Canada over visa requirements that have seen its tourism to Canada drop by about 50 percent since 2008 to a level of about 130,000 Mexicans per year. In contrast, 1.9 million Canadians visit Mexico annually.


Mexican diplomats say Canada requires 10 times more information from Mexican citizens to grant a visa than the U.S. government requires.


Harper and Pena Nieto oversaw the signing Tuesday of an expanded air transport accord that will allow more direct flights between Canada and Mexico but Harper made no public mention of whether Canada would ease visa requirements.


Harper is irritated with Obama for U.S. delays on deciding whether to proceed with the $ 5.4 billion Keystone XL pipeline designed to carry oil made from tar sands in the province of Alberta through the Midwest to refineries along the Gulf Coast.


Macdonald said the pipeline project “is the most important foreign policy objective of the Harper government” in its quest to become an energy superpower.


“Some of the Harper government statements have had an air of petulance about them – ‘You just have to answer us now,’” Macdonald said.


Also irritating U.S.-Canada relations are delays in replacing the aged Ambassador Bridge between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario, the single busiest international land border crossing in North America in terms of trade volume.


Even without coordinated policies to reinvigorate NAFTA, manufacturing supply chains increasingly bind the three nations. Over eight million U.S. jobs depend on trade with Canada, and another six million on trade with Mexico.


U.S.-Mexico trade topped $ 500 billion last year, and components and finished products travel back and forth across the border. Vehicles built in North America are said to have their parts cross the U.S. borders eight times before they are fully assembled.


“We design it together and we produce it together,” Farnsworth said of most goods, noting that 40 cents of each dollar of content of Mexican exports to the United States comes from materials and parts produced in U.S. plants.


Once annual summits between the Nafta leaders have grown less frequent. The leaders met in Guadalajara in 2009 and again in Washington DC in 2012.


The initial promise of the Nafta trade bloc led to the moniker the Three Amigos for the leaders of the three countries, taken from a 1986 comedy Western starring Steve Martin, Chevy Chase andMartin Short.



Email: tjohnson@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @timjohnson4



Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2014/02/19/6171285/obama-heads-to-mexico-summit-amid.html#storylink=cpy






Obama arrives in Mexico for ‘Three Amigos’ summit that will show NAFTA strains

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Climate Summit: Don’t turn Farmers into ‘Climate Smart’ Carbon Traders


Farmers produce food, not carbon. Yet, if some of the governments and corporate lobbies negotiating at the UN climate change conference to be held in Warsaw from 11-22 November have their way, farmland could soon be considered as a carbon sink that polluting corporations can buy into to compensate for their harmful emissions.


 ”We are directly opposed to the carbon market approach to dealing with the climate crisis,” says Josie Riffaud of La Vía Campesina. “Turning our farmers’ fields into carbon sinks – the rights to which can be sold on the carbon market – will only lead us further away from what we see as the real solution: food sovereignty. The carbon in our farms is not for sale!”


 Carbon trading has totally failed to address the real causes of the climate crisis. It was never meant to do so.


Rather than reducing carbon emissions at their source, it has created a lucrative market for polluters and speculators to buy and sell carbon credits while continuing to pollute. Now the pressure is increasing to treat farmland as a major carbon sink which can be claimed as yet another counterbalance to industrial emissions. The governments of the US and Australia, the World Bank and the corporate sector have long argued for this, and for the creation of new carbon markets where they can purchase land-based offsets in developing countries. Agribusiness is well positioned to profit from these, and some developing country governments hope that offering their forests, grasslands and farmland to polluters in the North could earn them revenue.


The November United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) conference in Warsaw risks pushing us deeper into this carbon market mess. Marcin Korolec, Poland’s minister of the environment and main organiser of the event, proudly announced that for the first time ever, representatives of global business will be formally part of the negotiations. A look at the list of official partners of the conference shows that they are amongst the most polluting industries of the world.


Agriculture is a major contributor to climate change, but Henk Hobbelink of GRAIN points out that: “It is the industrial food system – with its heavy use of chemical inputs, the soil erosion and deforestation that accompanies monoculture plantation farming, and the ever-growing drive to supply far away export markets – which is the main culprit behind the climate crisis. Rather than promoting this with carbon markets, the world’s leaders should support peasant farming and agroecology as the solution.” GRAIN’s research has shown that a sustained focus on peasant-based agroecological practices oriented toward restoring organic matter to soils could capture 24-30% of the current global annual greenhouse gas emissions.


 A week after the climate negotiators have flown home from Warsaw, most likely without having agreed to any meaningful action on the climate crisis, the World Bank and the governments of the Netherlands and South Africa will convene an international conference in Johannesburg to promote “climate smart agriculture”, and set up a new alliance to achieve it.


 But a look at the proposals on the table shows that it entails nothing more than business as usual: new genetically modified seeds developed by biotechnology corporations, more chemical fertilisers and pesticides by the agrochemical giants, and more ‘bio-intensive’ industrial plantation farming. “Climate smart agriculture has become the new slogan for the agricultural research establishment and the corporate sector to position themselves as the solution to the food and climate crisis,” says Pat Mooney of the ETC Group. “For the world’s small farmers, there is nothing smart about this. It is just another way to push corporate controlled technologies into their fields and rob them of their land.”


