Showing posts with label comes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label comes. Show all posts

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Marriage equality comes to Medicare

President Lyndon B. Johnson signing the Medicare Bill at the Harry S. Truman Library in Independence, Missouri. Former President Harry S. Truman is seated at the table with President Johnson. The following are in the background (from left to right): Senat
Nearly 50 years after LBJ signed Medicare into law, same-sex married couples are now treated equally


More tyrannical despotism good news from the Obama administration:

The Obama administration announced on Thursday that same-sex married couples can qualify for Medicare hospital and physician benefits for the first time.

And something tells me that statements like this from Kathleen Sebelius actually get Republican angrier than the HealthCare.gov SNAFUs from last fall:

“We are working together with SSA to process these requests in a timely manner to ensure all beneficiaries, regardless of sexual orientation, are treated fairly under the law,” U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said in a statement.

In the statement, the Department of Health and Human Services encouraged same-sex couples to visit the Medicare website for more information on how same-sex couples or survivors of same-sex spouses can apply for coverage.



Daily Kos



Marriage equality comes to Medicare

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Venezuela: When Some of the Most Important News Comes in the Form of Corrections

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Venezuela: When Some of the Most Important News Comes in the Form of Corrections

Thursday, March 13, 2014

Here Comes The Wage And Price Controls

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Here Comes The Wage And Price Controls

Here Comes The Wage And Price Controls

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Here Comes The Wage And Price Controls

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Female Masturbation Comes Into Its Own in Pop Music



St Vincent, Cyrus and Minaj don"t fight for the right to pleasure, they just do it and they do it themselves.








Annie Clark, aka St Vincent, surprised fans last December with a new single Birth in Reverse, which featured the line: “Oh what an ordinary day, take out the garbage, masturbate.” Shortly thereafter, a salacious video for Miley Cyrus"s Adore materialised, in which the singer runs a sly hand down her body to signify that she too will procure her own pleasure — a routine she"s also decided to play up on her current Bangerz tour. Not long after Adore appeared online, Nicki Minaj sneaked up on fans by releasinga remix of the song Boss Ass Bitch and from it sprung the words: “It"s a holiday, playing with my pussy day.” Most recently, on Valentine"s Day, Minaj said on her new single Lookin Ass N*gga that she has no use for unworthy men. In none of these instances is masturbation presented as titillating, prurient or provocative. It is normal and routine.


In a carnally confident style akin to Corin Tucker and Carrie Brownstein yowling through Sleater-Kinney"s Let"s Call It Love, or PJ Harvey lasciviously panting, “Lick my legs! I"m on fire!” on Rid of Me, female pleasure in popular music is making a libertine — albeit cooler-headed — return. When female rappers and R&B icons of the 90s and early 00s used this method (Tweet"s Oops Oh My, Janet Jackson"s Take Care and Lil" Kim"s Queen Bitch to name a smutty few), it was a powerful tool which pushed back on the idea that women needed men. But in 2014, the shock value of a woman masturbating — at least as a lyrical device — has at last begun to depreciate. It is no longer an act of flirty deviance to be monetised; it is merely normalised. Sure, Cyrus almost certainly knew the Adore You video would spark a prudish outcry, but it"s still the least flashy thing she"s done of late. Similar is the “DIY” T-shirt Rihanna sported last May, which showed a woman masturbating. With it Rihanna wore a long skirt and a toque. If the point was to be seen, it was also: “And so what?”


While female pleasure in music is nothing new, the shift that has appeared is largely based around an absence of the man: take for example Janet Jackson"s Take Care, where she sings: “I"ll lay here and take care of it "til you come home to me.” For Jackson, masturbation is a bookmark. The Divinyls" I Touch Myself — a pro-masturbation anthem if ever there was one — contains the line: “I"d get down on my knees, I"d do anything for you.” When it came out in 1990 it was intrepid. But the song is just as much about giving pleasure as getting it.


In a 2011 interview with CNN, Kathleen Hanna, feminist leader of Bikini Kill and now the Julie Ruin, questioned the purpose of Katy Perry"s sexual presentation on Perry"s 2008 debut single I Kissed a Girl. “The whole thing is like, "I kissed a girl so my boyfriend could masturbate about it later," said Hanna. “It"s disgusting. It"s exactly every male fantasy of fake lesbian porn.”


Considered alongside a line from the new essay collection by Sonic Youth"s Kim Gordon, “Is It My Body?” — “The body"s not theirs anymore,” she writes of rock stars. “It"s a public domain and public perception” — the discussion over whom a woman"s pleasure serves seems more relevant than ever. A handful of casual references in which pleasure is one"s own are slickly antithetical to any male musician — from Serge Gainsbourg to Skinny Puppy — who ever plunked the sound of a woman moaning into a song for the sake of masculine bravado.


Additionally, the dust finally settling on female masturbation makes room for some gloriously guileful subversion. On Backseat Freestyle, Angel Haze reverses the double standard by laughing pitifully at the male who goes home alone — “Just keep on masturbating,” she says. After that she avows, “Poppin" pussy"s irrelevant.” This is not dissimilar to Lil" Kim"s “a lot of napkins” dig in the opening track of her 1996 debut album Hard Core.


