Showing posts with label Coalition. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Coalition. Show all posts

Thursday, January 9, 2014

What groups or organizations comprise the National Coalition for the Homeless?

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


What groups or organizations comprise the National Coalition for the Homeless?

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Coalition for the Homeless - Grand Central Food Program

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


Coalition for the Homeless - Grand Central Food Program

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

HOLIDAYS - National Coalition for the Homeless

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


HOLIDAYS - National Coalition for the Homeless

Sunday, November 24, 2013

German parties edge warily towards "grand coalition" deal




BERLIN Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:26pm EST



Representatives of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and representatives of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and of the Christian Social Union (CSU) attend coalition talks at the CDU headquarters in Berlin, November 21, 2013. REUTERS/Thomas Peter

Representatives of the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and representatives of the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and of the Christian Social Union (CSU) attend coalition talks at the CDU headquarters in Berlin, November 21, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Thomas Peter




BERLIN (Reuters) – Angela Merkel’s conservatives and the Social Democrats (SPD) head into a decisive week of German coalition talks on track to form a government but under fire from their own members for a series of policy compromises.


The chancellor’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU) beat the SPD in an election two months ago, but failed to secure a parliamentary majority, forcing her into talks with her arch-rivals.


Negotiations have dragged on, leaving Merkel’s outgoing center-right coalition in charge but unable to move on urgent European policy decisions.


The parties are expected to overcome their remaining differences and divide up cabinets posts this week.


But complaints within the CDU about policy compromises have grown louder in recent weeks as the SPD has demanded and won concessions from Merkel on a minimum wage and other measures conservatives fear could hurt the economy.


“The news from the coalition talks is setting off alarm bells in industry,” Kurt Lauck, president of a business lobby within the CDU, wrote to Merkel in a letter published in German newspapers at the weekend.


Meanwhile, SPD leader Sigmar Gabriel faces a major challenge in convincing the grassroots of his party to back a coalition deal that may not contain the big public spending boost they had called for in the German election campaign.


Der Spiegel magazine reported at the weekend that scepticism about entering what would be the second “grand coalition” with Merkel in less than a decade was high in local SPD chapters ahead of a high-stakes party referendum in early December, where 470,000 rank-and-file members will get to vote on the coalition.


Were they to veto the deal, which still seems unlikely, Germany could face many more months of political uncertainty, and possibly even new elections.


“We really need to pull together to bring the party along. This is not a done deal by any means,” said Martin Schulz, the president of the European Parliament and a top negotiator for the SPD in the talks.


Some of the critical rhetoric from both camps is posturing. By taking a sceptical line, both the SPD and CDU are sending the message to each other that they can live without a deal.


They may be hoping this will help them wring last-minute concessions from the other side in a final round of negotiations that is scheduled for Tuesday and likely to spill into the early morning hours of Wednesday.


But the mood is clearly different than it was in 2005, when Merkel won a narrow victory over the SPD, and was forced to form the first right-left coalition of Germany’s big “Volksparteien”, or people’s parties, since the 1960s.


Back then, the CDU was happy to be returning to government after seven years in opposition, and the SPD was glad to have thwarted Merkel’s goal of a center-right government.


This time around, there is a much deeper sense of ambivalence in both camps, like an estranged couple that has agreed to live under one roof for the good of the children — or in this case the country.


EUROPE


Berlin’s European partners also have reason to be disappointed. Some had hoped the center-left SPD would push Merkel towards a more growth-friendly vision for Europe.


Instead, the future of the crisis-plagued single currency bloc has played only a minor role in the talks, and a deal on the most pressing European issue — the creation of a new body to wind down stricken banks — has proved elusive.


Anti-euro voices within the Bavarian Christian Social Union (CSU), sister party to Merkel’s CDU, also appear to be growing louder.


Over the weekend, the CSU’s most prominent eurosceptic Peter Gauweiler was elected to the post of deputy party leader. And Alexander Dobrindt, a CSU politician who repeatedly called for Greece to leave the euro at the height of the crisis, is expected to win a top position in Merkel’s new cabinet.


“The talks have been very disappointing for those who had hoped the SPD would push hard on the European themes it stressed during the campaign,” said Ulrike Guerot of the Open Society Initiative.


