Showing posts with label Details. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Details. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

New Details From Benghazi Whistleblowers Could Be The End Of Obama and Clinton

At The Daily News Source, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by The Daily News Source and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, The Daily News Source makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


The Daily News Source does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on The Daily News Source.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to The Daily News Source and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on The Daily News Source send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


The Daily News Source has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. The Daily News Source"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



New Details From Benghazi Whistleblowers Could Be The End Of Obama and Clinton

Thursday, February 27, 2014

5 Juicy Details From The Brand New "Bridgegate" Documents That Just Came Out Today




chris christie budget

AP




On Thursday, the New Jersey Legislature released a new batch of documents subpoenaed as part of the ongoing investigation into whether the administration of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie played a role in lane closures on the George Washington Bridge last September. There are several new details that shed light on the scandal including Christie allies making politically incorrect jokes about causing “traffic problems” for a local rabbi and a mysterious figure in the Jersey State House called the “general.”


These documents are unredacted versions of records that were subpoenaed from close Christie ally David Wildstein by the Legislature’s Transportation Committee as part of its initial investigation into the closures, which caused days of gridlock in Fort Lee, N.J. Last month, the Legislature voted to establish a special committee solely dedicated to investigating the so-called “Bridgegate” scandal surrounding the closures. Some Democrats have alleged the lanes were shut to retaliate against Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich for not endorsing Christie’s re-election bid last year.


Wildstein, who grew up with Christie, was appointed by the governor to the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, which oversees the bridge. He resigned in December amid questions about the Fort Lee traffic jam. Christie has repeatedly said he had nothing to do with the closures. During a radio appearance Wednesday, Christie dismissed speculation about the scandal as “hysteria.” 


Here are the five juiciest details from the new document dump:


1) Traffic Problems In Tel Aviv


The new documents include a text message exchange from Aug. 19 in which Christie’s former Deputy Chief of Staff for Legislative and Intergovernmental Affairs, Bridget Anne Kelly, joked with Wildstein about causing “traffic problems” to take revenge against a rabbi who crossed him.


Wildstein kicked off the exchange by sending Kelly a photo of an unnamed man who he later identified as being “Jewish.” According to the local Bergen Record newspaper, that man is a rabbi named Mendy Carlebach. 


“He has officially pissed me off,” Wildstein wrote.


“We cannot cause traffic problems in front of his house, can we?” Kelly replied. 


“Flights to Tel Aviv all mysteriously delayed,” said Wildstein. 


An earlier round of subpoenaed communications infamously showed Kelly telling Wildstein it was, “time for some traffic problems in Fort Lee” in an email exchange on Aug. 13, 2013, a few weeks before the lanes were closed.


2) Christie Allies Scheduled Meetings To ‘Stave Off Reporters’ 


The new documents also include text messages between Wildstein and Bill Baroni, another top Christie Port Authority appointee who resigned in December. One of these conversations occurred last Sept. 17, days after a traffic columnist published an article in the Record describing the traffic jam that featured Sokolich speculating he was targeted by the closures. 


Baroni forwarded Wildstein messages he received from Sokolich asking whether the traffic was “punishment.” Wildstein responded that he had not yet “heard back” from Kelly.


“Fck (sic),” Baroni wrote. 


Wildstein then said Kelly told him she would be in touch shortly. Baroni suggested they make time to discuss a media strategy.


“We could sched (sic) a meeting to stave off reporters,” he said.


3) Who is the ‘General?’


So far, documents subpoenaed by the Legislature have shown several figures close to Christie were involved in discussions about the lane closures and subsequent fallout including; Baroni, Wildstein, Kelly, former Christie campaign manager Bill Stepien, and top administration spokesman Michael Drewniak. However, the new documents show other Christie aides discussed how to handle questions from the press and politicians about the closures. There was also an indication an unnamed figure Wildstein referred to as “general” was in on the conversation.


On Oct. 2, 2013, Baroni sent a text to Wildstein describing communication he had with Christie’s Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications, Maria Comella. 


“Comella didn’t think much of the story. Said Nobody paying attention,” Baroni wrote. 


“Bridget same,” replied Wildstein, in an apparent reference to Kelly. 


Wildstein followed up with a question.


“What did general want?” 


The remainder of this exchange was redacted. 


4) ‘O’Toole Statement Ready’


Other subpoenaed documents have already shown indications state Senator Kevin O’Toole, the lone Republican on the Legislature’s special committee investigating the closures, was possibly communicating with Baroni and Wildstein as they gave testimony during the initial transportation committee investigation in November. Because of this, some observers have suggested O’Toole should be taken off the committee. Democrats with knowledge of the investigation who have spoken with Business Insider have also raised questions about whether a statement O’Toole issued last Nov. 25, the day Baroni testified, indicated coordination since it contained many of the same figures Baroni cited in his testimony. In that statement, O’Toole blasted the Legislature’s investigation into the closures as “discriminatory.”


The newly unredacted documents include an exchange from Nov. 25 where Baroni asks Wildstein for feedback on the testimony. In what seems to be an indication they were indeed in the loop with O’Toole, Wildstein also updated Baroni on the status of O’Toole’s statement.


“O’Toole statement ready,” he wrote. 


5) Job Security 


On November 12 of last year, Baroni sent Wildstein a text that was perhaps indicative of the mounting pressure Christie’s allies faced amid growing questions about the closures. 


“Are we being fired?” he wrote.


Later portions of that conversation were redacted. 




Politics



5 Juicy Details From The Brand New "Bridgegate" Documents That Just Came Out Today

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Sandy Hook Shooting Investigation Report: Grim Details, No Motive

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Sandy Hook Shooting Investigation Report: Grim Details, No Motive

Friday, November 22, 2013

Fed"s Tarullo details plans to counter bank runs

Fed"s Tarullo details plans to counter bank runs
http://currenteconomictrendsandnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/09d69__p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif





WASHINGTON Fri Nov 22, 2013 1:47pm EST



WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Global regulators should have more policy tools to counter the risk of devastating bank runs and should have powers over a wide array of market participants, U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Dan Tarullo said on Friday.


“There is a need to supplement prudential bank regulation with a third set of policy options in the form of regulatory tools that can be applied on a market-wide basis,” Tarullo said at a conference on shadow banking.


Tarullo also detailed the Fed’s plans to make new rules that would make it less attractive for banks to raise cash in short-term wholesale funding markets, a key factor in the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008.


Banks that substantially rely on short-term funding in the interbank market should be required to hold more capital on top of what is already mandated by international rules under the so-called Basel III pact, Tarullo said.


Tarullo, who is the central bank’s main policymaker on financial regulation, announced the Fed was working on a short-term funding rule earlier this year.


He said that international regulators should also consider ramping up capital requirements for matched books of repurchasing – or repo – agreements, which are a prominent part of the shadow banking system.