St Vincent, Cyrus and Minaj don"t fight for the right to pleasure, they just do it and they do it themselves. Until this point, most lyrics on the subject of female masturbation have undermined and corrected the illusion that pleasure can"t be DIY. Now the message is that pleasure still exists when pleasure is self-serving.


 

Related Stories


AlterNet.org Main RSS Feed



Female Masturbation Comes Into Its Own in Pop Music

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

When it comes to war, Americans learned their lesson. Even conservatives

A pro-Russian man (not seen) holds a Russian flag behind an armed servicemen on top of a Russian army vehicle outside a Ukrainian border guard post in the Crimean town of Balaclava March 1, 2014. REUTERS/Baz Ratner
Not our problem to solve.


Good.

The latest research from YouGov shows that the American public has little appetite for any involvement in Ukraine. Asked whether the international community as a whole has a responsibility to get involved in resolving the situation in Ukraine, less than a third of Americans (30%) think that what is going on in Ukraine is the world’s business [...]

Support for any US intervention to defend Ukraine against a Russian invasion is even lower. Only 18% say that the US has any responsibility to protect Ukraine, while 46% say that the US does not. Support for helping to protect Ukraine is higher among Republicans (26%) than among Democrats (13%) but just under half of both groups say that the US has no responsibility to defend Ukraine.



Neocons are desperate to reignite the Cold War, while other Republicans just want an excuse to attack the president, once a calculating dictator, now a feckless appeaser (consistency is not their strong suit). The punditry is giddy with idiot proclamations like “biggest test of Obama’s presidency” because it’s March and they’d be otherwise bored.  

The reality is that this is an unfortunate flareup in a part of the world that is only tangentially relevant to US interests. And it concerns a nuclear superpower over which the United States has little direct influence. Think about it—conservatives gush over Putin’s “leadership” because he doesn’t take shit from anyone and wrestles bears! So if that’s the case, why would Putin listen to Obama? And what is Obama supposed to do, issue military threats it can’t back up, try to wield moral authority our nation lost in Iraq? Should he challenge Putin to a wrestling match?


Luckily, the American people are smarter than the idiot pundits and blood-crazed conservatives. This isn’t our problem. We are not the world’s policemen. And the last decade of war has clearly stripped the American people of any new warlust.




Daily Kos



When it comes to war, Americans learned their lesson. Even conservatives

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Ellen Page Comes Out As Gay – “I’m Tired of Hiding” She Shares A Powerful Message

In her speech at the Time to Thrive conference Friday, actress Ellen Page came out as gay. This was a big moment for the 26-year-old as her speech will not only make others more empowered but it’s ultimately a big step in her own journey as well.


“I’m here today because I am gay. I am tired of hiding and I am tired of lying by omission,” Page said. “I suffered for years because I was scared to be out. My spirit suffered, my mental health suffered and my relationships suffered. And I’m standing here today, with all of you, on the other side of all that pain.”



Ellen’s speech contains several powerful messages regarding how we view each other and how we could create a world that would be a lot more loving and peaceful for everyone. It is so awesome to see such a huge increase in powerful events taking place in all areas of our social paradigm as it is clear a shift is taking place amongst humanity in our consciousness/how we view our world.



Collective-Evolution



Ellen Page Comes Out As Gay – “I’m Tired of Hiding” She Shares A Powerful Message

Wednesday, February 12, 2014

Study finds global warming ‘pause’ comes from unusual Pacific Ocean trade winds


By The Guardian
Sunday, February 9, 2014 19:43 EST


A serene beach in Kiribati, which may soon vanish beneath the waves due to rising ocean levels. Screenshot via YouTube.


GUARDIAN NEWS SERVICE


A429291155


Oliver Milman, The Guardian


The contentious “pause” in global warming over the past decade is largely due to unusually strong trade winds in the Pacific ocean that have buried surface heat deep underwater, new research has found.


A joint Australian and US study analysed why the rise in the Earth’s global average surface temperature has slowed since 2001, after rapidly increasing from the 1970s.


The research shows that sharply accelerating trade winds in central and eastern areas of the Pacific have driven warm surface water to the ocean’s depths, reducing the amount of heat that flows into the atmosphere.


In turn, the lowering of sea surface temperatures in the Pacific triggers further cooling in other regions.


The study, which is published in the journal Nature Climate Change, calculated the net cooling effect on global average surface temperatures as between 0.1C and 0.2C (32.2F and 32.4F), accounting for much of the hiatus in surface warming. The study’s authors said there has been a 0.2C gap between models used to predict warming and actual observed warming since 2001.


The findings should provide fresh certainty about the reasons behind the warming hiatus, which has been claimed by critics of mainstream climate science as evidence that the models are flawed and predictions of rising temperatures have been exaggerated.


The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) addressed the warming pause issue in its 2013 climate report, pointing out that the Earth is going through a solar minimum and that more than 90% of the world’s extra heat is being soaked up by the oceans, rather than lingering on the surface.


