Showing posts with label visit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label visit. Show all posts

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Top NATO commander cuts short U.S. visit, eyes on Russian troops




WASHINGTON Sun Mar 30, 2014 1:37pm EDT



U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel speaks during a retirement ceremony at the National Security Agency in Fort Meade, Maryland March 28, 2014. REUTERS/Brendan Smialowski/Pool

U.S. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel speaks during a retirement ceremony at the National Security Agency in Fort Meade, Maryland March 28, 2014.


Credit: Reuters/Brendan Smialowski/Pool




WASHINGTON (Reuters) – U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has sent America’s top general in Europe back early from a trip to Washington in what a spokesman on Sunday called a prudent step given Russia’s “lack of transparency” about troop movements across the border with Ukraine.


General Philip Breedlove, who is both NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe and the head of the U.S. military’s European Command, had been due to testify before Congress this week. Instead, he arrived in Europe Saturday evening and will be consulting with allies.


“(Hagel) considered Breedlove’s early return the prudent thing to do, given the lack of transparency and intent from Russian leadership about their military movements across the border,” Rear Admiral John Kirby, a Pentagon spokesman, told Reuters, which was first to report the decision.


“More broadly, he felt it was important for Gen. Breedlove to continue our efforts to consult with NATO allies, and to discuss specific ways to provide additional reassurance for our NATO allies in Eastern Europe.”


U.S. officials, speaking last week on condition of anonymity, expressed deep concern about the massing of what they estimate are up to 40,000 Russian troops on Ukraine’s border. That is stoking concerns in Washington and elsewhere that Russia is preparing a wider incursion into Ukraine after its annexation of Crimea.


The United States and EU have meted out two rounds of sanctions on Russia, including visa bans and asset freezes for some of Putin’s inner circle, to punish Moscow, and they have threatened further actions.


The U.S. military has also taken steps to reassure NATO allies, increasing the number of U.S. aircraft in regular NATO air patrols over the Baltics and beefing up a previously planned training exercise with the Polish air force. More steps are being considered.


Breedlove will meet with NATO foreign ministers at their April 1-2 conference in Brussels.


“The general’s return will allow him more time to confer closely with his staff and our allies and partners, and to better advise senior leaders,” Kirby said.


Hagel made the decision to send Breedlove back to Europe on Friday night, he said.


Breedlove arrived in Stuttgart on Saturday evening. He had been scheduled to testify before the Senate Armed Services Committee April 1 and the House Armed Services Committee on April 2.


“Congressional leaders were notified of Hagel’s decision,” Kirby said.


(Reporting by Phil Stewart; Editing by Jim Loney)






Reuters: Politics



Top NATO commander cuts short U.S. visit, eyes on Russian troops

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

VIDEO: ‘Obama Assassination’ Cartoon Prompts Secret Service Visit



posted on Feb, 24 2014 @ 08:20 PM




schuyler


alienreality
The pattern I see in these “threats to the president” are that our president is so corrupt, dishonest, and so pathetically morally and ethically bankrupt, that so many people are making these types of statements through various methods.. Says a lot about the current political state when so many people are doing these things.


Must be embarrassing to the president to be schooled so often that his actions are despised so much. And yet he continues on with the destruction of America.



The problem with this statement is that it reflects myopia and a lack of historical perspective. The same exact thing has been said in the past about nearly every president. In the campaign between John Adams (#2) and Thomas Jefferson (#3), for example, the rhetoric used would make present-day hyperbolic political campaigns seem tame and polite in comparison. You talk about the “destruction of America,” well, Lincoln actually succeeded, according to half the country at the time, and he was killed for it–after several unsuccessful attempts.


So threats are nothing new and it has nothing to do with the current incumbent. This is about the Presidency, not the President, but even so, he ought to be free of risk from crazed maniacs filled with hatred or who think killing someone famous will get them a date with Jody Foster. And, believe me, I am no fan of Obama or his policies. He’s a complete disaster, pure and simple, but I hope he and his successors live to a ripe old age.



My points were that people wouldn’t even be doing these things if the president wasn’t such a threat to everyone else. Just like Pol Pot was a threat to everyone else.
Our president shares a ton of similarities to the ousted Cambodian leader. Except he might not achieve as high a body count as Pol Pot, but time will tell.


I predict he will even get to live a life after his term expires, and live in luxury and free from any worry of accountability, just like the ousted Cambodian leader is doing right now.


Only a president can make himself “free from threat” by being an ethical and moral leader, and I think we all know that Obama isn’t going to ever be that..
So in my opinion, these things are happening because of his own actions. Are people nutz for threatening him still? Of course, but I am just pointing out the cause of it all. I am not saying I agree with it happening though..
I am just making these statements as an interested observer.