At the same time, these very corporations are developing other high-risk technologies, ranging from synthetic biology, to nanotechnology and geoengineering. There is no clear understanding of their impacts and these new dramatic technologies will wreak more havoc on our already fragile planet than cure the climate and environmental crises.


Agriculture’s central role of feeding people and providing livelihoods to smallholders around the world should be defended, says Elizabeth Mpofu, from Vía Campesina. “Rights over our farms, lands, seeds and natural resources need to remain in our hands so we can produce food and care for our mother earth as peasant farmers have done for centuries. We will not allow carbon markets to turn our hard work into carbon sinks that allow polluters to continue their business as usual.”


For more information:


Josie Riffaud, La Vía Campesina
+33613105291
[email protected]

Henk Hobbelink, GRAIN
+34 933011381
[email protected]

Pat Mooney, ETC Group


+1 6132412267


Notes:


* Vía Campesina is the global movement of peasant farmers struggling for food sovereignty. GRAIN and ETC Group are international organisations that fight the industrial food system and support peasant based alternatives. They have joined forces in a partnership to advance peasant based agroecology.


* For Vía Campesina’s positions on food and climate, see: “Small Scale Sustainable Farmers Are Cooling Down The Earth


* For GRAIN’s paper on the role of the industrial food system in the climate crisis, and how peasant led agroecology is the real solution, see: “Food and climate change, the forgotten link“.


* For ETC Group’s poster on the contributions of the Peasant Food Web to feeding the world compared to the industrial food chain, see: “Who Will Feed Us? The Industrial Food Chain/ThePeasant Food Web




Global Research

(No Ratings Yet)


Climate Summit: Don’t turn Farmers into ‘Climate Smart’ Carbon Traders

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Top spying fallout: EU summit promises NSA thunder, data-protection storm

Top spying fallout: EU summit promises NSA thunder, data-protection storm
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ace0f__000_dv1550338.si.jpg



Published time: October 24, 2013 15:31

France

France’s President Francois Hollande and Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel (AFP Photo / Eric Feferberg)




Ahead of the EU summit in Brussels, Germany’s Angel Merkel and France’s Francois Hollande have discussed wiretapping of their communications by America’s NSA. The scandal could push a frustrated EU to change data privacy rules.


The EU summit starting Thursday is expected to be hijacked by recent revelations provided by the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, which infuriated both Berlin and Paris.


On the same day the summit kicks off, Germany announced it had information that allied US National Security Service had monitored Chancellor Angela Merkel’s personal phone. Earlier, France learnt from reports in Le Monde that the NSA has been recording dozens of millions of phone calls, including those of the French authorities.


The fallout from the revelations was prompt and direct. Chancellor Merkel made a phone call to US President Barack Obama to sort out if her phone was tapped, while Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle summoned the US ambassador to explain the situation.


In a strongly-worded statement issued Wednesday, Merkel’s spokesman shared some details of the phone call with Obama. “She made clear that she views such practices, if proven true, as completely unacceptable and condemns them unequivocally,” the spokesman said.


Washington, which has been left at loggerheads with many of its allies due to Snowden’s revelations, deployed White House spokesman Jan Carney, who said that President Obama had done his best to reassure the German Chancellor, telling Merkel that the US “is not monitoring and will not monitor” her communications.


Carney also said that “the United States is not monitoring the communications of the [German] chancellor.”


But neither Obama nor Carney actually confirmed or denied that Merkel’s phone had been tapped previously.


I’m not in a position to comment publicly on every specific alleged intelligence activity,” Carney said.


German Chancellor Angela Merkel looking at an electronic device as she sits next to US President Barack Obama (AFP Photo / Christopher Furlong)


The French government is similarly upset with Washington. President François Hollande has not said whether his personal phone has been hacked by Washington, but the report that in just one month, between December 10, 2012, and January 8, 2013, the NSA managed to record 70.3 million French phone calls could not be shrugged off.


President Hollande has insisted that the phone tapping must be on the Brussels summit’s agenda.


EU countries could European nations could prepare a united declaration, demanding an exhaustive explanation from Washington.


The 28 members of the EU could also speed up the adoption of amendments to the bloc’s data protection rules, set in 1995, AFP reported Thursday.


This could seriously complicate life of American companies like Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo! and others that have been exposed as voluntarily sharing private data communications with the US secret services.


The new amendments would enable EU citizens to demand that IT companies erase traces of personal data from the internet. Stricter data protection rules would be applied to international electronic money transferring systems, such as the Europe-based SWIFT, also used by the US security agencies for collecting personal data on EU citizens.


In case the communication giants do not abide by the new regulations, fines could be as hefty as 100 million euros.


The potential regulations could make personal data collection in Europe impracticable financially. US communication giants have been furiously lobbying against the amendments.


Given the angry reactions of Berlin and Paris to US surveillance, the EU could put new data protection rules in place as early as 2015.


US President Barack Obama and French President Francois Hollande (AFP Photo / Jewel Samad)




RT – News




Read more about Top spying fallout: EU summit promises NSA thunder, data-protection storm and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Top spying fallout: EU summit promises NSA thunder, data-protection storm



Published time: October 24, 2013 15:31

France

France’s President Francois Hollande and Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel (AFP Photo / Eric Feferberg)




Ahead of the EU summit in Brussels, Germany’s Angel Merkel and France’s Francois Hollande have discussed wiretapping of their communications by America’s NSA. The scandal could push a frustrated EU to change data privacy rules.