Matthew England, a climate scientist at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, and leader of the research, said that while the solar minimum and aerosol particles have contributed to the slowdown, strong trade winds are the significant factor.


“Temperature models have an envelope of uncertainty but it is clear that the last decade has seen a much flatter temperature change compared to the 1980s and 1990s, when the increase was rapid,” he said.


“We found that the wind acceleration has been strong enough in the past 20 years to pump a lot of the heat into the ocean. Winds accelerated in this period more than at any time in the past century; it really is unprecedented and the models haven’t captured it all.”


The acceleration of Pacific trade winds has been twice as strong in the past 20 years compared with the prior 80 years, cooling the east Pacific and propagating the trend to other parts of the world.


The study suggests the warming hiatus could continue for much of the present decade if the trade winds continue; however, should the winds return to their long-term average speeds, rapid warming will resume.


“Even if the winds accelerate even further, sooner or later the impact of greenhouse gases will overwhelm the effect,” England said. “And if the winds relax, the heat will come out quickly. As we go through the 21st century, we are less and less likely to have a cooler decade. Greenhouse gases will certainly win out in the end.”


England said it was unclear what has caused the increase in Pacific trade winds, although warming in the Indian Ocean has been cited as a potential trigger.


Dr Steve Rintoul, research team leader at CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, said the research shows that pauses in the rate of global warming are to be expected.


“The oceans have continued to warm unabated, even during the recent hiatus in warming of surface temperature,” he said.


“Natural variations of the climate system also mean that climate trends estimated over a short period are unlikely to reflect long-term changes. A decade or two of slower or faster warming does not tell us anything about long-term climate change.”


Richard Allan, professor of climate science at the University of Reading, said it is likely the current warming slowdown is only a temporary reprieve from brisk increases in global temperatures.


“This new research suggests that when the trade winds weaken again, the planet can expect rapid warming of the surface to resume, as greenhouse gas concentrations continue to rise,” he said.


“We don’t know what is causing these unprecedented changes, but the implications could be substantial.”


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2014




The Raw Story



Study finds global warming ‘pause’ comes from unusual Pacific Ocean trade winds

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Rick Perry Comes Out In Favor Of Marijuana Decriminalization


Catherine Thompson
talkingpointsmemo.com
January 23, 2014


Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) said Thursday that he’s open to marijuana decriminalization in the Lone Star state.


“As governor, I have begun to implement policies that start us toward a decriminalization,” Perry said at a World Economic Forum panel on drug legalization in Davos, Switzerland, according to the San Antonio Express-News. He was referring to “drug courts” in the state that provide treatment and softer penalties for minor offenses.


A Perry spokeswoman confirmed to the Express-News that while Perry is opposed to legalization of the drug because of medical issues, the governor supports policies that lower punishments for marijuana use in order to keep smokers out of jail.


Read more


This article was posted: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 1:57 pm










Infowars



Rick Perry Comes Out In Favor Of Marijuana Decriminalization

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Boston Bombing Victim Who Lost His Legs Comes Forward with Story

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Boston Bombing Victim Who Lost His Legs Comes Forward with Story

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

(Video)10 year old British girl explains to her Teddy where money really comes from, & it ain"t the Bank of England

(Video)10 year old British girl explains to her Teddy where money really comes from, & it ain"t the Bank of England
http://isbigbrotherwatchingyou.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/a74b8__gun_ban__debt.png


Positive Money is a movement to democratise money and banking so that it works for society and not against it.


Our current financial system has left us with the highest personal debt in history, unaffordable housing, worsening inequality, high unemployment and banks that are subsidised and underwritten with taxpayers’ money. We believe that these problems have a common root: money.




Many of the big social and economic problems that we’re facing today are connected to money. If we want to solve these problems, we have to change the way that money is created. Most of us learn that only the government can create money, but in reality more than 97% of money is created by private banks – the same banks you see on the high-street every day.


The money banks create isn’t the paper money you keep in your wallet. It’s the electronic money that flashes up when you check your balance at an ATM. Find out How Banks Create Money…





Banks create this electronic money whenever they make a loan. That means for every pound in your bank account, someone else must have a pound of debt. The authorities find it very difficult to limit how much money – and debt – that banks can create. As a result personal debt is now higher than ever before.


MORE: Why is there so much debt?










Since almost all of our money is ‘on loan’ from banks, someone must pay interest on nearly every pound in the UK. This interest redistributes money from the bottom 90% of the population to the top 10%. The money banks create also pushes up house prices, and blows up bubbles in financial markets – making the very rich even richer.


MORE: Why are the rich getting richer?










House prices have been pushed up and out of reach by the hundreds of billions of pounds of new money that banks created in the years before the financial crisis. It’s not just that there’s too many people and not enough houses..


MORE: Why are house prices so high?









WHAT REALLY HAPPENED




Read more about (Video)10 year old British girl explains to her Teddy where money really comes from, & it ain"t the Bank of England and other interesting subjects concerning Police State at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Maddow: After Everything, GOP Comes Up Empty


Luke Russert, NBC News Capitol Hill correspondent, talks with Rachel Maddow about the likelihood of another shutdown crisis in Congress in the future. Next, Rachel gives a concise review of just how badly Republicans lost this month.