Add: And these threats have everything to do with the current incumbent, or are these people just targeting him randomly?
Again, I say I don’t agree with it, I am only seeing it happening..


edit on 24-2-2014 by alienreality because: add





AboveTopSecret.com New Topics In US Political Madness



VIDEO: ‘Obama Assassination’ Cartoon Prompts Secret Service Visit

Friday, February 21, 2014

Obama meets with Dalai Lama; visit rankles China







Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama acknowledges the audience before speaking at an event entitled: “Happiness, Free Enterprise, and Human Flourishing” Thursday, Feb. 20, 2014, at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama acknowledges the audience before speaking at an event entitled: “Happiness, Free Enterprise, and Human Flourishing” Thursday, Feb. 20, 2014, at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)





FILE – In this Feb. 18, 2010, file photo, The Dalai Lama walks out of the White House in Washington, after meeting with President Barack Obama. Obama will host Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama for a meeting on Feb. 21, 2014, the White House said, in a move that could rankle already tense relations between the U.S. and China. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)





Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama poses for a “selfie” with blogger and activist Alek Boyd during a break between panel discussions at an event entitled: “Happiness, Free Enterprise, and Human Flourishing” Thursday, Feb. 20, 2014, at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)













Buy AP Photo Reprints







(AP) — President Barack Obama met with the Dalai Lama at the White House Friday over the stern objection of China, which warned the meeting would “inflict grave damages” on the U.S. relationship with the Asian nation.


Obama greeted the Dalai Lama while the Tibetan spiritual leader and fellow Nobel laureate was in the U.S. on a speaking tour. The meeting was closed to photographers, and, unlike during some previous visits, the Dalai Lama departed the White House without speaking to reporters.


In a statement after the meeting, the White House said Obama offered his “strong support for the preservation of Tibet’s unique religious, cultural, and linguistic traditions” and for human rights protections for Tibetans in China. The Dalai Lama told Obama he’s not seeking Tibetan independence, and both leaders said they hoped talks would resume between Beijing and the Dalai Lama’s representatives.


When the White House announced the meeting late Thursday, China responded almost immediately, urging Obama to cancel it in what has become something of a diplomatic ritual whenever the president meets with the exiled Buddhist monk. In a biting statement, China’s government accused Obama of letting the Dalai Lama use the White House to promote anti-Chinese activities.


“It is a severe violation of the principles of international relations,” said Hua Chunying, a spokeswoman for China’s Foreign Ministry. “It will inflict grave damages upon the China-U.S. relationship.”


Beijing has often protested when world leaders have granted audiences to the Dalai Lama, including when Obama met with him in 2010 and again in 2011. Chinese officials denounce the Dalai Lama as a separatist responsible for instigating self-immolations by Tibetans inside China, but he is widely respected around the world for his advocacy of peace and tolerance.


Obama hosted the Dalai Lama in the White House’s Map Room, rather than the Oval Office, where the president traditionally brings a visiting leader for a round of photographs. The private meeting, closed to reporters despite media requests for access, suggested an attempt to avoid the appearance of a formal meeting between two heads of state.


The White House said Obama was meeting with the Dalai Lama in the visitor’s capacity as a cultural and religious leader. As if to indicate a reaction had been expected, officials reiterated that the U.S. recognizes Tibet as part of China and doesn’t support Tibetan independence.


At the same time, officials said they were concerned about tensions and deteriorating human rights in China’s Tibetan areas, urging Beijing to resume talks with the Dalai Lama or his followers without preconditions.


China bitterly opposes the Dalai Lama’s quest for greater Tibetan autonomy and is wary of Obama’s efforts to increase U.S. influence in the region.


Relations between the U.S. and China are already on edge over Beijing’s increasingly aggressive steps to assert itself in the region, including in territorial disputes with its smaller neighbors. China’s emergence as a leading global economic and military power has strained ties with Washington, and the two have also clashed over cybertheft and human rights.


A frequent visitor to the U.S., the Dalai Lama has lived in exile in northern India since fleeing China in 1959.


___


Zhao Liang in Beijing contributed to this report.


___


Reach Josh Lederman at http://twitter.com/joshledermanAP


Associated Press




Politics Headlines



Obama meets with Dalai Lama; visit rankles China

Sunday, February 2, 2014

DPM: UK Deputy Prime Minister brings 40-strong business envoy on trade visit to Latin America



Deputy Prime Minister press release


UK Deputy Prime Minister brings 40-strong business envoy on trade visit to Latin America


UK Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg will embark on a trade and investment visit to Colombia and Mexico from Monday 3 to Wednesday 5 February 2014. He will be the most senior British government minister to visit Colombia since 1992.


Leading a high-level delegation, the Deputy Prime Minister will be accompanied by Trade and Investment Minister Lord Livingston, Mexico Trade Envoy Baroness Bonham-Carter and more than 40 UK business leaders representing a wide range of sectors including global big-hitters such as banking giants HSBC, engine manufacturers Rolls Royce, commercial banknote printer De La Rue, oil and energy firm Shell, and innovative architects and designer architects Zaha Hadid. He will also be joined by senior representatives from UK universities Dundee, Edinburgh and Warwick.


Speaking ahead of his visit, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg said:


“The global influence of Colombia and Mexico, both politically and economically, is increasing at an incredible rate. It is by forging greater ties with countries like these that we can rebuild our economy; find new export markets for British businesses, identify new opportunities, and sign new contracts.


“The UK took its eye off the Latin American ball, and as a result we’ve fallen behind many of our other European competitors. Mexico and Colombia are two economies where the British presence has been too small, too reticent and too modest for far too long. There is so much we can do to catch up, and we’re making progress.


“Already we are major players as the second largest investor in Colombia and the fifth largest in Mexico. We’ve seen a 126% increase in the export relationship with Colombia between 2009-12, and a 9% increase in UK to Mexico exports in the last year alone.