“Current versions of capital and liquidity standards do not deal with matched book issues,” he said.


Thirdly, regulators should address risk in such transactions regardless of whether they were executed by banks or by other market participants, such as hedge funds.


The Financial Stability Board, in which global regulators cooperate, was already working on plans to do so, Tarullo said, but he said he disagreed with some of the details, and presented some alternative ideas.


(Editing by Dan Grebler)






Reuters: Business News




Read more about Fed"s Tarullo details plans to counter bank runs and other interesting subjects concerning Business at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Obscuring the Details: A Panoramic Look at America’s Case Against Syria


US-Syria


The US federal government and the various agencies, media organizations, individuals, foreign governments, non-governmental organizations, lobbies, forces, and other entities that are tied to it have done everything in their power to obscure the details involving the chemical attacks that took place in Syria on August 21, 2013. The aim has been to justify the US-led foreign campaign that was launched against Syria in 2011 by making the Syrian government appear culpable of grievous crimes. The chemical attack on Ghouta has now come to represent the crux of the matter.


From the very start there was double-speaking coming from Washington and its cohorts about what happened in Ghouta. The Obama Administration and America’s allies deliberately ignored that chemical weapons were used in Syria prior to August 21, 2013. They have pretended that the United Nations investigation team that had arrived in Syria when chemical weapons were used in Ghouta had just stumbled there coincidentaly or with the purpose of «inspecting» the Syrian government’s chemical weapon depots.


Ignoring the Original Mandate of the UN Investigators 


In reality, the UN team that arrived in Syria in August was not a team of weapons inspectors. It was a team of «investigators.» Even more importantly, the Syrian government had invited the UN investigation team to Syria in March 2013. This was because the insurgents had launched chemical attacks on March 19, 2013. The US and its allies tried to blame Syria, but they were embarrassingly contradicted by Carla Del Ponte, one of the UN investigators responsible for Syria, that said all the evidence pointed to the insurgents and not the Syrian government. Although she backed her conclusion with facts, Del Ponte was dismissed by the US, and NATO even abnormally took the time to make a statement against here. Moreover, the insurgents were even caught trying to sneak sarin gas into Syria from Turkey by Turkish security forces in May 2013.


Because the insurgents were behind the chemical attacks in March 2013, Syria’s government originally wanted the UN investigators to have the authority and mandate to officially assign blame on which party used the chemical weapons. The US, however, put all types of obstacles in place to prevent the UN from issuing a report that the US-supported insurgents were using chemical weapons. It was the US, Britain, and France that prevented an UN investigation that could assign responsibility for any chemical weapon attacks from taking place. Instead they wanted a politicized inspection team that would try to demonize Syria and write reports against Damascus. This led to a deadlock in the United Nations over the type of team that the UN would send to work in Syria. A settlement was eventually reached. The US and its allies eventually reduced the mandate of the UN inspectors to one of only determining if chemical weapons were used.


The United Nation’s team even spells out the fact that they had originally entered Syria to investigate the March 2013 chemical attacks all in their September 2013 report’s Letter of Transmittal signed by Ake Sellstrom, the head of the UN mission, Scott Cairns, the head of the OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons) component of the UN mission, and Maurizio Barbeschi, the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) component of the UN mission. The UN team states the following on the report’s third page: «Having arrived in the Syrian Arab Republic on 18 August 2013, we were in Damascus on the 21 August preparing to conduct on-site inspections in connection with our investigation into the allegations concerning the use of chemical weapons in Khan al-Asal and in Sheik Maqsood and Saraqueb. Based on several reports of allegations on the use of chemical weapons in the Ghouta area of Damascus on 21 August 2013, you instructed us to focus our investigation efforts on the Ghouta allegations. We, therefore, proceeded to conduct on-site inspections in Moadamiyah in West Ghouta and Ein Tarma and Zamalka in East Ghouta».


Cooked US Intelligence and Implausible White House Stories


The narrative that the US government and its allies present about Ghouta is contradictory to logic and highly implausible. Added to the fact that the US has a track record of lying to create pretexts for aggression, Washington’s claims should be heavily scrutinized. So should the same group of non-governmental organizations that have consistently backed American wars and conjured instant reports to justify US foreign policy and war.


President Obama and John Kerry claimed that the Syrian military used chemical weapons while it was advancing militarily in Ghouta. This is contrary to any procedure that would be followed by an organized military force. An advancing military would not gas an area when it was entering it with its forces. Obama and Kerry might as well have claimed that the Syrian military had decided to reduce the number of its own troops by killing them.


Furthermore, there was no tactical need to use chemical weapons in Ghouta whatsoever. Ghouta did not have a large amount of anti-government fighters. Nor was Ghouta under the full control of the insurgents. Despite being in worse situations, the Syrian military never bothered using chemical weapons earlier in the conflict when things were dire for the Syrian government.


On the contrary, using chemical weapons would be a self-defeating and suicidal move by the Syrian government. Why would the Syrian government use chemical weapons when the combined UN team of OPCW and WHO investigators arrived in Syria to investigate the use of chemical attacks? Moreover, why would the Syrian military decide to use chemical weapons unnecessarily?


No evidence has been provided that the Syrian government was responsible for the chemical attack on Ghouta. On the contrary the US has only made claims and a series of contradictory statements. Using cooked Israeli evidence, Washington has claimed that the orders to use chemical weapons were intercepted, but has failed to provide the transcripts or to give any names of Syrian officials. In its own intelligence report the US government has also said that it knew in advance that the chemical attacks were going to happen. If the US government is to be believed, this would mean that the Obama Administration did not mention it and did nothing to prevent the use of chemical weapons from happening.


It turns out that the US government was given some type of advanced warning by the Iranian government about a chemical attack in Syria. The warning, however, was that the insurgents planned on using chemical weapons. This has been matched by statements from insurgents themselves that Saudi Arabia had provided the chemical weapons to the insurgents. Russian officials have also assessed that the chemical attacks in Ghouta were part of an intelligence operation conducted by Saudi Arabia.


Chemical Weapon Hypocrisy


It is not true either that the Syrian government lied about not having chemical weapons. Even though it was widely known, Damascus never denied or acknowledged that it had chemical weapons. The Syrian government always strategically applied a policy of deliberate ambiguity that neither confirmed nor denied that Syria had chemical weapons in its military arsenal. Anyhow, there was acknowledgement from Syrian officials that Syria possessed chemical weapons when Syrian officials said that they were worried that the insurgents would try to get their hands on the chemical weapon stocks inside Syria or use chemical weapons to frame the government.


Aside from Prime Minister Ehud Olmert admitting that Israel has nuclear weapons in 2006, the deliberate ambiguity of Syria is the same policy that Israel has tried to apply in regards to its biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Despite the same policy being used by both Damascus and Tel Aviv, the US government and media apply double standards by falsely accusing Syria of lying about its possession of chemical weapons while they say nothing about Israel. Instead both the US government and media refuse to admit or recognize the fact that Syria was applying a policy of ambiguity.


