Showing posts with label laws. Show all posts
Showing posts with label laws. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2014

Ted Cruz On Laws

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Ted Cruz On Laws

‘Sovereign citizen’ fails to persuade judge that medieval laws give him claim to empty homes

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



‘Sovereign citizen’ fails to persuade judge that medieval laws give him claim to empty homes

Thursday, March 13, 2014

BREAKING: Idaho legislators vote on emergency bill to nullify federal gun laws- Awaits Governor’s signature

At Not Just The News, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Not Just The News and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Not Just The News makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Not Just The News does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Not Just The News.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Not Just The News and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Not Just The News send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Not Just The News has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Not Just The News"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



BREAKING: Idaho legislators vote on emergency bill to nullify federal gun laws- Awaits Governor’s signature

Monday, March 3, 2014

Americans Hate Uganda"s Hate Laws

At Alternate Viewpoint, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by Alternate Viewpoint and how it is used.


Log Files


Like many other Web sites, Alternate Viewpoint makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.


Cookies and Web Beacons


Alternate Viewpoint does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.


DoubleClick DART Cookie


  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on Alternate Viewpoint.

  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to Alternate Viewpoint and other sites on the Internet.

  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on Alternate Viewpoint send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.


Alternate Viewpoint has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.


You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. Alternate Viewpoint"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.


If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.



Americans Hate Uganda"s Hate Laws

Friday, February 21, 2014

De BlasioĆ¢€™s Caravan Caught Speeding, Violating Traffic Laws


Another day, another set of outrageous examples of official disregard for the laws us little folk have to follow ‘or else’.

It’s certainly not that public figures flout traffic laws or that they do so openly and with little concern for the “Let them eat cake” message that incresingly sends to a public, growing less tolerant of it. After all, had this ONLY been about the new Mayor’s convoy blowing traffic laws like they were just kind suggestions, it wouldn’t be news at all.


Indeed..We must add a big cup of hypocrisy to make a true Sundae with a Cherry on top!


Sub-Title: Embarrassment Comes Just Days After Mayor Announced New Traffic Safety Initiative


NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) — Just days after Mayor Bill de Blasio announced an aggressive plan to prevent traffic deaths, CBS 2 cameras caught the driver of a car carrying the mayor violating a number of traffic laws.


But the NYPD responded Thursday evening that the mayor’s caravan, which is operated by police, sometimes has to use special driving techniques for protective reasons.



But of course…. ‘We must endanger you folks in the public as a necessary evil of insuring this one man is kept safe, above and beyond yourselves.’ We understand…They’re more important. Yes.. We do get it.


When the mayor announced his 62-point safe streets initiative, which includes lowering the speed limit to 25 mph, he said, “We want the public to know that we are holding ourselves to this standard.”


But Kramer reported the mayor failed to practice what he preached Thursday.


CBS 2 crews found Mayor de Blasio’s cars going through a stop sign at a Queens intersection, and that wasn’t the only traffic violation caught on tape.



Source

Some days, commentary isn’t even needed. No explanation for the obvious. It is, after all, obvious. I didn’t make up what the man said about holding himself to the same standard…hours before doing just the opposite. That’s the kind of statement they need to make, in their own words, to be taken seriously for what it is.


Yikes!




AboveTopSecret.com New Topics In US Political Madness



De Blasio’s Caravan Caught Speeding, Violating Traffic Laws

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Ukraine responds to mass protests by passing tough anti-protests laws





Ukraine’s pro-government lawmakers on Thursday pushed through parliament tough legislation in an apparent bid to suppress protests against President Viktor Yanukovych.


The opposition, which has been spearheading nearly two months of rallies against Yanukovych over his decision to ditch a key pact with the European Union, branded the vote “a power grab.”


According to the new legislation backed by 235 out of 450 lawmakers, a blockade of public buildings would be punishable by up to five years in prison.


The legislation also simplified a procedure to prosecute lawmakers.


According to the new law, protesters wearing masks or helmets will face a fine or an administrative arrest.


Dissemination of slander on the Internet was also banned and would be punishable by a fine or corrective labor of up to one year.


The sweeping legislation caused an outcry among opposition leaders who fear that the government would use the new legislation to prosecute them and break up the protest movement.


More from GlobalPost: Ukraine’s Greek Catholic Church stares down government, and wins


“The regime of Viktor Yanukovych and the Regions Party have completely destroyed state power in Ukraine,” said Arseniy Yatsenyuk, leader of Batkivshchyna (Fatherland) party.


“This is nothing else but an overthrow of the constitutional system and a power grab in Ukraine.”


Last month, hundreds of thousands took to the streets in the capital Kyiv and western Ukraine after Yanukovych decided to scrap key political and trade agreements with the EU.


The protests have since dwindled but the opposition maintains a protest camp on Kyiv’s central Independence Square known locally as the Maidan.


Opposition lawmakers sought to disrupt the vote but pro-Yanukovych parliament members voted by a show of hands, provoking concern from foreign officials.


“I am concerned about the way some laws were voted in parliament today. Norms should be adopted through proper procedures,” said the EU’s ambassador to Ukraine, Jan Tombinski.


“Otherwise the credibility of democratic institutions and of the legal system is at stake.”


“I am concerned about the way some laws were voted on in parliament today,” US ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt added on Twitter.


http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/europe/140116/ukraine-responds-mass-protests-passing-tough-anti-protests-laws




GlobalPost – Home



Ukraine responds to mass protests by passing tough anti-protests laws

Japan Remains Hotbed of TPP Protest as U.S. Tries to Fast-Track Trade Deal, Crush Environmental Laws



Transcript



This is a rush transcript. Copy may not be in its final form.



AMY GOODMAN: We just got this breaking news out of Hollywood: The Oscar nominees for best documentary have been named. Among them is Dirty Wars. It’s produced by Jeremy Scahill of Democracy Now!, Rick Rowley, the director, and co-written with David Riker, the remarkable film about U.S. secret wars in Somalia, as well as in Yemen, in Afghanistan, as well. It’s among the five named, also Act of Killing by Josh Oppenheimer; Cutie and the Boxer; The Square, about the Egyptian uprising; and 20 Feet from Stardom. Those are the five nominees for the Oscar. You can go to our website to see interviews with some of the directors of some of these films at democracynow.org.