“Yet despite all that progress, the commercial and trading relationship between our nations is still a fraction of what it could be. That’s why I’m so pleased to spearhead on behalf of the British government, a major delegation – the first of its kind to Colombia – from the UK from a huge diversity of sectors. This is a real message of intent.


“It’s been fashionable for a long time to talk about growth of major economies in Asia, but actually so much of new growth in the world economy will be in Latin America, in open, reforming economies such as Mexico and Colombia. Delegations and visits like this are important to the success of the relationship between Britain, Colombia and Mexico, and the long-term economic wellbeing to the UK for many years ahead.”


During his visit to Colombia the Deputy Prime Minister will meet with President Juan Manuel Santos to reinforce the increasingly strong political dialogue between the countries and discuss the growing economic relationship. In particular, there are growing science, innovation and education links between the UK and Colombia.


· UK goods and services exports to Colombia increased by 126% between 2009 and 2012, one of the highest growth rates in the world. This has helped towards the 2015 bilateral trade and investment target of £1.75 billion which has now been met.


· The Deputy Prime Minister will announce on his trip the new target of £4 billion of bilateral trade and investment by 2020.


In Mexico, the Deputy Prime Minister will meet with President Enrique Peña Nieto to reinforce bilateral relations built up from his previous visit in March 2011, and President Peña Nieto’s visit to the UK in June 2013. The legacy of this new era of UK-Mexico relations will bring the two societies even closer together with 2015 designated as the Year of the UK in Mexico and Year of Mexico in the UK.


* The trade and investment links between the UK and Mexico are well established; the UK is Mexico’s 5th largest investor, and in the first 11 months of 2013, UK export of goods to Mexico increased by 9% compared to the same period last year.


* The Deputy Prime Minister will be reiterating our commitment of reaching a bilateral trade target of £4.2 billion by the end of 2015, and announcing a new target to double the UK’s market share in Mexico to 1.5% by 2020.


Trade and Investment Minister Lord Livingston said:


“More and more British companies are exporting to Colombia and Mexico. UK exports of goods to Mexico increased by over 60% since 2009 and the export of services to Colombia has almost tripled since 2009.


“However, much more needs to be done to ensure UK companies can benefit from the huge opportunities these markets offer, particularly in the energy, infrastructure and education sectors. That is why we are taking one of the largest UK trade delegations so far to Mexico and Colombia.”




Press Releases



DPM: UK Deputy Prime Minister brings 40-strong business envoy on trade visit to Latin America

Friday, January 31, 2014

Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama plans to travel to Saudi Arabia in March on a mission to smooth tensions with Washington’s main Arab ally over U.S. policy on Iran’s nuclear program and the civil war in Syria, a newspaper reported.


Reuters: Top News



Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama plans to travel to Saudi Arabia in March on a mission to smooth tensions with Washington’s main Arab ally over U.S. policy on Iran’s nuclear program and the civil war in Syria, a newspaper reported.


Reuters: Top News



Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama plans to travel to Saudi Arabia in March on a mission to smooth tensions with Washington’s main Arab ally over U.S. policy on Iran’s nuclear program and the civil war in Syria, a newspaper reported.


Reuters: Top News



Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

(Reuters) – President Barack Obama plans to travel to Saudi Arabia in March on a mission to smooth tensions with Washington’s main Arab ally over U.S. policy on Iran’s nuclear program and the civil war in Syria, a newspaper reported.


Reuters: Top News



Obama to visit Saudi Arabia amid tensions over Iran, Syria: report

Thursday, December 26, 2013

WATCH: On the Day After Christmas, a Visit From Saint Ayn Rand [Fiore Cartoon]


Mark Fiore is a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial cartoonist and animator whose work has appeared in the Washington Post, the Los Angeles Times, the San Francisco Examiner, and dozens of other publications. He is an active member of the American Association of Editorial Cartoonists, and has a website featuring his work.



MoJo Blogs and Articles | Mother Jones



WATCH: On the Day After Christmas, a Visit From Saint Ayn Rand [Fiore Cartoon]

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Obamas, Clintons to visit JFK grave

People visit the eternal flame at the gravesite of former President John F. Kennedy as it burns at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Va. | AP Photo

Friday marks 50 years to the day since Kennedy was killed by a gunman in Dallas. | AP Photo





WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama will visit John F. Kennedy’s gravesite and honor two of Kennedy’s lasting initiatives as the nation observes the 50th anniversary of his assassination in the coming week.


Obama and his wife, Michelle, will be accompanied by former President Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary, at a wreath-laying ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery on Wednesday afternoon. Also that day, Obama will be joined by scores of prominent Americans who have received the Presidential Medal of Freedom in paying tribute to Kennedy’s legacy.







Kennedy established the modern version of the medal, the highest award the U.S. bestows on civilians, in the months before his death. He was killed two weeks before he planned to honor the inaugural group of recipients, and it fell to President Lyndon Johnson to preside over the ceremony at the White House on the day Kennedy’s family was moving out.


Since then more than 500 have received the medal.


Obama will present the award Wednesday to the 2013 recipients, including Bill Clinton, Oprah Winfrey, the late astronaut Sally Ride, women’s rights activist Gloria Steinem, baseball Hall of Famer Ernie Banks, country music singer Loretta Lynn and 10 others.