On the domestic policy front, Merkel’s CDU appears to have quashed the SPD’s demand for tax hikes on the rich in order to fund a boost in public spending on infrastructure, education and research. But it is unclear where the money for such investments, which all the parties support, will now come from.


The SPD looks to have got its way on the introduction of a nationwide minimum wage of 8.50 euros an hour and the loosening of a ban on dual citizenship for the children of immigrants born in Germany.


But grassroots members are complaining that Gabriel has failed to secure victories on big-money issues. They are also angry that the Bavarian CSU may succeed in its push for a motorway toll targeting foreigners that Merkel herself had ruled out during the campaign.


Cabinets posts are expected to be divided up in talks this week. Wolfgang Schaeuble is expected to remain finance minister, with Frank-Walter Steinmeier of the SPD returning as foreign minister, a post he held in the first “grand coalition” from 2005-2009.


Whether Gabriel joins the cabinet, perhaps as head of a trumped up economy and energy ministry, or takes Steinmeier’s post as parliamentary leader of the SPD is unclear.


Regardless, prominent German commentators are already denouncing the deal, even before it has been unveiled, as an ugly mix of lowest-common-denominator policies that fail to address the country’s most pressing challenges — from an ageing population to a costly shift out of nuclear power.


Polls show that many Germans agree. Last week a poll for public broadcaster ARD showed that 55 percent of respondents still favour a “grand coalition”, but that was down from 66 percent only one month before.


A minority of 43 percent see new elections as a viable option. In October, it was only 31 percent.


(Additional reporting by Michelle Martin; editing by Anna Willard)





Reuters: Top News



German parties edge warily towards "grand coalition" deal

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Merkel and SPD coalition talks enter final make-or-break phase

Merkel and SPD coalition talks enter final make-or-break phase
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/c0fcd__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif




Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:57am EST



* Merkel ready to cede on wages, SPD drops tax demands


* Industry worried about economy, SPD voters sceptical


By Stephen Brown


BERLIN, Nov 17 (Reuters) – Angela Merkel’s conservatives and Germany’s Social Democrats have forged a political marriage before and know each other’s ways, but as a new “big day” approaches, they are having to work hard to convince sceptical party members and the business world that they should give it another go.


Merkel’s Christian Democrats (CDU) and Bavarian allies were the clear winners in September’s election, taking 41.5 percent of the vote, but their former liberal partners in government lost all their seats, so the centre-right still needs to form a coalition with the humiliated centre-left.


After three weeks of negotiations on policy details, coalition talks enter the “hot phase” this week, and the knottiest problems must be resolved in a final session on Nov. 26 for the chancellor to have a new government by Christmas.


Both sides are making big concessions, but the conservatives want their landslide election victory reflected in the deal and the subsequent division of cabinet posts. Two conservatives spoke this weekend of “not letting the tail wag the dog”.


The SPD had its second-worst result of the post-war era, appealing to just 25.7 percent of voters, but doesn’t want to look like Merkel’s doormat.


“Forty percent of voters chose the conservatives’ platform. Support for the SPD’s ideas was much lower. This simple fact has to be reflected in the ‘grand coalition’ programme,” Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble told Bild newspaper in a preview of Monday’s edition.


From the sidelines, the industrial sector frets about the coalition undermining Europe’s biggest economy.


Four big car manufacturers – Volkswagen, BMW , Daimler and GM’s Opel – wheeled out their bosses for a joint newspaper interview on Sunday to warn, in the words of Daimler’s Dieter Zetsche, that “if conditions in Germany deteriorate, we’ll have to think about moving production elsewhere”.


That will worry Merkel, known as the “auto chancellor” for her links to the sector, and SPD Chairman Sigmar Gabriel, whose party is close to the trade unions. Neither wants to put at risk the high employment rate and solid economic recovery.


After Gabriel told a party congress in Leipzig he wanted to “strengthen the economic competence” of the SPD, CDU Secretary General Hermann Groehe said this should mean “the coalition parties can work together to avoid putting German jobs at risk”.


TIME TO DELIVER


If the devil is in the detail, he will make himself at home in a draft coalition document up to 160 pages long, the product of 12 working groups. SPD delegates in Leipzig will be ploughing through it before deciding how to vote in a ballot of 470,000 party members due by early December.


In theory, a “no” from SPD members could hijack the whole process, which would likely result in a new election.