Well, we are broadcasting from Tokyo. Japan has been a hotbed of protest against the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which would establish a free trade zone stretching from the United States to Chile to Japan, and encompass nearly 40 percent of the global economy. Now, new documents released by WikiLeaks show the White House may be ready to backtrack on a series of critical regulations in order to secure a deal on the trade pact. These include legally binding requirements for pollution limits, logging standards, and a ban on harvesting of shark fins. The draft version of the “environmental chapter” also reveals that the U.S. and 11 other Pacific Rim nations that are party to the TPP would rely on trade sanctions instead of fines if a country violates its obligations. The Sierra Club responded to the latest news, saying if the draft report were to be finalized, quote, “President Obama’s environmental trade record would be worse than George W. Bush’s.”


Well, all of this comes as hearings begin today in the U.S. Congress on legislation to establish Fast Track authority that would allow President Obama to sign the TPP before Congress votes on it.


For more, we’re joined here in our Tokyo studio by Nobuhiko Suto, a former member of the Japanese Diet. He was on the Committee on Foreign Affairs in Japan’s House of Representatives, where he was among the first legislators to point out the dangers of the TPP. He’s the secretary-general of the group Citizen’s Congress for Opposing the Transpacific Partnership.


Welcome to Democracy Now! It’s very good to have you with us.


NOBUHIKO SUTO: I’m very honored to be here.


AMY GOODMAN: Why are you so concerned about the TPP?


NOBUHIKO SUTO: Well, at the initial impression of the TPP, as a concept, it was—I think it was OK. You know, that sounds quite good. Since I was an economist by education, and I was a professor of a university, teaching international political economy, before joining politics, so my first impression was TPP is the enlargement of a free trade system—it is good.


But just before the opening of APEC meeting, which was held in Yokohama three years ago, there came our Indonesian delegation, composed of the minister of commerce and some others. And they asked me, knowing that I am a friend of the prime minister, to ask prime minister not to say joining to TPP negotiations. So I was very surprised and shocked. “Why? Why you say so?” They responded that Indonesia is a country of scattered islands, so they are composed of different ethnicities, the races, and so on and so forth, so this is a very sensitive issue. And they have a, you know, different strategy, different policies to each ethnicities. So, that will be undermined by participating into TPP, so that’s the reason why Indonesia will not participate into TPP. And I was very surprised, and started studying about the risk of TPP.


But simultaneously, there’s so many of my friends in South Korea, Korean politicians, also pointing out the, you know, problems of a free trade agreement with the United States. And because of the FTAA, you know, the Korean industries and Korean farming industries are all devastated. And when I visited the United States for discussing about the TPP issue, almost all representatives of USTR—Mr. Marantis and [inaudible], everyone—everyone said, “Please study about U.S.-Korea free trade agreement, and the TPP will be more—you know, higher standard to be charged to participating countries.” So, I really understood the difficulties of the TPP.


AMY GOODMAN: How, specifically, will TPP affect Japan?


NOBUHIKO SUTO: Well, at the initial stage, the widespread, you know, understanding of TPP is that, you know, if Japan take off any tax and duties on rice, and the Japanese rice is about seven times higher than international rice, so that, as a result, Japanese farming industries, farmers and especially rice croppers, they will be devastated. So, the government, you know, adverts that this TPP is an issue between the agriculture industry and export industry.


AMY GOODMAN: Nobuhiko Suto, we have Lori Wallach on the phone right now. She is in the U.S. Congress.


NOBUHIKO SUTO: Yes, sure.


AMY GOODMAN: And there is a hearing taking place right now. Lori, thank you so much for joining us. Lori Wallach is director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch. In these last few minutes, can you talk about what’s happening today in Congress and why you’re so concerned about the Trans-Pacific Partnership that would extend from, well, where we are now, in Tokyo, Japan, all the way through to Chile?


LORI WALLACH: Well, the agreement is having some, I would say, interesting times in the Senate today, because there’s a hearing, the first hearing on Fast Track. Fast Track is the authority that President Obama is seeking to railroad the TPP through Congress. TPP has so many potentially damaging elements that would be bad for the U.S., as well, for most people here, that the president has decided he needs this dreadfully extreme, Nixon-era process that basically takes away all of Congress’s normal prerogatives concerning legislation, and railroads a trade agreement through. It’s rarely been used, but, for instance, it was used to push NAFTA through, over public and congressional objections. So, the first hearing on Fast Track, a bill got submitted last week to implement Fast Track again. It’s not been in effect, but for five years in the last 20, and now Obama is trying to get it back to be able to get TPP enacted. And that hearing is in the Senate Finance Committee.


AMY GOODMAN: And the significance, Lori Wallach, of the WikiLeaks release of the draft document?


LORI WALLACH: Explosive. That’s going to be a big part of this hearing, I suspect. So, what happened is, WikiLeaks has now made public the environmental chapter of TPP. It’s been a very secretive process. So when these chapters come out, it basically allows everyone for the first time to really see what’s being done.


And the enormous news, front page of The New York Times, is that the Obama administration, where they are, if this agreement is finalized the way it is now, it would roll back even what the Bush administration had done in its trade agreements on environmental standards. And specifically, all the other TPP countries are insisting that the environmental standards not be enforceable at the same level as, say, the commercial standards. And the chapter also falls direly short on a whole bunch of conservation measures, very important ones, having to do with timber and fisheries. So, the really startling development yesterday was not only Sierra Club, who has been leading the fight against—for the environmental groups against TPP and Fast Track, but they were joined by the environmental groups that supported NAFTA—so, World Wildlife Fund, NRDC. The environmental movement is basically unified, saying, “For God’s sakes, the Democratic president can’t roll back what the Republican president had on environment in trade agreements.”