RealClearPolitics Video Log



Maddow: After Everything, GOP Comes Up Empty

Sunday, October 6, 2013

The Devil Comes Home to Cal State Northridge


I have received a number of communiqués asking me to take a position on David Klein, a fellow CSU Northridge professor who finds himself in hot water with Jewish anti-defamation groups.  He uses university resources to showcase the movement to boycott and sanction Israel.


Why would my opinion matter?  Well, our controversies have a few faint parallels:  he is Jewish and criticizes Israel, while I am bisexual and oppose same-sex parenting.  We hold unpopular opinions and look like traitors to our own communities.


Some people want me to justify my continued employment at Northridge, given that fellow conservatives are calling for Klein to be punished.  Others want me to defend Klein’s freedom of speech, given that Provost Harry Hellenbrand has been truly stellar at protecting my academic freedom — it is because of Harry that I still have a job.


I’ll get to all that after I tell you a tale, Hawthorne-style.


Remember the gullible Puritan?


A classic Hawthorne short story is “Young Goodman Brown,” in which a Puritan sets out one night, still a hopeful newlywed, but comes back a ruined man.  He ventures into the forest late at night.  He sees all the people from town worship the Devil.


“With excellent resolve for the future,” Brown sets out while the sun is setting.  But the text shows a different man entirely by the tale’s end:


Be it so if you will; but, alas! it was a dream of evil omen for young Goodman Brown. A stern, a sad, a darkly meditative, a distrustful, if not a desperate man did he become from the night of that fearful dream. On the Sabbath day, when the congregation were singing a holy psalm, he could not listen because an anthem of sin rushed loudly upon his ear and drowned all the blessed strain.



What he sees breaks his faith forever.


Call me Ishmael…on second thought, call me Middle-Aged Goodman Brown


In 2008, I drove a U-Haul 2,549 miles from Buffalo to Los Angeles, to begin a professorship at Cal State Northridge, in the department of English.  As I rolled through the gorgeous red canyons of Utah, I was the most pitiable of all things: a believer.


Perhaps I was lulled too much by university websites, always plugging lecture series, roundtables, and grants.  I thought that the gospel of academic freedom was real, and professors could pursue truth without censorship.  I thought the CSU was going to protect the free exchange of ideas.


In very little time, unfortunately, I saw the witching hour.


I was not even finished moving into my office when Obama’s face was plastered everywhere.  It was election 2008; for me, the season in Hell.  At the mere mention of Sarah Palin’s name, seven colleagues at a table literally foamed at the mouth and moaned that only someone mentally retarded could respect such a “self-loathing bimbo.”


I’m like Goodman Brown, only I called the Devil out


I confessed that I admired Palin to a colleague, and he immediately compared me to Hitler.


Afterwards, strange things began to happen.  People became rude during cursory social interactions.  Application after application for course release, teaching support, and other benefits came back rejected.  Everything I sent to the department newsletter vanished into cyberspace.  I couldn’t get on committees, I was summarily removed from faculty groups like the Center for Sex and Gender Research, and I received bizarre communications at the rate of about one per week, which began with “it has come to my attention” and ended with some threat to punish me for the slightest deviation from the most picayune and arcane university regulations.


Within fourteen months of starting the job, I’d been hectored directly at a department retreat and denounced on the faculty listserv.  A trio whom I’ll call the Marxist Brothers — one devoted to a lifelong crusade against the ghost of McCarthy, another obsessed with African-American literature, and another the darling who compared me to Hitler — started having closed-door meetings with my chair, and the fun began.


Suddenly one of the Marxist Brothers unveiled a play about a Puerto Rican academic who narrowly avoided being jobless in budget cuts by working in intelligence and going to Afghanistan.  The dean assured me that this was purely a coincidence and couldn’t have anything to do with me — the only Puerto Rican in the department, the only person working in intelligence, and, as the college’s only faculty reservist, the only one facing deployment to Afghanistan.  I was expected to take it in stride when the reading of this unwritten play was unexpectedly scheduled for nine days before a symposium I had organized on campus about gender and national security.


Friendly outreach to Gender Studies and Queer Studies was of course met with hostility and denunciations, even recriminations.  I received threatening e-mails two days before the symposium, and a few days after the Fort Hood shooting, but the university police denied my requests for help because they felt that Fort Hood was a freak occurrence with little connection to a conference on campus that had been denounced, protested, and sabotaged by students and faculty, to which a host of military and intelligence professionals were invited.


By my third year on the job, I’d had people carve threatening lines over the Army stickers on my door, tear my American flag, and throw flyers at me.  Still no luck with the department newsletter, although it was useful to know each time the Marxist Brothers had an interview with local media (no promo is too big or too small!), published a poem on a former student’s blog, or chaired a roundtable.  It was made clear to me that I was not allowed to use university resources for anything political.  Such was the law, they said.