The EU summit starting Thursday is expected to be hijacked by recent revelations provided by the former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, which infuriated both Berlin and Paris.


On the same day the summit kicks off, Germany announced it had information that allied US National Security Service had monitored Chancellor Angela Merkel’s personal phone. Earlier, France learnt from reports in Le Monde that the NSA has been recording dozens of millions of phone calls, including those of the French authorities.


The fallout from the revelations was prompt and direct. Chancellor Merkel made a phone call to US President Barack Obama to sort out if her phone was tapped, while Germany’s Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle summoned the US ambassador to explain the situation.


In a strongly-worded statement issued Wednesday, Merkel’s spokesman shared some details of the phone call with Obama. “She made clear that she views such practices, if proven true, as completely unacceptable and condemns them unequivocally,” the spokesman said.


Washington, which has been left at loggerheads with many of its allies due to Snowden’s revelations, deployed White House spokesman Jan Carney, who said that President Obama had done his best to reassure the German Chancellor, telling Merkel that the US “is not monitoring and will not monitor” her communications.


Carney also said that “the United States is not monitoring the communications of the [German] chancellor.”


But neither Obama nor Carney actually confirmed or denied that Merkel’s phone had been tapped previously.


I’m not in a position to comment publicly on every specific alleged intelligence activity,” Carney said.


German Chancellor Angela Merkel looking at an electronic device as she sits next to US President Barack Obama (AFP Photo / Christopher Furlong)


The French government is similarly upset with Washington. President François Hollande has not said whether his personal phone has been hacked by Washington, but the report that in just one month, between December 10, 2012, and January 8, 2013, the NSA managed to record 70.3 million French phone calls could not be shrugged off.


President Hollande has insisted that the phone tapping must be on the Brussels summit’s agenda.


EU countries could European nations could prepare a united declaration, demanding an exhaustive explanation from Washington.


The 28 members of the EU could also speed up the adoption of amendments to the bloc’s data protection rules, set in 1995, AFP reported Thursday.


This could seriously complicate life of American companies like Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Yahoo! and others that have been exposed as voluntarily sharing private data communications with the US secret services.


The new amendments would enable EU citizens to demand that IT companies erase traces of personal data from the internet. Stricter data protection rules would be applied to international electronic money transferring systems, such as the Europe-based SWIFT, also used by the US security agencies for collecting personal data on EU citizens.


In case the communication giants do not abide by the new regulations, fines could be as hefty as 100 million euros.


The potential regulations could make personal data collection in Europe impracticable financially. US communication giants have been furiously lobbying against the amendments.


Given the angry reactions of Berlin and Paris to US surveillance, the EU could put new data protection rules in place as early as 2015.


US President Barack Obama and French President Francois Hollande (AFP Photo / Jewel Samad)




RT – News



Top spying fallout: EU summit promises NSA thunder, data-protection storm

Monday, October 14, 2013

The Duggar Family makes an appearance at the Values Voters Summit (VIDEO)

The Duggar Family makes an appearance at the Values Voters Summit (VIDEO)
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/a2945__4767e5337e366d9708e0ac2b2feff479?s=100&d=http3A2F2F0.gravatar.com2Favatar2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb65235363Fs3D100&r=G


In the wake of heavy hitting speakers such as Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and Ben Carson, the attendees of the Values Voters Summit were treated to a more lighthearted event. The Duggar family, stars of the television show “19 Kids and Counting,” arrived with instruments in tow to perform for the audience.


Jim Bob Duggar opened by introducing the part of his family who appeared on stage, before ushering them into an miniature performance with traditional gospel singing and an instrumental medley.


After the rest of the family had exited, Jim Bob spoke about his own story which ultimately led to the creation of the TV show. In 1997 he and his wife had attended a doctor’s appointment and while there heard about a pro-life rally which was taking place at their state capitol in Arkansas. After the appointment, the Duggars decided to go and see what was happening.


What followed would orient the Duggar family in a whole new direction. At the rally many pro-lifers were pleading with state congressmen to pass a ban on partial-birth abortion. Despite their efforts the ban was struck down and partial-birth abortion remained legal. Watching this take place inspired Jim Bob to run for state office.


This decision would prove to be an important one for the Duggars. Jim Bob said, “at that time we had nine children, we only had a small family,” and they ran as a family, with the children campaigning for their father. Their efforts were rewarded and Jim Bob won the seat.


After a couple years of serving as Arkansas state representative, Jim Bob made the decision to sun for U.S. senate. Even though handily defeated at the polls, the race proved to be beneficial for the Duggar family nonetheless. While making an appearance on voting day, a picture was taken of the Duggars, a picture which ultimately ended up in the New York Times.


A series of interview and magazine articles followed, culminating in the idea for their current TV show. The Duggars decided to go ahead with it in order to show the blessings that a large family can bring and to highlight their Christian faith.


Mr. Duggar closed with another call to action from the audience. He asked the people in the audience either to run for office or to ask someone they know to run. He admonished them not to speak to their children about how America once was free, but to do something to ensure it remained free.