On Wednesday evening, Obama plans a speech on Kennedy’s legacy of service with a dinner at the Smithsonian American History Museum attended by current and past recipients of the medal, including baseball’s Hank Aaron, astronaut Buzz Aldrin, singer Aretha Franklin, economist Alan Greenspan, activist Jesse Jackson and former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.


Kennedy’s grandson, Jack Schlossberg, is to introduce Obama at the dinner. Other Kennedy members plan to attend, including Robert Kennedy’s daughter Kathleen Kennedy Townsend and former diplomat Jean Kennedy Smith, a former medal winner and John Kennedy’s last surviving sibling.


Friday marks 50 years to the day since Kennedy was killed by a gunman in Dallas. Obama will meet privately at the White House that day with leaders and volunteers from the Peace Corps program Kennedy established.


Details of Obama’s plans were provided by the White House to The Associated Press.


The Clintons’ presence at the eternal flame where Kennedy is buried is sure to spark speculation about whether Obama has a favorite in the 2016 race to succeed him.


For Hillary Clinton, his former secretary of state, her every move is examined for signs of whether she’ll run. Vice President Joe Biden, another potential candidate, plans to be at the medal ceremony and dinner but will not be at the grave.


President Harry Truman established an early version of the Medal of Freedom in 1945 to recognize those whose actions overseas advanced the national security of the United States or its allies, but it also could be bestowed by other top U.S. officials.


By executive order in February 1963, Kennedy made bestowing the Medal of Freedom a presidential privilege and expanded its scope to honor contributions to world peace, culture and other public interests.


According to the White House, Kennedy announced the inaugural list of 31 awardees on July 4, 1963, selecting opera singers, diplomats, academics and civic leaders. The medal design was finalized in the fall, and a ceremony was scheduled for Dec. 6. On Nov. 21, the day before the assassination, Kennedy’s special assistant forwarded a request to have the Marine String Orchestra play at the awards reception.


Johnson decided to move forward with the lunchtime ceremony in the State Dining Room and surprised the dignitaries in attendance by adding Kennedy and the recently deceased Pope John XXIII as posthumous recipients.


“In the shattering sequence of events that began 14 days ago, we encountered in its full horror man’s capacity for hatred and destruction,” Johnson said at the ceremony. “There is little we do not know of evil, but it is time to turn once more to the pursuits of honor and excellence and of achievement that have always marked the true direction of the American people.”


Jacqueline Kennedy declined Johnson’s plans to also award a medal to her. She watched from an anteroom as Attorney General Robert Kennedy accepted the medal on his brother’s behalf. That afternoon, Mrs. Kennedy and her children moved out of the White House.




POLITICO – TOP Stories



Obamas, Clintons to visit JFK grave

Sunday, October 27, 2013

FBI Visit Teen Over Police State Video on YouTube

Featured Video: Conspiracy Theorist News and Updates –



In another shocking example of how the federal government is repositioning itself as a secret police force to target political dissidents, a 16-year-old boy …
Video Rating: 4 / 5



FBI Visit Teen Over Police State Video on YouTube

Wednesday, September 25, 2013

US Won’t Let Pakistani Drone Victims’ Lawyer Visit for Congressional Testimony



US Won’t Let Pakistani Drone Victims’ Lawyer Visit for Congressional Testimony


State Dept Derailing Congressional Hearing on Drones


by Jason Ditz, September 24, 2013




A Congressional hearing on CIA drone strikes is planned next week, but it’s going to have to go on without testimony from human rights lawyer and Foundation for Fundamental Fights director Shahzad Akbar, because the US State Department won’t let him.


Akbar is representing multiple children injured in a US drone strike in North Waziristan, an attack which also killed their grandmother. Akbar and his clients were invited to the hearing.


Akbar sees the move as a deliberate attempt to keep him from testifying, and says he had a US diplomatic visa for two years in the past, and had never had a problem getting permission to visit the US until he started representing drone strike victims.


Rep. Alan Grayson (D – FL) condemned the State Department’s move, saying they had given no excuse for why Akbar shouldn’t be allowed in. “We have a chronic problem in Congress that when the administration is involved in one side of the issue, we rarely hear the other side of the issue,” Grayson noted.


Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz






News From Antiwar.com



US Won’t Let Pakistani Drone Victims’ Lawyer Visit for Congressional Testimony

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Brazil"s president cancels U.S. state visit over spying




  • The White House says the state visit will be rescheduled

  • Recent disclosures alleged NSA spying in the South American country



(CNN) — Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff has postponed her scheduled state visit to meet with President Barack Obama next month because of National Security Agency intelligence activities in the South American country, the White House said Tuesday.


Rousseff had planned to come to Washington on October 23, but she and Obama “agreed to postpone” the visit because they don’t want it to be “overshadowed by a single bilateral issue, no matter how important or challenging the issue may be,” a White House statement said, adding the trip would be rescheduled.


Brazil’s government has protested to Washington about recent disclosures of U.S. spying. The White House statement said Obama has ordered a thorough review of American intelligence activities, but acknowledged that would take months.




CNN.com – Politics



Brazil"s president cancels U.S. state visit over spying

Thursday, September 5, 2013

Brazil cancels preparations for President Rousseff US visit




Published time: September 05, 2013 13:33

Brazil

Brazil’s President Dilma Rousseff and US President Barack Obama (Still from RT video)




Brazil has canceled preparations for the visit of President Dilma Rousseff to the United States over reports she was the target of National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance, AFP reports.