President Obama even had the audacity to call the August 2013 use of chemical weapons in Syria the worst chemical weapon attack of the 21st Century. He ignored the use of chemical weapons against Iraqi combatants and civilians in Fallujah and Israeli chemical weapon attacks on Lebanon and Gaza. As heinous a crime as the chemical attacks on Ghouta were, more Iraqis were killed by the United States in its chemical attacks on Fallujah.


Even looking back at the last century, it was the United States and its British allies that armed Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons by knowingly providing him the materials and technology needed to gas both the Iraqi Kurds and Iran. Not once did the US condemn the use of chemical weapons by the Iraqi government in the 1980s while Baghdad was aligned with Washington. The British Defence Ministry was even directly helping Saddam Hussein’s government develop his chemical and biological weapons in Iraq while the Pentagon helped the Iraqis organize their attacks on Iran and sent US military officers to examine the success of Iraqi chemical warfare against the Iranians. Instead the US deliberately went out of its way to blame the Iranian victims of being responsible for the chemical weapon attacks.


Making Self-Serving Interpretations of the UN Report


It is clear from the radically different interpretations that the US and Russia have about the Final Communiqué of the Action Group for Syria that was made in Geneva on September 30, 2012 that Washington deliberately makes self-serving interpretations of anything from its agreements to international law and multilateral deals. While the consensus that was reached in the final communiqué at Geneva in 2012 called for a peaceful and democratic solution to the conflict in Syria, the US and its allies deliberately choose to pretend that their agenda was adopted by Russia, China, and the rest of the world. By this Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the league of foreign ministers supporting regime change in Damascus falsely claimed the Action Group for Syria called for a transitional government that would not include any role for President Bashar Al-Assad.


The case has been the same in regards to the UN team’s September 2013 report about the nature of the chemical weapon attacks in Ghouta. The initial UN report has been interpreted in self-serving ways by the US and its cohorts. The fact that an old Soviet-manufactured projectile was used on August 21 is being highlighted as an indicator of the Syrian government’s guilt, because the Syrian military uses Soviet-made and Russian-made weapons.


Just because a Soviet weapon was used does not mean that the Syrian military was behind the attack. Old Soviet weapons are in wide use, including by the insurgents in Syria. Even more importantly, the Soviet-made BM-14 series projectile is not in use in the Syrian military’s arsenal. Moreover, the Soviet Union never exported this model to Syria nor did Soviet officials ever supply any sarin gas warheads to any country. It has also been reported that the three Arab countries that receive this projectile were Egypt, South Yemen, and Libya.


Human Rights Watch (HRW), which has been actively lobbying for a war against Syria, has even produced a map to indict the Syrian government as being responsible for the attack. The map, which is featured in a report published by HRW in September 2013, points the finger at 104 Brigade of the Syrian Republic Guard for the chemical attacks. This has been refuted, because only special military units can use or launch chemical weapons in Syria and 104 Brigade is not one of them. Furthermore, there is chain of command that needs to be followed; chemical weapons can only be used with a high-level clearance and approval from Syria’s upper echelons.


The US government has fallaciously tried to equate the UN’s verification that sarin gas was used as some type of evidence that the Syrian government was responsible. While sarin samples have been verified by the United Nations, the authenticity of the evidence that has been provided by the US that the Syrian government is guilty needs to be examined. The US-supported insurgent’s videos that were appraised as real by US intelligence and presented to the world by the Obama Administration as evidence have not been verified. On the contrary, these videos have dubious scenes where the same bodies reappear in different locations.


From Strategic Deterrence to Liability


The Obama Administration has deliberately hidden behind the word «norm» and its plural («norms») as a means of trying to substitute it for an aura and façade of legality when it claims that Syria is in violation of international norms. Norms are expected patterns of behavior and not compulsory laws that must be enforced by the international community. Moreover, if the US wanted to follow international law it would obey what the Chemical Weapons Convention stipulates clearly, which says that when there is a violation all the signatories of the Chemical Weapons Convention must gather and then collectively decide what to do. There is no international law in place that allows the United States to unilaterally decide what to do or present itself as the enforcer of international agreements.


Syria was never in violation of international law through it position of chemical weapons either. This is because, like Egypt, Syria never signed the Chemical Weapons Convention. The reason behind this decision was that both the Egyptian and Syrian militaries decided to hold on to their chemical arms as strategic deterrents against Israel’s biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons of mass destruction. Although Israel became a signatory state to the Chemical Weapons Convention in 1993, just like Myanmar, the Israelis did not ratify the Chemical Weapons Convention. This is why Syria chose not to sign the Chemical Weapons Convention until after the chemical attack in Ghouta.


It became clear to the Syrian government in 2013 that the liability of Syria’s chemical weapons arsenal outweighed its use as a strategic deterrent. As a result of the Syrian conflict, Syria’s chemical weapons have become less likely to prevent a foreign attack or invasion of Syria. The liability has become too great and as a result the Syrian government decided to give them up. This has pleased both the US and Israel, because it has given them a strategic advantage over Syria and its regional allies.


Now that Damascus has joined the Chemical Weapons Convention it should be noted that the Syrian government is not responsible for destroying its chemical weapons stock either under the agreement it has with the OPCW. It is the OPCW and the United Nations that are the responsible parties. The responsibility of Syria is to identify and declare all of its chemical weapons stock and to provide the OPCW access to them for destruction. It is possibly that the US may also try to obscure these facts as well to manipulate the situation.


America’s Goal is to Crush the Syrian Nation in an Indirect War of Attrition


The US government does not care about making the world a safer place. Syria’s chemical weapons have been a smokescreen all along. Speaking to Perviy Kanal (Channel One/First Channel), Russia’s largest network, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov let it be publicly known that the US was threatening to end working with the OPCW and to sabotage the agreement to destroy Syria’s stockpile of chemical weapons if the Russians refused to give political compensations to the US. What Washington has wanted in return for an agreement to destroy Syria’s chemical weapons is that Russia and China allow a United Nations Security Council resolution that authorizes the use of force to be passed.


Before the chemical attacks on Ghouta, the anti-government forces in Syria were suffering one major defeat after another at the hands of the Syrian military. As the internal pressure against Syria began declining, the external pressure began increasing. The Israeli aerial assaults on Syria and the Turkish border incidents and threats were meant to bring the Syrian military’s winning momentum to an end. These Israeli and Turkish moves were meant to change the balance of power and direction of battle momentum in Syria. Their aim was to do this by psychologically disorienting and weakening the Syrian military and government with crippling doses of fear while motivating and encourage the anti-government militias to intensify their attacks.