View the Duggar family’s appearance below:





Categories: Events, Politics

RELATED ARTICLES


  1. Tweet-up with XIV Foundation on colorblind Civil Rights

  2. The Duggar Family makes an appearance at the Values Voters Summit (VIDEO)

  3. VIDEO: Ted Cruz Rallies Conservatives, is Harassed by Leftists at Values Voters Summit

  4. Announcing our Tweet-Up with From the Right Radio!

  5. TIP SHEET: How to Protect Yourself Online (VIDEO)

COMMENTS




Watchdog Wire




Read more about The Duggar Family makes an appearance at the Values Voters Summit (VIDEO) and other interesting subjects concerning NSA at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Friday, September 27, 2013

The Alien-Life Summit


The Green Bank telescope is the world’s largest, fully steerable radio telescope. It is located in Green Bank, W.Va., in a quiet, radio-free zone.

Courtesy NRAO/AUI




Recent headlines about alien life in our planet’s atmosphere have been shot down to earth. But scientists are still looking for messages from and signs of other civilizations among faraway stars—carrying on the tradition that started more than 50 years ago, when some of the era’s most brilliant scientific minds got together to discuss the astronomical possibilities.




In 1961, J.P.T. Pearman of the National Academy of Sciences approached astronomer Frank Drake to help convene a small, informal SETI conference at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory’s Green Bank observatory. The core purpose of the meeting, Pearman explained, was to quantify whether SETI had any reasonable chance of successfully detecting civilizations around other stars.




Besides Drake and Pearman, three Nobel laureates attended. The other attendees were only slightly less celebrated. They included physicist Philip Morrison, who had co-authored a 1959 paper advocating a SETI program just like the one Drake undertook in 1960. A dark-haired and brilliant 27-year-old astronomy postdoc named Carl Sagan was, at the time, the youngest and arguably least distinguished name on the guest list.




A few days before the conference began, Drake tried to categorize the key pieces of information needed to estimate the number, N, of detectable advanced civilizations that might currently exist in our galaxy. Drake reasoned that the average rate of star formation in the Milky Way, R, placed a rough upper limit on the creation of new cradles for cosmic civilizations. Some fraction of those stars, fp, would actually form planets, and some number of those planets, ne, would be suitable for life. Some fraction of those habitable planets, fl, would actually blossom into living worlds, and some fraction of those living worlds, fi, would give birth to intelligent, conscious beings. The fraction of intelligent extraterrestrials that developed technologies that could communicate their existence across interstellar distances was fc, and the average longevity of a technological society was L.




When the conference opened on the morning of Nov. 1, 1961, after the guests were seated and sipping coffee, Drake wrote on a chalkboard: N = R fp ne fl fi fc L




That string of letters has come to be known as the “Drake equation.” Though Drake had intended it only to guide the next three days of the Green Bank meeting, the equation and its plausible values would come to dominate all subsequent SETI discussions and searches. At the meeting, it was the two final and most nebulous terms of Drake’s equation: fc, the fraction of intelligent creatures who would develop societies and technologies capable of interstellar communication, and L, the average longevity of an advanced technological civilization, that caused the most vigorous philosophical debate.







According to Morrison, history suggested that the emergence of technological societies might be a convergent phenomenon. The early civilizations of China, the Middle East, and the Americas all arose independently and generally followed similar lines of development. And yet their paths had ultimately diverged—the drivers of social change and technological progress were not at all clear. Despite China’s development of technologies such as gunpowder, compasses, paper, and the printing press hundreds of years before Europeans did, China experienced nothing equivalent to the colonization of the New World, the European Renaissance, and the successive scientific and industrial revolutions. Whether sending ships across oceans or messages among the stars, a society’s ability to explore and expand appeared to be a matter not only of technological prowess, but also of choice. Whether any particular technological culture would ever attempt something as wild as interstellar communication seemed unpredictable.




The Green Bank attendees eventually guessed that between one-fifth and one-tenth of intelligent species would develop the capabilities and intentions to search for and signal other cosmic civilizations. That left only L, the typical lifetime of technological civilizations, for the group to consider.




Drake suspected that what really controlled the number of technological civilizations living in the cosmos was almost solely their longevity. The thought made Morrison shudder. He had worked on the Manhattan Project during World War II and had witnessed the detonation of the first atomic bomb. Humans had developed a global society, radio telescopes, and interplanetary rockets at roughly the same time as weapons of mass destruction. Perhaps all societies would proceed on similar trajectories, becoming visible to the wider cosmos at roughly the same moment they gained an ability to destroy themselves. In fact, Morrison estimated, if the average civilization endured only a decade before passing into oblivion, at any time there would most likely be only one communicative planetary system throughout the galaxy. One of the most compelling reasons to search for evidence of extraterrestrial civilizations, Morrison thought, would be to learn whether our own had a prayer of surviving its current technological adolescence.




Sagan attempted to counter the doomsaying, noting that we could not rule out some technological civilizations achieving global stability and prosperity either before or even after developing weapons of mass destruction. They might master their planetary environment and move on to exploit resources in the rest of their planetary system. Such a society could, in theory, persist for geological timescales of hundreds of millions or even billions of years, potentially lasting as long as its host star continued to shine. And if, somehow, that civilization managed to escape its dying sun and colonize other planetary systems … well, perhaps then it would endure practically forever. Of all the attendees, Sagan was by far the most optimistic that technological civilizations could solve not only their many planetary problems, but also the manifold difficulties associated with interstellar travel. Somewhere out there, Sagan suggested, immortals passed their unending days amid the stars.