My colleagues could invite keynote speakers from Code Pink, host conferences called “Queering Religion,” advise the Young Democrats in the midst of campaigns, offer Marxist courses like “the Social Gospel” or “the African American Left,” and found whole departments based on “social justice,” but none of these were seen as violating Cal State’s code about using state resources to advance a political agenda.  The most recent university-wide awards went to the Marxist Brother who wrote the anti-war play and another literature professor who wrote a book claiming that John Milton was an atheist.


By contrast, anything I did, on the job or off, that alluded remotely to my not being a leftist counted as political and was therefore grounds for complaint and possible sanction.  I brought Shirley Jones and Mickey Rooney to campus using a small grant that I got outside Northridge, and these events were never posted on the university homepage calendar of events, no matter how many times I sent the press releases to the appropriate offices.  Instead, on the CSUN homepage, I’ve seen video clips defending same-sex marriage and reports of an art professor who built tiny replicas of Wall Street and set fire to them in celebration of Occupy.


The Marxist Brothers, along with potentially hundreds of nameless others who may have been behind the constant stream of “it has come to my attention” messages, complained about things on my Facebook page, tweets, blogs hosted on blogspot, listserv postings, private e-mails, conversations with students, conversations with colleagues — with the hint that because I was an employee of Cal State Northridge, I might be violating California state law.


By my fourth year on the job, I had lawyers.  I’d been accused of things (and found innocent, of course) by the feminists, the Latinos, the pacifists, and of course, who can forget the gays?  I was still receiving the weekly “it has come to my attention” e-mails.  By my fifth year, there were online petitions against me and national campaigns by gay rights organizations that pressured Northridge to take action against me.  My e-mail account was subject to a public records act request.  All communications with my dean, chair, or other university official were being screened by counsel, and I was avoiding campus for fear of being stabbed, shot, stuck in an elevator with the Marxist Brothers, or stalked by a Central American Studies professor who had goaded people to film me being “racist” for YouTube.


By the end of my fifth year, I had been tear-gassed in Paris and attacked by a mob in Brussels.  Gay activists had gotten me on GLAAD’s blacklist and Google-bombed my name and place of business.  Pressure from gay activists who knew where I worked forced a French university to bar me from presenting at a conference.  Members of my own family had been approached and pressured to denounce me publicly.  I trusted nobody, taught online classes as much as possible, never used university e-mail, did no business with the bookstore, made no applications for grants, and almost never publicized my affiliation with California State Northridge.  Having cultivated a following in England and France, I advocated for children’s rights elsewhere and thought of nearly anything dealing with Northridge as a waste of my time.


Essentially, I am a ruined man, like Goodman Brown.


What do I think about David Klein?


Those who wish to compare my case to his are engaging in a false equivalency.  I knew the Devil and called his bluff years ago.  The perennial pitfall of those on the left is that they make deals with the Devil, to give indulgences to themselves that they deny to rightists.  Then, when the Devil asks for his due, they don’t have much to say.


Professor Klein was one of the faculty who protested against my symposium on gender and national security in November 2009 and incited a cohort of students to come and harass people.  I respect his right to do this, but I suspect that such behavior from me would have ended in my dismissal the next day.  I had to adhere to an almost unattainable standard of purity from day one, to avoid being not only fired, but possibly assaulted.  I don’t think Professor Klein ever worked under such legal stricture.


To be marginalized on campus because you are on the far right is very different from being marginalized because you are on the far left.  When you are on the far left, there are still natural allies on campus — just enough to make you feel entitled.


Professor Klein insisted on using a university website to present information about his views on Israel.  He is a math professor, academically more removed from his activism than I am from same-sex parenting.  Yet I never used university resources to promote discussion of same-sex parenting.


I regret that people at Cal State Northridge must be subjected to so much stress and conflict over Professor Klein’s viewpoints.  I am grateful to Harry Hellenbrand, the provost, for protecting me from what was probably one of the most vicious backlashes survived by any professor alive today.  Cognizant of how lucky I am to have received tenure, I do support Klein’s right to free speech and think he should be able to use university servers as he sees fit, because the state of California pays us very little for the work we do, and in my mind, he has earned the right to use those resources.  But I reject the analogy of my situation to his.


Mostly, I mourn for the campus’s lost innocence.  Salem has been begging for the Devil to appear since as long as I’ve been there, and he’s come home.  I sleep with a clear conscience.


Robert Oscar Lopez edits English Manif.  The views expressed here are his and do not reflect the official position of Cal State Northridge.




American Thinker



The Devil Comes Home to Cal State Northridge

Sunday, September 22, 2013

When it comes to addict-TV we want a mash-up, not a repeat | Michael Moran


The success of Breaking Bad and The Walking Dead will be diluted by spin-offs: how about a hybrid of the two?


Breaking Bad is incontestably the most talked-about TV show of 2013. The show is superbly written, beautifully acted, and has the added “in crowd” cachet of premiering its final season on subscription service Netflix. It was already immensely addictive and now it’s a little harder to come by. It’s almost like … I don’t know … methamphetamine?