The psychological attempts to bolster the anti-government militias against the Syrian military and its supporters failed. The Syrian military’s victories continued throughout 2013. The anti-government militia incursions into Latakia were blocked and their offensive surge from the Jordanian border was beaten by the Syrian military. Hezbollah also intervened to help purge the anti-government forces from the Lebanese-Syrian borders.


This has brought the US and its allies closer and closer into direct confrontation, in some form or other, instead of indirectly attacking Syria via their proxies. The US government, however, prefers to secure its objectives without using its own resources or exerting itself in any costly ventures. This is why Washington’s initial option has been to threaten and to give the perception of being ready to use military force before actually using military force.


The US strategy in Syria is that of an indirect war of attrition. America loses the conflict in Syria if either combating side in Syria wins. The US government and Israel want the fighting in Syria to continue as long as possible between all combating sides. Washington and Tel Aviv do not want to see anyone coming out totally victorious. This is even acknowledged by US analysts with high-level ties to the Pentagon and US government. This objective is candidly outlined in an article written on August 24, 2013 by Edward N. Luttwak, a military analyst and senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, in the New York Times.


The real target of the US-led campaign in Syria is the Syrian nation and not merely the government in Damascus. The government could matter less. The US and Israeli objectives in Syria are to crush Syria as a nation-state, even if their own insurgent allies or Syrian National Coalition clients win and form the government in Damascus.




Global Research



Obscuring the Details: A Panoramic Look at America’s Case Against Syria

Sunday, September 29, 2013

9 11 Conspiracy Solved Names, Connections, Details Exposed! YouTube

A featured video on 9/11 and the issues surrounding the event.



9 11 Conspiracy Solved Names, Connections, Details Exposed! YouTube

A MUST SEE ! THE MONEY TRAIL THAT DETAILS THE ROBBERY THAT 911 WAS THE PERFECT DISTRACTION FOR.



9 11 Conspiracy Solved Names, Connections, Details Exposed! YouTube

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

As Victims Of The Navy Yard Shootings Are Named, Details Emerge





One day after 12 people and an alleged gunman died at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C., details about their livse are beginning to emerge. Tuesday morning, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, far right, and others laid a wreath at the U.S. Navy Memorial in honor of the shooting victims.



Drew Angerer/Getty Images

One day after 12 people and an alleged gunman died at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C., details about their livse are beginning to emerge. Tuesday morning, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, far right, and others laid a wreath at the U.S. Navy Memorial in honor of the shooting victims.



One day after 12 people and an alleged gunman died at the Navy Yard in Washington, D.C., details about their livse are beginning to emerge. Tuesday morning, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel, far right, and others laid a wreath at the U.S. Navy Memorial in honor of the shooting victims.


Drew Angerer/Getty Images



The victims of the Navy Yard shootings that brought panic and tragedy to a corner of Washington, D.C., on Monday morning are in many people’s thoughts as their names and other information are released. We’ll collect what we know about the victims here.


The identities of the 13 people, including the gunman, who died and at least eight who were wounded are being released by officials as family members are informed of the victims’ status. So far, police have identified seven of the people who were slain, in addition to the alleged shooter, Aaron Alexis, 34.


Tuesday morning, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel and other officials held a wreath-laying ceremony at the U.S. Navy Memorial plaza to honor the victims of the attack, which occurred around 8:20 a.m. in Building 197 of the Navy Yard, a popular morning spot with a breakfast cafeteria.


Several of those who were hurt or killed Monday had worked at the Navy Yard for decades. These seven people have been identified as having died in the attack:


Michael Arnold, 59, of Lorton, Va., was a “wonderful person and a wonderful neighbor,” a neighbor told The Washington Post. She was on her way to visit Arnold’s wife, in an attempt to comfort her.


A retired Navy officer who was working as a consultant on ship design, Arnold was also a pilot who was building his own airplane, his uncle, Steve Hunter, told The Associated Press in an interview from Rochester, Mich., where Arnold grew up.


“Arnold and his wife, Jolanda, had been married for more than 30 years,” the AP reports, citing Hunter. “They had two grown sons, Eric and Christopher.”


Sylvia Frasier, 53, of Charles County, Md., worked in computer network security at the Naval Sea Systems Command. Word of her fate didn’t reach some family members until just before 10 p.m. last night, The Post says.


Frasier’s family, including her six siblings, tell the newspaper that they had been told earlier Monday that Sylvia had been hurt and was in the hospital. But they prepared themselves for the worst.





A family photo shows Kathy Gaarde, one of the people killed in Monday’s shootings at Washington’s Navy Yard. Her husband, Douglass, says the picture depicts Gaarde “with her 94-year-old mother who she cared for until she passed away last year.”



Douglass Gaarde


Kathy Gaarde, 62, of Woodbridge, Va., was a financial analyst who a neighbor says may have been close to retiring; her husband retired from the Navy last year, the AP reports.


“Today my life partner of 42 years (38 of them married) was taken from me, my grown son and daughter, and friends,” her husband, Douglass Gaarde, wrote in an email to the news agency. We were just starting to plan our retirement activities and now none of that matters. It hasn’t fully sunk in yet but I know I already dearly miss her.”


A neighbor, Patrick Bolton, tells The Post that Gaarde “was just the kindest lady in the world.” He added, “I’m not even exaggerating. I’ve never seen her do anything but nice things for people.”


John Roger Johnson, 73, was a longtime resident of Derwood, Md., a neighbor tells The Post, who loved kids.


A friend and former co-worker, William Venable, tells NPR’s Hansi Lo Wang that Johnson, or J.J., was his colleague in the IT department, doing things like distributing cellphones and wireless cards. The job could be tedious — but every day, Venable said, Johnson greeted him with the same enthusiasm.


“His greeting to me — every day, religiously — was, ‘How ya doin’ buddy?!’”


“I’m a 20-something year-old black man, and he’s a 70-plus-year-old white guy,” Venable says. “You know, we had zero in common. But we had great conversations, and he was a great spirit, it was a spirit that you could connect with. He was one of my best friends in that place.”


Frank Kohler, 50, of St. Mary’s Co., Md., also died in Monday’s attack.


“Kohler, 50, of Tall Timbers was reportedly married with two daughters,” reports The Baynet.com. “It is not known at this time what he was doing at the Navy Yard.”


Vishnu Pandit, 61, had lived in North Potomac, Md., for at least 20 years, The Post reports.


A neighbor tells the newspaper they saw many cars arrive at the Pandit family’s house late Monday. Another neighbor, Mike Honig, described Pandit as “a very nice man with an Irish setter,” The Post says.


Few other details have emerged about Pandit. His family has elected not to comment publicly at this point.


Kenneth Bernard Proctor, 46, Waldorf, Md., was a civilian utilities foreman who had worked for the government for 22 years, his ex-wife, Evelyn Proctor, tells the AP. He was, she says, “a very loving, caring, gentle person. His kids meant a lot to him.”