A presidential spokesperson said a trip by a Brazilian delegation to prepare for the president’s October 23 visit to Washington “was cancelled.”


Following the spying revelations, a Brazilian official told Reuters on Wednesday that Rousseff was set to take punitive in addition to canceling the visit, which could include a halt on plans to purchase F-18 Super Hornet fighters from Chicago-based Boeing Co.


“She is completely furious,” the official said.


“This is a major, major crisis …. There needs to be an apology. It needs to be public. Without that, it’s basically impossible for her to go to Washington in October,” the official continued.


On Wednesday, Brazil announced an investigation into domestic telecommunications firms had been launched to determine if they had illegally shared data with the NSA after it was discovered the agency had been spying on Rousseff.


A Brazilian news program on Sunday said the NSA had spied on emails, phone calls and text messages of both Rousseff and Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto. The report by Globo TV was based on documents leaked by fugitive former NSA contractor Edward Snowden.


“It is clear in several ways that [Rousseff’s] communications were intercepted, including the use of DNI Presenter, which is a program used by NSA to open and read emails and online chats,” Glenn Greenwald, the Brazilian based Guardian journalist who helped break the Snowden leaks, told AP in an email.


The Brazilian government denounced the NSA surveillance as “impermissible and unacceptable” and a violation of Brazilian sovereignty.


The American ambassador to Brazil, Thomas Shannon, denied reports the NSA was monitoring communications on Brazilian territory or collaborating with local telecommunications companies after he was summoned by the government to answer for the spying allegations.





RT – News



Brazil cancels preparations for President Rousseff US visit

Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Dubious Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria Coincides With UN Visit


Red line? Past evidence shows western-backed rebels were behind biological attacks


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
August 21, 2013


Dubious claims that Bashar Al-Assad’s forces launched a massive chemical weapons attack near Damascus coincide with a team of UN investigators entering Syria and could provide the long awaited “red line” necessary to justify direct NATO military intervention.


“More than 200 people have been killed in an alleged chemical weapons attack near Damascus, reports Sky News. “Activists claim “toxic gas” was used by President Bashar al Assad’s forces during a bombardment of rebel-held areas outside the Syrian capital. It comes three days after a 20-strong team of UN weapons inspectors arrived in Damascus to investigate whether chemical weapons have been used in the conflict.”


The extent of the “evidence” behind such claims rests on a 22 second video that shows children being treated for apparent breathing difficulties.


The Assad government responded by slamming the reports as “false” and claiming they were aimed at distracting UN inspectors.


Charles Lister, an analyst at IHS Jane’s Terrorism and Insurgency Center, told the Jerusalem Post that the timing of such an attack raises eyebrows. “Logically, it would make little sense for the Syrian government to employ chemical agents at such a time, particularly given the relatively close proximity of the targeted towns (to the UN team),” he said.


As we have documented for well over a year, the inevitability of a chemical weapons attack has been consistently hyped by the media despite the fact that by engaging in such actions, the Assad regime would guarantee international condemnation and create a casus belli for its own destruction.


The fact that launching indiscriminate biological attacks makes absolutely no sense militarily for Assad means it’s far more likely that such attacks are being staged by rebels – many of whom are being led by bloodthirsty Al-Qaeda terrorists – with support from the likes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.


Indeed, the strongest evidence suggests that chemical weapons attacks are being launched by western-backed rebels, but such reports have received scant media attention in comparison to claims such as today’s.


Back in May, UN human rights investigator Carla del Ponte said that according to evidence her team had gathered, “The rebels have used chemical weapons, making use of sarin gas.”


Two months earlier, an audio recording emerged of a phone conversation between two members of the Free Syrian Army during which discussion centered around a plan to carry out a chemical weapons attack capable of impacting an area the size of one kilometer.


Video also emerged last year showing opposition rebels killing rabbits after dispersing an unidentified chemical weapon into a glass box.


Other major attacks initially blamed on the Syrian Army were later to proven to be the work of anti-Assad militants, such as the Houla massacre.


As we have exhaustively documented, western support for the FSA has intensified in recent months despite the fact that the rebels are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists who routinely commit beheadings, ransack Christian churches, conduct terrorists bombings against innocent people, all while burning US flags and chanting anti-American slogans while singing the praises of Osama Bin Laden.


We predicted on numerous occasions that a massive chemical weapons attack would be blamed on the Assad regime to provide a justification for direct US and NATO military involvement in Syria.


Almost a year ago we wrote about a “false flag plot to frame President Bashar Al-Assad’s forces for launching a chemical weapons attack as a pre-cursor to a NATO intervention.”


Back in June we also also covered a Wall Street Journal report which revealed how the CIA was moving weapons from secret warehouses to Jordan ahead of an August offensive in Syria.


While it remains unclear whether these claims will be exploited as the primary justification for a military assault, blanket mainstream media coverage will ensure they will be used to intensify international pressure on the Assad government.


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


Related posts:


  1. ‘Syria moves chemical weapons, won’t use them on Israel’

  2. Western officials: No proof Assad used chemical weapons in Syria

  3. Syria accuses Turkey of supplying rebels with chemical weapons

  4. Syria: Chemical weapons only for foreign attack

  5. ‘Russia convinced Syria will not use chemical weapons’

This article was posted: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 at 5:54 am









Prison Planet.com



Dubious Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria Coincides With UN Visit

Dubious Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria Coincides With UN Visit


Red line? Past evidence shows western-backed rebels were behind biological attacks


Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
August 21, 2013


Dubious claims that Bashar Al-Assad’s forces launched a massive chemical weapons attack near Damascus coincide with a team of UN investigators entering Syria and could provide the long awaited “red line” necessary to justify direct NATO military intervention.