But from the opening moments of the first series, in which we see schoolteacher Walter White sucked into the world of crystal meth, the end of the journey was in sight. In terms of pure realism it’s a miracle he made it to the end of the second series. Where will Breaking Bad junkies go when it’s all over? Tapering off with The Great British Bake Off doesn’t seem like a realistic option.


Luckily AMC, the US network behind Breaking Bad, has commissioned Walter and Jesse’s creators – Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould – to write a new spin-off show called Better Call Saul. It focuses on amoral – well, more-amoral-than-average – lawyer Saul Goodman.


The series will begin, according to the press release, with a “one-hour prequel that will focus on the evolution of the popular Saul Goodman character before he ever became Walter White’s lawyer”. I find Saul one of the funnier elements of the Breaking Bad recipe. I hope comedy’s at the fore of Better Call Saul.


I like Breaking Bad. I’m pleased at the prospect of more stories from the same world. I also rather like The Walking Dead, another AMC show set in the aftermath of one of those zombie apocalypses we hear so much about. There are more stories to come from that world too.


Like its parent, the new (as yet untitled) Walking Dead show will follow the fortunes of a ragtag band of survivors trying to cope in a post-apocalyptic zombie nightmare but – crucially – they’ll be a different ragtag band of survivors than the ones we know and love. A band not led by Egg from This Life.


It’s hard to see what the writers will find to distinguish this new The Walking Dead series from its parent. It couldn’t be substantially grimmer or more visceral than the original show. Perhaps they’ll lighten it up. There’s definitely a shortage of zombie-themed musical comedies on TV right now.


Taking a step further down the genre-TV food chain, superhero show Arrow is spawning a spin-off too. Arrow takes the bearded, left-leaning DC Comics archery expert Green Arrow and reinvents him as a hip metrosexual nightclub owner. The spin-off, due this year, will feature Green Arrow’s fast-moving Justice League colleague The Flash. There was a Flash show once before, in that purple patch of superheroism that followed the success of the Tim Burton Batman films. It was perfectly fine. Hardly anybody watched it. Perhaps this Flash will be different. He’ll definitely have more defined abs.


Spin-offs are by no means a new idea. Successful TV shows, especially sitcoms, have been budding new properties since the days when people still knew what The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet was about. Even BBC2′s chin-stroking arts roundtable The Late Show reproduced by binary fission, spawning the more populist and much longer-lived Jools Holland Later series.


But there’s clearly something in the air at the moment. A little flurry of mitosis in the TV schedules. Networks, at least in the US, are determined to give us more of what we already like. They should proceed with caution though. There are two Joeys to every Frasier.


If I could make a constructive suggestion, rather than just carping from the sidelines, it would be this. Instead of making new comedies from existing comedies, or new dramas from the ones we already have, programme-makers should take a leaf out of hip-hop’s book.


Mashing up two shows is more creative than just extending one. Bring back a beloved deceased character from Breaking Bad (mentioning no names) and send them shambling across New Mexico in a search for human flesh. Or just commission a drug-themed cookery show featuring Mary Berry and Paul Hollywood cooking up meth in a nice tent in the home counties.


Because yes, we do want more of the stuff we already like. But we crave novelty too. And we’re always looking for a bigger, more exhilarating rush than last time.





theguardian.com © 2013 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved. | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds









Comment is free | theguardian.com

When it comes to addict-TV we want a mash-up, not a repeat | Michael Moran

Friday, September 13, 2013

Stimulus II: The Best Case for an Economic Sequel Actually Comes from Hollywood


Wikimedia Commons

It might not make up for R.I.P.D. (it’s Men-in-Black … with ghosts!), but Hollywood has done something worthwhile lately. It’s reduced our debt burden. 


Now, remember, it’s not the size of our debt that matters. It’s the size of our debt compared to our income — our GDP. And even that really only matters insofar as lenders think it does. Semi-mythical bond vigilantes might revolt over higher debt levels, and demand higher interest rates. Or they might just be the bogeymen of James Carville’s imagination. There are plenty of countries that have run up big debt-to-GDP ratios without paying more to borrow — and sometimes less. That’s what happens when the economy slumps, and there’s a flight to safety. Japan, of course, has borrowed more than 200 percent of its GDP during its lost decade and a half, but its 10-year borrowing costs have tumbled to 0.73 percent. Now, higher debt levels are associated with lower growth, but, as Reinhart and Rogoff’s L’Affaire Excel reminds us, it’s only that — an association. It isn’t clear which way the causation runs. And no, there aren’t any magic red debt lines either.


So what does this have to do with Hollywood? Well, the Bureau of Economic Analysis recently revised how it calculates GDP to include intangible things like R&D spending and movie or television royalties. Add it all up, and our GDP is actually 3 percent bigger than we previously thought it was. Woohoo.


Of course, higher GDP means a lower debt-to-GDP ratio. As you can see in the chart below from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, our debt burden is about 2.5 percentage points lower than we thought it was before — 72.5, and not 75, percent. (Compare the red and orange lines).