AMY GOODMAN: Lori Wallach and Nobuhiko Suto, we’re going to have to leave it there, but I thank you both very much for being with us. Of course, we’ll continue to follow the Trans-Pacific Partnership. And that does it for our broadcast. We are here in Tokyo, Japan, and I hope people come out to a public lecture Saturday, January 18th. I’ll be speaking in Tokyo at Sophia University at 10:00 a.m. at the International Conference Room, No. 2 Building. Then on Sunday, I’ll be in Kyoto at 7:00 p.m. And on Monday, at the Foreign Correspondents Club of Japan for a noon talk. Special thanks to the NHK international crew. Go to our website at democracynow.org.




Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

Democracy Now!

Japan Remains Hotbed of TPP Protest as U.S. Tries to Fast-Track Trade Deal, Crush Environmental Laws

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

NDAA Martial Law"s Hidden Passage - The Day America Became A Police State (Video)

At A Political Statement, the privacy of our visitors is of extreme importance to us (See this article to learn more about Privacy Policies.). This privacy policy document outlines the types of personal information is received and collected by A Political Statement and how it is used.

Log Files

Like many other Web sites, A Political Statement makes use of log files. The information inside the log files includes internet protocol (IP) addresses, type of browser, Internet Service Provider (ISP), date/time stamp, referring/exit pages, and number of clicks to analyze trends, administer the site, track user"s movement around the site, and gather demographic information. IP addresses, and other such information are not linked to any information that is personally identifiable.

Cookies and Web Beacons

A Political Statement does use cookies to store information about visitors preferences, record user-specific information on which pages the user access or visit, customize Web page content based on visitors browser type or other information that the visitor sends via their browser.

DoubleClick DART Cookie

  • Google, as a third party vendor, uses cookies to serve ads on A Political Statement.
  • Google"s use of the DART cookie enables it to serve ads to users based on their visit to A Political Statement and other sites on the Internet.
  • Users may opt out of the use of the DART cookie by visiting the Google ad and content network privacy policy at the following URL - http://www.google.com/privacy_ads.html.

These third-party ad servers or ad networks use technology to the advertisements and links that appear on A Political Statement send directly to your browsers. They automatically receive your IP address when this occurs. Other technologies ( such as cookies, JavaScript, or Web Beacons ) may also be used by the third-party ad networks to measure the effectiveness of their advertisements and / or to personalize the advertising content that you see.

A Political Statement has no access to or control over these cookies that are used by third-party advertisers.

You should consult the respective privacy policies of these third-party ad servers for more detailed information on their practices as well as for instructions about how to opt-out of certain practices. A Political Statement"s privacy policy does not apply to, and we cannot control the activities of, such other advertisers or web sites.

If you wish to disable cookies, you may do so through your individual browser options. More detailed information about cookie management with specific web browsers can be found at the browser"s respective websites.


NDAA Martial Law"s Hidden Passage - The Day America Became A Police State (Video)

40,000 new laws take effect in 2014


CNN
December 31, 2013


It may have been the least productive year for Congress in history, at least in terms of passing laws – fewer than 60 of which made it through the House and Senate and were signed by President Barack Obama.


Across the country, however, state lawmakers were busy getting more than 40,000 bills passed, ones that tackle everything from drones to food stamp benefits.


In Illinois for example, teenagers will no longer get to use tanning beds without a doctor’s note. If you live in Delaware, visit the shark fin buffet while you can, a new law will make it illegal to own, sale, or distribute the controversial delicacy. And in California, new laws take effect that will let students take part in school sports, or use bathrooms based on their gender identity, regardless of the gender noted in their birth certificates.


Read more


This article was posted: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 at 8:55 pm









Infowars



40,000 new laws take effect in 2014

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Spain fines Google €900,000 for breaching privacy laws


Earlier this year, the French independent administrative authority CNIL advised six European countries to take action over Google’s privacy policies. Now Spain has become the first of the six to fine the search giant, demanding 900,000 ($ 1.24 million) for breaching the nation’s privacy laws. The Wall Street Journal reports that the fine, administered by the Spanish Agency for Data Protection, is for three legal breaches: “gathering data on users, combining the data through several services and keeping the data indefinitely without the knowledge or consent of users.”


EU regulators urged Google to change its privacy policy in September 2012. The company ignored the request, clearing the way for a lengthy investigation that resulted in the CNIL advising European data protection authorities to take action. When asked to comment on that advice in April, Google told The Verge that its privacy policy “respects European law and allows [it] to create simpler, more effective services.” Five other countries — Italy, Germany, France, the UK, and the Netherlands — may also decide to fine the American company in the coming months.




The Verge – All Posts



Spain fines Google €900,000 for breaching privacy laws

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Sodomy laws still exist?!

Sodomy laws still exist?!



In part because of dawning awareness about what Americans were actually getting up to in the privacy of their bedrooms — thanks, Alfred Kinsey – sodomy was cut from the American Law Institute’s Model Penal Code in 1962. “Nearly simultaneously, as part of its updating of its criminal code, the State of Illinois became the first to decriminalize consensual sodomy,” explains Canaday. Several states followed suit — but reform got more complicated as sodomy “became even more closely associated with homosexuality in the decade after the Stonewall riots,” she wrote. “Simultaneously, the connection to homosexuality ‘became a reason, as well as an obstacle, for sodomy law reform.’”


And here we are today, with two states still explicitly outlawing gay sex (and several more banning sodomy regardless of sexual orientation). The Kansas law criminalizes sodomy between “members of the same sex or between a person and an animal.” (Because in some conservatives’ eyes, gay sex and bestiality are the same. No exaggeration — remember Rick Santorum comparing homosexuality to sex with dogs?) The Texas statute defines it as an offense for a person to engage in “deviate sexual intercourse” — defined as anal or oral — “with another individual of the same sex.”


Now, the 2003 Supreme Court ruling in Lawrence v. Texas rendered such prohibitions unconstitutional — but they are still used to justify discrimination, and conservatives have fought to keep them around for a reason. As Tim Murphy wrote in Mother Jones, “Conservatives in those states know they can’t enforce the laws, but by keeping them in the code, they can send a message that homosexuality is officially condemned by the government.”


This isn’t an issue of states not getting around to paperwork. Attempts at legislative appeal have been actively resisted — even as major efforts have been made to strike other outdated laws from the books. In 2003, Santorum responded to the Supreme Court’s decision in Lawrence v. Texas by saying, “[I]f the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does.”