But the leadership of both camps, while talking tough, signalled that a deal would be reached by Nov. 26.


“If everything is in the coalition treaty, then, damn it, we should be in no doubt about the SPD signing it and enabling a majority,” said Gabriel on Saturday. “Now you have to deliver, dear conservatives.”


The SPD have dropped one of their main election positions – higher taxes on the rich – but dug in their heels for a blanket minimum legal wage of 8.50 euros an hour. Merkel – and most business leaders – would rather have wage floors established sector by sector, by employers and workers rather than Berlin.


But she signalled at a rally on Friday that she was ready to cede on wages and also meet the SPD halfway on its demand to grant dual citizenship for non-European Union residents, a big issue for Germany’s large Turkish community.


“If you put down red lines on every single point, you can’t carry out coalition talks,” said the pragmatic Merkel, who has moved her party further left in eight years in power, dropping conservative credos like nuclear power and military service.


Political scientist Everhard Holtmann sees a “window of opportunity for the grand coalition since the chancellor made it clear the conservatives are ready to make concessions on issues like the minimum wage and possibly also dual citizenship”.


The final 10 days of talks are still expected to be tense; conservative parliamentary leader Volker Kauder predicted “the major points of conflict will be decided in the last two days”.


He portrayed the negotiations so far as a victory for the Merkel camp, telling a Sunday paper that campaign commitments to block tax hikes, new debts or crisis tools making Germany liable for other euro zone states’ finances had prevailed.


Gabriel’s talk of opening up to future alliances with the hardline Left Party, which has been ostracised for decades, was described as unhelpful by conservatives, but Holtmann saw it as a sop to SPD left-wingers opposed to another grand coalition.


With major differences between the SPD and Left on foreign policy especially – the Left opposes NATO membership, overseas military operations and weapons exports – he said the alternative of the SPD, Left and Greens using their slim numerical majority in the Bundestag to get rid of Merkel remained “totally unrealistic”.






Reuters: Bonds News




Read more about Merkel and SPD coalition talks enter final make-or-break phase and other interesting subjects concerning Bonds at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Islamist coalition calls for dialogue to ease Egypt"s crisis




CAIRO Sat Nov 16, 2013 1:15pm EST



A poster of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi is pictured on barbed wires during a protest by his supporters at El-Thadiya presidential palace in Cairo November 15, 2013. REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh

A poster of ousted Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi is pictured on barbed wires during a protest by his supporters at El-Thadiya presidential palace in Cairo November 15, 2013.


Credit: Reuters/Amr Abdallah Dalsh




CAIRO (Reuters) – A coalition of Islamists said on Saturday it was ready to seek dialogue to end Egypt’s bloody political crisis, on condition that the army-backed government halt a security crackdown.


The public offer was the first of its kind by the group since the violent dispersal of pro-Islamist sit-ins this summer, and it notably did not call for the reinstatement of ousted president Mohamed Mursi of the Muslim Brotherhood.


The most populous Arab state was thrown into turmoil after the army overthrew Mursi on July 3.


It was not immediately clear if the move would be backed by top leaders of the Brotherhood, which is part of the alliance, the National Coalition to Support Legitimacy, or how the military-backed government would respond.


Since hundreds were killed by security forces in the break-up of Islamist protest vigils in August, there has been no sign that either side is willing to open a dialogue to ease the turmoil, which has ravaged investment and tourism.


Saturday’s initiative could signal a willingness by the Brotherhood to pull their supporters off the streets, limiting the chance for confrontation, ahead of another round of mass protests called for this week.


The Coalition said at a press conference that dialogue could occur only if detainees were released and Islamist protesters were allowed to demonstrate peacefully.


It also made the dialogue conditional on an end to “hate campaigns” by the media. It said that satellite channels that broadcast Islamist views must be allowed back on air.


State and private media have been in lockstep with the military-backed authorities since Mursi’s overthrow, helping to whip up a public frenzy against the Brotherhood and its supporters.


TWO-WEEK WINDOW


Mohamed Ali Bishr, a Brotherhood leader who represented the group in meetings with Western diplomats as they attempted to negotiate an end to the sit-ins before they were broken up, said the dialogue offer was “limited to two weeks”.


Bishr, one of the few Brotherhood leaders not in jail, is seen as someone who could possibly negotiate with the military-backed authorities.