The couple have two teenage sons — one is 15; the other is in basic training after enlisting in the Army.


Evelyn Proctor says her ex-husband didn’t work in Building 197, but had gone there for his usual breakfast. And they had talked on the phone Monday morning. She learned of his death Monday evening.


“We were still very close. It wasn’t a bitter divorce,” she said. The pair had dated as far back as high school. “We still talked every day, and we lived 10 minutes away from each other.”


Several other people have been identified by The Post as victims who died — we’re awaiting official word before we publish their names.


Of at least eight people who were wounded Monday, three were shot and the rest reportedly suffered other injuries.


Police officer Scott Williams underwent surgery after suffering gunshot wounds to his legs. D.C. officials said he is recovering and talkative. At a news conference Monday night, Metropolitan Police Chief Cathy Lanier said she and Williams entered the police force around the same time and that he has “a stellar record.”


And it seems that Mr. Williams is also a man with priorities.


“The police officer when he came in … he was most concerned about being able to talk to his mother,” Dr. Janis Orlowski, chief medical officer at Washington Hospital Center, tells NPR member station WAMU. Williams “wanted to make sure that he was able to speak to her before he went into surgery. You know… you always have to take care of mom,” she said.


Williams and two civilians, both women, were all able to talk with medical and police staff and are expected to recover, Orlowski says. One of the women had surgery for a wound to her shoulder; the other did not need surgery, despite a wound to her head.


“She’s a very, very lucky young lady,” Orlowski says. “She had an injury to her hand and her head. But the bullet did not actually penetrate the skull. It did not penetrate the bone.”




News



As Victims Of The Navy Yard Shootings Are Named, Details Emerge

BEX ALERT - Forensic Details in U.N. Report Point to Assad’s Use of Gas


Jm Lopez/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images


Syrian volunteers on Sunday in the northern city of Aleppo put on gas masks in a class on how to respond to a chemical attack.




A United Nations report released on Monday confirmed that a deadly chemical arms attack caused a mass killing in Syria last month and for the first time provided extensive forensic details of the weapons used, which strongly implicated the Syrian government.




While the report’s authors did not assign blame for the attack on the outskirts of Damascus, the details it documented included the large size and particular shape of the munitions and the precise direction from which two of them had been fired. Taken together, that information appeared to undercut arguments by President Bashar al-Assad of Syria that rebel forces, who are not known to possess such weapons or the training or ability to use them, had been responsible.


The report, commissioned by Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, was the first independent on-the-ground scientific inquest into the attack, which left hundreds of civilians gassed to death, including children, early on Aug. 21.


The repercussions have elevated the 30-month-old Syrian conflict into a global political crisis that is testing the limits of impunity over the use of chemical weapons. It could also lead to the first concerted action on the war at the United Nations Security Council, which up to now has been paralyzed over Syria policy.


“The report makes for chilling reading,” Mr. Ban told a news conference after he briefed the Security Council. “The findings are beyond doubt and beyond the pale. This is a war crime.”


Mr. Ban declined to ascribe blame, saying that responsibility was up to others, but he expressed hope that the attack would become a catalyst for a new diplomatic determination at the United Nations to resolve the Syrian conflict, which has left more than 100,000 people dead and millions displaced.


There was no immediate reaction to the report from the Syrian government. But just two days before the report was released, Syria officially agreed to join the international convention on banning chemical weapons, and the United States and Russia, which have repeatedly clashed over Syria, agreed on a plan to identify and purge those weapons from the country by the middle of next year. Syria has said it would abide by that plan.


The main point of the report was to establish whether chemical weapons had been used in the Aug. 21 attack in the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, an area long infiltrated by rebels. The United Nations inspectors concluded that “chemical weapons have been used in the ongoing conflict between the parties in the Syrian Arab Republic, also against civilians, including children, on a relatively large scale.”


The weapons inspectors, who visited Ghouta and left the country with large amounts of evidence on Aug. 31, said, “In particular, the environmental, chemical and medical samples we have collected provide clear and convincing evidence that surface-to-surface rockets containing the nerve agent sarin were used.”


But the report’s annexes, detailing what the authors found, were what caught the attention of nonproliferation experts.


In two chilling pieces of information, the inspectors said that the remnants of a warhead they had found showed its capacity of sarin to be about 56 liters — far higher than initially thought. They also said that falling temperatures at the time of the attack ensured that the poison gas, heavier than air, would hug the ground, penetrating lower levels of buildings “where many people were seeking shelter.”


The investigators were unable to examine all of the munitions used, but they were able to find and measure several rockets or their components. Using standard field techniques for ordnance identification and crater analysis, they established that at least two types of rockets had been used, including an M14 artillery rocket bearing Cyrillic markings and a 330-millimeter rocket of unidentified provenance.


These findings, though not presented as evidence of responsibility, were likely to strengthen the argument of those who claim that the Syrian government bears the blame, because the weapons in question had not been previously documented or reported to be in possession of the insurgency.




Reporting was contributed by Michael R. Gordon from Paris, Nick Cumming-Bruce from Geneva, Anne Barnard from Beirut, Lebanon, and David E. Sanger from New York.





WHAT REALLY HAPPENED



BEX ALERT - Forensic Details in U.N. Report Point to Assad’s Use of Gas

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Details keep flowing after Zimmerman trial




  • Juror B37: Zimmerman “was justified in shooting Trayvon Martin”

  • Four other jurors say Juror B37′s opinions don’t reflect the entire jury

  • Tom Joyner offers Rachel Jeantel a full ride to college

  • Attorney General Eric Holder slams “stand your ground” laws



(CNN) — The George Zimmerman murder trial may be over, but details from the case continue to emerge at a dizzying pace.


Several jurors have spoken out after the verdict. The prosecution’s key witness has been offered a full ride to college. And Attorney General Eric Holder blasted “stand your ground” laws but gave no hint about whether Zimmerman will face civil rights charges.


Here’s the latest on the Zimmerman trial aftermath:


Juror B37


The woman known as Juror B37 said she believes Zimmerman didn’t do anything unlawful and was “justified” in shooting 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, the juror told CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360.”


Juror B37 said she wanted to find Zimmerman guilty of “not using his senses,” but “you can’t charge him with anything because he didn’t do anything unlawful.”


She said Zimmerman “started the ball rolling” and could have avoided the situation by staying in his car.


“But he wanted to do good. I think he had good in his heart, he just went overboard,” the juror said.


Asked whether she thought Zimmerman was within his rights, she was unequivocal: “He was justified in shooting Trayvon Martin.”


Nonetheless, Juror B37 said she cried before and after the verdict was read.


“I don’t want people to think that we didn’t think about this, and we didn’t care about Trayvon Martin, because we did. We’re very sad that it happened to him,” she said.