“More than 200 people have been killed in an alleged chemical weapons attack near Damascus, reports Sky News. “Activists claim “toxic gas” was used by President Bashar al Assad’s forces during a bombardment of rebel-held areas outside the Syrian capital. It comes three days after a 20-strong team of UN weapons inspectors arrived in Damascus to investigate whether chemical weapons have been used in the conflict.”


The extent of the “evidence” behind such claims rests on a 22 second video that shows children being treated for apparent breathing difficulties.


The Assad government responded by slamming the reports as “false” and claiming they were aimed at distracting UN inspectors.


Charles Lister, an analyst at IHS Jane’s Terrorism and Insurgency Center, told the Jerusalem Post that the timing of such an attack raises eyebrows. “Logically, it would make little sense for the Syrian government to employ chemical agents at such a time, particularly given the relatively close proximity of the targeted towns (to the UN team),” he said.


As we have documented for well over a year, the inevitability of a chemical weapons attack has been consistently hyped by the media despite the fact that by engaging in such actions, the Assad regime would guarantee international condemnation and create a casus belli for its own destruction.


The fact that launching indiscriminate biological attacks makes absolutely no sense militarily for Assad means it’s far more likely that such attacks are being staged by rebels – many of whom are being led by bloodthirsty Al-Qaeda terrorists – with support from the likes of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.


Indeed, the strongest evidence suggests that chemical weapons attacks are being launched by western-backed rebels, but such reports have received scant media attention in comparison to claims such as today’s.


Back in May, UN human rights investigator Carla del Ponte said that according to evidence her team had gathered, “The rebels have used chemical weapons, making use of sarin gas.”


Two months earlier, an audio recording emerged of a phone conversation between two members of the Free Syrian Army during which discussion centered around a plan to carry out a chemical weapons attack capable of impacting an area the size of one kilometer.


Video also emerged last year showing opposition rebels killing rabbits after dispersing an unidentified chemical weapon into a glass box.


Other major attacks initially blamed on the Syrian Army were later to proven to be the work of anti-Assad militants, such as the Houla massacre.


As we have exhaustively documented, western support for the FSA has intensified in recent months despite the fact that the rebels are being led by Al-Qaeda terrorists who routinely commit beheadings, ransack Christian churches, conduct terrorists bombings against innocent people, all while burning US flags and chanting anti-American slogans while singing the praises of Osama Bin Laden.


We predicted on numerous occasions that a massive chemical weapons attack would be blamed on the Assad regime to provide a justification for direct US and NATO military involvement in Syria.


Almost a year ago we wrote about a “false flag plot to frame President Bashar Al-Assad’s forces for launching a chemical weapons attack as a pre-cursor to a NATO intervention.”


Back in June we also also covered a Wall Street Journal report which revealed how the CIA was moving weapons from secret warehouses to Jordan ahead of an August offensive in Syria.


While it remains unclear whether these claims will be exploited as the primary justification for a military assault, blanket mainstream media coverage will ensure they will be used to intensify international pressure on the Assad government.


Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet


*********************


Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.


Related posts:


  1. ‘Syria moves chemical weapons, won’t use them on Israel’

  2. Western officials: No proof Assad used chemical weapons in Syria

  3. Syria accuses Turkey of supplying rebels with chemical weapons

  4. Syria: Chemical weapons only for foreign attack

  5. ‘Russia convinced Syria will not use chemical weapons’

This article was posted: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 at 5:54 am









Prison Planet.com



Dubious Chemical Weapons Attack In Syria Coincides With UN Visit

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Japan ministers in Yasukuni visit


Japanese lawmakers visit the Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo on 15 August 2013Lawmakers’ visits anger Japan’s neighbours, who say they glorify militarism


Two Japanese cabinet ministers have visited the controversial Yasukuni shrine in Tokyo on the anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II.


Prime Minister Shinzo Abe sent a ritual offering but was expected to stay away, in an apparent move intended to avoid inflaming tensions with neighbours.


The shrine commemorates Japan’s war dead but also honours several convicted war criminals.


Previous visits by politicians have angered China and South Korea.


They see the shrine as a symbol of Japan’s war-time aggression.


‘General judgement’

Early on Thursday’s Mr Abe’s ministers for internal affairs and the North Korea issue, Yoshitaka Shindo and Keiji Furuya, visited the shrine in central Tokyo to pay their respects.


More lawmakers were expected to visit during the day.


Mr Abe, who visited the shrine in October 2012 when he was the leader of the opposition, sent a ritual offering with an aide but was not expected in person.



Yasukuni Shrine


  • Built in 1869 under the Emperor Meiji

  • Venerates the souls of Japan’s war dead

  • Those enshrined include war criminals

  • Japan’s neighbours say it represents the country’s past militarism


“The leader wanted to pass along his prayers for the people who died in the war and apologise for not making a personal visit,” Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) official Koichi Hagiuda said.


“He considered from various angles and made a general judgement not to come to pray today,” the official, who made the offering on behalf of Mr Abe, added.