The government has unleashed a fierce crackdown against the Brotherhood since Mursi’s overthrow, arresting thousands of its members, including Mursi and most of its top leaders.


It has accused the Brotherhood of carrying out terrorist acts and said it would only be welcome in politics again if it renounced violence.


The group has been banned, and a panel of judges on Saturday recommended that its political wing, the Freedom and Justice Party, be dissolved.


The Brotherhood, for decades a non-violent underground movement, denies espousing the use of force and says the army staged a coup and undermined democratic gains made since a popular uprising toppled autocrat Hosni Mubarak in 2011.


It remains to be seen whether either the government or the top Brotherhood leaders, who have rejected dialogue outright and insist that Mursi remains the legitimate president, might be ready to compromise.


“It could be a turning point in the crisis if it was taken seriously by the government,” said Khail al-Anani, senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington.


“This is the first time for the coalition to implicitly remove the requirement of reinstating Mursi,” he said. “It can give a small window for negotiation.”


If the initiative gains traction, it might result in the Brotherhood suspending street protests and limiting the scope for confrontation. A state of emergency and nightly curfew, declared after Mursi’s overthrow, were ended on Thursday.


Western allies want the government to create an inclusive political process to bring stability to Egypt, which has a peace treaty with Israel and controls the strategic Suez Canal.


(Writing by Maggie Fick; Editing by Michael Georgy and Kevin Liffey)





Reuters: Top News



Islamist coalition calls for dialogue to ease Egypt"s crisis

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Coalition parties give up will cash










The Tories and Lib Dems are to give a £520,000 bequest to the Treasury, after claims it was to be left to the nation, not to the coalition parties.


Nurse Joan Edwards left the money to “whichever government is in office… to use as they may think fit.”


It was divided up as a party donation between the coalition with the Lib Dems getting £99,423 and Tories £420,576.


But after calls from Labour and some Tory MPs for a rethink, both parties announced they would give up the cash.




Powered By WizardRSS.com &
Hand Chain Saw – a must have Survival tool, with many uses.

BBC News – Home

Coalition parties give up will cash

Saturday, July 13, 2013

Coalition of Confusion... (RT)



Nearly one week after spearheading a military intervention in another Arab country. The US, UK, and France are coming under increasing pressure to explain th…
Video Rating: 0 / 5



Coalition of Confusion... (RT)

Friday, June 21, 2013

Greek party quits coalition over state TV debacle

ATHENS (Reuters) – The smallest party in Greece’s ruling coalition pulled out of the government on Friday after a row over the abrupt closure of the state broadcaster, leaving Prime Minister Antonis Samaras with a tiny majority in parliament.



Reuters: Top News



Greek party quits coalition over state TV debacle

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Dumb and Dumber Tax Hikes in Italy; Grand Coalition Splintering; Another Italy Convulsion Coming Up

One of the dumbest things a country can do in a recession is raise taxes. Yet, after pronouncing the end of austerity, Italy’s “grand coalition” government, led by Enrico Letta, is going to hike the VAT.


Why? It seems they need to hike the VAT to pay for a decrease in property taxes.


Recall that Silvio Berlusconi was only willing to take part in Letta’s grand coalition on condition property tax hikes were rolled back. Letta agreed to do that, but now Letta says Italy needs revenue hikes to make up for it.


Grand Coalition Splintering


Curiously, the International Business Times reports Enrico Letta’s Grand Coalition Could End Italy’s ‘Lingering Civil War’ .


What nonsense. Letta’s “grand coalition” is burnt toast already.


Eurointelligence gets it right.

Il Corriere della Sera and other Italian papers are leading with the news that finance minister Fabrizio Saccomanni and another cabinet ministers said yesterday that Italy cannot simultaneously afford to cut the IMU housing tax and not implement an envisaged rise in VAT, and would thus opt to raise VAT.

In its coverage, La Repubblica writes that Saccomanni is now becoming a controversial within the coalition, as Silvio Berlusconi appears to appear chosen him as a target for his verbal attacks. The VAT increase is threatening to drive a gulf between the two largest parties, the PD and Berlusconi’s PdL.


Another Italy Convulsion Coming Up


I agree with the following comments from Eurointelligence: “A rise in VAT is probably the worst thing that can happen right now … Italy will miss the 2.9% deficit target, since the economy is likely to go into another convulsion once VAT is raised.”