As recently as 2012, American Family Association spokesperson Bryan Fischer wrote in an op-ed, “We have been saying for years that homosexual behavior ought to be contrary to public policy because it is a menace to public health.” That same year, the Texas GOP’s party platform took an outright stance against “the practice of homosexuality.”


With the rise of same-sex marriage, homophobes have clung tighter yet to the remaining anti-gay sodomy laws. Only this year did Montana manage to get rid of its law criminalizing “sexual contact or sexual intercourse between two persons of the same sex,” even though it was deemed unconstitutional by a State Supreme Court 16 years ago. (Just two years earlier, a bill attempting to erase the code was killed by the House Judiciary Committee.) This year also saw Virginia overturn its sodomy law.


Of course, there are plenty of reasons to criticize in the Indian Supreme Court decision — but let’s not act like our hands are clean.




Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text RSS Feed | RFID | Amazon Affiliate

Salon.com


Read more about Sodomy laws still exist?! and other interesting subjects concerning Top Stories at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Saturday, December 7, 2013

John K. Ross on Stupid Laws that Cause Dangerous Hospital Shortages

John K. Ross on Stupid Laws that Cause Dangerous Hospital Shortages
http://cloudfront-media.reason.com/mc/zevans@reason.com/Healthcare-medicine-doctor-walking-away-credit-foter-Yuya-Tamai-CC-BY.jpg?h=188&w=250

Dec. 7, 2013 2:00 pm



Yuya-Tamai-CC-BYYuya-Tamai-CC-BYThis week, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a federal lawsuit alleging mistreatment of a woman in the days leading up to her miscarriage at a Catholic hospital in Michigan. The ACLU accuses Mercy Health Partners of negligence for, among other things, failing to direct Tamesha Means to a hospital that could have safely terminated her nonviable pregnancy after her water broke at only 18 weeks gestation. John K. Ross points out that Means could not have easily gone to another hospital, perhaps one offering the full range of women’s health services, because there is no such hospital, thanks to a stupid law preventing competing facilities from opening.




John K. Ross is a freelance writer and a former Reason intern.



Reason.com Full Feed




Read more about John K. Ross on Stupid Laws that Cause Dangerous Hospital Shortages and other interesting subjects concerning Surveillance State at TheDailyNewsReport.com

Monday, November 25, 2013

California: Bay Area Gun Laws will Result in Confiscation of Police Gun Magazines


NRA ILA
November 25, 2013


Browning 9mm pistol, 13 round magazine would be banned under new laws.

Browning 9mm pistol, 13 round magazine would be banned under new laws. / Photo: LA(Phot) Brian Douglas/MOD, via Wikimedia Commons



On November 19, the San Francisco Veteran Police Officers Association (SFVPOA) filed a lawsuit, supported by the National Rifle Association (NRA), in federal court challenging San Francisco’s recent ban on the possession of magazines capable of holding more than ten rounds.   A lawsuit is currently being prepared against the City of Sunnyvale, which recently adopted a similar magazine ban.   Tens of thousands of law enforcement officers across the country currently possess these common, standard-capacity magazines when they are off duty for self-defense, sport and other lawful purposes.   The new magazine confiscation laws will force active police officers in San Francisco and Sunnyvale to surrender their privately-owned magazines – or face criminal liability.

In a recent interview, Larry Barsetti, a plaintiff in the San Francisco lawsuit and a member of the SFVPOA, pointed out that law enforcement officers will be in violation of the ban if they possess any prohibited magazines that were not issued to them for official duties.  When asked to comment, the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office confirmed that the ordinance “does not prohibit off duty officers from keeping their duty weapons because those weapons are issued to them in connection with their official duties.”


Police officers who have any magazines over ten rounds in their personal collections, or any magazines they were authorized to purchase for off-duty use, must dispose of those magazines.  If they don’t, the officers will become criminals.


The same is true for active law enforcement officials in Sunnyvale.  Sunnyvale’s Measure C only exempts police officers who possess magazines over ten rounds “while acting within the course and scope of her or her duties.”


Family members of law enforcement officers are also at risk.  If an officer leaves the house without locking his or her magazines away, anyone who is present in the home will be in violation of the law.


The misguided laws also place thousands of state and federal law enforcement officials who travel through San Francisco in jeopardy.  Many off-duty law enforcement officials lawfully carry a firearm with a magazine that holds more than ten rounds when traveling in other cities and states.   Every time these officers travel into San Francisco or Sunnyvale, they will be in violation of the law and subject to criminal prosecution.


San Francisco and Sunnyvale officers, like law-abiding citizens, will have until the first week of March to turn in their prohibited magazines in one of three ways: turn them over to the police (strangely enough), remove them from those cities in the few cases where it might be possible to do legally, or transfer them to a licensed firearms dealer – who cannot give them back.


It appears these cities snuck a limited police exemption into the law to appease law enforcement, but police officials didn’t realize that the law effectively strips them of their personally-owned magazines.


Will San Francisco and Sunnyvale stick to their convictions about removing these magazines from their borders and actively confiscate magazines from officers who unlawfully possess them?


This article was posted: Monday, November 25, 2013 at 12:46 pm


Tags: constitution, gun rights









Infowars



California: Bay Area Gun Laws will Result in Confiscation of Police Gun Magazines

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

MEPs vote to tighten anti-tobacco laws, target young smokers



Published time: October 08, 2013 16:39

John Moore/Getty Images/AFP

John Moore/Getty Images/AFP




European MPs have voted to dramatically tighten tobacco laws across the union and have focused much of the legislation on trying to put young people off smoking. But the new measures do not go as far as anti-smoking campaigners had hoped for.


MPs have voted in favor of a ban on menthol cigarettes, although the law won’t come into force for another five years and there will be more negotiations with EU governments before the law is adopted in member states.


Other measures to deter people, particularly the young, from smoking, include putting health warnings on 65 percent of each side of cigarette packs (though not 75%, as originally proposed). Currently health warnings must cover 30 percent of one side of a pack of cigarettes and 40 percent of the other.