Drake’s best guess in 1961 walked the line between Morrison and Sagan: He speculated that L might be about 10,000 years, and that consequently perhaps 10,000 technological civilizations were scattered throughout the Milky Way along with our own. It was probably not coincidental that Drake’s personal estimate rendered the successful detection of alien civilizations still quite difficult but not entirely beyond our capabilities: By his reckoning, only 10 million stars would need to be monitored to obtain an eventual detection, though the search could take decades, even centuries.




At the conference’s end, as the guests drank Champagne, Otto Struve, the director of Green Bank observatory, offered up a toast: “To the value of L. May it prove to be a very large number.”




Adapted from Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars by Lee Billings with permission of Current, a member of Penguin Group (USA) LLC, A Penguin Random House Company. Copyright © Lee Billings, 2013. Five Billion Years of Solitude is available Oct. 3.





Slate Articles



The Alien-Life Summit

Thursday, September 5, 2013

China backs Russia over Syria at G20 summit


An interior view of the main press centre of the G20 summit is seen in Strelna near St. Petersburg September 4, 2013. REUTERS/Alexander Demianchuk

An interior view of the main press centre of the G20 summit is seen in Strelna near St. Petersburg September 4, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Alexander Demianchuk






ST. PETERSBURG, Russia | Thu Sep 5, 2013 6:32am EDT



ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (Reuters) – China warned on Thursday that military intervention in Syria would hurt the world economy and push up oil prices, reinforcing Vladimir Putin’s attempts to talk U.S. President Barack Obama out of air strikes.


The rift over Syria could overshadow a summit of the Group of 20 (G20) developed and developing economies in St. Petersburg at which global leaders want to forge a united front on growth, trade, banking transparency and fighting tax evasion.


The club that accounts for two thirds of the world’s population and 90 percent of its output is divided over issues such as turmoil in emerging markets and the Federal Reserve’s decision to end its program of stimulus for the U.S. economy.


But no rift is wider than the one between the U.S. and Russian leaders on possible military intervention in Syria to punish President Bashar al-Assad over a chemical weapons attack that killed hundreds of people on August 21.


Putin was isolated on Syria at a Group of Eight meeting in June, the last big meeting of world powers, but now has China to back him at the G20 summit in Russia’s former imperial capital.


“Military action would have a negative impact on the global economy, especially on the oil price – it will cause a hike in the oil price,” Chinese Vice Finance Minister Zhu Guangyao told a briefing before the start of the G20 leaders’ talks.


In Beijing, Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei reiterated that any party resorting to chemical warfare should accept responsibility for it but said unilateral military actions violate international law and would complicate the conflict.


Like Moscow, one of Syria’s main arms suppliers, Beijing has veto powers on the United Nations Security Council. Obama is unlikely to win Security Council approval for military action but is seeking the approval of the U.S. Congress.


France echoed Obama’s call for action over the gas attack, which Washington blames on Syrian government troops and Moscow says may have been carried out by rebels trying to oust Assad.


“The position of France is to punish and negotiate,” Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius told France 2 television before travelling to St. Petersburg, where Putin is hosting the summit in a tsarist palace on the coast.


“We are convinced that if there is no punishment for Mr. Assad, there will be no negotiation,” he added. “Punishment will allow negotiation, but obviously it will be difficult.”


Fabius, whose country is preparing to support the U.S. military action with own forces, said Syria would be discussed at the summit even though it is not formally on the agenda.


Putin has said he would like to hold one-on-one talks with Obama but a Kremlin spokesman said no such meeting was planned. Last month, Obama pulled out of talks with Putin that had been scheduled for Wednesday, and U.S.-Russian ties are in freefall.


Foreign ministers from key states in the G20 – which includes all five permanent U.N. Security Council members – will also discuss Syria on the sidelines of the meeting.


Any G20 decision on Syria would not be binding but Putin would like to see a consensus to avert military action in what would be a significant – but unlikely – personal triumph.


Obama used a visit to Sweden on Wednesday to build his case for a military response, saying: “The international community’s credibility is on the line.” Putin increased the volume as well, accusing Secretary of State John Kerry of “lying” by playing down the role of the militant group al Qaeda with rebel forces.


LOSS OF HARMONY


The G20 achieved unprecedented cooperation between developed and emerging nations to stave off economic collapse during the 2009 financial crisis, but the harmony has now gone.


There are likely to be some agreements – including on measures to fight tax evasion by multinational companies – at the summit in the spectacular, 18th-century Peterhof palace complex, built on the orders of Tsar Peter the Great.


An initiative will be presented to leaders on refining regulation of the $ 630-trillion global market for financial derivatives to prevent a possible markets blow-up.


Steps to give the so-called ‘shadow banking’ sector until 2015 to comply with new global rules will also be discussed.


But consensus is proving hard to achieve among developed economies as the United States takes aggressive action to spur demand and Europe moves more slowly to let go of austerity.


Meanwhile, emerging economies in the BRICS countries – Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa – are divided over the role of the U.S. dollar in the world economy. And there has been no sign of them rallying behind the fifth BRICS member, India, after it called on Friday for joint currency intervention.


Russia and China also joined forces in warning about the potential impact of the Fed ending its bond-buying program to stimulate the economy. Zhu urged the United States to be “mindful of the spillover effects and work to contribute to the stability of the global financial markets and the steady recovery of the global economy”.


The International Monetary Fund will call at the meeting for strengthened global action to revitalize growth and better manage risks, according to an IMF document seen by Reuters.