Beppe Grillo 5-Star Movement Implodes


As a side note the 5-Star movement of Beppe Grillo is imploding as well.

Two more MPs have left the Movimento 5 Stelle parliamentary group, the Huffington Post Italia reports, bring the total number to five. Lawmakers Alessandro Furnari and Giuliana Labriola have quit M5S after internal fights, accusing Grillo of being a dictator and the party for failing to make substantive proposals. In an interview, Furnari said the M5S was dying due the Grillo’ mix of inexperience, rawness and vulgar display of ideas without content.

Grillo, meanwhile, has gone again on a verbal rampage. As reported by Il Corriere della Sera, he called the current Italian Parliament an “empty can of tuna.” He said it was illegitimate because it was elected under an electoral law that he called is unconstitutional.


Support for Grillo is now down to 14% from over 25% in the election (See Youth Vote Propels Five Star Movement Into First Place as Largest Political Party in Italy).


Reader “AC”, from Italy, predicted the rise of Beppe Grillo well in advance of any mainstream media coverage, also told me “Grillo has peaked” shortly after the national election. She called that one correctly as well.


Infighting is everywhere in Italy now.


Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis



Dumb and Dumber Tax Hikes in Italy; Grand Coalition Splintering; Another Italy Convulsion Coming Up

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Merkel coalition partner warns against higher state spending



BERLIN (Reuters) – The leader of Chancellor Angela Merkel‘s junior coalition partner chided her over spending promises made ahead of September’s federal election and said now was not the time to abandon “economic sense”.


Merkel, whose center-right Christian Democrats (CDU) are well ahead in opinion polls, has signaled that more funds will be made available for families and for infrastructure projects if she wins a third term in office.


“I urgently advise staying in the realm of economic sense. Social policy promises like those now being proposed by the CDU have to be financially feasible,” Philipp Roesler of the liberal Free Democrats (FDP) told the Welt am Sonntag newspaper.


Germany must not abandon its aim of achieving a balanced budget, said Roesler, whose pro-business party is a staunch advocate of fiscal discipline.


The top-selling Bild daily on Saturday put a price tag of 28 billion euros on Merkel’s spending promises and said it showed Germany’s election campaign had finally begun.


“The euro and financial market crises are already yesterday. Four months before the federal election the parties criss-cross the country promising citizens what they supposedly want to hear,” said Bild in a commentary in Sunday’s edition.


Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble, a close Merkel ally, denied in a statement to Reuters any weakening of government resolve to cut public debt, though he said he saw scope for some modest additional spending in priority areas.


In Sunday’s interview, Roesler criticized the European Commission’s decision to grant France and Spain more time to reduce their budget deficits, saying it sent a “wrong signal” that could harm confidence in Europe’s readiness to reform.


Strong economic growth, buoyant tax revenues and lower unemployment have helped Germany, Europe’s biggest economy, to reduce its borrowing costs despite the ongoing euro crisis. German public debt nevertheless remains well above the EU’s 60 percent ceiling at over 80 percent of gross domestic product.


In some good news for Roesler, an opinion poll conducted by the Emnid pollster for the Bild am Sonntag newspaper showed support for his FDP at 5 percent, just enough to win seats in the Bundestag lower house in September’s election.


The FDP has sometimes dipped below the 5 percent threshold in opinion polls, raising doubts over whether Merkel will be able to renew the current center-right coalition.


The most likely outcome if the FDP fails to get back into parliament would be a ‘grand coalition’ between Merkel’s conservatives and the main opposition Social Democrats (SPD) like the one she led from 2005 to 2009.


In Sunday’s survey, Merkel’s Christian Democrats and their Bavarian allies the Christian Social Union (CSU) remained steady at 40 percent, the SPD was on 26 percent, its Green allies on 14 percent and the former communist Left on 7 percent.


(Reporting by Gareth Jones; Editing by Robin Pomeroy)




Economy News Headlines – Yahoo! News



Merkel coalition partner warns against higher state spending

Thursday, March 21, 2013

Why Washington won"t break up the banks — yet

From left, Elizabeth Warren, Barack Obama, Jack Lew, Sherrod Brown and David Vitter are shown. | AP Photos

A strange bedfellows, left-right coalition is now pressing for more dramatic action. | AP Photos

NEW YORK – The angry pitchfork brigade bent on breaking up the nation’s largest banks now includes unlikely members George Will and Peggy Noonan. Republicans at times outflank liberals in their zeal to downsize financial giants. And CPAC hosted a session at its convention on the threat posed by mega-banks.