To Martin’s parents, the juror said she would tell them that she is terribly sorry for their loss.


“I feel bad that we can’t give them the verdict that they wanted, but legally, we could not do that.”


Other jurors speak up


Shortly after the woman’s interview aired, four other jurors released a statement saying the opinions of Juror B37 “were her own, and not in any way representative” of all the jurors.


Those four jurors — who identified themselves by their jury pool numbers — were part of a six-woman jury that found Zimmerman not guilty. Five of the jurors are white, and one is black/Hispanic.


None of the jurors have identified themselves publicly. At one point, a literary agent said Juror B37 was planning to write a book about the trial, but the juror later decided not to.


College tuition for Rachel Jeantel


Tom Joyner, host of the “Tom Joyner Morning Show,” has offered to pay the tuition for Martin’s friend Rachel Jeantel to attend a historically black college or university.


“Rachel, here’s my offer to you. If you want to graduate from high school and go to an HBCU, even if it’s not in Florida but especially Florida … If you want to do that, I want to help you do that,” Joyner said during his radio show Tuesday.


Jeantel, now 19, was on the phone with Martin moments before he was shot and was considered a key prosecution witness. But her two days of testimony was tense and combative at times, and at least one juror said she had difficulty understanding her.


“The reaction to her testimony was very troubling to me,” Joyner told CNN’s Piers Morgan. “People were criticizing her and her education and communication skills and the way the lawyer was just beating her up on the stand, just really moved me.”


Jeantel, who said she might want to go into law enforcement, thanked Joyner.


Holder mum on possible federal charges


More than 1 million people have signed an NAACP petition demanding federal charges against Zimmerman, but Attorney General Eric Holder hasn’t said whether he will seek such charges.


Instead, Holder took aim at “stand your ground” laws like the one in Florida that have expanded the right to respond with deadly force if attacked outside the home.


Those laws “try to fix something that was never broken” and “senselessly expand the concept of self-defense and sow dangerous conflict in our neighborhoods,” he said in speech to the NAACP Tuesday.


He repeated his pledge for a full investigation of Martin’s death in the aftermath of Zimmerman’s acquittal on murder and manslaughter charges by a Florida court, saying the Justice Department “will continue to act in a manner that is consistent with the facts and the law. We will not be afraid.”


CNN’s Tom Cohen and Kellie Keesee contributed to this report.




CNN.com Recently Published/Updated



Details keep flowing after Zimmerman trial

Details keep flowing after Zimmerman trial




  • Juror B37: Zimmerman “was justified in shooting Trayvon Martin”

  • Four other jurors say Juror B37′s opinions don’t reflect the entire jury

  • Tom Joyner offers Rachel Jeantel a full ride to college

  • Attorney General Eric Holder slams “stand your ground” laws



(CNN) — The George Zimmerman murder trial may be over, but details from the case continue to emerge at a dizzying pace.


Several jurors have spoken out after the verdict. The prosecution’s key witness has been offered a full ride to college. And Attorney General Eric Holder blasted “stand your ground” laws but gave no hint about whether Zimmerman will face civil rights charges.


Here’s the latest on the Zimmerman trial aftermath:


Juror B37


The woman known as Juror B37 said she believes Zimmerman didn’t do anything unlawful and was “justified” in shooting 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, the juror told CNN’s “Anderson Cooper 360.”


Juror B37 said she wanted to find Zimmerman guilty of “not using his senses,” but “you can’t charge him with anything because he didn’t do anything unlawful.”


She said Zimmerman “started the ball rolling” and could have avoided the situation by staying in his car.


“But he wanted to do good. I think he had good in his heart, he just went overboard,” the juror said.


Asked whether she thought Zimmerman was within his rights, she was unequivocal: “He was justified in shooting Trayvon Martin.”


Nonetheless, Juror B37 said she cried before and after the verdict was read.


“I don’t want people to think that we didn’t think about this, and we didn’t care about Trayvon Martin, because we did. We’re very sad that it happened to him,” she said.


To Martin’s parents, the juror said she would tell them that she is terribly sorry for their loss.


“I feel bad that we can’t give them the verdict that they wanted, but legally, we could not do that.”


Other jurors speak up


Shortly after the woman’s interview aired, four other jurors released a statement saying the opinions of Juror B37 “were her own, and not in any way representative” of all the jurors.


Those four jurors — who identified themselves by their jury pool numbers — were part of a six-woman jury that found Zimmerman not guilty. Five of the jurors are white, and one is black/Hispanic.


None of the jurors have identified themselves publicly. At one point, a literary agent said Juror B37 was planning to write a book about the trial, but the juror later decided not to.


College tuition for Rachel Jeantel


Tom Joyner, host of the “Tom Joyner Morning Show,” has offered to pay the tuition for Martin’s friend Rachel Jeantel to attend a historically black college or university.


“Rachel, here’s my offer to you. If you want to graduate from high school and go to an HBCU, even if it’s not in Florida but especially Florida … If you want to do that, I want to help you do that,” Joyner said during his radio show Tuesday.


Jeantel, now 19, was on the phone with Martin moments before he was shot and was considered a key prosecution witness. But her two days of testimony was tense and combative at times, and at least one juror said she had difficulty understanding her.


“The reaction to her testimony was very troubling to me,” Joyner told CNN’s Piers Morgan. “People were criticizing her and her education and communication skills and the way the lawyer was just beating her up on the stand, just really moved me.”


Jeantel, who said she might want to go into law enforcement, thanked Joyner.


Holder mum on possible federal charges


More than 1 million people have signed an NAACP petition demanding federal charges against Zimmerman, but Attorney General Eric Holder hasn’t said whether he will seek such charges.


Instead, Holder took aim at “stand your ground” laws like the one in Florida that have expanded the right to respond with deadly force if attacked outside the home.


Those laws “try to fix something that was never broken” and “senselessly expand the concept of self-defense and sow dangerous conflict in our neighborhoods,” he said in speech to the NAACP Tuesday.


He repeated his pledge for a full investigation of Martin’s death in the aftermath of Zimmerman’s acquittal on murder and manslaughter charges by a Florida court, saying the Justice Department “will continue to act in a manner that is consistent with the facts and the law. We will not be afraid.”


CNN’s Tom Cohen and Kellie Keesee contributed to this report.




CNN.com Recently Published/Updated



Details keep flowing after Zimmerman trial

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Report Offers New Details On Death Of Man At Maryland Theater





FREDERICK, Md. — Police tried to forcibly remove a man with Down syndrome from a Maryland theater with tragic results, despite warnings from his caretaker that her client would “freak out” if they touched or spoke to him, according to her statement contained in an investigative file released Monday.


Robert Ethan Saylor, 26, died of asphyxia minutes later, after three Frederick County Sheriff’s deputies handcuffed the flailing, 294-pound man as he screamed, cursed and cried for his mother, witnesses say. Saylor’s offense, according to the file documents: He had not purchased a ticket for a repeat viewing of the movie “Zero Dark Thirty.”