There will also be ban on the words appearing on cigarette packs such as “low tar”, “mild” and “light”. The new laws will also apply to roll-your-own tobacco.


Chewing tobacco will also be banned, with the exception of in Sweden, where it is called snus and is relatively popular.


The proposed legislation will also allow member states to introduce plain cigarette packaging if they think the need is justified.


However, lawmakers rejected a proposal by the European Commission to force electronic cigarettes to be sold as medical products, which would have restricted sales. They also did not ban slim cigarettes – smoked by some, particularly women, with the idea that they help with weight loss and are associated with looking attractive.


Amanda Sandford from the smoking and health camping group Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), while welcoming the laws, said she would like to have seen them go further.


“We would like to have seen MEPs vote to increase health warnings to 75%,” Sandford told RT. “We’d also like to see e-cigarettes regulated under medical legislation. While e-cigarettes are considerably less hazardous than tobacco products, because they’re not properly regulated at the moment, we can’t be sure they’re entirely safe.”


The vote was preceded by intense lobbying from the tobacco industry and health campaigners on European MPs. Nearly 700,000 Europeans die from smoking-related illnesses each year, with an estimated healthcare cost across the EU of 25.3 billion euros ($ 33.4 billion) annually. Meanwhile, in the UK alone the sale of tobacco products generated £9 billion ($ 14.6 billion) last year, amounting to 2% of all tax revenue.


There will now be further negotiations between EU health ministers, which may mean MEPs will be able to avoid a second vote and fast-track the legislation to become law before the May 2014 European elections.


AFP Photo/Denis Charlet


Britain has already said that e-cigarettes will have to be licensed as a medical product from 2016. E-cigarettes replicate the action of smoking without using tobacco and instead turn nicotine and other chemicals into vapor.


While sales of e-cigarettes have boomed since smoking was banned in public places in the EU over six years ago, campaigners say their growing popularity is dangerous.  They say they could encourage non-smokers and children to start the habit and undermine years of anti-smoking campaigns.


The European Commission also stated that cigarette packs must be big enough to make sure that the new larger warnings are fully visible. They recommended that manufactures must produce a minimum of 20 cigarettes per pack. However in the UK and Italy 10 is the minimum size.


Their recommendation will doubtless please health campaigners in the UK, who are calling for a ban on so-called ‘kiddy packs’ of 10 because they can be brought with pocket money.


Sandford also said that standardizing packs to 20 may encourage some people to give up smoking.


“Having a minimum pack size may help smokers who are trying to quit, particularly poorer smokers, because having to pay out for a pack of 20 cigarettes may make them think twice about the need to smoke,” she said.


An estimated 4 percent of children in England between the ages of 11 and 15 years old are believed to be smoking at least once a week.


But a lobby group called the Freedom Organization for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco (FOREST) argues that around 2 million people in the UK buy their cigarettes in packs of 10 because that is all they can afford, or are trying to cut down, and there is no evidence that forcing people to buy a pack of 20 will reduce smoking. The FOREST campaign is funded by the tobacco industry.




RT – News



MEPs vote to tighten anti-tobacco laws, target young smokers

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Forced Evictions, Anti-Gay Laws, and Dead Workers: Welcome to World Cup Prep

Last week, the Guardian published a report into the slavelike conditions of Qatar’s World Cup construction projects. Detailing the tragic deaths of 44 Nepalese migrant workers and the squalid conditions of thousands more prepping for the event in 2022, the Guardian‘s reporting has rightfully drawn the attention of the international community. But labor relations aren’t the only issue in Qatar—and the Middle Eastern state is far from an exception among World Cup hosts. In fact, all three of the next Cup locations have been widely criticized for human rights and inequality issues.


Here are some of the more egregious examples:


BRAZIL (2014)


Last week, a Brazilian government investigation into the Sao Paulo Guarulhos International airport expansion project—set for completion before next year’s World Cup—revealed more than 100 workers living in “conditions analogue to slaves.” According to the BBC, while workers were promised $ 625 a month in wages, some had paid more than $ 220 just to secure a job. Many more were forced into makeshift camps near the airport while waiting for their employment to begin.


In addition to labor concerns, there’s also the question of what to do with all the new infrastructure after the event is over, when operational costs and low returns could leave Brazil’s stadiums like South Africa’s unviable “White Elephants.” (There, the government only recovered a tenth of its World Cup investment.) According to one report, a local official preemptively suggested the $ 240 million 44,500 seat Arena da Amazonia be repurposed as a prison. Of course, that’s assuming a soccer stadium can be maintained at all in a rainforest climate, where humidity and sun can buckle steel and melt the color off seats.


All this poor planning and waste only serves to underscore Brazil’s staggering economic disparity. While Brazil has quickly become the sixth-largest economy in the world, its distribution of wealth is one of the worst in the world, meaning most of that money is going to people at the top. This past June, the “Services Not Soccer” protests questioned spending some $ 13.3 billion on the 2014 World Cup and $ 18 billion on the Rio 2016 Olympic Games—especially with Brazil struggling to deal with big issues like health care, education, and political corruption. Now, the stadium development is forcibly evicting people from slums and raising ticket prices, driving out the poor and working-class fans whose money previously kept struggling soccer clubs alive.


RUSSIA (2018)


In many ways, the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, will act as a litmus test for how international LGBT athletes and advocates are treated under the country’s harsh anti-gay law. If Mother Jones‘ previous reporting is any indication, the results could be alarming.


Russian soccer has also been criticized for its inability to fix hooliganism and racism. In 2011, Brazilian soccer player Roberto Carlos had a banana thrown at him within months of joining Russian FC Anzhi Makhachkala. In 2012, his Congolese teammate Christopher Samba received similar treatment. Two years earlier, Alexey Sorokin, then-director of the Russian Football Union, defended several fans who put a banana on a banner to taunt Peter Odemwingie, claiming the banana as Soviet slang with “nothing racial in it.” A leader in Russia’s World Cup bid, Sorokin is now the appointed CEO of the 2018 World Cup Local Organizing Committee. According to the BBC, right before FIFA chose Russia to host the Cup, the Russian Football Union released a memo and announced a website to combat racism. Notably, the site is still offline. And in 2012, Zenit St. Petersburg fans wrote an open letter claiming that using “dark-skinned players” only “brings out a negative reaction” and that gay players were “unworthy of our great city.”