But turn down the bipartisan Beltway static, and the true signal is clear: There is virtually no chance any significant piece of legislation will pass Congress that would meaningfully reduce the size of the nation’s biggest banks or restrict their activities.

It’s true the recent rise in break-up-the-banks fever could embolden regulators to get a little tougher in final Dodd-Frank rules, expected later this year. And a strange bedfellows, left-right coalition is now pressing for more dramatic action.

(Also on POLITICO: Too big to fail, too hard to change)

Still, there’s nothing on the horizon likely to satisfy those who say the biggest banks — led by JPMorganChase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Bank of America — continue to pose a systemic threat to the U.S. economy.

Here’s why: The White House has no desire to reopen any part of Dodd-Frank and believes too-big-to-fail will soon be a closed chapter. To admit otherwise would be a huge political walk-back. Some Republicans have warmed to the idea of bank breakups, but they’re nowhere close to agreement on how to do them. And the Democrats most associated with the idea, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), remain highly polarizing figures not likely to create a broad legislative coalition.

(Also on POLITICO: JPMorgan is taken to the woodshed)

“It’s a populist cause at the moment coming from the further reaches of each party,” said Tony Fratto, a former George W. Bush White House and Treasury official.

Even some of the biggest proponents of breaking up the banks acknowledge that while public support for their efforts is growing, the political dynamics still don’t favor them. At least not yet.

“I don’t think it’s inevitable that we break up the banks, but I do still think it’s likely,” said Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), who plans to introduce legislation later this year with Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) to limit bank size. “It may not happen in six months. It may not even happen in a year.”

Brown said the contents of his bill remain “very much in flux” but are likely to include higher capital requirements than even those contemplated by international regulators in Switzerland and a higher fee on “systemically important” institutions. Brown said he could get upwards of forty votes for the bill.

But financial industry lobbyists and senior officials on both sides of Capitol Hill and in both parties believe the number will be significantly lower.

They also say any other legislative efforts to cut down on bank size or repeal and replace parts of Dodd-Frank — such as toughening the section that purports to end the prospect of bailouts — have very little chance of success. “Cooler heads will prevail,” one senior Hill Republican said.


POLITICO – TOP Stories


Why Washington won"t break up the banks — yet

Saturday, March 16, 2013

VIDEO: United States News - North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Barack Obama, House of Representatives, Chuck Hagel

Afghanistan Helicopter Crash: U.S. Aircraft Down In Daman, Coalition Member Dead, NATO Says. Obama says US must shift cars, trucks off oil. Bipartisan immigration reform bill takes shape in House. U.S. has answer for North Korea

Thanks for checking us out. Please take a look at the rest of our videos and articles.

To stay in the loop, bookmark our homepage.


VIDEO: United States News - North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Barack Obama, House of Representatives, Chuck Hagel

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Italians Head to Voting Booths, Election Ends 9:00AM EST Monday; Surge for Grillo and "The Apathy Factor" Will Doom Bersani Coalition

Voting booths are open in Italy though 3:00PM Monday (9:00AM EST). Exit polls will trickle in soon after but early exit polls could be misleading. If the result is close will may not know for over a day.

The Wall Street Journal offers this Italian Election Guide.

Italian voters can cast ballots Sunday and until 0900 ET  Monday, after which exit polls will provide quick but approximate insight into the probable result of the election.

The center-left coalition led by Democratic Left leader Pier Luigi Bersani was five percentage points ahead of Silvio Berlusconi’s center-right coalition according to the average of polls before a blackout on such surveys kicked in two weeks ago, giving it clear front-runner status.

Exit polls in 2006 and 2008 underestimated votes cast for Mr. Berlusconi, but unless Italy’s 51 million eligible voters shifted dramatically in recent days, Mr. Bersani should  – even with fewer than a third of the ballots cast – win a plurality, meaning his coalition will be awarded a majority of seats in the 630-seat lower legislative chamber.