The 98-page incident report and handwritten statements from 22 witnesses add new details to a case that remains in the spotlight six months after Saylor’s death on Jan. 12. Critics continue to call for an independent investigation of the deputies’ actions after a grand jury’s decision in March not to indict them for what the state medical examiner’s office has ruled a homicide.


The 18-year-old caretaker, whose name is redacted from the documents, wrote that she had been Saylor’s caretaker for three months before he died.


She said Saylor, known to his family as Ethan, had a history of angry outbursts, including one earlier that night. They had already seen the movie once and were outside the Frederick theater when she asked Saylor if he was ready to go home. Saylor began cursing and punched a storefront window, she told police.


Somewhat frightened, the caretaker called Saylor’s mother, Patti Saylor, of New Market.


“Patti told her to just wait him out and his attitude will change,” an investigator wrote in a follow-up interview report.


The caretaker then spoke by phone with another of Saylor’s caretakers. He advised her to leave Saylor in front of the theater while she got the car, giving him a few minutes alone to calm himself. But by the time she returned, Saylor had gone back into the theater and seated himself. As she walked in, a manager was telling Saylor he had to leave the auditorium.


“I explained, `Yes, we are having a little issue, I’ll handle it. We just have to be patient,” the caretaker wrote.


The manager then summoned one of the three deputies, Sgt. Rich Rochford. All of the deputies were moonlighting as mall security officers.


“Then a sheriff came and said, `Another show is starting. I have to go get him out,’” the caretaker wrote. “I explained Ethan is Down syndrome.”


She said she told the officer that if he spoke to Saylor, “he will curse.” She advised him to “wait it out.”


“Then the sheriff went in and started talking to Ethan and Ethan was cursing at him,” the woman wrote.


She said the officer threatened to arrest Saylor, a statement corroborated by other witnesses.


“I then said, `Please don’t touch him, he will freak out,’” the caretaker wrote. “Next thing I know, there are I think three or four cops holding Ethan, trying to put him in handcuffs.”


As the officers pulled the struggling Saylor from his seat and down an exit ramp, they went down out of view of most witnesses. One customer told police an officer had his knee on Saylor’s lower back while the other deputies held Saylor’s shoulders. At least two witnesses said the kneeling officer’s knee was on the floor. Nobody reported seeing the officers touch Saylor’s neck.


Saylor became unconscious, so the deputies rolled him over, by all accounts. The deputies couldn’t find a pulse, so they removed the handcuffs and started chest compressions until he started breathing again, snoring but unconscious, according to all accounts. They asked the caretaker if she could wake him.


“I tapped him and said, `Wake up, Ethan,’” she wrote.


Saylor never regained consciousness, despite the efforts of ambulance workers who arrived soon afterward.


The state medical examiner’s office found signs of “positional” asphyxia, or having been in a position in which he couldn’t breathe. There was also unexplained damage to Saylor’s larynx. The autopsy concluded Saylor would not have died had the officers not intervened. The autopsy also found that Saylor’s developmental disability, obesity, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a heart abnormality contributed to the death.


A family lawyer, Joseph Espo, said had not yet read the report and could not comment.


Attorneys for the deputies and the sheriff’s office didn’t immediately return calls from The Associated Press.


Earlier on HuffPost:



“; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’}); });



Crime on HuffingtonPost.com



Report Offers New Details On Death Of Man At Maryland Theater

Report Offers New Details On Death Of Man At Maryland Theater





FREDERICK, Md. — Police tried to forcibly remove a man with Down syndrome from a Maryland theater with tragic results, despite warnings from his caretaker that her client would “freak out” if they touched or spoke to him, according to her statement contained in an investigative file released Monday.


Robert Ethan Saylor, 26, died of asphyxia minutes later, after three Frederick County Sheriff’s deputies handcuffed the flailing, 294-pound man as he screamed, cursed and cried for his mother, witnesses say. Saylor’s offense, according to the file documents: He had not purchased a ticket for a repeat viewing of the movie “Zero Dark Thirty.”


The 98-page incident report and handwritten statements from 22 witnesses add new details to a case that remains in the spotlight six months after Saylor’s death on Jan. 12. Critics continue to call for an independent investigation of the deputies’ actions after a grand jury’s decision in March not to indict them for what the state medical examiner’s office has ruled a homicide.


The 18-year-old caretaker, whose name is redacted from the documents, wrote that she had been Saylor’s caretaker for three months before he died.


She said Saylor, known to his family as Ethan, had a history of angry outbursts, including one earlier that night. They had already seen the movie once and were outside the Frederick theater when she asked Saylor if he was ready to go home. Saylor began cursing and punched a storefront window, she told police.


Somewhat frightened, the caretaker called Saylor’s mother, Patti Saylor, of New Market.


“Patti told her to just wait him out and his attitude will change,” an investigator wrote in a follow-up interview report.


The caretaker then spoke by phone with another of Saylor’s caretakers. He advised her to leave Saylor in front of the theater while she got the car, giving him a few minutes alone to calm himself. But by the time she returned, Saylor had gone back into the theater and seated himself. As she walked in, a manager was telling Saylor he had to leave the auditorium.


“I explained, `Yes, we are having a little issue, I’ll handle it. We just have to be patient,” the caretaker wrote.


The manager then summoned one of the three deputies, Sgt. Rich Rochford. All of the deputies were moonlighting as mall security officers.


“Then a sheriff came and said, `Another show is starting. I have to go get him out,’” the caretaker wrote. “I explained Ethan is Down syndrome.”


She said she told the officer that if he spoke to Saylor, “he will curse.” She advised him to “wait it out.”


“Then the sheriff went in and started talking to Ethan and Ethan was cursing at him,” the woman wrote.


She said the officer threatened to arrest Saylor, a statement corroborated by other witnesses.


“I then said, `Please don’t touch him, he will freak out,’” the caretaker wrote. “Next thing I know, there are I think three or four cops holding Ethan, trying to put him in handcuffs.”


As the officers pulled the struggling Saylor from his seat and down an exit ramp, they went down out of view of most witnesses. One customer told police an officer had his knee on Saylor’s lower back while the other deputies held Saylor’s shoulders. At least two witnesses said the kneeling officer’s knee was on the floor. Nobody reported seeing the officers touch Saylor’s neck.


Saylor became unconscious, so the deputies rolled him over, by all accounts. The deputies couldn’t find a pulse, so they removed the handcuffs and started chest compressions until he started breathing again, snoring but unconscious, according to all accounts. They asked the caretaker if she could wake him.


“I tapped him and said, `Wake up, Ethan,’” she wrote.


Saylor never regained consciousness, despite the efforts of ambulance workers who arrived soon afterward.