But with the United States and other advanced economies picking up speed, the IMF said it still expected global growth to accelerate in 2014 from this year, helped by the highly accommodative monetary conditions in the rich world.


Further friction on the fringes of the summit could be caused by Obama’s plans to meet human rights activists including members of a gay rights group which staged protests against a law Putin signed banning “gay propaganda” among children.


(Reporting by Gernot Heller, Luke Baker, Tetsushi Kajimoto, Lidia Kelly, Katya Golubkova, Alessandra Prentice and Denis Dyomkin, and by Ben Blanchard in Beijing; Writing by Timothy Heritage; Editing by Steve Gutterman and Alastair Macdonald)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



China backs Russia over Syria at G20 summit

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Disputes lead Obama to back out of Russian summit







Russian President Vladimir Putin listens during a meeting at the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow on Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2013. The White House announced Wednesday that President Barack Obama has canceled plans to meet with Putin in Moscow next month. The rare diplomatic snub is retribution for Russia’s decision to grant temporary asylum to National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden. It also reflects growing U.S. frustration with Russia on several other issues, including missile defense and human rights. (AP Photo/RIA Novosti, Alexei Nikolsky, Presidential Press Service)





Russian President Vladimir Putin listens during a meeting at the Novo-Ogaryovo residence outside Moscow on Wednesday, Aug. 7, 2013. The White House announced Wednesday that President Barack Obama has canceled plans to meet with Putin in Moscow next month. The rare diplomatic snub is retribution for Russia’s decision to grant temporary asylum to National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden. It also reflects growing U.S. frustration with Russia on several other issues, including missile defense and human rights. (AP Photo/RIA Novosti, Alexei Nikolsky, Presidential Press Service)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — The common ground between the U.S. and Russia — and Presidents Barack Obama and Vladimir Putin — has been shrinking steadily in spite of the much-touted “reset” of relations between the old Cold War foes. And it just got even smaller.


The latest blow to improving relations came Wednesday when Obama, annoyed with Putin’s decision to grant temporary asylum to National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, canceled a face-to-face summit with the Russian leader. While U.S. and Russian foreign and defense ministers will sit down in Washington later this week, Obama won’t be going to Moscow next month.


The Snowden decision was only the final straw in disputes that the White House cited for a lack of “recent progress.” The U.S. and Russia have been at odds over the Syrian civil war, Russia’s domestic crackdown on civil rights, a U.S. missile defense plan for Europe, trade, global security, human rights, even adoptions of Russian children by Americans.


“We looked at the utility of the summit in light of a number of issues and a number of challenges that we’ve encountered and decided that it did not make sense to have that bilateral summit in Moscow in September,” White House press secretary Jay Carney told reporters returning with Obama Wednesday on Air Force One from a trip to California.


Noting that the U.S. and Russia cooperate on other matters, including the supply of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, Carney said the relationship “should not be viewed entirely in a black-and-white fashion.” He added, “Even when we’ve made progress in some areas in our relations with Russia we have continued to encounter disagreement in other areas, and I expect that will be the case going forward.”


The Kremlin responded quickly to the canceled summit, voicing its own disappointment and blaming it on Washington’s inability to develop relations with Moscow on an “equal basis.” Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, added that the decision was “clearly linked” to the Snowden case, a situation that he said wasn’t of Russia’s making.


While Snowden might have been the immediate catalyst for canceling the summit, the seeds of renewed U.S.-Russia discord were planted more than a year ago when Putin regained the Russian presidency. On returning to power, he adopted a deeply nationalistic and more openly confrontational stance toward the United States than had his chosen successor, Dmitry Medvedev, whose 2008-12 tenure roughly overlapped Obama’s first term in the White House.


Where Medvedev abstained in a U.N. Security Council vote that authorized NATO airstrikes in Libya, Putin has refused repeated entreaties from Washington to allow the world body to impose even minimal sanctions on President Bashar Assad’s Syria. At the same time, Putin’s government has continued to supply its ally Assad with weapons. And it has not delivered on pledges to coax Assad into sending representatives to talks with the opposition aimed at finding a political solution to the 2-year-old Syrian conflict.


Obama sought to cultivate Medvedev as a friend of the United States, making significant changes to Bush administration plans for European missile defense to try to ease Russian concerns about that project, signing a new arms control treaty and famously sending then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to meet Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Geneva, where she proclaimed a “reset” in U.S.-Russia relations.


Putin, however, seems to want none of the coziness that a “reset” would bring and has actively sought to undo previous agreements on cooperation. Under Putin, Russia has stepped up its negative rhetoric on missile defense, ended two decades of democracy and civil society training by the U.S. Agency for International Development and banned adoptions of Russian children by Americans.


Andrew Kuchins, a political scientist and expert on Russian politics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said he thinks the reset has been on hold for a while.


“We hit the peak at the end of 2010, and then things started going downhill gradually in 2011,” Kuchins said. “Then, when the announcement was made that Putin was coming back as president in the fall of 2011, the downfall of the reset got a little steeper. “


But he said he does not think that Putin wants to trash the U.S.-Russia relationship and doesn’t think relations are as bad as they were after the Georgia war in the fall of 2008 and 2009. In 2008, Georgia and Russia fought a brief war after Georgia launched an intense artillery barrage on the capital of South Ossetia, and Mikhail Saakashvili, the president of the former Soviet republic, forged a deeper relationship with the U.S.