Shift Has Taken Place

The Journal says “unless Italy’s 51 million eligible voters shifted dramatically in recent days, Mr. Bersani should  win a plurality.“

I suggest such a shift has taken place. The open question regards turnout and apathy, not a shift, per se.

Loser’s Penalty

In the Chamber (the lower House of parliament) the party with the largest plurality in the national vote gets a majority (54%) of the seats. In the Senate (the upper chamber of parliament) each of 17 Italy’s regions operate independently and the winner of each region gets a majority (55%) of the region’s seats.

There are 315 seats in the Senate. Lombardy, Italy’s largest region gets 49 seats and the winner will take 27 seats (55%). The other parties will split the remaining 22. Second place may only get 10.

The Journal sums it up this way.

“If Mr. Bersani wins all 17 regions, his coalition will have 178 seats and a commanding upper-house majority. However, if he loses Lombardy, the most populuous region, he will have only 162 seats. If he wins Lombardy but loses Veneto – a near certainty given polling trends – and also loses Sicily – to Mr. Grillo rather than Mr. Berlusconi – the center-left will have 159 Senate seats, a razor-thin majority.“

Not So Fast

I am not convinced Bersani wins the Chamber, let alone the Senate. Some 22-25% of Italians were undecided in the election polls before blackout two weeks ago. Since then, I suggest (based on crowd turnout and social media comments) that there has been a surge for Beppe Grillio and Silvio Berlusconi.

The last election polls before the blackout look like this:

  • Bersani center-left 34.5%
  • Berlusconi center-right 29%
  • Beppe Grillo’s Five-Star Movement 19%
  • Monti Civic Choice 12%.

Given the number of undecided voters, Bersani can easily drop 3% or more (and I suspect more). If Berlusconi and/or Grillo gets a huge percent of the undecided votes, Bersani can easily drop  to second or even third place.

Senate Coalition Unlikely

Monti is a lost cause and I doubt he gets more than 10%, making a Senate coalition unlikely if not impossible.

I commented on the possibility of a win by Berlusconi or Grillo in Germany Warns Against “Silvio the Savior” (And That May Backfire); Fake Horse Race Odds Get Around Blackouts.

Reader “AC” who is from Italy but now lives in France writes …

Hi Mish

After a hung parliament, the next most likely outcome may very well be the Five Star Movement (M5S) getting an absolute majority. Rage against the political class is extremely high in Italy, everything that looks “new” is getting votes. Grillo was able to catch the sentiment shift with extremely populist proposals even though his economic program is quite incoherent if not blatantly preposterous.

Grillo support comes from the youngest part of the population.

Undecided voters may not vote at all (in Italy you do not have to register to have right to vote, you are registered by default) or they will probably shift massively to Grillo. The outcome will depend on whether the undecideds stay home.

How Grillo’s parliament members will react as newly elected officials is a real unknown. Grillo himself will not be in the Parliament, and his party will be quite young. None of them have much political experience, even not in smaller city councils.

What they will do? How they will react? Nobody knows. That’s the most “fascinating” thing of M5S, completely new people of a completely new party managed in a completely new way. Grillo and his candidates never did a single minute of TV interview during the whole campaign. They decided to ignore completely TV (but TV has not completely ignored them). This also is completely new, probably new in the modern world.

I do not think Berlusconi will be able to win this time. He has definitely lost a part of his voters, those that expected from him to keep his past promises.

The hung parliament is the most likely outcome, as I said months ago, and I do not even think that Bersani and Monti together will have majority.

Last but not least: Monti has declared yesterday that Merkel was not comfortable with Bersani as Prime Minister, but Merkel officially denied the minute after. Really a strange declaration from a man like Monti that made of international credibility its main “value proposition”.

Regards

AC

The Apathy Factor

I expect a surge of voter enthusiasm for Grillo that will take votes away from Bersani and Berlusconi. Somewhat paradoxically, I also expect a surge in apathy where voters stay home.

The apathy I refer to is not on the Grillo or Berlusconi side, but apathy for Bersani and Monti. Certainly the campaign by Monti is anemic. Thus, unless there is a late surge of energy for Bersani (and I highly doubt there is), Bersani is going to come up short.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com

Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis


Italians Head to Voting Booths, Election Ends 9:00AM EST Monday; Surge for Grillo and "The Apathy Factor" Will Doom Bersani Coalition