As with the Sochi Olympics, unexpected costs have plagued the 2018 World Cup. The cost of updating transportation, building and renovating stadiums, and ensuring infrastructure and events run smoothly for the entirety of the Cup is now over $ 20 billion, twice as much as previously projected. Part of the problem? Hosting games in remote cities like Saransk, where the only flight from Moscow is on an overnight propeller plane and the city’s primary achievement is as a onetime center of the Gulag prison system. These costs, combined with the $ 50 billion price tag of the Olympic games, could make a heavy dent in Russia’s near-zero-growth economy.
 


QATAR (2022)


Qatar’s treatment of migrant workers has long been a problem. Prior to the Guardian investigation, Human Rights Watch called out Qatar’s exit visa system and employment sponsorship system. Both require a resident to vouch for a worker’s ability and can effectively prevent a migrant from starting work, finding housing, or even leaving the country. Within World Cup construction sites, thousands of workers have spoken out about confiscated passports and visas, cramped living situations (up to 20 people in a single room), and forced labor in desert heat without food or water. (Don’t worry, fans and players: Organizers are mulling a massive air-conditioning system for you.) These conditions led to the death of 44 Nepalese workers from June 4 to August 8 alone.


Altogether, current estimates for Qatar’s World Cup facilities, transportation, air conditioning, and construction of an entirely new city come in at a whopping $ 220 billion, approximately 1.3 times the country’s total annual GDP. While Qatar’s GDP is undeniably large for its size, that’s 60 times what South Africa spent on the 2010 World Cup. Note: The richest Qataris make as much as 13 times more than the poorest.


Homosexuality is also illegal in Qatar, and foreigners have previously been whipped, imprisoned, and deported as punishment. Since Shariah law is effect, Qatari Muslims could theoretically be executed for homosexuality. Three years ago, when asked what gay fans should do in Qatar, FIFA president Sepp Blatter said, “They should refrain from any sexual activities.” Now, FIFA is reported to be pressuring Russia and Qatar to relax anti-gay laws during the World Cup, but with the games still several years away, a decision may not come anytime soon.


In the meantime, there have been some rumblings about moving the event, maybe even to the United States. Unfortunately for US soccer supporters (and perhaps migrant workers and gay fans), the relocation dream remains just that.



Politics | Mother Jones



Forced Evictions, Anti-Gay Laws, and Dead Workers: Welcome to World Cup Prep

Friday, September 27, 2013

Intolerance In Matthew Shepherd’s Name: How Lies Become Laws


bookofmatt Intolerance in Matthew Shepherd’s Name: How Lies Become Laws


It will be fascinating to see how people react to a new book by an award-winning gay journalist exposing the truth about the 1998 death of homosexual Matthew Shepherd.


Just as a backdrop of lies brought us legalized abortion in 1973 through Roe v. Wade, it now appears that more lies were used to help homosexual activists kick the bullying industry into hyper-drive via the tragic death of Matthew Shepherd.


Facts about the Shepherd case were wrongfully reported and widely accepted as truth.


Much has been accomplished for leftists and homosexual activists in the name of tolerance, including the implementation of anti-bullying curriculums in public schools, most of which discriminate against Christians. Songs have been written and dedicated to Matthew Shepherd by Elton John, Melissa Etheridge, Lady Gaga, and others. Films have been made about his death, and a dedication play called “The Laramie Project” has been performed over 2,000 times worldwide.


In 2009, President Obama signed the Hate Crimes Prevention Act, a federal law against gay hate crimes that was named after Matthew Shepherd. The new details of the Shepherd case won’t sit well with our pro-homosexual government.


What really happened?


Matthew Shepherd accepted a ride from two men, Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson, in October 1998. They pistol-whipped him, robbed him, tied him to a fence, and left. The incident became a famous ‘hate’ crime because the motives were made up by opportunistic activists, and the media ran with the ‘vicious homophobes’ narrative even before Shepherd died!


This new bombshell book by Stephen Jimenez, The Book of Matt, was written after he personally interviewed hundreds of people (including the two murderers), concluding that the case had more to do with drugs than Shepherd’s sexuality.


It turns out Shepard was a regular crystal meth user and a meth dealer; and his killer, McKinney, had been on a meth bender. Inconvenient facts were ignored, and America’s most famous hate crime was not a hate crime after all.


Gay journalist Aaron Hicklin asked this question in his article in The Advocate:


And how does it color our understanding of such a crime if the perpetrator and victim not only knew each other but also had [homosexual] sex together, bought drugs from one another, and partied together?



Someone recently said, “Only a weak cause which is not confident of its own righteousness needs to lie to prove its point.” What difference does it make today when the damage has already been done in the courts of public opinion?


This goes beyond lies to advancing an aggressive agenda.


Let’s recall a shocking, disturbing murder committed by homosexuals – an actual hate crime few have heard about.


A complicit national media fanned the flames of false homophobia in the Shepherd case. The following is an excerpt from a chapter entitled, “Normalizing Homosexuality” in the book – ERADICATE: BLOTTING OUT GOD IN AMERICA.


In Prairie Grove, Arkansas, thirteen-year-old Jesse (Yates) Dirkhising was killed by two homosexual men [in 1999]. Jesse was bound and drugged, tortured, raped, and he died due to a combination of the drugs and the position in which he was tied down. The Washington Times was the only national media outlet to report the story at first.


…the Matthew Shepard case received massive, ongoing national media atten­tion because Shepard, the victim, was a homosexual. While both victims died as the result of assaults by two men, Dirkhising was a minor while Shepard was an adult. No protections have been issued or written on behalf of minors, but severe hate crimes legislations have been passed and implemented to protect homosexuals. Gays (it’s an unwritten rule) cannot be portrayed as villains by the media even if they were convicted of rape, torture, and murder.