The shrine commemorates some 2.5 million Japanese men, women and children who died for their country in wars.


But the souls of 14 Class A convicted war criminals from World War II are also enshrined there, including Prime Minister General Hideki Tojo, who was executed for war crimes in 1948.


The shrine is also deeply political, reports the BBC’s Rupert Wingfield-Hayes from Tokyo. Today its history museum continues to peddle a version of World War II history that either ignores or denies the crimes committed by Japan in Korea and China.


Visits to the shrine by lawmakers anger and offend Japan’s neighbours, to whom the shrine represents Japan’s past militarism, including the colonisation of the Korean peninsula and the invasion of China.


This year’s anniversary comes with ties tense between Tokyo and governments in Beijing and Seoul. China and Japan remain locked in a bitter dispute over East China Sea islands that both claim.


South Korea and Japan, meanwhile, are involved in a row over an island midway between the two over which both say they have sovereignty.




BBC News – Asia



Japan ministers in Yasukuni visit

Friday, August 2, 2013

In overture to China, Japan PM may skip visit to war dead shrine


Japan

Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe speaks to voters during a campaign for the July 21 Upper House election in Funabashi, east of Tokyo, in this July 19, 2013 file photo.


Credit: Reuters/Toru Hanai/Files






TOKYO | Fri Aug 2, 2013 2:16am EDT



TOKYO (Reuters) – Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe will likely skip visiting a shrine for war dead on a traditional remembrance day this month, a move he hopes will open the door to a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping and mend badly frayed ties.


Whether Xi, faced with huge domestic challenges, is willing or able to risk responding to the overture remains in doubt. But relations between the world’s second- and third-largest economies have now been hostile for months, with a row over disputed islands adding to wartime bitterness and a regional rivalry.


China and South Korea, occupied or colonized by Japan in the 20th century, are especially touchy about visits to Yasukuni Shrine by Japanese leaders because it also honors people convicted as war criminals by an Allied tribunal.


Conservatives like Abe say it is only natural to pay respects there to those who died for their country, especially on Aug 15, the anniversary of Japan’s defeat in World War Two. Tokyo hopes that if Abe stays away on the day, it would score points in Beijing.


“Now is the most delicate time,” said a government source with knowledge of discussions between Japan and China, who did not want to be identified because of the sensitivity of the subject. “It may be that when a leaders’ summit takes place, we look back and say ‘that was the start’.”


Abe, 58, is keen to replicate one of the few successes of his troubled 2006-2007 term, when he thawed Sino-Japanese ties after a five-year chill during the tenure of his predecessor, Junichiro Koizumi, diplomatic experts say.


“Despite the hawkish persona that he puts forward, in 2006 he was the guy who began the post-Koizumi reconciliation process,” said Sheila Smith, a senior fellow at the U.S.-based Council on Foreign Relations. “He sees himself as a statesman in the sense of being effective on the diplomatic scene.”


Sino-Japanese ties went into a deep-freeze during Koizumi’s term partly because of his annual visits to Yasukuni.


The deeply conservative Abe was able to warm up relations thereafter by never saying whether he would or would not visit Yasukuni, but in fact, staying away while in office.


Abe has since said he regretted that decision and visited Yasukuni after becoming ruling party leader in September.


Even if he does not visit the shrine in August, he would face pressure from his conservative base to visit the religious complex in central Tokyo in October at an autumn festival.


CREATIVE AMBIGUITY


Chinese state media, however, have issued a barrage of invective against Abe in recent weeks even as back-door diplomacy took place over repairing ties. The country’s Foreign Ministry has accused him of simply “chanting empty slogans” in his push for talks with Xi.


China – which officially denies that any talks on a possible summit are taking place and shown no public signs of wanting one – may want assurances that Abe won’t attend the shrine once a summit is done and dusted.


“The question of timing is pretty critical,” CFR’s Smith said. “If Abe goes (to Yasukuni) in October, it is disastrous for Xi if they are talking about a summit in September.”


Japan-China ties took their latest nose-dive after Abe’s predecessor nationalized the uninhabited isles in the East China Sea that are controlled by Japan but claimed by both countries.


Still, several Japanese politicians and officials, starting with Abe’s junior coalition partner in January, have visited Beijing since he returned to office in December.


Plans for a trip to Beijing in May by Masahiko Komura, the vice president of Abe’s Liberal Democratic Party were dropped after Finance Minister Taro Aso, who is also deputy prime minister, Taro Aso, visited Yasukuni in April.


But the diplomatic pace picked up in June, when Abe’s foreign policy adviser Shotaro Yachi visited Beijing. Another adviser, Isao Iijima, followed suit last month ahead of an upper house election that cemented Abe’s grip on power.


And on Tuesday, Japanese Vice Foreign Minister Akitaka Saiki, met Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing.


For the leaders to meet, though, diplomats would have to exercise some deft verbal footwork find a formula that allows them to dial down tensions over the disputed East China Sea isles, known as the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyu in China.


Japanese and Chinese ships and planes have been playing a risky game of cat-and-mouse near the islands, and activists from both sides are eyeing trips to the area around Aug 15.


China wants Japan first to acknowledge that a formal dispute over sovereignty exists, experts say, a step that Tokyo has rejected for fear it would undermine its claim.


Ambiguity could well be the easiest path to avoiding domestic backlashes, especially in China where public antipathy to Japan is running high. “Face-saving is involved,” said a former Japanese diplomat. “Creative nuances might be necessary.”