Who cares? No really, who cares? Markets certainly don’t. It’s not as if a little lower debt-to-GDP ratio has made us any more creditworthy. After all, our long-term budget outlook hasn’t changed any. Our debt has just shifted down a bit.


And that’s kind of a profound point. Think about it in reverse. If a one-time downshift in our debt hasn’t made us any more creditworthy, then a one-time upshift in our debt won’t make us any less creditworthy either. And what’s a one-time upshift in our debt? A stimulus. As Paul Krugman points out, the 2009 stimulus wasn’t a temporary program that became permanent — it faded away too soon and too fast.  And a new stimulus would eventually fade away too. Okay, but would another couple percentage points of GDP of stimulus really matter? Yes, very much so. Krugman’s back-of-the-envelope calculation is that filling the output gap would only add about 4 percentage points to our debt-to-GDP ratio — while hopefully keeping the long-term unemployed from becoming unemployable, and making the investments we need today to keep growing tomorrow. Not bad for something that would only slightly increase our interest payments today, but not the market’s fears of our fiscal tomorrow.


For once, Hollywood isn’t making a sequel. It’s showing us that we should — a new stimulus. 


That’d be waaay better than R.I.P.D. 2.


 






    








Master Feed : The Atlantic



Stimulus II: The Best Case for an Economic Sequel Actually Comes from Hollywood

Sunday, September 8, 2013

When It Comes to Health, Not All Fruit Created Equal


(Newser) – If you’re worried about diabetes, you might want to stock up on blueberries and ditch the fruit juice. That’s the upshot of a new study in the British Medical Journal that tracked the eating habits of 180,000 subjects over nearly 30 years. The simplified findings: Those who ate five servings of whole blueberries a week had a 26% lower risk of contracting type 2 diabetes, reports the New York Times. Grapes and apples also did well, followed by prunes, pears, bananas, and grapefruit. Other fruits didn’t seem to have much of an effect in terms of diabetes.


One striking part of the study is that fruit juice might actually raise the risk for the disease, notes National Geographic. That’s probably in part because dietary fiber and nutrients are lost in the juicing process, explains Bloomberg. So are blueberries a silver bullet? Not even close. “We don’t want to leave the impression that there’s any magical fruit,” says a co-author of the study, per the Boston Globe. And, he adds, no amount of blueberries in the world will compensate for things like a lack of exercise, an otherwise lousy diet, or a pack of smokes. (A previous study suggested blueberries also helped ward off dementia.)




Health from Newser



When It Comes to Health, Not All Fruit Created Equal

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Musician, Author Ricky Skaggs: A Bluegrass Life Comes Full Circle

Despite the accolades and joys of a career in bluegrass music spanning nearly five decades, Ricky Skaggs tells Newsmax TV that one of his toughest moments was in 1986 when he saw his 7-year-old son in a Virginia hospital with a gunshot wound to the face from a road rage incident.

“That was one of the hardest times in my life,” Skaggs, now 59, tells Newsmax in an exclusive interview. “I thought my world had just come to an end.”


“I just thought at first when his mother, my ex-wife, called to let me know about the accident, I thought it was like a family shooting or something like that — an accidental thing, like they were out hunting. But when I found out it was a road rage-kind of shooting, oh man, it just freaked me out.”


Story continues below video.



“I caught a plane, flew to Roanoke, Va., and spent hours and days there with him,” Skaggs says. “But just seeing my son in the hospital with a bullet hole right here at his face, that was one of the hardest things I’d ever gone through in my life. But thank God, he came through it.”


His son, Andrew Lee Skaggs, is now 35 and has two children. “I’m so proud of him,” his father says.


Ricky Skaggs, whose primary instrument is the mandolin, is the author of the widely anticipated memoir “Kentucky Traveler: My Life in Music,” with music journalist Eddie Dean. In it, he recalls the importance of bluegrass and the mandolin on his childhood, to a full career as a popular country musician, and the eventual journey back to the bluegrass of his youth. But he’s not slowing down.


A live CD with singer and keyboardist Bruce Hornsby is scheduled to be released next week, and the pair will be on tour later this year.


Born in Cordell, Ky., Skaggs started playing music at age 5 after his father, Hobert, gave him a mandolin. The next year, he played mandolin and sang on stage with country legend Bill Monroe — and at age 7, he appeared on television playing with Lester Flatt and Earl Scruggs.


He wanted to audition for the Grand Ole Opry in Nashville but was told he was too young.


In his mid-teens, Skaggs met a fellow teen prodigy, guitarist Keith Whitley, and they started playing together with Whitley’s banjo-playing brother, Dwight, on radio shows. By 1970, they had earned a spot opening for Ralph Stanley, who invited Skaggs and Whitley to join his band, the Clinch Mountain Boys.


Skaggs later joined The Country Gentlemen in Washington and played with J.D. Crowe’s New South. He also played with Emmylou Harris’ Hot Band and wrote arrangements for her 1980 bluegrass-roots album, “Roses in the Snow.” He also sang harmony and played mandolin and fiddle in the Hot Band.