The Washington Times story was headlined, “Media tune out torture death of Arkansas boy.” Tim Graham, director of media studies at the Media Research Center said that no one in the media wants to be on the wrong side of the issue by saying anything negative about homo­sexuals. The LexisNexis Group provides computer-assisted research services and revealed a drastic contrast in the two cases in a media search.


One month after each murder, there were 3,007 stories about Matthew Shepard’s death compared with only forty-six stories about Jesse Dirkhising’s death.



The deception and duplicity of this double standard is glaring.


How should Christians respond when some claim we’re being hateful, bigoted, or intolerant by simply talking about our faith? Pray for them because for those who have not placed their faith in the only Truth, Jesus Christ, this life is all there is.


1 Corinthians 6:9-10 features a laundry list of sins describing those who will not inherit God’s kingdom. We must all appear before a holy, all-powerful God on Judgment Day; and we should be most concerned with our own standing with God before looking at others.


We also need to avoid extremes. One extreme is the ‘God hates fags’ crowd, who treat homosexual behavior as the unforgivable sin. It is not. The other extreme is being silent, accepting or even approving of the destructive lifestyle of homosexuality mainly because we  fear opposition. Don’t be intimidated.


Bullying is bullying, no matter who is doing it! Hey activists: name calling and stereotyping people that stand for what they believe is exactly what you don’t want done to you. The right of free speech should work both ways.


Hate crime and bullying propaganda has been used to advance their agenda temporarily, but God will have the final say.


Follow @Fiorazo on Twitter


Photo credit: Amazon.com


Please share this post with your friends and comment below. If you haven’t already, take a moment to sign up for our free newsletter above and friend us on Twitter and Facebook to get real time updates.



Western Journalism



Intolerance In Matthew Shepherd’s Name: How Lies Become Laws

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Newtown to Navy Yard: Gun Laws Still a Tough Sell



A handful of lawmakers are urging their colleagues to renew the debate about gun violence after Monday’s mass shooting at the Washington Navy Yard. But even Congress’ top advocates of stricter laws know the prospects of any reprised legislation are as dim as ever.


Monday’s tragedy literally hit close to home for those on Capitol Hill, given the proximity of the massacre that claimed 13 lives (including that of the alleged gunman). Discussion in the Senate — which was under a brief lockdown after the shooting — inevitably turned to guns. But it doesn’t figure to last long.


Several lawmakers remarked that the news of a shooter storming into a supposedly secure facility and killing more than a dozen people is unfortunately too familiar. But they surmise that if the Newtown, Conn., attack that left 20 first-graders dead didn’t sway enough members of the Democratic-controlled Senate, what else could?


Sen. Joe Manchin was virtually speechless when asked that question before meeting his colleagues for lunch Tuesday. The West Virginia Democrat’s background-check bill, co-authored by fellow NRA “A-rated” Sen. Pat Toomey, a Republican from Pennsylvania, fell short by six votes last spring.


Manchin said he hopes his bill, or one like it, reaches the upper chamber floor again. But “unless there is desire for a change and people want to change” their votes, there won’t be much movement. The first-term senator and others said they would continue to talk to their colleagues, but noted they are still in the early stages of learning more about the shooter and the possible causes of attack.


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he would like to bring back the failed legislation — which would have expanded background checks to gun show and Internet sales, but wouldn’t require them for personal sales or loans — but noted that the votes still aren’t there.


The formula for passing any type of legislation related to guns has eluded this Congress, despite political capital spent on the issue by President Obama shortly after his re-election, the push for legislation by some unlikely sources in Congress, supportive polling data on public attitudes, and the passionate lobbying of Newtown families on Capitol Hill and beyond.


California Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who has pushed for an assault weapons ban, acknowledged the challenge. “We need 60 votes,” she told reporters outside the Senate chamber. “And to go through it all again, it’s a very emotional discussion because it involves human life — innocent life — and to not be able to succeed is hard.”


After the Navy Yard shooting, the talk on Capitol Hill centered on legislative responses related to mental health and security clearances.


Monday’s alleged shooter reportedly had a history of mental illness and sought treatment from the Department of Veterans Affairs. Aaron Alexis, a former Navy reservist, was previously arrested for gun-related incidents: once for shooting out the tires of someone’s vehicle with a Glock pistol in Seattle and another for shooting a gun inside his apartment in Fort Worth, Texas. He was not charged in either case. He was honorably discharged from the U.S. Navy Reserve in 2011. Officials determined Alexis bought the shotgun he was armed with in Monday’s killings in Lorton, Va., and reportedly had a permit to carry a concealed weapon.


Lawmakers are questioning how Alexis obtained a security clearance, given his past. “When you shoot a guy’s tires out because you’re mad at him, you’re a good candidate to not work in the federal government,” Sen. Lindsey Graham said. “The fact that it never got reported in the system is deeply troubling.” In March, the South Carolina Republican and other lawmakers offered a background check bill dealing with mentally ill potential buyers, but it did not advance. That is the bigger issue, said Graham, who noted, “I don’t think anything has changed on guns.”


The time lapse between Newtown and Navy Yard has revealed several challenges facing advocates of stricter gun laws, in addition to the failure of legislation earlier this year.


A recent blow to their efforts came in Colorado. Earlier in the year, as a response to the Newtown massacre, the state legislature approved a bill requiring universal background checks and banning ammunition magazines that hold more than 15 rounds. Emboldened gun rights supporters gathered enough signatures to recall two legislators who supported the measure, state Senate President Dan Morse and Sen. Angela Giron.


Although gun control advocates outspent recall proponents by a 6-1 margin, Morse and Giron were recalled from their heavily Democratic districts by two and 12 percentage points, respectively. Barack Obama earned nearly 60 percent of the vote in both districts last fall, but enthusiastic turnout from gun rights supporters enabled the recall victories.


Another challenge is time. “Guns have always been very ephemeral for people,” says Lanae Erickson Hatalsky, the director of social policy and politics at Third Way, a center-left think tank that has been tracking the legislation.


“Public attention gets paid to it [after shootings] but then it goes back down. Attention to Newtown lasted longer because of the sheer horrifying nature of the bloodshed. But it’s a fact in politics that people pay attention for a bit, then move on to other issues.”