“That was a pretty dangerous moment for the relationship,” Kuchins said. “Right now, I don’t see such a dangerous moment in the relationship, but we have some fundamental disagreements on nuclear security, missile defense, Syria. I don’t think the Russians are taking positions just to counter us, undermine us. But they have some fundamental differences. They have a different way of looking at some things.”


Ivo Daalder, former U.S. ambassador to NATO and now president of The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, said some positive steps have come from the reset, including Russia’s willingness to help the U.S. transport military materiel in and out of Afghanistan.


“There still is cooperation on areas like Iran, where Russia voted four times in the U.N. Security Council to impose new sanctions,” Daalder said. “There is cooperation on North Korea — Russia has voted for new sanctions. And those are material, positive steps in the relationship that have been the result of the reset.”


But he said that a reset also suggests a future relationship and that despite meetings Vice President Joe Biden, Secretary of State John Kerry and former National Security Adviser Tom Donilon have had with Russian officials, there has been little progress on Syria, nuclear arms reduction and missile defense issues.


In April, Obama asked Donilon to hand-deliver a letter to Putin, proposing new ways to cooperate. Ushakov, Putin’s foreign affairs adviser, said Obama’s letter was “quite constructive” and contained specific proposals regarding arms control and economic cooperation.


But Daalder said Russia’s responses to the letter have been “either nonexistent or negative.”


Putin and Obama last met in June, on the sidelines of the summit of the Group of Eight industrial nations.


Putin said then that he believed the U.S. and Russia had an “opportunity to move forward on most sensitive directions.”


Obama said then that the two nations were poised to increase trade and investment and had pledged to continue to work together to counter potential threats of proliferation and to enhance nuclear security.


“I think this is an example of the kind of constructive, cooperative relationship that moves us out of a Cold War mindset,” Obama said.


That was just seven weeks ago.


On Tuesday, a day before he canceled his meeting with Putin, Obama said on NBC’s “The Tonight Show” that there have been times when the Russians “slip back into Cold War thinking and a Cold War mentality.”


___


AP White House Correspondent Julie Pace contributed to this report.


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Disputes lead Obama to back out of Russian summit

Friday, August 2, 2013

Russia gives Snowden asylum, Obama-Putin summit in doubt




A picture of fugitive former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden in his new refugee documents granted by Russia in Moscow


1 of 6. A picture of fugitive former U.S. spy agency contractor Edward Snowden in his new refugee documents granted by Russia in Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport August 1, 2013, is seen in this still image taken from a video filmed by Rossiya 24 TV Channel.


Credit: Reuters/Rossiya 24/Handout via Reuters






MOSCOW/WASHINGTON | Thu Aug 1, 2013 11:46pm EDT



MOSCOW/WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Russia rejected U.S. pleas and granted American fugitive Edward Snowden a year’s asylum on Thursday, letting the former spy agency contractor slip out of a Moscow airport after more than five weeks in limbo while angering the United States and putting in doubt a planned summit between the two nations’ presidents.


The United States wanted Russia to send Snowden home to face criminal charges including espionage for disclosing in June secret American internet and telephone surveillance programs. The White House signaled that President Barack Obama may boycott a September summit with President Vladimir Putin in Moscow.


Snowden, whose disclosures triggered an international furor over the reach of U.S. spy operations as part of its counterterrorism efforts, thanked Russia for his temporary asylum and declared that “the law is winning.”


Anatoly Kucherena, Snowden’s Russian lawyer, said the 30-year-old had found shelter in a private home of American expatriates.


Putin’s move aggravated relations with the United States that were already strained by Russian support for Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in that country’s bloody civil war and a host of other issues.


“We see this as an unfortunate development and we are extremely disappointed by it,” White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters in Washington. “We are evaluating the utility of a summit, in light of this and other issues, but I have no announcement today on that.


Other high-level U.S.-Russian talks were also put in doubt.


Discussions planned for next week between U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and their Russian counterparts are now “up in the air,” according to a U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.


Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor, has avoided the hordes of reporters trying to find him since he landed at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo airport from Hong Kong on June 23. He gave them the slip again as he left the transit area where he had been holed up.


State television showed Snowden, wearing a backpack and a blue button-up shirt, getting into a gray car at the airport, driven by a young man in a baseball cap.


“Over the past eight weeks we have seen the Obama administration show no respect for international or domestic law but in the end the law is winning,” Snowden, whose first leaks were published two months ago, was quoted as saying by the WikiLeaks anti-secrecy group, which has assisted him.


“I thank the Russian Federation for granting me asylum in accordance with its laws and international obligations.”


Grainy images on state television showed Snowden’s document, which is similar to a Russian passport, and revealed that he had been granted asylum for a year from July 31.


‘MOST WANTED MAN’


“He is the most wanted man on planet Earth,” Kucherena told Reuters.


Kucherena said Snowden wanted to rent an apartment and find work in Russia, and had no immediate plans to leave.


Snowden, who had his U.S. passport revoked by Washington, had bided his time in the transit area between the runway and passport control, which Russia considers neutral territory.


“He needs to work. He is not a rich man, and the money that he had, he has of course, spent on food,” said Kucherena, who sits on two high-profile Russian government advisory bodies.


“Snowden is an expert, a very high-level expert, and I am receiving letters from companies and citizens who would eagerly give him a job. He will not have any problems,” the lawyer said.


Snowden already has been offered a job by Russia’s top social networking site.