Skaggs has received 14 Grammy awards and seven Country Music Association awards. He also has been honored for his music by the International Bluegrass Music Association.
In 2008, Skaggs recorded a bluegrass version of “Old Enough” by the Raconteurs with Ashley Monroe and the Raconteurs. He played mandolin and shared vocals with Monroe, Jack White, and Brendan Benson.


He says in his book that his collaboration with White was one of those “staying open to God moments.”


“If we’re just open to God’s direction in our life, he’ll take us places that we never dreamed that we’d get a chance to go to, and I’ve always been real open about my faith. I’ve always been open about music. Music is just a great way to express my faith, and I love being able to do collaborations with people.”


Skaggs, who’s been married since 1981 to Sharon White of The Whites country music group — they have a daughter and a son — tells Newsmax that he is even more heartened to see the bluegrass tradition being carried on and expanded by such groups as Mumford & Sons and the Abbott Brothers.


“They are really taking the music to a completely different audience. It’s very rewarding,” he says. “When I see a banjo up there, even right along with their kick drum, there’s something cool about that.


“I started playing bluegrass when I was just a kid,” Skaggs adds. “Then I went into more commercial country music, but I always tried to bring my bluegrass sound even to country music, and that’s one of the things that made me successful in the early ’80s, was trying to bring and bridge those two music genres.


“Really, bluegrass music and traditional music are the oldest pure forms, and even today they are some of the most pure forms of country music.”


And even though modern country music is far different from the tunes he played growing up in Kentucky, Skaggs says “music has got to always develop and always keep pushing boundaries.


“I try to do the same thing with the bluegrass music — but these kids, they’re very respectful when I’m around.


“When I see Keith Urban at the Grand Ole Opry, he comes up and says, ‘Man, I love you. You’re a great inspiration to me, your early records.’ That good seed fell on good soil somewhere in my career, and it makes me feel good to see that these people are out playing good music, but that they’re also paying tribute and honoring the past and honoring people that inspired people.


“I’ve always been about that with Bill Monroe, Flatt and Scruggs, and the Stanley Brothers,” Skaggs adds. “I’ve always tried to pay tribute and pay honor to those guys.”


© 2013 Newsmax. All rights reserved.




Newsmax – America



Musician, Author Ricky Skaggs: A Bluegrass Life Comes Full Circle

Sunday, July 14, 2013

The Game of Change Comes to the White House





Today, President Obama met with members of the 1963 Loyola University Chicago Ramblers championship team, and celebrated the 50th anniversary of their Division I basketball title.


President Barack Obama greets members of the 1963 Loyola University Chicago Ramblers.

President Barack Obama greets members of the 1963 Loyola University Chicago Ramblers NCAA Championship men’s basketball team in the Oval Office, July 11, 2013. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)



On March 15, 1963, the Ramblers played Mississippi State in a regional semifinal game known as the Game of Change.


The year: 1963, right in the midst of the Civil Rights movement. The team: The Loyola Ramblers, coached by George Ireland. The controversy: The Ramblers started four African-American players on the “Iron Five” lineup, even though the unwritten rules of college basketball allowed only two African-American players to start, and an unwritten law in Mississippi wouldn’t allow play against integrated teams.


Earlier in the year, the Ramblers had won 20 consecutive games and earned a tournament berth. The Game of Change took place in East Lansing, Michigan. The all-white Mississippi State team snuck into Michigan in defiance of an injunction issued by the Governor of Mississippi that was intended to prohibit the game.  


Judy Van Dyck, the daughter of the Head Coach, George Ireland, accompanied the team today. She told me that she remembered her father saying, with tears in his eyes, that the time had come for change, that these were his kids, and he wanted to make a difference so that no other kids would have to go through what they went through.


And that’s just what happened.


The Ramblers won 61-51. Before tip-off, photographers captured one of the great moments in college sports history when Loyola captain Jerry Harkness, and Mississippi State captain Joe Dan Gold shook hands at center court. The team gave President Obama a framed copy of that famous photo today.


The Ramblers went on to eventually win the 1963 NCAA Championship, by beating the Cincinnati Bearcats in overtime, 60-58, denying the Bearcats their third consecutive national title.


All nine players from the 1963 Ramblers graduated from Loyola, and many went on to excel in graduate studies. And this November, the Ramblers will become the first team to be inducted into the National Collegiate Basketball Hall of Fame.


Their induction coincides with several major 50th year anniversaries of the Civil Rights movement—from the murder of Medgar Evers, to the bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church, to the Children’s March, to the Stand in the Schoolhouse Door in Alabama, to the March on Washington and Reverend Martin Luther King Jr.’s “I Have a Dream” speech.


The Ramblers broke barriers by refusing to give in to prejudice, and simply playing their best. As I watched President Obama speak with the players in the Oval Office, I thought of just how far we’ve come.


In 1963, a governor refused to let them play. But today, a President welcomed them to the White House with open arms.


Valerie B. Jarrett is a Senior Advisor to President Barack Obama. She oversees the Offices of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs.




White House.gov Blog Feed



The Game of Change Comes to the White House