Erickson Hatalsky pointed out that it took a dozen years to pass the Brady Handgun Violence Protection Act, a 1994 law named for President Ronald Reagan’s press secretary who was shot during a 1981 assassination attempt. “I’m not sure there is anything else that the president or others can do about it except for continuing to make the case that we should keep guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t have them.”


Cultivating support is made complicated by the full plate of other issues lawmakers are facing — chief among them passing a budget resolution and lifting the debt ceiling by Sept. 30 and mid-October, respectively. A push for a vote on military action in Syria, which was later placed on hold, took up legislative time and political energy. The House will take up the second part of the Farm Bill this week. The Senate is examining energy legislation. Meanwhile, immigration reform remains stalled.


There may be an avenue for extra scrutiny for concealed-carry laws, Erickson Hatalsky said. Alexis reportedly had a permit to carry a weapon that was honored in Texas but not in the District of Columbia. The National Rifle Association has been pushing to expand permits, as the laws widely vary from state to state. An NRA-backed “concealed carry reciprocity” amendment to the background check bill failed by three votes, but if passed it would have required that other states’ concealed-weapons permit laws be honored everywhere.


Notably, though, action on gun issues has taken place only in the Democratic-controlled Senate. The GOP-led House is a different story. Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer said he doesn’t expect to have a vote on any proposals, pointing to the Senate’s failed efforts in April.


The House’s No. 2 Democrat told reporters: “If the past is prologue, our prologue is not very hopeful.”




RealClearPolitics – Articles



Newtown to Navy Yard: Gun Laws Still a Tough Sell

Tuesday, August 27, 2013

US blacks want more civil rights laws


U.S. black Americans say more civil rights laws are needed to reduce discrimination against blacks in the wake of George Zimmerman’s acquittal, a poll found.


In an August poll, Gallup found 61 percent of black respondents said there is a need for more civil rights laws, up from 53 percent before Zimmerman was acquitted July 13 of murder in Florida in the death of Trayvon Martin, 17.


A majority of black respondents — 63 percent — also said they think the government should have a “major role” in improving the social and economic position of blacks and other minority groups in the United States.


Meanwhile, white and Hispanic Americans responded differently to the earlier poll: 17 percent of whites and 46 percent of Hispanics said they feel new civil rights laws are needed to combat discrimination against blacks.


Some 22 percent of white respondents said they think the government should have a major role in helping minorities, while 60 percent of Hispanics said the same.


Gallup questioned 1,001 blacks from Aug. 9-22 for the recent poll, which has a margin of error 4 percentage points.


From July 10-14, Gallup questioned 2,149 whites, 1,010 blacks and 1,000 Hispanics. That poll had a margin of error of 3 percentage points. UPI


ISH/ARA




PRESS TV RSS News



US blacks want more civil rights laws

Thursday, August 22, 2013

Just Make Up An Address: Shady Anti-Gun Petitioners Caught Breaking Election Laws


For the anti gun I 594 in Washington state, one signature gatherer tells a videographer from Oregon to “Just put Vancouver, I don’t care. They don’t check all the signatures” in order to get his signature on the petition. This takes place about 200 feet away from another petitioner who was indicted on 2 felony charges relating to signature violations 3 years earlier. Still another signature gatherer abandons her signed petitions out front of a grocery store. This signature gathering operation in Washington is based out of California, and using motel addresses for their business listings.


Lots of shady dealings for the petitioners working for Washington Alliance For Gun Responsibility. Seems as though despite their big money donors, they can’t even run a petitioning operation in a respectable way.


Full transcript of narration:


Meet Kelvin Moore. I did not know his name when this was filmed. He was spotted at the Vancouver, Washington Farmer’s Market gathering signatures for I 594, the initiative sponsored by Washington Alliance For Gun Responsibility, that would require background checks for private firearms transfers.


Though he had both I 594 and the competing initiative, I 591, he was only trying to get people to sign I 594. Several of the other folks working on this petition campaign were leery about telling the name of the of the 3rd party contractor they worked for, but Mr. Moore was willing to spill it. This the company that was most likely contracted by Washington Alliance For Gun Responsibility to collect signatures in the Vancouver area.


I was unable to find anything on “national petitions for citizens”, however a “national petitionERS for citizens” came up in the Washington state public records disclosure website, and revealed a “Kelvin Moore” as the entity name for the sole proprietorship. A quick search of the name Kelvin Moore revealed that that, indeed, is who I was talking to on this video, as he matches the face in this mugshot, and this one. It turns out Mr. Moore is no stranger to working petition campaigns. In 2010, he was indicted in Multnomah County on 2 counts of making false statements under election law, both class C Felonies. Turns out there was some funny business going on with some of the names he supposedly got to sign his petitions.


Seems like it’s more of the same this time around, as one of the people working for him, who was staked out at that same farmer’s market about 200 feet away from Mr. Moore, encouraged someone to sign the petition with a fake name and fake address.


Additionally, another I 594 petitioner was spotted at Chuck’s Produce on the east side of Vancouver, and left her petitions unguarded 2 times in a 30 minute span, once for about 2 minutes, and again for about 8 minutes. Anyone could have signed with phony names, stolen the petitions, or phished personal information from other signers.


Going back to Mr. Moore’s Washington State business record, it shows his business mailing address as 1050 The Alameda in San Jose, California. Turns out that address is a motel called The Alameda. Turning to his in state business location, he lists 221 NE Chkalov Dr, room 412, Vancouver, Washington. That address is a Motel 6.


And here’s a shot of his car, with the California plates, missing the month on the registration tag.


As if that wasn’t sketchy enough, searches for “National Petitioners For Citizens” return with no hits matching that name.


Quite the reputable outfit that Mr. Moore has, and one has to wonder why Washington Alliance For Gun Responsibility is reduced to using out of state, fly by night operations, who have questionable pasts regarding petitioning to gather signatures for them who encourage people to sign with with fake addresses and leave their petition sheets unguarded. You’d think they’d be able to do better, considering the big money donors they have funneling money into their campaign.


Sent to us by www.youtube.com/LaughingAtLiberals.






Just Make Up An Address: Shady Anti-Gun Petitioners Caught Breaking Election Laws