September could be one window for a summit, but skeptics note that Xi has his hands full with an economic slowdown, planned economic reforms, an anti-corruption campaign and a party plenum in September or October.


Doubts in Beijing about Abe’s sincerity also run deep.


“Abe is being two-faced,” said Li Xiushi at the Shanghai Institute of International Studies, which advises the government on foreign policy. “On one hand, he wants to strengthen the containment of China in the global arena … On the other hand, he wants to pretend to the international and domestic audience: ‘See how good my attitude is. I’m willing to negotiation. Only China is the tough one.’ He wants to create this illusion.”


(Additional reporting by and Sui-Lee Wee and Ben Blanchard in Beijing, and Antoni Slodkowski in Tokyo; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)





Reuters: Most Read Articles



In overture to China, Japan PM may skip visit to war dead shrine

Friday, June 28, 2013

Obama"s ties to Mandela loom over S. Africa visit



(AP) — Inspired by Nelson Mandela’s struggles in South Africa, a young Barack Obama joined campus protests in the U.S. against the racist rule that kept Mandela locked away in prison for nearly three decades.


Now a historic, barrier-breaking figure himself, President Obama arrived in South Africa Friday to find a country drastically transformed by Mandela’s influence — and grappling with the beloved 94-year-old’s mortality.


It was unclear whether Mandela’s deteriorating health would allow Obama to make a hospital visit. The former South African leader is battling a recurring lung infection and is said to be in critical condition at a hospital in the South African capital of Pretoria.


Speaking to reporters on Air Force One as he made his way to Johannesburg, Obama said he would gauge the situation after he arrived.


“I don’t need a photo-op,” he said. “And the last thing I want to do is to be in any way obtrusive at a time when the family is concerned about Nelson Mandela’s condition.”


Obama’s visit to South Africa is seen as something of a tribute to the man who helped inspire his own political activism. The president will pay homage to Mandela at Robben Island, the prison where he spent 18 of his 27 years in prison. And with South Africa’s ruling party, the African National Congress, facing questions about its effectiveness, Obama will urge the government and the South African people to live up to the democratic example set by their first black president.


“He’s a personal hero, but I don’t think I’m unique in that regard,” Obama said during a news conference Thursday in Senegal, the first stop on his weeklong Africa trip. “I think he’s a hero for the world. And if and when he passes from this place, one thing I think we’ll all know is that his legacy is one that will linger on throughout the ages.”


Obama and Mandela have met just once, a hastily arranged meeting in a Washington hotel room in 2005 when Obama was a U.S. senator. A photo of the meeting hangs in Obama’s personal office at the White House, showing a smiling Mandela sitting on a chair, his legs outstretched, as the young senator reaches down to shake his hand. A copy of the photo also hangs in Mandela’s office in Johannesburg.


Since then, the two have spoken occasionally by telephone, including after the 2008 election, when Mandela called Obama to congratulate him on his victory. The U.S. president called Mandela in 2010 after the South African leader’s young granddaughter was killed in a car accident. Obama also wrote the introduction to Mandela’s memoir, “Conversations With Myself.”


Despite the two men’s infrequent contact, people close to Obama say his one-on-one meeting with Mandela left a lasting impression.


“He is one of the few people who the president has respected and admired from afar who, when he met him, exceeded his expectations,” said Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s senior adviser and close friend.


Obama’s own political rise has drawn inevitable comparisons to the South African leader. Both are Nobel Peace Prize winners and the first black men elected to lead their countries.


But their paths to power have been vastly different. While Mandela fought to end an oppressive government from the confines of a prison cell, Obama attended elite schools and rose through the U.S. political system before running for president.


“President Obama would believe that the challenges he has faced pale in comparison to those faced by President Mandela,” Jarrett said.


Mandela had already shaped Obama’s political beliefs well before their first encounter. As a student at Occidental College in Los Angeles, Obama joined protests against the school’s investments during South Africa’s apartheid era. In 1981, Obama focused his first public political speech on the topic.


“It’s happening an ocean away,” Obama said, according to a retelling of the story in his memoir “Dreams From My Father.” ”But it’s a struggle that touches each and every one of us. Whether we know it or not. Whether we want it or not.”


More than 30 years later, as he traveled through the African continent, Obama recalled the influence Mandela had had on him during that period of his life.


“I think at that time I didn’t necessarily imagine that Nelson Mandela might be released,” Obama said Thursday. But the president said he had read Mandela’s writings and speeches and understood him to be a man who believed in “treating people equally and was willing to sacrifice his life for that belief.”


Following his release from prison, Mandela was elected president in 1994 during South Africa’s first all-races elections. He served just one term, focusing in large part on racial reconciliation in the post-apartheid era, and retreated from public life several years ago.


The most recent images of him depict a frail man apparently approaching the end of his life. While South Africans have long been loath to talk about Mandela’s inevitable death, there is now a growing sense in the country that the time is near. Well-wishers have delivered flowers and messages of support to the Pretoria hospital where he is being treated, and prayer sessions have been held around the country.


___


Follow Julie Pace at http://twitter.com/jpaceDC


Associated Press



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | Amazon Affiliate software for Amazon Store websites | Android Forums | WordPress Tutorials

Top Headlines

Obama"s ties to Mandela loom over S. Africa visit