A pledge not to publish more information that could harm the United States was the condition under which Putin said Snowden could receive safe harbor. “Edward assured me that he is not planning to publish any documents that blacken the American government,” Kucherena said.


Snowden was accompanied by Sarah Harrison, a WikiLeaks legal researcher. “We would like to thank the Russian people and all those others who have helped to protect Mr. Snowden. We have won the battle – now the war,” WikiLeaks said on Twitter.


“I am so thankful to the Russian nation and President Vladimir Putin,” the American’s father, Lonnie Snowden, told Russian state television.


Bruce Fein, an attorney for Lonnie Snowden, spoke twice on Thursday with Kucherena. The discussions were about Edward Snowden’s safety – “he is fine” – and about arranging a visit to Russia by Snowden’s father and his legal team to see his son, a source familiar with the discussions told Reuters.


Lonnie Snowden has not had direct contact with his son yet and “nobody knows where he (Edward) is,” the source said.


The visit to Russia could occur in the next three weeks or so, the source said.


U.S. LAWMAKERS INCENSED


Prominent U.S. lawmakers – Republicans and Democrats – condemned Russia’s action and urged Obama to take stern retaliatory steps beyond the issue of the September summit.


It is not clear whether Obama might also consider a boycott of the G20 summit in Russia in September, immediately after the planned summit with Putin, or of the Winter Olympics, which Russia will host in the city of Sochi next February.


“Russia has stabbed us in the back, and each day that Mr. Snowden is allowed to roam free is another twist of the knife,” said Senator Chuck Schumer, a close Obama ally and fellow Democrat who urged Obama to recommend moving out of Russia the summit of G20 leaders planned for St. Petersburg.


Republican Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham, already sharp critics of Putin, called Russia’s action a disgrace and a deliberate effort to embarrass the United States. They said the United States should retaliate by pushing for completion of all missile-defense programs in Europe and moving for another expansion of NATO to include Russian neighbor Georgia.


Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov played down concerns about the impact on relations with the United States.


“Our president has … expressed hope many times that this will not affect the character of our relations,” he said.


Snowden hopes to avoid the same fate as Bradley Manning, the U.S. Army soldier convicted on Tuesday on criminal charges including espionage and theft related to releasing classified data through WikiLeaks.


Nicaragua, Bolivia and Venezuela have offered Snowden refuge, but there are no direct commercial flights to Latin America from Moscow and he is concerned the United States would intercept any flight he takes.


Snowden also has received a marriage proposal via Twitter from Anna Chapman, the glamorous former agent who was deported to Russia from the United States in a Cold-War style spy swap in 2010.


Putin has said he wants to improve relations with the United States amid differences over the Syrian civil war, his treatment of political opponents and foreign-funded non-governmental organizations. He would have risked looking weak if he had handed Snowden over to the U.S. authorities.


More than half of Russians have a positive opinion of Snowden and 43 percent wanted him to be granted asylum, a poll released by independent research group Levada said this week.


(Additional reporting by Alissa de Carbonnel, Gabriela Baczynska, Alexei Anishchuk, Katya Golubkova and Gleb Stolyarov in Moscow, Mark Felsenthal and Tabassum Zakaria in Washington, and Andrew Osborn in London, Editing by Will Dunham and Jim Loney)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



Russia gives Snowden asylum, Obama-Putin summit in doubt

Friday, June 28, 2013

RCP Exclusive: Ron Paul to Host Private Weekend Summit



He may be officially retired from public life, but Ron Paul apparently isn’t giving up the reins of the libertarian movement that made him a factor in the last two presidential campaigns and which could play a significant role in the 2016 Republican nominating contest.


RealClearPolitics has learned that the 77-year-old former congressman is hosting an afternoon barbeque Saturday at his home in Lake Jackson, Tex.; the event will function as an informal summit and feature many of the leading figures in the Paul-inspired “liberty movement.”


Hollywood actor Vince Vaughn, who was an active supporter of Paul’s 2008 and 2012 presidential campaigns, is among the invited guests, according to two sources with direct knowledge of planning for the event.


Approximately 100 likeminded organizers and activists are expected to attend the confab, which was organized by Paul’s wife, Carol.


“It’s very much a planned, calculated event,” an invited guest told RCP. “It’s supposedly a meeting of the philosophical leaders and writers of the movement and also the fundraisers — a lot of big donors will come in for it.”


Among the expected attendees are writers and longtime Paul supporters Thomas Woods — who is currently developing lectures for the Ron Paul home-school curriculum — and Jack Hunter, a libertarian radio host who co-authored Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul’s 2011 book, “The Tea Party Goes to Washington.”


The rapidly rising national profile of Paul’s ambitious son, Rand, will be among the major topics of interest during the weekend gathering.


Rand Paul has not been coy about his plans to run for president in 2016, and he is widely expected to be a leading candidate in the Republican field. The freshman senator had originally planned to attend the event at his parents’ home, but a scheduling conflict prohibited him from doing so, according to a source close to the Paul family.


On Friday, Sen. Paul was in South Carolina, where he held meetings and attended fundraisers with activists and officials who will be involved in the state’s first-in-the-South primary.




Scott Conroy is a national political reporter for RealClearPolitics. He can be reached at sconroy@realclearpolitics.com. Follow him on Twitter @RealClearScott.




RealClearPolitics – Articles



RCP Exclusive: Ron Paul to Host Private Weekend Summit