The state medical examiner’s office found signs of “positional” asphyxia, or having been in a position in which he couldn’t breathe. There was also unexplained damage to Saylor’s larynx. The autopsy concluded Saylor would not have died had the officers not intervened. The autopsy also found that Saylor’s developmental disability, obesity, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and a heart abnormality contributed to the death.


A family lawyer, Joseph Espo, said had not yet read the report and could not comment.


Attorneys for the deputies and the sheriff’s office didn’t immediately return calls from The Associated Press.


Earlier on HuffPost:



“; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, ‘top’, {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: ‘clear-overlay’}); });



Crime on HuffingtonPost.com



Report Offers New Details On Death Of Man At Maryland Theater

Monday, July 15, 2013

For Obama"s climate plan, devil is in the details







President Barack Obama wipes away sweat during a speech on climate change at Georgetown University on Tuesday, June 25, 2013, in Washington. Obama is proposing sweeping steps to limit heat-trapping pollution from coal-fired power plants and to boost renewable energy production on federal property. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)





President Barack Obama wipes away sweat during a speech on climate change at Georgetown University on Tuesday, June 25, 2013, in Washington. Obama is proposing sweeping steps to limit heat-trapping pollution from coal-fired power plants and to boost renewable energy production on federal property. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)





President Barack Obama wipes his face as he speaks about climate change, Tuesday, June 25, 2013, at Georgetown University in Washington. The president is proposing sweeping steps to limit heat-trapping pollution from coal-fired power plants and to boost renewable energy production on federal property, resorting to his executive powers to tackle climate change and sidestepping the partisan gridlock in Congress. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — Frustrated by a recalcitrant Congress, President Barack Obama has vowed to take climate change into his own hands. Now he has to deliver.


Three weeks after giving an ambitious speech to outline his proposal, the president begins the arduous task of executing it. Obama’s plan is a complicated mix of rule-making and federal permitting that’s tough to encapsulate in a neat sales pitch — and may be even tougher to put into action.


By pledging to use his authority under existing laws, Obama freed himself from the need to sell the plan to skeptical lawmakers whose support he would need if he had to push a major climate change bill through Congress. Even so, he still needs public support to help shield vulnerable Democrats already facing criticism over the plan; their fate in the 2014 elections will determine whether Obama can accomplish much of anything during his final two years.


“While he can do some stuff on his own, he can’t do others,” said Jim Messina, Obama’s 2012 campaign manager. “Congress needs to act on some of these things.” Messina is now chairman of Organizing for Action, the group formed from Obama’s campaign to advocate for the president’s agenda.


The centerpiece of Obama’s plan is imposing the first-ever limits on carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants. This will require each state to draft its own compliance proposal, placing a major component of Obama’s legacy largely in the hands of governors and state policymakers, many of whom are deeply skeptical about the plan and what it could mean for local economies.


Obama knows the clock is ticking. Most of what he has proposed will take years to carry out, and he only calls the shots through 2016. So his aides, Cabinet secretaries and allies are fanning out, trying to start putting the plan in place as soon as possible.


The president took some steps almost immediately after unveiling his proposal. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz overhauled an $ 8 billion loan-guarantee program, one that had largely sat dormant for 5 years, to spur new technologies. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell approved a wind project in Arizona that the administration says will power up to 175,000 homes.


And the Environmental Protection Agency quickly sent a reworked proposal for emissions limits on new power plants to the White House.


When the Obama administration first proposed the limits last year, the energy industry balked, arguing the EPA was being heavy-handed because it used the same standard for natural gas as for coal. The industry argued this would mean a moratorium on new coal plants because the technology needed to retrofit plants to meet the standard isn’t commercially available or cost-effective.


The new version of the rule hasn’t been publicly released. But a senior White House official said the limits will now use different standards for natural gas and coal, essentially bowing to claims that the original rule was ill-conceived. The official was not authorized to divulge details about the rule ahead of its release and spoke on condition of anonymity.


Other steps have yet to be taken. The White House and the EPA are focusing on finishing the rules for new plants before they turn to the far trickier proposition of regulating existing plants.


Coordination and outreach to the 50 states won’t ramp up until the fall, the official said. Obama’s team insists it is confident it can convince states to go along with Obama’s plan.


Heather Zichal, Obama’s top energy and climate adviser, said important steps are being taken even in Republican-led states such as Texas and Utah, where local leaders have been confronted firsthand with drought and other environmental challenges blamed on climate change.


“The conversation outside the (Washington) Beltway is much different than the conversation inside the Beltway,” Zichal said. “You will see us trying to connect those dots.”


But don’t expect Obama to try to sell the plan in the same ways he did with immigration and health care. With climate change, Obama can’t fly around the country rallying Americans to demand their House members and senators vote yes on a bill. That’s because there isn’t one.


Even so, Obama has signaled he wants Americans engaged on the issue. He’s deployed his “Energy Cabinet” — Moniz, Jewell, his agriculture and EPA chiefs and others — around the country to explain what the administration is doing and why. The White House said Obama, too, will be part of that effort, although it hasn’t said whether he’ll travel or make big speeches to tout the plan.


Obama’s aides see parallels with gay marriage, arguing there’s been a dramatic shift in public opinion on climate change that benefits their side.


On some levels, they’re right. When AP-GfK asked Americans in November whether global warming, left unabated, would become a serious U.S. problem, 80 percent said it would — about the same as in 2009. In those three years, though, those who doubt climate change has been occurring have become less certain about it. In 2009, 52 percent of those who questioned climate change said they were sure it was false. In 2012, that figure dropped to 31 percent.


For Obama’s supporters, criticizing those who doubt climate change has become something of a sport — a rallying cry for the Democratic base the same way Obama’s so-called “war on coal” has become a conservative mantra. Organizing for Action, Messina’s group, is calling out every member of Congress who doubts the planet is getting warmer.


The challenges ahead are easy to spot. The authority Obama is invoking comes from the Clean Air Act, a labyrinthine 1960s-era law that’s never been used to regulate heat-trapping gases from existing power plants. The law says EPA must publish guidelines and give states time to create their own plans to meet those goals. Then the EPA gets to approve or reject those plans, setting up likely confrontations with Republican governors and some coal-state Democrats who want nothing to do with making life harder for local industry.


But if states simply refuse to propose their own plan, EPA gets to write the plan for them. It’s a heavy lift with echoes of Obama’s health care law, under which Washington will operate new insurance exchanges in more than half the states, after states refused to do so themselves.


“There’s absolutely no precedent here,” said Jeffrey Holmstead, who ran the EPA’s air and radiation division under President George W. Bush. “The EPA has been given the task of fitting a very large square peg into a very small round hole.”


___


AP Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta contributed to this report.


___


Reach Josh Lederman on Twitter: http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



For Obama"s climate plan, devil is in the details